Next Article in Journal
A Fast, Three-Dimensional, Indirect Geolocation Method Using IAGM and DSM Data without GCPs for Spaceborne SAR Images
Previous Article in Journal
Video Smoke Detection Method Based on Change-Cumulative Image and Fusion Deep Network
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 19
Issue 23
10.3390/s19235061
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Response of UV/Blue Light and Ozone Sensing Using Ag-TiO2 Planar Nanocomposite Thin Film

by
Tzu-Hsuan Lo
1,
Pen-Yuan Shih
1 and
Chiu-Hsien Wu
1,2,*
1
Department of Physics, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
2
Institute of Nanoscience, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 402, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(23), 5061; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235061
Submission received: 14 October 2019 / Revised: 10 November 2019 / Accepted: 18 November 2019 / Published: 20 November 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
We successfully fabricated a planar nanocomposite film that uses a composite of silver nanoparticles and titanium dioxide film (Ag-TiO2) for ultraviolet (UV) and blue light detection and application in ozone gas sensor. Ultraviolet-visible spectra revealed that silver nanoparticles have a strong surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect. A strong redshift of the plasmonic peak when the silver nanoparticles covered the TiO2 thin film was observed. The value of conductivity change for the Ag-TiO2 composite is 4–8 times greater than that of TiO2 film under UV and blue light irradiation. The Ag-TiO2 nanocomposite film successfully sensed 100 ppb ozone. The gas response of the composite film increased by roughly six and four times under UV and blue light irradiation, respectively. We demonstrated that a Ag-TiO2 composite gas sensor can be used with visible light (blue). The planar composite significantly enhances photo catalysis. The composite films have practical application potential for wearable devices.

1. Introduction

Due to growing environmental awareness, photocatalysts have been identified as green materials for reducing air pollution [1]. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a popular photocatalytic material with considerable development potential [2,3]. With a bandgap of about 3.2 eV at an absorption wavelength of around 360 nm, TiO2 is a widely-studied n-type metal-oxide semiconductor (MOS) that is commonly used in photocatalysts and gas sensors [4,5,6]. Enhancing light response is an important application of the light-harvesting and gas sensing capabilities of TiO2. According to researchers, doping noble-metal particles can enhance the photocatalytic and degradation efficiency of TiO2 for chemical or biological matter. Absorption spectra also show good response in visible light when TiO2 nanocomposites (metal-doped TiO2) are used [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Several methods, such as metal particle doping, polymer nanocomposites, and core-shell nanoparticles [13,14,15,16], have been developed to enhance photocatalysis. The primary reason for this enhancement is that the surface plasmon resonance (SPR) produced by these metal nanoparticles can significantly change the visible light response and electrical properties of semiconductors. Via the SPR effect, the metal-nanoparticle composite provides additional electrons to the semiconductor. Different metal nanoparticles (Ag, Au) doped on MOSs are widely used in many fields to generate SPR and enhance photocatalysis; they are also used in gas sensors, environmental protection technologies, solar cells, energy storage devices, and photoelectric materials [17,18,19]. For example, researchers have applied SPR with magnetic microspheres for prion protein detection [20,21,22], a magnetic biochip (Au/Fe2O3/Au) for antigen detection [23], core-shell γ-Fe2O3@Au nanoparticles for low-field nuclear magnetic resonance [24], a gold film-coated side-polished fiber for temperature sensor fabrication [25], and Au@SiO2 core-shell NPs into TiO2 scaffold layer to increase the power conversion efficiency of solar cells [26].
With their excellent characteristics, MOSs doped with metal nanoparticles are highly desirable composite materials. In this study, we discuss the Ag-TiO2 planar composite film [17]. The methods used in the complexation of metal nanoparticles in TiO2 are primarily chemical-based. However, it is difficult to ensure the uniform doping of silver nanoparticles in TiO2 for large-scale and mass production [18,19,27,28,29]. We coated silver nanoparticles with TiO2 by electron-beam (e-beam) evaporation during the semiconductor fabrication process to ensure that the silver nanoparticles were in complete contact with the TiO2, without the use of high-temperature annealing, while still successfully sensing 100 ppb ozone [17]. This approach can significantly improve the practical application of silver particles in areas such as the manufacturing of gas sensors and wearable devices. We discuss the electrical properties, light response, conductivity change, and gas sensing of the Ag-TiO2 composite film for the detection of light and gas molecules.

2. Materials and Methods

We prepared the silver nanoparticles on a non-conductive glass and performed radio-frequency (RF)-magnetron sputtering at room temperature to deposit a silver film 10 nm thick. This film was then annealed at 250 °C for 1 h to produce nanoparticles. TiO2 film was overlaid with silver nanoparticles. Using a Ti3O5 tablet as a starting material, we then performed e-beam evaporation at a working pressure of approximately 0.1 Torr to produce TiO2 films with thicknesses of 10 nm, 20 nm, 30 nm, and 40 nm. The reaction equation is as follows [30,31]:
2 T i 3 O 5 + O 2 → 6 T i O 2
We labeled the Ag-TiO2 films with thicknesses of 10 nm and 20 nm as AT10 and AT20, respectively. We labeled the TiO2 films with thicknesses of 10 nm and 20 nm as T10 and T20, respectively. Using RF-magnetron sputtering, we deposited a gold film with a thickness of 100 nm on the sample as a measuring electrode. We used a multimeter (Keithley 2400) to measure the electrical properties. We determined the particle sizes, morphologies, and lattice structures of the silver nanoparticles by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray spectroscopy, and measured the absorption spectra with a UV-Vis spectrometer.
In the experiments conducted to determine the light response and ozone detection, we used ultraviolet (UV) light and blue light-emitting diode as light sources. These measurements are described in detail elsewhere [32,33,34].

3. Results

3.1. Chacteristics of Ag-TiO2

Figure 1 shows SEM images of the Ag nanoparticles and Ag-TiO2 film [35]. In Figure 1a, we can see that the Ag nanoparticles are almost spherical in shape. The silver nanoparticles have a uniform distribution with ring-like aggregates. There are four main nanoparticle groups with diameters of 5 nm, 15 nm, 25 nm, and 35 nm, respectively, and a maximum size of about 70 nm, as shown in the inset of Figure 1a. The average size is about 28 ± 13.26 nm. There are few particles whose sizes are over 80 nm. Figure 1b shows the Ag nanoparticles covering the TiO2 film; grains can be clearly observed on this Ag-TiO2 composition film, with average sizes ranging from 50 nm to 80 nm. This indicates that the particle sizes increased after the deposition of the 20 nm thick TiO2 film on the Ag nanoparticles. The image of the Ag-TiO2 composite film also shows an uneven surface.
Figure 2 shows the X-ray diffraction pattern of the Ag-TiO2 composite, in which we can see no distinct peak for the TiO2 film. The small peak at 2θ = 38.08 can be indexed as (111) for the silver nanoparticles. TiO2 films, without having undergone an annealing process by e-beam evaporation, are amorphous [3].
Figure 3a shows the transmittance and absorption spectra of the samples (Ag, T10, AT10, AT20, AT30, and AT40), as measured by a UV-Vis spectrometer. The absorption spectrum of the silver nanoparticles alone (without TiO2 film) exhibits a clear and sharp peak at 429 nm, indicating silver spherical nanoparticles with the average sizes ranging from 30 to 50 nm [36,37]. This absorption spectrum indicates a localized SPR (LSPR) [38]. We can also see an unapparent peak at 360 nm in the absorption curve. The two resonance peaks in the UV-Vis spectra of the silver nanoparticles are mainly attributable to the dipole and multipole models (quadrupole) [39,40,41]. Multipole resonance is produced by a nonuniform electric field in the short-wavelength region, and it has been identified as hybrid quadrupole resonance. The main reason for the nonuniform polarization and electric fields is the nonlocal homogenized medium of the overlaid TiO2 film or the nanoparticle distribution [42].
The optical transmission spectra of T10 show that all of the TiO2 films were highly transparent, i.e., more than 80%, in the visible region. Both the pure T10 and AT10 nanocomposites exhibit transmission edges at about 350 nm. The transmission spectra of AT10 and AT20 reveal a redshift due to the influence of the added silver nanoparticles. The spectra of AT10, AT20, AT30, and AT40 exhibit transmission edges at ~330 nm and a broad wave around 500 nm [17,19,20,29,30]. The transmission spectra of the semiconductor and metal nanoparticles overlap, which indicates that the TiO2 and Ag metal nanoparticles were simultaneously excited by the light. There was also an edge at around 330 nm of the TiO2 film and a peak at 500 nm due to the SPR of isolated silver nanoparticles in the samples. We found the resonance peak of the silver nanoparticles to be significantly affected by the TiO2 film covering. The plasmon resonance of the silver nanoparticles was redshifted from a wavelength of 428 nm to 500 nm with TiO2 films of 10–30 nm. As the thickness of the TiO2 film increased to 40 nm, the redshift to 540 nm became more evident. The shift in the plasmon on this nanocomposite may be primarily attributable to the change in the permittivity of the medium. After coating, the oxide film has a much higher permittivity (εm). This variety of plasmonic peak can be briefly explained by the Drude model [43]:
W L S P R ≈ W P 1 + 2 ε m
where WLSPR is the frequency of the LSPR, Wp is the plasma frequency of the bulky metal, and εm is the dielectric constant of the medium. However, the shift values of the experimental data and those calculated by the Drude model are slightly different. This difference may be due to the size, shape, and distribution of the silver nanoparticles.
The UV-Vis transmission spectra of the Ag-TiO2 composites also reveal the transmittance to be less than 20%, which indicates that the composite films have a significant absorbance at the ~500-nm wavelength (blue light). The transmittance at wavelengths ranging from 300 to 600 nm is also less than 80%. This can be attributed to the fact that silver nanoparticles scatter the unabsorbed photons under light irradiation, resulting in an increase in the average photon path length, which increases the absorption [44]
Both the absorption peak of TiO2 and the Ag resonance showed a redshift, which indicates a reduction in the optical bandgap energy. The optical energy gap (Eg) can be calculated using the Tauc equation:
( α h v ) 1 p = A ( h v − E g )
where A, Eg, h, and v are constant, energy gap, plank constant, and frequency, respectively; p is the characteristic value of the optical absorption process, which is equal to 2 because TiO2 is an indirect energy gap material; and α is a coefficient. When the thickness of TiO2 was increased from 10 nm to 40 nm, the bandgaps of T10, AT10, AT20, AT30, and AT40 were 3.84 3.88, 3.75, 3.66, and 3.66 eV, respectively. The band gaps shown in Figure 3b are smaller than that of the 10 nm TiO2 film with increases in the thickness of the TiO2. The bandgap reduced no further when the TiO2 thickness was greater than the size of the Ag nanoparticles [45].

3.2. UV and Blue Light Response

Figure 4a,b show the resistance–time relationship (bias: 1 V) of the Ag-TiO2 nanocomposite film (10 and 20 nm) and the TiO2 film (10 and 20 nm) under UV irradiation. Electrons and holes are generated when the films are irradiated by UV light, and the increased number of free electrons reduces the resistance. The light response of the composite was more significant than that of the TiO2 film, which means that the composite produced more electrons after UV irradiation [46].
An increase in the electrical conductivity of TiO2 under light irradiation and additional free carriers in the material can be generated in TiO2. The relationship of the resistance of the samples with and without light irradiation is as follows:
R L = R d ( σ d σ d + Δ σ ) ,   R d R L = 1 + Δ σ σ d ,
where RL, Rd, σd, and Δσ are the resistance with light irradiation, resistance in the dark, the conductivity, and the conductivity change, respectively. According to the above equation, the percentages of Δσ/Δσd for T10, T20, AT10, and AT20 for 50 s of light irradiation are 0.4%, 0.13%, 1.9%, and 1.1%, respectively. The value of Δσ/Δσd for Ag-TiO2 is 4–8 times greater than that of TiO2, which means that the conductivity of the semiconductors was obviously improved by doping them with metal nanoparticles. The conductivity increase indicates that either the carrier density or carrier mobility increased.
The insets of Figure 4a,b show the relationship between the rate of photocurrent change and the detection time. The current density is given by J = σE. The conductivity is σ0 = n0eμ0, where n0 and μ0 are the carrier density and mobility in the dark, respectively. The conductivity (σL) in light will increase to σL = σ0 + Δσ. The current change rate is given by dI/dt ∝ dσ/dt ∝ Δσ/Δt and is proportional to the carrier conductivity rate, where Δσ is attributed to the change in carrier density (Δn) and carrier mobility (Δμ). The resistance curves of AT10 and AT20 are more stable and significant than those of T10 and T20 (bias: 1 volt). The maximum current change rates of AT10 and AT20 are 0.7–0.8 and 0.4–0.5 (A/s), respectively, and are more significant than those of T10 and T20. The change is small for TiO2 under the same UV intensity. The differential curve fluctuated widely and was smoothed and averaged by several points. This variation is due to the SPR of the silver nanoparticles, whereby the silver nanoparticles provide TiO2 with hot electrons and reduce its optical band gap, thus generating more electrons in the conduction band of TiO2 with UV light irradiation.
The light response ((IL − Id)/Id) of light for 50 s irradiation is shown in Table 1. Therefore, the photo response of the Ag-TiO2 composite is better than that of the TiO2 film. This reveals that the generation and recombination rates of electrons and holes in the Ag-TiO2 composite film are much greater and faster than those of the TiO2 film [46].
When the Ag-TiO2 composite film is irradiated by blue light, the silver nanoparticles absorb the blue light to produce hot electrons for TiO2 and reduce the resistance value (Figure 5). This means that the composite film can absorb blue light. However, the 10 nm and 20 nm-thick TiO2 films showed no response to blue light.

3.3. Gas Sensing

Ozone is known to be an oxidizing gas. Figure 6 shows the resistance–time relationship of films at an ozone concentration of 100 ppb, which is the index value indicating damage to human health. TiO2 is an n-type semiconductor, and we generated more electrons and holes by light irradiation [47,48]. The ozone concentration of the test box is simultaneously measured by a commercial ozone monitor (2B Tech 106-L) [32,33]. When strongly oxidizing O3 was introduced (25 °C and relative humidity ~45 ± 3%), adsorption and desorption reactions occurred simultaneously. Since an oxidizing gas was adsorbed on the TiO2, the free electrons were trapped, causing a decrease in the number of free electrons and an increase in resistance. In our experiment, UV and blue light were used to excite electrons, and thereby, facilitate gas absorption by the films. In Figure 6a, we can see a noticeable change in the resistance upon the introduction of ozone to the test chamber. There was little difference in the resistance changes of films under different types of light irradiation. Figure 6b shows the dR/dt versus time relationship of films under different types of light. The resistance changes of T20 (UV), AT20 (UV), and AT20 (blue) were 0.005, 0.03, and 0.02, respectively, at 100 ppb of ozone. Thus, the composite film AT20 exhibited a better response than the TiO2 film. The sensitivities of ozone for 300 s exposure are shown in Table 2. The sensitivity, i.e., AT20 (UV) > AT20 (Blue) > T20 (UV) >> AT20, revealed the good performance of the composite film with respect to ozone. The response of the composite film increased by roughly six and four times under UV and blue light irradiation, respectively. The silver nanoparticles enhanced the effectiveness of the transfer of free electrons from the conduction band of TiO2 to ozone. Thus, we demonstrated that the Ag-TiO2 composite gas sensor can be used with visible light. In Table 3, we summarize the sensitivities for ozone using different materials, as obtained by various research groups.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we successfully used a composite of silver nanoparticles and titanium dioxide film (Ag-TiO2). Ultraviolet-visible spectra revealed that silver nanoparticles have a strong SPR effect. In addition, we observed a strong redshift of the plasmonic peak when the silver nanoparticles covered the TiO2 thin film.
When measuring the light and gas responses, we found the light response of the composite film to be more versatile and responsive due to the SPR effect with UV irradiation. Under UV and blue light irradiation, the silver-nanoparticle electrons become excited and supplement those of the TiO2 film. The value of conductivity change for Ag-TiO2 is 4–8 times greater than that of TiO2 under light irradiation. We determined that the SPR effect provides additional electrons to the TiO2, thereby improving the light response and sensitivity of the gas sensor. We also found the conductivity of TiO2 to increase with Ag doping. In our experiments, the Ag-TiO2 nanocomposite film successfully sensed 100 ppb ozone. The gas sensor can also be operated with blue light; the results showed that the composite film could absorb blue light, and thus, can be used for application in different sensors such as gas sensors, light sensors, biosensors, and smart windows [53].

Author Contributions

C.-H.W. conceived and designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript; T.-H.L. and P.-Y.S. performed the experiments.

Funding

This research was funded by the financial supports of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan, grant number MOST107-2112-M-005-011 and MOST108-2112-M-005-001.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the financial supports of the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (MOST108-2112-M-005-001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Xie, J.; Jiang, C.; Yu, J.; Zhang, P. Review on design and evaluation of environmental photocatalysts. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Anpo, M.; Kamat, P.V. Environmentally Benign Photocatalysts: Applications of Titanium Oxide-Based Materials; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Schneider, J.; Matsuoka, M.; Takeuchi, M.; Zhang, J.; Horiuchi, Y.; Anpo, M.; Bahnemann, D.W. Understanding TiO2 Photocatalysis: Mechanisms and Materials. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 9919–9986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Kumar, S.G.; Devi, L.G. Review on Modified TiO2 Photocatalysis under UV/Visible Light: Selected Results and Related Mechanisms on Interfacial Charge Carrier Transfer Dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 13211–13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Shehzad, N.; Tahir, M.; Johari, K.; Murugesan, T.; Hussain, M. A critical review on TiO2 based photocatalytic CO2 reduction system: Strategies to improve efficiency. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 26, 98–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pelaez, M.; Nolan, N.T.; Pillai, S.C.; Seery, M.K.; Falaras, P.; Kontos, A.G.; Dunlop, P.S.; Hamilton, J.W.; Byrne, J.A.; O’shea, K.; et al. A review on the visible light active titanium dioxide photocatalysts for environmental applications. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ayati, A.; Ahmadpour, A.; Bamoharram, F.F.; Tanhaei, B.; Mänttäri, M.; Sillanpää, M. A review on catalytic applications of Au/TiO2 nanoparticles in the removal of water pollutant. Chemosphere 2014, 107, 163–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Maijenburg, A.W.; Veerbeek, J.; de Putter, R.; Veldhuis, S.A.; Zoontjes, M.G.; Mul, G.; Montero-Moreno, J.M.; Nielsch, K.; Schäfer, H.; Steinhart, M.; et al. Electrochemical synthesis of coaxial TiO2-Ag nanowires and their application in photocatalytic water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 2648–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zieli´nska-Jurek, A.; Zaleska, A. Ag/Pt-modified TiO2 nanoparticles for toluene photooxidation in the gas phase. Catal. Today 2014, 230, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. He, C.; Xiong, Y.; Chen, J.; Zha, C.; Zhu, X. Photoelectrochemical performance of Ag-TiO2/ITO film and photoelectrocatalytic activity towards the oxidation of organic pollutants. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2013, 157, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yu, D.H.; Yu, X.; Wang, C.; Liu, X.C.; Xing, Y. Synthesis of natural cellulose-templated TiO2/Ag nanosponge composites and photocatalytic properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2012, 4, 2781–2787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ge, M.Z.; Cao, C.Y.; Li, S.H.; Tang, Y.X.; Wang, L.N.; Qi, N.; Huang, J.Y.; Zhang, K.Q.; Al-Deyab, S.S.; Lai, Y.K. In situ plasmonic Ag nanoparticle anchored TiO2 nanotube arrays as visible-light-driven photocatalysts for enhanced water splitting. Nanoscale 2016, 8, 5226–5234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, J.H.; Mirzaei, A.; Kim, H.W.; Kim, S.S. Extremely sensitive and selective sub-ppm CO detection by the synergistic effect of Au nanoparticles and core–shell nanowires. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 249, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Genix, A.C.; Schmitt-Pauly, C.; Alauzun, J.G.; Bizien, T.; Mutin, P.H.; Oberdisse, J. Tuning Local Nanoparticle Arrangements in TiO2-Polymer Nanocomposites by Grafting of Phosphonic Acids. Macromolecules 2017, 50, 7721–7729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hirakawa, T.; Kamat, P.V. Charge separation and catalytic activity of Ag@TiO2–core-shell composite clusters under UV-irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3928–3934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zhu, Z.; Chang, J.L.; Wu, R.J. Fast ozone detection by using a core–shell Au@TiO2sensor at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 214, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Singh, J.; Sahu, K. Thermal annealing induced strong photoluminescence enhancement in Ag-TiO2 plasmonic nanocomposite thin films. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 786, 750–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, X.; Li, B.; Zhang, B.; Shao, L.; Wu, Y. Au@ZnO core–shell nanostructures with plasmon-induced visible-light photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2016, 3, 934–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wu, W.Y.; Hsu, C.F.; Wu, M.J.; Chen, C.N.; Huang, J.J. Ag–TiO2 composite photoelectrode for dye-sensitized solar cell. Appl. Phys. A 2017, 123, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lou, Z.; Han, H.; Zhou, M.; Wan, J.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, X.; Gu, N. Fabrication of Magnetic Conjugation Clusters via Intermolecular Assembling for Ultrasensitive Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) Detection in a Wide Range of Concentrations. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 13472–13479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lou, Z.; Han, H.; Mao, D.; Jiang, Y.; Song, J. Qualitative and Quantitative Detection of PrPSc Based on the Controlled Release Property of Magnetic Microspheres Using Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR). Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lou, Z.; Wan, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, X.; Cheng, S.; Gu, N. Quick and sensitive SPR detection of prion disease-associated isoform(PrPSc) based on its self-assembling behavior on bare gold film andspecific interactions with aptamer-graphene oxide (AGO). Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2017, 157, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Deng, Z.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Wu, C.H. Improving the SERS signals of biomolecules using a stacked biochip containing Fe2O3/Au nanoparticles and a DC magnetic field. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, K.L.; Yeh, Y.W.; Chen, J.M.; Hong, Y.J.; Huang, T.L.; Deng, Z.Y.; Wu, C.H.; Liao, S.H.; Wang, L.M. Influence of magnetoplasmonic γ-Fe2O3/Au core/shell nanoparticles on low-field nuclear magnetic resonance. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Liu, S.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Wang, Y. Temperature Sensor Based on Side-Polished Fiber SPR Device Coated with Polymer. Sensors 2019, 19, 4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qi, F.; Wang, C.; Cheng, N.; Liu, P.; Xiao, Y.; Li, F.; Sun, X.; Liu, W.; Guo, S.; Zhao, X.Z. Improving the performance through SPR effect by employing Au@SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles incorporated TiO2 scaffold in efficient hole transport material free perovskite solar cells. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 282, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, S.-Q.; Sun, B.; Zhang, W.; Wang, D. Preparation and antibacterial activity of Ag-TiO2 composite film by liquid phase deposition (LPD) method. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2008, 31, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.; Faria, J.L.; Dong, S.; Chang, Y. Mesoporous Au/TiO2 composites preparation, characterization, and photocatalytic properties. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2012, 177, 913–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Binyu, Y.; Man, L.K.; Qiuquan, G.; Ming, L.W.; Jun, Y. Synthesis of Ag-TiO2 composite nano thin film for antimicrobial application. Nanotechnology 2011, 22, 115603. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang, F.X.; Hwangbo, C.K.; Jung, B.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, B.H.; Kim, N.Y. optical and structural properties of TiO2 films deposited from Ti3O5 by electron beam. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2007, 201, 5367–5370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shei, S.-C. Optical and Structural Properties of Titanium Dioxide Films from TiO2 and Ti3O5 Starting Materials Annealed at Various Temperatures. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2013, 2013, 545076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, C.W.; Huang, K.L.; Chang, K.W.; Chen, J.H.; Chen, K.L.; Wu, C.H. Ultraviolet photodetector and gas sensor based on amorphous In-Ga-Zn-O film. Thin Solid Film. 2016, 618, 73–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, C.H.; Jiang, G.J.; Chiu, C.C.; Paul, C.; Jeng, C.C.; Wu, R.J.; Chen, J.H. Fast gas concentration sensing by analyzing the rate of resistance change. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 209, 906–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, C.H.; Chang, K.W.; Li, Y.N.; Deng, Z.Y.; Chen, K.L.; Jeng, C.C.; Wu, R.J.; Chen, J.H. Improving the sensitive and selective of trace amount ozone sensor on Indium-Gallium-Zinc Oxide thin film by ultraviolet irradiation. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 273, 1713–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Liu, X.; Li, D.; Sun, X.; Li, Z.; Song, H.; Jiang, H.; Chen, Y. Tunable Dipole Surface Plasmon Resonances of Silver Nanoparticles by Cladding Dielectric Layers. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 12555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Lee, K.C.; Lin, S.J.; Lin, C.H.; Tsai, C.S.; Lu, Y.J. Size effect of Ag nanoparticles on surface plasmon resonance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 5339–5342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lee, S.Y.; Cho, E.S.; Kwon, S.J. The optical analyses of the multilayer transparent electrode and the formation of ITO/Mesh-Ag/ITO multilayers for enhancing an optical transmittance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 487, 990–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sanzone, G.; Zimbone, M.; Cacciato, G.; Ruffino, F.; Carles, R.; Privitera, V.; Grimaldi, M.G. Ag/TiO2 nanocomposite for visible light-driven photocatalysis. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 123, 394–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jiang, M.M.; Chen, Y.H.; Li, H.B.; Liu, W.K.; Shan, X.C.; Shen, Z.D. Hybrid quadrupolar resonances stimulated at short wavelengths using coupled plasmonic silver nanoparticle aggregation Hybrid quadrupolar resonances stimulated at short wavelengths using coupled plasmonic silver nanoparticle aggregation. J. Mater. Chem. C 2014, 2, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hooshmand, N.; Mostafa, A. El-Sayed, Collective multipole oscillations direct the plasmonic coupling at the nanojunction interfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 19299–19304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Miroshnichenko, A.E.; Kivshar, Y.S. Fano Resonances in All-Dielectric Oligomers. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 6459–6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yakovlev, A.B.; Hedayati, M.; Silveirinha, M.G.; Hanson, G.W. Local thickness-dependent permittivity model for nonlocal bounded wire-medium structures. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 155442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhang, X.; Chen, Y.L.; Liu, R.S.; Tsai, D.P. Plasmonic photocatalysis. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2013, 76, 046401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Méndez-Medrano, M.G.; Kowalska, E.; Lehoux, A.; Herissan, A.; Ohtani, B.; Bahena, D.; Briois, V.; Colbeau-Justin, C.; Rodríguez-López, J.L.; Remita, H. Surface Modification of TiO2 with Ag Nanoparticles and CuO Nanoclusters for Application in Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 5143–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Khore, S.K.; Kadam, S.R.; Naik, S.D.; Kale, B.B.; Sonawane, R.S. Solar light active plasmonic Au@TiO2 nanocomposite with superior photocatalytic performance for H2 production and pollutant degradation. New J. Chem. 2018, 42, 10958–10968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sharma, A.; Kumar, R.; Bhattacharyya, B.; Husale, S. Hot electron induced NIR detection in CdS films. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Buso, D.; Post, M.; Cantalini, C.; Mulvaney, P.; Martucci, A. Gold Nanoparticle-Doped TiO2 Semiconductor Thin Films: Gas Sensing Properties. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2008, 18, 3843–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Rai, P.; Khan, R.; Raj, S.; Majhi, S.M.; Park, K.K.; Yu, Y.T.; Lee, I.H.; Sekhar, P.K. Au@Cu2O core–shell nanoparticles as chemiresistors for gas sensor applications: Effect of potential barrier modulation on the sensing performance. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 581–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Avansi, W., Jr.; Catto, A.C.; da Silva, L.F.; Fiorido, T.; Bernardini, S.; Mastelaro, V.R.; Aguir, K.; Arenal, R. One-Dimensional V2O5/TiO2 Heterostructures for Chemiresistive Ozone Sensors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4756–4764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Onofre, Y.J.; Catto, A.C.; Bernardini, S.; Fiorido, T.; Aguir, K.; Longo, E.; Mastelaro, V.R.; da Silva, L.F.; de Godoy, M.P. Highly selective ozone gas sensor based on nanocrystalline Zn0.95Co0.05O thin film obtained via spray pyrolysis technique. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 478, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Catto, A.C.; Fiorido, T.; Souza, É.L.; Avansi, W., Jr.; Andres, J.; Aguir, K.; Longo, E.; Cavalcante, L.S.; Da Silva, L.F. Improving the ozone gas-sensing properties of CuWO4 nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 748, 411–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wu, R.J.; Chen, C.Y.; Chen, M.H.; Sun, Y.L. Photoreduction measurement of ozone usingPt/TiO2–SnO2 material at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007, 123, 1077–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nunes, D.; Pimentel, A.; Gonçalves, A.; Pereira, S.; Branquinho, R.; Barquinha, P.; Fortunato, E.; Martins, R. Metal oxide nanostructures for sensor applications. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2019, 34, 043001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sensors 19 05061 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM images of the (a) Ag nanoparticles with the average size of 28 nm. The inset shows the distribution of particle sizes. (b) the Ag nanoparticles covering the TiO2 film film.
Figure 1. SEM images of the (a) Ag nanoparticles with the average size of 28 nm. The inset shows the distribution of particle sizes. (b) the Ag nanoparticles covering the TiO2 film film.
Sensors 19 05061 g001
Sensors 19 05061 g002 550
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the Ag-TiO2 composite.
Figure 2. The X-ray diffraction pattern of the Ag-TiO2 composite.
Sensors 19 05061 g002
Sensors 19 05061 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) The transmittance and absorption spectra of the samples. (b) The optical energy gap calculated by the Tauc equation.
Figure 3. (a) The transmittance and absorption spectra of the samples. (b) The optical energy gap calculated by the Tauc equation.
Sensors 19 05061 g003
Sensors 19 05061 g004 550
Figure 4. (a,b) show the resistance–time relation of Ag-TiO2 and TiO2 with different thickness under UV irradiation.
Figure 4. (a,b) show the resistance–time relation of Ag-TiO2 and TiO2 with different thickness under UV irradiation.
Sensors 19 05061 g004
Sensors 19 05061 g005 550
Figure 5. Ag-TiO2 composite film is irradiated by blue light.
Figure 5. Ag-TiO2 composite film is irradiated by blue light.
Sensors 19 05061 g005
Sensors 19 05061 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) The resistance–time relation of films at an ozone concentration of 100 ppb under different light irradiation. (b) Differential curves under light irradiation.
Figure 6. (a) The resistance–time relation of films at an ozone concentration of 100 ppb under different light irradiation. (b) Differential curves under light irradiation.
Sensors 19 05061 g006
Table
Table 1. The response ((IL − Id)/Id) of light for 50 s light irradiation.
Table 1. The response ((IL − Id)/Id) of light for 50 s light irradiation.
T10AT10T20AT20
UV0.2%1.7%0.1%1.2%
BlueX0.45%X0.46%
Table
Table 2. The sensitivity ((Rg − Ra)/Ra) of gas ozone for 300 s gas exposure.
Table 2. The sensitivity ((Rg − Ra)/Ra) of gas ozone for 300 s gas exposure.
T20AT20
BlueUVBlueUV
OzoneX0.35%0.38%0.8%
Table
Table 3. The response of ozone using different materials (R. T: Room temperature, * S = Rg/Rair, # S = (Rg − Rair)/Rair).
Table 3. The response of ozone using different materials (R. T: Room temperature, * S = Rg/Rair, # S = (Rg − Rair)/Rair).
MaterialsOzone (ppb)Operating TemperatureResponseReference
core–shell Au@TiO2500R. T1.15 *[16]
V2O5/TiO2 1000300 °C1.4 #[49]
Zn0.95Co0.05O20250 °C0.4 #[50]
CuWO4 15250 °C~2 *[51]
Pt/TiO2-SnO22500 R.T.(UV)1100 *[52]
Ag/TiO2100R.T. (Blue) 1.004 *Present study

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lo, T.-H.; Shih, P.-Y.; Wu, C.-H. The Response of UV/Blue Light and Ozone Sensing Using Ag-TiO2 Planar Nanocomposite Thin Film. Sensors 2019, 19, 5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235061

AMA Style

Lo T-H, Shih P-Y, Wu C-H. The Response of UV/Blue Light and Ozone Sensing Using Ag-TiO2 Planar Nanocomposite Thin Film. Sensors. 2019; 19(23):5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lo, Tzu-Hsuan, Pen-Yuan Shih, and Chiu-Hsien Wu. 2019. "The Response of UV/Blue Light and Ozone Sensing Using Ag-TiO2 Planar Nanocomposite Thin Film" Sensors 19, no. 23: 5061. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19235061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop