Next Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence Applied to a Robotic Dairy Farm to Model Milk Productivity and Quality based on Cow Data and Daily Environmental Parameters
Next Article in Special Issue
Double Role of Diphenylpyridine Derivatives as Fluorescent Sensors for Monitoring Photopolymerization and the Determination of the Efficiencies of the Generation of Superacids by Cationic Photoinitiators
Previous Article in Journal
Simultaneous Hand Gesture Classification and Finger Angle Estimation via a Novel Dual-Output Deep Learning Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Spectroscopic Techniques for a Rapid and Non-Destructive Monitoring of Thermal Treatments and Storage Time of Sous-Vide Cooked Cod Fillets
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Exploring the Effects of Various Polymeric Backbones on the Performance of a Hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-Triazole Anion Sensor

Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(10), 2973; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102973
Submission received: 24 April 2020 / Revised: 14 May 2020 / Accepted: 19 May 2020 / Published: 24 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fluorescence-Based Sensors)

Abstract

:
Polymeric chemosensors are vital sensing tools because of higher sensitivity compared to their monomeric counterparts and tunable mechanical properties. This study focuses on the incorporation of a hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-triazole sensor, 2-(4-phenyl 1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenol (PTP), into polymers. By itself, the triazole has a selective, fluorometric response to the fluoride, acetate, and dihydrogen phosphate anions, and is most responsive to fluoride. Current investigations probe the suitability of various polymeric backbones for the retention and enhancement of the triazole’s sensing capabilities. Backbones derived from acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, divinylbenzene, and styrene were explored. UV-illumination, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) titration, and ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy studies are used to investigate the performance of newly synthesized polymers and the derivatives of PTP that serve as the polymers’ precursors. Among the polymers investigated, copolymers with styrene proved best; these systems retained the sensing capabilities and were amenable to tuning for sensitivity.

1. Introduction

Ions are ubiquitous, from their roles in the regulation of enzymatic behaviors, and metabolic processes to their broad use in the production of pharmaceuticals [1,2]. An imbalance or inadequacy of certain ions can have serious health consequences. With fluoride (F) for example, an excess of 3–6 mg/L in drinking water causes fluorosis, and a deficiency results in tooth decay and osteoporosis [3].
Facile and cost-efficient methods for monitoring ions are very much needed [4,5,6]. Small molecular chemosensors, due to their sensitivity and simplicity, are viable detection tools for trace amounts of analytes [7,8,9]. Polymers based on such sensors have a comparative advantage over the single-molecule systems [10,11,12]. Polymeric derivatives can lead to heightened sensitivity and targeted material-design to suit the physical needs of an environment.
1,2,3-Triazoles have shown excellent promise as sensors for cation and anion recognition [13,14,15]. These structures are N-donors in cation-sensing [14,16] and Csp2-H hydrogen bond donors in anion-sensing [17,18,19]. Triazoles are easily synthesized from azide and alkyne precursors via copper-catalyzed azide-alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) (Scheme 1) [20]. Previously, we developed an efficient 1,2,3-triazole sensor, 2-(4-phenyl 1H-1,2,3-triazol-1-yl)phenol (PTP), that, under UV-light, ‘‘turns-on’’ in the presence of fluoride (F), acetate (AcO), and dihydrogen phosphate (H2PO4) (Scheme 2) [21]. The response output is a blue, fluorescent signal that is strongest with fluoride. The binding constants with each of those ions are 9.0 × 103 M−1, 6.0 × 103 M−1, 4.9 × 103 M−1 for F, H2PO4, and AcO, respectively. The triazolyl ring is an integral part of the conjugative network that is responsible for the fluorescence signaling [22]. The molecule’s receptor site is the phenolic −OH with which the anion-binding cavity is created by the −OH and the triazole’s Csp2−H units (Scheme 2). During detection, OH group hydrogen bonds with the anion and the triazolyl Csp2−H via its hydrogen and oxygen, respectively [22,23]. Importantly, the turn-on signal is only elicited with anions that have the requisite basicity to deprotonate the −OH receptor site in the excited state. As such, while PTP detects F, other halides such as bromide, chloride and iodide cannot induce a response [23]. Furthermore, as long as a signal-inducing anion can hydrogen bond to the receptor site, all evidence suggests that the turn-on response in PTP would not be affected by the counter ion.
The work described herein consists of the immobilization of a PTP derivative onto a polymeric backbone. More specifically, as we look towards future applications with thin films, the main goal of the current study is to find the most suitable polymer substrates for the retention (and possible enhancement) of PTP’s sensing capabilities. The general approach for the polymer synthesis involves a free radical copolymerization of an acrylamide derivative of PTP with pre-selected traditional monomers, acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, divinylbenzene, and styrene (Scheme 3). AIBN (azobisisobutyronitrile) is used as the free radical initiator in all cases. Copolymers that preserved the detection capabilities were subjected to detailed analyses with ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) and fluorescence spectroscopy. During this work, the sensing properties of PTP-derived polymer precursors were also assessed. This study is an important precedent for the development of tunable, supported PTP-based materials.

2. Materials and Methods

All reactants and chemicals were obtained from commercial sources and used without further purification unless noted. HPLC grade solvents and de-ionized water were used for the syntheses and all other experiments. Anhydrous Tetrahydrofuran (THF) used in reactions requiring air-free/dry conditions was obtained from MBraun Manual Solvent Purification System and stored over 4 Å molecular sieves under nitrogen gas prior to use. Flash column chromatography was performed using Sorbent technologies Silica gel with particle size 40–63 microns. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on Agilent MR4000DD2 spectrometer with a multinuclear probe with two RF channels and variable temperature capability. 1H-NMR: 400 MHz and 13C NMR: 100 MHz; the solvents used were deuterated acetonitrile (CD3CN) and dimethyl sulfoxide ((CD3)2SO). NMR signals were recorded in parts per million (ppm) relative to the residual in each solvent. Signals are described as singlet (s), doublet (d), doublet of doublet (dd), triplet (t), multiplet (m); coupling constants (J; Hz), and with integration. Melting points were measured with Vernier Melt Station using Vernier LabQuest 2 and are uncorrected.
Room temperature absorption and steady-state fluorescence measurements were performed using a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer and PerkinElmer LS55 with well plate reader fluorimeter, respectively. For fluorescence experiments, the scan type was emission with a single mode. The excitation wavelength was 300 nm with a scan speed of 100 nm/min and a scanning interval of 0.5 nm. The gain was medium. Scan range was 305 nm to 595 nm. The excitation slit was 5 nm and the emission slit was 2.5 nm. For absorbance experiments, the measuring mode was absorption with a wavelength range of 200 nm to 600 nm and a sampling interval of 1.0 nm. The scan mode was single, the slit width was 2.0 nm, the light source change wavelength was 360 nm, the S/R exchange was set at normal and scan speed was set as fast.
Solutions of the tetrabutylammonium salts were prepared in acetonitrile for fluorescence and UV-Vis spectroscopy investigations, and in deuterated acetonitrile for the NMR titration. If solutions of the copolymers were used, 500 mg of the polymer’s pellets were dissolved in 20 mL of the appropriate solvent (Table S1). Information regarding the solvents for the polymer solutions, equivalents, volumes, and concentrations for each experiment are provided in the figures.

2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Precursors (PTP Derivatives)

2-(4-(4-nitrophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-1-yl)phenol (P01) and 2-(4-(4-Aminophenyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-1-yl)phenol (P02) were synthesized according the procedures in Ghosh et al. [23].

2.1.1. Synthesis of 2-(4-(4-N-phenylacrylamide)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-1-yl)Phenol or P03

Compound P02 (253 mg, 1 mmol) and imidazole (68.0 mg, 1 mmol) were dissolved in anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (10 mL) in an oven-dried, round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar and a nitrogen inlet. The mixture was cooled to at 0 °C. Acryloyl chloride (0.08 mL, 1 mmol) was added to the reaction. The reaction was stirred vigorously for 24 h. The resulting mixture was filtered through glass wool in a long stem funnel. The crude dried product was collected by rotary evaporation and purified using silica plug (50% ethyl acetate in hexanes mixed with 1.0% methanol) to give a light brown solid, 230 mg (74%). M.P.: 189.1 – 191.1 oC. 1H NMR (400 MHz, (CD3)2SO)] δ 10.53 (s, 1-H), 10.24 (s, 1-H), 8.80 (s, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2-H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2-H), 7.57 (dd, J = 7.9, 1.7 Hz, 1-H), 7.33 (m, 1H), 7.10 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.2 Hz, 1-H), 6.97 (td, J = 7.8, 1.3 Hz, 1-H), 6.43 (dd, J = 17.0, 10.1 Hz, 1-H), 6.25 (dd, J = 17.0, 2.0 Hz, 1-H), 5.74 (dd, J = 10.1, 2.0 Hz, 1-H); 13C-NMR [100 MHz, (CD3)2SO)] δ 163.6, 150.4, 146.3, 139.2, 132.2, 130.8, 127.5, 126.3, 126.2, 125.9, 125.0, 122.9, 120.1, 119.9, 117.4.
The structure P03 is fully characterized by 1D and 2D NMR spectra (Supporting Information-Section II).

2.1.2. Synthesis of Polymeric Chemosensors: P04, P05, P06, and P07

The incorporation of compound P03 onto different polymer backbones was accomplished by a bulk free-radical copolymerization of P03 with reactive co-monomers of interest, namely acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, divinylbenzene, and styrene, generating samples P04, P05, P06, and P07, respectively. For all polymeric chemosensor syntheses, azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) was used as the free radical initiator. To match the concentration of chemosensor used in previous studies in solution [21,24,25], P04, P05, P06, and P07 were prepared with a P03 concentration of 0.1 mol%. Additionally, another two styrene-based chemosensors were synthesized with P03 concentrations of 1.0 mol% and 10.0 mol%. The general procedure for the synthesis of P04, P05, P06, and P07 consisted of mixing the pre-determined amounts of P03 and 10.0 g of the desired co-monomer in a 20 mL scintillation vial. After the addition of 0.5 g of AIBN, the vial was capped and placed in a convection oven at 60 ˚C for 4 h.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthetic Approach

3.1.1. Synthesis of the Monomeric Sensor

The PTP core was functionalized with an acrylamide group for copolymerization with other reactive unsaturated monomers (Scheme 3). The approach began with the synthesis of nitro analog P01 using the CuAAC reaction between 2-azidophenol and 1-ethynyl-4-nitrobenzene. P01 was subsequently reduced to P02 in which the inclusion of the amino group served two purposes. First, the amino group was reacted with acryloyl chloride to provide the desired monomer P03. Second, the electron-donating ability of the amino group enhances the fluorescent response of the sensor [23,26,27,28]. P03 was synthesized from P02 in 74% yield.

3.1.2. Synthesis of Polymers

The general synthetic route for the copolymerization with P03 is shown in Scheme 3. P03 was reacted with acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, divinylbenzene, and styrene to make P04, P05, P06, and P07, respectively (Figure 1). In all cases, AIBN was used as the initiator for bulk free-radical polymerization. The polymeric sensors prepared with acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, and divinylbenzene were made with a P03 concentration of 0.1 mol% to mimic the solution concentration of PTP used in earlier sensing studies [21,24,25]. This allowed for a comparative analysis between earlier data and the immobilized sensors described here. With styrene, samples containing 1.0 mol% and 10.0 mol% P03 were also prepared.

3.2. Anion Detection

The response of the polymeric sensors and their precursors to the tetrabutylammonium (TBA) salts of different anions were investigated. Studies under visible and ultraviolet (UV) light were used to determine if the unique detection properties of the PTP core were retained at each step. These studies probed whether or not F, AcO, and H2PO4 still induced a selective, blue, fluorescent response for which the strongest signal output occurs with F.
With the exception of P06, all investigations were carried out in acetonitrile or co-solvent mixtures based on each copolymer’s solubility (Table S1). P06 was insoluble in all of the solvents tested.

3.2.1. Response with Synthetic Precursors

Screening studies with P01/2/3 were carried out in acetonitrile with TBA salts (ClO4, F, Br, H2PO4, I, Cl, AcO, BF4) at a molar ratio of 1:1 (P01/2/3: salt) under UV (365 nm) and ambient light.
Under ambient and UV light P01 was non-responsive to all the anions including H2PO4, AcO, and F (Figure S1). To verify that the non-response under UV illumination was due to the nitro group and not a compromised anion-receptor site, an NMR titration experiment with P01 and TBAF was performed (Figure 2). With increasing equivalents of TBAF, a downfield shift of the triazole proton (H-8) and an upfield shift of the phenol’s H-5, H-6, and H-4 occurred. Eventually, the resonances of H-8, H-6, and H-4 broadened out into the baseline of the spectra. Consistent with the behavior of PTP and similar molecules [14,21,24,25], these changes in the H-8 and phenol group’s chemical shifts indicated coordination between P01′s −OH unit and F (Scheme 2 and Figure 2). Thus, the non-fluorometric response of P01 was solely due to the quenching effect of the nitro group [29,30,31]. The anion-receptor site was intact.
Once the nitro group was converted to −NH2, the turn-on, blue fluorescent signal for anion detection was recovered with P02 [23]. Screening with the TBA salts showed a selective response to H2PO4, AcO, and Fwhere the intensity of signal-output was greatest with Fand weakest with H2PO4. Similar results were obtained with the acrylamide P03 which gave a distinct signal-output for F and AcO (Figure S2).

3.2.2. Response with Copolymers P04, P05, P06, and P07

The anion detection abilities of copolymers with acrylic acid P04, methyl methacrylate P05, divinylbenzene P06, and styrene P07 were explored. Promising results were obtained with P07. With the exception of P06, the sensing behavior of each polymer was studied in an aprotic solvent in which the polymer was most soluble (Table S1). It should be noted that the choice of solvent for the studies below is based on polymers’ solubility and the absence of H-bond donors in the solvent molecules. H-bond donors in the solvent would compete with the sensor unit’s −OH receptor site.
With P07 (P03-styrene, 0.1 mol% P03) in toluene solution, initial investigation under UV light showed an exclusive, blue fluorescent response to F- at the anion concentrations studied (Figure 3). Higher P03 loading of 1.0 mol% and 10.0 mol% increased the intensity of that response and in the process, yielded polymers that also detected H2PO4 and AcO. As with the native molecule PTP, under ambient light, the appearance of the P07 solutions did not change regardless of the anion present (Figure S6). Overall, the variation in detection performance with the different sensor loadings points to the capacity to tune the sensitivity of P07-type chemosensors using the P03 mol% content.
The side chains of P04-6 proved incompatible with the PTP core’s sensing mechanism. P04 (P03- acrylic acid) in DMF solution fluoresced blue in the absence and presence of all salts under the 365nm lamp (Figure S3). This polymer has H-bond donating −COOH side chains that are most likely disrupting the phenolic −OH-anion interaction needed for a signal-response [22,23]. P05 (P03-methyl methacrylate) in chloroform is non-fluorescent under UV light and remains that way when treated with the anions (Figure S4). In this case, the poly(methyl methacrylate) backbone may be quenching fluorescence, possibly through a process like photoinduced electron transfer (PET) [32,33,34]. P06 (P03-divinylbenzene) was insoluble in all of the solvents tested and as such, screening was performed with solid samples. P06 with its cross-linked aryl side chains fluoresces under UV illumination (Figure S5) [35,36,37]. Treatment with drops of the anion solutions on P06 pellets failed to elicit any type of signal.

3.2.3. Absorbance Spectroscopy

The absorbance studies focused on the behavior of the P07 (0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mol% P03) with F The λmax before and after the addition of fluoride was the same, 292 nm for all P03 loadings (Figure S7). The 292 nm band is due to the polystyrene backbone [38]. Treatment with TBAF produced slight variations in the λmax intensities.

3.2.4. Fluorescence Spectroscopy

P07 (0.1 mol% P03) was used to explore the polymer’s response to a series of anions (ClO4, F, Br, H2PO4, I, Cl, AcO, BF4) (Figure 4). An excitation wavelength of 300 nm was used for these studies. The excitation wavelengths for the parent PTP and the solvent, toluene, are within a few nanometers of each other [21,39]. PTP’s excitation wavelength was determined to be 290 nm. As such, a slightly longer excitation wavelength of 300 nm was used in the current work so that a credible comparison between P07 and PTP could be made while also preventing interference from the solvent. Consistent with the visual observations in Figure 3 and the behavior of PTP (with F, fluorescence λmax= 430 nm), the most distinct change occurred with the addition of TBAF. The polymer had a weak fluorescence λmax at ~395 nm which, in the presence of fluoride, red-shifted to 410 nm. The latter signal registered a considerable increase in the intensity as well.
The F detection capabilities of P07 with three loadings of P03 were investigated (Figure 5). The P07 fluorescence λmax was the same for 0.1 and 1.0 mol% P03, ~395 nm, but different for 10 mol% P03, 385 nm. In all cases, the addition of TBAF resulted in a bathochromic shift to 410 nm and a marked increase in intensity. Importantly, the signal intensity during detection was proportional to the P03 content.
Fluorescence titration studies probed the behavior of P07 (0.1 mol% P03) with varying concentrations of fluoride (Figure 6). As anticipated, the 410 nm detection signal became stronger with increasing equivalents of fluoride. A Benesi–Hildebrand plot of the inverse of the change in fluorescence intensity (1/ΔF) versus the inverse of fluoride concentration [TBAF]−1 was linear suggesting a 1:1 binding interaction between the P07′s sensor unit and fluoride (Figure 7A). Based on this plot, the binding constant (K) is 7.72 × 103 M−1. The stoichiometry and K for the P07-fluoride interaction are similar to that of the parent PTP for which the ratio is 1:1, PTP:fluoride, and K= 9 × 103 M−1 [21].
The following equation was used to calculate K [40]:
1/ΔF = 1/ΔFmax + 1/K ∙ 1/ΔFmax ∙ 1/[TBAF]
where ΔF = Fx – F0; ΔFmax = F – F0. F0, Fx and F are the fluorescence intensities of P07 in the absence, at an intermediate concentration, and a concentration of complete interaction with the anion.
Significantly, P07′s limit of detection (LOD), ~1.09 × 10−4 M, is below the recommended level of fluoride in drinking water (3–6 mg/L) (Figure 7B) [3]. The LOD was determined with a calibration curve which is also linear, a plot of F/F0 versus [TBAF] where F is the fluorescence intensity after the addition of the anion.

4. Conclusions

The suitability of polymeric backbones for the immobilization of an anion sensor (PTP) and the retention of its detection capabilities were explored using copolymers derived from an acrylamide derivative of PTP and various unsaturated monomers (acrylic acid, methyl methacrylate, divinylbenzene, and styrene). The parent molecule PTP selectively detects fluoride (F), acetate (AcO), and dihydrogen phosphate (H2PO4) with a blue, turn-on fluorescent response. Copolymerization with styrene (0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mol% PTP-acrylamide), P07, preserved the sensing properties; all other backbones muted the detection signal. Furthermore, studies using UV-illumination and fluorescence spectroscopy demonstrated that the sensitivity of P07 could be controlled with the sensor loading. At the anion concentrations used in these studies, an exclusive response to F- was obtained with the copolymer comprised of 0.1 mol% sensor. Higher loadings of 1.0 mol% and 10.0 mol%, gave more intense signals with F- as well as responses to AcO and H2PO4. The performance of the PTP-derived precursors for the copolymers were also studied. With the exception of the nitro derivative P01, the detection abilities of the precursors P02 and P03 were consistent with the parent molecule. Overall, the results of this investigation show great promise for the development of tunable, supported, PTP-based materials copolymerized with styrene. Future work will involve the investigation of copolymer P07 as a solid device (thin film and coated paper).

Supplementary Materials

Available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/10/2973/s1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra: Compound P03, 1H-NMR Spectrum [Solvent: (CD3)2SO]; Compound P03, 13C-NMR Spectrum [Solvent: (CD3)2SO]; Compound P03, 2D COSY Spectrum [Solvent: (CD3)2SO]; Compound P03, 2D HSQC Spectrum [Solvent: (CD3)2SO]. Solubility Test: Table S1. Solubility Test for Polymers. Figure S1. Response of P01 (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3M, solvent: acetonitrile) treated with of different TBA salts of anions (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3M, solvent: acetonitrile) under (A) ambient and (B) ultraviolet light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P01 solution, 1:1. Figure S2. Response of P03 (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) treated with of different TBA salts of anions (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under (A) ambient and (B) ultraviolet light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P03 solution, 1:1. Figure S3. P04 (solvent: DMF) treated with different TBA salts of anions (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under (A) ambient and (B) ultraviolet light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P04 solution, 1:1. Figure S4. P05 (solvent: chloroform) treated with different TBA salts of anions (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under (A) ambient and (B) ultraviolet light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P05 solution, 1:1. Figure S5. P06 treated with different TBA salts of anions (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 x 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under (A) ambient and (B) ultraviolet light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution= 1.0 mL. Figure S6. Response of P07 (solvent: toluene) with P03 loadings of (A) 0.1 mol%, (B) 1.0 mol%, and (C) 10.0 mol% to TBA salts (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under ambient light. Volume of anion solution: Volume of P07 solution, 1:1. Figure S7. Absorbance spectrum of P07 (solvent: toluene) with TBAF (3.88 × 10−5 M, stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, R.L.Q., S.M.L., D.G., and K.S.A.; formal analysis and investigation, A.U., K.M., U.O., and K.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, A.U., R.Q., and K.S.A.; writing—review and editing, S.M.L. and D.G.; supervision and project administration, R.L.Q., D.G., S.M.L., and K.S.A.; funding acquisition, R.L.Q., S.M.L., D.G., and K.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Chemistry and Biochemistry department at Georgia Southern (GS) University; the National Science Foundation (NSF) (CHE 1359229 [REU])—K. Y. and the GS Faculty Research Committee (FRC) Award—S. L., D. G., and K. A.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Jeffery Orvis and Nathan Takas for their technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Guo, A.; Zhu, R.; Ren, Y.; Dong, J.; Feng, L. A “turn-on” fluorescent chemosensor for aluminum ion and cell imaging application. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2016, 153, 530–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kaur, N.; Kaur, G.; Fegade, U.A.; Singh, A.; Sahoo, S.K.; Kuwar, A.S.; Singh, N. Anion sensing with chemosensors having multiple NH recognition units. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2017, 95, 86–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Balan Pillai, A.; Varghese, B.; Madhusoodanan, K.N. Design and Development of Novel Sensors for the Determination of Fluoride in Water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 404–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, G.; Tao, F.; Wang, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, L. A novel reversible colorimetric chemosensor for rapid naked-eye detection of Cu2+ in pure aqueous solution. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 211, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Madhusudhana Reddy, P.; Hsieh, S.-R.; Chen, J.-K.; Chang, C.-J.; Kang, J.-Y.; Chen, C.-H. Robust, sensitive and facile method for detection of F, CN and Ac anions. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2017, 186, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sakai, R.; Barasa, E.B.; Sakai, N.; Sato, S.-I.; Satoh, T.; Kakuchi, T. Colorimetric Detection of Anions in Aqueous Solution Using Poly(phenylacetylene) with Sulfonamide Receptors Activated by Electron Withdrawing Group. Macromolecules 2012, 45, 8221–8227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kaewtong, C.; Kampaengsri, S.; Singhana, B.; Pulpoka, B. Highly selective detection of Au3+ using rhodamine-based modified polyacrylic acid (PAA)-coated ITO. Dye. Pigment. 2017, 141, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chua, H.M.; Shah, W.K.; Zhou, H.; Xu, J. Recent Advances in Aggregation-Induced Emission Chemosensors for Anion Sensing. Molecules 2019, 24, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wu, D.; Sedgwick, A.C.; Gunnlaugsson, T.; Akkaya, E.U.; Yoon, J.; James, T.D. Fluorescent chemosensors: The past, present and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 7105–7123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Huang, X.; Meng, J.; Dong, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Zhu, C. Polymer-based fluorescence sensor incorporating triazole moieties for Hg2+ detection via click reaction. Polymer 2010, 51, 3064–3067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Giri, D.; Islam, S.N.; Patra, S.K. Synthesis and characterization of 1,2,3-triazole appended polythiophene based reusable fluorescent probe for the efficient detection of trace nitroaromatics. Polymer 2018, 134, 242–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xie, Z.; Kong, X.; Feng, L.; Ma, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Bao, W.; Shi, W.; Hui, Y. A novel highly selective probe with both aggregation-induced emission enhancement and intramolecular charge transfer characteristics for CN− detection. Sens. Actuators B 2018, 257, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Johansson, J.R.; Beke-Somfai, T.; Said Stålsmeden, A.; Kann, N. Ruthenium-Catalyzed Azide Alkyne Cycloaddition Reaction: Scope, Mechanism, and Applications. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Ghosh, D.; Rhodes, S.; Winder, D.; Atkinson, A.; Gibson, J.; Ming, W.; Padgett, C.; Landge, S.; Aiken, K. Spectroscopic investigation of bis-appended 1,2,3-triazole probe for the detection of Cu(II) ion. J. Mol. Struct. 2017, 1134, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lauko, J.; Kouwer, P.H.J.; Kasak, P.; Rowan, A.E. Tunable properties based on regioselectivity of 1,2,3-triazole units in axially chiral 2,2′-linked 1,1′-binaphthyl-based copolymers for ions and acid responsiveness. Eur. Polym. J. 2018, 108, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Park, S.Y.; Yoon, J.H.; Hong, C.S.; Souane, R.; Kim, J.S.; Matthews, S.E.; Vicens, J. A Pyrenyl-Appended Triazole-Based Calix[4]arene as a Fluorescent Sensor for Cd2+ and Zn2+. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8212–8218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Juwarker, H.; Lenhardt, J.M.; Pham, D.M.; Craig, S.L. 1,2,3-Triazole CH⋅⋅⋅Cl Contacts Guide Anion Binding and Concomitant Folding in 1,4-Diaryl Triazole Oligomers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3740–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Y.; Griend, D.A.V.; Flood, A.H. Modelling triazolophane–halide binding equilibria using Sivvu analysis of UV–vis titration data recorded under medium binding conditions. Supramol. Chem. 2009, 21, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Y.; Flood, A.H. Strong, Size-Selective, and Electronically Tunable C−H···Halide Binding with Steric Control over Aggregation from Synthetically Modular, Shape-Persistent [34]Triazolophanes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12111–12122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hein, J.E.; Fokin, V.V. Copper-catalyzed azide–alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) and beyond: New reactivity of copper(I) acetylides. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1302–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ghosh, D.; Rhodes, S.; Hawkins, K.; Winder, D.; Atkinson, A.; Ming, W.; Padgett, C.; Orvis, J.; Aiken, K.; Landge, S. A simple and effective 1,2,3-triazole based “turn-on” fluorescence sensor for the detection of anions. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Meisner, Q.J.; Accardo, J.V.; Hu, G.; Clark, R.J.; Jiang, D.-E.; Zhu, L. Fluorescence of Hydroxyphenyl-Substituted “Click” Triazoles. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 2956–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ghosh, D.; Landge, S.; Zhu, L.; Ofulue, U.; Akinsoji, O.A.; Govan, R.D.; Ugboya, A.; Hernandez, V.; Yates, K.; Henderson, A.; et al. The influence of amino substituents on the signal-output, selectivity, and sensitivity of a hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-triazolyl chemosensor for anions—A structure–property relationship investigation. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2020, e4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Landge, S.M.; Lazare, D.Y.; Freeman, C.; Bunn, J.; Cruz, J.I.; Winder, D.; Padgett, C.; Aiken, K.S.; Ghosh, D. Rationally designed phenanthrene derivatized triazole as a dual chemosensor for fluoride and copper recognition. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2020, 228, 117758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aiken, K.; Bunn, J.; Sutton, S.; Christianson, M.; Winder, D.; Freeman, C.; Padgett, C.; McMillen, C.; Ghosh, D.; Landge, S. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Investigations of Naphthalene-Based 1,2,3-Triazole Systems for Anion Sensing. Magnetochemistry 2018, 4, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Orita, R.; Franckevičius, M.; Vyšniauskas, A.; Gulbinas, V.; Sugiyama, H.; Uekusa, H.; Kanosue, K.; Ishige, R.; Ando, S. Enhanced fluorescence of phthalimide compounds induced by the incorporation of electron-donating alicyclic amino groups. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2018, 20, 16033–16044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sutradhar, T.; Misra, A. Role of Electron-Donating and Electron-Withdrawing Groups in Tuning the Optoelectronic Properties of Difluoroboron–Napthyridine Analogues. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 4111–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Abou-Hatab, S.; Spata, V.A.; Matsika, S. Substituent Effects on the Absorption and Fluorescence Properties of Anthracene. J. Phys. Chem. A 2017, 121, 1213–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Williams, R.T.; Bridges, J.W. Fluorescence of solutions: A review. J. Clin. Pathol. 1964, 17, 371–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Seely, G.R. Quenching of pyrochlorophyll fluorescence by nitro compounds. J. Phys. Chem. 1969, 73, 125–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Das, B.; Hossain, S.M.; Pakhira, B.; Pramanick, A.K.; Das, R.; Ray, M. Fluorescence quenching based detection of p-nitrophenol using luminescent silicon nanocrystals and insights into the quenching mechanism. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2020, 35, 035003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ooyama, Y.; Aoyama, S.; Furue, K.; Uenaka, K.; Ohshita, J. Fluorescence sensor for water based on PET (photo-induced electron transfer): Anthracene-bis(aminomethyl)phenylboronic acid ester. Dyes Pigm. 2015, 123, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ooyama, Y.; Uenaka, K.; Matsugasako, A.; Harima, Y.; Ohshita, J. Molecular design and synthesis of fluorescence PET (photo-induced electron transfer) sensors for detection of water in organic solvents. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 23255–23263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ooyama, Y.; Furue, K.; Uenaka, K.; Ohshita, J. Development of highly-sensitive fluorescence PET (photo-induced electron transfer) sensor for water: Anthracene–boronic acid ester. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 25330–25333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wu, T.-Y.; Chen, Y. Synthesis and characterization of luminescent copolymers containing iminodibenzyl and divinylbenzene chromophores. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2002, 40, 3847–3857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gao, W.; Yan, M.; Ge, S.; Liu, X.; Yu, J. Fluorescent sensor based on a novel conjugated polyfluorene derivative. Spectrochim. Acta Part A 2012, 95, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Swager, T.M. The Molecular Wire Approach to Sensory Signal Amplification. Acc. Chem. Res. 1998, 31, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Li, T.; Zhou, C.; Jiang, M. UV absorption spectra of polystyrene. Polym. Bull. 1991, 25, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koban, W.; Koch, J.D.; Hanson, R.K.; Schulz, C. Absorption and fluorescence of toluene vapor at elevated temperatures. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 2940–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Benesi, H.A.; Hildebrand, J.H. A Spectrophotometric Investigation of the Interaction of Iodine with Aromatic Hydrocarbons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1949, 71, 2703–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. 1,2,3-Triazoles via Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction.
Scheme 1. 1,2,3-Triazoles via Copper-Catalyzed Azide-Alkyne Cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction.
Sensors 20 02973 sch001
Scheme 2. The proposed binding mode of PTP and fluoride.
Scheme 2. The proposed binding mode of PTP and fluoride.
Sensors 20 02973 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of acrylamide monomer P03 and its copolymers.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of acrylamide monomer P03 and its copolymers.
Sensors 20 02973 sch003
Figure 1. Structures of PTP-based polymeric chemosensors.
Figure 1. Structures of PTP-based polymeric chemosensors.
Sensors 20 02973 g001
Figure 2. 1H NMR experiments with P01 and increasing equivalents of TBAF in deuterated acetonitrile (CD3CN).
Figure 2. 1H NMR experiments with P01 and increasing equivalents of TBAF in deuterated acetonitrile (CD3CN).
Sensors 20 02973 g002
Figure 3. Response of P07 (solvent: toluene) with P03 loadings of (A) 0.1 mol%, (B) 1.0 mol%, and (C) 10.0 mol% to TBA salts (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under UV light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P07 solution, 1:1.
Figure 3. Response of P07 (solvent: toluene) with P03 loadings of (A) 0.1 mol%, (B) 1.0 mol%, and (C) 10.0 mol% to TBA salts (Concentration of stock solution: 1.98 × 10−3 M, solvent: acetonitrile) under UV light (365 nm). Volume of anion solution: Volume of P07 solution, 1:1.
Sensors 20 02973 g003
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) treated with TBA salts (3.88 × 10−5 M, stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Figure 4. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) treated with TBA salts (3.88 × 10−5 M, stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Sensors 20 02973 g004
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) with TBAF (3.88 × 10−5 M, stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Figure 5. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1, 1.0, and 10.0 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) with TBAF (3.88 × 10−5 M, stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Sensors 20 02973 g005
Figure 6. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) treated with TBAF (stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Figure 6. Fluorescence spectra of P07 (0.1 mol% P03, solvent: toluene) treated with TBAF (stock solution solvent: acetonitrile). Excitation at 300 nm. Volume of P07 solution = 2.5 mL.
Sensors 20 02973 g006
Figure 7. Analysis of the P07-fluoride interaction with (A) a Benesi–Hildebrand plot and (B) a calibration curve.
Figure 7. Analysis of the P07-fluoride interaction with (A) a Benesi–Hildebrand plot and (B) a calibration curve.
Sensors 20 02973 g007

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ugboya, A.; Monroe, K.; Ofulue, U.; Yates, K.; Ghosh, D.; Landge, S.M.; Quirino, R.L.; Aiken, K.S. Exploring the Effects of Various Polymeric Backbones on the Performance of a Hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-Triazole Anion Sensor. Sensors 2020, 20, 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102973

AMA Style

Ugboya A, Monroe K, Ofulue U, Yates K, Ghosh D, Landge SM, Quirino RL, Aiken KS. Exploring the Effects of Various Polymeric Backbones on the Performance of a Hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-Triazole Anion Sensor. Sensors. 2020; 20(10):2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102973

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ugboya, Aikohi, Khristal Monroe, Unodinma Ofulue, Kayley Yates, Debanjana Ghosh, Shainaz M. Landge, Rafael Lopes Quirino, and Karelle S. Aiken. 2020. "Exploring the Effects of Various Polymeric Backbones on the Performance of a Hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-Triazole Anion Sensor" Sensors 20, no. 10: 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102973

APA Style

Ugboya, A., Monroe, K., Ofulue, U., Yates, K., Ghosh, D., Landge, S. M., Quirino, R. L., & Aiken, K. S. (2020). Exploring the Effects of Various Polymeric Backbones on the Performance of a Hydroxyaromatic 1,2,3-Triazole Anion Sensor. Sensors, 20(10), 2973. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20102973

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop