Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Provided a comprehensive review with technical insights on the current standardization efforts of the key enabling communication technologies including Wi-Fi 6 and 5G.
- Discussed the challenges in regards to cooperative computation, privacy/security, and over-the-air updates facing CV technology and pointed out open research issues that need attention by the research community.
- Presented safety and non-safety applications and directed the reader’s attention to some unnoticed innovative applications’ research scope.
- Drew the boundaries of the opportunities that the CV technology brings to our life.
2. Enabling Technologies
2.1. DSRC
2.2. Wi-Fi 6
2.3. 5G-Cellular Technology
- Service and Business Models. The increasing number of connected IoT devices to the internet through 5G necessitates the requirement for new business and service paradigms. The 5G network technology is deemed ideal for connecting IoT devices, and hence forming a separate subscription for every device is considered insignificant. This derives the investments to improve and enhance the infrastructure network to be capable of delivering QoS services at the edge. Moreover, the impact of 5G bandwidth on the backhaul networks and the frequent dynamic of the mobile devices impose a great challenge for delivering services in regards to virtualization and edge computing [35].
- Centralized Architecture of Cellular Networks. The centralized-based architecture of the cellular networks will pose a great challenge in correspondence to CV environments. By design, transmitted information by vehicles have to be initially sent to the base station (BS), and hence it extends the latency for message delivery. This imposes drawbacks in safety time-critical applications, where these applications require ultra-low latency. For example, in a unicast mode situation, a vehicle transmits safety-critical information to the cellular BS, and this message is then either broadcast to all the vehicles within the BS’s cell range or to the pertinent vehicles only. In these two situations, the downlink channel becomes traffic jammed even when there are a considerable number of vehicles [28,36]. Proposed solutions for broadcasting safety messages include multimedia broadcast and multicast services (MBMS) along with the evolved multimedia broadcast and multicast services (eMBMS), which are incorporated in the 3GPPP standard. In broadcasting situations, the safety data is broadcast by BS to all vehicles in its cellular range. In this manner, vehicles decide on the relevancy of the received safety data whether to use this information or discard it. Thus, vehicles may perform unnecessary computation. The utilization of multicast services, where data is delivered to a multicast group of vehicles, is considered to be one of the proposed solutions for this issue [28].
- Interference at Low-level Altitude. In CV environments, vehicles should be able to discover and communicate with nearby vehicles occasionally. A significant specification of 5G-enabled telecommunication is the availability of the proximity service (ProSe) [37,38]. The main purpose of ProSe is to enable vehicles to have a better perception by discovering devices and services based on the position and geographical location information [21,38]. ProSe is considered critical for many applications and communication opportunities within a specified range. Moreover, it provides communication and discovery in an ad-hoc manner, which is considered most convenient for safety-critical applications. However, the paradigm shift in ProSe gives rise to radio propagation among vehicles that is caused by high buildings, towers, and many other obstructions in urban canyons and metropolitan areas, for example, which lead to a high level of interference [38].
2.4. Hybrid Architecture
3. Applications
- Vehicle to occupant (driver/passenger) (V2O). Enabling features like BLE/UWB-enabled phone-as-a-key; in-vehicle connectivity services for work, play, and commerce; driving error recognition and prediction; and QoX.
- Vehicle to vulnerable road users (V2VRU). VRUs include pedestrians/jaywalkers and cyclists as well as motor-cyclists and persons with disabilities or reduced mobility and orientation. V2VRU can be an enabler for VRU detection, crossing intent and motion behavior recognition, and pre-crash warning.
- Vehicle to vehicle (V2V). Applications incldue post-crash warning, pre-crash warning, lane-change warning, cooperative collision warning, cooperative adaptive cruise control, visibility enhancement, wrong-way driver warning, intersection movement assistance, blind-spot warning, cooperative forward-collision warning, vehicle-based road-condition warning, communication relaying in case of emergency, smart cargo companions, last-mile delivery systems, fleet management systems, and self-organized autonomous vehicles.
- Vehicle to environment (V2E) includes road-condition monitoring, traffic-sign and light recognition, driving risk prediction, and perimeter monitoring systems.
- Vehicle to infrastructure (V2I). V2I is used for road-condition warning, SOS services, work-zone warning, do-not-pass warning, emergency vehicle signal preemption, intersection collision warning, in-vehicle amber alert, remote diagnostics and repair, pedestrian crossing information, red-light warning, pedestrian detection and warning, bicycle detection and warning, no left-hand turn warning, traffic condition monitoring, weather conditions, traffic light management systems, interaction management systems, parking management systems, and teleoperation in case of malfunctioning self-driving cars. For example, OnStar services provide automatic collision notification, enhanced roadside assistance, SOS emergency assistance, automatic diagnostic trouble code notifications, monthly vehicle health reports, service links, maintenance reminders, driving information, and on-demand diagnostics.
- Vehicle to network (V2N). V2N is used for disabled roadside vehicle warning, security credential management systems, multi-model mobility systems, dynamic on-demand mobility systems and services, cloud-based crowd-sensing services, real-time traffic monitoring, and for bringing attractive consumer experiences into the cabin to foster brand loyalty.
3.1. Safety Applications
3.1.1. Red-Light-Violation Warning (RLVW)
3.1.2. Emergency Electronic Brake Light Warning (EEBL)
3.1.3. Curve-Speed Warning (CSW)
3.1.4. Platooning
3.2. Non-Safety Applications
3.2.1. Infotainment Applications
3.2.2. Vehicle as a Mobile Service Provider
3.3. Research Potential for Applications
3.3.1. Data Monetization
3.3.2. Last-Mile Delivery Services
3.3.3. Smart Intersection Management Systems
3.3.4. Collaboration of Smartphone Applications with Vehicles
4. Challenges
4.1. Integration of Communication and Computation
4.2. Over-the-Air (OTA) Updates
4.3. Privacy and Security
5. Opportunities
6. Conclusions and Future Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018: Summary; Technical Report; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Road Traffic Injuries. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries (accessed on 11 July 2021).
- Fleming, C. Economic Impact of Traffic Accidents? About $1 Trillion a Year—Los Angeles Times. Available online: https://www.latimes.com/business/autos/la-fi-hy-economic-impact-of-traffic-accidents-20140529-story.html (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- AVIN. Opportunities for Connected Vehicles beyond Transportation; Avin Specialized Report; Ontario Center of Excellence: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Guerrero-Ibáñez, J.; Zeadally, S.; Contreras-Castillo, J. Sensor technologies for intelligent transportation systems. Sensors 2018, 18, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Spectrum, IEEE. The Car in the Age of Connectivity Enabling Car to Cloud Connectivity. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/telecom/wireless/the-car-in-the-age-of-connectivity-enabling-car-to-cloud-connectivity (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Reuters. Connected Cars Market Size 2019 Overview by Emergence of IoT, Safety Protocols, Automotive Technologies, Ecosystem, Trends, Business Opportunities. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/brandfeatures/venture-capital/article?id=123458 (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Statista, Projected Size of the Global Connected Car Market in 2016 and 2021, by Segment. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/297816/connected-car-market-size-by-segment (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Carroll, J. Five Facts You Need to Know About the Connected Car. The Race is On to Capture In-Vehicle Commerce. Available online: https://www.tsys.com/news-innovation/whats-new/Articles-and-Blogs/nGenuity-Journal/five-facts-you-need-to-know-about-the-connected-car-the-race-is-on-to-capture-in-vehicle-commerce.html (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Lu, N.; Cheng, N.; Zhang, N.; Shen, X.; Mark, J.W. Connected vehicles: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2014, 1, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siegel, J.E.; Erb, D.C.; Sarma, S.E. A survey of the connected vehicle landscape—Architectures, enabling technologies, applications, and development areas. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 2391–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coppola, R.; Morisio, M. Connected car: Technologies, issues, future trends. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2016, 49, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ersal, T.; Kolmanovsky, I.; Masoud, N.; Ozay, N.; Scruggs, J.; Vasudevan, R.; Orosz, G. Connected and automated road vehicles: State of the art and future challenges. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 2020, 58, 672–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Datta, S.K.; Da Costa, R.P.F.; Härri, J.; Bonnet, C. Integrating connected vehicles in Internet of Things ecosystems: Challenges and solutions. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 17th International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM), Coimbra, Portugal, 21–24 June 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Bertoncello, M.; Martens, C.; Möller, T.; Schneiderbauer, T. Unlocking the Full Life-Cycle Value from Connected-Car Data. 2021. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/unlocking-the-full-life-cycle-value-from-connected-car-data (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Bertoncello, M.; Husain, A.; Möller, T. Setting the framework for car connectivity and user experience. McKinsey Quarterly, November 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Z.; Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, M.H.; Wang, Z. DSRC versus 4G-LTE for connected vehicle applications: A study on field experiments of vehicular communication performance. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 2017, 2750452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bey, T.; Tewolde, G. Evaluation of DSRC and LTE for V2X. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 9th Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 7–9 January 2019; pp. 1032–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, S.; Lim, A.; Bevly, D. An empirical study of DSRC V2V performance in truck platooning scenarios. Digit. Commun. Netw. 2016, 2, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xiong, W.; He, S.; Qiu, T.Z. Research on connected vehicle architecture based on DSRC technology. In Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Transportation Information and Safety (ICTIS), Banff, AB, Canada, 8–10 August 2017; pp. 530–534. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Fuqaha, A.; Guizani, M.; Mohammadi, M.; Aledhari, M.; Ayyash, M. Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols and Applications. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2015, 17, 2347–2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouk, S.H.; Kim, G.; Ahmed, S.H.; Kim, D. Hybrid adaptive beaconing in vehicular ad hoc networks: A survey. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 390360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International, SAE. Vehicle Safety Communications Landscape Clarified with Controversial FCC Ruling. Available online: https://www.sae.org/news/2020/11/fcc-5.9-ghz-cv2x-decision (accessed on 12 July 2021).
- Howard, B. For Vehicle Safety Communications, Ford Chooses Cellular Over DSRC. Available online: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/283253-ces-ford-chooses-cellular-not-dsrc-for-vehicle-safety-communications (accessed on 15 July 2021).
- International, SAE. New Cooperative Driving Automation Standard Provides Clarity to Support Advancement of Full Automation. Available online: https://www.sae.org/news/2020/06/new-cooperative-driving-automation-standard (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- Karlsson, P.; Lönegård, F. Wi-Fi 6 Will Streamline Automotive Connectivity. Available online: https://www.edn.com/wi-fi-6-will-streamline-automotive-connectivity (accessed on 1 November 2021).
- James, J. 6 Reasons Why Automotive OEMs Are Upgrading to Wi-Fi 6. Available online: https://www.nxp.com/company/blog/6-reasons-why-automotive-oems-are-upgrading-to-wi-fi-6:BL-6-REASONS-TO-UPGRADE-TO-WI-FI-6 (accessed on 20 July 2021).
- Abboud, K.; Omar, H.A.; Zhuang, W. Interworking of DSRC and cellular network technologies for V2X communications: A survey. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2016, 65, 9457–9470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ullah, H.; Nair, N.G.; Moore, A.; Nugent, C.; Muschamp, P.; Cuevas, M. 5G communication: An overview of vehicle-to-everything, drones, and healthcare use-cases. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 37251–37268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- 3GPP, A.G.I. 3GPP Release 15. Available online: https://www.3gpp.org/release-15 (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- ETSI. TS 123 501-V15.9.0-5G; System Architecture for the 5G System (5GS) (3GPP TS 23.501 Version 15.9.0 Release 15. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–23 June 2021. Technical Report. [Google Scholar]
- Storck, C.R.; Duarte-Figueiredo, F. A 5G V2X ecosystem providing internet of vehicles. Sensors 2019, 19, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Liang, L.; Peng, H.; Li, G.Y.; Shen, X. Vehicular Communications: A Physical Layer Perspective. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2017, 66, 10647–10659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkenyereye, L.; Nkenyereye, L.; Islam, S.; Choi, Y.H.; Bilal, M.; Jang, J.W. Software-defined network-based vehicular networks: A position paper on their modeling and implementation. Sensors 2019, 19, 3778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loghin, D.; Cai, S.; Chen, G.; Dinh, T.T.A.; Fan, F.; Lin, Q.; Ng, J.; Ooi, B.C.; Sun, X.; Ta, Q.T.; et al. The Disruptions of 5G on Data-driven Technologies and Applications. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.08096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Calabuig, J.; Monserrat, J.F.; Gozalvez, D.; Klemp, O. Safety on the roads: LTE alternatives for sending ITS messages. IEEE Veh. Technol. Mag. 2014, 9, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Andrews, J.G.; Ghosh, A.; Ratasuk, R. An overview of 3GPP device-to-device proximity services. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2014, 52, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Shah, S.A.A.; Ahmed, E.; Imran, M.; Zeadally, S. 5G for Vehicular Communications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ericsson. Here’s What You Need to Know about 5G and C-V2X. Available online: https://www.ericsson.com/en/news/2019/9/5g-and-v2x (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- Orange, H.F. 5G and connected vehicles: Communication and Cooperation. Available online: https://hellofuture.orange.com/en/5g-and-connected-vehicles-communication-and-cooperation (accessed on 5 November 2021).
- Ericsson. Non-Standalone and Standalone: Two Standards-Based Paths to 5G. 2019. Available online: https://www.ericsson.com/en/blog/2019/7/standalone-and-non-standalone-5g-nr-two-5g-tracks (accessed on 5 October 2021).
- Bagheri, H.; Noor-A-Rahim, M.; Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Xiao, P. 5G NR-V2X: Towards connected and cooperative autonomous driving. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2009.03638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naik, G.; Choudhury, B.; Park, J. IEEE 802.11bd 5G NR V2X: Evolution of Radio Access Technologies for V2X Communications. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 70169–70184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dey, A.K. Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2001, 5, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nokia. Connected Vehicles Making Journeys Safer, More Efficient, and More Fun. Available online: https://www.nokia.com/networks/5g/use-cases/connected-vehicles/ (accessed on 5 October 2021).
- Qualcomm. Snapdragon Automotive 5G Platform. Available online: https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon-automotive-5g-platform (accessed on 7 October 2021).
- Qualcomm. Qualcomm Announces Automotive Industry’s First 5G Dual SIM Dual Active and Latest 4G LTE-Advanced Pro-Tiered Platform Portfolio With Integrated C-V2X and Precise Positioning Support For Next Generation Vehicles. Available online: https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2019/02/25/qualcomm-announces-automotive-industrys-first-5g-dual-sim-dual-active-and (accessed on 8 October 2021).
- Mathew, M. Pirelli Becomes First Company to Develop Tires that Interact with 5G Network. Available online: https://tiresandparts.net/news/new-business-ideas/pirelli-becomes-first-company-to-develop-tires-that-interact-with-5g-network/ (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Wang, J.; Shao, Y.; Ge, Y.; Yu, R. A survey of vehicle to everything (v2x) testing. Sensors 2019, 19, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Owen, G. Wi-Fi 6E—A Viable Alternative to 5G NR for Low-Latency Applications? Available online: https://www.counterpointresearch.com/wi-fi-66e-a-viable-alternative-to-5g-nr-for-low-latency-applications/ (accessed on 4 November 2021).
- Oughton, E.J.; Lehr, W.; Katsaros, K.; Selinis, I. Revisiting wireless internet connectivity: 5G vs Wi-Fi 6. Telecommun. Policy 2017, 45, 102127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, X.; Qin, W.; Xiang, B. Research on a DSRC-based rear-end collision warning model. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2014, 15, 1054–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tangemann, C. 5G and C-2VX: The Answer to the Connected Car Future. Available online: https://www.automotive-iq.com/electrics-electronics/articles/5g-and-c-2vx-the-answer-to-the-connected-car-future (accessed on 15 October 2021).
- Ucar, S.; Ergen, S.C.; Ozkasap, O. Multihop-cluster-based IEEE 802.11 p and LTE hybrid architecture for VANET safety message dissemination. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2016, 65, 2621–2636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sherazi, H.H.R.; Khan, Z.A.; Iqbal, R.; Rizwan, S.; Imran, M.A.; Awan, K. A heterogeneous IoV architecture for data forwarding in vehicle to infrastructure communication. Mob. Inf. Syst. 2019, 2019, 3101276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Djilali, Y.D.; Bakhtil, Y.; Kouninef, B.; Senouci, B. Performances evaluation study of VANET communication technologies for smart and autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2018 Tenth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Prague, Czech Republic, 3–6 July 2018; pp. 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Ali, G.; Pesch, D.; Xiao, P. A Survey on Resource Allocation in Vehicular Networks. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1909.13587. [Google Scholar]
- Xiang, W.; Zheng, K.; Shen, X.S. 5G Mobile Communications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Congress, G.C. ABI Research: Implementing DSRC above Cellular is More Cost-Effective than Implementing C-V2X. Available online: https://www.greencarcongress.com/2018/02/20180207-abi.html (accessed on 11 October 2021).
- Guerrero-Ibanez, J.A.; Zeadally, S.; Contreras-Castillo, J. Integration challenges of intelligent transportation systems with connected vehicle, cloud computing, and internet of things. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2015, 22, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mostafizi, A.; Dong, S.; Wang, H. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2017, 85, 312–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minelli, S.; Izadpanah, P.; Razavi, S. Evaluation of connected vehicle impact on mobility and mode choice. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2015, 2, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vahidi, A.; Sciarretta, A. Energy saving potentials of connected and automated vehicles. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 95, 822–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, K.; Huang, Y.; Qin, Y.; Hu, C.; Tang, X. Potential and challenges to improve vehicle energy efficiency via V2X: Literature review. Int. J. Veh. Perform. 2021, 7, 244–265. [Google Scholar]
- Caveney, D. Cooperative Vehicular Safety Applications. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 2010, 30, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matthews, A. Active and Passive Automotive Safety Systems. Available online: https://automotive.electronicspecifier.com/safety/active-and-passive-automotive-safety-systems (accessed on 8 August 2021).
- Ghassan, S.; Tareq, A. Intelligent emergency message broadcasting in VANET using PSO. arXiv 2014, arXiv:1406.7399. [Google Scholar]
- Balador, A.; Uhlemann, E.; Calafate, C.T.; Cano, J.C. Supporting beacon and event-driven messages in vehicular platoons through token-based strategies. Sensors 2018, 18, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Peng, H.; Liang, L.; Shen, X.; Li, G.Y. Vehicular communications: A network layer perspective. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 1064–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, J.; Peeta, S.; Lu, L.; Li, T. Multiclass information flow propagation control under vehicle-to-vehicle communication environments. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2019, 129, 96–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Li, M.; Li, Z.; Xu, C.; Liu, T. Short-term prediction of safety and operation impacts of lane changes in oscillations with empirical vehicle trajectories. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2020, 135, 105345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Xie, Y.; Huang, H.; Liu, P. A review of surrogate safety measures and their applications in connected and automated vehicles safety modeling. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2021, 157, 106157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CVRIA. Red Light Violation Warning. Available online: https://local.iteris.com/cvria/html/applications/app57.html (accessed on 14 October 2021).
- Yan, X.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y. Effect of audio in-vehicle red light–running warning message on driving behavior based on a driving simulator experiment. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2015, 16, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, N.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.; Lim, K.; Ko, Y.; Jeong, N.; Smith, A.H.; McNally, H.A. Red Light Running Prediction System using LIDAR. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Sophia Antipolis, France, 11–13 March 2019; Volume 3, pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Zhao, B.; Liu, B. Distance and velocity measurement of coherent lidar based on chirp pulse compression. Sensors 2019, 19, 2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Royo, S.; Ballesta-Garcia, M. An overview of lidar imaging systems for autonomous vehicles. Sensors 2019, 9, 4093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Chen, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, L. Bayesian network for red-light-running prediction at signalized intersections. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 23, 120–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.; Jia, X.; Shao, C. Predicting Driver Behavior during the Yellow Interval Using Video Surveillance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Howe, G.; Xu, G.; Hoover, D.; Elsasser, D.; Barickman, F. Commercial Connected Vehicle Test Procedure Development and Test Results–Blind Spot Warning/Lane Change Warning; Technical Report DOT HS 812 317; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Szczurek, P.; Xu, B.; Wolfson, O.; Lin, J. Estimating relevance for the emergency electronic brake light application. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2012, 13, 1638–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CVRIA. Emergency Electronic Brake Light. Available online: https://local.iteris.com/cvria/html/applications/app23.html (accessed on 13 October 2021).
- Tsai, M.F.; Chao, Y.C.; Chen, L.W.; Chilamkurti, N.; Rho, S. Cooperative emergency braking warning system in vehicular networks. EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw. 2015, 2015, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Payre, W.; Diels, C. Designing in-vehicle signs for connected vehicle features: Does appropriateness guarantee comprehension? Appl. Ergon. 2019, 80, 102–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Denny, S.; Jeremy, S.; Rachel, K. Vehicle to Infrastructure(V2I) Safety Applications; Technical Report FHWA-JPO-16-249; U.S. Department of Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- CVRIA. Curve Speed Warning. Available online: https://local.iteris.com/cvria/html/applications/app13.html (accessed on 12 October 2021).
- Gámez Serna, C.; Ruichek, Y. Dynamic speed adaptation for path tracking based on curvature information and speed limits. Sensors 2017, 17, 1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- He, X.; Zhang, X.; Tang, L.; Liu, W. Instantaneous real-time kinematic decimeter-level positioning with BeiDou triple-frequency signals over medium baselines. Sensors 2016, 16, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi, A.; Machiani, S.G. Drivers’ performance examination using a personalized adaptive curve speed warning: Driving simulator study. Int. J. Hum.-Interact. 2019, 35, 996–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truck Platooning: The Band of Semi-Trailers. Available online: https://www.labroots.com/trending/chemistry-and-physics/7405/band-semi-trailers-truck-platooning (accessed on 17 July 2021).
- Bishop, R. Where Does Auto-Followers Platooning Fit within the Driverless Truck Ecosystem? Available online: https://www.forbes.com/sites/richardbishop1/2019/08/30/where-does-auto-follower-platooning-fit-within-the-driverless-truck-ecosystem/?sh=3103e3f93c0c (accessed on 16 June 2021).
- Boubakri, A.; Gammar, S.M. Intra-Platoon Communication in Autonomous Vehicle: A survey. In Proceedings of the 2020 9th IFIP International Conference on Performance Evaluation and Modeling in Wireless Networks (PEMWN), Berlin, Germany, 1–3 December 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Quadri, C.; Mancuso, V.; Ajmone Marsan, M.; Rossi, G.P. Platooning on the edge. In Proceedings of the 23rd International ACM Conference on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems, Alicante, Spain, 22–26 November 2020; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Vu, H.V.; Liu, Z.; Nguyen, D.H.; Morawski, R.; Le-Ngoc, T. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for joint channel assignment and power allocation in platoon-based C-V2X systems. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.04555. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Hua, X.; Wang, S. Safety Analysis of a Modified Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control Algorithm Accounting for Communication Delay. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Automotive, C. 4 Infotainment Features on Your Connected Car Dashboard. Available online: https://www.crsautomotive.com/4-infotainment-features-on-your-connected-car-dashboard/ (accessed on 9 October 2021).
- Zhang, J.; Letaief, K.B. Mobile Edge Intelligence and Computing for the Internet of Vehicles. Proc. IEEE 2020, 108, 246–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abdelhamid, S.; Hassanein, H.S.; Takahara, G. Vehicle as a resource (VaaR). IEEE Netw. 2015, 29, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hiltbrand, T. A Framework for Data Monetization. Available online: https://tdwi.org/articles/2018/10/09/biz-all-a-framework-for-data-monetization.aspx (accessed on 8 October 2021).
- Wixom, B.H.; Tallon, P. A SAS Best Practices White Paper for Data Monetization Best Practices Anne BUFF; Technical Report 402; SAS: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Mohasseb, S. Framing a Winning Data Monetization Strategy; KPMG: Amstelveen, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Masini, B.M.; Bazzi, A.; Zanella, A. A survey on the roadmap to mandate on board connectivity and enable V2V-based vehicular sensor networks. Sensors 2018, 18, 2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bay, O. Sensor Data Crowdsourcing to Transform Connected Car Services. Available online: https://www.abiresearch.com/press/sensor-data-crowdsourcing-transform-connected-car-services/ (accessed on 2 October 2021).
- Hawkins, A.J. GM’s Data Mining Is Just the Beginning of the In-Car Advertising Blitz. Available online: https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/17/17990052/gm-radio-listen-tracking-habits-advertising-future (accessed on 1 October 2021).
- Motors, G. Marketplace. Available online: https://gmmarketplace.gm.com/ (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- Goodman, R. Whatever you call it, just don’t think of last-mile logistics, last. Glob. Logist. Supply Chain Strateg. 2005, 9, 46–51. [Google Scholar]
- Niels, T.; Hof, M.T.; Bogenberger, K. Design and operation of an urban electric courier cargo bike system. In Proceedings of the 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Maui, HI, USA, 4–7 November 2018; pp. 2531–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reyes, D.; Savelsbergh, M.; Toriello, A. Vehicle routing with roaming delivery locations. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2017, 80, 71–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheth, M.; Butrina, P.; Goodchild, A.; McCormack, E. Measuring delivery route cost trade-offs between electric-assist cargo bicycles and delivery trucks in dense urban areas. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- UMDaily. Big Problems, Micro Solutions: Electric Cargo Bikes to the Rescue. Available online: https://urbanmobilitydaily.com/big-problems-micro-solutions-electric-cargo-bikes-to-the-rescue/ (accessed on 5 October 2021).
- Joerss, M.; Schröder, J.; Neuhaus, F.; Klink, C.; Mann, F. Parcel Delivery: The Future of Last Mile; McKinsey & Company: Tokyo, Japan, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Nianzhen, L. How a Chinese Drone Delivery Startup Is Capitalizing on COVID-19. Available online: https://asia.nikkei.com/Business/Startups/How-a-Chinese-drone-delivery-startup-is-capitalizing-on-COVID-19 (accessed on 15 July 2021).
- Post, B. Robot to Deliver Meals, Medication to COVID-19 Patients in S’pore9. Available online: https://www.bangkokpost.com/world/1872349/robot-to-deliver-meals-medication-to-covid-19-patients-in-spore (accessed on 15 July 2021).
- Guizzo, E. Robot Vehicles Make Contactless Deliveries Amid Coronavirus Quarantine. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/transportation/self-driving/robot-vehicles-make-contactless-deliveries-amid-coronavirus-quarantine (accessed on 11 July 2021).
- Crowe, S. Nuro Driverless Vehicles Approved for Delivery Tests in California. Available online: https://www.therobotreport.com/nuro-driverless-delivery-vehicles-approved-california/ (accessed on 11 July 2021).
- Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, K.; Chen, L.; Wei, Z. Evolutionary dynamics of the last mile travel choice. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2019, 536, 122555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranieri, L.; Digiesi, S.; Silvestri, B.; Roccotelli, M. A review of last mile logistics innovations in an externalities cost reduction vision. Sustainability 2018, 10, 782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Azimi, R.; Bhatia, G.; Rajkumar, R.R.; Mudalige, P. STIP: Spatio-temporal intersection protocols for autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS), Berlin, Germany, 14–17 April 2014; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmati, Y.; Talebpour, A. Towards a collaborative connected, automated driving environment: A game theory based decision framework for unprotected left turn maneuvers. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 11–14 June 2017; pp. 1316–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namazi, E.; Li, J.; Lu, C. Intelligent intersection management systems considering autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 91946–91965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guler, S.I.; Menendez, M.; Meier, L. Using connected vehicle technology to improve the efficiency of intersections. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2014, 46, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, B.; Shi, Q.; Song, Z.; El Kamel, A. Trajectory planning for autonomous intersection management of connected vehicles. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2019, 90, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Wang, X.; Palacharla, P.; Ikeuchi, T. Dynamic Space-time Resource Allocation for Signal-less Intersection Management in a Connected Autonomous Vehicle Environment. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Changshu, China, 26–30 June 2018; pp. 1360–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Li, S.E.; Bian, Y.; Li, S.; Ban, X.J.; Wang, J.; Li, K. Distributed conflict-free cooperation for multiple connected vehicles at unsignalized intersections. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 93, 322–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khayatian, M.; Mehrabian, M.; Shrivastava, A. RIM: Robust intersection management for connected autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium (RTSS), Nashville, TN, USA, 11–14 December 2018; pp. 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World, A. How Bosch Is Transforming Driving with Connected Services. Available online: https://www.automotiveworld.com/news-releases/bosch-transforming-driving-connected-services/ (accessed on 7 July 2021).
- Ulrich, L. Available online: https://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/advanced-cars/smartphones-replace-fobs-for-keyless-vehicle-entry (accessed on 8 August 2021).
- Zhou, J.; Tian, D.; Wang, Y.; Sheng, Z.; Duan, X.; Leung, V.C. Reliability-optimal cooperative communication and computing in connected vehicle systems. IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput. 2019, 19, 1216–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boukerche, A.; Robson, E. Vehicular cloud computing: Architectures, applications, and mobility. Comput. Netw. 2018, 135, 171–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whaiduzzaman, M.; Sookhak, M.; Gani, A.; Buyya, R. A survey on vehicular cloud computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2014, 40, 325–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.; Wu, X.; Shi, W.; Zhong, H. OpenVDAP: An open vehicular data analytics platform for CAVs. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), Vienna, Austria, 2–6 July 2018; pp. 1310–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wu, X.; Shi, W. CAVBench: A benchmark suite for connected and autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM Symposium on Edge Computing (SEC), Seattle, WA, USA, 25–27 October 2018; Volume 3, pp. 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halder, S.; Ghosal, A.; Conti, M. Secure OTA Software Updates in Connected Vehicles: A survey. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1904.00685. [Google Scholar]
- Boehner, M. Security for Connected Vehicles throughout the Entire Life Cycle. ATZelectronics Worldw. 2019, 14, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Herberth, R.; Körper, S.; Stiesch, T.; Gauterin, F.; Bringmann, O. Automated Scheduling for Optimal Parallelization to Reduce the Duration of Vehicle Software Updates. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2019, 68, 2921–2933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, K. Automakers Embrace Over-the-Air Updates. Available online: https://www.consumerreports.org/automotive-technology/automakers-embrace-over-the-air-updates-can-we-trust-digital-car-repair (accessed on 8 August 2021).
- Davies, A. GM Gives All Its Vehicles a New Soul. Available online: https://www.wired.com/story/gm-gives-vehicles-new-soul (accessed on 8 August 2021).
- Singh, P.K.; Nandi, S.K.; Nandi, S. A tutorial survey on vehicular communication state of the art, and future research directions. Veh. Commun. 2019, 18, 100164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elmaghraby, A.S.; Losavio, M.M. Cyber security challenges in Smart Cities: Safety, security and privacy. J. Adv. Res. 2014, 5, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Greenberg, A. Hackers Remotely Kill a Jeep on the Highway—With Me in It. Available online: https://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/ (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- Othmane, L.B.; Weffers, H.; Mohamad, M.M.; Wolf, M. A survey of security and privacy in connected vehicles. In Wireless Sensor and Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 217–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathore, H.; Samant, A.; Jadliwala, M.; Mohamed, A. TangleCV: Decentralized Technique for Secure Message Sharing in Connected Vehicles. In Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Automotive Cybersecurity, Richardson, TX, USA, 27 March 2019; pp. 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamida, E.B.; Noura, H.; Znaidi, W. Security of cooperative intelligent transport systems: Standards, threats analysis and cryptographic countermeasures. Electronics 2015, 4, 380–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rathee, G.; Sharma, A.; Iqbal, R.; Aloqaily, M.; Jaglan, N.; Kumar, R. A blockchain framework for securing connected and autonomous vehicles. Sensors 2019, 19, 3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Abdollahi Biron, Z.; Dey, S.; Pisu, P. Real-Time Detection and Estimation of Denial of Service Attack in Connected Vehicle Systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2018, 19, 3893–3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cebe, M.; Erdin, E.; Akkaya, K.; Aksu, H.; Uluagac, S. Block4Forensic: An Integrated Lightweight Blockchain Framework for Forensics Applications of Connected Vehicles. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2018, 56, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Q.; Ji, T.; Guo, Y.; Yu, L.; Chen, X.; Li, P. TrafficChain: A Blockchain-Based Secure and Privacy-Preserving Traffic Map. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 60598–60612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alejandro, G.M.M.M.S.; Salvador, V.; Hiram, G.Z.; Raúl, R.; Miguel, Á.A. Multi-hop broadcast message dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks: A security perspective. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2017, 13, 1550147717741263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aoki, S.; Higuchi, T.; Altintas, O. Cooperative Perception with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Connected Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 19 October–13 November 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Thandavarayan, G.; Sepulcre, M.; Gozalvez, J. Redundancy Mitigation in Cooperative Perception for Connected and Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 91st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Spring), Antwerp, Belgium, 25–28 May 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sewalkar, P.; Seitz, J. Vehicle-to-pedestrian communication for vulnerable road users: Survey, design considerations, and challenges. Sensors 2019, 19, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nguyen, T.; Lechner, B.; Wong, Y.D. Response-based methods to measure road surface irregularity: A state-of-the-art review. Eur. Transp. Res. Rev. 2019, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singh, R.; Saluja, D.; Kumar, S. R-Comm: A Traffic Based Approaceh for Joint Vehicular Radar-Communication. IEEE Trans. Intell. Veh. 2021, 58, 672–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazahir, S.; Ahmed, S.; Alouini, M. A Survey on Joint Communication-Radar Systems. Front. Commun. Netw. 2021, 1, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moubayed, A.; Shami, A. Softwarization, virtualization, & machine learning for intelligent & effective V2X communications. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2006.04595. [Google Scholar]
- Memedi, A.; Dressler, F. A Location-Aware Cross-Layer MAC Protocol for Vehicular Visible Light Communications. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Mobility, Sensing and Networking, Exeter, UK, 13–15 December 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Giordani, M.; Polese, M.; Mezzavilla, M.; Rangan, S.; Zorzi, M. Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2020, 58, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Lee, H.; Khyam, M.O.; He, J.; Pesch, D.; Moessner, K.; Saad, W.; Poor, H.V. 6g for vehicle-to-everything (v2x) communications: Enabling technologies, challenges and opportunities. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2012.07753. [Google Scholar]
Features | DSRC | 5G-Cellular Technology | Wi-Fi 6 |
---|---|---|---|
Latency | Low latency and high reliability in less-congested areas [49]. | Latency is considered stable in comparison to DSRC. Expected <1 ms. | 2–3 ms [50]. |
Communication Range | 300–1000 m. | Up to 2000 m. | 50 m indoors and 300 m outdoors [51]. |
Benefits | Established and deployed technology. Have an allocated 5.9 GHz spectrum. Perform well in harsh weather conditions [52]. | Maximum download data rate can reach up to 4.5 Gb/s [53]. Covers a large area and is suitable for long-range applications. | Higher spectral efficiency/channel capacity. Broader outdoor coverage. |
Challenges | Short-term V2I interconnection. Low scalability in dense traffic environments. Unfairness in acquiring resources. | High communication cost. No established dedicated standard. Interference at low-level altitude. Centralized architecture of cellular networks. | Lower coverage range. |
Application Name | Description | References |
---|---|---|
RLVW | Drivers are informed if they are about to cross a red light. | [73,74,75,78] |
EEBL | Data is sent to alert drivers of hard braking performed by the vehicle in front of them. | [80,81,82,83,84] |
CSW | Drivers are notified that they are about to enter a curve with high speed | [85,86,87,89] |
Platooning | Vehicles/trucks maintain inter-vehicle distances and are synced (speed, routes, and braking) to achieve enhanced fuel consumption | [90,91,92,94] |
Infotainment | Commercial/entertainment applications | [96] |
Vehicle as a mobile service | Providing of other services beyond safety and entertainment such as localization or commercialization. | [4,97,98] |
Data monetization | Monetizing data to provide new innovative services. | [99,100,101,102,103,104,105] |
Last-mile delivery | Tackles efficient delivery of packages/parcels | [107,108,109,110,112,113,114,115,116,117] |
Smart intersection management | Intersection management at both signalized and non-signalized intersections to increase efficiency and decrease traffic delays. | [118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125] |
Collaboration of smartphone applications with the vehicle | Integrating smartphone applications to aid in some of vehicle’s functionality such as replacing keys with smartphone application. | [126,127] |
Challenges | Potential Research | State-of-the-Art Technology | References |
---|---|---|---|
Integration of communication and computation | Vehicular cloud computing with resource management problems | Vehicular mobile edge computing | [97,128,129,130,131,132] |
Over the Air (OTA) | Methodologies and techniques to decrease the OTA update duration time | Server/client | [133,134,135,136] |
Privacy and security | Need for lightweight and low overhead privacy and security algorithms | Blockchain technology | [139,140,141,142,143,144,145] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Abdelkader, G.; Elgazzar, K.; Khamis, A. Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Sensors 2021, 21, 7712. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227712
Abdelkader G, Elgazzar K, Khamis A. Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Sensors. 2021; 21(22):7712. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227712
Chicago/Turabian StyleAbdelkader, Ghadeer, Khalid Elgazzar, and Alaa Khamis. 2021. "Connected Vehicles: Technology Review, State of the Art, Challenges and Opportunities" Sensors 21, no. 22: 7712. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21227712