Next Article in Journal
Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures Utilizing Novel Health Indicators Extracted from Complex Strain and Acoustic Emission Data
Next Article in Special Issue
The Use of Thermal Imaging in the Evaluation of Temperature Effects of Radiotherapy in Patients after Mastectomy—First Study
Previous Article in Journal
Improving Animal Monitoring Using Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) and Deep Learning Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Reconstruction of Microscopic Thermal Fields from Oversampled Infrared Images in Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion
 
 
Brief Report
Peer-Review Record

Measurement and Analysis of the Parameters of Modern Long-Range Thermal Imaging Cameras

Sensors 2021, 21(17), 5700; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175700
by Jaroslaw Barela, Krzysztof Firmanty and Mariusz Kastek *
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2021, 21(17), 5700; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175700
Submission received: 2 August 2021 / Revised: 12 August 2021 / Accepted: 18 August 2021 / Published: 24 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thermal Imaging Sensors and Their Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper presents the results of Measurement and analysis of the parameters of modern long range thermal imaging cameras. The topic is interesting and new. The introduction is poor, as it is focused only in the specific long range cameras, without showing the gap with the existing literature. The references are poor. Review papers on irt of Balaras, Nardi, Lucchi, and Tejedor are particularly useful to enrich this part. The structure of the paper is not clear. Figure 3 is very helpful for understanding the parameters used in irt. You wrote that only references 14-17 are able to do irt tests. Where do you find this information? Add these details. The discussion on parameters is well argumented. Thank n the contrary, the part on the results is not understandable at all. Explicate better the results, adding some sentences as the table and the graphics must be interpreted. Conclusion must be revised totally. English need a revision from a mothertongue.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

please see the attachment

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

English correction is needed

Back to TopTop