Figure 1.
Diagram of frame change detection activity.
Figure 1.
Diagram of frame change detection activity.
Figure 2.
Diagram of the difference method activity towards the static background.
Figure 2.
Diagram of the difference method activity towards the static background.
Figure 3.
Diagram of Method 1.1 activity.
Figure 3.
Diagram of Method 1.1 activity.
Figure 4.
Examples of Method 1.1 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 4.
Examples of Method 1.1 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 5.
Examples of Method 1.2. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 5.
Examples of Method 1.2. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 6.
Diagram of Method 1.2 activity.
Figure 6.
Diagram of Method 1.2 activity.
Figure 7.
Diagram of Method 1.3 activity.
Figure 7.
Diagram of Method 1.3 activity.
Figure 8.
Examples of Method 1.3 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 8.
Examples of Method 1.3 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 9.
Diagram of the difference method activity of the current frame towards the dynamic background.
Figure 9.
Diagram of the difference method activity of the current frame towards the dynamic background.
Figure 10.
Diagrams of Method 2.1 activity.
Figure 10.
Diagrams of Method 2.1 activity.
Figure 11.
Examples of Method 2.1. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 11.
Examples of Method 2.1. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 12.
Diagrams of Method 2.2 activity.
Figure 12.
Diagrams of Method 2.2 activity.
Figure 13.
Examples of Method 2.2 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 13.
Examples of Method 2.2 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 14.
Diagram of Method 2.3 activity—creation of the initial background.
Figure 14.
Diagram of Method 2.3 activity—creation of the initial background.
Figure 15.
Diagram of Method 2.3 activity—creation of a new background.
Figure 15.
Diagram of Method 2.3 activity—creation of a new background.
Figure 16.
Examples of Method 2.3 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 16.
Examples of Method 2.3 functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized difference in brightness between the currently checked frame and the background frame. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 17.
Diagram of optical flow method activity (Method 3).
Figure 17.
Diagram of optical flow method activity (Method 3).
Figure 18.
Examples of Method 3. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Map showing the velocity vector magnitude between the frames (dark blue = low velocity, red = high velocity) (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized map of velocity vector magnitude. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 18.
Examples of Method 3. functionality. (a) Background frame. (b) Map showing the velocity vector magnitude between the frames (dark blue = low velocity, red = high velocity) (c) Currently checked frame. (d) Binarized map of velocity vector magnitude. Findings that reach a value of logical 1 (white in the frame field) are considered potential findings of a detected person.
Figure 19.
Example of adjustment of objects found in the binary image by erosion filtering. Erosion filtering of objects by 3 pixels. (a) The original binary image of the findings after binarization of the difference finding. (b) Image (a) filtered by noise objects using erosion.
Figure 19.
Example of adjustment of objects found in the binary image by erosion filtering. Erosion filtering of objects by 3 pixels. (a) The original binary image of the findings after binarization of the difference finding. (b) Image (a) filtered by noise objects using erosion.
Figure 20.
Example of adjustment of objects found in the binary image by dilatation and reverse erosion of objects by a rectangular area of 20 × 20 pixels, both in the horizontal and vertical directions. (a) The result of the filtered finding dilatation. (b) The result of the reverse erosion of the binary image (a).
Figure 20.
Example of adjustment of objects found in the binary image by dilatation and reverse erosion of objects by a rectangular area of 20 × 20 pixels, both in the horizontal and vertical directions. (a) The result of the filtered finding dilatation. (b) The result of the reverse erosion of the binary image (a).
Figure 21.
Illustration describing the marking of the object found by a rectangular marking field.
Figure 21.
Illustration describing the marking of the object found by a rectangular marking field.
Figure 22.
Illustrations describing the unification of the intersecting objects found into the final object.
Figure 22.
Illustrations describing the unification of the intersecting objects found into the final object.
Figure 23.
Illustration of filtering of the objects found according to the dimensions of their rectangular delimitations described by a descriptive vector.
Figure 23.
Illustration of filtering of the objects found according to the dimensions of their rectangular delimitations described by a descriptive vector.
Figure 24.
Example of reducing the lifespan at an error finding. The illustration shows the real results of Method 1.1, with a lifespan of 1s, i.e., 4 frames at a frame rate of 4fps.
Figure 24.
Example of reducing the lifespan at an error finding. The illustration shows the real results of Method 1.1, with a lifespan of 1s, i.e., 4 frames at a frame rate of 4fps.
Figure 25.
Example of merging person findings. The illustration shows the real results of Method 1.1, with a lifespan of 1s, i.e., 4 frames at a frame rate of 4fps.
Figure 25.
Example of merging person findings. The illustration shows the real results of Method 1.1, with a lifespan of 1s, i.e., 4 frames at a frame rate of 4fps.
Figure 26.
Distribution of the individual criterion weights in the practical result of the video section.
Figure 26.
Distribution of the individual criterion weights in the practical result of the video section.
Figure 27.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 1 frame. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 27.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 1 frame. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 28.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 28.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 29.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 29.
Results of Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 30.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 1 frame. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 30.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 1 frame. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 31.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 31.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 32.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 32.
Results of Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 33.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 33.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 34.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 34.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 35.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 35.
Results of Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 36.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 36.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 37.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 37.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 38.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 38.
Results of Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 39.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 39.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 40.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 40.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 41.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 41.
Results of Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 42.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 42.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 43.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 43.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 44.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 44.
Results of Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 45.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 45.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 1 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 46.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 46.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 12 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 47.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Figure 47.
Results of Method 3 with a lifespan of 40 frames. (a) the weighted average rating with the average mean absolute error of the weighted rating and (b) boxplots of the distribution of the statistical sets of the results of the individual sections evaluated indicating: minimum, 1st quartile, median, 3rd quartile, maximum.
Table 1.
Table of currently detected findings in the scene of frame 43.
Table 1.
Table of currently detected findings in the scene of frame 43.
Lifespan Index | Number of Custom Pixels of the Person Found | Coordinates
Delimitation | Coordinates
Delimitation | Coordinates
Delimitation | Coordinates
Delimitation |
---|
4 | 4743 | 281 | 413 | 76 | 138 |
3 | 38,632 | 3 | 283 | 160 | 404 |
Table 2.
Description of test video analysis sections.
Table 2.
Description of test video analysis sections.
Video Section | Section Interval (Video Frames) | Actions in the Section |
---|
1 | 1 to 6 | empty room with no movement |
7 to 30 | door opening, entrance of person no.1, door closing |
2 | 31 to 40 | person no.1—walking across the room |
41 to 48 | person no.1—grabbing an object (a folder on the bed) |
3 | 49 to 70 | person no.1—sitting down, end of movement |
4 | 71 to 73 | person no.1—at rest |
74 to 84 | person no.1—at rest, door opening, entrance of person no.2 |
87 to 96 | person no.1—at rest, door opening, entrance of person no.2 |
5 | 97 to 134 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—shifting a chair and sitting down |
135 to 142 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest |
6 | 143 to 161 | person no.1—walking across the room, person no.2—at rest |
162 to 172 | person no.1—walking across the room, person no.2—at rest, |
intersecting of persons in the image |
173 to 188 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest, |
intersecting of persons in the image |
189 to 190 | person no.1—walking across the room, person no.2—at rest, |
intersecting of persons in the image |
7 | 191 to 215 | person no.1—walking across the room, person no.2—at rest |
216 to 229 | person no.1—pushing a toy car, person no.2—at rest |
230 to 239 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest |
8 | 240 to 268 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—walking across the room |
269 to 272 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest |
9 | 273 to 281 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest, |
darkening of the room using blinds |
282 to 296 | person no.1—at rest, person no.2—at rest, |
brightening of the room using blinds |
10 | 297 to 319 | person no.1—walking across the room (exit), person no.2—at rest |
11 | 320 to 339 | person no.2—walking across the room (exit) |
12 | 340 to 346 | door closing |
347 to 350 | empty room with no movement |
Table 3.
Saaty matrix with geometric means calculated, and standardized weights of the individual criteria.
Table 3.
Saaty matrix with geometric means calculated, and standardized weights of the individual criteria.
| | | | | | | |
---|
| 1 | 0.2 | 0.111 | 0.333 | 0.111 | 0.241 | 0.0351 |
| 5 | 1 | 0.166 | 3 | 1 | 1.200 | 0.1746 |
| 9 | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3.178 | 0.4626 |
| 3 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.699 | 0.1017 |
| 9 | 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1.552 | 0.2260 |
| 6.87 | 1 |
Table 4.
The results of the weighted person detection assessment using Method 1.1.
Table 4.
The results of the weighted person detection assessment using Method 1.1.
Section Number | Weighted Average Rating | The Mean Error of Measurement Rating |
---|
Lifespan of 1 Frame | Lifespan of 12 Frames | Lifespan of 40 Frames | Lifespan of 1 Frame | Lifespan of 12 Frames | Lifespan of 40 Frames |
---|
1 | 0.477 | 0.477 | 0.477 | 0.294 | 0.294 | 0.294 |
2 | 0.623 | 0.609 | 0.610 | 0.056 | 0.049 | 0.048 |
3 | 0.629 | 0.551 | 0.506 | 0.017 | 0.075 | 0.024 |
4 | 0.626 | 0.620 | 0.541 | 0.030 | 0.038 | 0.058 |
5 | 0.555 | 0.552 | 0.553 | 0.030 | 0.027 | 0.029 |
6 | 0.459 | 0.487 | 0.488 | 0.077 | 0.045 | 0.044 |
7 | 0.504 | 0.493 | 0.497 | 0.040 | 0.030 | 0.029 |
8 | 0.505 | 0.478 | 0.479 | 0.028 | 0.030 | 0.030 |
9 | 0.337 | 0.411 | 0.424 | 0.156 | 0.059 | 0.062 |
10 | 0.469 | 0.475 | 0.391 | 0.071 | 0.056 | 0.040 |
11 | 0.326 | 0.456 | 0.432 | 0.202 | 0.096 | 0.120 |
12 | 0.262 | 0.232 | 0.245 | 0.091 | 0.102 | 0.097 |
Average of rating of all sections | 0.481 | 0.487 | 0.470 | 0.091 | 0.075 | 0.073 |
Final ranking, from top-rated | 2 | 1 | 3 | | | |
Table 5.
Table of sorting the tested system configurations according to the average scaled rating in the test video sections, from top-rated.
Table 5.
Table of sorting the tested system configurations according to the average scaled rating in the test video sections, from top-rated.
System Configuration Used (Change Detection Method and Lifespan of Person Finding) | Result of the Weighted Rating— | Result of the Scaled Rating—Γ | Ranking of the Results According to the Average Scaled Rating in all Sections of the Test Video |
---|
Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.481 | 0.650 | 9 |
Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.487 | 0.780 | 2 |
Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.470 | 0.775 | 4 |
Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.473 | 0.622 | 13 |
Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.476 | 0.762 | 6 |
Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.460 | 0.747 | 7 |
Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.479 | 0.643 | 10 |
Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.485 | 0.772 | 5 |
Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.469 | 0.776 | 3 |
Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.400 | 0.215 | 20 |
Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.467 | 0.574 | 15 |
Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.438 | 0.639 | 11 |
Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.432 | 0.349 | 18 |
Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.468 | 0.715 | 8 |
Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.453 | 0.789 | 1 |
Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.412 | 0.278 | 19 |
Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.463 | 0.623 | 12 |
Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.424 | 0.552 | 16 |
Method 3 with a lifespan of 1 frame | 0.328 | -0.015 | 21 |
Method 3 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 0.437 | 0.539 | 17 |
Method 3 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 0.405 | 0.608 | 14 |
Table 6.
Table ranking the best results (A) Ranking of the results according to the average scaled rating in all sections of the video; (B) Ranking of the results according to the rankings in all sections of the video; (B) Ranking of the results according to the rankings in all sections of the video, except for the first and last section.
Table 6.
Table ranking the best results (A) Ranking of the results according to the average scaled rating in all sections of the video; (B) Ranking of the results according to the rankings in all sections of the video; (B) Ranking of the results according to the rankings in all sections of the video, except for the first and last section.
System Configuration Used | (A) | (B) | (C) |
---|
Method 1.1 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Method 1.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Method 2.2 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 1 | 4 | 3 |
Method 1.2 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 4 | 3 | 4 |
Method 2.3 with a lifespan of 12 frames | 6 | 5 | 5 |
Method 2.1 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 5 | 6 | 6 |
Method 3 with a lifespan of 40 frames | 7 | 7 | 7 |