Next Article in Journal
Surface EMG Statistical and Performance Analysis of Targeted-Muscle-Reinnervated (TMR) Transhumeral Prosthesis Users in Home and Laboratory Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
Crack Growth Monitoring with Structure-Bonded Thin and Flexible Coils
Previous Article in Journal
Retinal OCTA Image Segmentation Based on Global Contrastive Learning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Acoustic Emission Source Characterisation during Fatigue Crack Growth in Al 2024-T3 Specimens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Nonlinear Soil Properties from Downhole Array Data Using a Bayesian Model Updating Approach

1
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
2
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557, USA
3
Texas Advanced Computing Center, Austin, TX 78758, USA
4
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(24), 9848; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249848
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 8 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 14 December 2022

Abstract

An accurate seismic response simulation of civil structures requires accounting for the nonlinear soil response behavior. This, in turn, requires understanding the nonlinear material behavior of in situ soils under earthquake excitations. System identification methods applied to data recorded during earthquakes provide an opportunity to identify the nonlinear material properties of in situ soils. In this study, we use a Bayesian inference framework for nonlinear model updating to estimate the nonlinear soil properties from recorded downhole array data. For this purpose, a one-dimensional finite element model of the geotechnical site with nonlinear soil material constitutive model is updated to estimate the parameters of the soil model as well as the input excitations, including incident, bedrock, or within motions. The seismic inversion method is first verified by using several synthetic case studies. It is then validated by using measurements from a centrifuge test and with data recorded at the Lotung experimental site in Taiwan. The site inversion method is then applied to the Benicia–Martinez geotechnical array in California, using the seismic data recorded during the 2014 South Napa earthquake. The results show the promising application of the proposed seismic inversion approach using Bayesian model updating to identify the nonlinear material parameters of in situ soil by using recorded downhole array data.
Keywords: nonlinear soil properties; geotechnical arrays; Bayesian estimation; earthquake data; inverse problem nonlinear soil properties; geotechnical arrays; Bayesian estimation; earthquake data; inverse problem

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ghahari, F.; Abazarsa, F.; Ebrahimian, H.; Zhang, W.; Arduino, P.; Taciroglu, E. Identification of Nonlinear Soil Properties from Downhole Array Data Using a Bayesian Model Updating Approach. Sensors 2022, 22, 9848. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249848

AMA Style

Ghahari F, Abazarsa F, Ebrahimian H, Zhang W, Arduino P, Taciroglu E. Identification of Nonlinear Soil Properties from Downhole Array Data Using a Bayesian Model Updating Approach. Sensors. 2022; 22(24):9848. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ghahari, Farid, Fariba Abazarsa, Hamed Ebrahimian, Wenyang Zhang, Pedro Arduino, and Ertugrul Taciroglu. 2022. "Identification of Nonlinear Soil Properties from Downhole Array Data Using a Bayesian Model Updating Approach" Sensors 22, no. 24: 9848. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249848

APA Style

Ghahari, F., Abazarsa, F., Ebrahimian, H., Zhang, W., Arduino, P., & Taciroglu, E. (2022). Identification of Nonlinear Soil Properties from Downhole Array Data Using a Bayesian Model Updating Approach. Sensors, 22(24), 9848. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop