Next Article in Journal
Use of Robotic Platforms as a Tool to Support STEM and Physical Education in Developed Countries: A Descriptive Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Novel Probe for Thermally Controlled Raman Spectroscopy Using Online IR Sensing and Emissivity Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Development of Imaging System for Online Detection of Chicken Meat with Wooden Breast Condition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Smartphone-Based Refractive Index Optosensing Platform Using a DVD Grating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Highly Sensitive Trace Gas Detection Based on In-Plane Single-Quartz-Enhanced Dual Spectroscopy

National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Tunable Laser, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2022, 22(3), 1035; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031035
Submission received: 4 January 2022 / Revised: 26 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Optical Sensors 2022)

Abstract

:
For this invited manuscript, an in-plane single-quartz-enhanced dual spectroscopy (IP-SQEDS)-based trace gas sensor was demonstrated for the first time. A single quartz tuning fork (QTF) was employed to combine in-plane quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (IP-QEPAS) with light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy (LITES) techniques. Water vapor (H2O) was chosen as the target gas. Compared to traditional QEPAS, IP-SQEDS not only allowed for simple structures, but also obtained nearly three times signal amplitude enhancement.

1. Introduction

Trace gas detection has numerous significant applications in various fields, such as biomedical analyses [1,2], combustion diagnosis [3,4,5], atmospheric environmental monitoring [6,7,8,9], as well as petroleum exploration [10,11]. Gas sensing technology based on laser absorption spectroscopy (LAS) has a number of advantages, including high sensitivity, rapid response time, high selectivity, et al. [12]. One of the most commonly used techniques of LAS for gas sensing is photoacoustic spectroscopy (PAS). In PAS, gas samples absorb the modulated or pulsed laser and then release heat outward by non-radiative transition, leading to local thermal expansion and generating acoustic waves. The intensity of external acoustic waves is related to the concentration of gas and can be investigated using a sensitive microphone. Nevertheless, the low resonance frequency and low Q factor (<100) of microphones cause poor signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) for the sensor system. In addition, the microphone-based PAS also possesses the larger size of photoacoustic cells.
An effective improvement method for PAS techniques was firstly put forward in 2002 by taking the place of microphones with a piezoelectric quartz tuning fork (QTF) [13], in which the QTF serves as an acoustic wave detector, whose principle is shown in Figure 1a. This technique is called quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (QEPAS). QEPAS offers a new method for trace gas detection, which provides the merits of high Q-factor detection of QTF (~100,000 in a vacuum and ~10,000 under standard atmosphere pressure), strong anti-noise ability, compact volume and inexpensive price. Hence, various QEPAS-based sensors have been developed in recent years for meeting detection requirements of different trace gases [14,15,16,17,18,19].
In-plane quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy (IP-QEPAS) was proposed by Ma et al. in 2020 [20]. Unlike traditional QEPAS, IP-QEPAS varies the incident position of laser beams. The direction of the laser beam is altered from perpendicular to the QTF plane to parallel to it. Therefore, it improves the effective interaction path length between target gas molecules and excitation sources. Compared to traditional QEPAS, IP-QEPAS had a signal enhancement of more than 40 times when a custom QTF was used [20].
In 2018, a new technique of light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy (LITES) was firstly reported [21]. In LITES, a QTF is employed to detect the absorption variation of light intensity [22,23,24,25,26]. For LITES, whose principle is shown in Figure 1b, when the quartz at the surface of the QTF is irradiated by an intensity modulated laser, the quartz crystal absorbs the laser and converts it into photothermal energy. As a result of this characteristic of light-thermo-elastic conversion, the QTF will undergo elastic deformation, which results in the mechanical vibration of the QTF and the generation of piezoelectric signals [27,28]. Moreover, the oscillation amplitude and the obtained piezoelectric signal will reach a maximum when the intensity-modulated frequency of light is equal to the resonant frequency of one of the flexural modes of the QTF. Compared to QEPAS, LITES can be a non-contact measurement technique [29,30,31]. Therefore, it can be used in some harsh environments, such as combustion fields. Gold and silver are generally applied as a coating on QTFs to collect the electrical charges generated by them; they surely provide excellent conductivity as well as strong reflectivity to light. In the traditional LITES technique, the laser is usually first illuminated on the QTF coating, and then transmitted to the quartz, which results in the low variation of the amount of light absorption by the quartz and further leads to the QTF’s low sensitivity [32,33]. It is worth noting that the standard, commercially available QTF is usually coated with silver only on the surface, and it is not coated in the middle of the two prongs [15,21].
In this invited article, an in-plane single-quartz-enhanced dual spectroscopy (IP-SQEDS) gas detection technique is reported for the first time, in which the laser beam is made parallel to the QTF plane and finally incident to the uncoated quartz at the bottom of the QTF, so that QEPAS and LITES signals are simultaneously excited in a single QTF. An in-plane configuration was adopted to take full advantage of SQEDS. Water vapor (H2O) was adopted as the analyte to evaluate the IP-SQEDS-based sensor performance.

2. Experimental Section

The experimental setup of the IP-SQEDS sensor is displayed in Figure 2. A standard, commercially available QTF with a length of 6 mm, a width of 0.6 mm, a thickness of 0.36 mm, and a gap between the two prongs of 0.3 mm was adopted. The laser beam output from the pigtail of a CW-DFB diode laser was collimated by a fiber collimator (FC). Subsequently, as shown in Figure 2a, in order to improve the effective interaction path length between target gas molecules in the QEPAS technique and excitation sources and enhanced light absorption of QTFs in the LITES technique, the laser beam was passed through the space between the two prongs of the QTF and eventually made incident to the uncoated quartz at the bottom of the QTF. The generated acoustic wave and the periodically absorbed laser energy produced QEPAS and LITES signals, respectively. In order to confirm that the total signal was produced by processes of both QEPAS and LITES, the experimental setup containing only IP-QEPAS was designed by replacing Figure 2a with Figure 2b. A tin foil was placed near the bottom of the QTF and used to only eliminate the LITES signal. In contrast, in the traditional QEPAS sensor, as shown in Figure 2c, the laser beam was collimated by a fiber collimator (FC), and then focused and passed through the optimal location of 0.7 mm below the top of the two prongs of the QTF [18] to obtain the strongest response.
H2O naturally exists in the atmosphere and is non-toxic and harmless [34]. Therefore, at room temperature, H2O with a volume concentration of 1.73% naturally existing in the air was adopted as the analyte to evaluate the performance of this IP-SQEDS-based sensor. According to the HITRAN-2016 database [35], the line strength of H2O and CO2 located between 1335 nm and 1385 nm was simulated and is shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the absorption line of H2O situated at 1368.60 nm (7306.74 cm−1) has a strong line strength while avoiding the interference from CO2.
A continuous wave (CW), distributed feedback (DFB), fiber-coupled diode laser emitting at 1368.60 nm was applied as the excitation source. The wavenumber and output power as a function of the injection current are shown in Figure 4a,b, respectively. The working temperature and injection current of this CW-DFB laser was set to 26 °C and 70 mA, respectively, to ensure that its emission wavelength matched the absorption wavenumber at 7306.74 cm−1 of H2O. The emitted optical power was ∼19.72 mW.
Wavelength modulation spectroscopy (WMS) was performed to modulate the output wavelength of the diode laser, and second-harmonic (2f) detection technology was utilized to demodulate the produced signals from the QTF. The above functions were implemented by employing a Zurich lock-in amplifier. On the one hand, the lock-in amplifier generated a saw-tooth signal and a sine signal. The signal obtained by superposition of the two signals was transmitted onto the laser controller to modulate the output wavelength of the diode laser. On the other hand, the lock-in amplifier extracted the target signal with a particular frequency. These methods effectively maximized the amplitude of the 2f signal and minimized the low-frequency and irrelevant noise of the experimental system.

3. Results and Discussion

Firstly, the properties of the QTF were determined. The resonance curve of the QTF was measured and is shown in Figure 5. The inherent resonant frequency f0 of the QTF was measured as 30,702.4 Hz by using an optical excitation approach, while full width Δf was 2.49 Hz at half-maximum. Based on the formula, Q = f0f, the quality factor (Q-factor) was determined as 12,330. The frequency of the sine signal provided by the lock-in amplifier was set as f0/2 = 15,351.2 Hz to obtain the maximum 2f signal amplitude.
Figure 6 reflects the relationship between laser wavelength modulation current and IP-SQEDS signal amplitude. As the modulation current depth increased, the IP-SQEDS signal amplitude rose at first, but then tended to flatten, and finally declined slowly. The maximum signal was obtained when the modulation current depth was 12.66 mA. As a result, this value was considered as the optimal modulation current and continued to be applied in the subsequent research.
The 2f signals for IP-SQEDS, IP-QEPAS and traditional QEPAS are shown in Figure 7; the experimental configurations of Figure 2a–c were respectively adopted and the time constant of the lock-in amplifier was set as 20 ms. The maximum 2f signal amplitude of IP-SQEDS and traditional QEPAS were measured as 77.11 and 27.24 μV, respectively. The noise was determined when the laser wavelength was far away from the H2O absorption line. The 1σ noise levels of traditional QEPAS and IP-SQEDS were almost the same and measured as 63.83 and 64.87 nV, and their SNRs were 426.76 and 1188.69, respectively.
In order to verify that the signal level of 77.11 μV contained both IP-QEPAS and LITES, a slim tin foil was utilized as the obstacle and placed near the bottom of the QTF to maintain the IP-QEPAS signal and eliminate the LITES signal. Experimental results are shown in Figure 7. The maximum IP-QEPAS 2f signal amplitude was measured as 52.95 μV. It is proven that the signal amplitude of 77.11 μV was generated from IP-QEPAS and LITES together. Compared to traditional QEPAS, IP-SQEDS had a signal enhancement of nearly three times. It can be calculated that the minimum detection limit (MDL) of the H2O IP-SQEDS sensor was ~14.55 ppm.

4. Conclusions

In summary, this paper proposed a method of IP-SQEDS for the first time, which combines IP-QEPAS and LITES by using a single QTF. H2O with a volume concentration of 1.73% was selected as the target gas and the absorption line located at 1368.60 nm (7306.74 cm−1) was chosen. A standard, commercially available QTF with a resonant frequency of 30,702.4 Hz and a Q factor of 12,330 was adopted in the experiments. The maximum 2f signal amplitude of IP-SQEDS was measured as 77.11 μV, while that of the traditional QEPAS was 27.24 μV. In addition, a slim tin foil was chosen as an obstacle and placed near the bottom of the QTF for eliminating only the LITES signal. It is proven that the signal of 77.11 μV contained both IP-QEPAS and LITES. Compared to traditional QEPAS, this IP-SQEDS sensor possessed a simply constructed and compact structure and resulted in a signal enhancement of nearly three times. In the future, on the premise of maintaining the U-shaped structure of QTFs, further improvements in the performance of IP-SQEDS can be expected by optimizing the structure of the QTF, such as the length of the two prongs and the size or form of uncoated quartz between them.

Author Contributions

Validation, investigation and writing—original draft preparation, T.L.; methodology, S.Q.; discussion, Z.L.; writing—review and editing, supervision, Y.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 62022032, 61875047 and 61505041), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China (Grant No. YQ2019F006), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Heilongjiang Province Postdoctoral Foundation (Grant No. LBH-Q18052).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

LASLaser Absorption Spectroscopy
PASPhotoacoustic Spectroscopy
QTFQuartz Tuning Fork
QEPASQuartz-Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy
IP-QEPASIn-plane Quartz-Enhanced Photoacoustic Spectroscopy
LITESLight-induced Thermoelastic Spectroscopy
IP-SQEDSIn-plane Single-Quartz-Enhanced Dual Spectroscopy

References

  1. Milde, T.; Hoppe, M.; Tatenguem, H.; Mordmüller, M.; O’Gorman, J.; Willer, U.; Schade, W.; Sacher, J. QEPAS sensor for breath analysis: A behavior of pressure. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, C120–C127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Svanberg, E.K.; Larsson, J.; Rasmussen, M.; Larsson, M.; Leander, D.; Bergsten, S.; Bood, J.; Greisen, G.; Fellman, V. Changes in pulmonary oxygen content are detectable with laser absorption spectroscopy: Proof of concept in newborn piglets. Pediatr. Res. 2021, 89, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, T.; Zhang, G.; Liu, X.; Gao, G.Z.; Cai, T.D. A TDLAS sensor for simultaneous measurement of temperature and C2H4 concentration using a differential absorption scheme at high temperature. Front. Phys. 2020, 8, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cai, T.D.; Gao, G.Z.; Wang, M.R.; Wang, G.S.; Liu, Y.; Gao, X.M. Simultaneous measurements of temperature and CO2 concentration employing diode laser absorption near 2.0 μm. Appl. Phys. B 2015, 118, 471–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, C.; Xu, L.J. Laser absorption spectroscopy for combustion diagnosis in reactive flows: A review. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2019, 54, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhang, L.S.; Lee, C.S.; Zhang, R.Q.; Chen, L.F. Spatial and temporal evaluation of long term trend (2005–2014) of OMI retrieved NO2 and SO2 concentrations in Henan Province, China. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 154, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ma, Y.F.; Lewicki, R.; Razeghi, M.; Tittel, F.K. QEPAS based ppb-level detection of CO and N2O using a high power CW DFB-QCL. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 1008–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Liu, X.N.; Ma, Y.F. Sensitive carbon monoxide detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy with a fiber-coupled multipass cell. Chin. Opt. Lett. 2022, 20, 031201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cui, Z.L.; Zhang, X.X.; Cheng, Z.; Li, Y.L.; Xiao, H. Quantitative analysis of SO2, H2S and CS2 mixed gases based on ultraviolet differential absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2019, 215, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ma, Y.F.; Hong, Y.H.; Qiao, S.D.; Lang, Z.T.; Liu, X.N. H-shaped acoustic micro-resonator based quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2022, 47, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sampaolo, A.; Menduni, C.; Patimisco, P.; Giglio, M.; Passaro, V.M.N.; Dong, L.; Wua, H.P.; Tittel, F.K.; Spagnolo, V. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy for hydrocarbon trace gas detection and petroleum exploration. Fuel 2020, 277, 118118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hodgkinson, L.; Tatam, R.P. Optical gas sensing: A review. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2013, 24, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kosterev, A.A.; Bakhirkin, Y.A.; Curl, R.F.; Tittel, F.K. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2002, 27, 1902–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zheng, H.D.; Liu, Y.H.; Lin, H.Y.; Liu, B.; Gu, X.H.; Li, D.Q.; Huang, B.C.; Wu, Y.C.; Dong, L.P.; Zhu, W.G.; et al. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy employing pilot line manufactured custom tuning forks. Photoacoustics 2020, 17, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Spagnolo, V.; Patimisco, P.; Sampaolo, A.; Giglio, M.; Dong, L.; Tittel, F.K. Recent advances in quartz enhanced photoacoustic sensing. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2018, 5, 011106. [Google Scholar]
  16. Hu, Y.Q.; Qiao, S.D.; He, Y.; Lang, Z.T.; Ma, Y.F. Quartz-enhanced photoacoustic-photothermal spectroscopy for trace gas sensing. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 5121–5127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ma, Y.F.; Tong, Y.; He, Y.; Jin, X.G.; Tittel, F.K. Compact and sensitive mid-infrared all-fiber quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy sensor for carbon monoxide detection. Opt. Express 2019, 27, 9302–9312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Y.F.; He, Y.; Yu, X.; Chen, C.; Sun, R.; Tittel, F.K. HCl ppb-level detection based on QEPAS sensor using a low resonance frequency quartz tuning fork. Sens. Actuator B 2016, 233, 388–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Chen, X.Y.; Feng, X.C.; Liu, X.J.; Zeng, X.Q.; Xu, Y. Low-cost quartz tuning fork based methane sensor for coal mine safety applications. Sens. Actuators B 2019, 295, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.F.; Qiao, S.D.; Patimisco, P.; Sampaolo, A.; Wang, Y.; Tittel, F.K.; Spagnolo, V. In-plane quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 061101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ma, Y.F.; He, Y.; Tong, Y.; Yu, X.; Tittel, F.K. Quartz-tuning-fork enhanced photothermal spectroscopy for ultra-high sensitive trace gas detection. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 32103–32110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. He, Y.; Ma, Y.F.; Tong, Y.; Yu, X.; Tittel, F.K. Ultra-high sensitive light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy sensor with a high Q-factor quartz tuning fork and a multipass cell. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 1904–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, Q.D.; Chang, J.; Cong, Z.H.; Wang, Z.L. Application of quartz tuning fork in photodetector based on photothermal effect. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1592–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, Y.F.; He, Y.; Patimisco, P.; Sampaolo, A.; Qiao, S.D.; Yu, X.; Tittel, F.K.; Spagnolo, V. Ultra-high sensitive trace gas detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy and a custom quartz tuning fork. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2020, 116, 011103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dello Russo, S.; Zifarelli, A.; Patimisco, P.; Sampaolo, A.; Wei, T.T.; Wu, H.P.; Dong, L.; Spagnolo, V. Light-induced thermo-elastic effect in quartz tuning forks exploited as a photodetector in gas absorption spectroscopy. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 19074–19084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Qiao, S.D.; He, Y.; Ma, Y.F. Trace gas sensing based on single-quartz-enhanced photoacoustic-photothermal dual spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2021, 46, 2449–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ma, Y.F.; Hu, Y.H.; Qiao, S.D.; Lang, Z.T.; Liu, X.N.; He, Y.; Spagnolo, V. Quartz tuning forks resonance frequency matching for laser spectroscopy sensing. Photoacoustics 2022, 25, 100329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Liu, X.N.; Qiao, S.D.; Ma, Y.F. Highly sensitive methane detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy with a 2.33 μm diode laser and adaptive Savitzky-Golay filtering. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lang, Z.T.; Qiao, S.D.; He, Y.; Ma, Y.F. Quartz tuning fork-based demodulation of an acoustic signal induced by photo-thermo-elastic energy conversion. Photoacoustics 2021, 22, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, L.; Zheng, C.T.; Zhang, M.H.; Zheng, K.Y.; Zheng, J.; Song, Z.W.; Li, X.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.D.; Tittel, F.K. Long-distance in-situ methane detection using near-infrared light-induced thermo-elastic spectroscopy. Photoacoustics 2021, 21, 100230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiao, S.D.; Ma, Y.F.; He, Y.; Patimisco, P.; Sampaolo, A.; Spagnolo, V. Ppt level carbon monoxide detection based on light-induced thermoelastic spectroscopy exploring custom quartz tuning forks and a mid-infrared QCL. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 25100–25108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lou, C.G.; Chen, H.J.; Li, X.T.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yao, J.Q.; Ma, Y.F.; Chang, C.; Liu, X.L. Graphene oxide and polydimethylsiloxane coated quartz tuning fork for improved sensitive near-and mid-infrared detection. Opt. Express 2021, 29, 20190–20204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lou, G.G.; Yang, X.; Li, X.T.; Chen, H.J.; Chang, C.; Liu, X.L. Graphene-Enhanced Quartz Tuning Fork for Laser-Induced Thermoelastic Spectroscopy. IEEE Sens. J. 2021, 8, 9819–9824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, K.; Guo, X.Y.; Yi, H.M.; Chen, W.D.; Zhang, W.J.; Gao, X.M. Off-beam quartz-enhanced photoacoustic spectroscopy. Opt. Lett. 2009, 34, 1594–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Gordon, I.E.; Rothman, L.S.; Hill, C.; Kochanov, R.V.; Tan, Y.; Bernath, P.F.; Birk, M.; Boudon, V.; Campargue, A.; Chance, K.V.; et al. The HITRAN 2016 molecular spectroscopic database. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2017, 203, 3–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Functional block diagram: (a) QEPAS; (b) LITES.
Figure 1. Functional block diagram: (a) QEPAS; (b) LITES.
Sensors 22 01035 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of experimental design: (a) IP-SQEDS; (b) IP-QEPAS; (c) traditional QEPAS.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of experimental design: (a) IP-SQEDS; (b) IP-QEPAS; (c) traditional QEPAS.
Sensors 22 01035 g002
Figure 3. Simulations of line strength based on the HITRAN 2016 database.
Figure 3. Simulations of line strength based on the HITRAN 2016 database.
Sensors 22 01035 g003
Figure 4. Output characteristics of the 1368.60 nm CW-DFB fiber-coupled diode laser: (a) output wavenumber as a function of injection current at four different temperatures; (b) optical output power as a function of injection current at four different temperatures.
Figure 4. Output characteristics of the 1368.60 nm CW-DFB fiber-coupled diode laser: (a) output wavenumber as a function of injection current at four different temperatures; (b) optical output power as a function of injection current at four different temperatures.
Sensors 22 01035 g004aSensors 22 01035 g004b
Figure 5. The frequency-response curve of the QTF. These data have been normalized and fitted by a Lorentz function.
Figure 5. The frequency-response curve of the QTF. These data have been normalized and fitted by a Lorentz function.
Sensors 22 01035 g005
Figure 6. IP-SQEDS signal amplitude as a function of modulation current depth (H2O concentration was 1.73%).
Figure 6. IP-SQEDS signal amplitude as a function of modulation current depth (H2O concentration was 1.73%).
Sensors 22 01035 g006
Figure 7. 2f signals of IP-SQEDS, IP-QEPAS and traditional QEPAS.
Figure 7. 2f signals of IP-SQEDS, IP-QEPAS and traditional QEPAS.
Sensors 22 01035 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liang, T.; Qiao, S.; Lang, Z.; Ma, Y. Highly Sensitive Trace Gas Detection Based on In-Plane Single-Quartz-Enhanced Dual Spectroscopy. Sensors 2022, 22, 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031035

AMA Style

Liang T, Qiao S, Lang Z, Ma Y. Highly Sensitive Trace Gas Detection Based on In-Plane Single-Quartz-Enhanced Dual Spectroscopy. Sensors. 2022; 22(3):1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031035

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liang, Tiantian, Shunda Qiao, Ziting Lang, and Yufei Ma. 2022. "Highly Sensitive Trace Gas Detection Based on In-Plane Single-Quartz-Enhanced Dual Spectroscopy" Sensors 22, no. 3: 1035. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031035

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop