Next Article in Journal
Bias-Voltage Stabilizer for HVHF Amplifiers in VHF Pulse-Echo Measurement Systems
Next Article in Special Issue
First Spaceborne SAR-GMTI Experimental Results for the Chinese Gaofen-3 Dual-Channel SAR Sensor
Previous Article in Journal
A New Polar Transfer Alignment Algorithm with the Aid of a Star Sensor and Based on an Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filter
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Mode GF-3 Satellite Image Geometric Accuracy Verification Using the RPC Model
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The SAR Payload Design and Performance for the GF-3 Mission

Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2017, 17(10), 2419; https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102419
Submission received: 31 August 2017 / Revised: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 19 October 2017 / Published: 23 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue First Experiences with Chinese Gaofen-3 SAR Sensor)

Abstract

:
This paper describes the C-band multi-polarization Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensor for the Gaofen-3 (GF-3) mission. Based on the requirement analysis, the design of working modes and SAR payload are given. An accurate antenna model is introduced for the pattern optimization and SAR performance calculation. The paper concludes with an overview of predicted performance which was verified by in-orbit tests.

1. Introduction

Gaofen is one program announced in a 15-year plan of Chinese national science and technology programs between 2006 and 2020. Within the Gaofen program, GF-3 is a spaceborne multi-polarization imaging radar mission in C-band.
The GF-3 satellite is circling the Earth in a sun-synchronous dusk-dawn orbit at a 755 km altitude with an inclination of 98.411°, the repeat cycle of orbit is about 29 days. With its multi-polarization C-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensor, GF-3 is able to image the Earth’s surface in all weather conditions and regardless of day or night [1,2].
GF-3 is designed for many areas which include sea and ocean monitoring, disaster reduction, water conservancy, and meteorology. Its primary users are the State Oceanic Administration (SOA), the China Meteorological Administration (CMA), the Ministry of Civil Affairs, and the Ministry of Water Resources. A wide variety of data products with different image characteristics are required by the different users, which introduces great challenges in the SAR system design.
Section 2 contains an overview and analysis of the multi-user requirements for GF-3. Section 3 describes the working mode design, followed by the SAR payload design in Section 4. In Section 5, an accurate antenna model is discussed. The performance of the SAR sensor is presented in Section 6, and conclusions are given in Section 7.

2. Requirements

In order to meet the multi-user technical requirements, twelve observing modes were proposed, as listed in Table 1.
The resolution varies from 1 m to 500 m, and the swath varies from 10 km to 650 km. The SAR payload has to support operation in single-polarization (HH or VV), dual-polarization (HH+HV or VH+VV), and quad-polarization (HH+HV+VH+VV) with respect to the observing modes. These characteristics, which vary largely due to multi-user requirements, present great challenges to the SAR system design.
To obtain 1 m azimuth resolution in P mode, sliding spotlight technology is utilized, which means the SAR payload has to provide fast antenna beam steering in the azimuth. The large swath modes have to be implemented as ScanSAR modes which means a fast beam scanning capability in elevation. To obtain 3 m azimuth resolution and continuous measurements in the UF mode, the equivalent azimuth antenna size should be less than 6 m according to the SAR imaging principle. To meet the requirement of high Doppler bandwidth sampling and ambiguity in UF mode, the SAR payload has to transmit in one beam and receive in two beams with different phase centers. In the E mode, the incidence angle is out of the scale of other modes, i.e., larger beam scan angle in the case of fixed embedded antenna. In this case, the sidelobes of the antenna beams have to be low enough to satisfy the ambiguity requirement.
Considering all items listed above, an active phased array antenna is employed, with a 15 m (azimuth) × 1.232 m (elevation). This allows the fast scanning of the antenna beam both in elevation and azimuth, and it can obtain low sidelobes in the case of large scan angle by amplitude and phase optimization. Two Rx channels are necessary for the dual-polarization modes and time-division quad-polarization modes, as well as the single-polarization dual-beam receiving mode, i.e., the UF mode. A microwave switch unit is needed for switching the input signal from the antenna to the two Rx channels.

3. Working Modes

3.1. Observing Modes

From the perspective of SAR imaging technology, the 12 observing modes can be classified into six groups.

3.1.1. P Mode

P mode employs sliding spotlight [3] technology to raise the azimuth resolution (1 m) at the cost of observing discontinuity. In this mode, only half of the whole antenna aperture in the azimuth, i.e., 7.5 m, is used, which can be any two adjacent panels (A + B or B + C or C + D, which will be described in Section 4.1 and Section 4.2), and in the meanwhile, the other two panels are powered off to reduce the power consumption. With the maximum beam scanning angle of ± 1.9°, a 1 m resolution in the 10 km azimuth imaging length is guaranteed. In elevation, chirp signal with 240 MHz bandwidth achieves 2.29 m~0.98 m ground resolution with respect to 20°~50° incidence angle.

3.1.2. UF Mode

UF mode works in the single-transmit multiple-receive (SIMO) [4] method to reduce the minimum Pulse Repeat Frequency (PRF) needed for Doppler bandwidth, consequently improving the ambiguity. Only half of the whole antenna aperture in the azimuth is used, the same as in P mode, but some differences exist in detail of usage. In UF mode, B + C antenna panels are used in transmitting power, and the azimuth width of the transmitting beam is broadened 1.7 times to fit the receiving beam. B panel and C panel receive backscattering signals separately, which form a two-beam receiving mechanism in order to reduce PRF by means of increasing space sampling. Accordingly, the two Rx channels are supposed to be switched to the signals of two antenna panels in the same polarization.

3.1.3. Quad-Polarization Stripmap Modes

The quad-polarization stripmap [5] modes, i.e., Q and WQ modes, work in time-division operation architecture [6,7]. The SAR system transmits Horizontal (H) or Vertical (V) polarization pulses in alternate Pulse Repeat Frequency (PRF), whereas it receives backscattering signals in both H and V polarizations. Furthermore, inverse modulation slopes are employed in chirp signal transmitting of H and V polarization. As shown in Figure 1, the H polarization transmitting signal is modulated in the positive slope, and, correspondingly, the V polarization is modulated in the negative slope. The inverse slopes in signal modulation can effectively suppress the cross-polarization ambiguity generated by strong back-scattering ground objects.
All antenna aperture is used in transmitting and receiving. The differences in realization between Q and WQ modes are the partial parameters used in measurement, such as beam pointing and width, signal bandwidth, and looks in image processing with respect to the resolution and swath requirements of the two modes.

3.1.4. WV Mode

WV mode also works in time-division quad-polarization operation architecture, but is different in measurement continuity from the other two quad-polarization modes (Q, WQ). It measures a series of small square areas which are dispersed along one or two incidence angles [8,9]. WV mode is actually a discrete sample mode for a large-scale homogeneous earth surface, generally the sea surface. The SAR payload can work in WV mode for more than 50 min in one acquisition because its discontinuous operation reduces the average power and data column tremendously. WV mode uses the same antenna beams as Q mode. Measurement duration and acquisition time are precisely controlled according to the size of the single observing area (5 km × 5 km normally) and spacing between neighboring areas (50 km normally).

3.1.5. Dual-Polarization Stripmap Modes

The F, WF, S, E modes obtain dual-polarization measurements in the stripmap method. The main differences among these modes are parameters used in measurement, including beam pointing and width, signal bandwidth, and looks in image processing with respect to the resolution and swath requirements. E mode is special because its incidence angle is out of the scale of other modes, which can expand the observing capability to some extent in order to reduce the revisiting interval time.

3.1.6. ScanSAR Modes

The NS, WS, G modes work in the ScanSAR [10] method to cover a larger swath. They use the same antenna beams as the S mode which covers an approximately 130 km swath in every beam. Considering the overlap between adjacent beams, NS, WS, and G modes employ three, five, and seven adjacent beams, respectively, to compose the required swath. It is worth mentioning that G mode can work for more than 30 min in one acquisition, since the power consumption is reduced considerably by cutting down the transmitting duty cycle (about 1.6%), and the data rate is very low by using 2 MHz signal bandwidth.

3.2. Inner Calibration Modes

Besides these observing modes, several inner calibration modes are designed to acquire the performance and operating states of the SAR payload. Unlike the external calibration, the inner calibration is supposed to be carried out before and after every observing operation, and even be interjected into the midst of the observing operation, which means monitoring the performance of the SAR payload more frequently.

4. SAR Payload Design

4.1. Overview

Based on the implementation details of working mode designs, SAR payload is designed. Table 2 provides a brief overview of SAR payload key parameters.
The antenna was divided into four panels which can be powered up separately in order to meet the demand of antenna aperture size coming from the complicated observing modes. The four panels are mounted in a folded configuration at the two opposite sides of the spacecraft before launch, as shown in Figure 2.
After launching and orbit adjusting, a deployable mechanism deploys the panels from a stowed launch configuration into its deployed in-orbit configuration. Before SAR operation, the antenna has to point to −31.5° (right-looking) or +31.5° (left-looking) relying on the roll steering of the satellite platform; this dual-side looking capacity is valuable in reducing the revisit interval time. Zero Doppler steering [11,12,13], which employs yaw and pitch steering to eliminate doppler center frequency shift, was introduced to GF-3.
The SAR payload of the GF-3 satellite are composed of two major subsystems: the antenna subsystem and the electronics subsystem.

4.2. SAR Antenna Subsystem

SAR payload employs a deployable planar active phased array antenna [14] which is 15 m (azimuth) × 1.232 m (elevation) in size. The antenna consists of 1536 transmit-receive channels, which are organized in 24 columns (azimuth) and 64 rows (elevation), and distributed over four panels.
Figure 3 shows the electric block diagram of the SAR antenna subsystem.
The power of the whole antenna is supplied by two Antenna Power Units (APU), which distribute a power bus to four antenna panels and control the aperture configuration by enabling or disabling the direct current (DC) converter in each panel.
The Antenna Interface Unit (AIU) controls all antenna beam forming and steering functions by receiving commands from the electronics subsystem, interpreting the commands, and distributing the beam control commands to four panels in the form of data bus. The phase and gain settings of all elevation beams, including 205 right-looking and 205 left-looking beams, are stored in AIU. The AIU obtains the phase and gain settings of the azimuth steering beam by means of in-orbit calculation.
Transmitting Gain and Circulator Units (TGCU) amplify the transmitting signals received from electronics subsystem to drive the antenna, receive signals from the antenna, and send them to the electronics subsystem. Circulators are involved to separate the transmitting and receiving routes interfacing with the electronics subsystem. Two TGCUs are used to drive and receive from the antenna for H and V polarization respectively.
When transmitting, the signal waveform is amplified by the Radio Frequency (RF) power amplifier and split by a 1:2 divider in TGCU to drive the H or V polarization antenna. The selection of transmitting polarization can be easily applied by enabling the corresponding amplifier located in TGCU. The polarization selection of antenna panels by timing control is also necessary since it can raise the cross-polarization isolation. The H or V polarization signals received from the A and B panels are combined, named HAB or VAB, and then split into two signals, in order to form redundant RF routes to raise the system reliability, as well as signals from the C and D panels.
An electrical block diagram of one antenna panel is given in Figure 4. At the panel level, RF interconnection between the columns and the rest of the radar is provided by three identical 1:6 power dividers. The control bus and power bus are distributed from panel ports to six column modules.
The antenna is a modulated design that defines a column as a standard module, which consists of one Column Interface Unit (CIU), one Column Power Unit (CPU), eight Time Delay Units (TDU), 16 Transmit-Receive Modules (TRM), 32 dual-polarization radiators, three power dividers, and the elevation plane distribution network.
At the column module level, two 1:4 and one 1:32 power dividers are used to interface with the rest of the antenna panel in the RF path. The 1:4 divider distributes H or V signals to the TDU for transmission, and combines the received signals from the TDU ports into H or V output column RF ports. The 1:32 divider is placed between the TRM calibration ports and the column calibration port to distribute or combine H and V inner calibration signals.
Four Transmit-Receive (TR) channels are embedded in one TRM with only one interface with the TDU. Each patch radiator has H and V feeds, which are completely separate on transmitting and signal reception, and connects with two TR channels in H and V polarization, respectively.
The waveguide slot radiator [15] is used to reduce cross polarization and raise radiation efficiency. The selected row spacing of the radiator enables the antenna with a ±20° scanning angle in elevation without exciting grating lobes, which is sufficient and necessary for covering the look angle requirement by twelve observing modes, especially E mode. However, column spacing of the radiator is hard to fit the strict requirements of low grating lobes in the case of a ±1.9° scanning angle in the azimuth needed by the P mode. Fortunately, the grating lobe can be kept from deteriorating in azimuth ambiguity by selecting the proper PRF.
CIU receives commands and timing signals of H and V polarization from AIU. After being interpreted and converted, commands and timing signals are issued to 8 TDUs and 16 TRMs to control beam formation and the transmit-receive switch. CPU converts high-voltage DC power to low-voltage DC power, and distributes it to all active units in the column, including TDUs, TRMs, CIUs.

4.3. SAR Electronics Subsystem

The SAR electronics subsystem has the redundant design in most components, it provides the following functions:
  • Redundancy control, scheduling, mode definition, timing control;
  • Transmitted signal generation;
  • Received signal conditioning;
  • Quantization, data compression, data formatting.
Figure 5 gives an electric diagram of the SAR electronics subsystem.
By means of the communication bus, the Control and Timing Unit (CTU) receives commands from the satellite platform and sends state monitoring data to it. CTU controls the powering up, timing sequence, observing process, and configuration of the SAR payload. In the meantime, the AIU monitors the operating state of the electronics subsystem and the operating state of the antenna subsystem through a specialized data bus.
The Power Distributor Unit (PDU) distributes the platform power bus to all units of the SAR electronics subsystem, as well as AIU and TGCUs of the antenna subsystem, and powers up these units under the control of the CTU and satellite platform. Considering the various demands of the secondary power supply, the DC-DC converters are scattered in the other units instead of being assembled in the PDU.
Based on a high stability oscillator, a Frequency Generating Unit (FGU) generates the synchronous reference frequency signals needed by other units. According to the pulse width, bandwidth, modulation slope, and timing control received from the CTU, the Linear frequency modulated signal Generating Unit (LGU) employs in-orbit real-time calculations to generate the chirp signal waveforms and sends it to the TGCU and Inner Calibration Unit (ICU) after modulation, up-conversion, filtering, and amplifying. On account of the multiple bandwidth demands, eight-bandwidth filtering is supported by the filter bank in LGU.
The four RF signals (HAB, HCD, VAB, and VCD) received from the antenna system are selected or combined in the Channel Switch Unit (CSU) according to the observing modes. In the UF mode, HAB and HCD are selected as the two output signals of the CSU when observing in H single polarization, as well as VAB and VCD in V polarization. In other modes, HAB and HCD are combined into one output of CSU, as well as VAB and VCD are combined to be another one.
Containing two parallel receiver channels, the Dual-channel Receiver Unit (DRU) down-converts the two RF signals into Intermediate Frequency (IF) with selected gain which is controlled by the Data Acquisition and Forming Unit (DAFU). The gain of the DRU can be manually controlled, which means the gain setting responds to the ground command, or can be automatically controlled, which means the settings are adjusted automatically according to the in-orbit calculation results of the DAFU. The same IF filter banks as used in LGU are employed in DRU to cope with different bandwidth signals.
The IF signals are brought into analog-to-digital conversion directly in the DAFU with a sampling frequency of 533.33 MHz [16]. Signal demodulation and filtering are implemented in the digital domain. Down sampling is applied to cut down the SAR raw data rate in case of low signal bandwidth. The two data streams are compressed using 3-bit or 4-bit Block Adaptive Quantization (BAQ) algorithms or a high 4-bit interception algorithm. The selection of compression algorithms as well as the acquisition start time and duration is controlled by the CTU, which interprets the observation commands received from the satellite platform. The compressed data and auxiliary data are formatted according to the observing mode and compression method to form the SAR raw data package. In the inner calibration modes, the auxiliary data and the uncompressed data, which contain the replica of the transmitted waveform, are formatted to form the SAR raw data package.
Inner calibration is carried out in the SAR payload by forming transmit-receive closed RF loops which are achieved by the Inner Calibration Unit (ICU) and the calibration network. The ICU has RF switches, delayed and non-delayed RF paths, and interfaces with the LGU, antenna, and the TGCU. RF loops are formed and switched by controlling the state of the RF switches in the ICU.

5. Antenna Model

Before the antenna patterns were tested, they were simulated using a detailed antenna electric model which was built on the basis of component test data. The model was used in beam optimization to obtain better SAR performance. In the antenna pattern test stage, the model was verified and amended by comparing the tested patterns and the simulated patterns. Figure 6 gives the comparison of the simulated patterns and the tested patterns of Q mode beams in H polarization, which shows maximum 0.2 dB deviation exists within the valid main lobe range corresponding to the imaging area. Moreover, Figure 7 gives the comparison of the simulated patterns and the tested patterns of the Q1 beam in H polarization, which shows good consistency within the full elevation range.
The accurate electric model of the antenna is not only advantageous to the beam optimization, but also to reducing the test time of the antenna patterns as the beams are quite a few due to the 12 observing modes. In the future, it would be useful to carry out some experiment modes in orbit. The performance of experiment modes can be calculated using this antenna model. Based on the good consistency, the antenna pattern simulation and the configuration code generation can be implemented on the ground, since the antenna patterns cannot be tested practically after satellite launching.

6. Performance

The predicted performance of the SAR sensor was determined by simulation in the system design stage. Based on the ground test results of the SAR payload, a more accurate performance was calculated before satellite launching, which was verified by in-orbit tests and evaluations, as shown in Table 3.
The azimuth and range ambiguity calculated in the 2D distributed target model is guaranteed by the selected antenna size and beam optimization. The thorough separation of RF routes in H and V polarization raises the polarization isolation performance. Low receiving noise figure, high-efficiency radiator, sufficient antenna gain, and high emission power all contribute to the NESZ. The properties listed in Table 3 are the worst case scenarios in the corresponding incidence scale of the observing modes.

7. Conclusions

The GF-3 satellite was launched from the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Centre on 10 August 2016. The first SAR observation was on 15 August 2016. Subsequently, in-orbit performance evaluation and product application tests were gradually carried out. GF-3 has been in operational application officially since January 2017.
With its multi-polarization C-band SAR sensor, GF-3 can operate in 12 different observing modes, from high-resolution mode (1 m/10 km) to extremely-wide-swath mode (500 m/650 km), from single to quad polarization. Relying on the steering of the satellite platform, all observing modes can be realized with dual-side looking capability, which can reduce the revisit interval time. Figure 8 and Figure 9 give two example images of Rennes city, France, in P mode and Q mode respectively.
Applications of the GF-3 image products in the various fields [17,18,19,20] demonstrate its excellent performance and important value. Two follow-up satellites of GF-3 will be launched and put into operation before 2020, some design parameters will be improved to meet the feedbacks collected from end-users.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association, Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant 2016118.

Author Contributions

Jili Sun wrote the manuscript, and Weidong Yu and Yunkai Deng revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Curlander, J.C.; McDonough, R.N. Synthetic Aperture Radar: System and Signal Processing; Jone Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhang, Q.J. Polarimetric Microwave Remote Sensing; China Aerospace Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Carrara, W.G.; Goodman, R.S.; Majewski, R.M. Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar; Artech House: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  4. Krieger, G.; Huber, S.; Villano, M.; de Almeida, F.Q.; Younis, M.; López-Dekker, P.; Prats, P.; Rodriguez-Cassola, M.; Moreira, A. SIMO and MIMO system architectures and modes for high-resolution ultra-wide-swath SAR imaging. In Proceedings of the EUSAR 2016: 11th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Hamburg, Germany, 6–9 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Munson, D.C.; Visentin, R.L. A signal processing view of strip-mapping synthetic aperture radar. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 1989, 37, 2131–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, B.W.; Wang, X.L.; Yang, R.L. The study of new operation modes for spaceborne polarimetric SAR system. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2000—IEEE 2000 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Honolulu, HI, USA, 24–28 July 2000; pp. 2316–2318. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zakharov, A.I. Comparison of multipolarization SAR systems depending on the way of the full scattering matrix measurements. In Proceedings of the IGARSS 2003—IEEE 2003 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Toulouse, France, 21–25 July 2003; pp. 4419–4421. [Google Scholar]
  8. Lehner, S.; Schulz-Stellenfleth, J.; Schttler, J.B.; Breit, H.; Horstmann, J. Wind and wave measurements using complex ERS-2 wave mode data. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2000, 38, 2246–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kerbaol, V.; Chapron, B.; Vachon, P.W. Analysis of ERS-1/2 synthetic aperture radar wave mode imagettes. J. Geophys. Res. 1998, 103, 7833–7846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Moore, R.K.; Claassen, J.P.; Lin, Y.H. Scanning spaceborne synthetic aperture radar with integrated radiometer. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1981, 17, 410–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fiedler, H.; Boerner, E.; Mittermayer, J.; Krieger, G. Total zero Doppler Steering—A new method for minimizing the Doppler centroid. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 2005, 2, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boerner, E.; Fiedler, H.; Krieger, G.; Mittermayer, J. A new method for Total Zero Doppler Steering. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, Anchorage, AK, USA, 20–24 September 2004; pp. 1526–1529. [Google Scholar]
  13. Fiedler, H.; Boerner, E.; Mittermayer, J.; Krieger, G. Total zero Doppler steering. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, Ulm, Germany, 25–27 May 2004; pp. 481–484. [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson, R.C.; Jasik, H. Antenna Engineering Handbook; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, W.; Zhong, S.S.; Zhang, Y.M.; Liang, X.L. A broadband slotted ridge waveguide antenna array. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2006, 8, 1567–1572. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ho, K.C.; Chan, Y.T.; Inkol, R. A digital quadrature demodulation system. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 1996, 32, 1218–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, J.; Qiu, X.; Hong, W. Automated ortho-rectified SAR image of GF-3 satellite using Reverse-Range-Doppler method. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Beijing, China, 10–15 July 2016; pp. 4445–4448. [Google Scholar]
  18. Shao, W.; Sheng, Y.; Sun, J. Preliminary assessment of wind and wave retrieval from Chinese Gaofen-3 SAR imagery. Sensors 2017, 17, 1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Pan, Z.; Liu, L.; Qiu, X.; Lei, B. Fast vessel detection in Gaofen-3 SAR images with ultrafine strip-map mode. Sensors 2017, 17, 1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jin, T.; Qiu, X.; Hu, D.; Ding, C. Unambiguous imaging of static scenes and moving targets with the first Chinese dual-channel spaceborne SAR sensor. Sensors 2017, 17, 1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Time-division operation architecture with Inverse modulation slopes.
Figure 1. Time-division operation architecture with Inverse modulation slopes.
Sensors 17 02419 g001
Figure 2. SAR antenna in stowed configuration.
Figure 2. SAR antenna in stowed configuration.
Sensors 17 02419 g002
Figure 3. The electric block diagram of the SAR antenna subsystem.
Figure 3. The electric block diagram of the SAR antenna subsystem.
Sensors 17 02419 g003
Figure 4. The electric block diagram of one antenna panel.
Figure 4. The electric block diagram of one antenna panel.
Sensors 17 02419 g004
Figure 5. The electric block diagram of the SAR electrics subsystem.
Figure 5. The electric block diagram of the SAR electrics subsystem.
Sensors 17 02419 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of simulated and tested patterns of Q mode within the valid main lobe range. (a) H-polarization transmitting beams; (b) H-polarization receiving beams.
Figure 6. Comparison of simulated and tested patterns of Q mode within the valid main lobe range. (a) H-polarization transmitting beams; (b) H-polarization receiving beams.
Sensors 17 02419 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of simulated and tested patterns of Q1 beam within the full elevation range. (a) H-polarization transmitting patterns; (b) H-polarization receiving patterns.
Figure 7. Comparison of simulated and tested patterns of Q1 beam within the full elevation range. (a) H-polarization transmitting patterns; (b) H-polarization receiving patterns.
Sensors 17 02419 g007aSensors 17 02419 g007b
Figure 8. P-mode image of Rennes city, France. (a) Whole image; (b) Partial enlarged view of red rectangle area in (a).
Figure 8. P-mode image of Rennes city, France. (a) Whole image; (b) Partial enlarged view of red rectangle area in (a).
Sensors 17 02419 g008aSensors 17 02419 g008b
Figure 9. Q-mode image of Rennes city, France.
Figure 9. Q-mode image of Rennes city, France.
Sensors 17 02419 g009
Table 1. Observing modes of Gaofen-3 (GF-3).
Table 1. Observing modes of Gaofen-3 (GF-3).
Observing ModeIncidence Angle (°)Nominal Resolution 1 (m)Nominal Swath (km)Polarization
Spotlight (P)20~50110 × 10 2Single
Ultra-fine stripmap (UF)20~50330Single
Fine stripmap (F)19~50550Dual
Wide fine stripmap (WF)19~5010100Dual
Standard stripmap (S)17~5025130Dual
Narrow ScanSAR (NS)17~5050300Dual
Wide ScanSAR (WS)17~50100500Dual
Global observation (G)17~53500650Dual
Quad-pol stripmap (Q)20~41830Quad
Wide quad-pol stripmap(WQ)20~382540Quad
Wave (WV)20~41105 × 5 2Quad
Expanded incidence angle(E)10~2025130Dual
50~602580Dual
1 After multi-look processing. 2 Image is discontinuous in azimuth, ×10 and ×5 refer to the azimuth length in one acquisition.
Table 2. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) payload key parameters.
Table 2. Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) payload key parameters.
ParameterValue
Center Frequency5.4 GHz
Polarizationsingle, dual, quad
Antenna Size15 m (A) × 1.232 m (E)
Number of Panels4
Array Columns (Azimuth)24
Array Rows (Elevation)64 (32 in H, 32 in V)
Radio Frequency (RF) Peak Power15,360 W
Average Power Consumption8000 W max
Pulse Width10–60 us (programmable)
Signal Bandwidth2~240 MHz (programmable)
Transmit Duty Cycle20% max
Receiver Noise Figure (at Module Input)2.5 dB max
Receiver Channels2
Pulse Repetition Frequency1000~6000 Hz (programmable)
Sampling Frequency533.33 MHz (IF sampling)
Quantization8 bits
Data CompressionBlock Adaptive Quantization (BAQ) 3 bits, BAQ 4 bits, High-4 bits, 8 bit (Selectable)
Output Data Rate1280 Mbps max
Table 3. SAR performance.
Table 3. SAR performance.
ParameterPropertiesComments
Polarization isolation≥35 dB
Polarization amplitude unbalance ≤0.26 dB,Fixed bias compensated
Polarization phase unbalance≤4.15°Fixed bias compensated
Noise Equivalent Sigma Zero (NESZ)≤−19.5 dBP, UF, F, WF, Q, WV modes
≤−21.3 dBS, NS, WS, G, WQ, E modes
Azimuth ambiguity≤−20.1 dBP, UF, F, WF, Q, WV modes
≤−18.8 dBS, NS, WS, G, WQ, E modes
Range ambiguity≤−20.0 dB
Peak Side Lobe Ratio (PSLR)≤−22.8 dBP, UF, F, WF, Q, WV modes
≤−20.5 dBS, NS, WS, G, WQ, E modes
Integrated Side Lobe Ratio (ISLR)≤−16.7 dBP, UF, F, WF, Q, WV modes
≤−15.3 dBS, NS, WS, G, WQ, E modes
Radiometric resolution≤3.50 dBP, UF, F, WF, Q, WV modes
≤1.89 dBS, NS, WS, G, WQ, E modes
Absolute radiometric error≤1.5 dB
Relative radiometric error≤1.0 dB

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, J.; Yu, W.; Deng, Y. The SAR Payload Design and Performance for the GF-3 Mission. Sensors 2017, 17, 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102419

AMA Style

Sun J, Yu W, Deng Y. The SAR Payload Design and Performance for the GF-3 Mission. Sensors. 2017; 17(10):2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102419

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Jili, Weidong Yu, and Yunkai Deng. 2017. "The SAR Payload Design and Performance for the GF-3 Mission" Sensors 17, no. 10: 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102419

APA Style

Sun, J., Yu, W., & Deng, Y. (2017). The SAR Payload Design and Performance for the GF-3 Mission. Sensors, 17(10), 2419. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102419

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop