Next Article in Journal
Blockchain Privacy and Scalability in a Decentralized Validated Energy Trading Context with Hyperledger Fabric
Previous Article in Journal
Synchrotron Radiation Study of Gain, Noise, and Collection Efficiency of GaAs SAM-APDs with Staircase Structure
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Interturn Short Fault Diagnosis Using Magnitude and Phase of Currents in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

Sensors 2022, 22(12), 4597; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124597
by Hyeyun Jeong, Hojin Lee, Seongyun Kim and Sang Woo Kim *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2022, 22(12), 4597; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124597
Submission received: 4 April 2022 / Revised: 8 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 17 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Fault Diagnosis & Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

the manuscript has a problem: how to collect current and phase? wish author detally explain test process. otherwise I feel your data is simulation.

 

Author Response

Thank you for your insightful comment.

We carefully revised it reflecting your comments.

We deeply appreciate your comments.

We attached the pdf file for the specific response.

We wish your affirmative decision on our revision.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

sensors-1689520

Slight Inter-turn Short Fault Diagnosis Only Based on Magnitude and Phase of Currents in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines

 

A fault indicator using magnitude and phase of currents is developed for detecting inter-turn short faults in permanent magnet synchronous machines. The fault indicator has been checked by numerical and experimental investigations. Generally, the work is good enough to be published. However, we have following questions:

1. Title should be revised and highlighted the main work you done. For example, ‘Inter-turn Short Fault Diagnosis Using Magnitude and Phase of Currents in Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machines’.

2. From the Abstract, it seems that ‘a novel fault indicator’ should be given in details.

3. For the ‘inter-turn short fault’, how to define ‘slight’?

4. If possible, could you kindly give more details about the influence of environmental noises?

Author Response

We deeply appreciate the reviewer's insightful comments that helped us improve the quality of our manuscript.

We carefully studied all your comments, and revised the manuscript.

We wish your affirmative decision on our revision.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

this version is OK, I have not any comments

Back to TopTop