Next Article in Journal
Graph Attention Feature Fusion Network for ALS Point Cloud Classification
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Recruitments of Fundamental Muscle Synergies in the Trunk and Lower Limbs for Highly Variable Movements and Postures
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 21
Issue 18
10.3390/s21186190
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas

by
Andrzej Kulig
,
Mirosław Szyłak-Szydłowski
and
Marta Wiśniewska
*
Faculty of Building Services, Hydro and Environmental Engineering, Warsaw University of Technology, 20 Nowowiejska Street, 00-653 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(18), 6190; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186190
Submission received: 30 June 2021 / Revised: 4 September 2021 / Accepted: 13 September 2021 / Published: 15 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Portable Sensor Systems for Monitoring Environment and Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mineral excavation is a common process throughout the world. The open pits remaining after the closure of a mine require well-considered and meticulous reclamation activities aimed at restoring the environmental properties of a given area. The inspections carried out in Poland indicate numerous irregularities in implementing the reclamation process. The research in this study was conducted in six measurement series and includes both chemical and olfactometry determinations by devices: multisensor portable gas detector and field olfactometer. Statistical analysis of the results obtained show high concentrations in ambient air of both chemical compounds (NH3, VOCs, H2S, CH3SH) and odour, excluding the possibility of occurrence in the pit of only waste types contained in the administrative decision on reclamation. In addition to the unpleasant odour, the listed compounds can have dangerous effects on the health and life of living organisms. This paper presents a suitable method of control and detection of irregularities in the conducted processes. The main advantage is the relatively low cost of purchasing sensors and field olfactometers compared to other devices, and the possibility to test the polluted air in situ, without the risk of chemical processes occurring during transport of gas samples to the laboratory.

1. Introduction

The exploitation of natural aggregate deposits causes significant disruption of ecosystems. However, mining activities have become inevitable due to population growth and intensive industrial and technological development [1]. Adverse effects of human activities cause transformation of geological, hydrological, soil and relief conditions and reduced biodiversity. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [2], developed a few years ago by the United Nations (UN), include land management and restoration [3].
Reclamation work on disturbed areas is essential in preserving natural resources and maintaining sustainable use [4,5,6]. The direction of reclamation depends on many parameters such as the slope of the pit walls, permeability of the material for water and plant roots, the scale of erosion, soil type and its grain size, pH, existing fauna and flora species and historical and landscape values [7,8]. The most common direction for reclamation of pits is forestry and agriculture (cultivation, breeding) [7]. However, the reclamation of such areas may also take such directions as recreational (leisure and tourist, sports, cultural), water (recreational, economic, fishing, nature) and didactic (e.g., educational paths) [9,10,11].
The reclamation process consists in restoring a degraded site’s natural and amenity values. It is essential that reclamation activities do not have a negative impact on the environment. The reclamation involves levelling a larger area of land, sometimes in combination with a change of soil type. To fill in the excavation pit, i.e., to carry out the process of macrolevelling, materials compatible with recommendations for the reclamation of the given area are used, e.g., in the form of waste that does not adversely affect the environment of the given excavation pit and its surroundings, such as waste from construction, renovation and disassembly of buildings and road infrastructure (including soil from contaminated areas), byproducts of combustion processes or the final products of stabilization of biodegradable waste separated mechanically from the stream of mixed waste [12,13,14].
In Poland, about 40 types of minerals are mined using open-pit methods, which include mainly sands, gravels, clays, building stone and road construction, limestone and brown coal [15]. In accordance with the law in force in Poland, owners of post-mining excavations are obliged to carry out the reclamation (recultivation/rehabilitation) of the excavated pit, i.e., to restore the natural and functional values of the environment [7,16,17].
In the European Union countries, the land owner is obliged to correctly reclaim the post-mining land following the administrative decision issued. The inspections carried out in Poland by the Supreme Chamber of Control indicate numerous irregularities in implementing the reclamation process. An overall process is backfilling of waste of various origins in excavations, including municipal and hazardous waste [18].
The compounds characteristic for organic matter decomposition processes occurring at municipal waste management plants (mechanical–biological waste treatment plants (MBTP), municipal waste biogas plants (MWBP) and landfills) include mainly alkanes, alkenes, ketones, terpenes and a broad spectrum of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [19,20,21,22,23]. Some of these substances are formed by decomposition processes of sulphur- and nitrogen-containing compounds. Many are characterized by unpleasant odour [24]. Chemical compounds that produce an olfactory sensation are called odorants [25].
Globally, nearly 70% of the waste generated is disposed in landfills [26,27]. Since the introduction of the Landfill Directive by the European Union in 1999, there has been a yearly reduction of biodegradable waste going to landfills in the member states, which translates into a decrease in odorant emissions from landfills [28,29].
Municipal waste landfills, in contrast to hazardous waste landfills, are well recognized in the literature in terms of the processes occurring in the deposited waste and process gas emissions. The latter are mainly related to the decomposition of organic matter in the deposited waste [30]. Landfill gas consists mainly of methane (CH4, 50–60%), carbon dioxide (CO2, 40–50%), but also, as demonstrated by Young and Parker [31], hundreds of various chemical compounds present in trace amounts, the so-called trace gases (1%). Landfill trace gases can be divided into organic and inorganic sulphur compounds, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes, esters and ethers, acetates and acids, furans, volatile fatty acids (VFAs), aromatic hydrocarbons (aromatic compounds containing one or more benzene rings), halogenated compounds (compounds containing F, Cl or Br), terpenes (a subgroup of hydrocarbons with five carbon atoms) and nitrogen-containing compounds including ammonia [32,33,34,35]. Many of these compounds, in addition to their unpleasant odour, are also harmful to the health of living organisms, and to the environment.
There are many methods for the quantitative analysis of emitted process gases, including the quantitative analysis of odour. These methods can be generally divided into laboratory methods, which require sampling a gas using a unique bag and its determination under laboratory conditions, and field methods. Both the sampling and its resolution are performed at the source (in the field) [36,37].
Field methods allow collection of a larger number of gas samples and the results are obtained immediately, and therefore not subject to the risk of chemical reactions occurring in the sample during transport time to the laboratory [38,39]. For the quantification of specific compounds, portable gas detectors equipped with sensors are very often used, which are dictated by relatively low investment costs compared to other types of devices and uncomplicated operation [40]. Chemical sensors are used for environmental studies and they are also applied to visualize fruit crop quality indicators [41]. Comparing high-capacity gas detectors with gas chromatographs, the latter are much more extensive devices, requiring longer response times [42,43]. The sensor types available on the market differ mainly in their operating principle, sensitivity, detection range, response time, gas flow rate and sensitivity to temperature and relative air humidity [44].
In the literature, one can find, among others, descriptions of various types of chemical sensors, such as photoionization detectors (PID), flame photometric detectors (FPD) and far UV absorbance detectors (FUV), used mainly in gas chromatography, and electrochemical detectors (EC) (potentiometric—measurement of voltage, amperometric—measurement of current and conductometric—measurement of conductivity) [45,46].
Olfactometers are used to quantify odour. Dynamic laboratory olfactometry is a standardized method (European Standard EN 13725:2003 Air Quality—Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry [47]) in contrast to field olfactometry. Odour measurements carried out with olfactometers of St Croix Sensory Inc., Olfasense or Scentroid, meet the requirements of the European Standard [47] in terms of odour measurement approach based on the YES (odour is perceptible)/NO (odour is not detectable) method [48,49].
The application of chemical sensors and sensory methods enable monitoring technological processes in waste management plants, demonstrated in [20,50]. This research aims to verify whether chemical air quality tests can, together with olfactometric analyses, have practical application in ecological audits of the areas. Moreover, an attempt was made to check the applicability of the sensor method as a tool for detecting irregularities in the recultivation carried out, including macrolevelling of post-mining excavations. Furthermore, consequently, to check whether olfactometric testing (with particular emphasis on in situ testing) in combination with sensory, field chemical analysis provide an appropriate, adequate technique for monitoring of some results, including accurate land reclamation results.
The novel contribution of the present research is the combination of field olfactometry with field studies of chemical compounds using electronic sensors to assess the condition of a site after reclamation. These tests, supplementing the classical determinations of soil and groundwater pollutants concentrations in degraded areas, allow for complex analysis of the state of the environment and undesired emission of compounds, treating this emission holistically and considering odour–odorant relations. These methods allow for a larger number of samples than laboratory methods. In addition, results are obtained immediately, and sampling points can be adapted to current results. The last of these aspects is particularly important in the case of a heterogeneous object such as the landfill studied, where the locations of odorogenic compound emissions were unpredictable and their location could not be determined a priori. Only the results obtained in real-time allowed for locating some of the significant odour sources. This complementary approach of field studies is a novelty in assessing the effects of remediation of degraded sites.

2. Materials and Methods

The tests were carried out in the eastern part of the Masovian Voivodeship in the area of the excavation (former gravel pit), which was filled with waste and covered with a layer of soil. Materials that could be used legally to fill in the excavation included, among others, waste from mining of minerals other than metal ores, waste sands and clays, solid sediments from beet cleaning and washing, concrete waste and brick rubble from demolition and repair works.
Chemical tests, including the determination of odorant concentrations of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), ammonia (NH3), hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and methanethiol (CH3SH), which are the characteristic compounds, for the processes of decomposition of organic matter, were performed with a MultiRae Pro gas detector (RAE Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). In addition, the percentage of methane (CH4) was determined using a MultiRae Lite gas detector (RAE Systems, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). At each of the measurement points, measurements of the analyzed compounds were repeated five times. The characteristics of the substances determined are presented in Table 1.
Olfactometric studies were performed using portable field olfactometers of the Nasal Ranger® and Scentroid SM-100 types. They allow the creation of calibrated dilution series by mixing odorant-contaminated air with filtered, odorant-free air. Field odour nuisance testing using field olfactometers is a method of quantifying odour concentrations in dilution-to-threshold ratios (D/T). The D/T value is the number of dilutions required to achieve a dilution in the ambient air that the odour is undetectable. Owing to the application of these olfactometers, it is possible to calculate the D/T value and, on its basis, the odour concentration value, determined as cod in odour units (ou—odour unit, analogically to the European standard [46]) per volume unit [ou/m3] [36]. Temperature (T, °C) and relative humidity (RH, %) were measured using a Rotronic HydroPalm psychrometer with HygroClip2 HC2-S3 sensor. Measurements were conducted at the height of 1.5 m.
One-way ANOVA was used for statistical tests and the Games–Howell post hoc test was used to determine which series were statistically significantly different. This test is used to compare all possible combinations of group differences when the assumption of homogeneity of variances is violated. The Games–Howell method is an improved version of the Tukey–Kramer method and is applicable in cases where the equivalence of variance assumption is violated. It is a t-test using Welch’s degree of freedom. This method uses a strategy for controlling the type I error for the entire comparison and is known to maintain the preset significance level even when the sample size differs [51]. Classical regression generalized linear model with Gaussian distribution was performed.
The research in this study was conducted in six measurement series between January and August 2020, including one pilot series. The schedule of the measurement series carried out is shown in Table 2.
The first series of measurements (with 17 receptor points) was of a pilot character and included reconnaissance of the studied area, the preliminary determination of odour emission sources and identification of discolourations and cracks in the top layer of the reclamation cover. Figure 1 contains photographs of individual, characteristic sites located in the study area.
During the pilot studies, it was found that the temperature of gases emerging from cracks in the ground was as much as 20 °C greater than the temperature of the ambient atmospheric air. It depended on the location and size of the fissure in the surface of the reclaimed excavation. A static nonventilated hood was used for sampling in this series to take the escaping gases directly from the fissures, minimizing the influence of external conditions on the content of the analysed compounds. Another five series were performed at 75 points as spatial distributions of concentrations in ambient air (without the use of a static hood).

3. Results and Discussion

The statistical analysis, which is presented later in this paper, shows that the most representative spatial distribution of H2S was observed in series 2, due to the strongest correlation with odour concentration This distribution is shown in Figure 2. Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6 show the results of odorant and odour concentrations. The measurement results of methane are not presented, since every determination was below the quantification threshold, which may indicate that the source of gas emissions is not typical municipal waste; methane in biogas emitted from municipal landfills usually represents between 50% and 60% of the mixture [29,30].
The results obtained in this study were visualized using Esri ArcMap software and analyzed statistically by StatSoft Statistica 13.1 and R 4.1.0 software. Descriptive statistics of the results achieved in all measurement series are presented in Table 3, while Figure 3 contains boxplots of compound concentrations.
In the first series of tests, we found much lower ammonia concentrations than in the other series; a similar relationship was observed for mercaptans and VOCs. In the latter case, maxima were marked in series 2, 3 and 4, while in series 5 the value of VOCs concentration decreased. This may indicate a reduced intensification of odorogenic compounds during the decomposition of the deposited waste. This emission was strongest in series 2, 3 and 4 of the study. Therefore, these results prove that there is a valid reason to believe that the pit was not filled correctly, because, especially in series 2–4, there was a strong emission of odorogenic compounds in health-threatening concentrations.
The high concentrations of the compounds tested may indicate differences between the designed and actual macronutrients. Considering the test results obtained, the types of waste deposited in the pit do not meet the criteria for waste that can be subjected to the landfilling process [28]. The results of odorant concentrations may indicate the occurrence of thermal processes as well as chemical and biological reactions. The release of gases from volatile compounds contained in the deposited waste occurs due to increased temperature [52,53]. The question of the types of waste deposited in the pit is very difficult to resolve. The visible dark colour and cracks on the surface of the investigated area (Figure 1) may be a result of the precipitation reaction of some heavy metals such as lead, mercury, copper, iron, nickel and cobalt in reaction with hydrogen sulphide, which was detected in significant amounts during the conducted studies [54,55,56,57]. The presence of sulphides of these metals may indicate the medical origin of the waste. Toxic compounds present in these wastes pose a significant threat to groundwater and neighbouring drinking water intakes due to the possibility of their infiltration and migration [58].
High concentrations of ammonia and sulphur compounds recorded during the study are also characteristic, e.g., decomposition of organic matter contained in municipal waste disposed in landfills. The decomposition of the organic fraction by microorganisms is cited as the main cause of odour emissions from landfills [59]. For this type of waste, parameters such as C/N ratio, temperature, moisture content and pH can influence the ammonia concentration [20,60,61]. When analyzing the concentrations of volatile sulphur compounds, their level may be determined mainly by the temperature and oxygen concentration [60,62]. In addition, as stated by Bruno et al. [63] and Toledo et al. [64], odour emissions associated with waste treatment odours generated also depend on the type of raw material, the stage of decomposition, and the microclimatic conditions at the treatment site [65].
The literature review indicates that it is difficult to make an unambiguous division when examining proper and improper reclamation filling of an excavation. One of the most important indicators of properly performed rehabilitation of the pits in the research conducted is the nonpollution of the surrounding environment [66]. However, it is generally accepted that properly carried out reclamation should lead to the maintenance of air quality parameters at the background level, i.e., the same as in the surrounding reclaimed area. This means that the area of the former excavation, following reclamation, should not be a source of pollutant emissions to the atmosphere. In the analyzed case, the source of the emission of substances is listed in Table 1. The compounds investigated in the present work are included in such pollutants. Their limit values vary among countries [67]. In Austria, for example, permissible odour concentration levels are regulated through guidelines without legal significance. A concentration of 1 ou/m3 is defined as weak odour intensity and a relationship of 1 ou/m3 < cod < 8 ou/m3 is defined as strong odour intensity [68]. In the case of hydrogen sulphide, there is a low olfactory detection threshold (OT), for example, 0.0081 ppm according to [69]. As it increases, it causes a strong and unpleasant odour. Irritation and nausea are expected at concentrations above 10 ppm, and respiratory and eye damage is expected at concentrations above 50 ppm. In the 300 to 500 ppm range, exposure to H2S can be life threatening, and concentrations above 700 ppm are fatal [70,71]. For ammonia, the OT according to [72] is 5.2 ppm. According to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the maximum permissible time-weighted average (TWA) exposure to anhydrous ammonia for an 8-h workday in a 40-h week is 25 ppm. The short-term exposure limit (STEL), or the concentration at which exposure lasting more than 15 min is potentially hazardous, is 35 ppm. The concentration at which the gas is immediately harmful to life or health (IDLH) is 500 ppm [73,74]. Methyl mercaptan, like hydrogen sulphide, is a volatile sulphur compound (VSC). Compared to H2S, it has a much lower OT, 0.00393 ppm, according to [69], but it does not show such harmful effects on the health of living organisms. The situation is much more difficult to interpret in the case of VOCs, which cover a wide range of compounds having carbon in their structure. In the case of studies carried out in biogas plants processing municipal waste, during which besides olfactometry and detector also gas chromatography was used [20], the dominating VOCs were the compounds styrene (OT = 0.047 ppm [75]), phenol (OT = 0.048 ppm [76]) and toluene (OT = 0.33 ppm [77]), which, apart from unpleasant odour, are also characterized by a dangerous effect on human health and life. Analyzing the results presented and the characteristics of the compounds, it can be concluded that the recultivation activities carried out on the site do not comply with the decision issued by the state authority or with the definition of recultivation. The recorded concentrations of odour and chemical compounds cause direct danger to vegetation but are mainly a significant odour nuisance and an indirect threat to the health of living organisms, which is particularly important in the case of nearby settlements and animal habitats. The boxplots in Figure 3 indicate potentially significant differences in ammonium nitrogen concentration between the first time points and subsequent time points in the series. Therefore, one-way ANOVA test was used to determine if these differences were statistically significant (Table 4).
In the case of cod and H2S concentration, F-statistic is less than 1, which may indicate that within-group variance is greater than the between-group variance. In this case, it could be a lack of the effect (furthermore, p-value is significant, almost 1.0). The desired significance level of less than 0.05 is usually obtained only when the F statistic is at least equal to or greater than two. This case occurs with NH3 and VOCs, and the p-values are <0.001 and 0.004, respectively. Therefore, one-way ANOVA test was to determine whether there are any statistically significant differences between the means of groups. There is a statistically significant difference between the means of ammonium nitrogen concentration results, so post hoc tests were made (Table 5).
Based on the results of the Games–Howell post hoc test, statistically significant differences were found between the ammonia concentration results determined in the first series and the concentration results in the other series. These results between series 2–5 are not significantly different. Pearson’s correlation matrix among the different analytes for all times series is presented in Table 6.
Upper and lower confidence intervals are constructed so that the designated proportion (confidence level) of these intervals will include the true population value; 95% CI Upper is defined by a limit above the estimated parameter value (0.95), while 95% CI Lower defined by a limit above the estimated parameter value. All correlation results between the tested values are statistically significant (p < 0.001). The strongest correlation, with a correlation coefficient value of 0.864, was noted between hydrogen sulphide and odour concentrations. A strong correlation was also noted between hydrogen sulphide concentration and VOCs concentration.
The sensor method used in this study can be compared with the aspiration method (analytical, colorimetric method), which involves extracting specific contaminants when air is passed through a selective filter. The sampling time is related to the concentration averaging time, while the analysis time depends mainly on the type of contaminant and can be up to several hours. Measurement results are averaged over the sampling time, making it impossible to obtain concentration values for very short time intervals, such as a few seconds. The analysis is limited to single chemical compounds whose concentrations in the test gas do not necessarily translate into actual odorous air quality. The results of odorant concentrations may be affected by errors resulting from the operation of particular elements of aspirators (e.g., flow meter), inaccurate pouring of absorbing solutions, preparation of samples for comparison with standards and variable perception of the eye of the person performing the analysis. This method is more appropriate for low gas concentrations (<2 ppm) due to the need to prepare a suitable scale of standards [78]. Based on the experience gained by the authors’ team during aspiration and sensor tests on another site, the results of which have not yet been published, significant differences in the magnitude of the results obtained were found. At high concentrations, up to twice the concentration of the aspiration method was obtained with the sensor method, while at low concentrations the differences between measurements were only about 5%.

4. Conclusions

Mineral excavation is common process throughout the world. The open pits remaining after the closure of a mine require well-considered and meticulous reclamation activities aimed at restoring the environmental properties of a given area. In the case of recultivation based on macronivelation, i.e., filling the excavation with specific types of waste, undesired actions harmful to the environment often occur. Lack of adequate supervision during reclamation may result, among others, in uncontrolled emission of odorous and toxic substances.
The research carried out in this study using sensors and olfactometric methods indicates irregularities connected with the way the area was recultivated. High concentrations in ambient air of both chemical compounds (NH3, VOCs, H2S and CH3SH) and odour exclude the possibility of occurrence in the pit of only the types of waste contained in the administrative decision on reclamation. In addition to the unpleasant odour, the compounds listed, especially NH3 and H2S, but also many types of VOCs, can have dangerous effects on the health and life of living organisms.
The dark colour of the soil and the crevices from which they emit odorous compounds, which may indicate the presence of heavy metal sulphides, are cause for concern. However, the main problem is the lack of knowledge concerning the origin of the waste deposited in the pit and its possible adverse ecological effects.
The statistical analysis of the results obtained indicates a strong correlation between the odorants and odour concentration. The highest correlation was observed between H2S and cod concentrations.
Although the methods presented in this paper cannot give an unambiguous answer as to the types of waste used in the process of reclamation of excavations or information on all compounds emitted from them, they are an appropriate method for detecting and monitoring irregularities in the processes conducted, resulting from the observation that a properly rehabilitated area is not a source of high odorant and odour concentrations. In summary, the study confirmed that olfactometric field tests combined with chemical sensor analysis, is an appropriate and adequate technique for monitoring some results, including accuracy of land recultivation results. The main advantage is the relatively low cost of purchasing sensors and field olfactometers compared to devices such as gas chromatographs, but also the possibility to test the polluted air in situ, without the risk of chemical processes occurring during the transport of gas samples to the laboratory.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K., M.S.-S. and M.W.; methodology, A.K., M.W. and M.S.-S.; investigation, A.K., M.S.-S. and M.W.; data curation, M.S.-S. and M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S.-S. and M.W.; writing—review and editing, A.K.; visualization, M.S.-S.; supervision, A.K.; project administration, A.K.; funding acquisition, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Warsaw University of Technology.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data available on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Similä, J.; Jokinen, M. Governing conflicts between mining and tourism in the Arctic. Arct. Rev. Law Politics 2018, 9, 148–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. United Nations. Transforming or World. The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; A/RES/70/1; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. Keesstra, S.D.; Bouma, J.; Wallinga, J.; Tittonell, P.; Smith, P.; Cerdà, A.; Montanarella, L.; Quinton, J.N.; Pachepsky, Y.; van der Putten, W.H.; et al. The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Soil 2016, 2, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zhenqi, H.; Peijun, W.; Jing, L. Ecological restoration of abandoned mine land in China. J. Resour. Ecol. 2012, 3, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Biały, W.; Mroczkowska, P. Influence of coal waste heaps on water environment in Upper Silesian borderland areas—Case study. In Proceedings of the 15th SGEM GeoConference on Science and Technologies, Albena, Bulgaria, 18–24 June 2015; pp. 675–682, ISBN 978-619-7105-33-9. [Google Scholar]
  6. Siuta, J.; Dylewski, J.; Żukowski, B. Reclamation and development of post-mining lands in Poland. J. Min. Geoengin. 2012, 36, 5–7. [Google Scholar]
  7. Mazur-Belzyt, K. Re-thinking Post-Mining Areas Reclamation in 21st Century. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2019, 471, 102055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pactwa, K.; Woźniak, J.; Dudek, M. Coal mining waste in Poland in reference to circular economy principles. Fuel 2020, 270, 117493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chuman, T. Restoration practices used on post mining sites and industrial deposits in the Czech Republic with an example of natural restoration of granodiorite quarries and spoil heaps. J. Landsc. Ecol. 2015, 8, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Kabrna, M. Studies of land restoration on spoil heaps from brown coal mining in the Czech Republic—A literature review. J. Lands. Stud. 2011, 4, 59–69. [Google Scholar]
  11. Prach, K.; Šebelíkov´a, L.; Řehounkov´a, K.; del Moral, R. Possibilities and limitations of passive restoration of heavily disturbed sites. Landsc. Res. 2019, 45, 247–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sekba, D.U.G.; Acar, C. Determining usages in post-mining sites according to landscape design approaches. Land Degrad Dev. 2021, 32, 2661–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Konovalov, V.E.; Semyachkov, A.I.; Pochechun, V.A. Concept of mining landscape rehabilitation. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018, 451, 012208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wiśniewska, M.; Lelicińska-Serafin, K. The Role and Effectiveness of the MBT Installation in Poland Based on Selected Examples. Civ. Environ. Eng. Rep. 2019, 29, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kwiatkowska-Malina, J.; Wyszomierska, M. Redevelopment of natural aggregates post-mining areas: The SITNO deposit—Case study. Infrastruct. Ecol. Rural Areas 2014, 2, 705–717. [Google Scholar]
  16. Biały, W.; Moni, V. Rehabilitation of Post-Mining Areas in the Bohumin City Area (Czech Republic). Case Study. New Trends Prod. Eng. 2020, 3, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hendrychov’a, M.; Svobodova, K.; Kabrna, M. Mine reclamation planning and management: Integrating natural habitats into post-mining land use. Resour. Policy 2020, 69, 101882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Supreme Audit Office. Land Reclamation after Exploitation of the Minerals Covered by Ownership of Land; Information on the Results of the Audit; Supreme Audit Office: Warsaw, Poland, 2018.
  19. Colón, J.; Alvarez, C.; Vinot, M.; Lafuente, F.J.; Ponsá, S.; Sánchez, A.; Gabriel, D. Characterization of odorous compounds and odor load in indoor air of modern complex MBT facilities. Characterization of odorous compounds and odor load in indoor air of modern complex MBT facilities. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 313, 1311–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Wiśniewska, M.; Kulig, A.; Lelicińska-Serafin, K. The Use of Chemical Sensors to Monitor Odour Emissions at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Duan, Z.; Kjeldsen, P.; Scheutz, C. Trace gas composition in landfill gas at Danish landfills receiving low-organic waste. Waste Manag. 2021, 122, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Smet, E.; Van Langenhove, H.; De Bo, I. The emission of volatile compounds during the aerobic and the combined anaerobic aerobic composting of biowaste. Atmos. Environ. 1999, 33, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Staley, B.F.; Xu, F.; Cowie, S.J.; Barlaz, M.A.; Hater, G.R. Release of trace organic compounds during the decomposition of municipal solid waste components. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5984–5991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Domingo, J.L.; Nadal, M. Domestic waste composting facilities: A review of human health risks. Environ. Int. 2009, 35, 382–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wiśniewska, M.; Kulig, A.; Lelicińska-Serafin, K. The Impact of Technological Processes on Odorant Emissions at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fischedick, M.; Roy, J.; Abdel-Aziz, A.; Acquaye, A.; Allwood, J.; Ceron, J.-P.; Geng, Y.; Kheshgi, H.; Lanza, A.; Perczyk, D.; et al. Industry. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014; Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyb, K., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kaza, S.; Yao, L.C.; Bhada-Tata, P.; Van Woerden, F. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  28. European Environment Agency. Municipal Waste Management across European Countries. 2016. Available online: https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/waste/municipal-waste/municipal-waste-management-acrosseuropean-countries (accessed on 18 June 2020).
  29. Pawlowska, M.; Czerwinski, J.; Stepniewski, W. Variability of the nonmethane volatile organic compounds (NMVOC) composition in biogas from sorted and unsorted landfill material. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2008, 34, 287–298. [Google Scholar]
  30. Duan, Z.; Scheutz, C.; Kjeldsen, P. Trace gas emissions from municipal solid waste landfills: A review. Waste Manag. 2021, 119, 39–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Young, P.J.; Parker, A. The identification and possible environmental impact of trace gases and vapours in landfill gas. Waste Manag. Res. 1983, 1, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dincer, F.; Odabasi, M.; Muezzinoglu, A. Chemical characterization of odorous gases at a landfill site by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2006, 1122, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Keller, A.P. Trace Constituents in Landfill Gas. Task Report on Inventory and Assessment of Cleaning Technologies; Final Report, May 1984–February 1987; Energy Research Corporation: Danbury, CT, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  34. Komilis, D.P.; Ham, R.K.; Park, J.K. Emission of volatile organic compounds during composting of municipal solid wastes. Water Res. 2004, 38, 1707–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Parker, T.; Dottridge, J.; Kelly, S. Investigation of the Composition and Emissions of Trace Components in Landfill Gas; R&D Technical Report P1–438/TR; Environment Agency: Bristol, UK, 2002.
  36. Wiśniewska, M.; Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. The Air and Sewage Pollutants from Biological Waste Treatment. Processes 2021, 9, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kulig, A.; Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. Assessment of the Effects of Wastewater Treatment Plant Modernization by Means of the Field Olfactometry Method. Water 2019, 11, 2367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Wiśniewska, M. Methods of Assessing Odour Emissions from Biogas Plants Processing Municipal Waste. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. Odour Samples Degradation during Detention in Tedlar® Bags. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Szulczyński, B.; Gębicki, J. Currently commercially available chemical sensors employed for detection of volatile organic compounds in outdoor and indoor air. Environments 2017, 4, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Wilson, D. Chemical Sensors for Farm-to-Table Monitoring of Fruit Quality. Sensors 2021, 21, 1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sanchez, J.B.; Schmitt, A.; Berger, F.; Mavon, C. Silicon-micromachined gas chromatographic columns for the development of portable detection device. J. Sens. 2010, 2010, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Malcolm, A.; Wright, S.; Syms, R.R.A.; Dash, N.; Schwab, M.A.; Finlay, A. Miniature mass spectrometer system based on a microengineered quadrupole filter. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 1751–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hübert, T.; Boon-Brett, L.; Black, G.; Banach, U. Hydrogen sensors—A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 329–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ho, C.K.; Itamura, M.T.; Kelley, M.; Hughes, R.C. Review of Chemical Sensors for In-Situ Monitoring of Volatile Contaminants; Sandia National Laboratories: Albuquerque, NM, USA, 2001.
  46. Spinelle, L.; Gerboles, M.; Kok, G.; Persijn, S.; Sauerwald, T. Review of Portable and Low-Cost Sensors for the Ambient Air Monitoring of Benzene and Other Volatile Organic Compounds. Sensors 2017, 17, 1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. CEN. Air Quality—Determination of Odour Concentration by Dynamic Olfactometry; Standard EN 13725: 2003; CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  48. Maurer, D.L.; Bragdon, A.M.; Short, B.C.; Ahn, H.; Koziel, J.A. Improving environmental odor measurements: Comparison of lab-based standard method and portable odor measurement technology. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2018, 44, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Szyłak-Szydłowski, M. Comparison of two types of field olfactometers for assessing odours in laboratory and field tests. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2014, 40, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wiśniewska, M.; Kulig, A.; Lelicińska-Serafin, K. Olfactometric testing as a method for assessing odour nuisance of biogas plants processing municipal waste. Arch. Environ. Prot. 2020, 46, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, C.; Cao, K.; Valaulikar, R.; Fu, X.; Sorin, A.B. Variability of Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOC) in the indoor air of retail stores. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sangseok, L.; Dong, K.L. What is the proper way to apply the multiple comparison test? Korean J. Anesthesiol. 2018, 71, 353–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Demirel, B.; Scherer, P. The roles of acetotrophic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens during anaerobic conversion of biomass to methane: A review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 2008, 7, 173–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gupta, V.K.; Gupta, M.; Sharma, S. Process development for the removal of lead and chromium from aqueous solutions using red mud-an aluminum industry waste. Water Res. 2001, 35, 1125–1134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Montanaro, L.; Bianchini, N.; Rincon, J.M.; Romero, M. Sintering behaviour of pressed red mud wastes from zinc hydrometallurgy. Ceram. Int. 2001, 27, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rashchi, F.; Dashti, A.; Arabpour-Yazdi, M.; Abdizadeh, A. Anglesite flotation: A study for lead recovery from zinc leach residue. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moors, E.H.M.; Dijkema, G.P.J. Embedded industrial production systems: Lessons from waste management in zinc production. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73, 250–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kaur, H.; Siddique, R.; Rajor, A. Removal of alkalinity and metal toxicity from incinerated biomedical waste ash by using Bacillus halodurans. Bioremediation J. 2021, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pierucci, P.; Porazzi, E.; Martinez, M.P.; Adani, F.; Carati, C.; Rubino, F.M.; Colombi, A.; Calcaterra, E.; Benfenati, E. Volatile organic compounds produced during the aerobic biological processing of municipal solid waste in a pilot plant. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Moreno, A.I.; Arnáiz, N.; Font, R.; Carratalá, A. Chemical characterization of emissions from a municipal solid waste treatment plant. Waste Manag. 2014, 34, 2393–2399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pagans, E.; Barrena, R.; Font, X.; Sánchez, A. Ammonia emissions from the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process temperature. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 1534–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Higgins, M.J.; Chen, Y.-C.; Yarosz, D.P.; Murthy, S.N.; Maas, N.A.; Glindemann, D.; Novak, J.T. Cycling of volatile organic sulfur compounds in anaerobically digested biosolids and its implications for odors. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Bruno, P.; Caselli, M.; De Gennaro, G.; Solito, M.; Tutino, M. Monitoring of odor compounds produced by solid waste treatment plants with diffusive samplers. Waste Manag. 2007, 27, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Toledo, M.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Siles, J.A.; Martin, M.A. Full-scale composting of sewage sludge and market waste: Stability monitoring and odor dispersion modelling. Environ. Res. 2018, 167, 739–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wiśniewska, M.; Kulig, A.; Lelicińska-Serafin, K. The Importance of the Microclimatic Conditions Inside and Outside of Plant Buildings in Odorants Emission at Municipal Waste Biogas Installations. Energies 2020, 13, 6463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Australian Government. Mine Rehabilitation. Leading Practice Sustainable Development Program for Mining Industry; Australian Government: Canberra, Australia, 2016.
  67. Bokowa, A.; Diaz, C.; Koziel, J.A.; McGinley, M.; Barclay, J.; Schauberger, G.; Guillot, J.M.; Sneath, R.; Capelli, L.; Zorich, V.; et al. Summary and Overview of the Odour Regulations Worldwide. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. ÖAW. Umweltwissenschaftliche Grundlagen und Zielsetzungen im Rahmen des Nationalen Umweltplans für die Bereiche Klima, Luft, Geruch und Lärm; Schriftenreihe der Sektion I. Band, 17; Kommissionfür Reinhaltung der Luft der Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Ed.; Bundesministeriums für Umwelt, Jugend und Familie: Vienna, Austria, 1994; Volume 17. [Google Scholar]
  69. Amoore, J.E.; Hautala, E. Odour as an aid to chemical safety: Odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1983, 3, 272–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. U.S. National Research Council, Division of Medical Sciences. Hydrogen Sulfide; Health Effects Research Laboratory: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA, 1978.
  71. American Society of Civil Engineers. Environmental Engineering Division Sulfide in Wastewater Collection and Treatment Systems; 536; American Society of Civil Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 1989; ISBN 978-0-87262-681-2. [Google Scholar]
  72. Helmers, S.; Top, F.H.; Knapp, L.W. Ammonia injuries in agriculture. J. Iowa Med. Soc. 1971, 61, 271–280. [Google Scholar]
  73. John, F.; Finklea, M.D. NIOSH recommended standards for occupational exposure to ammonia and benzene. Int. J. Occup. Health Saf. 1974, 43, 32–33. [Google Scholar]
  74. Padappayil, R.P.; Borger, J. Ammonia toxicity. In StatPearls; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  75. Leonardos, G.; Kendall, D.; Barnard, N. Odor threshold determinations of 53 odorant chemicals. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 1969, 19, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. DHHS. Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Phenol; DHHS (NIOSH) Publication: Spokane, WA, USA, 1976; pp. 76–196.
  77. Gebicki, J.; Dymerski, T.; Namieśnik, J. Investigation of air quality beside a municipal landfill: The fate of malodour compounds as a model VOC. Environments 2017, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Kulig, A.; Ossowska-Cypryk, K.; Skorupski, W.; Wieczorek, B. Simple methods for ambient air testing. Atmos. Prot. Probl. 1984. (In Polish) [Google Scholar]
Sensors 21 06190 g001 550
Figure 1. Distinctive sites in the study area indicative of significant degradation (a,b—photographs taken in 2019; c,d—photographs taken in 2020).
Figure 1. Distinctive sites in the study area indicative of significant degradation (a,b—photographs taken in 2019; c,d—photographs taken in 2020).
Sensors 21 06190 g001
Sensors 21 06190 g002 550
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of hydrogen sulphide concentration in series 2.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of hydrogen sulphide concentration in series 2.
Sensors 21 06190 g002
Sensors 21 06190 g003 550
Figure 3. Boxplots of compound concentrations in the five series (time points).
Figure 3. Boxplots of compound concentrations in the five series (time points).
Sensors 21 06190 g003
Table
Table 1. Portable gas detector chemical sensors characteristic [20,51].
Table 1. Portable gas detector chemical sensors characteristic [20,51].
CompoundSensor TypeRangeResolutionIonization Energy (IE)Response Time (RT)Calibration Gas
VOCsphotoionization detector (PID)0–1000 ppm0.01 ppm10.6 eV15 sC4H8 (10.02 ppm; 100 ppm)
NH3electrochemical (EC)0–100 ppm1 ppmNot applicable60 sNH3 (46.44 ppm)
H2S0–100 ppm0.1 ppmNot applicable35 sH2S (25.8 ppm)
CH3SH0–10 ppm0.1 ppmNot applicable<35 sCH3SH (5 ppm)
CH4protected catalytic bead0–100%0.1%Not applicable30 s50% CH4
Table
Table 2. Schedule of the measurement series.
Table 2. Schedule of the measurement series.
NoDateTemperature (°C)Humidity (%)Wind Speed (m/s)
Mean
120 November 20192.178.42.9
215 January 20200.282.34.9
311 March 20206.277.53.6
43 June 202014.762.82.7
517 June 202020.175.22.1
624 June 202017.490.15.6
Table
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the results achieved in all measurement series.
Table 3. Descriptive statistics of the results achieved in all measurement series.
Concentration
cod [ou/m3]NH3 [ppm]VOC [ppm]H2S [ppm]CH3SH [ppm]
Sample size380380380380380
Maximum75009817199.610.0
Mean123723.811.513.73.89
Median1115.001.602.452.85
Minimum000.000.000.00
Standard deviation202532.926.227.23.77
Table
Table 4. One-way ANOVA results of concentration values grouped by the number of the series.
Table 4. One-way ANOVA results of concentration values grouped by the number of the series.
Concentration Fp
cod [ou/m3]0.31670.867
NH3 [ppm]7.8263<0.001
H2S [ppm]0.05780.994
CH3SH [ppm]1.06280.376
VOC [ppm]3.96150.004
Abbreviations: F—Fisher’s statistic coefficient; p—p-value (test probability).
Table
Table 5. Games–Howell post hoc test for ammonium nitrogen results.
Table 5. Games–Howell post hoc test for ammonium nitrogen results.
Coefficients Series
12345
1Mean difference—−15.9 **−16.895 **−16.9342 **−15.816 **
p-value—0.0060.0030.0030.006
2Mean difference —−0.974−1.01320.105
p-value —111
3Mean difference —−0.03951.079
p-value —11
4Mean difference —1.118
p-value —1
5Mean difference —
p-value —
Note: ** p < 0.01.
Table
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation matrix among the different analytes for all times series.
Table 6. Pearson’s correlation matrix among the different analytes for all times series.
Concentration
Concentration Coefficients cod [ou/m3]NH3 [ppm]VOC [ppm]H2S [ppm]CH3SH [ppm]
cod [ou/m3]Pearson’s r—
95% CI Upper—
95% CI Lower—
NH3 [ppm]Pearson’s r0.552 ***—
95% CI Upper0.619—
95% CI Lower0.478—
VOC [ppm]Pearson’s r0.656 ***0.582 ***—
95% CI Upper0.710.645—
95% CI Lower0.5940.512—
H2S [ppm]Pearson’s r0.864 ***0.567 ***0.786 ***—
95% CI Upper0.8880.6320.822—
95% CI Lower0.8360.4950.744—
CH3SH [ppm]Pearson’s r0.658 ***0.632 ***0.421 ***0.472 ***—
95% CI Upper0.7120.6890.50.546—
95% CI Lower0.5970.5680.3340.39—
Note: *** p < 0.001. Abbreviations: 95% CI Upper—upper confidence interval; 95% CI Lower—lower confidence interval.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulig, A.; Szyłak-Szydłowski, M.; Wiśniewska, M. Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas. Sensors 2021, 21, 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186190

AMA Style

Kulig A, Szyłak-Szydłowski M, Wiśniewska M. Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas. Sensors. 2021; 21(18):6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186190

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulig, Andrzej, Mirosław Szyłak-Szydłowski, and Marta Wiśniewska. 2021. "Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas" Sensors 21, no. 18: 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186190

APA Style

Kulig, A., Szyłak-Szydłowski, M., & Wiśniewska, M. (2021). Application of Chemical Sensors and Olfactometry Method in Ecological Audits of Degraded Areas. Sensors, 21(18), 6190. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21186190

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop