Next Article in Journal
An Embedded Portable Lightweight Platform for Real-Time Early Smoke Detection
Next Article in Special Issue
Multi-Criteria Evaluation for Sorting Motion Planner Alternatives
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Flexible Sensors and Their Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of a Measurement Method and Test System for Pressure Change Rates in Commercial Vehicle Brake Chambers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 22
Issue 12
10.3390/s22124654
Review Report
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Conceptual Modeling of Extended Collision Warning System from the Perspective of Smart Product-Service System

Sensors 2022, 22(12), 4654; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124654
by Chunlong Wu 1,2,3,*, Hanyu Lv 1,2, Tianming Zhu 1,2, Yunhe Liu 1,2 and Marcus Vinicius Pereira Pessôa 4
Reviewer 1:
Cosmin Popa
Reviewer 2:
Tomasz Kisiel
Reviewer 3:
Noureddine Lakouari
Reviewer 4:
Chengcheng Tao
Sensors 2022, 22(12), 4654; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22124654
Submission received: 12 May 2022 / Revised: 7 June 2022 / Accepted: 9 June 2022 / Published: 20 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Fusion and Advanced Controller for Connected and Automated Vehicles)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I suggest a comparison of the results reported by the paper with the results of previous similar works.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper presents a conceptual modeling approach for extended CWS from the perspective of smart PSS.  The paper was written in a solid manner. The purpose of the paper its scope and scientific contributions are presented. A literature review has been conducted. The concept has also been supported with selected case studies. The authors have done a piece of solid work. For the future, the work can be improved by organizing it better. Some parts of the literature review have been included in the practical section (see the beginning of section 3.1.). This should have been included in the chapter related to the literature review. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The authors' paper's main contribution is to provide a new understanding of extended collision warning systems from an intelligent product-service systems perspective. The paper is well written and scientifically sound. I recommend the paper for publication in its present form. 

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The manuscript presents a conceptual model of the extended collision warning system. It was clearly presented and well organized. In Sections 2 and 3, there are only definitions or concepts. Are there any equations for different models? And what are the advantages and disadvantages of different models in the literature? In Section 4, validation or comparison with other researchers' studies is suggested. What is the difference between the case study results in this manuscript with previous research? What is the reason for the difference?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop