Next Article in Journal
Joint Semi-Blind Self-Interference Cancellation and Equalisation Processes in 5G QC-LDPC-Encoded Short-Packet Full-Duplex Transmissions
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Load Carriage on Postural Control and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters during Level and Uphill Walking
Previous Article in Journal
Leveraging Computational Intelligence Techniques for Defensive Deception: A Review, Recent Advances, Open Problems and Future Directions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Visualization-Driven Time-Series Extraction from Wearable Systems Can Facilitate Differentiation of Passive ADL Characteristics among Stroke and Healthy Older Adults
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 22
Issue 6
10.3390/s22062203
Review Report
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Validity and Reliability of the Insole3 Instrumented Shoe Insole for Ground Reaction Force Measurement during Walking and Running

Sensors 2022, 22(6), 2203; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062203
by Leora A. Cramer 1, Markus A. Wimmer 1,2, Philip Malloy 1,3, Joan A. O’Keefe 2, Christopher B. Knowlton 1 and Christopher Ferrigno 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2022, 22(6), 2203; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22062203
Submission received: 24 February 2022 / Revised: 8 March 2022 / Accepted: 9 March 2022 / Published: 11 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Sensors for Assessment of Gait in Older Adults)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

lines 27-32: please fill in the data: ”Citation: Lastname, F.; Lastname, F.; Lastname, F. Title.” (on page 1, left)

lines 33-81 (pp. 1-2): please arrange the text with a Justified alignment (instead of the text aligned left, as it is now)

lines 83, 93, 103 etc.: please follow the MDPI guidelines concerning the layout of the subchapters

line 149: the phrase should end with a full stop.

lines 189-342: the same problem with the alignment

line 212: in the columns for ”Absolute agreement”, the ending parantheses for ICC(3,k) and F(10,10) appear on the next line; moreover, there is a blank space that should be eliminated: (F 10,10).

line 344: ”Author utions” - to be replaced, probably with ”Authors' contributions” or ”Contributions of each author”

Otherwise, overall I think that the contributions of the paper are clearly developed and presented. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

In this paper, the authors evaluated whether the Insole3 is a valid and reliable alternative to force plates for measuring vGRF. Eleven healthy participants walked overground at slow and moderately-paced speeds and ran at a moderate pace while collecting vGRF simultaneously from a force plate (3,000 Hz) and Insole3 (100 Hz). The results indicate that Insole3 may be suitable for older adults in clinical and home settings. This article is clear, concise, and suitable for the scope of the journal. Several small suggestions are supplied:

1. Suggest the authors give more detail about the results in Fig.2.

2. Suggest the authors give more detail about the results about vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) time plots from force plate (black) and Insole3 data (red) versus during run.

3. Suggest authors improve the introduction part with other monitoring technologies such as：

Fiber Bragg Based Sensors for Foot Plantar Pressure Analysis 10.1007/978-3-030-29196-9_1

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop