Next Article in Journal
Design and Vibration Suppression Control of a Modular Elastic Joint
Next Article in Special Issue
An Improved Electronic Image Motion Compensation (IMC) Method of Aerial Full-Frame-Type Area Array CCD Camera Based on the CCD Multiphase Structure and Hardware Implementation
Previous Article in Journal
A Low-Noise Direct Incremental A/D Converter for FET-Based THz Imaging Detectors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experiments and Analysis of Close-Shot Identification of On-Branch Citrus Fruit with RealSense
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Optical Tracking Data Validation and Orbit Estimation for Sparse Observations of Satellites by the OWL-Net

1
Center for Space Situational Awareness, Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 776, Daedeokdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34055, Korea
2
Astronomy and Space Science Department, University of Science and Technology, 217, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34113, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2018, 18(6), 1868; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061868
Submission received: 1 May 2018 / Revised: 5 June 2018 / Accepted: 5 June 2018 / Published: 7 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Charge-Coupled Device (CCD) Sensors)

Abstract

An Optical Wide-field patroL-Network (OWL-Net) has been developed for maintaining Korean low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites’ orbital ephemeris. The OWL-Net consists of five optical tracking stations. Brightness signals of reflected sunlight of the targets were detected by a charged coupled device (CCD). A chopper system was adopted for fast astrometric data sampling, maximum 50 Hz, within a short observation time. The astrometric accuracy of the optical observation data was validated with precise orbital ephemeris such as Consolidated Prediction File (CPF) data and precise orbit determination result with onboard Global Positioning System (GPS) data from the target satellite. In the optical observation simulation of the OWL-Net for 2017, an average observation span for a single arc of 11 LEO observation targets was about 5 min, while an average optical observation separation time was 5 h. We estimated the position and velocity with an atmospheric drag coefficient of LEO observation targets using a sequential-batch orbit estimation technique after multi-arc batch orbit estimation. Post-fit residuals for the multi-arc batch orbit estimation and sequential-batch orbit estimation were analyzed for the optical measurements and reference orbit (CPF and GPS data). The post-fit residuals with reference show few tens-of-meters errors for in-track direction for multi-arc batch and sequential-batch orbit estimation results.
Keywords: CCD; optical telescope; OWL-Net; short-arc; sparse data; orbit estimation CCD; optical telescope; OWL-Net; short-arc; sparse data; orbit estimation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Choi, J.; Jo, J.H.; Yim, H.-S.; Choi, E.-J.; Cho, S.; Park, J.-H. Optical Tracking Data Validation and Orbit Estimation for Sparse Observations of Satellites by the OWL-Net. Sensors 2018, 18, 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061868

AMA Style

Choi J, Jo JH, Yim H-S, Choi E-J, Cho S, Park J-H. Optical Tracking Data Validation and Orbit Estimation for Sparse Observations of Satellites by the OWL-Net. Sensors. 2018; 18(6):1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061868

Chicago/Turabian Style

Choi, Jin, Jung Hyun Jo, Hong-Suh Yim, Eun-Jung Choi, Sungki Cho, and Jang-Hyun Park. 2018. "Optical Tracking Data Validation and Orbit Estimation for Sparse Observations of Satellites by the OWL-Net" Sensors 18, no. 6: 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061868

APA Style

Choi, J., Jo, J. H., Yim, H.-S., Choi, E.-J., Cho, S., & Park, J.-H. (2018). Optical Tracking Data Validation and Orbit Estimation for Sparse Observations of Satellites by the OWL-Net. Sensors, 18(6), 1868. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18061868

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop