Next Article in Journal
Analysis of the Influence of Different Bionic Structures on the Noise Reduction Performance of the Centrifugal Pump
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Possibility of Translating Technological Advances in Non-Invasive Continuous Lactate Monitoring into Critical Care
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cu2O/PEDOT:PSS/ZnO Nanocomposite Material Biosensor for Esophageal Cancer Detection
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 21
Issue 3
10.3390/s21030883
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Linker-Free Magnetite-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Au): Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III)

by
Mohammed Sedki
1,†,
Guo Zhao
2,†,‡,
Shengcun Ma
3,
David Jassby
3 and
Ashok Mulchandani
2,4,*
1
Materials Science and Engineering Program, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
2
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
3
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
4
Center for Environmental Research and Technology (CE-CERT), University of California, Riverside, CA 92507, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
‡
Current address: College of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210031, China.
Sensors 2021, 21(3), 883; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030883
Submission received: 24 December 2020 / Revised: 23 January 2021 / Accepted: 25 January 2021 / Published: 28 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanomaterials for Environmental and Biological Monitoring)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Linker-free magnetite nanoparticles (Fe3O4NPs)-decorated gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) were grown using a new protocol that can be used as a new platform for synthesis of other intact metal–metal oxide nanocomposites without the need for linkers. This minimizes the distance between the metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and ensures the optimum combined effects between the two material interfaces. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy confirmed the successful synthesis of the Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite, without any change in the magnetite phase. Characterization, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy, revealed the composite to consist of AuNPs of 70 ± 10 nm diameter decorated with tiny 10 ± 3 nm diameter Fe3O4NPs in Au:Fe mass ratio of 5:1. The prepared Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite was embedded in ionic liquid (IL) and applied for the modification of glassy carbon electrode (GCE) for the electrochemical detection of As(III) in water. By combining the excellent catalytic properties of the AuNPs with the high adsorption capacity of the tiny Fe3O4NPs towards As(III), as well as the good conductivity of IL, the Fe3O4-Au-IL nanocomposite showed excellent performance in the square wave anodic stripping voltammetry detection of As(III). Under the optimized conditions, a linear range of 1 to 100 μg/L was achieved with a detection limit of 0.22 μg/L (S/N = 3), and no interference from 100-fold higher concentrations of a wide variety of cations and anions found in water. A very low residual standard deviation of 1.16% confirmed the high precision/reproducibility of As(III) analysis and the reliability of the Fe3O4-Au-IL sensing interface. Finally, this proposed sensing interface was successfully applied to analyzing synthetic river and wastewater samples with a 95–101% recovery, demonstrating excellent accuracy, even in complex synthetic river and wastewater samples containing high concentrations of humic acid without any sample pretreatments.

1. Introduction

The contamination of arsenic in water is a significant concern to human health [1,2,3], as exposure can lead to a range of acute and chronic diseases, such as dysphasia, facial edema, dehydration, jaundice, and cancer [4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Inorganic arsenic compounds, arsenite (As(III)) and arsenate (As(V)) commonly exist in the environment either due to geochemical enrichment or industrial processes. Arsenite and arsenate are more toxic than the organic forms. Arsenite, which is the most toxic, is a mobile and soluble form of arsenic [11]. Usually, the content of As(III) in water is a serious problem, because even though its concentration is very low, it is highly toxic even at trace levels and can enter the human body in different ways, causing serious health problems. The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended an upper limit of 10 ppb for total arsenic in drinking water [11].
Different analytical strategies based on spectrometry, such as atomic fluorescence spectrometry [12], inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) [13] and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry [14] are frequently used to determine As(III) at trace levels in a variety of samples. While these techniques have high sensitivity for As(III) detection, they have limitations of high operating cost, expensive instruments, requirement of professional operators and bulky instrumentation, which make them unsuitable for on-site routine analysis.
In contrast to these methods, electrochemical analyses, and in particular, anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), is a low cost, low limit of detection (LOD) sensing method that has the benefit of convenient operation, high sensitivity, and the ability to perform real-time analysis [15,16]. Usually, the fabrication of an electrochemical sensor based on electrode modification can be divided into the following steps [15,16,17,18]: 1. nanocomposites synthesis and characterization; 2. electrode fabrication and pretreatment; 3. electrode modification using the synthesized nanocomposites. Electrodes of various nano-materials/particles, such as carbon nanotubes, metal oxides, noble metals (Au, Ag and Pt), and graphene, have been used for As(III) determination [15,16,17,18]. Previous reports demonstrated that AuNPs-modified electrodes could enhance the anodic current response toward As(III) more effectively than other materials relying on chemical reduction by electrogenerated H2 [19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, these methods need strong acidic conditions to guarantee enough electrogenerated H2 availability for electrochemical reduction of As(III) to As(0) during the electrochemical reduction/deposition step. This limits the application of Au-based materials for the detection of As(III) by non-professionals and in the field.
Recently, a number of Fe3O4-based materials have been synthesized for arsenic removal because of the excellent arsenic adsorption ability of Fe3O4 [26,27]. In addition, some studies have been performed utilizing Fe3O4-based materials to analyze the concentration of As(III) [28,29]. However, the poor conductivity of Fe3O4 has limited its sensitivity for electrochemical detection. To improve the electrode conductivity and electrocatalytic activity, electrodes modified with Au-Fe3O4 nanocomposite were reported [30,31]. However, the synthesis procedures used linkers such as oleic acid, oleyl amine, or aminopropyl trimethoxy silane to attach/decorate Au nanoparticles on Fe3O4, required a high temperature and high-pressure autoclave for Fe3O4 synthesis, and were time-consuming (~24 h). The linker introduces separation between the adsorbed As(III) on magnetite and the Au nanoparticle catalyst that could potentially reduce electron transfer rate/efficiency [32]. Moreover, a large fraction of the adsorbing material surface area was covered/blocked by Au NPs.
Here, we report linker-free grown AuNPs decorated with Fe3O4NPs (Fe3O4-Au) nanocomposite using a facile, faster and green chemistry synthesis route for application in chemically modified electrode ASV detection of As (III) in water. The important differences in the nanocomposite material between this work and the literature include the morphology/architecture and synthesis method as follows. (1) There is no linker between Fe3O4 and Au, which minimizes the distance between the metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and ensures the optimum combined effects between the two material interfaces. (2) Nanocomposite consists of AuNPs (70 nm average diameter) decorated with very tiny (10 nm average diameter) Fe3O4NPs which provide a higher surface area of the adsorbent for As(III). (3) The synthesis uses a co-precipitation method that is performed at low temperature (80 °C) and atmospheric pressure and does not require harsh organic solvents to synthesize Fe3O4NPs.
The introduced material was used to modify the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE) and applied as a working electrode in the ASV detection of As(III). The results exhibited a comparable or higher sensitivity than the modified electrodes reported in the literature. The combination of AuNPs, Fe3O4 NPs, and IL resulted in many intriguing combined effects and catalytic abilities, such as an excellent ability to adsorb As(III), high electrical conductivity and good stability. In addition, the synthesis method introduced in this work can be used as a new platform for synthesis of intact metal-Fe3O4 nanocomposites without the need for any linkers to achieve the optimum combined effects between the materials. Moreover, the electrode materials were characterized using different techniques (CV, SEM, EDS, XRD, TEM and EIS). Furthermore, a dual-catalysis system has been proposed for the first time to investigate and explain the catalytic mechanism behind the phenomenon. Finally, the analytical application of Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE was tested for the measurement of As(III) in synthetic river water and wastewater samples.

2. Experimental

2.1. Reagents and Instruments

Ferrous chloride (FeCl2·4H2O), ferric chloride (FeCl3·6H2O), ethylene glycol (EG), ammonium hydroxide (NH4OH, 25%), sodium citrate, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (HAuCl4·3H2O), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), sodium acetate (CH3COONa), ammonium acetate (CH3COONH4), monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4), sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3), manganese sulfate (MnSO4), zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), magnesium sulfate (MgSO4), and calcium chloride (CaCl2) were purchased from Fisher Scientific (USA). Humic acid sodium salt (Technical grade) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Ionic liquid ([C4dmim][NTf2]) was obtained from IoLiTec Ionic Liquids Technologies, INC. (USA). Arsenic trioxide (As2O3) was purchased from Strem Chemicals, INC. (USA). An As(III) stock solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared by dissolving As2O3 in the 1.0 M aqueous NaOH. Sodium acetate trihydrate was obtained from Fisher Scientific (USA) and prepared as acetate buffer solution (0.2 M) with acetic acid for the electroanalysis of As(III).
The prepared Fe3O4NPs (magnetite), AuNPs, and Fe3O4-Au were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Zeiss 1540 XB Crossbeam scanning electron microscope.), transmission electron microscopy (TEM, FEI Tecnai12), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical Empyrean Series 2), and Fourier transform infra-red (FTIR, Thermo Nicolet 6700) spectroscopy. Electrochemical analysis, i.e., cyclic voltammetry (CV), square wave anodic stripping voltammetry (SWASV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were performed on a CH Instrument 760C electrochemical workstation. A three-electrode system and a 20 mL cell were used for all measurements, in which Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE, Pt wire, and Ag/AgCl electrode were used as working, counter, and reference electrodes, respectively. During the deposition step, the test solution was stirred using a magnetic stir bar. The As(III) in synthetic wastewater detected by ICP-MS (PerkinElmer NexION 2000) was used to confirm the robustness of our synthesis method in complex water streams.

2.2. Synthesis and Modification of Fe3O4-Au-IL Nanocomposite

In this procedure, Fe3O4NPs were prepared using the co-precipitation method, as reported earlier [33], with some modifications. The de-ionized (DI) water and reagents used in this procedure were all de-oxygenated before use. In brief, a mixture of FeCl2·4H2O and FeCl3·6H2O (20 mg and 32 mg, respectively) was added to the solution consisting of 20 mL of DI water and 20 mL of EG. The mixed solution was heated to 60 °C with stirring under nitrogen purging. Ammonia solution (5%) was added dropwise to the above solution until reaching the pH of 10, and then the reaction mixture was agitated for half an hour. The obtained mixture was washed a few times with DI water by means of an external magnet to remove the excess ammonia solution and surfactant. Quantities of 10 mL of HAuCl4·3H2O (20 mg/mL) and 10 mL of EG were added to the obtained Fe3O4NPs and stirred for 2 min at 80 °C. Then, 5 mL of sodium citrate (0.3%) was added to the Fe3O4-Au3+ solution and stirred at 80 °C for half an hour to obtain the Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite. The prepared suspension was washed with DI water by means of an external magnet to remove the excess surfactants and the free AuNPs that were not bonded to magnetite, if any. A quantity of 4 mL of Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite solution (1 mg/mL) was mixed with 300 μL of 0.5% ionic liquid (IL) in ethanol to obtain the Fe3O4-Au-IL hybrid structure. The surface of GCE was polished by 0.05 μm alumina powder before modification, and was then immersed in 1:1 HNO3, absolute ethanol and water for sonication, separately. Subsequently, 8 μL of the Fe3O4-Au-IL suspension was drop-casted onto the surface of GCE and dried in oven at 60 °C. Other electrodes were prepared the same way as described above.

2.3. Stripping Voltammetry Analysis of As(III)

The electrochemical measurements of SWASV were performed in a 0.2 M acetate buffer solution (pH 5.0) containing different concentrations of As(III). Unless stated otherwise, −0.9 V was used as a deposition/reduction potential for the pre-deposition of As(III) under stirring for 200 s. The stirring was stopped once the deposition step was completed. An anodic stripping voltammogram was obtained from −0.4 to 0.3 V after an equilibration period of 10 s. The frequency, amplitude and potential step were 25 Hz, 25 mV and 5 mV, respectively. To regenerate the modified electrode before the next measurement at the end of stripping, an oxidation potential of 0.6 V was applied to the working electrode for 120 s to remove any As(0) residuals which may not be completely stripped from the electrode surface.

2.4. Preparation of Water Samples

DI water containing 150 ppm magnesium nitrate, 60 ppm ammonia chloride, 500 ppm calcium chloride, 50 ppm sodium citrate and 500 ppm potassium calcium chloride (1260 ppm total dissolved solids), simulating the chemical composition of Yamuna River in Northern India, was spiked with As(III) and tested with the developed sensor to evaluate sensor performance. To further validate the robustness of our electrode, the electrode was used to measure As(III) in synthetic wastewater, the recipe of which was modified from the literature [34] and listed in Table S1. In these experiments, a 10 mL water sample test solution composed of 9 mL simulated water and 1 mL 2 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0) was used for each measurement to ensure the pH 5.0 buffer condition with 0.2 M acetate.

3. Results and Discussion

In this work, we employ the concept of adsorbent-assisted stripping voltammetry analysis for sensitive detection of As(III) based on a sensing interface of AuNPs decorated with Fe3O4NPs (Fe3O4-Au). AuNPs have excellent catalytic properties and the Fe3O4NPs are highly adsorptive to As (III), which makes Fe3O4-Au a very promising material for the stripping voltammetry analysis of As(III). Additionally, ionic liquids (IL) have high adhesiveness, conductivity, work across a wide potential window, and have been widely used in the modification of electrodes [35,36,37,38,39,40]. Incorporating IL into the nanocomposite should further enhance the sensitivity and stability of the sensing interface on the electrode surface.
The synthesis method introduced in this work can be used as a new platform for synthesis of intact metal-Fe3O4 nanocomposites without the need for any linkers, which minimizes the distance between the metal and metal oxide nanoparticles and ensures the optimum combined effects between the materials. In this method, EG could provide magnetite with hydroxyl groups that facilitate the chelation of Au3+ ions (Fe3O4-Au3+), as illustrated in the schematic diagram of Figure 1. In this novel platform method, sodium citrate is a mild reducing and capping agent that can reduce gold ions slowly into AuNPs [41,42], while it will not reduce Fe3+/2+ in magnetite and hence it enables the synthesis of the Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite in situ without any linkers.

3.1. Physicochemical Characterization of Fe3O4-Au Nanocomposite

The introduced synthesis method is time saving (1–2 h), as the synthesis of magnetite NPs was conducted using the co-precipitation method. It is also linker-free with no barrier between gold and magnetite, which improves the electron transfer between them and enhances their combined effects. This procedure uses simple chemicals that are mostly ecofriendly, and very easy to wash using deionized water, if any excess is present. In addition, magnetite nanoparticles were prepared to be very tiny (≈10 nm) to allow for higher surface area and higher adsorption of As(III). The morphology and sizes of the prepared particles were assessed using SEM and TEM imaging as illustrated in Figure 2. The synthesized Fe3O4-Au suspension was drop-casted as a thin film on a piece of silicon wafer, at the same concentration and volume used in preparing the electrode materials, and sputtered with Pd/Pt to reduce surface charging, and then imaged by SEM. The SEM image in Figure 2a illustrates that AuNPs (the bigger and brighter particles) are surrounded by much smaller Fe3O4NPs. However, the Fe3O4NPs were not well resolved. Further imaging of Fe3O4-Au by TEM (Figure 2b) shows a 70 nm spherical core AuNP decorated with Fe3O4NPs, which agrees with the SEM image. The TEM image of Fe3O4NPs showed the particles are spherical with an average size of 10 ± 3 nm (Figure 2c,d). The TEM images confirm the success of the proposed platform, as the AuNPs and Fe3O4NPs are directly bound to each other without separation between them. Furthermore, EDX spectroscopy was implemented to calculate the actual weight ratio between Au and Fe in the prepared nanocomposite. The results in Supplementary Figure S1, determined that the weight ratio is approximately 5:1 (Au:Fe).
The results of the XRD analysis of magnetite (Fe3O4) NPs in Figure 3 show diffraction peaks at 30.17°, 35.53°, 43.27°, 56.96°, 62.69°, which can be assigned to the (220), (311), (400), (511), and (440) planes of the cubic inverse spinel-type structure of magnetite (PDF#85-1436) [43,44]. Moreover, the diffraction pattern of Fe3O4-Au has the same peaks of magnetite addressed above in addition to the characteristic peaks of the face-centered cubic (FCC) AuNPs at 38.23°, 44.54°, 64.71°, 77.69°, which can be assigned to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes, (Pattern 4-784) [45]. Hence, the XRD data confirm the successful synthesis of the Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite, without any change in the magnetite phase. Moreover, the intensity of AuNPs peaks is higher because they are in a higher concentration, which agrees with the EDS data, in which the weight ratio is around 5:1 (Au:Fe) (Figure S1). FTIR spectrum analysis (Figure 4) of Fe3O4NPs shows a broad peak centering at 3380 cm−1 and two peaks at 2900 and 2915 cm−1, which are attributed to the stretching vibrations of O-H and C-H groups from EG, respectively. In addition, Fe-O vibrations show two peaks at 1380 and 565 cm−1. Vibrational peaks of Fe3O4NPs are in a good agreement with published work [46]. On the other hand, the spectrum of AuNPs shows stretching vibrations of O-H groups of PVA at 3320 cm−1, vibrations of C=O groups of sodium citrate at 1730 cm−1 and stretching vibrations of C-H groups at 2900 and 2915 cm−1. The FTIR spectrum of Fe3O4-Au contains all the peaks from both spectra of Au and Fe3O4, which confirms the successful synthesis of this nanocomposite.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterizations of Modified Electrodes

The electrochemical characteristics of bare GCE and different modified GCEs, i.e., Fe3O4NPs/GCE, Fe3O4-Au/GCE, and Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE were investigated using CV based on a ferri/ferrocyanide [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− redox probe (Figure S2A). On the bare GCE, two well-defined redox peaks of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− were found in curve a. When compared to the bare GCE, Fe3O4NPs/GCE showed a decreased redox current of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4−, because of the poor conductivity of Fe3O4. However, stronger redox peaks were found with the Fe3O4-Au/GCE (curve c) compared to the Fe3O4NPs/GCE, due to the excellent electrical conductivity of the AuNPs. Furthermore, the addition of IL to the nanocomposite, i.e., Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE, increased its conductivity and resulted in stronger redox peaks.
EIS was used to explore the material/electrode interface properties and changes based on the impedance changes (Figure S2B). The EIS results show different semicircles, each with a diameter equivalent to the charge transfer resistance (Rct), which corresponds to the process of electron transfer limitation [47,48,49]. Based on the value of semicircle diameter, the order of the Rct of different modified electrodes was as follows: Fe3O4/GCE (curve b) > Fe3O4-Au/GCE (curve c) > Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE > bare GCE (curve a). The EIS results are consistent with those of CV.

3.3. Optimization of Analysis Parameters

Deposition potential and deposition time play a key role in the SWASV sensitivity (stripping peak current/concentration) of heavy metals detection. Additionally, Fe3O4NPs and AuNPs play a unique role in the dual-catalytic system for the SWASV detection of As(III). Therefore, in this study, responses of Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE toward As(III) were investigated to find optimal values of deposition potential, deposition time and the mass ratio of Fe3O4 to AuNPs. Figure 5A shows the influence of deposition potential on the stripping peak current of 20 ppb As(III) for 200 s deposition time and Fe:Au of 1:5. As shown in the figure, the stripping peak current increased with an increase of deposition potential reaching a maximum at −0.9 V followed by a small decrease at deposition potential above −0.9 V. The lower currents at potentials below −0.9 V are ascribed to incomplete reduction of As(III). On the other hand, the small decrease in current at deposition potentials above −0.9 V are the result of hydrogen evolution. Thus, the deposition potential of −0.9 V was chosen for As(III) preconcentration.
The effect of deposition time on the peak current of 20 ppb As(III) at −0.9 V deposition potential and Fe:Au of 1:5 is shown in the Figure 5B. The results show a monotonic increase in peak current as a function of deposition time. The direct relation between the current and deposition time suggests a lower LOD could be expected by increasing the deposition time. However, as a longer deposition time implies a longer analysis time, we selected a 200 s deposition period.
Different mass ratios of AuNPs to Fe3O4NPs in Fe3O4-Au composite on the stripping peak current of 50 ppb As(III) at −0.9 V deposition potential and 200 s deposition time were examined (Figure 5C). The results show an increase in the stripping peak current from 1.8 μA to ~6.6 μA when the Fe3O4-Au composite contained 10 to 16.3% (by mass) of Fe followed by a rapid drop to ~0.3 μA for 100% Fe (i.e., Fe3O4NPs only). This indicates a clear complementarity relationship between the two components of the nanocomposite in enhancing the sensitivity of the sensor for As(III) detection. It is interesting that although Fe3O4NPs have a strong adsorption capacity for the As(III), the response on Fe3O4NPs/GCE was the smallest. That may be ascribed to the poor conductivity of Fe3O4NPs, which affects both reduction of As(III) to As(0) and the oxidation of As(0) to As(III) on the electrode surface. Additionally, while the stripping response on AuNPs/GCE was higher than Fe3O4NPs/GCE, it was lower than Fe3O4-Au/GCE at different Fe mass ratios. This may be attributed to the combined effect of the strong adsorption capacity of Fe3O4 and good conductivity and catalytic ability of AuNPs. Based on cost and maximum sensitivity, Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite containing 16.3% (by mass) Fe was selected as the optimum composition.

3.4. Analytical Characteristics of Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE for As(III)

The stripping responses of 50 μg/L As(III) on bare GCE and different modified electrodes are shown in Figure 6. As shown in Figure 6A, almost no stripping response was obtained on the bare GCE. The stripping response of As(III) on Fe3O4NPs/GCE was not significant either, due to the poor conductivity of Fe3O4NPs. In contrast, at the Fe3O4-Au/GCE, a higher stripping peak signal was obtained due to the combined effect of Fe3O4NPs and AuNPs, which can be ascribed to the dual-catalysis system (Figure 6B). H2 was electrogenerated on the AuNP decorated with Fe3O4NPs at the applied negative potential during the electrodeposition step. The generated H2 then donates electrons in the reduction of As(III) to As(0), and forms H+ ions. Due to the strong adsorption capacity of Fe3O4NPs, As(III) concentration near the electrode surface gradually increased, which enhanced the catalytic efficiency of H2 on the As(III) adsorbed to Fe3O4NPs even at a high pH condition (the first catalytic system). Furthermore, the surface-activated Fe(II) can also donate an electron to form Fe(III), which helps reduce As(III). The produced Fe(III) will then acquire an electron, to revert to Fe(II), from either the electrode or the oxidation of As(0) to As(III) during the stripping process of SWASV. The procedure described above is a complete Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle. During this process, the electron transfer between electrode and As(III) was mediated by Fe(II), which was used as an electrocatalyst (the second catalytic system). This mediation of the Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle together with the catalysis of AuNPs will efficiently promote the deposition of As(III) and further enhance the sensitivity toward the electrochemical detection of As(III) [23,50]. Additionally, the stripping peak current was further improved with Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE due to the good conductivity and adhesiveness of IL.

3.4.1. Sensitivity, Limit of Detection, and Reproducibility

The Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE operating at optimal Fe:Au mass ratio, deposition potential, and deposition time determined above, was applied to analyze 0 to 100 ppb of As (III) in 0.2 M pH 5 acetate buffer (Figure 7). The results show well-defined Gaussian shaped response with peak current around 0 V which increased with increasing As(III) concentration (Figure 7A). As illustrated in Figure 7B, the peak stripping current, i.e., response, was linearly related to As(III) concentration over the complete concentration range of 0 to 100 ppb. The sensitivity (the slope of the calibration plot) was 0.122 mA/ppb As(III) and the LOD (calculated based on S/N = 3) was 0.22 ppb. The high sensitivity and low LOD is credited to the combined effects of excellent absorption ability for As(III), high electrical conductivity and good stability of AuNPs, Fe3O4 NPs and IL. Table S2 shows a comparison of this work to the previous literature in terms of electrode material, technique, linear range, and limit of detection.
Furthermore, the developed sensor demonstrated excellent reproducibility as evidenced by a very low (1.16%) relative standard deviation (RSD) for five repetitive measurements of 60 ppb As(III) (Figure S3).

3.4.2. Selectivity

Water sources contain a plethora of anions and cations that can potentially have a negative influence on the SWASV detection accuracy of As(III). We investigated the selectivity of the proposed sensor based on the analysis of 50 ppb of As(III) from 100-fold higher concentrations of Na+, K+, Ca2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ and Fe2+, and a 150-fold higher concentrations of Cl−, NO3−, SO42−, CO32−, F− and PO42−. As shown in Figure 8, there were no measurable changes in the peak current signals (current variation < ± 10%) in the presence of all the tested ions, confirming the proposed Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE is efficient in the detection of As(III) in the presence of non-target species in water.

3.5. Analysis of Simulated Water Samples

To evaluate the applicability of Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE for practical application, the sensor was applied to detect 5, 10 and 15 ppb of As(III) spiked in simulated river water representing the chemical composition of Yamuna River water in Northern India. Yamuna River is one of the most polluted rivers in India, and perhaps the world, with a complex matrix of pollutants [51,52]. As shown in Table 1, the recoveries (i.e., agreement) ranged from 97.2% to 101.3% (average of 99.06%) and the RSD ranged from 3.3% to 4.8% (average 3.9%). The excellent recoveries and low RSD demonstrate the promise of the developed sensor for monitoring As(III) in real environmental samples. To further validate Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE’s robustness in complex wastewater streams, we used the sensor to detect As(III) in synthetic wastewater samples containing high concentrations of humic acid (50 mg/L), and compared it with values measured using ICP-MS. The Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE sensor successfully determined As(III) concentrations, which were comparable to the results generated by ICP-MS (i.e., 95.4% ±4.7%) indicating that Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE is a robust electrode for detecting As(III) in complex water streams.

4. Conclusions

In this work, an effective sensitive interface was designed using AuNPs decorated with Fe3O4NPs embedded in IL for the determination of As(III) at a trace level based on adsorbent-assisted in-situ electrocatalysis. The procedure for Fe3O4-Au synthesis introduced in this work (1) produced very tiny (≈10 nm) Fe3O4NPs enhancing the surface area for As(III) adsorption, (2) did not use a linker between gold and magnetite, which enhanced their combined effects, (3) is a green chemistry approach and (4) greatly reduced synthesis time (1–2 h). The proposed Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE significantly enhanced the stripping response of As(III) as compared with the Fe3O4/GCE and AuNPs/GCE, as it provided a specific interface for As(III) to transfer electrons. Additionally, a Fe(II)/Fe(III) cycle and electrogenerated H2 were activated to catalyze the reduction/stripping of the As(III)/As(0), which enabled a high sensitivity. The presence of IL in the composite contributed to better sensitivity and stability. The analytical, spectroscopic and microscopic features of the proposed Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE characterization by XRD, EDX, TEM, SEM, EIS SWASV, and CV showed that the combined effect of AuNPs, Fe3O4 and IL resulted in a much better electrical conductivity, larger specific surface area and higher catalytic ability than the bare electrode. Moreover, several synthetic water samples were tested to further verify the practicability of the proposed platform. The results showed that Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE can be successfully applied to the analysis of As(III) in synthetic river and wastewater samples without any sample pretreatment procedures, which suggested that it could be further applied to heavy metal analysis in real samples.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/3/883/s1, Figure S1: EDX spectrum of the Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite, Figure S2: (A) Cyclic voltammograms and (B) Nyquist plot of electrochemical impedance spectra, Figure S3: Five repetitive stripping current measurements of 60 μg/L As(III) using the Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE in 0.2 M acetate buffer, Table S1: The composition of synthetic raw wastewater, Table S2: Comparison of different electrodes for the detection of As(III).

Author Contributions

M.S. was responsible for materials synthesis and characterization, writing of the materials synthesis and characterization sections, original draft preparation and the revision of the manuscript; G.Z. was responsible for sensor fabrication, electrochemical measurements and original draft preparation; S.M. prepared the wastewater samples and interpreted the results; A.M. and D.J. conceptualized the project, acquired the funding, supervised the work, participated in in design of the study and preparation of the original and revised manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Department of Energy under award number FE0030456 and the DST/Intel®/Indo-U.S. Science and Technology Forum grant RP03472.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

A.M. acknowledges the financial support of W. Ruel Johnson Chair. The authors acknowledge the use of ICP-MS core facility within the UC Center for Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology in CNSI at UCLA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Rodríguez-Lado, L.; Sun, G.; Berg, M.; Zhang, Q.; Xue, H.; Zheng, Q.; Johnson, C.A. Groundwater arsenic contamination throughout China. Science 2013, 341, 866–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Smith, A.; Lopipero, P.; Chung, J.; Haque, R.; Hernandez, A.; Moore, L.; Steinmaus, C. Arsenic in drinking water and cancer risks estimated from epidemiological studies in Argentina, Chile, Taiwan and Japan. Epidemiology 2000, 11, S93. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ning, Z.; Lobdell, D.T.; Kwok, R.K.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, S.; Ma, C.; Riediker, M.; Mumford, J.L. Residential exposure to drinking water arsenic in Inner Mongolia, China. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 222, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Feeney, R.; Kounaves, S.P. On-site analysis of arsenic in groundwater using a microfabricated gold ultramicroelectrode array. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 2222–2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tchounwou, P.B.; Patlolla, A.K.; Centeno, J.A. Invited reviews: Carcinogenic and systemic health effects associated with arsenic exposure—A critical review. Toxicol. Pathol. 2003, 31, 575–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shi, H.; Shi, X.; Liu, K.J. Oxidative mechanism of arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 255, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Melamed, D. Monitoring arsenic in the environment: A review of science and technologies with the potential for field measurements. Anal. Chim. Acta 2005, 532, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahman, M.R.; Okajima, T.; Ohsaka, T. Selective detection of As (III) at the Au (111)-like polycrystalline gold electrode. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 9169–9176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mays, D.E.; Hussam, A. Voltammetric methods for determination and speciation of inorganic arsenic in the environment—A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 646, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sengupta, M.K.; Sawalha, M.F.; Ohira, S.-I.; Idowu, A.D.; Dasgupta, P.K. Green analyzer for the measurement of total arsenic in drinking water: Electrochemical reduction of arsenate to arsine and gas phase chemiluminescence with ozone. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 3467–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zaib, M.; Athar, M.M.; Saeed, A.; Farooq, U. Electrochemical determination of inorganic mercury and arsenic—A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2015, 74, 895–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cai, Y. Speciation and analysis of mercury, arsenic, and selenium by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2000, 19, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Álvarez-Llamas, G.; del Rosario Fernández de laCampa, M.; Sanz-Medel, A. ICP-MS for specific detection in capillary electrophoresis. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2005, 24, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, N.; Fu, N.; Fang, Z.; Feng, Y.; Ke, L. Simultaneous multi-channel hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry determination of arsenic, bismuth, tellurium and selenium in tea leaves. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 1185–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Barek, J.; Peckova, K.; Vyskocil, V. Adsorptive stripping voltammetry of environmental carcinogens. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2008, 4, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Alves, G.M.S.; Magalhães, J.M.C.S.; Salaün, P.; Van den Berg, C.M.G.; Soares, H.M.V.M. Simultaneous electrochemical determination of arsenic, copper, lead and mercury in unpolluted fresh waters using a vibrating gold microwire electrode. Anal. Chim. Acta 2011, 703, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Castaneda, M.T.; Merkoçi, A.; Pumera, M.; Alegret, S. Electrochemical genosensors for biomedical applications based on gold nanoparticles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 22, 1961–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martínez-Paredes, G.; González-García, M.B.; Costa-García, A. Lead sensor using gold nanostructured screen-printed carbon electrodes as transducers. Electroanal. Int. J. Devoted Fundam. Pract. Asp. Electroanal. 2009, 21, 925–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Anker, J.N.; Hall, W.P.; Lyandres, O.; Shah, N.C.; Zhao, J.; Van Duyne, R.P. Biosensing with plasmonic nanosensors. Nanoscience and technology: A collection of reviews from nature journals. World Sci. 2010, 308–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Huang, J.; Chen, H. Heat-assisted electrodissolution of platinum in an ionic liquid. Angew. Chem. 2012, 124, 1716–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sasaki, K.; Naohara, H.; Cai, Y.; Choi, Y.M.; Liu, P.; Vukmirovic, M.B.; Wang, J.X.; Adzic, R.R. Core-protected platinum monolayer shell high-stability electrocatalysts for fuel-cell cathodes. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 8784–8789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Guo, S.; Wang, E. Noble metal nanomaterials: Controllable synthesis and application in fuel cells and analytical sensors. Nano Today 2011, 6, 240–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bu, L.; Gu, T.; Ma, Y.; Chen, C.; Tan, Y.; Xie, Q.; Yao, S. Enhanced cathodic preconcentration of As (0) at Au and Pt electrodes for anodic stripping voltammetry analysis of As (III) and As (V). J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 11400–11409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Majid, E.; Hrapovic, S.; Liu, Y.; Male, K.B.; Luong, J.H.T. Electrochemical determination of arsenite using a gold nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrode and flow analysis. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pungjunun, K.; Chaiyo, S.; Jantrahong, I.; Nantaphol, S.; Siangproh, W.; Chailapakul, O. Anodic stripping voltammetric determination of total arsenic using a gold nanoparticle-modified boron-doped diamond electrode on a paper-based device. Microchim. Acta 2018, 185, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hokkanen, S.; Repo, E.; Lou, S.; Sillanpää, M. Removal of arsenic (V) by magnetic nanoparticle activated microfibrillated cellulose. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chandra, V.; Park, J.; Chun, Y.; Lee, J.W.; Hwang, I.-C.; Kim, K.S. Water-dispersible magnetite-reduced graphene oxide composites for arsenic removal. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3979–3986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xie, Z.; Xu, J.; Xie, F.; Xiong, S. Electrochemical detection of As (III) by a rGO/Fe3O4-modified screen-printed carbon electrode. Anal. Sci. 2016, 32, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Devi, P.; Sharma, C.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, M.; Bansod, B.K.S.; Nayak, M.K.; Singla, M.L. Selective electrochemical sensing for arsenite using rGO/Fe3O4 nanocomposites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wei, J.; Li, S.-S.; Guo, Z.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.-H.; Huang, X.-J. Adsorbent assisted in situ electrocatalysis: An ultra-sensitive detection of As (III) in water at Fe3O4 nanosphere densely decorated with Au nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1154–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, S.-S.; Zhou, W.-Y.; Jiang, M.; Guo, Z.; Liu, J.-H.; Zhang, L.; Huang, X.-J. Surface Fe (II)/Fe (III) cycle promoted ultra-highly sensitive electrochemical sensing of arsenic (III) with dumbbell-like Au/Fe3O4 nanoparticles. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4569–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hassan, Y.; Chuang, C.-H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Coombs, N.; Gorantla, S.; Botton, G.A.; Winnik, M.A.; Burda, C.; Scholes, G.D. Synthesis and optical properties of linker-free TiO2/CdSe nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 3347–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sedki, M.; Khalil, I.A.; El-Sherbiny, I.M. Hybrid nanocarrier system for guiding and augmenting simvastatin cytotoxic activity against prostate cancer. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2018, 46, S641–S650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Yoo, H.; Ahn, K.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Lee, K.-H.; Kwak, Y.-J.; Song, K.-G. Nitrogen removal from synthetic wastewater by simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) via nitrite in an intermittently-aerated reactor. Water Res. 1999, 33, 145–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wei, D.; Ivaska, A. Applications of ionic liquids in electrochemical sensors. Anal. Chim. Acta 2008, 607, 126–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pandey, S. Analytical applications of room-temperature ionic liquids: A review of recent efforts. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 556, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rozniecka, E.; Shul, G.; Sirieix-Plenet, J.; Gaillon, L.; Opallo, M. Electroactive ceramic carbon electrode modified with ionic liquid. Electrochem. Commun. 2005, 7, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khani, H.; Rofouei, M.K.; Arab, P.; Gupta, V.K.; Vafaei, Z. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes-ionic liquid-carbon paste electrode as a super selectivity sensor: Application to potentiometric monitoring of mercury ion (II). J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 183, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xiong, S.-Q.; Wei, Y.; Guo, Z.; Chen, X.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.-H.; Huang, X.-J. Toward membrane-free amperometric gas sensors: An ionic liquid–nanoparticle composite approach. J. Phys. Chem. C 2011, 115, 17471–17478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Huang, X.-J.; Aldous, L.; O’Mahony, A.M.; del Campo, F.J.; Compton, R.G. Toward membrane-free amperometric gas sensors: A microelectrode array approach. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 5238–5245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Das, R.S.; Singh, B.; Mukhopadhyay, S.; Banerjee, R. Gold nano particles catalyzed oxidation of hydrazine by a metallo-superoxide complex: Experimental evidences for surface activity of gold nano particles. Dalt. Trans. 2012, 41, 4641–4648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Olesiak-Banska, J.; Gordel, M.; Kolkowski, R.; Matczyszyn, K.; Samoc, M. Third-order nonlinear optical properties of colloidal gold nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 13731–13737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, Y.; Yang, S.; Lu, X.; Duan, W.; Moriga, T. Synthesis and evaluation of the SERS effect of Fe3O4–Ag Janus composite materials for separable, highly sensitive substrates. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 2877–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Márquez, F.; Herrera, G.M.; Campo, T.; Cotto, M.; Ducongé, J.; Sanz, J.M.; Elizalde, E.; Perales, Ó.; Morant, C. Preparation of hollow magnetite microspheres and their applications as drugs carriers. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Krishnamurthy, S.; Esterle, A.; Sharma, N.C.; Sahi, S. V Yucca-derived synthesis of gold nanomaterial and their catalytic potential. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Van Quy, D.; Hieu, N.M.; Tra, P.T.; Nam, N.H.; Hai, N.H.; Thai Son, N.; Nghia, P.T.; Van Anh, N.T.; Hong, T.T.; Luong, N.H. Synthesis of silica-coated magnetic nanoparticles and application in the detection of pathogenic viruses. J. Nanomater. 2013, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Adams, D.M.; Brus, L.; Chidsey, C.E.D.; Creager, S.; Creutz, C.; Kagan, C.R.; Kamat, P.V.; Lieberman, M.; Lindsay, S.; Marcus, R.A. Charge transfer on the nanoscale: Current status. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 6668–6697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sedki, M.; Chen, X.; Chen, C.; Ge, X.; Mulchandani, A. Non-lytic M13 phage-based highly sensitive impedimetric cytosensor for detection of coliforms. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 148, 111794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhao, G.; Sedki, M.; Ma, S.; Villarreal, C.; Mulchandani, A.; Jassby, D. Bismuth subcarbonate decorated reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite for the sensitive stripping voltammetry analysis of Pb(II) and Cd(II) in water. Sensors 2020, 20, 6085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Renock, D.; Voorhis, J. Electrochemical investigation of arsenic redox processes on pyrite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 3733–3741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Misra, A.K. A river about to die: Yamuna. J. Water Resour. Prot. 2010, 2, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Malik, D.; Singh, S.; Thakur, J.; Singh, R.K.; Kaur, A.; Nijhawan, S. Heavy metal pollution of the Yamuna River: An introspection. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 856–863. [Google Scholar]
Sensors 21 00883 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic of Fe3O4-Au nanoparticle preparation and the suggested mechanism of its formation.
Figure 1. Schematic of Fe3O4-Au nanoparticle preparation and the suggested mechanism of its formation.
Sensors 21 00883 g001
Sensors 21 00883 g002 550
Figure 2. Electron microscopy images. (a) SEM image of a thin film of Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite on a silicon wafer sputtered with Pd/Pt, (b) a higher resolution TEM image of the prepared nanocomposite, and (c,d) TEM images of the Fe3O4NPs.
Figure 2. Electron microscopy images. (a) SEM image of a thin film of Fe3O4-Au nanocomposite on a silicon wafer sputtered with Pd/Pt, (b) a higher resolution TEM image of the prepared nanocomposite, and (c,d) TEM images of the Fe3O4NPs.
Sensors 21 00883 g002
Sensors 21 00883 g003 550
Figure 3. XRD patterns of Fe3O4NPs and Fe3O4-Au.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of Fe3O4NPs and Fe3O4-Au.
Sensors 21 00883 g003
Sensors 21 00883 g004 550
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 (red), Au (yellow), and Fe3O4-Au (blue).
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of Fe3O4 (red), Au (yellow), and Fe3O4-Au (blue).
Sensors 21 00883 g004
Sensors 21 00883 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Effect of the deposition potential, (B) deposition time and (C) weight ratio between Fe and Au on stripping current for 20 ppb (A,B) and 50 ppb (C) of As(III) in 0.2 M pH 5.5 acetate buffer at Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE. Each data point is an average of 5 measurements from 3 electrodes and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.
Figure 5. (A) Effect of the deposition potential, (B) deposition time and (C) weight ratio between Fe and Au on stripping current for 20 ppb (A,B) and 50 ppb (C) of As(III) in 0.2 M pH 5.5 acetate buffer at Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE. Each data point is an average of 5 measurements from 3 electrodes and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.
Sensors 21 00883 g005
Sensors 21 00883 g006 550
Figure 6. (A) The SWASV responses of 50 μg/L As(III) on different modified electrodes; (a) bare GCE, (b) Fe3O4NPs/GCE, (c) AuNPs/GCE, (d) Fe3O4-Au/GCE and (e) Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE. (B) The catalytic mechanism of Fe3O4-Au in the electroanalysis of As(III). Glassy carbon electrode (GCE); ionic liquid (IL).
Figure 6. (A) The SWASV responses of 50 μg/L As(III) on different modified electrodes; (a) bare GCE, (b) Fe3O4NPs/GCE, (c) AuNPs/GCE, (d) Fe3O4-Au/GCE and (e) Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE. (B) The catalytic mechanism of Fe3O4-Au in the electroanalysis of As(III). Glassy carbon electrode (GCE); ionic liquid (IL).
Sensors 21 00883 g006
Sensors 21 00883 g007 550
Figure 7. (A) SWAS voltammograms for additions of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 μg/L As(III). (B) The corresponding calibration curve of As(III).
Figure 7. (A) SWAS voltammograms for additions of 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 and 100 μg/L As(III). (B) The corresponding calibration curve of As(III).
Sensors 21 00883 g007
Sensors 21 00883 g008 550
Figure 8. The selectivity of the proposed sensor in the presence of high concentrations of different ions (A: Cation; B: Anion) on the stripping peak current of 50 μg/L As(III) at Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0). Each data point is an average of 5 measurements from 3 electrodes and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.
Figure 8. The selectivity of the proposed sensor in the presence of high concentrations of different ions (A: Cation; B: Anion) on the stripping peak current of 50 μg/L As(III) at Fe3O4-Au-IL/GCE in 0.2 M acetate buffer (pH 5.0). Each data point is an average of 5 measurements from 3 electrodes and error bars represent ±1 standard deviation.
Sensors 21 00883 g008
Table
Table 1. Detection of As(III) in simulated river water.
Table 1. Detection of As(III) in simulated river water.
Sample No.Found a (μg/L)Added (μg/L)Detected after Adding a (μg/L)Mean Recovery (%)RSD (%)
13.12 ± 1.0857.98 ± 1.2397.24.8
24.89 ± 0.891015.02 ± 1.15101.33.3
39.95 ± 0.961524.75 ± 0.9098.673.6
a Mean value ± Standard Deviation. Each data point is an average ±1 standard deviation from 3 measurements using 3 electrodes.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sedki, M.; Zhao, G.; Ma, S.; Jassby, D.; Mulchandani, A. Linker-Free Magnetite-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Au): Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III). Sensors 2021, 21, 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030883

AMA Style

Sedki M, Zhao G, Ma S, Jassby D, Mulchandani A. Linker-Free Magnetite-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Au): Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III). Sensors. 2021; 21(3):883. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030883

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sedki, Mohammed, Guo Zhao, Shengcun Ma, David Jassby, and Ashok Mulchandani. 2021. "Linker-Free Magnetite-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Au): Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III)" Sensors 21, no. 3: 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030883

APA Style

Sedki, M., Zhao, G., Ma, S., Jassby, D., & Mulchandani, A. (2021). Linker-Free Magnetite-Decorated Gold Nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Au): Synthesis, Characterization, and Application for Electrochemical Detection of Arsenic (III). Sensors, 21(3), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21030883

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop