Resilient Consensus Control Design for DC Microgrids against False Data Injection Attacks Using a Distributed Bank of Sliding Mode Observers
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
No more comments.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer #1,
We would like to thank you for accepting our manuscript. We are greatly appreciative of the time you have spent in the review, and we feel that the suggested changes have improved the standard of the paper significantly.
Reviewer 2 Report
The revised version of the paper is much better. Therefore, I suggest the paper for publication. However, the summary of innovation points in the introduction is not clear enough. Please pay attention.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer #2,
We would like to thank you for accepting our manuscript. We are greatly appreciative of the time you have spent in the review, and we feel that the suggested changes have improved the standard of the paper significantly. We have thoroughly re-reviewed the manuscript and corrected any errors we came across.
Reviewer 3 Report
Although I do not wish to raise too many unnecessary comments to the authors at this stage, I have to say that the revised version is not publishable in this journal. In this following, I would like to clarify why it is the case.
1. First, I am still concerned about the theoretical correctness of the presented Theorem. The authors did not clearly answer my question raised in last round of review. This is also related to Reviewer 2's comment.
2. All my previous comments were not properly addressed. In particular, key features of the proposed algorithm were not reflected.
Author Response
Dear Reviewer #3,
Thank you very much for your insightful comments. We have prepared an extensive answer in the attached document on all your suggestions and comments. Hope this will satisfy you.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 3 Report
I appreciate the authors' effort in revising the paper. I have no further comments, and would like to recommend this paper for publication.