Next Article in Journal
Non-Steady State NMR Effect and Application on Time-Varying Magnetic Field Measurement
Next Article in Special Issue
Readout IC Architectures and Strategies for Uncooled Micro-Bolometers Infrared Focal Plane Arrays: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Dual Wavelength Photoplethysmography Framework for Heart Rate Calculation
Previous Article in Special Issue
State of the Art Techniques for Water Quality Monitoring Systems for Fish Ponds Using IoT and Underwater Sensors: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Application of Biosensors, Sensors, and Tags in Intelligent Packaging Used for Food Products—A Review

by
Emilia Osmólska
1,
Monika Stoma
1,* and
Agnieszka Starek-Wójcicka
2
1
Department of Power Engineering and Transportation, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
2
Department of Biological Bases of Food and Feed Technologies, Faculty of Production Engineering, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 20-612 Lublin, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(24), 9956; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249956
Submission received: 21 November 2022 / Revised: 8 December 2022 / Accepted: 15 December 2022 / Published: 17 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Review Papers in Sensors and Sensing Technologies)

Abstract

:
The current development of science and the contemporary market, combined with high demands from consumers, force manufacturers and scientists to implement new solutions in various industries, including the packaging industry. The emergence of new solutions in the field of intelligent packaging has provided an opportunity to extend the quality of food products and ensures that food will not cause any harm to the consumer’s health. Due to physical, chemical, or biological factors, the state of food may be subject to degradation. The degradation may occur because the packaging, i.e., the protective element of food products, may be damaged during storage, transport, or other logistic and sales activities. This is especially important since most food products are highly perishable, and the maintenance of the quality of a food product is the most critical issue in the entire supply chain. Given the importance of the topic, the main purpose of this article was to provide a general overview of the application of biosensors, sensors, and tags in intelligent packaging used for food products. A short history and the genesis of intelligent packaging are presented, and the individual possibilities of application of sensors, biosensors, gas sensors, and RFID tags, as well as nanotechnology, in the area of the packaging of food products are characterized.

1. Introduction

The globalization and dynamics of the contemporary market, together with the excessive consumer expectations and preferences regarding safety (health and environmental) and product quality on the one hand and the stricter consumer law on the other hand, has led to the intensification of work on innovative concepts of packaging technologies and materials. In this regard, the safety of food products, understood as appropriate physical and sensory characteristics, microbiological safety, chemical composition, and nutritional value of the product, seems to be particularly important. It is known that many processes occur in raw materials, causing changes in their chemical composition and physical properties [1,2].
It should also be remembered that the consumer makes his choices based on perception and sensory expectations. Hence, in the case of inadequate freshness, smell, or appearance and other sensory characteristics, the consumer may reject such a product. It is known that many food products undergo various biological, chemical, or physical processes that ultimately lead to product spoilage [3]. Ecological aspects are equally important, as modern consumers are characterized by an increasing level of awareness, especially in the area of environmental protection and reducing food waste.
The deterioration of the condition of food resulting either from physical or chemical changes in the food itself or from the action of microorganisms may occur gradually during storage, transport, or other logistic and sales activities. Hence, it seems extremely important to constantly monitor certain qualitative features of the product during its transport and storage throughout the entire production and logistics chain. This is especially important since most food products are highly perishable, and the maintenance of the quality of a food product is the most critical issue in the entire supply chain [4]. It should be added that the aforementioned changes are difficult to estimate by consumers, especially in relation to packaged food. Moreover, often even a slight deviation from the norm, e.g., in relation to the color or consistency, results in discarding the product.
Therefore, packaging manufacturers have initiated activities aimed at creating so-called sustainable packaging, i.e., a product that is safe throughout its life cycle and is manufactured and recycled or biodegraded in a way that is beneficial for the natural environment. More specifically, packaging should support sustainable food management, i.e., solve the problem of food waste by preserving the quality of food products while ensuring their safety (preventing food-borne diseases and reducing the use of artificial additives) [5,6]. Modern packaging systems, including intelligent packaging, help to achieve this goal. They differ from traditional packaging in the ability to monitor and indicate the condition of products without having to comply with estimated expiry dates. It is a very practical solution in the case of food, medicines, or dangerous goods.
With regard to the food sector, the concept of intelligent packaging has also been developed, inter alia, to limit the destruction of food samples related to microbiological and chemical analyses and to modify the approach to a new dimension of food analysis [7]. On the other hand, the reasons for the growing importance of intelligent packaging in consumer purchasing decisions include deconsumption (i.e., limiting the amount of consumption in favor of its quality), lifestyle changes, constant striving to improve the quality of life, and the desire to protect the natural environment. In 2015, Tu et al. proved that the physical properties and improved aspect of food packaging containment are expectations that affect product sales and consumer attitudes [8]. Some even believe that the creation of “smart” packaging is a consequence of the introduction of intelligent technologies in most spheres of our lives: today most of the surrounding objects (cars, telephones, television, refrigerators, etc.) are or are to be smart in the near future.
Intelligent packaging performs all the functions characteristic of conventional packaging on the one hand (above all, it protects the packed product); on the other hand, it can also acquire and process data. Hence, it protects goods even better and thus contributes to a positive consumer experience by, e.g., informing the consumer about the state of the environment of the packaged food. The idea of intelligent packaging is mainly manifested in the possibility of controling and measuring certain characteristics of the packaged food product [9].
It should be added that the terms “intelligent packaging” or “smart packaging” are very often used interchangeably. However, they do not mean the same thing. Obviously, these two terms refer to packaging systems used in the food, pharmaceutical, or cosmetics industries, as well as the packaging of other products that are quickly degraded, but it is important to note the differences between these types of packaging. In addition, active packaging can be distinguished among the packaging systems.
Intelligent packaging comprises all materials and products that are able to control/monitor changes taking place inside the packaged food. What is very important is that they provide information about the conditions of the packaged product but do not directly affect the packaged food. The main task of such packaging is to capture and provide data on changes in the quality of packed goods during transport and storage [10,11]. Another type of packaging systems are active packaging, which—through the content of various additives or substances—exert a positive effect on the extension of the quality and shelf life of a given food product. Nevertheless, these systems do not inform the consumer or the producer about changes taking place inside, unlike intelligent packaging. Therefore, active packaging plays a different role than providing an inert barrier to the external environment [12,13], whereas smart packaging is a combination of intelligent packaging and active packaging. Smart packaging has elements characteristic of intelligent packaging (it monitors changes) and active packaging (it influences these changes). What is more, smart packaging is able to provide comprehensive solutions in case of changes in the product [14,15]. This review presents information about one of the packaging systems, namely—intelligent packaging.
Intelligent packaging systems work in two main ways. The first is data carriers, i.e., various types of barcode labels or radio-frequency identification tags for storing and transmitting data. In turn, the second type of intelligent packaging is characterized by the presence of indicators or sensors in the packaging, which allow the monitoring of the external environment [7].
In contrast, Sohail [9] proposes a structure of an intelligent packaging system, as shown in Table 1, and concludes that there are three main types of tools used for intelligent packaging, namely:
  • sensors, mainly including:
    • gas sensors—devices monitoring changes in the composition of gases inside the package;
    • fluorescence oxygen sensors—detecting spoilage of the product, determining freshness of the product,
    • biosensors;
  • indicators—interactive indicators located outside or inside the package, which change their color and color intensity or expose dye dispersion under the influence of changes in the conditions prevailing in the package. In this way, they provide the consumer with qualitative or semi-quantitative information regarding the quality, freshness, and other parameters of the packaged product [16,17]:
    • time-temperature indicators—devices in the form of various types of stickers/labels attached to the outside of collective or individual packaging, recording even short-term thermal changes in the environment (an increase or a decrease in temperature beyond the limit acceptable for a given product) during the storage, transport, and distribution of food. TTIs can be based either on controlling physical changes or chemical reactions (e.g., melting, polymerization) or on changes in biological activity (microbes, spores, enzymes). These types of indicators are used primarily in the case of frozen products and chilled food, as well as in the packaging of semi-finished products intended for preparation in microwave ovens or ovens [16,18],
    • gas leakage/concentration indicators—devices used to control the tightness of packaging by detecting carbon dioxide without violating the integrity of the packaging material—a gas leak in the packaging may cause favorable conditions for the development of microorganisms,
    • microbial growth indicators reacting with microbial metabolites, which helps to observe the possible growth of microorganisms in the packed product,
    • freshness indicators—determining freshness by showing different colors or color changes. They provide direct information on product quality resulting from microbial growth or chemical changes in the food product. The microbiological quality can be determined by the reactions between the indicators contained inside the package and the metabolites of microbial growth, e.g., organic acids, ethanol, volatile nitrogen, biogenic amines, carbon dioxide, glucose, and sulfur compounds [19,20];
  • barcodes and radio-frequency identification (RFID) devices—devices that detect and identify a product in the supply chain by radio signal modulation.
Han et al. [21] indicate three main groups of tools used in intelligent packaging, based on the work of other authors [22,23]:
  • external indicators—attached to the outside of the package; they mainly include time-temperature indices and physical shock indices;
  • internal indicators—placed inside the package (in the upper part of the package or attached to the lid), e.g., oxygen leakage rates, carbon dioxide, microbial and pathogen indicators;
  • indicators facilitating a more effective process of information flow and communication of the packaged product with its consumer—special barcodes (storing information about food products, such as the use and expiry date, and enabling product traceability) and anti-theft, anti-counterfeiting, and anti-tampering devices.
Regardless of the technology used, however, the purpose of all such packaging systems is to provide the customer and the brand with the best experience and full control over the quality of the product. The sensors are able to track a wide range of indicators and thus provide customers and brands with valuable information on the basis of which it will be possible to make the right decisions: both consumer and strategic ones. It should also be mentioned that, in the future, this type of packaging may be one of the solutions in the field of the industrial internet of things (IIoT) by connecting to a network to share data on the condition of articles using sensors and software.
There are many publications available in the literature on various aspects and concepts of intelligent packaging systems, including the possibility of their application for various products. The research conducted by Vanderroost et al. [24], Ghaani et al. [20], Beshai et al. [25], and Chelliah et al. [26], who reviewed the solutions, features, and market potential of various types of intelligent appliances, including indicators, sensors, or RFID tags and barcodes, should be mentioned here. Other authors focused their deliberations on the application of the concept of intelligent packaging systems for specific types of food products: meat [16,18,19,27,28,29,30,31,32,33], fish and seafood [28,34,35,36,37,38,39,40], milk and dairy products [41,42,43,44,45,46], fruits and vegetables [47,48,49,50], juices [51,52], cheese [53], other fresh products [54], or chilled and frozen food products [55].
Hence, this article attempts to review modern solutions used in intelligent packaging in the context of their usefulness for various food products. The main focus was placed on tools based on sensors and biosensors, as well as RFID tags, as it is believed that these solutions may be most often used in intelligent packaging systems in the coming years.
Therefore, the purpose of this review is to determine the state of knowledge of the latest technological developments in the field of intelligent packaging systems in relation to food products, which are used primarily to maintain an appropriate level of quality and safety of protected goods. It also presents various concepts, classifications, and tools used in these systems for management of the supply chain of various foodstuffs.
The article is divided into the following sections: (2) genesis and essence of intelligent packaging, (3) intelligent packaging based on sensors, (4) intelligent packaging based on biosensors, (5) RFID—radio frequency identification systems, (6) hybrid intelligent packaging systems (7) application of nanotechnology in intelligent packaging systems. Finally, Section 8 presents the conclusions of the analyses in the form of challenges and perspectives regarding intelligent packaging systems.

2. The Genesis and Essence of Intelligent Packaging

The first proposals for intelligent packaging appeared almost 50 years ago, first on the Japanese market. Only 20 years later—in the 1990s—other markets, mainly European and American, became interested in these systems. More intensive development in this area in the European Union countries could be observed only after the entry into force of the framework regulation of the European Parliament and of Council No. 1935 of 2004 [56]. It should be added that, in the first years of functioning, intelligent packaging was mainly used in the pharmaceutical industry and then also found application in the food industry [57,58]. It is also important that there was no legal framework for intelligent packaging in the EU for many years. Moreover, due to the stricter EU law, US intelligent packaging systems cannot be easily introduced to Europe [59].
Initially, intelligent packaging was defined as a type of packaging that could sense and inform users about environmental changes [60]. A few years later, Han, Ho, and Rodrigues [21] divided intelligent packaging into two categories: simple intelligent packaging and interactive or responsive packaging. There were also other definitions that pointed out in particular that such packaging systems contain various types of devices and sensors that are capable of detecting and providing information about the functions and properties of the packaged food, e.g., informing consumers that a product is damaged [21,61] and/or include an external or internal indicator for active product history and quality determination [62].
On 29 May 2009, the Commission Regulation (EC) No. 450/2009 was published to regulate the issues related to the safety of the use of active packaging materials [63]. It defines intelligent packaging as “materials and products that monitor the condition of packaged food or its environment”, which means that their main purpose and task is to provide the consumer with reliable information about the conditions in which a given food is stored. The regulation also defines the specific requirements for the market circulation of active and intelligent materials, as well as materials intended to come into contact with food [64]. Packaging is in direct contact with the food it protects. Therefore, all materials and products must be controlled in terms of their safety, as substances contained therein can migrate inside the food [65].
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) supervises food safety by accepting and publishing scientific opinions. The threat that may occur in the area of quality and safety of substances used or intended for the production of materials that come into direct contact with food is carefully assessed. EFSA also analyzes safety in the context of related packaging production processes, e.g., the recycling of plastics. In addition, EFSA publishes several papers or protocols each year that allow the assessment of consumer health risks [66,67].
Regarding the aforementioned Regulation EC 450/2009, it should be added that it contains an updated list of substances that are safe for the production of such packaging. The list is available for all European Union countries. EFSA’s Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavorings, and Processing Aids (CEF) acts as a supervisor in this context, i.e., it analyzes all substances on the list. These substances are added to the list only after their safety has been assessed [68,69].
Contemporary literature offers many different definitions of intelligent packaging. As reported by Bagchi and He [7], intelligent packaging is defined as a packaging system that is capable of performing intelligent functions to facilitate decisions leading to an extension of shelf-life, increasing safety, improving quality, providing information, and warning about possible problems. Among these functions, the authors mention detecting, sensing, recording, tracing, communicating, and applying scientific logic.
In turn, as suggested by Yam et al. [70], the role of intelligent packaging is to facilitate communication throughout the supply chain, to facilitate the recording of changes in the internal and external environment, and to inform users about the condition of packaged food products, so that appropriate actions can be taken to achieve the desired benefits in terms of improving food quality and safety. They add that this is done by small labels or tags that are attached to the primary packaging (e.g., pouches, trays, and bottles) or more commonly to the secondary packaging (e.g., shipping containers).
Yet another definition is given by Brockgreitens, i.e., “IP is any type of container that provides a specific functionality beyond the function of a physical barrier between the food product and the surrounding environment”. In turn, Biji states that IP are packaging technologies, which, using internal and external indicators, monitor the interaction between food, packaging, and the environment. He also adds that the knowledge of product quality, packaging, or the environment is extremely important, as it forms the basis of the bond of responsibility throughout the entire food supply chain (storage, transport, distribution, and sales).
Intelligent packaging has the ability to monitor specific parameters (internal and/or external product environment); these systems are therefore able to provide consumers with certain information about the packaged product, without having to open the package itself. This information is mainly related to quality and safety and may indicate changes and irregularities, e.g., in temperature, oxygen, or carbon dioxide content occurring during the storage and distribution of food [9]. Importantly, even the most processed food is still a biologically active system: it oxidizes, gives off gas, and changes color or humidity [10]. This is possible by placing appropriate interactive indicators outside or inside the package. They occur mainly in the form of color indicators that change their color under the influence of changes in the conditions prevailing in the packaging. However, it should be remembered that they should not come into direct contact or interact with food [11,71].
The statement that intelligent packaging is a system that can monitor the quality/safety status of a food product and provide an early warning to the consumer or food producer seems to be common to all definitions. Its main goal is therefore to improve the efficiency of transport and to ensure control and secure transported goods. On the other hand, a secondary goal may be to support marketing or logistic activities. Therefore, increasing numbers of companies are introducing new solutions in the field of intelligent packaging to the market.
It seems that intelligent packaging is very useful for both industry and consumers, especially in terms of quality assurance and food safety. The sensors or devices on the packaging that are able to share relevant information from the packaging system provide up-to-date information on the condition of the food. Intelligent packaging can also often provide its users with certain information about the process of the production, distribution, and storage of the food product and about its ingredients and properties [7,9]. In addition, it gives the opportunity to control the quality characteristics of packaged food. It should be added that the constant monitoring not only reduces food waste but also protects consumers against potential food poisoning; in addition, attention should be paid by businesses to maximization of the efficiency of the food industry and the improvement of traceability [10,72].
Hence, it seems that intelligent packaging systems have great potential and should be used on a large scale to improve product safety and reduce the negative impact on the environment on the one hand and increase the attractiveness of the packaged product and food industry companies on the other hand.

3. Intelligent Packaging Based on Sensors

A sensor is an instrument that detects, locates, or determines events or changes in the surrounding environment and then transmits signals to measure physical or chemical parameters. Generally, sensors are composed of a receptor (whose function is to transform physical or chemical information into a form of energy) and a transmitter (which converts the energy into an analytical chemical, optical, electrical, or thermal signal) [54,73]. On the other hand, intelligent sensors or smart sensors are equipped with dedicated signal processing functions in order to increase the flexibility of designing sensor devices and to implement new detection functions [74].
With the current development of science, there are many structures on which the functioning of sensors is based with great potential for use in intelligent packaging.
Devices based on a chemical sensor operate on the principle of transforming the chemical information flowing from the environment into an operative measurement signal. A characteristic feature of chemical sensors is their ability to selectively capture a substance or an ion. The analytical signal is formed from the adsorption of the actual analyte in the recognition layer. Energy conversion is combined with analyte detection, resulting in a change in receptor properties in terms of redox potential, pH, temperature, or light [20]. Moreover, chemical sensors react to the selected analyte through a reversible chemical interaction, which facilitates its qualitative and quantitative determination [20]. Thus, they are the best alternative to time-consuming analytical instruments like gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), which can be used only by compromising the integrity of the food package [20].
There are two common chemical elements of the sensor action. One of them, i.e., the receptor (the sensing part) selectively capturing a given factor in the area where a chemical reaction takes place, and the other is the converter, i.e., the transduction part. The converter helps in converting one form of energy into another and transferring the detail into an analytical signal. The emerging chemical reaction generates a signal manifested as a color change, fluorescence, heat release, or a change in the frequency of the crystal oscillator [20,75].
As suggested by Hanrahan et al. [76], an ideal sensor should have five main attributes: (1) selectivity or specificity to the target species; (2) vulnerability to changes in target species concentrations; (3) quick reaction time; (4) prolonged shelf life, at least a couple of months; and (5) compact dimensions, with the capability for cheap production.
There are various types of sensors that test different parameters. One of their divisions is presented in Figure 1.
In addition, to ensure the highest possible level of food safety, sensors that measure oxygen and carbon dioxide (gas sensors), pH change, humidity, time, temperature, specific chemicals such as TVBN, chemical array, or bacteria deserve special attention. These indicators represent the physical and nutritional status of the food, which is a key element illustrating its quality and edibility [77].
Several factors that are measured in intelligent packaging are characterized below in order to determine whether the product has retained its quality features and safety level.

3.1. Sensors Based on Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide

Among the most common solutions in the field of intelligent packaging systems based on sensors, one should undoubtedly mention gas sensors, as the deterioration of food products is identified on the basis of emitted gases, such as CO2 or H2S.
Gas sensors are used to monitor changes in a package caused by various external stimuli (e.g., environmental conditions). Very often, such devices are able to determine the effectiveness of the active ingredients in the packaging, the so-called O2 and CO2 scavengers [78]. Gas sensors react quantitatively. Due to their transient state, the presence of gas can be detected by changes in the physical parameters of the sensor [10].
Carbon dioxide is known for its antimicrobial action against certain selected microorganisms; therefore, it is very often used in packages with modified atmosphere. The use of such a solution helps to extend the shelf-life of the product [79]. It is also worth noting that some materials are more permeable to CO2 than oxygen; consequently, this gas is dissolved in food. Thus, a very important device to stop these unwanted effects is the carbon dioxide generator, which helps to stabilize the concentration of this compound and prevents the deformation of the package [80].
CO2 sensors are mainly based on non-dispersive infrared. However, they can be sensors operating on the principle of chemical transformations as well. Very importantly, NDIR sensors collect measurements of CO2 content by means of the absorption of the gas at a certain wavelength, which makes them spectroscopic sensors. Chemical sensors that monitor CO2 levels function by working with polymeric or solid electrolytes. In contrast, infrared sensors are used to detect O2, as well as systems based on ultrasonic, laser, or electrochemical transformations [81,82].
The quickest and easiest way to observe changes in packaging is to use redox-based colorimetric indicators. The compounds used in such indicators are sodium or potassium hydroxide. To detect the presence of oxygen, which is responsible for the microbial spoilage of food, a colorimetric indicator using methylene blue and a reducing agent is used (e.g., glucose) [83,84].
Gas sensors include amperometric oxygen sensors, potentiometric CO2 sensors, semiconductor metal oxide transistors, piezoelectric crystal sensors, and organic conductive polymers [10,19].
However, it should be remembered that the reducing agent is susceptible to the action of oxygen, and therefore these indicators must be kept in anaerobic conditions to prevent undesirable reactions that may consequently cause the indicator to malfunction. The questionable safety of a food product packed in a package with such a sensor may also be a big problem. Particular attention should be paid to the accidental contamination of food with a harmful synthetic component of the sensor [42].

3.2. Sensors Based on pH Changes and Specific Chemicals

Changes in pH and the formation of specific chemical compounds, often harmful to humans, are associated with the development of pathogenic microorganisms that cause food spoilage. A similar scheme of operation as in the case of O2 and CO2, i.e., colorimetric tests, are used in the process of controlling changes in pH and the formation of specific chemical compounds. Such tests are most often built into the packaging, so that the user can observe the changes in a simple and quick way.
An interesting solution seems to be the polyaniline foil indicators designed for perishable fish by Kuswadi et al. [85]. The scientists have created a packaging that changes color in response to the appearance of amine compounds as a result of deteriorating food quality.
To detect changes in pH, electrochemical sensors are very often used, the operation of which is based on the redox reaction on the electrode surface. It releases an electrical signal that is able to detect volatile amine compounds formed during food oxidation. This is especially helpful for animal products, including meat and fish [86,87].
Bhadra et al. [40] constructed a passive pH sensor covered with a special hydrogel facilitating the determination of the concentration of volatile compounds. The entire device uses the effect of a resonance frequency, which changes depending on the concentration of volatile amines appearing in a given environment. Any changes in the above-mentioned parameter can be detected by controlling the impedance of the outer coil coupled to the sensor.
One of the main advantages of such sensors is the speed and sensitivity of decay process detection; moreover, these sensors provide very important information regarding the concentration of the measured harmful compound. Additionally, they are more advanced than classic colorimetric tests. Some disadvantages appear already when such a system is implemented in packaging systems, as it is much more complicated than color measurement [20].

3.3. Sensors Based on Humidity

Food moisture can often be a major problem for ensuring food quality and safety throughout the supply chain. Products such as meat, fish, fruit, and vegetables are characterized by high water activity and therefore often lose moisture and become dry [88]. On the other hand, products with low water activity usually absorb moisture from the environment, which results in the deterioration of their quality, including organoleptic characteristics [87].
Hence, it is advisable to control the humidity level inside the package in real time. Various approaches are currently being used to monitor this parameter; these include measurements of changes in the dielectric properties, capacitance, and resonant frequency of crystals. Protein, which is sensitive to humidity, is very often used for intelligent packaging that measures humidity.
An example of such packaging is nanocomposite foil, which has a layer based on gelatin due to its dielectric properties; additionally, this foil has a ZnO layer, which is intended to detect the signal [86,89].
Bibi et al. [90] used wheat gluten to detect changes in relative humidity in packages. The principle of operation is very similar to that of the nanocomposite foil, i.e., gluten was used due to its dielectric properties.
Intelligent packaging also very often uses sensors that are placed inside the materials used for their production. The interlayer electrode (IDE) acts as an induction layer in packages made of biodegradable materials. The ambient relative humidity function defines the capacitance between electrodes. It should be added that the dielectric constant intensifies with the absorption of moisture from the atmosphere [91]. Besides, the increase in humidity inside the package makes the specially designed layer (usually inductive) absorb the vapor with water. A result of this process is the modified capacitance of the capacitor and resonant frequency. A composite of starch and polypropylene (PP), glossy photo paper, polyvinyl alcohol, polylactic acid (PLA), and planarized polyethylene terephthalate (PET) are used to manufacture this type of sensor [92].
Moisture-prone products are a special case wherein intelligent packaging has a wide range of applications. They are especially useful for dried products such as flakes, powders, and cereals, as well as salty and sweet snacks, as the water activity in this type of product is much higher, and thus their quality characteristics may deteriorate.

3.4. Sensors Based on Time and Temperature (TTI)

Temperature and time are two very important factors for food freshness, safety, and quality. Most food products have an assigned use-by date and storage conditions (refrigerated, room temperature). It is also very difficult to determine whether a given product has been stored properly [93]. Temperature is a key element affecting practically all quality parameters; therefore, it is very important to monitor it and to react in crisis situations. Time-temperature sensors allow the real-time batch control of consumer products throughout the supply chain [94].
For example, Evigence Sensors Inc, based in the United States, has time-temperature sensors for sale. The company ensures that their TTIs are relatively cheap and automatically activated, so they can be used on production lines, they have a visual and digital indicator, which makes it easier to read (e.g., using a smartphone), and most importantly, they are not susceptible to degradation due to exposure to the sun or UV radiation.
The methodology of the TTI sensor operation is based on some kind of reactions taking place between two or more substrates, which results in a peremptory color of the indicator as a result of the dominant reaction [95].
Nowadays, TTI can be divided into several varieties according to the nature of the reaction. These include:
chemical TTIs working by polymerizing 1,4-additive monomers under the influence of high temperature. In this way, polydiacetylene compounds (PDAs) are formed. It is very important that this reaction is irreversible, and the rate of reaction will be proportional to the subsequent increase in temperature. Additionally, they are also based on photoluminescence by the principle of thermally induced decay in the reverse reaction of photoluminescent compounds. The reaction process will depend on the increase in time and temperature, as a result of which the degree of the fading of the indicator will be visible on the package [94];
physical TTIs; their operating principle is based on diffusion, nanoparticles, and electrons. Corresponding changes are created depending on the reaction temperature or the solid-to-liquid transition temperature. Thanks to these dependencies, the color of the indicator changes. While absorbing heat, a sensor based on the use of nanoparticles with thermochromic properties changes the surface of metal nanoparticles (Ag NPs/Au NPs), as a result of which the wavenumber migrates to the visible surface, thereby changing the color [96];
enzymatic TTIs use the hydrolysis reaction between the enzyme and the substrate in the indicator, which yields the appropriate color. Depending on time and temperature, the enzymatic reaction becomes more intense, revealing a color consistent with the intensity of the exposure to these two factors. Given such indicators, it is possible to control various types of food depending on the selected enzymes, substrates, activators, or inhibitors [97];
microbial TTIs base their action on metabolites produced by microorganisms in appropriate environmental conditions (according to time and temperature) to change the indicator element. Nowadays, yeast or lactic acid bacteria are most often used due to the anaerobic acid production. This results in a color change in the indicator [94].
There is a growing body of information about TTI indicators composed of self-generating materials. For example, Choi et al. [98] created an elastic fiber from aromatic disulfide based on thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). This nanofiber is opaque and becomes transparent with time and changes in temperature. Additionally, the built-in display facilitates temperature control. In addition, this material has high resistance to mechanical effects.

3.5. Characteristics of Optical Sensors and Others

Optical sensors are becoming an increasingly frequent subject of research due to their great potential to be use in food packaging. Such sensors have been proved to be less expensive than others. Very importantly, they do not need electronic connections and additional devices to function properly.
Besides, they can be used by untrained operators. The principle of their operation is mainly based on the following systems: photonic structures and plasmonic particles, fluorogenic receptors, or simply a colorimetric test [99].
Examples of sensors that are used in intelligent packaging systems include those already described by Baleizao et al. [100]. The research team developed a highly sensitive dual optical sensor to detect oxygen at different temperature levels. It consists of two light-emitting compounds, one of which can be used to detect temperature and the other to detect oxygen. The results obtained by the authors confirmed that the double sensor was able to detect temperature changes in the range from 0 to 120 °C.
In the following years, new ideas for this type of sensors that could be used in the packaging of food products were developed. For example, Borchert, Kerry, and Papkovsky developed an optochemical sensor to measure CO2 in food stored in modified-atmosphere packaging. They found that the sensor could retain its sensitivity to CO2 at 4 °C for almost three weeks [50]. Heising, Boekel, and Dekker have designed a sensor to check the freshness of packaged cod fillets by monitoring volatile compounds released from the fish during storage [41].
In addition, there are also luminescence sensors in which emitted fluorescence or chemiluminescence signals are measured after the analyte is retained in an appropriate carrier. Then, the reaction of solid phase luminescence (SPL) or its equivalent (SML) begins. This reaction helps to detect the desired food ingredients and verify the existence of contaminants in a given product [101].
The most promising indicators are sensors that are sensitive to pH changes caused by food product degradation, such as acid or alkaline gases [102]. Consideration should also be given to fiber optic oxygen sensors based on fluorescence. Unlike conventional gas sensors, they do not utilize oxygen, are not susceptible to electromagnetic interference, and are additionally suitable for measuring liquids and gases. The most popular fluorescence-based oxygen sensor on the market is O2xyDot from OxySense in Delware, the USA. Its main advantage is that it can be read from the outside of the package without destroying it [16]. However, it should be mentioned that this system can only be used in transparent packaging, which is a limitation of its application.
The main advantages of the characterized sensors include their high measurement precision and sensitivity. In addition, they provide quantitative information on temperature, humidity, and gas concentration inside the package. In addition, the sensors can be linked to various IP systems such as RFID. Consequently, the user receives more accurate information [2].

4. Intelligent Packaging Based on Biosensors

Intelligent packaging with biosensors, which is a special case of sensors, also deserves special attention. There is a significant difference between chemical sensors and biosensors in the recognition layer. Chemical sensors consist of a layer designed to recognize the chemical compound. In contrast, biosensors are composed of receptors of biological materials, i.e., antigens, enzymes, nucleic acids, or hormones [103].
Biosensors work on the principle of monitoring and detecting potential changes (biological reactions) in controlled products. In addition, such a biosensor becomes an integral part of the packaging or is located directly within it. For example, there is packaging that signals the onset of putrefaction processes within the package or baby food packaging that contains sterility sensors (based on amylase detection).
The main component of biosensors is the bioreceptor, which is responsible for controlling microbiological changes in food products. In addition, it is capable of recognizing enzyme activity, antigens, hormones, or microorganisms. In addition to the bioreceptor, there is also a transducer (acoustic, optical, or electrochemical), which converts biological signals into electrical ones [19,20]. The operation of a typical biosensor is shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
Today, biosensors are increasingly being used by manufacturers. In the food packaging industry, and especially in the fish and meat industries, biosensors are being used in pathogen detection and safety systems [104].
SIRA Technologies (USA) has developed the Food Sentinel System biosensor. The technology is based on barcodes found on packaging; a specific antimicrobial antibody is introduced into the membrane-forming part of the barcode. When the product has been exposed to unfavorable conditions and a pathogen enters the product, the biosensor attaches to the membrane-forming barcode alerts consumers and retailers that the product is unfit for consumption. When the product becomes contaminated, the biosensor turns red and a dark bar is created, making the barcode unreadable when scanned; consequently, this prevents the sale of the defective product [20].
Another solution for monitoring the safety of food products by biosensors has been proposed by Toxin Alert Inc. The Toxin Guard™ technology is based on an imaging diagnostic tool used to detect pathogens or other microorganisms that pose a risk of contaminating food products. The device is excellent at detecting such microorganisms as Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria spp., or Salmonella. Toxin Guard™ works by reacting antibodies with antigens on polymeric packaging films—the antimicrobial antibodies are directly integrated into the plastic food packaging. This device works on the principle of an immunoassay. Moreover, when pathogenic bacteria are present, the bacterial toxin fuses with the antibodies contained in the device, and a clear change in the color can be seen on the flexible polymer (polyethylene) film; this means that a positive result is indicated by a visual signal [105].
Ma, Du, and Wang developed a biosensor by integrating curcumin (Cur) into a tara gum (TG)/polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) film. The color response was visible within 1–3 min in the NH3 environment. The team conducted their research on shrimp; they were able to obtain positive results, indicating that the film could be used as a sensor in the food industry [106].
Another biosensor is capable of detecting xanthine, which is a degradation product of adenine nucleotides in animal tissue. For this purpose, xanthine oxide is inactivated on platinum, silver, or pencil-graphite electrodes [71].
Another example, i.e., a device designed by Flex Alert (Canada), is a widely available flexible biosensor for discovering pathogenic compounds in finished food. Very interestingly, this system is capable of inspecting food throughout the supply chain. Flex Alert’s flexible biosensors detect E. coli O157, Listeria spp., and Salmonella spp. pathogens or aflatoxins [24].

5. RFID—Radio-Frequency Identification Systems

Temperature deviations during transport and storage continue to cause significant food losses. A large part of these losses could be avoided if information on the differing transport conditions and the resulting changes in the shelf life of packaged food were available in real time. In particular fresh food is quickly degraded; therefore, in order to control its quality and safety at every stage, the use of radio frequency identification systems seems to be the right solution, as it allows controlling food products almost throughout the supply chain [107].
A radio-frequency identification (RFID) system is a technology based on the integration of tags (made of microchips connected to a small antenna), readers (capable of discharging radio signals and accepting answers from the tag in reply to the sent signals), middleware, and an application system, which is used to integrate the entire technological structure (Figure 4). This system can be placed on any material (e.g., film, paper) and can have any shape. RFID tags are the most advanced data carrier systems and are attached to the package to track and identify the object using radio frequency electromagnetic fields. Tags and readers are designed to communicate with each other. The most advanced RFID systems have the ability to accept data from a distance of 100 m, with a storage range of 1 MB. In addition, a dedicated IT system includes a function to control all readers using middleware and is able to read data records directly from tags [108,109,110].
It should be added that tags have the ability to collect, store, and transmit information in real time to the user’s information system without contact and out of sight. This is possible because they can be linked to an article, box, container, or pallet. Thus, they represent an advanced form of support data information facilitating product identification and location.
Depending on the power supply for communication and other functions, RFID tags can be divided into four basic types: active, passive, semi-active, and semi-passive. Active RFID tags have a reading range of 91 m or more and have a battery that allows them to communicate autonomously. Passive RFID tags, on the other hand, have no internal power supply (no battery installed); therefore, they are unable to communicate until the RFID reader’s emission is activated. RFID systems can also be classified according to the frequency range used: low frequency (LF), 125 to 134.2 KHz; high frequency (HF), 13.56 MHz; ultra-high frequency (UHF), 868–956 MHz; ac frequency, or 2.45 GHz microwave frequency [2].
The task of RFID technology is very simple—it involves automating the transmission of information about a product to a database. Using radio waves, this system helps to identify objects and to wirelessly encode and transmit information data [112]. This allows constant access to the messages contained in the carrier.
On the basis of RFID, a traceability information system is created that combines the logistics process of the supply chain, elements of the company’s business structure, and food safety management. With this solution, the manufacturer is able to monitor information on all types of food, as well as update and store this data in real time. Ultimately, it is also possible to streamline the logistics structure; to guarantee food quality and safety to consumers; and finally to make it easier for businesses, consumers, and regulatory departments to track and provide logistical guarantees for food quality and safety [113].
The creation of a global system containing general information on food products undoubtedly facilitates the flow of data from the manufacturer to the consumer. As consumers are becoming more aware, manufacturers are introducing systems relating to traceability and food traceability [114].
For many years, the RFID system has been implemented in various industries due to the multitude of emerging benefits. These can include, among others, control of food safety, guarantee of reliable and high quality food products, reduction of expenses for quality verification, minimization of costs occurring in the logistics process, fast and efficient monitoring of transmitted information, and reduction of insurance and liability costs [115].
Very often, temperature sensors are added to RFID tag in a package in which a food is contained; hence, it is additionally possible to control the temperature at the right time in the supply chain execution procedure [116]. Interestingly, modern RFID systems are able to read all of the individual measured temperature data from the entire period covered by the measurement. Thanks to this function, the device counts statistical changes and communicates them to a computer so as to verify their compliance. Such a solution greatly facilitates the control of the entire logistics system of the logistics chain.
RFID technology has found its way into food packaging due to its ability to include a lot of information about products. An example of the application of this technology is the SmartCorq wine stoppers from Arnoldo Caprai, which included data on the type of wine or its country of origin and additionally include information on its processing and storage conditions [117].
Another example was presented by Papetti et al. [53], who developed an electronic control system combined with a quality monitoring system for traditional Italian cheese. Interestingly, consumers have access to all of the important information, which is very easy to obtain using an RFID code. In turn, Rahman designed a wireless network of RFID-controlled sensors to control wine ingredients throughout the supply chain. The performance and efficiency of such a system proved to be very high; hence, the efficiency of the real-time tracking proved to be high [118]. In contrast, Potyrailo et al. [119] proposed a systematic real-time assessment of packaged milk freshness, marketing, and distribution using RFID tags.
Avery Dennison has developed an RFID tag called WaveSafe that can be used in microwaves [19]. A few years ago, Amin et al. also developed a unique chipless RFID sensor system for the wireless detection of food and other tagged items. Due to the lack of chips, the RFID sensor does not require an electrical power source like other RFID systems, allowing it to be easily applied and used without any maintenance requirements [120].

6. Hybrid Intelligent Packaging Systems

Nowadays, it is becoming increasingly common for manufacturers of modern intelligent packaging to use a combination of the basic tools in these systems based on scientific research. Mention should be made here of the work carried out by Huang et al. [121], who developed a pH sensor embedded in a battery-free radio frequency transmitter for monitoring degradation processes in fish products. Also in the same year, Smits et al. [122] have proposed an RFID tag with sensors capable of measuring temperature, humidity, and the presence of volatile amine compounds to assess the freshness of cod.
Sen et al. have developed a system containing an RFID tag combined with a temperature sensor, a gas sensor, a reader, and a server to monitor the freshness of meat (pork) [123]. This monitoring system successfully demonstrated the freshness of meat for four classes, i.e., high, medium, low, and spoiled. In contrast, Eom et al. used an RFID + CO2 and O2 sensor combination to determine the freshness of broccoli [49].
Martínez-Olmos et al. based their solution on an RFID tag, which they integrated with an optical oxygen indicator containing a layer of platinum octaethylporphyrin. They showed that the system they created is suitable for use in food packaging systems with an oxygen concentration lower than 2%, a detection limit of 40 ppm, and a resolution of 0.1 ppm O2, with electricity consumption of 3.55 mA [124].
Lorite et al. [4] have developed a novel and functional intelligent critical temperature indicator (CTI) integrated with RFID. The indicator is based on the melting point of a specific solvent and was developed based on microfluidic technology. As a result, the CTI sensor combines irreversible visual color changes and radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology to facilitate real-time supply chain monitoring through the simple use of an RFID reader at strategic points.
In turn, Alfian et al. [125] proposed an integrated food traceability system using RFID technology and a wireless sensor network to collect temperature and humidity during storage and transportation throughout the kimchi supply chain in Korea. Validation of this system yielded positive results for detecting product location in real time and providing a complete temperature and humidity history [125].

7. Application of Nanotechnology in Intelligent Packaging Systems

The concept of modern nanotechnology was first established in 1959 by Nobel laureate Richard P. Feynman during his lecture “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom” [126], in which he presented the novel concept of manipulating matter at the atomic level. Then, in 1974, Japanese researcher Norio Taniguchi was the first to use “nanotechnology” to describe semiconductor (precision engineering) processes occurring at the nanometer level (i.e., with tolerances of a micron or less). In his definition, he claimed that nanotechnology involves the processing, separation, consolidation, and deformation of materials by a single atom or molecule [127,128]. Another definition says that nanotechnology means understanding, controlling, and restructuring matter on the order of nanometers (i.e., less than 100 nm) to create materials with entirely new properties and functions [129]. It should be added that the concept of nanotechnology varies from field to field and from country to country. On October 18, 2011, the European Commission (EC) adopted the “Recommendation on the definition of a nanomaterial” [130].
Since Feynman’s lecture, there have been many revolutionary discoveries in various fields of science concerning the manipulation of matter at an extremely small scale at the level of molecules and atoms, i.e., at the nanoscale. Hence, the term nanotechnology is commonly used to describe anything that is very small—nanostructure materials have a mean size of 1–100 nm [131,132]. It should be added that, regardless of the definition used, nanotechnology uses nanomaterials for the benefit of humans [131].
Currently, nanotechnology is widely used in many different sectors—manufacturing, electronics, medicine and healthcare, energy, biotechnology, information technology, national security, agriculture, and the environment [133,134]. This is related to the fact that innovative nanostructured materials and nanocomposites are known for their unique physical and chemical properties and enhanced performance and are therefore preferred over their macrostructural counterparts. Hence, they are also used in the food industry not only for food preservation and processing but also for food packaging [132].
It is undeniable that, in the context of food, packaging is one of the most essential and difficult elements, as food products must be safe and must have the proper quality for a long time. Hence, manufacturers should pay very close attention to choosing the right packaging [135]. Intelligent packaging incorporates nanosensors to monitor the condition of food or other contents. Nano-enabled products include nanocomposites, barrier layers, active components, and intelligent product features [136]. Nanomaterials and nanoparticles include nanoparticles, nanotubes, fullerenes, nanofibers, nanocylinders, and nanosheets [137].
Nanocomposites used in packaging films are an example of an interesting solution. They overcome the problems of standard packaging because they are enriched with antimicrobial properties. They prevent degradation from the outside and protect the product thermally due to the presence of nanosensors that alert consumers to the conditions and safety of the food product [138].
The structure of packaging containing nanoclay platelets slows down the transmission of gases and thus significantly extends the shelf life of stored food and beverages. Nanocomposites containing nanoclays improve the strength and flexibility of packaging materials while providing effective barrier properties [136,139,140]. Other nanocomposites include chitosan-based nanocomposites [141,142,143,144], proteins [139,145,146], cellulose [147,148], and starch [149,150,151]. In addition, various metals and their oxides, e.g., silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), nano zinc oxide (nano-ZnO), nano titanium dioxide (nano-TiO2), etc., have been used for antimicrobial activity [138].
It should also be mentioned that, thanks to their unique optical and electronic properties, nanomaterials contribute to the development of a new generation of electronic devices, for example, nanotransistors for the construction of future nanoprocessors and nanomemories, nanobatteries, and nanosensors [2]. Of particular note in the context of intelligent packaging systems are nanosensors. The development of these ultra-sensitive biosensors is made possible by nanomaterials due to differences in their external-surface-area-to-volume ratio, surface characteristics, ionic conductivity, and excellent stability [26].
The application of nanosensors for food packaging, compared to conventional packaging, generates such benefits as an increased speed of analysis, a higher level of sensitivity, and an increased sample throughput (multiplexed systems) on the one hand and lower complexity of tests and reduced financial outlays on the other hand [133]. Nanosensors embedded in packaging are used to detect pathogens and contaminants; in addition, microbial coatings protect contents from bacteria [152,153,154]. Sensors can be referred to as nanosensors when their size, sensitivity, or the distance between the analyte and the sensor is within the nanoscale [138].
The following nanosensors have been devised and used in intelligent packaging: nanosensors in raw bacon packaging for oxygen detection [155], an electronic tongue consisting of an array of nanosensors extremely sensitive to gases released by spoiled food [156,157], fluorescent nanoparticles detecting pathogens and toxins in food and crops [158,159,160,161,162,163], nanosensors detecting temperature changes [164,165], nanosensors detecting organophosphorus pesticide residues in food [166,167,168,169,170,171,172], and nanosensors detecting changes in humidity or temperature under the influence of moisture [173,174].
Nanotechnology can also provide additional functionality to barcodes. This is done by incorporating nanoparticles into the barcode ink, as they can provide tracking and traceability information. The RFID tags then consist of a silicon microprocessor providing memory for data and a coupling element acting as an antenna to access the information [136,175,176,177].
In conclusion, the implementation of nanotechnology in various areas of food packaging is undoubtedly a growing field. Through the use of nanosensors in packaging, the new technology helps to increase food safety, reduce the time of detection of pathogens or control the quality of food and packaging throughout the supply chain and at various stages of the logistics process, and provide a longer shelf life for food products. Nanotechnology applied to intelligent packaging can help provide the authentication, tracking, and localization of product features to avoid the adulteration of a variety of products intended for a specific market. It should be added that it can contribute not only to providing end users with improved products but also to better consumer experiences and brand recognition.

8. Challenges and Perspectives

Intelligent packaging innovations are an area of interest for researchers and manufacturers due to the range of benefits they offer. The use of intelligent packaging guarantees higher food quality and safety, in addition to convenience for consumers, but also provides control throughout the production and logistics chain.
The future of intelligent packaging applied to food seems optometric, but there are some gaps, and more perfect research needs to be done to make intelligent packaging profitable. This would make them an everyday part of food packaging. What is needed is a presentation of the economic side, as well as the technical side, which are integrally related to the feasibility of various new systems. This is very important from the perspective of manufacturers introducing such technologies on a large scale. This is achievable with the cooperation of governmental bodies, research centers, and companies.
The comprehensive description of the applied technologies in this article can help researchers, manufacturers, marketers, and consumers to tailor an integrated packaging system to individual applications.
Noteworthy, for the time being, intelligent packaging is mainly used in the food industry and less frequently in other industries. It is worth considering other areas of life sciences wherein intelligent packaging could prove its worth in e.g., the pharmaceutical or cosmetics industries. The safety level of medicines or cosmetics should be as high as the safety of products intended for consumption. As in the food industry, barcodes would improve the traceability or temperature control of such products.
As mentioned earlier, issues related to the price of intelligent packaged products need to be addressed. The higher price of such products may effectively deter potential consumers. Understandably, consumers do not want to pay more for their favorite products only because they come in different packaging. Hence, the advantages of such systems need to be communicated. Very importantly, trust needs to be built among consumers about the safety of intelligent packaging. Extensive public education and promotion of such systems is needed. Finally, the use of intelligent packaging can give a significant advantage in the market due to the possibility of the real-time control of food products. If all steps are taken to bring such solutions to the market, intelligent packaging will help producers and consumers in various spheres.
Hence, it is important to continue research into intelligent packaging given the multitude of benefits it can offer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.O., M.S. and A.S.-W.; investigation E.O., M.S. and A.S.-W.; writing—original draft preparation, E.O., M.S. and A.S.-W.; writing—review and editing, E.O. and M.S.; visualization, E.O.; supervision, A.S.-W. All the authors contributed to writing, reviewing, and structuring the work. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wikström, F.; Verghese, K.; Auras, R.; Olsson, A.; Williams, H.; Wever, R.; Grönman, K.; Kvalvåg Pettersen, M.; Møller, H.; Soukka, R. Packaging Strategies That Save Food: A Research Agenda for 2030. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 532–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fuertes, G.; Soto, I.; Carrasco, R.; Vargas, M.; Sabattin, J.; Lagos, C. Intelligent Packaging Systems: Sensors and Nanosensors to Monitor Food Quality and Safety. J. Sens. 2016, 2016, 4046061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Fung, F.; Wang, H.-S.; Menon, S. Food Safety in the 21st Century. Biomed. J. 2018, 41, 88–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Lorite, G.S.; Selkälä, T.; Sipola, T.; Palenzuela, J.; Jubete, E.; Viñuales, A.; Cabañero, G.; Grande, H.J.; Tuominen, J.; Uusitalo, S. Novel, Smart and RFID Assisted Critical Temperature Indicator for Supply Chain Monitoring. J. Food Eng. 2017, 193, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tichoniuk, M.; Biegańska, M.; Cierpiszewski, R. Intelligent Packaging: Sustainable Food Processing and Engineering Challenges. In Sustainable Food Processing and Engineering Challenges; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; pp. 279–313. [Google Scholar]
  6. Molina-Besch, K.; Olsson, A. Innovations in Food Packaging—Sustainability Challenges and Future Scenarios. In Future Foods; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 375–392. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagchi, A.; He, T. Intelligent Sensing and Packaging of Foods for Enhancement of Shelf Life: Concepts and Applications. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2012, 3, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  8. Tu, Y.; Yang, Z.; Ma, C. Touching Tastes: The Haptic Perception Transfer of Liquid Food Packaging Materials. Food Qual. Prefer. 2015, 39, 124–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sohail, M.; Sun, D.-W.; Zhu, Z. Recent Developments in Intelligent Packaging for Enhancing Food Quality and Safety. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 2650–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Müller, P.; Schmid, M. Intelligent Packaging in the Food Sector: A Brief Overview. Foods 2019, 8, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kalpana, S.; Priyadarshini, S.R.; Leena, M.M.; Moses, J.A.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Intelligent Packaging: Trends and Applications in Food Systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 93, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Domínguez, R.; Barba, F.J.; Gómez, B.; Putnik, P.; Kovačević, D.B.; Pateiro, M.; Santos, E.M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Active Packaging Films with Natural Antioxidants to Be Used in Meat Industry: A Review. Food Res. Int. 2018, 113, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Khaneghah, A.M.; Hashemi, S.M.B.; Limbo, S. Antimicrobial Agents and Packaging Systems in Antimicrobial Active Food Packaging: An Overview of Approaches and Interactions. Food Bioprod. Process. 2018, 111, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, S.; Brahma, S.; Mackay, J.; Cao, C.; Aliakbarian, B. The Role of Smart Packaging System in Food Supply Chain. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Mustafa, F.; Andreescu, S. Chemical and Biological Sensors for Food-Quality Monitoring and Smart Packaging. Foods 2018, 7, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mohebi, E.; Marquez, L. Intelligent Packaging in Meat Industry: An Overview of Existing Solutions. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 3947–3964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kuswandi, B.; Wicaksono, Y.; Abdullah, A.; Heng, L.Y.; Ahmad, M. Smart Packaging: Sensors for Monitoring of Food Quality and Safety. Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. Saf. 2011, 5, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Warner, R.D.; Johnson, S.K. Active and Intelligent Packaging in Meat Industry. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 61, 60–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chowdhury, E.U.; Morey, A. Intelligent Packaging for Poultry Industry. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2019, 28, 791–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ghaani, M.; Cozzolino, C.A.; Castelli, G.; Farris, S. An Overview of the Intelligent Packaging Technologies in the Food Sector. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 51, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Han, J.H.; Ho, C.H.; Rodrigues, E.T. Intelligent Packaging. In Innovations in Food Packaging; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2005; pp. 138–155. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ahvenainen, R. Novel Food Packaging Techniques; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  23. Coles, R.; McDowell, D.; Kirwan, M.J. Food Packaging Technology; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; Volume 5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vanderroost, M.; Ragaert, P.; Devlieghere, F.; De Meulenaer, B. Intelligent Food Packaging: The next Generation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 39, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Beshai, H.; Sarabha, G.K.; Rathi, P.; Alam, A.U.; Deen, M.J. Freshness Monitoring of Packaged Vegetables. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chelliah, R.; Wei, S.; Daliri, E.B.-M.; Rubab, M.; Elahi, F.; Yeon, S.-J.; Jo, K.H.; Yan, P.; Liu, S.; Oh, D.H. Development of Nanosensors Based Intelligent Packaging Systems: Food Quality and Medicine. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kerry, J.P.; O’grady, M.N.; Hogan, S.A. Past, Current and Potential Utilisation of Active and Intelligent Packaging Systems for Meat and Muscle-Based Products: A Review. Meat Sci. 2006, 74, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhai, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, J.; Huang, X.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, D.; Zou, X.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, J.; Holmes, M. A Colorimetric Hydrogen Sulfide Sensor Based on Gellan Gum-Silver Nanoparticles Bionanocomposite for Monitoring of Meat Spoilage in Intelligent Packaging. Food Chem. 2019, 290, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miller, K.; Reichert, C.L.; Schmid, M. Biogenic Amine Detection Systems for Intelligent Packaging Concepts: Meat and Meat Products. In Food Reviews International; Taylor & Francis: Oxford, UK, 2021; pp. 1–25. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rukchon, C.; Nopwinyuwong, A.; Trevanich, S.; Jinkarn, T.; Suppakul, P. Development of a Food Spoilage Indicator for Monitoring Freshness of Skinless Chicken Breast. Talanta 2014, 130, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Realini, C.E.; Marcos, B. Active and Intelligent Packaging Systems for a Modern Society. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 404–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Zhang, J.; Zou, X.; Zhai, X.; Huang, X.; Jiang, C.; Holmes, M. Preparation of an Intelligent PH Film Based on Biodegradable Polymers and Roselle Anthocyanins for Monitoring Pork Freshness. Food Chem. 2019, 272, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yousefi, H.; Ali, M.M.; Su, H.-M.; Filipe, C.D.; Didar, T.F. Sentinel Wraps: Real-Time Monitoring of Food Contamination by Printing DNAzyme Probes on Food Packaging. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 3287–3294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, D.; Zhang, M.; Chen, H.; Bhandari, B. Freshness Monitoring Technology of Fish Products in Intelligent Packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1279–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Naghdi, S.; Rezaei, M.; Abdollahi, M. A Starch-Based PH-Sensing and Ammonia Detector Film Containing Betacyanin of Paperflower for Application in Intelligent Packaging of Fish. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 191, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ezati, P.; Rhim, J.-W. PH-Responsive Chitosan-Based Film Incorporated with Alizarin for Intelligent Packaging Applications. Food Hydrocoll. 2020, 102, 105629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Apriliyanti, M.W.; Wahyono, A.; Fatoni, M.; Poerwanto, B.; Suryaningsih, W. The Potency of Betacyanins Extract from a Peel of Dragon Fruits as a Source of Colourimetric Indicator to Develop Intelligent Packaging for Fish Freshness Monitoring. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, 26–27 September 2018; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2018; Volume 207, p. 012038. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ibrahim, S.; Fahmy, H.; Salah, S. Application of Interactive and Intelligent Packaging for Fresh Fish Shelf-Life Monitoring. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zeng, P.; Chen, X.; Qin, Y.-R.; Zhang, Y.-H.; Wang, X.-P.; Wang, J.-Y.; Ning, Z.-X.; Ruan, Q.-J.; Zhang, Y.-S. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Colorimetric Indicator Film Based on Gelatin/Polyvinyl Alcohol Incorporating Mulberry Anthocyanin Extracts for Monitoring Fish Freshness. Food Res. Int. 2019, 126, 108604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Bhadra, S.; Narvaez, C.; Thomson, D.J.; Bridges, G.E. Non-Destructive Detection of Fish Spoilage Using a Wireless Basic Volatile Sensor. Talanta 2015, 134, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Heising, J.K.; Dekker, M.; Bartels, P.V.; Van Boekel, M. Monitoring the Quality of Perishable Foods: Opportunities for Intelligent Packaging. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 54, 645–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Mirza Alizadeh, A.; Masoomian, M.; Shakooie, M.; Zabihzadeh Khajavi, M.; Farhoodi, M. Trends and Applications of Intelligent Packaging in Dairy Products: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 62, 383–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Romero, A.; Sharp, J.L.; Dawson, P.L.; Darby, D.; Cooksey, K. Evaluation of Two Intelligent Packaging Prototypes with a PH Indicator to Determine Spoilage of Cow Milk. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 30, 100720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Soares, N.; Silva, C.; Santiago-Silva, P.; Espitia, P.; Gonçalves, M.; Lopez, M.; Miltz, J.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Teixeira, J.A. Active and Intelligent Packaging for Milk and Milk Products; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  45. Magnaghi, L.R.; Zanoni, C.; Alberti, G.; Quadrelli, P.; Biesuz, R. Towards Intelligent Packaging: BCP-EVOH@ Optode for Milk Freshness Measurement. Talanta 2022, 241, 123230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pereira, V.A., Jr.; de Arruda, I.N.Q.; Stefani, R. Active Chitosan/PVA Films with Anthocyanins from Brassica Oleraceae (Red Cabbage) as Time–Temperature Indicators for Application in Intelligent Food Packaging. Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 43, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shinde, R.; Rodov, V.; Krishnakumar, S.; Subramanian, J. Active and Intelligent Packaging for Reducing Postharvest Losses of Fruits and Vegetables. In Post Harvest Biology Nanotechnol; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  48. Occhiuzzi, C.; D’Uva, N.; Nappi, S.; Amendola, S.; Giallucca, C.; Chiabrando, V.; Garavaglia, L.; Giacalone, G.; Marrocco, G. Radio-Frequency-Identification-Based Intelligent Packaging: Electromagnetic Classification of Tropical Fruit Ripening. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2020, 62, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eom, K.H.; Kim, M.C.; Lee, S.J.; won Lee, C. The Vegetable Freshness Monitoring System Using RFID with Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Sensor. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2012, 8, 472986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Borchert, N.B.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. A CO2 Sensor Based on Pt-Porphyrin Dye and FRET Scheme for Food Packaging Applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 176, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abdolsattari, P.; Rezazadeh-Bari, M.; Pirsa, S. Smart Film Based on Polylactic Acid, Modified with Polyaniline/ZnO/CuO: Investigation of Physicochemical Properties and Its Use of Intelligent Packaging of Orange Juice. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2022, 15, 2803–2825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kim, J.U.; Ghafoor, K.; Ahn, J.; Shin, S.; Lee, S.H.; Shahbaz, H.M.; Shin, H.-H.; Kim, S.; Park, J. Kinetic Modeling and Characterization of a Diffusion-Based Time-Temperature Indicator (TTI) for Monitoring Microbial Quality of Non-Pasteurized Angelica Juice. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 67, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Papetti, P.; Costa, C.; Antonucci, F.; Figorilli, S.; Solaini, S.; Menesatti, P. A RFID Web-Based Infotracing System for the Artisanal Italian Cheese Quality Traceability. Food Control 2012, 27, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lee, S.Y.; Lee, S.J.; Choi, D.S.; Hur, S.J. Current Topics in Active and Intelligent Food Packaging for Preservation of Fresh Foods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2015, 95, 2799–2810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Mu, W.; Moga, L.M.; Zhang, X. Development of Temperature-Managed Traceability System for Frozen and Chilled Food during Storage and Transportation. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2009, 7, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  56. Regulation (EC) No. 1935/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 October 2004 on Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food and Repealing Directives 80/590/EEC and 89/109/EEC. J. Eur. Union L 2004, 338, 4–16.
  57. Dainelli, D.; Gontard, N.; Spyropoulos, D.; Zondervan-van den Beuken, E.; Tobback, P. Active and Intelligent Food Packaging: Legal Aspects and Safety Concerns. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, S103–S112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Janjarasskul, T.; Suppakul, P. Active and Intelligent Packaging: The Indication of Quality and Safety. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2018, 58, 808–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Restuccia, D.; Spizzirri, U.G.; Parisi, O.I.; Cirillo, G.; Curcio, M.; Iemma, F.; Puoci, F.; Vinci, G.; Picci, N. New EU Regulation Aspects and Global Market of Active and Intelligent Packaging for Food Industry Applications. Food Control 2010, 21, 1425–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Summers, L. Intelligent Packaging; Centre for Exploitation of Science and Technology: London, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  61. Karel, M. Tasks of Food Technology in the 21st Century. Food Technol. Chic. 2000, 54, 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ohlsson, T.; Bengtsson, N. Minimal Processing Technologies in the Food Industry; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  63. Commission Regulation (EC) No. 450/2009 of 29 May 2009 on Active and Intelligent Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food. J. Eur. Union 2009, 135, 3–11.
  64. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) Guidelines on Submission of a Dossier for Safety Evaluation by the EFSA of Active or Intelligent Substances Present in Active and Intelligent Materials and Articles Intended to Come into Contact with Food. EFSA J. 2009, 7, 1208.
  65. Mendes, A.C.; Pedersen, G.A. Perspectives on Sustainable Food Packaging:–Is Bio-Based Plastics a Solution? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Beneventi, E.; Tietz, T.; Merkel, S. Risk Assessment of Food Contact Materials. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e181109. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (EFSA CONTAM Panel); Schrenk, D.; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.K.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Kraupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.-C. Risk to Human Health Related to the Presence of Perfluoroalkyl Substances in Food. EFSA J. 2020, 18, e06223. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  68. Panel, E.B. Update of the List of QPS-Recommended Biological Agents Intentionally Added to Food or Feed as Notified to EFSA 14: Suitability of Taxonomic Units Notified to EFSA until March 2021. EFSA J. 2021, 19, e06689. [Google Scholar]
  69. Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Bolton, D.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; Davies, R.; De Cesare, A.; Hilbert, F. Update of the List of QPS-Recommended Biological Agents Intentionally Added to Food or Feed as Notified to EFSA 10: Suitability of Taxonomic Units Notified to EFSA until March 2019. EFSA J. 2019, 17, e05753. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yam, K.L.; Takhistov, P.T.; Miltz, J. Intelligent Packaging: Concepts and Applications. J. Food Sci. 2005, 70, R1–R10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Biji, K.; Ravishankar, C.; Mohan, C.; Srinivasa Gopal, T. Smart Packaging Systems for Food Applications: A Review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 6125–6135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Poyatos-Racionero, E.; Ros-Lis, J.V.; Vivancos, J.-L.; Martinez-Manez, R. Recent Advances on Intelligent Packaging as Tools to Reduce Food Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3398–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Mlalila, N.; Kadam, D.M.; Swai, H.; Hilonga, A. Transformation of Food Packaging from Passive to Innovative via Nanotechnology: Concepts and Critiques. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 3395–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Yamasaki, H. What Are the Intelligent Sensors. In Handbook of Sensors and Actuators; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1996; Volume 3, pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  75. Cattrall, R.W. Chemical Sensors; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  76. Hanrahan, G.; Patil, D.G.; Wang, J. Electrochemical Sensors for Environmental Monitoring: Design, Development and Applications. J. Environ. Monit. 2004, 6, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Yousefi, H.; Su, H.-M.; Imani, S.M.; Alkhaldi, K.; Filipe, M.C.D.; Didar, T.F. Intelligent Food Packaging: A Review of Smart Sensing Technologies for Monitoring Food Quality. ACS Sens. 2019, 4, 808–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Pavelková, A. Time Temperature Indicators as Devices Intelligent Packaging. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2013, 61, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Drago, E.; Campardelli, R.; Pettinato, M.; Perego, P. Innovations in Smart Packaging Concepts for Food: An Extensive Review. Foods 2020, 9, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Han, J.-W.; Ruiz-Garcia, L.; Qian, J.-P.; Yang, X.-T. Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review and Future Trends. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2018, 17, 860–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Pandey, S.K.; Kim, K.-H. The Relative Performance of NDIR-Based Sensors in the near Real-Time Analysis of CO2 in Air. Sensors 2007, 7, 1683–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Park, Y.W.; Kim, S.M.; Lee, J.Y.; Jang, W. Application of Biosensors in Smart Packaging. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2015, 11, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Putra, B.T.W.; Kuswandi, B. Smart Food Sensing and IoT Technologies. In Bio-and Nano-Sensing Technologies for Food Processing and Packaging; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2022; pp. 129–150. [Google Scholar]
  84. Won, S.; Won, K. Self-Powered Flexible Oxygen Sensors for Intelligent Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 29, 100713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kuswandi, B.; Jayus; Restyana, A.; Abdullah, A.; Heng, L.Y.; Ahmad, M. A Novel Colorimetric Food Package Label for Fish Spoilage Based on Polyaniline Film. Food Control 2012, 25, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Pereira, P.F.; Picciani, P.H.; Calado, V.; Tonon, R.V. Gelatin-Based Nanobiocomposite Films as Sensitive Layers for Monitoring Relative Humidity in Food Packaging. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2020, 13, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gaikwad, K.K.; Singh, S.; Ajji, A. Moisture Absorbers for Food Packaging Applications. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2019, 17, 609–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Das, R.; Bej, S.; Hirani, H.; Banerjee, P. Trace-Level Humidity Sensing from Commercial Organic Solvents and Food Products by an AIE/ESIPT-Triggered Piezochromic Luminogen and Ppb-Level “OFF–ON–OFF” Sensing of Cu2+: A Combined Experimental and Theoretical Outcome. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 14104–14121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Tan, E.L.; Ng, W.N.; Shao, R.; Pereles, B.D.; Ong, K.G. A Wireless, Passive Sensor for Quantifying Packaged Food Quality. Sensors 2007, 7, 1747–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Bibi, F.; Guillaume, C.; Vena, A.; Gontard, N.; Sorli, B. Wheat Gluten, a Bio-Polymer Layer to Monitor Relative Humidity in Food Packaging: Electric and Dielectric Characterization. Sens. Actuators Phys. 2016, 247, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Wawrzynek, E.; Baumbauer, C.; Arias, A.C. Characterization and Comparison of Biodegradable Printed Capacitive Humidity Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 6557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Raju, R.; Bridges, G.E. Radar Cross Section-Based Chipless Tag with Built-in Reference for Relative Humidity Monitoring of Packaged Food Commodities. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 21, 18773–18780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Cheng, H.; Xu, H.; McClements, D.J.; Chen, L.; Jiao, A.; Tian, Y.; Miao, M.; Jin, Z. Recent Advances in Intelligent Food Packaging Materials: Principles, Preparation and Applications. Food Chem. 2022, 375, 131738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, S.; Liu, X.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Xiang, K.; Tang, R. Review of Time Temperature Indicators as Quality Monitors in Food Packaging. Packag. Technol. Sci. 2015, 28, 839–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Firouz, M.S.; Mohi-Alden, K.; Omid, M. A Critical Review on Intelligent and Active Packaging in the Food Industry: Research and Development. Food Res. Int. 2021, 141, 110113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Lim, S.; Gunasekaran, S.; Imm, J.-Y. Gelatin-Templated Gold Nanoparticles as Novel Time–Temperature Indicator. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, N45–N49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Siddiqui, J.; Taheri, M.; Alam, A.U.; Deen, M.J. Nanomaterials in Smart Packaging Applications: A Review. Small 2022, 18, 2101171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Choi, S.; Eom, Y.; Kim, S.-M.; Jeong, D.-W.; Han, J.; Koo, J.M.; Hwang, S.Y.; Park, J.; Oh, D.X. A Self-Healing Nanofiber-Based Self-Responsive Time-Temperature Indicator for Securing a Cold-Supply Chain. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Dodero, A.; Escher, A.; Bertucci, S.; Castellano, M.; Lova, P. Intelligent Packaging for Real-Time Monitoring of Food-Quality: Current and Future Developments. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Baleizao, C.; Nagl, S.; Schäferling, M.; Berberan-Santos, M.N.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Dual Fluorescence Sensor for Trace Oxygen and Temperature with Unmatched Range and Sensitivity. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6449–6457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ibañez, G.A.; Escandar, G.M. Luminescence Sensors Applied to Water Analysis of Organic Pollutants—An Update. Sensors 2011, 11, 11081–11102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dalmoro, V.; dos Santos, J.H.Z.; Pires, M.; Simanke, A.; Baldino, G.B.; Oliveira, L. Encapsulation of Sensors for Intelligent Packaging. In Food Packaging; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 111–145. [Google Scholar]
  103. Wang, X.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-Optic Chemical Sensors and Biosensors (2015–2019). Anal. Chem. 2019, 92, 397–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Alocilja, E.C.; Radke, S.M. Market Analysis of Biosensors for Food Safety. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18, 841–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Han, J.H. A Review of Food Packaging Technologies and Innovations. In Innovations in Food Packaging; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  106. Ma, Q.; Du, L.; Wang, L. Tara Gum/Polyvinyl Alcohol-Based Colorimetric NH3 Indicator Films Incorporating Curcumin for Intelligent Packaging. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 244, 759–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Fu, N.; Cheng, T.C.E.; Tian, Z. RFID Investment Strategy for Fresh Food Supply Chains. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2019, 70, 1475–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kumar, P.; Reinitz, H.W.; Simunovic, J.; Sandeep, K.P.; Franzon, P.D. Overview of RFID Technology and Its Applications in the Food Industry. J. Food Sci. 2009, 74, R101–R106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Costa, C.; Antonucci, F.; Pallottino, F.; Aguzzi, J.; Sarriá, D.; Menesatti, P. A Review on Agri-Food Supply Chain Traceability by Means of RFID Technology. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2013, 6, 353–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bibi, F.; Guillaume, C.; Gontard, N.; Sorli, B. A Review: RFID Technology Having Sensing Aptitudes for Food Industry and Their Contribution to Tracking and Monitoring of Food Products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 91–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, R.-S.; Chen, C.C.; Yeh, K.C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Kuo, C.W. Using RFID Technology in Food Produce Traceability. WSEAS Trans. Inf. Sci. Appl. 2008, 5, 1551–1560. [Google Scholar]
  112. Neumann, T. Koncepcja Zastosowania Technologii RFID w Transporcie Drogowym. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Morskiej W Gdyni 2017, 102, 44–60. [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhou, H. Application of RFID Information Technology in Fresh Food Cold Chain Logistics Management. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 1881, p. 032002. [Google Scholar]
  114. Mosadegh Sedghy, B. Evolution of Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) in Agricultural Cold Chain Monitoring: A Literature Review. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 11, 43–58. [Google Scholar]
  115. Olsen, P.; Borit, M. How to Define Traceability. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 29, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Vivaldi, F.; Melai, B.; Bonini, A.; Poma, N.; Salvo, P.; Kirchhain, A.; Tintori, S.; Bigongiari, A.; Bertuccelli, F.; Isola, G. A Temperature-Sensitive RFID Tag for the Identification of Cold Chain Failures. Sens. Actuators Phys. 2020, 313, 112182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Głowienka, W.; Jarosz, M.; Stoma, M. Technologia RFID–Koncepcja i Zastosowanie. In Problemy Wspólczesnej Inżynierii; Wyd. Politechniki Lubelskiej: Lublin, Poland, 2020; pp. 72–83. [Google Scholar]
  118. Rahman, M.A. RFID-Based Tracing for Wine Supply Chain. Int. J. Commun. Netw. Distrib. Syst. 2016, 16, 48–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Potyrailo, R.A.; Nagraj, N.; Tang, Z.; Mondello, F.J.; Surman, C.; Morris, W. Battery-Free Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) Sensors for Food Quality and Safety. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 8535–8543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Amin, E.M.; Karmakar, N.C.; Jensen, B.W. Fully Printable Chipless RFID Multi-Parameter Sensor. Sens. Actuators Phys. 2016, 248, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Huang, W.-D.; Cao, H.; Deb, S.; Chiao, M.; Chiao, J.-C. A Flexible PH Sensor Based on the Iridium Oxide Sensing Film. Sens. Actuators Phys. 2011, 169, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Smits, E.; Schram, J.; Nagelkerke, M.; Kusters, R.; van Heck, G.; van Acht, V.; Koetse, M.; van den Brand, J.; Gerlinck, G. Development of Printed RFID Sensor Tags for Smart Food Packaging. In Proceedings of the 14th International Meeting on Chemical Sensors, Nuremberg, Germany, 20–23 May 2012; pp. 403–406. [Google Scholar]
  123. Sen, L.; Hyun, K.H.; Kim, J.W.; Shin, J.W.; Eom, K.H. The Design of Smart RFID System with Gas Sensor for Meat Freshness Monitoring. Adv. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2013, 41, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  124. Martínez-Olmos, A.; Fernández-Salmerón, J.; Lopez-Ruiz, N.; Rivadeneyra Torres, A.; Capitan-Vallvey, L.F.; Palma, A.J. Screen Printed Flexible Radiofrequency Identification Tag for Oxygen Monitoring. Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 11098–11105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Alfian, G.; Rhee, J.; Ahn, H.; Lee, J.; Farooq, U.; Ijaz, M.F.; Syaekhoni, M.A. Integration of RFID, Wireless Sensor Networks, and Data Mining in an e-Pedigree Food Traceability System. J. Food Eng. 2017, 212, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Feynman, R.P. Plenty of Room at the Bottom. In Proceedings of the APS Annual Meeting, Pasadena, CA, USA, 29 December 1959. [Google Scholar]
  127. Hulla, J.E.; Sahu, S.C.; Hayes, A.W. Nanotechnology: History and Future. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2015, 34, 1318–1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Taniguchi, N. On the Basic Concept of ‘nano-Technology’. In Proceedings of the International Conference of Production Engineering Japan Society of Precision Engineering, Tokyo, Japan; 1974. [Google Scholar]
  129. NNI. The National Nanotechnology Initiative Strategic Plan. December 2004. Available online: https://www.nano.gov/2004-Strategic-Plan (accessed on 20 November 2022).
  130. Commission, E.U. Recommendation on the Definition of Nanomaterial (2011/696/EU). Off. J. Eur. Com. Online 2011, 275, 38–40. [Google Scholar]
  131. Singh, N.A. Nanotechnology Definitions, Research, Industry and Property Rights. In Nanoscience in Food and Agriculture 1; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 43–64. [Google Scholar]
  132. Sahani, S.; Sharma, Y.C. Advancements in Applications of Nanotechnology in Global Food Industry. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Sanchez, F.; Sobolev, K. Nanotechnology in Concrete—A Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 2060–2071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Salata, O.V. Applications of nanoparticles in biology and medicine. J. Nano Biotechnol. 2004, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  135. Wyrwa, J.; Barska, A. Innovations in the Food Packaging Market: Active Packaging. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2017, 243, 1681–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Park, B. Nanotechnology and the Packaging of Food and Other Fast-Moving Consumer Goods. In Trends in Packaging of Food, Beverages and Other Fast-Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG); Woodhead Publishing: Swaston, UK, 2013; pp. 241–260. [Google Scholar]
  137. Cushen, M.; Kerry, J.; Morris, M.; Cruz-Romero, M.; Cummins, E. Nanotechnologies in the Food Industry–Recent Developments, Risks and Regulation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 24, 30–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chausali, N.; Saxena, J.; Prasad, R. Recent Trends in Nanotechnology Applications of Bio-Based Packaging. J. Agric. Food Res. 2022, 7, 100257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Tang, S.; Wang, Z.; Li, W.; Li, M.; Deng, Q.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Chu, P.K. Ecofriendly and Biodegradable Soybean Protein Isolate Films Incorporated with Zno Nanoparticles for Food Packaging. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2019, 2, 2202–2207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Mohammadzadeh-Vazifeh, M.; Hosseini, S.M.; Mohammadi, A.; Jahanfar, M.; Maleki, H. Investigation of the Antimicrobial Properties of Nanoclay and Chitosan Based Nanocomposite on the Microbial Characteristics of Gouda Cheese. Iran. J. Microbiol. 2020, 12, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, H.; Qian, J.; Ding, F. Emerging Chitosan-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 395–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Costa, S.M.; Ferreira, D.P.; Teixeira, P.; Ballesteros, L.F.; Teixeira, J.A.; Fangueiro, R. Active Natural-Based Films for Food Packaging Applications: The Combined Effect of Chitosan and Nanocellulose. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 177, 241–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Nouri, A.; Yaraki, M.T.; Ghorbanpour, M.; Agarwal, S.; Gupta, V.K. Enhanced Antibacterial Effect of Chitosan Film Using Montmorillonite/CuO Nanocomposite. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 109, 1219–1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Rodrigues, C.; de Mello, J.M.M.; Dalcanton, F.; Macuvele, D.L.P.; Padoin, N.; Fiori, M.A.; Soares, C.; Riella, H.G. Mechanical, Thermal and Antimicrobial Properties of Chitosan-Based-Nanocomposite with Potential Applications for Food Packaging. J. Polym. Environ. 2020, 28, 1216–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lara, B.R.B.; de Andrade, P.S.; Guimaraes Junior, M.; Dias, M.V.; Alcântara, L.A.P. Novel Whey Protein Isolate/Polyvinyl Biocomposite for Packaging: Improvement of Mechanical and Water Barrier Properties by Incorporation of Nano-Silica. J. Polym. Environ. 2021, 29, 2397–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Corrado, I.; Abdalrazeq, M.; Pezzella, C.; Di Girolamo, R.; Porta, R.; Sannia, G.; Giosafatto, C.V.L. Design and Characterization of Poly(3-Hydroxybutyrate-Co-Hydroxyhexanoate) Nanoparticles and Their Grafting in Whey Protein-Based Nanocomposites. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 110, 106167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Bastante, C.C.; Silva, N.H.; Cardoso, L.C.; Serrano, C.M.; de la Ossa, E.J.M.; Freire, C.S.; Vilela, C. Biobased Films of Nanocellulose and Mango Leaf Extract for Active Food Packaging: Supercritical Impregnation versus Solvent Casting. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 117, 106709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Wu, Z.; Deng, W.; Luo, J.; Deng, D. Multifunctional Nano-Cellulose Composite Films with Grape Seed Extracts and Immobilized Silver Nanoparticles. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 205, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Goudarzi, V.; Shahabi-Ghahfarrokhi, I.; Babaei-Ghazvini, A. Preparation of Ecofriendly UV-Protective Food Packaging Material by Starch/TiO2 Bio-Nanocomposite: Characterization. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 95, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Jayakumar, A.; Heera, K.V.; Sumi, T.S.; Joseph, M.; Mathew, S.; Praveen, G.; Nair, I.C.; Radhakrishnan, E.K. Starch-PVA Composite Films with Zinc-Oxide Nanoparticles and Phytochemicals as Intelligent PH Sensing Wraps for Food Packaging Application. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 395–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Souza, A.G.; Ferreira, R.R.; Paula, L.C.; Mitra, S.K.; Rosa, D.S. Starch-Based Films Enriched with Nanocellulose-Stabilized Pickering Emulsions Containing Different Essential Oils for Possible Applications in Food Packaging. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2021, 27, 100615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Primožič, M.; Knez, Ž.; Leitgeb, M. (Bio)Nanotechnology in Food Science—Food Packaging. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Cerqueira, M.A.; Vicente, A.A.; Pastrana, L.M. Nanotechnology in Food Packaging: Opportunities and Challenges. In Nanomaterials for Food Packaging; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  154. Caon, T.; Martelli, S.M.; Fakhouri, F.M. New Trends in the Food Industry: Application of Nanosensors in Food Packaging. In Nanobiosensors; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 773–804. [Google Scholar]
  155. Mills, A. Oxygen Indicators and Intelligent Inks for Packaging Food. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 1003–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Mohammadi, Z.; Jafari, S.M. Detection of Food Spoilage and Adulteration by Novel Nanomaterial-Based Sensors. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020, 286, 102297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ojeda, G.A.; Gorman, A.M.A.; Sgroppo, S.C. Nanotechnology and the Application in the Food Industry. Charact. Appl. Nanomater. 2022, 5, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Das, J.; Mishra, H.N. Recent Advances in Sensors for Detecting Food Pathogens, Contaminants, and Toxins: A Review. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2022, 248, 1125–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Girigoswami, A.; Ghosh, M.M.; Pallavi, P.; Ramesh, S.; Girigoswami, K. Nanotechnology in Detection of Food Toxins–Focus on the Dairy Products. Biointerface Res Appl Chem 2021, 11, 14155–14172. [Google Scholar]
  160. Ngafwan, N.; Rasyid, H.; Abood, E.S.; Abdelbasset, W.K.; Al-Shawi, S.G.; Bokov, D.; Jalil, A.T. Study on Novel Fluorescent Carbon Nanomaterials in Food Analysis. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 42, e37821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Lotfi, S.; Ahari, H.; Sahraeyan, R. The Effect of Silver Nanocomposite Packaging Based on Melt Mixing and Sol–Gel Methods on Shelf Life Extension of Fresh Chicken Stored at 4 C. J. Food Saf. 2019, 39, e12625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Zhong, M.; Yang, L.; Yang, H.; Cheng, C.; Deng, W.; Tan, Y.; Xie, Q.; Yao, S. An Electrochemical Immunobiosensor for Ultrasensitive Detection of Escherichia Coli O157: H7 Using CdS Quantum Dots-Encapsulated Metal-Organic Frameworks as Signal-Amplifying Tags. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 126, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Hasan, M.R.; Pulingam, T.; Appaturi, J.N.; Zifruddin, A.N.; Teh, S.J.; Lim, T.W.; Ibrahim, F.; Leo, B.F.; Thong, K.L. Carbon Nanotube-Based Aptasensor for Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Whole-Cell Salmonella. Anal. Biochem. 2018, 554, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Borah, N.; Gogoi, D.; Ghosh, N.N.; Tamuly, C. GA-AuNP@ Tollens’ Complex as a Highly Sensitive Plasmonic Nanosensor for Detection of Formaldehyde and Benzaldehyde in Preserved Food Products. Food Chem. 2023, 399, 133975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sundramoorthy, A.K.; Kumar, T.H.V.; Gunasekaran, S. Graphene-Based Nanosensors and Smart Food Packaging Systems for Food Safety and Quality Monitoring. In Graphene Bioelectronics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 267–306. [Google Scholar]
  166. Verdian, A. Apta-Nanosensors for Detection and Quantitative Determination of Acetamiprid—A Pesticide Residue in Food and Environment. Talanta 2018, 176, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhao, S.; Huang, J.; Lei, J.; Huo, D.; Huang, Q.; Tan, J.; Li, Y.; Hou, C.; Tian, F. A Portable and Automatic Dual-Readout Detector Integrated with 3D-Printed Microfluidic Nanosensors for Rapid Carbamate Pesticides Detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 346, 130454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Khaledian, S.; Noroozi-Aghideh, A.; Kahrizi, D.; Moradi, S.; Abdoli, M.; Ghasemalian, A.H.; Heidari, M.F. Rapid Detection of Diazinon as an Organophosphorus Poison in Real Samples Using Fluorescence Carbon Dots. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2021, 130, 108676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Mustafa, F.; Andreescu, S. Nanotechnology-Based Approaches for Food Sensing and Packaging Applications. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 19309–19336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Oh, S.Y.; Lee, M.J.; Heo, N.S.; Kim, S.; Oh, J.S.; Lee, Y.; Jeon, E.J.; Moon, H.; Kim, H.S.; Park, T.J. Cuvette-Type LSPR Sensor for Highly Sensitive Detection of Melamine in Infant Formulas. Sensors 2019, 19, 3839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  171. Jiang, Y.; Sun, D.-W.; Pu, H.; Wei, Q. Ultrasensitive Analysis of Kanamycin Residue in Milk by SERS-Based Aptasensor. Talanta 2019, 197, 151–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. He, L.; Wang, F.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y. Rapid and Sensitive Colorimetric Detection of Ascorbic Acid in Food Based on the Intrinsic Oxidase-like Activity of MnO2 Nanosheets. Luminescence 2018, 33, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Fathima, A.; Chiome, T.J.; Catherine, A.A.; Egbuna, C.; Achar, R.R.; Srinivasan, A. Smart Use of Nanomaterials as Sensors for Detection and Monitoring of Food Spoilage. In Application of Nanotechnology in Food Science, Processing and Packaging; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 169–188. [Google Scholar]
  174. Bhusare, S.; Kadam, S. Applications of Nanotechnology in Fruits and Vegetables. Food Agric. Spectr. J. 2021, 2, 231–236. [Google Scholar]
  175. Thirugnanasambandan, T. Smart and Intelligent Packaging Based on Biodegradable Composites. In Biodegradable Composites for Packaging Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 169–191. [Google Scholar]
  176. Abraham, J. Future of Food Packaging. In Nanotechnology in Intelligent Food Packaging; Wiley: Hoboke, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 383–417. [Google Scholar]
  177. Zuo, J.; Feng, J.; Gameiro, M.G.; Tian, Y.; Liang, J.; Wang, Y.; Ding, J.; He, Q. RFID-Based Sensing in Smart Packaging for Food Applications: A Review. Future Foods 2022, 6, 100198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Various types of sensors used in intelligent packaging [54].
Figure 1. Various types of sensors used in intelligent packaging [54].
Sensors 22 09956 g001
Figure 2. Theory of operation of biosensors [26].
Figure 2. Theory of operation of biosensors [26].
Sensors 22 09956 g002
Figure 3. Mechanism of operation of biosensors [54].
Figure 3. Mechanism of operation of biosensors [54].
Sensors 22 09956 g003
Figure 4. Mechanism of operation of RFID—diagram [111].
Figure 4. Mechanism of operation of RFID—diagram [111].
Sensors 22 09956 g004
Table 1. Classification of intelligent packaging according to the operation mode [9].
Table 1. Classification of intelligent packaging according to the operation mode [9].
Intelligent Packaging
ComponentBase
Sensors
  • Gas sensors
  • Bio sensors
  • Fluorescence based Oxygen Sensors
Indicators
  • Microbial growth & freshness indicators
  • Time temperature indicators
  • Gas leakage/concentration indicators
Tags/Barcodes
  • 1-D barcode
  • 2-D barcode
  • QR code
  • RFID tags
Holograms
Thermochromic inks
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Osmólska, E.; Stoma, M.; Starek-Wójcicka, A. Application of Biosensors, Sensors, and Tags in Intelligent Packaging Used for Food Products—A Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 9956. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249956

AMA Style

Osmólska E, Stoma M, Starek-Wójcicka A. Application of Biosensors, Sensors, and Tags in Intelligent Packaging Used for Food Products—A Review. Sensors. 2022; 22(24):9956. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249956

Chicago/Turabian Style

Osmólska, Emilia, Monika Stoma, and Agnieszka Starek-Wójcicka. 2022. "Application of Biosensors, Sensors, and Tags in Intelligent Packaging Used for Food Products—A Review" Sensors 22, no. 24: 9956. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249956

APA Style

Osmólska, E., Stoma, M., & Starek-Wójcicka, A. (2022). Application of Biosensors, Sensors, and Tags in Intelligent Packaging Used for Food Products—A Review. Sensors, 22(24), 9956. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22249956

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop