Next Article in Journal
Energy-Efficient Uplink Scheduling in Narrowband IoT
Next Article in Special Issue
Flow-Based Chemiluminescence Microarrays as Screening Platform for Affinity Binders to Capture and Elute Bacteria
Previous Article in Journal
Research on the Necessity of Lie Group Strapdown Inertial Integrated Navigation Error Model Based on Euler Angle
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Single Yeast Budding Using Impedance Cytometry with a Narrow Electrode Span

Sensors 2022, 22(20), 7743; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207743
by Xun Liu 1, Tao Tang 1,*, Po-Wei Yi 1,2, Yapeng Yuan 3, Cheng Lei 4, Ming Li 5, Yo Tanaka 3, Yoichiroh Hosokawa 1 and Yaxiaer Yalikun 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sensors 2022, 22(20), 7743; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22207743
Submission received: 29 August 2022 / Revised: 10 October 2022 / Accepted: 11 October 2022 / Published: 12 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Collection Microfluidic Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Attached file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

I have carefully reviewed your manuscript entitled “Identification of single yeast budding using impedance cytometry with a narrow electrode span” and it has impressed me. In my opinion, your work is innovative, relevant and sound. The manuscript is well written and organized and introduction and methodology let the reader have an idea of what you are researching and how do you proceed. Additionally, conclusions  are well supported by the results. So that, I can only congratulate you and suggest your manuscript for publication.

Nevertheless, please correct a couple of number-related typewriting errors in lines 258 (please write “show” instead of “shows”) and 285 (“differences” instead of “difference”)

Finally, I would like to encourage you to continue with your interesting research.

Best regards!!!

Author Response

Please see the attachment .

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Look the attachement

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment .

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The revised manuscript is suitable for publication.

Author Response

we appreciate your valuable contribution

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop