Next Article in Journal
A Teleo-Reactive Node for Implementing Internet of Things Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Development and On-Field Testing of Low-Cost Portable System for Monitoring PM2.5 Concentrations
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 18
Issue 4
10.3390/s18041058
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitive and Selective NH3 Monitoring at Room Temperature Using ZnO Ceramic Nanofibers Decorated with Poly(styrene sulfonate)

by
Rafaela S. Andre
1,2,3,
Dongwook Kwak
4,
Qiuchen Dong
5,
Wei Zhong
6,
Daniel S. Correa
2,3,*,
Luiz H. C. Mattoso
2,3 and
Yu Lei
1,*
1
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Connecticut, 191 Auditorium Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
2
Nanotechnology National Laboratory for Agriculture (LNNA), Embrapa Instrumentação, São Carlos 13560-970, SP, Brazil
3
PPGQ, Department of Chemistry, Center for Exact Sciences and Technology, Federal University of São Carlos (UFSCar), São Carlos 13565-905, SP, Brazil
4
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Connecticut, 97 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
5
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, 260 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
6
Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, 55 North Eagleville Road, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(4), 1058; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041058
Submission received: 13 February 2018 / Revised: 22 March 2018 / Accepted: 30 March 2018 / Published: 1 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ammonia (NH3) gas is a prominent air pollutant that is frequently found in industrial and livestock production environments. Due to the importance in controlling pollution and protecting public health, the development of new platforms for sensing NH3 at room temperature has attracted great attention. In this study, a sensitive NH3 gas device with enhanced selectivity is developed based on zinc oxide nanofibers (ZnO NFs) decorated with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) and operated at room temperature. ZnO NFs were prepared by electrospinning followed by calcination at 500 °C for 3 h. The electrospun ZnO NFs are characterized to evaluate the properties of the as-prepared sensing materials. The loading of PSS to prepare ZnO NFs/PSS composite is also optimized based on the best sensing performance. Under the optimal composition, ZnO NFs/PSS displays rapid, reversible, and sensitive response upon NH3 exposure at room temperature. The device shows a dynamic linear range up to 100 ppm and a limit of detection of 3.22 ppm and enhanced selectivity toward NH3 in synthetic air, against NO2 and CO, compared to pure ZnO NFs. Additionally, a sensing mechanism is proposed to illustrate the sensing performance using ZnO NFs/PSS composite. Therefore, this study provides a simple methodology to design a sensitive platform for NH3 monitoring at room temperature.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ammonia (NH3) is of great commercial interest due to its unique properties for applications as nitrogen source for soil fertilizers, neutralizing agent in the oil industry, gas refrigerant in industrial systems and many uses in pharmaceutical industries [1,2]. However, it is also well documented that ammonia is a toxic gas for human and animals in concentrations above 25 ppm [3,4]. Long-term exposure to NH3 at an unsafe level could cause pulmonary and lung diseases to human and animals besides other health issues [5,6]. Consequently, it is of paramount importance to monitor and control the ammonia levels in closed environments at ambient temperatures, such as in poultry farms [7,8,9,10]. The development of devices capable of operating at ambient temperature is of great interest due to features such as the reduced power consumption, simple operational setup, and longer lifetime of device. Besides, devices operating at ambient temperature present a high potential of portability and integration for smart systems [11,12,13]. Another important remark on the application of such devices, besides poultry farms safety, is the possibility of noninvasive disease diagnoses through gas detection using human breath at ambient temperatures. Therefore, there is a huge demand in the development of novel and reliable gas sensors operating at room temperature for various applications [14,15,16,17,18].
Due to the toxicity of NH3 even at low concentration as aforementioned, the development of gas sensors capable to sensitively and selectively detect low concentrations of NH3 at room temperature [19,20,21,22,23,24] can play an important role in poultry farms, to guarantee safety and nontoxic environment, as well in health care by noninvasive diseases diagnoses. In the past decade, ceramic materials as inorganic oxide semiconductors have been extensively explored as gas sensing materials because of the changes in their electrical characteristic clearly observed upon the exposure to reducing/oxidizing gases [25,26,27,28]. One of the best known semiconductors is n-type ZnO, a material chemically stable with high electron mobility and conductivity, which can be easily obtained through inexpensive methods [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. However, most of ZnO based gas sensors reported in the literature are obtained as thin film and/or operated at elevated temperatures. Still, thin-film based metal oxides as sensing materials saturate quickly and also suffer from the strong diffusion resistance, which typically result in long response/recovery time and low sensitivity [36]. Furthermore, the operation at an elevated temperature requires high-energy consumption. As a good alternative architecture, the sensing materials in nanofibers configuration is more attractive in gas sensor application when compared with thin films because porous nanofiber materials possess both high surface area and good gas accessibility, thus resulting in rapid response and good sensitivity [37,38,39,40]. Moreover, the association of ZnO with different materials for p-n junction fabrication has been reported in the literature in order to overcome some drawbacks, which include: limitation of operation at room temperature (quick saturation), high response time and low stability [41,42,43,44,45]. For example, Wang et al. [22] reported a high performance NH3 sensor based on NiO/ZnO heterostructure. The authors presented the ZnO n-type association with the NiO p-type as a formation of p-n junction. Once ZnO has electron as the majority of the charge carriers it promoted the charge transfer and a reduced potential barrier speeding up the gas adsorption on the material surface. As a consequence, the sensor presented a lower dependence on the temperature and humidity when compared with pure NiO. Another great combination for p-n junction is the use of conjugated polymers with inorganic semiconductors. Pang et al. [46] described the fabrication of a cellulose/TiO2/polyaniline (cellulose/TiO2/PANI) composite with much higher response values to NH3 sensing than cellulose/PANI composite. The presence of TiO2 improved the negative charge carrier concentration, thus resulting in improved charge transfer and the amplified resistance variation.
In this paper, we report a facile method to prepare a NH3 gas sensing composite, composed of ZnO nanofibers (ZnO NFs) decorated with poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS). ZnO NFs were obtained by electrospinning method followed by calcination treatment in order to generate inorganic phase crystallization and remove polymer matrix. Although different polymers, such as poly(3-hexylthiophene) and PANI, have been employed to enhance the NH3 sensing performance, PSS was chosen for coating the ZnO NFs in this study because it is a cost-effective polyelectrolyte capable of promoting an improved adhesion of the sensitive layer onto the substrate [47] and the charge transfer from the sensitive layer to the interdigitated electrode, and also possesses numerous sulfonated groups (SO3−), which favors the ammonia interaction with the sensitive layer. The PSS decoration onto ZnO NFs was carried out by a simple mixing/casting method. Various advanced characterization techniques were carried out to analyze the as-prepared ZnO NFs and the ceramic nanometric fibers morphology. The ZnO NFs coated with an optimized amount of PSS were employed to bridge an interdigitated gold electrode and then investigated for low concentrations of ammonia monitoring at room temperature.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) (PVP, Mw = 1,300,000.00 g mol−1), zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), dimethylformamide (DMF) and poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS, Mw= 200,000 g·mol−1) solution 30 wt % in H2O were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The gas sensing experiments were performed using synthetic dry air, ammonia gas mixture (NH3, 200 ppm in air), nitrogen dioxide (NO2, 1000 ppm in N2) and carbon monoxide (CO, 5% in Argon) obtained from Airgas (Radnor, PA, USA).

2.2. ZnO Nanofibers Fabrication

ZnO NFs were fabricated by electrospinning followed by calcination using a modified procedure reported in our previous works [48,49,50]. Briefly, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and PVP (50:50 wt %) were dissolved in 3 mL DMF. The precursor solution was stirred for 6 h and then transferred to a plastic syringe with a 19-gauge needle for the electrospinning process. Electrospinning parameters were set as 20 kV of the applied voltage, a flow rate of 0.3 mL h−1 and 15 cm of the collecting distance. The collected nanofibers were subjected to a thermal treatment in a muffle furnace at 500 °C for 3 h for the PVP matrix removal and the formation of ZnO NFs.

2.3. Characterization

The structural crystalline phase composition of the as-prepared ZnO nanofibers was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) acquired with an Oxford diffraction XcaliburTM PX Ultra with ONYX detector. The morphology and the size of the electrospun ZnO nanofibers after calcination were observed through scanning electrons microscopy (SEM) using a JEOL 6335F field-emission scanning electron microscope. The nanofiber diameters and their size distribution were estimated using an image analysis software (Image J, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). For further study of the chemical composition and surface characteristics of the obtained ceramic nanofibers, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was carried out with a PHI multiprobe using Mg K (1253.6 eV) as the exciting source.

2.4. Sensor Fabrication and Gas Testing System

To prepare the ZnO NFs functionalized with PSS, ZnO NFs suspension was mixed with PSS aqueous solutions. The final concentration of ZnO NFs was 5 mg mL−1 with the different ratios (by weight percentage) of ZnONFs:PSS at 94:6, 75:25 and 50:50, respectively. A 5 mg mL−1 of ZnO NFs aqueous suspension without PSS was also used to prepare the control sensor for a comparative purpose. The suspensions were sonicated for 30 min and then 2 μL of each ZnO NFs/PSS suspension was drop-cast on a gold interdigitated electrode (IDE). The IDEs were fabricated on silicon wafer by photolithography using a layer of chromium followed by gold layer deposition. The fabricated IDEs possessed 40 fingers, having both finger width and gap between fingers of 3 µm. After solvent evaporation, the NH3 sensors were ready for use.
The sensor devices prepared with different ratios of ZnO NFs and PSS (94:6, 75:25 and 50:50) are referred to as ZnO94/PSS6, ZnO75/PSS25 and ZnO50/PSS50 in the subsequent discussion. In a typical NH3 sensing experiment, the sensor device was placed in a tube chamber and connected to a CHI 660D electrochemical analyzer (CH Instruments Inc., Austin, TX, USA). The current output was optimized and fixed at 5 V DC bias for continuously measurement. A schematic representation of the ceramic nanofiber fabrication deposited onto gold interdigitated electrode (IDE) and the system for NH3 monitoring tests is displayed in Figure 1.

2.5. NH3 Sensing at Room Temperature

The performance of ZnO NFs/PSS based gas sensor at room temperature (25 °C) was evaluated by measuring the resistance change upon exposure to different concentrations of NH3 in a dynamic gas flow system and synthetic air was used as the carrier gas. The gas flow rate was set as 3 L min−1 for the carrying synthetic air and gas mixtures (NH3/synthetic air). Gas flow and target gas concentration in ppm were regulated automatically using a computer-controlled gas mixing system (S-4000, Environics Inc., Tolland, CT, USA). Prior to the measurement, the carrying gas was purged for 40 min in order to obtain a stable baseline. For all the NH3 sensing experiment, the sensor was exposed to NH3 for 4 min followed by synthetic air for 6 min to recover the sensor, and then the procedure was repeated for multiple cycles. The current in the sensor was continuously measured during the gas flow cycles. The electric resistance of the sensor was calculated by applying Ohm’s Law (R = V/I) and the resistance variation observed could be directly related to the ammonia concentration and normalized as ΔR/R0% = [(R0 − Rg)/R0] × 100%, where R0 is the electrical resistance of the sensor in synthetic air and Rg is the measured resistance in NH3.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural and Morphological Characterization of ZnO NFs

Powder X-ray diffractometry (XRD) was employed to confirm the crystal structure of the as-prepared ZnO NFs. Figure 2 shows the XRD pattern of ZnO nanofibers after calcination. One can see that ZnO NFs are crystalline and all diffraction peaks can be assigned to hexagonal wurtzite ZnO phase according to the JCPDS Card No. 36-1451. No diffraction peaks related to secondary phases were found, indicating that all organic and polymeric materials were decomposed during the thermal treatment and thus no impurities or secondary phases are present in the nanofibers.
The nanofibers morphology of the as-prepared ZnO was confirmed using SEM. As shown in Figure 3a, the calcined ZnO product displayed a nanofibrous structure with a mean diameter of 215 nm (Figure 3b). More interestingly, the as-prepared ZnO NFs consisted of numerous interconnected spherical nanoparticles with a mean diameter of 75 nm, as shown in Figure 3c under a higher magnification. Such unique nanoparticle-necklaced nanofiber structure endows the as-prepared ZnO possessing very large surface area and high porosity, which is favorable for subsequent gas sensing.
The composition and chemical bond configuration of the as-prepared ZnO NFs were further studied through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The XPS data was corrected with respect to the standard peak of C 1s at 284.6 eV. The main peaks in XPS survey spectrum of ZnO NFs (data not shown) can be assigned to Zn and O bands and no other peak was observed, indicating high chemical purity of the as-prepared ZnO NFs. Figure 4a presents high resolution spectrum of Zn 2p region with two peaks located at 1042.08 eV and 1019.08 eV (corresponding to Zn 2p1/2 and Zn 2p3/2, respectively), indicating that all Zn ions in the sample are in Zn2+ oxidation state and correspond to a 2p binding energy of Zn(II) ions [51,52]. The 23 eV of distance between these two peaks is in good agreement with the splitting energy reported in the literature for ZnO [51,52]. The high resolution O 1s spectrum also shows its characteristics binding energy. Three distinct oxygen species for O 1s could be well distinguished in Figure 4b. The main peak at 528.95 eV corresponds to the ions in the ZnO crystal lattice (OA) while the peak at 530.98 eV can be related to oxygen vacancies in the crystal lattices (OB). The peak at 532.61 eV can be ascribed to oxygen adsorbed on the ZnO surface mainly in the form of hydroxide (–OH), but also as –CO3, H2O, and O2− species [53,54].

3.2. Gas Sensing Studies

The as-prepared devices (ZnO94/PSS6, ZnO75/PSS25 and ZnO50/PSS50) were tested for ammonia (NH3) sensitivity at room temperature in order to optimize the loading of PSS. A device prepared with pure ZnO nanofibers without PSS (denoted as PZnO) was also tested for NH3 sensitivity for comparison, in order to illustrate the role of PSS. It is worth noting that PSS is non-conducting, thus itself cannot be used to fabricate resistor-type gas sensor. Figure 5 shows the response of different devices with distinct ZnO/PSS ratio upon the exposure to 100 ppm of NH3 at room temperature. One can see that PZnO-based device only possesses very low response to NH3. After the decoration of ZnO NFs with PSS, the sensor response to NH3 increases significantly. Overall, the sensor response to NH3 increases proportionally to the PSS concentration and then gradually levels off. When the percentage of PSS in the composite is over 50%, the sensor displays poor conductivity as well as high background noise (data not shown). To balance the sensing performance and also the conductivity/noise of the device, the ZnO50/PSS50 was then chosen for subsequent NH3 sensing experiments at room temperature.
Figure 6a presents the response-recovery profile of ZnO50/PSS50 to various NH3 gas concentrations (10, 25, 50 and 100 ppm, using air as the carrying gas) as a function of time. One can see that the supply of NH3 gas results in a rapid current increase, in good agreement with a typical n-type semiconductor sensing mechanism. After purging with the carrying air, the signal of the sensing device gradually returns to the baseline level, indicating good recovery capability of the sensor. Figure 6b compares the sensing response of PZnO and ZnO50/PSS50 for different concentrations of NH3. As can be observed, the ZnO50/PSS50 possesses significantly enhanced sensing performance than PZnO across all tested NH3 concentrations. The enhanced performance can be attributed to the presence of PSS on ZnO NFs. Firstly, PSS possesses –SO3− groups, thus the strong interaction between –SO3− groups and basic NH3 can absorb more NH3 to the close contact with ZnO NFs and change the charge state of PSS, enhancing the sensing performance. Secondly, the PSS is a well-known polyelectrolyte with ionic groups that enable/increase the charge mobility. Therefore, the presence of PSS could improve the charge mobility between the ZnO ceramic nanofibers and the target [55], thus enhancing the sensing performance. In addition, the small error bar calculated from three successive cycles of sensing tests indicates the good stability/reproducibility of the sensing composite, as well as its good reversibility for the NH3 adsorption/desorption process.
As shown in Figure 6b, the ZnO50/PSS50 sensor response for different NH3 concentrations showed a dynamic linear range up to 100 ppm (R2 = 0.9807). The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) was calculated as 3.22 ppm based on signal to noise ratio of 3 (S/N = 3). It is worth noting that the response-recovery profile for 10 ppm of NH3 seems to be low in Figure 6a. This is because of the co-display of all response-recovery profiles at different concentrations in one plot with the same scale. For better quantitative representation, Figure 6b confirms the good sensing performance even for 10 ppm of NH3 with a prominent response of 4.61 ± 0.62%, indicating that the developed sensor is well-positioned for the detection of NH3 lower than 25 ppm, the recommended limit for long period of exposure for human and animals [3,4]. Such sensing response at room temperature also indicates that the as-developed NH3 sensing platform possesses an outstanding performance compared with other room-temperature NH3 gas sensors reported in the literature, such as sensors based on pure ceramic nanoparticles [32,56]. To the best of our knowledge, ZnO NFs/PSS composition for ammonia sensing at room temperature has not been reported in the literature before. This study provides insightful information for the development of composite gas sensors based on ceramic nanofibers/polymer suitable for operation at ambient temperature with high performance. Table 1 brings a comparison of the performance of the developed sensor with other NH3 sensing devices reported in the literature for hybrid materials operating at room temperature in terms of response magnitude and response/recovery time.
The selectivity of the ZnO50/PSS50 and PZnO were also investigated and the corresponding results are presented in Figure 7. The sensor devices were tested for 50 ppm of NO2 and CO, which are potential interferents in ammonia sensing in indoor environment at poultry farms [7,60]. According to the absolute value of the normalized sensor response shown in Figure 7, the PZnO device showed poor selectivity against NO2 and CO. The decoration of ZnO NFs with PSS could significantly improve the sensor response to NH3 compared to NO2 and CO, though the interference from NO2 and CO cannot be fully eliminated. Such enhanced selectivity of the developed sensor can be attributed to the improved response to NH3 and the reduced response to NO2 and CO because of the presence of PSS (Figure 7).
The long-term stability is another important analytical characteristic to evaluate the sensor performance, therefore, long-term stability of the ZnO50/PSS50 sensor device was investigated over 40 days. The results showed that the ZnO NFs coated with PSS has reasonably good stability in ambient atmosphere and the sensor still possesses 70% of the original response after 40 days.

3.3. NH3 Sensing Mechanism

The selectivity and sensitivity of semiconductor-based gas sensor is greatly related with the oxide grain size, assuming the grain boundaries acting as scattering centers for the electrons [36,61] as well as the materials surface functionality and temperature. Recognized as an effective material for gas detection at temperatures above 150 °C [62,63,64,65,66], ZnO semiconductor are able to interact with the target gas through several events since the thermic energy coming from heating could reduce the potential barrier, thus enabling the electron flow and so the gas detection [67]. Therefore, the excellent sensitivity and good selectivity of ZnO50/PSS50 at room temperature can be attributed to the high surface area and grain boundary interconnections observed for ZnO nanofibers and presented in Figure 3a. The high surface area and grain boundary interconnections indicate more abundant scattering centers. In conjunction with the charge mobility improvement through the sensitive layer/substrate promoted by the polyelectrolyte PSS, ZnO NFs/PSS offers us a sensing material with unique properties for gas sensors application. As confirmed by XPS characterization, the ZnO nanofiber surface presents O2− adsorbed species. After coating with PSS, a heterojunction is formed at the ZnO-PSS interface. Therefore, the enhanced sensing performance can be rationalized by the effects of the PSS presence in multiple steps: the electron carrier in ZnO NFs is depleted by the proton-donating PSS at the interface, which, in turn, induces a smaller carrier base and thus an amplified sensing response [68]. In addition, the NH3 adsorption can be proposed by a mechanism of interaction with the SO3− groups from PSS, which increases the charge carrier concentration decreasing the resistivity [55,69,70]. Moreover, an electrostatic potential gradient, or local electrostatic field, is established at the depletion layer, which favors the charge transport [68]. This likely accelerates the adsorption of the polar gases (e.g., NH3). As both adsorption of analyte species and electron transition between the analyte and sensing materials have been enhanced, the formation of PSS-ZnO heterojunction is favorable for the electronic gas sensing. Consequently, the obtained ZnO50/PSS50 based sensor could detect low concentration NH3 sensitively at room temperature.

4. Conclusions

A simple and sensitive resistor-type NH3 gas sensor based on a novel ZnO NFs/PSS composite was successfully developed and operated at room temperature. ZnO NFs were prepared by electrospinning followed by calcination. PSS polyelectrolyte was employed to decorate ZnO NFs to improve its adhesion to the IDE electrodes and also serve as a dopant to form heterojunction at the interface between ZnO NFs and PSS, thus resulting in an enhanced sensing performance. Upon exposure to NH3 gas, both rapid response and fast recovery can be achieved with an dynamic range up to 100 ppm and LOD of 3.22 ppm (S/N = 3). The presence of PSS also significantly improves the selectivity against NO2 and CO, compared to the device fabricated only using ZnO NFs. This work demonstrates that PSS is suitable for the tuning of the electronic structures of ZnO NFs, thus offering a facile way to develop room-temperature gas sensor with high performance.

Acknowledgments

R.S.A., D.S.C. and L.H.C.M. thank the financial support from CAPES (99999.006608/2015-09), CNPq and MCTI/SISNano. D.W.K. and Y.L. also thank the partial financial support from DOE.

Author Contributions

R.S.A. performed the experiments and wrote the paper; D.W.K. and Q.C.D. contributed both with the experiments and electronic microscopy analyses; W.Z. performed the XPS and contributed with the data analyses; Y.L., L.H.C.M. and D.S.C. conceived and designed the experiments and also participated in revising the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Timmer, B.; Olthuis, W.; Berg, A. Van Den Ammonia sensors and their applications—A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2005, 107, 666–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wang, Q.; Dong, X.; Pang, Z.; Du, Y.; Xia, X.; Wei, Q.; Huang, F. Ammonia Sensing Behaviors of TiO2-PANI/PA6 Composite Nanofibers. Sensors 2012, 12, 17046–17057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Griffiths, R.F.; Megson, L.C. The effect of uncertainties in human toxic response on hazard range estimation for ammonia and chlorine. Atmos. Environ. 1984, 18, 1195–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Corkery, G.; Ward, S.; CKenny, C.; Hemmingway, P. Title Monitoring environmental parameters in poultry production facilities Author(s). In Computer Aided Process Engineering, CAPE Forum 2013; Graz University of Technology: Graz, Austria, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mani, G.K.; Rayappan, J.B.B. A highly selective and wide range ammonia sensor—Nanostructured ZnO:Co thin film. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2015, 191, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ghosh, R.; Nayak, A.K.; Santra, S.; Pradhan, D.; Guha, P.K. Enhanced ammonia sensing at room temperature with reduced graphene oxide/tin oxide hybrid films. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 50165–50173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bittman, S.; Jones, K.; Vingarzan, R.; Hunt, D.E.; Sheppard, S.C.; Tait, J.; So, R.; Zhao, J. Weekly agricultural emissions and ambient concentrations of ammonia: Validation of an emission inventory. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 113, 108–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ji, B.; Gates, R.S.; Zheng, W.; Grift, T.E.; Green, A.R.; Koelkebeck, K.W. Design and Performance Evaluation of Upgraded Portable Monitoring Units for Barn Air Quality. ASABE Annu. Int. Meet. 2015, 1, 774–787. [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhao, Y.; Shepherd, T.A.; Li, H.; Xin, H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part I: Monitoring system and indoor air quality. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 518–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ta, S.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Stinn, S.; Xin, H.; Shepherd, T.A.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Stinn, J.P.; Hayes, M.D.; Xin, H. Environmental assessment of three egg production systems—Part II. Ammonia, greenhouse gas, and particulate matter emissions. Poult. Sci. 2015, 94, 534–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thungon, P.D.; Kakoti, A.; Ngashangva, L.; Goswami, P. Advances in developing rapid, reliable and portable detection systems for alcohol. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 97, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Timsorn, K.; Lorjaroenphon, Y.; Wongchoosuk, C. Identification of adulteration in uncooked Jasmine rice by a portable low-cost artificial olfactory system. Measurement 2017, 108, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Järvinen, T.; Lorite, G.S.; Rautio, A.-R.; Juhász, K.L.; Kukovecz, Á.; Kónya, Z.; Kordas, K.; Toth, G. Portable cyber-physical system for indoor and outdoor gas sensing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 252, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hyodo, T.; Urata, K.; Kamada, K.; Ueda, T.; Shimizu, Y. Semiconductor-type SnO2-based NO2 sensors operated at room temperature under UV-light irradiation. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 630–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, Z.; Peng, X.; Huang, C.; Chen, X.; Dai, W.; Fu, X. CO gas sensitivity and its oxidation over TiO2 modified by PANI under UV irradiation at room temperature. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 219, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, Z.; Yu, L.; Guo, F.; Liu, S.; Qi, L.; Shan, M.; Fan, X. Facial development of high performance room temperature NO2 gas sensors based on ZnO nanowalls decorated rGO nanosheets. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 423, 721–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Abu-Hani, A.F.S.; Greish, Y.E.; Mahmoud, S.T.; Awwad, F.; Ayesh, A.I. Low-temperature and fast response H2S gas sensor using semiconducting chitosan film. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhuang, Z.; Qi, D.; Ru, C.; Pan, J.; Zhao, C.; Na, H. Fast response and highly sensitive humidity sensors based on CaCl2-doped sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone)s. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 666–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Piloto, C.; Mirri, F.; Bengio, E.A.; Notarianni, M.; Gupta, B.; Shafiei, M.; Pasquali, M.; Motta, N. Room temperature gas sensing properties of ultrathin carbon nanotube films by surfactant-free dip coating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 227, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andre, R.S.; Chen, J.; Kwak, D.; Correa, D.S.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Lei, Y. A flexible and disposable poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate)/polyaniline coated glass microfiber paper for sensitive and selective detection of ammonia at room temperature. Synth. Met. 2017, 233, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Su, P.-G.; Yang, L.-Y. NH3 gas sensor based on Pd/SnO2/RGO ternary composite operated at room-temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 223, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Yang, P.; Wei, X. High-Performance, Room-Temperature, and No-Humidity-Impact Ammonia Sensor Based on Heterogeneous Nickel Oxide and Zinc Oxide Nanocrystals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 3816–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Andre, R.S.; Shimizu, F.M.; Miyazaki, C.M.; Riul, A.; Manzani, D.; Ribeiro, S.J.L.; Oliveira, O.N.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Correa, D.S. Hybrid layer-by-layer (LbL) films of polyaniline, graphene oxide and zinc oxide to detect ammonia. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 238, 795–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shafiei, M.; Hoshyargar, F.; Lipton-Duffin, J.; Piloto, C.; Motta, N.; OMullane, A.P. Conversion of n-Type CuTCNQ into p-Type Nitrogen-Doped CuO and the Implication for Room-Temperature Gas Sensing. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 22208–22216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Sun, P.; Cai, Y.; Du, S.; Xu, X.; You, L.; Ma, J.; Liu, F.; Liang, X.; Sun, Y.; Lu, G. Hierarchical α-Fe2O3/SnO2 semiconductor composites: Hydrothermal synthesis and gas sensing properties. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 182, 336–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Masson, N.; Piedrahita, R.; Hannigan, M. Approach for quantification of metal oxide type semiconductor gas sensors used for ambient air quality monitoring. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 208, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Feng, Q.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Gaskov, A.M. Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) encapsulated Co3O4 composite nanofibers for highly selective ammonia sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 222, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, X.; Cheng, S.; Liu, H.; Hu, S.; Zhang, D.; Ning, H. A Survey on Gas Sensing Technology. Sensors 2012, 12, 9635–9665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Park, S.; An, S.; Ko, H.; Jin, C.; Lee, C. Synthesis of nanograined ZnO nanowires and their enhanced gas sensing properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 3650–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Deng, J.; Fu, Q.; Luo, W.; Tong, X.; Xiong, J.; Hu, Y.; Zheng, Z. Enhanced H2S gas sensing properties of undoped ZnO nanocrystalline films from QDs by low-temperature processing. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 224, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiu, Y.; Yang, M.; Fan, H.; Xu, Y.; Shao, Y.; Yang, X.; Yang, S. Synthesis of ZnO nanorod arrays on Zn substrates by a gas–solution–solid method and their application as an ammonia sensor. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ponnusamy, D.; Madanagurusamy, S. Nanostructured ZnO Films for Room Temperature Ammonia Sensing. J. Electron. Mater. 2014, 43, 3211–3216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Li, C.-F.; Hsu, C.-Y.; Li, Y.-Y. NH3 sensing properties of ZnO thin films prepared via sol-gel method. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 606, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Guo, W.; Liu, T.; Zeng, W.; Liu, D.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z. Gas-sensing property improvement of ZnO by hierarchical flower-like architectures. Mater. Lett. 2011, 65, 3384–3387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, A.; Pan, L.; Huang, W. Recent progress in the ZnO nanostructure-based sensors. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2011, 176, 1409–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arshak, K.; Moore, E.; Lyons, G.M.; Harris, J.; Clifford, S. A review of gas sensors employed in electronic nose applications. Sens. Rev. 2004, 24, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mercante, L.A.; Scagion, V.P.; Migliorini, F.L.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Correa, D.S. Electrospinning-based (bio)sensors for food and agricultural applications: A review. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 91, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pascariu, P.; Airinei, A.; Olaru, N.; Petrila, I.; Nica, V.; Sacarescu, L.; Tudorache, F. Microstructure, electrical and humidity sensor properties of electrospun NiO-SnO2 nanofibers. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 222, 1024–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yang, X.; Salles, V.; Kaneti, Y.V.; Liu, M.; Maillard, M.; Journet, C.; Jiang, X.; Brioude, A. Fabrication of highly sensitive gas sensor based on Au functionalized WO3 composite nanofibers by electrospinning. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 220, 1112–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wu, H.; Pan, W.; Lin, D.; Li, H. Electrospinning of ceramic nanofibers: Fabrication, assembly and applications. J. Adv. Ceram. 2012, 1, 2–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piloto, C.; Shafiei, M.; Khan, H.; Gupta, B.; Tesfamichael, T.; Motta, N. Sensing performance of reduced graphene oxide-Fe doped WO3 hybrids to NO2 and humidity at room temperature. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 434, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, W.; Wu, X.; Chen, J.; Gong, Y.; Han, N.; Chen, Y. Abnormal n-p-n type conductivity transition of hollow ZnO/ZnFe2O4 nanostructures during gas sensing process: The role of ZnO-ZnFe2O4 hetero-interface. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Song, X.-Z.; Qiao, L.; Sun, K.-M.; Tan, Z.; Ma, W.; Kang, X.-L.; Sun, F.-F.; Huang, T.; Wang, X.-F. Triple-shelled ZnO/ZnFe2O4 heterojunctional hollow microspheres derived from Prussian Blue analogue as high-performance acetone sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 374–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, Y.; Luo, N.; Sun, G.; Zhang, B.; Ma, G.; Jin, H.; Wang, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Z. Facile synthesis of ZnO/ZnFe2O4/α-Fe2O3 porous microrods with enhanced TEA-sensing performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 737, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Poloju, M.; Jayababu, N.; Ramana Reddy, M.V. Improved gas sensing performance of Al doped ZnO/CuO nanocomposite based ammonia gas sensor. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 227, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pang, Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Q.; Huang, F.; Wei, Q. A room temperature ammonia gas sensor based on cellulose/TiO2/PANI composite nanofibers. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2016, 494, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lin, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, L.; Zhang, J.; Shen, L.; Chen, Q.; Shi, W. Fully gravure-printed NO2 gas sensor on a polyimide foil using WO3-PEDOT:PSS nanocomposites and Ag electrodes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 216, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, L.; Gao, P.-X.; Lei, Y. CeO2 nanofibers for in situ O2 and CO sensing in harsh environments. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 5193–5198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Liu, Y.; Sun, X.; Zhou, Z.; Lei, Y. Electrospun Ce-Ni-O composite nanofibers for highly selective propane detection at high temperature based on its rapid reaction kinetics. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 14038–14047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, Y.; Ding, Y.; La, A.; Lei, Y. Preparation, characterization and gas sensing application of novel conducting polypyrrole composite nanofibers. In Polypyrrole: Properties, Performance and Applications; Mason, E.C., Weber, A.P., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2011; p. 17. ISBN 978-1-61209-143-3. [Google Scholar]
  51. Rahman, M.M.; Khan, S.B.; Marwani, H.M.; Asiri, A.M.; Alamry, K.A.; Rub, M.A.; Khan, A.; Khan, A.A.P.; Azum, N. Facile synthesis of doped ZnO-CdO nanoblocks as solid-phase adsorbent and efficient solar photo-catalyst applications. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2014, 20, 2278–2286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cai, X.; Hu, D.; Deng, S.; Han, B.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J. Isopropanol sensing properties of coral-like ZnO-CdO composites by flash preparation via self-sustained decomposition of metal-organic complexes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 198, 402–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Park, S.Y.; Kim, S.; Yoo, J.; Lim, K.-H.; Lee, E.; Kim, K.; Kim, J.; Kim, Y.S. Aqueous zinc ammine complex for solution-processed ZnO semiconductors in thin film transistors. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 11295–11299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hsieh, P.-T.; Chen, Y.-C.; Kao, K.-S.; Wang, C.-M. Luminescence mechanism of ZnO thin film investigated by XPS measurement. Appl. Phys. A 2007, 90, 317–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Seekaew, Y.; Lokavee, S.; Phokharatkul, D.; Wisitsoraat, A.; Kerdcharoen, T.; Wongchoosuk, C. Low-cost and flexible printed graphene-PEDOT:PSS gas sensor for ammonia detection. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 2971–2981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Xu, S.; Kan, K.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, C.; Gao, J.; Jing, L.; Shen, P.; Li, L.; Shi, K. Enhanced NH3 gas sensing performance based on electrospun alkaline-earth metals composited SnO2 nanofibers. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 618, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bai, S.; Tian, Y.; Cui, M.; Sun, J.; Tian, Y.; Luo, R.; Chen, A.; Li, D. Polyaniline@SnO2 heterojunction loading on flexible PET thin film for detection of NH3 at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 226, 540–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Sundara Venkatesh, P.; Dharmaraj, P.; Purushothaman, V.; Ramakrishnan, V.; Jeganathan, K. Point defects assisted NH3 gas sensing properties in ZnO nanostructures. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 212, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lin, Q.; Li, Y.; Yang, M. Tin oxide/graphene composite fabricated via a hydrothermal method for gas sensors working at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 173, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Loyon, L.; Burton, C.H.; Misselbrook, T.; Webb, J.; Philippe, F.X.; Aguilar, M.; Doreau, M.; Hassouna, M.; Veldkamp, T.; Dourmad, J.Y.; et al. Best available technology for European livestock farms: Availability, effectiveness and uptake. J. Environ. Manag. 2016, 166, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Lou, Z.; Deng, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, R.; Fei, T.; Zhang, T. A class of hierarchical nanostructures: ZnO surface-functionalized TiO2 with enhanced sensing properties. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 3131–3136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, T.; Kou, X.; Zhao, L.; Sun, P.; Liu, C.; Wang, Y.; Shimanoe, K.; Yamazoe, N.; Lu, G. Flower-like ZnO hollow microspheres loaded with CdO nanoparticles as high performance sensing material for gas sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 250, 692–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lim, Y.T.; Son, J.Y.; Rhee, J.-S. Vertical ZnO nanorod array as an effective hydrogen gas sensor. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 887–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Rai, P.; Khan, R.; Ahmad, R.; Hahn, Y.-B.; Lee, I.-H.; Yu, Y.-T. Gas sensing properties of single crystalline ZnO nanowires grown by thermal evaporation technique. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2013, 13, 1769–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gurav, K.V.; Patil, U.M.; Shin, S.W.; Pawar, S.M.; Kim, J.H.; Lokhande, C.D. Morphology evolution of ZnO thin films from aqueous solutions and their application to liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) sensor. J. Alloys Compd. 2012, 525, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Navaneethan, M.; Patil, V.L.; Ponnusamy, S.; Muthamizhchelvan, C.; Kawasaki, S.; Patil, P.S.; Hayakawa, Y. Sensitivity enhancement of ammonia gas sensor based on Ag/ZnO flower and nanoellipsoids at low temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 255, 672–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Patil, N.B.; Nimbalkar, A.R.; Patil, M.G. ZnO thin film prepared by a sol-gel spin coating technique for NO2 detection. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 227, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, Y.; Akhigbe, J.; Ding, Y.; Brückner, C.; Lei, Y. meso-Tritolylcorrole-Functionalized Single-walled Carbon Nanotube Donor Acceptor Nanocomposites for NO2 Detection. Electroanalysis 2012, 24, 1348–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ganbavle, V.V.; Inamdar, S.I.; Agawane, G.L.; Kim, J.H.; Rajpure, K.Y. Synthesis of fast response, highly sensitive and selective Ni:ZnO based NO2 sensor. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 286, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wang, Y.; Jia, W.; Strout, T.; Ding, Y.; Lei, Y. Preparation, Characterization and Sensitive Gas Sensing of Conductive Core-sheath TiO2-PEDOT Nanocables. Sensors 2009, 9, 6752–6763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sensors 18 01058 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the ceramic nanofibers (CNF) fabrication deposited onto gold interdigitated electrode (IDE) and the system for NH3 monitoring tests.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the ceramic nanofibers (CNF) fabrication deposited onto gold interdigitated electrode (IDE) and the system for NH3 monitoring tests.
Sensors 18 01058 g001
Sensors 18 01058 g002 550
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction pattern of the as-prepared ZnO nanofibers.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction pattern of the as-prepared ZnO nanofibers.
Sensors 18 01058 g002
Sensors 18 01058 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy picture of ZnO nanofibers; (b) a Histogram of diameter size distribution; (c) ZnO nanofibers at higher magnification.
Figure 3. (a) Scanning electron microscopy picture of ZnO nanofibers; (b) a Histogram of diameter size distribution; (c) ZnO nanofibers at higher magnification.
Sensors 18 01058 g003
Sensors 18 01058 g004 550
Figure 4. The high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of ZnO NFs (a) in the Zn 2p region and (b) the O 1s region.
Figure 4. The high-resolution X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of ZnO NFs (a) in the Zn 2p region and (b) the O 1s region.
Sensors 18 01058 g004
Sensors 18 01058 g005 550
Figure 5. The normalized sensing response of different devices exposed to 100 ppm of NH3 as a function of poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) concentration in: pure ZnO NFs (0% of PSS), ZnO94/PSS6 (6% of PSS), ZnO75/PSS25 (25% of PSS) and ZnO50/PSS50 (50% of PSS) devices.
Figure 5. The normalized sensing response of different devices exposed to 100 ppm of NH3 as a function of poly(styrene sulfonate) (PSS) concentration in: pure ZnO NFs (0% of PSS), ZnO94/PSS6 (6% of PSS), ZnO75/PSS25 (25% of PSS) and ZnO50/PSS50 (50% of PSS) devices.
Sensors 18 01058 g005
Sensors 18 01058 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Response-recovery profile of ZnO50/PSS50 device as a function of time for NH3 concentration varying from 10 to 100 ppm, and (b) sensing response as a function of NH3 concentration for ZnO50/PSS50 and PZnO devices, respectively.
Figure 6. (a) Response-recovery profile of ZnO50/PSS50 device as a function of time for NH3 concentration varying from 10 to 100 ppm, and (b) sensing response as a function of NH3 concentration for ZnO50/PSS50 and PZnO devices, respectively.
Sensors 18 01058 g006
Sensors 18 01058 g007 550
Figure 7. Selectivity study of ZnO50/PSS50 and PZnO devices upon exposure to 50 ppm of NO2, NH3 and CO, respectively.
Figure 7. Selectivity study of ZnO50/PSS50 and PZnO devices upon exposure to 50 ppm of NO2, NH3 and CO, respectively.
Sensors 18 01058 g007
Table
Table 1. NH3 sensing properties of reported sensors based on hybrid materials.
Table 1. NH3 sensing properties of reported sensors based on hybrid materials.
MaterialResponse (ΔR/Rg)Response Time (s)Recovery Time (s)NH3 ConcentrationReference
ZnO/PSS nanofibers17%51160100 ppm This work
Polyaniline (PANI)/SnO2-33-100 ppm [57]
ZnO10%4919100 ppm[58]
Cellulose/TiO2/PANI nanofibers3.583130100 ppm[46]
rGO/AgNWs *15%60150100 ppm[59]
rGO/Co3O4 nanofibers53.6%430050 ppm[27]
* rGO/AgNWs: reduced graphene oxide with silver nanowires.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Andre, R.S.; Kwak, D.; Dong, Q.; Zhong, W.; Correa, D.S.; Mattoso, L.H.C.; Lei, Y. Sensitive and Selective NH3 Monitoring at Room Temperature Using ZnO Ceramic Nanofibers Decorated with Poly(styrene sulfonate). Sensors 2018, 18, 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041058

AMA Style

Andre RS, Kwak D, Dong Q, Zhong W, Correa DS, Mattoso LHC, Lei Y. Sensitive and Selective NH3 Monitoring at Room Temperature Using ZnO Ceramic Nanofibers Decorated with Poly(styrene sulfonate). Sensors. 2018; 18(4):1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041058

Chicago/Turabian Style

Andre, Rafaela S., Dongwook Kwak, Qiuchen Dong, Wei Zhong, Daniel S. Correa, Luiz H. C. Mattoso, and Yu Lei. 2018. "Sensitive and Selective NH3 Monitoring at Room Temperature Using ZnO Ceramic Nanofibers Decorated with Poly(styrene sulfonate)" Sensors 18, no. 4: 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041058

APA Style

Andre, R. S., Kwak, D., Dong, Q., Zhong, W., Correa, D. S., Mattoso, L. H. C., & Lei, Y. (2018). Sensitive and Selective NH3 Monitoring at Room Temperature Using ZnO Ceramic Nanofibers Decorated with Poly(styrene sulfonate). Sensors, 18(4), 1058. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18041058

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop