Next Article in Journal
Characterization and Pre-Concentration of Low-Grade Vanadium-Titanium Magnetite Ore
Previous Article in Journal
Flotation Behaviors of Perovskite, Titanaugite, and Magnesium Aluminate Spinel Using Octyl Hydroxamic Acid as the Collector
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Utilization of the MgO-Rich Residue Originated from Ludwigite Ore: Hydrothermal Synthesis of MHSH Whiskers

School of Minerals Processing and Bioengineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Minerals 2017, 7(8), 138; https://doi.org/10.3390/min7080138
Submission received: 14 June 2017 / Accepted: 30 July 2017 / Published: 4 August 2017

Abstract

:
In this work, from the MgO-enriched residue originated from ludwigite ore, value-added magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate (MHSH) whiskers were prepared via sulfuric acid leaching and leachate purification, followed by hydrothermal synthesis. During sulfuric acid leaching, 98.2% magnesium and 99.6% silica were removed under the optimal leaching conditions: sulfuric acid concentration of 40%, leaching temperature of 80 °C, leaching time of 90 min, and liquid to solid ratio of 4 mL/g. After purification of the acidic leachate via oxidation and precipitation to remove impurities including iron and aluminum, the Mg2+-rich solution was used to prepare magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate whiskers (5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, abbreviated as 512MHSH) via hydrothermal synthesis. Finally, 512MHSH whiskers were obtained with 30–100 μm in length, 0.5–1.0 μm in diameter and aspect ratio of approximately 100. The physicochemical characteristics of whiskers were further characterized by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), Scanning Electron Microscopy-Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR) and Thermogravimetry-Differential Scanning Calorimetry (TG-DSC).

1. Introduction

Magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate (MHSH) is a group of magnesium salts with a general formula of xMg(OH)2·yMgSO4·zH2O (referred to as xyz MHSH, including type 513, 512, 123, 318, 131, etc.) [1,2]. MHSH whiskers are important inorganic materials [3,4], with various distinctive properties including low toxicity, high corrosion resistance, low density, high thermal stability and high elastic modulus [5,6,7,8,9], which have been widely used as resin additives of flame retardant for polymers, fillers, reinforcing agent, and acidic waste neutralizer for environmental protection, etc. [10,11,12,13]. MHSH whiskers are usually prepared via hydrothermal synthesis [1,14,15]. By using MgSO4 and NH3·H2O as the starting materials, MHSH whiskers with an aspect ratio larger than 100 were synthesized at 150 °C for 16 h [5]. Moreover, a variety of magnesium sources such as magnesium hydroxide, magnesium oxide, magnesium sulfate [16,17], as well as raw serpentine and magnesite ores or even serpentine mine tailings [18], were also used as the starting materials.
Ludwigite ore is rich in boron, iron and magnesium. Its comprehensive utilization has been attempted by using various technologies [19,20,21], with an emphasis on the recovery of boron and iron rather than magnesium [22,23]. Therefore, it’s more beneficial to make use of magnesium component for the production of value-added products, in addition to the recovery of boron and iron [24]. In our previous studies, a process for stepwise recovery of metallic iron and borate from a ludwigite ore based on coal-based direct reduction has shown its potential and promising future [25,26]. After reductive roasting in the presence of soda ash, 72.1% boron and 95.7% iron were extracted in the forms of sodium metaborate and powdery metallic iron, respectively. As boron and iron could be recovered efficiently, magnesium could also be enriched in the nonmagnetic material to a great extent (about 40 wt % MgO). Due to the transformation of magnesium-containing minerals during soda-ash roasting, the non-magnetic material has excellent solubility in acidic liquor. Therefore, the no-magnetic material with high MgO content could be used as a potential magnesium source for the synthesis of MHSH whiskers.
In this study, MgO-enriched residue derived from ludwigite ore was used as the starting material to prepare MHSH whiskers via acid leaching, leachate purification and hydrothermal synthesis. Acid-leaching characteristics of the MgO-enriched residue were evaluated. After removing the impurities of acid leachate, hydrothermal synthesis was then performed to prepare MHSH whiskers.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

2.1.1. MgO-Enriched Residue

The MgO-enriched residue was obtained from ludwigite ore after coal-based reduction roasting, ball mill grinding-water leaching, and magnetic separation [27]. The production process is schematically described in Figure 1.
The chemical composition of the MgO-enriched residue is shown in Table 1, which was characterized by high magnesium (43.54 wt % MgO) and silicon (16.07 wt % SiO2) contents. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern in Figure 2 indicates that the major MgO-enriched residue components were magnesium oxide (MgO), magnesium ferrous oxide (Mg0.91Fe0.09O) and disodium magnesium silicate (Na2MgSiO4).

2.1.2. Chemical Regents

Sulfuric acid, hydrogen peroxide, magnesia and sodium hydroxide were used in the experiments. All of these chemicals were of analytical reagent grade.

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Experimental Procedure

The flow sheet for preparing MHSH whiskers is shown in Figure 3, including: (1) Leaching MgO-enriched residue with sulfuric acid to obtain leachate containing magnesium sulfate after separation of silica; (2) Removing impurities of acidic leachate by oxidation and precipitation; and (3) Preparing MHSH whiskers via hydrothermal synthesis.

2.2.2. Sulfuric Acid Leaching of MgO-Enriched Residue

Leaching experiments were carried out in a 250-mL beaker immersed in a temperature-controlled electrically heated water bath installed with a plastic stirrer. At the beginning of each test, the MgO-enriched residue was added into the beaker and mixed with sulfuric acid solution with the liquid-to-solid ratio ranging from 3 to 7 mL/g. Then, the beaker was soaked in the bath at a given temperature and agitated for a specified period of time. After filtration, the residue was washed with hot water and dried at 105 °C in a drying oven. The leaching ratio of constituents (μ) was calculated as follows:
μ = C t V t m t α t × 100 %
where μ is the leaching ratio, %; Ct is the constituents content of leaching solution; Vt is the volume of leaching solution, mL; αt is the constituents content of MgO-enriched residue; and mt is the mass of MgO-enriched residue.

2.2.3. Purification of Acidic Leachate

Sulfuric acid leachate was charged into a beaker before adding a few drops of potassium ferricyanide as a reaction indicator. Then, hydrogen peroxide was slowly added to oxidize Fe2+ to Fe3+ until the solution’s color changed from light green to yellow. The magniferous solution was added to adjust the pH value to 5.7. The whole process was conducted at a certain temperature and stirring speed. The residue (hydroxides of Fe and Al) was separated from leaching solution and washed with hot water. The removal ratio of impurities (θ) and retention ratio of magnesium (γ) were calculated as follows:
θ = m p α p C t V 0 × 100 %
γ = ( 1 m p α q C t V 0 ) × 100 %
where αp and αq are the content of impurities and magnesium of the precipitate respectively; mp is the weight of the precipitate; Ct and V0 are the constituents content and volume of leachate used in the impurities removal experiments, respectively.

2.2.4. Hydrothermal Synthesis

Hydrothermal synthesis was conducted in an electrically heated autoclave equipped with a one-liter stainless steel tank and plastic stirrer. The synthesis temperature was controlled by a thermostat. For preparing 512MHSH whiskers, the purified MgSO4 solution was added with NaOH (1 mol/L) with various mole ratio in the autoclave. The autoclave was then heated to 120–200 °C and kept under isothermal condition for 0.5–7 h. A white slurry was obtained after the autoclave was cooled down to the room temperature naturally. After filtration, the precipitate was washed with distilled water and then dried in a vacuum oven at 100 °C for 10 h to obtain the whiskers.

2.2.5. Instrumental Analyses

The chemical compositions of the samples were examined using an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (XRF, PANalytical, Axios mAX, Almelo, The Netherlands). The mineral constituents were determined by X-ray diffraction spectrometer (XRD, Rigaku, D/Max 2500, Tokyo, Japan), using a Cu-anode target with the wavelength of 1.54056 Å, scan mode for the step scan, step length of 0.02°. The morphologies of MHSH whiskers were characterized by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL, JSM-6360LM, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The infrared spectrum of MHSH whiskers was characterized by using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR, 830, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The thermal decomposition behavior of MHSH whiskers were characterized using thermogravimetric analysis (TG-DSC, NETZSCH, STA449C, Selb, Germany). The temperature range covered was 30–1400 °C, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min and argon gas flow of 20 mL/min.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Separation and Purification of Magnesium Sulfate from MgO-Enriched Residue

3.1.1. Sulfuric-Acid Leaching Behavior of Magnesium from MgO-Enriched Residue

Effects of leaching temperature, leaching time, sulfuric acid concentration and liquid-to-solid (L/S) ratio on the magnesium dissolution of MgO-enriched residue were examined at a fixed stirring speed of 300 r/min, and the corresponding results are shown in Figure 4.
The leaching ratio of magnesium increased with leaching temperature, time, sulfuric acid concentration and L/S ratio (Figure 4). However, for each variable, the leaching ratio leveled off after a certain value. For temperature, liquid solid ratio, leaching time and acid concentration, these values were determined to be 80 °C, 4, 90 min and 40% sulfuric acid respectively.
From the above results, the optimal parameters for the conversion of magnesium oxide into magnesium sulfate were obtained. The leaching ratio of magnesium reached about 98% under the following leaching conditions: sulfuric acid concentration of 30–40 wt %, leaching temperature of 70–90 °C, leaching time of 90 min, and L/S ratio of 4 mL/g.
By comparing Figure 2 and Figure 5, it was found that magniferous minerals were dissolved by sulfuric acid, leaving amorphous silica gel and calcium sulfate in the leaching residue. Table 2 shows that the leaching residue contains 67.7 wt % SiO2 and 13.98 wt % CaSO4, which could be further used to prepare white carbon black or lithium silicate material.
By comparing the composition of the MgO-enriched residue with that of sulfuric acid-leaching residue, it can be deduced that magnesia and silica were well dissolved. The corresponding reactions are represented as:
MgO + H2SO4 = MgSO4 + H2O
Mg0.91Fe0.09O + H2SO4 = 0.09FeSO4 + 0.91MgSO4 + H2O
Na2MgSiO4 + 2H2SO4 = MgSO4 + Na2SO4 + H4SiO4

3.1.2. Precipitating Impurities of Acidic Leachate

Under the optimal conditions of sulfuric acid leaching of MgO-enriched residue, the leaching of different constituents is shown in Table 3.
As can be seen from Table 3, impurity ions such as Fe3+, Fe2+ and Al3+ existed in the leachate. The presence of these impurity ions will deteriorate the quality of the MHSH whiskers during hydrothermal synthesizing. Therefore, it is necessary to remove Fe3+, Fe2+ and Al3+ in advance.
Table 4 shows that the pH value range for the precipitation of Mg2+ is different from those of Fe3+, Fe2+, Al3+, but the complete precipitation pH of Fe2+ is close to the starting precipitation pH of Mg2+. By adding hydrogen peroxide to oxidize Fe2+ to Fe3+, the differences of precipitating pH values between Mg2+ and impurity ions could be enlarged. In this way, Fe3+, Fe2+ and Al3+ ions are removed according to the following reactions [28]:
2Fe2+ + H2O2 + 2H+ = Fe3+ + 2H2O
Fe3+ + 3OH = Fe(OH)3
Al3+ + 3OH = Al(OH)3
Under the conditions of pH of 5.7, reaction time of 30 min and reaction temperature of 60 °C, the retention ratio of magnesium was 98.1%, while the Fe3+ and Al3+ removal ratios reached 99.6% and 99.9%, respectively. The elemental concentration of the purified solution after oxidation and precipitation is shown in Table 5. Obviously, the purified solution is more suitable for the downstream preparation of value-added products.
The chemical composition of precipitate is shown in Table 6, showing that the precipitate mainly constitutes of Fe2O3 (60.63 wt %). XRD patterns of the precipitate before and after calcination (at 600 °C for 60 min) are shown in Figure 6.

3.2. Preparing MHSH Whiskers from Acidic Leachate

During hydrothermal synthesis, Mg2+ in the solution initially reacted with OH from NaOH to form Mg(OH)2 (Equation (10)). At high temperatures, the Mg(OH)2 precursor dissolved and underwent hydrolysis to produce Mg (OH)64− (Equation (11)). Then the reaction of Mg(OH)64− with SO42− of the solution resulted in MHSH (Equation (12)). Due to the low solubility of Mg(OH)2, an excess amount of MgSO4 was necessary for the growth of whiskers.
The corresponding formation of 512MHSH whiskers can be expressed as:
Mg2+ + 2OH = Mg(OH)2
Mg(OH)2 + 4OH = Mg(OH)64−
6Mg(OH)64− + SO42− + 2H2O = 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O + 26OH

3.2.1. Effect of MgSO4 Concentration

The effect of MgSO4 concentration on the morphology and phase composition of the obtained whiskers was evaluated under the conditions of n(MgSO4):n(NaOH) = 2:1, NaOH concentration of 1 mol/L, hydrothermal processing at 180 °C for 4 h, and stirring speed of 300 r/min.
As shown in Figure 7 and Figure 8, when the MgSO4 concentration was 1.5 mol/L, the synthesized product was Mg(OH)2 and no whiskers were formed. However, when the MgSO4 concentration reached 2.5 mol/L, the morphology of 512MHSH whiskers became more regular, and the maximum aspect ratio exceeded 100. The lengths of whiskers changed slightly with the increasing concentration of MgSO4 to 3.0 mol/L. Overall, the MgSO4 concentration of 2.5–3.0 mol/L was suitable for the hydrothermal synthesis of 512MHSH whiskers.

3.2.2. Effect of Mole Ratio of MgSO4/NaOH

The effect of the mole ratio of MgSO4/NaOH on the morphology and structure of the whiskers was studied under the conditions of the MgSO4 concentration of 2.5 mol/L, NaOH concentration of 1 mol/L, hydrothermal duration of 4 h, hydrothermal temperature of 180 °C, and stirring speed of 300 r/min (Figure 9 and Figure 10).
When the mole ratio of MgSO4/NaOH reached 3, the synthesized product was Mg(OH)2 and no whiskers were formed. However, when the mole ratio of MgSO4/NaOH was decreased to 2, high-quality 512MHSH whiskers with a maximum aspect ratio of about 100 and smooth surface were obtained. Nevertheless, 512MHSH whiskers gradually converted to Mg(OH)2 with the further decrease of MgSO4/NaOH mole ratio. Thus, the optimum mole ratio of MgSO4/NaOH was 2.

3.2.3. Effect of Hydrothermal Temperature

Effects of hydrothermal temperature on the morphology and phase composition of whiskers were studied under the conditions of n(MgSO4):n(NaOH) = 2:1, MgSO4 concentration of 2.5 mol/L, NaOH concentration of 1 mol/L, hydrothermal duration of 4 h, and stirring speed of 300 r/min.
From Figure 11 and Figure 12, there were no 512MHSH whiskers at 120 °C. The morphology of whiskers became regular with increasing temperature. 512MHSH whiskers with high aspect ratio of 100 and smooth surface in the absence of Mg(OH)2 impurities were successfully synthesized at 180 °C, but the 512MHSH whiskers disappeared when the temperature was further increased to 200 °C. Thus, the optimal hydrothermal temperature range was 160–180 °C.

3.2.4. Effect of Hydrothermal Duration

Effects of hydrothermal duration on the morphology and phase of whiskers were studied under the conditions of n(MgSO4):n(NaOH) = 2:1, MgSO4 concentration of 2.5 mol/L, NaOH concentration of 1 mol/L, hydrothermal temperature of 180 °C, and stirring speed of 300 r/min.
Figure 13 and Figure 14 show morphologies of whiskers synthesized by varying the hydrothermal duration from 0.5 to 7 h. The morphologies became more complete with the extension of hydrothermal time. The 512MHSH whiskers only presented a few sporadic whiskers with short fiber length in 0.5 h. When the hydrothermal duration was extended to 4 h, the whiskers gradually grew to be smooth with a uniform aspect ratio of about 100. Whiskers, however, were destroyed once again when the hydrothermal duration further increased to 7 h.
Based on the above results, the optimal hydrothermal synthesis conditions for preparing 512MHSH whiskers are as follows: 2.5–3.0 mol/L MgSO4 in 1.0 mol/L NaOH solution for a fixed MgSO4/NaOH mole ratio of 2 at 160–180 °C for 2.0–4.0 h. Under these conditions, the 512MHSH whiskers with a length of 30–100 μm, an average diameter of 0.5–1.0 μm and an aspect ratio of ~100 were produced.

3.3. Characterization of MHSH Whiskers

3.3.1. XRD

The XRD pattern of the hydrothermal product, prepared under the optimal hydrothermal synthesis conditions, is shown in Figure 15. All the diffraction peaks can be indexed to the orthorhombic structure of 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O (PDF No. 86-1322).

3.3.2. SEM-EDS

It can be observed that the hydrothermal product has needle-like morphology with sector-like ends (Figure 16). The whiskers have a length of 30–100 μm and an average diameter of 0.5–1.0 μm. The EDS spectrum indicates that the ratio of Mg to S is very close to the stoichiometric value of 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O.

3.3.3. FT-IR

The infrared spectrum of the hydrothermal product is shown in Figure 17. The peaks at 3648.78 and 3611.43 cm−1 are assigned to the –OH stretching vibration. The peak at 3416.40 cm−1 is the hydrogen bond formed by reactions of hydroxyls. The peak at 1628.19 cm−1 is due to the bending vibration of the –OH bond. The peak at 815.91 cm−1 is the coordination bond between H2O and Mg2+. Two sharp absorption bands at 1116.89 and 639.52 cm−1 are ascribed to the O–S–O bond.

3.3.4. TG-DSC

TG-DSC curves (Figure 18) of the hydrothermal product exhibit three stages of pronounced weight loss and endothermic effect, respectively. Table 7 compares the weight losses of the hydrothermal product and theoretical values. The first stage of weight loss (7.9%) in the temperature range of 306–377 °C corresponds to the loss of crystal water (Equation (13)). The second stage of weight loss (20.0%) in the temperature range of 386–641 °C corresponds to the loss of hydroxyl water (Equation (14)). The last stage of weight loss (17.8%) in the temperature range of 897–1029 °C corresponds to the desulfation of MgSO4·5MgO (Equation (15)).
The thermal decomposition reactions of the hydrothermal product can be expressed as:
MgSO4·5Mg(OH)2·2H2O = MgSO4·5Mg(OH)2 + 2H2O
MgSO4·5Mg(OH)2 = MgSO4·5MgO + 5H2O
MgSO4·5MgO = 6MgO + SO3

4. Conclusions

High-quality 512MHSH whiskers were prepared from the MgO-enriched residue derived from ludwigite ore by sulfuric acid leaching followed by hydrothermal synthesis. The conclusions can be drawn as follows.
  • During the sulfuric acid leaching of MgO-enriched residue, silica could be effectively separated from magnesium by leaching with 40 wt % sulfuric acid at 80 °C for 90 min with a liquid-solid ratio of 4 mL/g. The leaching ratio of magnesium reached about 98.2% while 99.6% of silica was removed and enriched in the leaching residue. Furthermore, value-added products of silica gel with 67.7% SiO2 was prepared from the acid leaching residue.
  • The impurities in acidic leachate could be well removed under the conditions of pH of 5.7, reaction time of 30 min and reaction temperature of 60 °C. The magnesium retention ratio was 98.1%, and the iron removal ratio was 99.6 %. Iron oxide red could be obtained as a byproduct from the precipitate.
  • 512MHSH whiskers with a length of 30–100 μm, an average diameter of 0.5–1.0 μm and an aspect ratio of 100 were obtained by hydrothermal synthesis at 160–180 °C for 2.0–4.0 h using the mixed aqueous solution of 2.5–3.0 mol/L MgSO4 and 1.0 mol/L NaOH solution with a fixed MgSO4/NaOH mole ratio of 2. The whiskers were featured by smooth surface and small diameter.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their thanks to the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51234008) for financial support. This work was also financially supported by the Co-Innovation Center for Clean and Efficient Utilization of Strategic Metal Mineral Resources.

Author Contributions

Guanghui Li, Mingjun Rao and Zhiwei Peng conceived and designed the experiments; Li Fang and Binjun Liang performed the experiments and analyzed the data; Xin Zhang contributed analysis tools; Guanghui Li, Li Fang, Mingjun Rao, Zhiwei Peng and Tao Jiang wrote and reviewed the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Kang, K.H.; Lee, D.K. Synthesis of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers using triethanolamine as a morphology control agent. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2580–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, X.X.; Xu, D.L.; Xue, D.F. SO42− ions direct the one-dimensional growth of 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O. Acta Mater. 2007, 55, 5747–5757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dang, L.; Nai, X.Y.; Zhu, D.H.; Jing, Y.W.; Liu, X.; Dong, Y.P.; Li, W. Study on the mechanism of surface modification of magnesium oxysulfate whisker. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 317, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, D.H.; Nai, X.; Lan, S.; Bian, S.; Liu, X.; Li, W. Surface modification of magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate whiskers using a silane coupling agent by dry process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 390, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ding, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, S.; Huang, X.; Yu, W.; Qian, Y. Preparation and characterization of magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate whiskers. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 2845–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, X.L.; Ning, G.Q.; Qi, C.L.; Gao, J.S. One-step synthesis of basic magnesium sulfate whiskers by atmospheric pressure reflux. Particuology 2016, 24, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sun, X.T.; Xiang, L. Hydrothermal conversion of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers to magnesium hydroxide nanobelts. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2008, 109, 381–385. [Google Scholar]
  8. Wang, X.L.; Xue, D.F. Direct observation of the shape evolution of MgO whiskers in a solution system. Mater. Lett. 2006, 60, 3160–3164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wei, Z.Q.; Qi, H.; Ma, P.H.; Bao, J.Q. A new route to prepare magnesium oxide whisker. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2002, 5, 147–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, C.H.; Li, X.G.; Feng, L.J.; Lu, S.Y.; Liu, J.Y. Surface modification and characterization of magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate nanowhiskers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2010, 256, 3234–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xiang, L.; Liu, F.; Li, J.; Jin, Y. Hydrothermal formation and characterization of magnesium oxysulfate whiskers. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2004, 87, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhao, Y.; Liu, B.; Yang, J.J.; Jia, J.P.; You, C.; Chen, M.F. Effects of modifying agents on surface modifications of magnesium oxide whiskers. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 388, 370–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Y.; Liu, B.; You, C.; Chen, M.F. Effects of MgO whiskers on mechanical properties and crystallization behavior of PLLA/MgO composites. Mater. Des. 2016, 89, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Liu, C.J.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Y.G.; Shi, P.Y.; Jiang, M.F. Hydrothermal synthesis of calcium sulfate whisker from flue gas desulfurization gypsum. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 24, 1552–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, Z.Z.; Deng, Y.L. Solution synthesis of magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate nanobelts using sparingly soluble carbonate salts as supersaturation control agents. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 316, 183–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ding, Y.; Zhao, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, G.; Wu, H.; Qian, Y. Superstructured magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate fibres—Photoluminescence study. Int. J. Inorg. Mater. 2001, 3, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, C.H.; Li, X.G.; Feng, L.J.; Xiang, Z.C.; Zhang, D.H. Preparation and thermal decomposition of 5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O nanowhiskers. J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 150, 551–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Su, X.L.; Sun, C.M.; Chen, Y.X.; Zeng, T. Preparation of basic magnesium sulfate whisker by serpentine mine tailings solid wastes. Bull. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2014, 33, 92–96. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  19. An, J.; Xue, X.X. Life cycle environmental impact assessment of borax and boric acid production in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 66, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ning, Z.Q.; Zhai, Y.C.; Song, Q.S. Extracting B2O3 from calcined boron mud using molten sodium hydroxide. Rare Met. 2015, 34, 744–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, G.; Xue, Q.G.; Wang, J.S. Effect of Na2CO3 on reduction and melting separation of ludwigite/coal composite pellet and property of boron-rich slag. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2016, 26, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, X.J.; Zhao, J.Q.; Chen, S.Y.; Liu, Z.G.; Guo, T.L.; Chu, M.S. Comprehensive Utilization of Ludwigite Ore Based on Metallizing Reduction and Magnetic Separation. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2015, 22, 672–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, Y.L.; Qu, J.K.; Wei, G.Y.; Qi, T. Influence of Na2CO3 as Additive on Direct Reduction of Boron-bearing Magnetite Concentrate. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2016, 23, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ren, W.; Ye, J.; Wang, X.; Gong, W.; Lin, Y.; Ning, G. Study on preparation of basic magnesium sulfate whiskers from boron slurry. Inorg. Chem. Ind. 2010, 42, 56–59. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Jie, L.I.; Fan, Z.G.; Liu, Y.L.; Liu, S.L.; Tao, J.; Xi, Z.P. Preparation of boric acid from low-grade ascharite and recovery of magnesium sulfate. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2010, 20, 1161–1165. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liang, B.; Li, G.; Rao, M.; Peng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, T. Water leaching of boron from soda-ash-activated ludwigite ore. Hydrometallurgy 2017, 167, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, G.; Liang, B.; Rao, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, T. An innovative process for extracting boron and simultaneous recovering metallic iron from ludwigite ore. Miner. Eng. 2014, 56, 57–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Luo, Z.; Yang, J.; Ma, H.W.; Liu, M.T.; Ma, X. Recovery of magnesium and potassium from biotite by sulfuric acid leaching and alkali precipitation with ammonia. Hydrometallurgy 2015, 157, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Process for extracting iron and boron from ludwigite ore [27].
Figure 1. Process for extracting iron and boron from ludwigite ore [27].
Minerals 07 00138 g001
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the MgO-enriched residue.
Figure 2. XRD pattern of the MgO-enriched residue.
Minerals 07 00138 g002
Figure 3. Experimental flow sheet for preparing magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate (MHSH) whiskers by using MgO-enriched residue.
Figure 3. Experimental flow sheet for preparing magnesium hydroxide sulfate hydrate (MHSH) whiskers by using MgO-enriched residue.
Minerals 07 00138 g003
Figure 4. Extraction of magnesium as the function of (a) leaching temperature; (b) liquid-to-solid ratio; (c) leaching time; and (d) sulfuric acid concentration.
Figure 4. Extraction of magnesium as the function of (a) leaching temperature; (b) liquid-to-solid ratio; (c) leaching time; and (d) sulfuric acid concentration.
Minerals 07 00138 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of acid leaching residue.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of acid leaching residue.
Minerals 07 00138 g005
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the precipitate (a) before and (b) after calcination (F-Fe2O3).
Figure 6. XRD patterns of the precipitate (a) before and (b) after calcination (F-Fe2O3).
Minerals 07 00138 g006
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4 concentrations (a) 1.5 mol/L; (b) 2.25 mol/L; (c) 2.5 mol/L; (d) 3.0 mol/L.
Figure 7. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4 concentrations (a) 1.5 mol/L; (b) 2.25 mol/L; (c) 2.5 mol/L; (d) 3.0 mol/L.
Minerals 07 00138 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4 concentrations H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4 concentrations H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O.
Minerals 07 00138 g008
Figure 9. Morphologies of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4/NaOH mole ratios (a) 3:1; (b) 2:1; (c) 1:1; (d) 1:2.
Figure 9. Morphologies of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4/NaOH mole ratios (a) 3:1; (b) 2:1; (c) 1:1; (d) 1:2.
Minerals 07 00138 g009
Figure 10. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4/NaOH mole ratios (H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O).
Figure 10. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different MgSO4/NaOH mole ratios (H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O).
Minerals 07 00138 g010
Figure 11. SEM images of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal temperatures (a) 120 °C; (b) 140 °C; (c) 160 °C; (d) 180 °C; (e) 200 °C.
Figure 11. SEM images of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal temperatures (a) 120 °C; (b) 140 °C; (c) 160 °C; (d) 180 °C; (e) 200 °C.
Minerals 07 00138 g011
Figure 12. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal temperatures H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O.
Figure 12. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal temperatures H-Mg(OH)2, S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O, M-MgSO4·xH2O.
Minerals 07 00138 g012
Figure 13. Morphologies of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal durations (a) 0.5 h; (b) 2 h; (c) 4 h; (d) 7 h.
Figure 13. Morphologies of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal durations (a) 0.5 h; (b) 2 h; (c) 4 h; (d) 7 h.
Minerals 07 00138 g013
Figure 14. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal periods of time S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O.
Figure 14. XRD patterns of whiskers obtained at different hydrothermal periods of time S-5Mg(OH)2·MgSO4·2H2O.
Minerals 07 00138 g014
Figure 15. XRD pattern of the hydrothermal product.
Figure 15. XRD pattern of the hydrothermal product.
Minerals 07 00138 g015
Figure 16. EDS spectra of the hydrothermal product.
Figure 16. EDS spectra of the hydrothermal product.
Minerals 07 00138 g016
Figure 17. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy FI-IR pattern of the hydrothermal product.
Figure 17. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy FI-IR pattern of the hydrothermal product.
Minerals 07 00138 g017
Figure 18. Thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry TG-DSC curves of the hydrothermal product.
Figure 18. Thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry TG-DSC curves of the hydrothermal product.
Minerals 07 00138 g018
Table 1. Main chemical composition of MgO-enriched non-magnetic material (wt %).
Table 1. Main chemical composition of MgO-enriched non-magnetic material (wt %).
MgOSiO2Na2OFeB2O3Al2O3CaO1 LOI
43.5416.0712.035.911.580.982.5215.18
1 LOI is the mass loss on ignition.
Table 2. Main chemical composition of acid leaching residue (wt %).
Table 2. Main chemical composition of acid leaching residue (wt %).
CompositionsSiO2MgOFe2O3Al2O3CaSO4Na2OB2O3LOI
content/%67.761.632.540.2813.980.420.0712.21
Table 3. Result of sulfuric acid leaching of MgO-enriched residue.
Table 3. Result of sulfuric acid leaching of MgO-enriched residue.
CompositionSiMgFeAlCaNaB
Acid leaching solution (g/L)0.05451.2911.290.961.6517.590.92
Leaching ratio (%)0.498.295.593.245.898.598.9
Table 4. Metal hydroxides precipitation pH value and solubility product constant Ksp value.
Table 4. Metal hydroxides precipitation pH value and solubility product constant Ksp value.
IonsFe3+Fe2+Al3+Mg2+
Starting precipitation pH1.66.53.39.4
Complete precipitation pH3.29.75.212.4
Ksp4.0 × 10−388.0 × 10−161.9 × 10−369.6 × 10−3
Table 5. Elemental concentration of purified solution (g/L).
Table 5. Elemental concentration of purified solution (g/L).
MgNaFeAlSiB
64.407.272.75 × 10−30.05 × 10−30.17 × 10−30.686
Table 6. Chemical composition of precipitate without calcination (wt %).
Table 6. Chemical composition of precipitate without calcination (wt %).
Al2O3SiO2Fe2O3CaOMgONa2OS
4.300.760.630.131.2702.02
Table 7. The comparison of mass loss of the product and theoretical value.
Table 7. The comparison of mass loss of the product and theoretical value.
StepDecomposition Temperature/°CTheoretical Weight Loss/%Hydrothermal Product Weight Loss/wt %
1306–3778.047.9
2386–64120.1020.0
3897–102917.8917.8

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, G.; Fang, L.; Zhang, X.; Liang, B.; Rao, M.; Peng, Z.; Jiang, T. Utilization of the MgO-Rich Residue Originated from Ludwigite Ore: Hydrothermal Synthesis of MHSH Whiskers. Minerals 2017, 7, 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7080138

AMA Style

Li G, Fang L, Zhang X, Liang B, Rao M, Peng Z, Jiang T. Utilization of the MgO-Rich Residue Originated from Ludwigite Ore: Hydrothermal Synthesis of MHSH Whiskers. Minerals. 2017; 7(8):138. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7080138

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Guanghui, Li Fang, Xin Zhang, Binjun Liang, Mingjun Rao, Zhiwei Peng, and Tao Jiang. 2017. "Utilization of the MgO-Rich Residue Originated from Ludwigite Ore: Hydrothermal Synthesis of MHSH Whiskers" Minerals 7, no. 8: 138. https://doi.org/10.3390/min7080138

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop