Next Article in Journal
Detection of Lung Cancer Cells in Solutions Using a Terahertz Chemical Microscope
Next Article in Special Issue
Classification of Cracks in Composite Structures Subjected to Low-Velocity Impact Using Distribution-Based Segmentation and Wavelet Analysis of X-ray Tomograms
Previous Article in Journal
Ionizing Radiation Monitoring Technology at the Verge of Internet of Things
Previous Article in Special Issue
SAP-Net: A Simple and Robust 3D Point Cloud Registration Network Based on Local Shape Features
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Multiple Cylinder Extraction from Organized Point Clouds

Sensors 2021, 21(22), 7630; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227630
by Saed Moradi 1,2, Denis Laurendeau 1,2,* and Clement Gosselin 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2021, 21(22), 7630; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227630
Submission received: 11 October 2021 / Revised: 7 November 2021 / Accepted: 11 November 2021 / Published: 17 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensing and Processing for 3D Computer Vision)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a well-written and structured paper, the investigation results are nicely presented with a proper conclusion.My suggestions are minor, more related to some non-so-relevant details.A literature review might be extended, especially with the potential application of the results, which would be good to discuss too. Figure - maybe add a unit of measure on axis. Figure needs to be positioned according to the text where they are referenced. For example, the figures are in the middle of the conclusion section. Font sizes on images are not consistent due to the printed pages. Line 57 and 64, the sentences starting In [xx], - rewrite.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

The comments on your review are addressed in the attached document.

Thank you very much for your time and advice.

Denis Laurendeau

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript discusses the extraction of multiple cylinder objects from point clouds. This work demonstrates a thorough investigation and is well-structured in its approach.

However, this manuscript may be improved by stating the following:
1) We see that, based on the results of the experiments, the technique successfully extracts 3-cylinder objects from the input data. However, it is preferable if the research could demonstrate or specifying the number of cylinders that can be detected using this method. Given the title, multiple cylinder extraction, the author can clarify the number of cylinders that can be extracted.
2) Apart from that, how will the spacing/distance between the cylinders effect this technique? This is because the results of the experiments indicate that the cylinders tested are near to the viewing distance. If the author can explain this, it can be used as a reference for other studies.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

The comments on your review are addressed in the attached document.

Thank you very much for your time and advice.

Denis Laurendeau

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have addressed the points highlighted in the previous review report.

Back to TopTop