Genetic Optimization of the Y-Shaped Photonic Crystal NOT Logic Gate
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
- (1)
- Selection for crossover. It consists of choosing the fittest individuals in order to allow them to pass on their genes to the next generation. In our work, the selection was carried out by the roulette wheel method, using the characteristics of each individual (as opposed to a random selection of individuals with equal probability). This method prevents finding a local extremum and does not guarantee the selection of an individual with the best characteristics. This ensures genetic diversity (as opposed to choosing N best-fit individuals). The essence of the roulette wheel method is to compare the sector of the wheel of each individual. In this case, the size of the sector is proportional to the value of the efficiency of the individual and is found as , where is the value of the efficiency of an individual with number i. Thus, the higher the efficiency, the larger the sector allocated on the wheel of an individual and, consequently, the greater the chance that it will be selected for the next stage—crossover. Let us generate a random, uniformly distributed number from 0 to 1, which will later be compared with the sectors of the wheel and set the selection result. Next, the cumulative sum for each sector is calculated as An individual is selected by comparing the cumulative sum and a random number : if lies between and , then an individual will be selected. In this way, N parental individuals are selected. Moreover, one individual can be chosen as a parent an unlimited number of times.
- (2)
- Crossover. As a result of this stage, a new generation is created by exchanging genes between parents. To obtain a new (daughter) individual , parental individuals and selected as a result of the first stage are subjected to single-point crossover. A random, discrete, uniformly distributed value k, which sets the crossover point, is selected (, where M is the number of genes in one individual). The crossover point is the point relative to which the genes are exchanged. As a result, the daughter individual contains the first k genes of the first parent and the subsequent M-k genes of the second parent. Note that each parent participates in the crossover process twice: for the next iteration, the parent is already the first parent for the child . The last child individual is formed as a result of crossover individuals (first parent) and (second parent).
- (3)
- Mutation. Some of the new descendants may undergo mutation, replacing the value of the gene with a random one. This stage is necessary to ensure genetic diversity and prevent convergence to a local extremum. To implement this stage, with a given probability, , genes are selected from the entire daughter population, and their values are replaced by a random one from the range set for each specific gene.
- (4)
- Formation of the next generation. As a result of the previous stages, the individual with the best features may be “lost”. To ensure that the new generation will be exactly as good as the parent, it is suggested that several parent individuals be left in the next generation. To perform this, the efficiency of individual children is calculated. The next generation is formed from the best n percent of the offspring individuals in terms of efficiency and 100-n percent of the individuals of the previous generation.
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Kumar, N.; Suthar, B. Advances in Photonic Crystals and Devices; CRC Press: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Hussein, H.M.E.; Ali, T.A.; Rafat, N.H. New designs of a complete set of Photonic Crystals logic gates. Opt. Commun. 2018, 411, 175–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vivien, L.; Pavesi, L. Handbook of Silicon Photonics; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Hopman, W.C.L.; Ay, F.; Hu, W.; Gadgil, V.J.; Kuipers, L.; Pollnau, M.; de Ridder, R.M. Focused ion beam scan routine, dwell time and dose optimizations for submicrometre period planar photonic crystal components and stamps in silicon. Nanotechnology 2007, 18, 195305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvaraja, S.K.; Jaenen, P.; Bogaerts, W.; Van Thourhout, D.; Dumon, P.; Baets, R. Fabrication of Photonic Wire and Crystal Circuits in Silicon-on-Insulator Using 193-nm Optical Lithography. J. Light. Technol. 2009, 27, 4076–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serajmohammadi, S.; Absalan, H. All optical nand gate based on nonlinear photonic crystal ring resonator. Inf. Process. Agric. 2016, 3, 119–123. [Google Scholar]
- D’souza, N.M.; Mathew, V. Interference based square lattice photonic crystal logic gates working with different wavelengths. Opt. Laser Technol. 2016, 80, 214–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saidani, N.; Belhadj, W.; AbdelMalek, F. Novel all-optical logic gates based photonic crystal waveguide using selfimaging phenomena. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2015, 47, 1829–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, X.-W.; Yang, X.-L.; Meng, X.-F.; Zhu, J.-N.; Wang, Y.-R.; Yin, Y.-K.; Dong, G.-Y. Design and analysis of logic NOR, NAND and XNOR gates based on interference effect. Quantum Electron. 2018, 48, 178. [Google Scholar]
- Yu-Chi, J.; Shao-Bin, L.; Hai-Feng, Z.; Xiang-Kun, K. Realization of all optical half-adder based on self-collimated beams by two-dimensional photonic crystals. Opt. Commun. 2015, 348, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
- Rani, P.; Kalra, Y.; Sinha, R.K. Realization of AND gate in Y shaped photonic crystal waveguide. Opt. Commun. 2013, 298–299, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soifer, V.A. Diffractive Nanophotonics; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Mokshin, P.V.; Golovashkin, D.L.; Pavelyev, V.S. Iterative approach based on the FDTD method for the design of metal-dielectric photonic crystal devices. In Proceedings of the 2022 VIII International Conference on Information Technology and Nanotechnology (ITNT), Samara, Russia, 23–27 May 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Watanabe, Y.; Ikeda, N.; Sugimoto, Y. Topology optimization of waveguide bends with wide, flat bandwidth in air-bridge-type photonic crystal slabs. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 113108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, L.; Wu, H.; Jia, W. Optimization of low-loss and wide-band sharp photonic crystal waveguide bends using the genetic algorithm. Optik 2013, 124, 1721–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokshin, P.V.; Golovashkin, D.L.; Pavelyev, V.S. Interference logic elements based on Y- shaped photonic crystal waveguide. Comput. Optics, 2023; in print. [Google Scholar]
- Agafonov, A.N.; Volodkin, B.O.; Kachalov, D.G.; Knyazev, B.A.; Kropotov, G.I.; Tukmakov, K.N.; Pavelyev, V.S.; Tsypishka, D.I.; Choporova, Y.Y.; Kaveev, A.K. Focusing of Novosibirsk Free Electron Laser (NovoFEL) radiation into paraxial segment. J. Mod. Opt. 2016, 63, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krivosheeva, Y.Y.; Golovashkin, D.L. Design of waveguide photonic-crystal structures with bends using a genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Mathematical and Computer Modeling of Natural-Science and Social Problems, Penza, Russia, 1–4 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Soshnikov, D.V.; Golovashkin, D.L.; Pavelyev, V.S. Evaluation of the influence of technological manufacturing errors on the operation of photonic-crystal waveguides. In Proceedings of the XVII International Conference on Analytical and Numerical Methods of Modelling of Natural Science and Social Problems, Penza, Russia, 28 November–4 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Tsuruda, K.; Fujita, M.; Nagatsuma, T. Extremely low-loss terahertz waveguide based on silicon photonic-crystal slab. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 31977–31990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dutta, H.S.; Goyal, A.K.; Srivastava, V.; Pal, S. Coupling light in photonic crystal waveguides: A review. Photonics Nanostructures Fundam. Appl. 2016, 20, 41–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotlyar, V.V.; Triandofilov, Y.R.; Kovalev, A.A.; Kotlyar, M.I.; Volkov, A.V.; Volodkin, B.O.; Soifer, V.A.; O’Faolain, L.; Krauss, T. Photonic crystal lens for coupling of two planar waveguides. Comput. Opt. 2008, 32, 326–337. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, S.G.; Manolatou, C.; Fan, S.; Villeneuve, P.R.; Joannopoulos, J.D.; Haus, H.A. Elimination of cross talk in waveguide intersections. Opt. Lett. 1998, 23, 1855–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Z.; Shen, L.; Yu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, X. Highly efficient photonic-crystal splitters based on one-way waveguiding. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 2013, 30, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Efficiency at the Element Output | Optimal Parameters of Radii and Displacements, µm | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
log. 1 | log. 0 | r1 | r2 | r3 | r4 | d1 | d2 | d3 | d4 |
0.99 | 0 | 0.14 | 0.17 | 0.05 | 0.12 | −0.10 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
Efficiency at the Element Output | Optimal Parameters of Radii and Displacements, µm | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
log. 1 | log. 0 | r1 | r2 | r3 | r4 | d1 | d2 | d3 | d4 |
0.95 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 0.16 | 0.19 | −0.15 | −0.03 | −0.15 | −0.08 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pavelyev, V.; Krivosheeva, Y.; Golovashkin, D. Genetic Optimization of the Y-Shaped Photonic Crystal NOT Logic Gate. Photonics 2023, 10, 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10101173
Pavelyev V, Krivosheeva Y, Golovashkin D. Genetic Optimization of the Y-Shaped Photonic Crystal NOT Logic Gate. Photonics. 2023; 10(10):1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10101173
Chicago/Turabian StylePavelyev, Vladimir, Yuliana Krivosheeva, and Dimitriy Golovashkin. 2023. "Genetic Optimization of the Y-Shaped Photonic Crystal NOT Logic Gate" Photonics 10, no. 10: 1173. https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics10101173