Next Article in Journal
Estimated Nucleotide Reconstruction Quality Symbols of Basecalling Tools for Oxford Nanopore Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Contributions to Unsupervised Online Misalignment Detection and Bumper Error Compensation for Automotive Radar
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

An Innovative Approach for Removing Stripe Noise in Infrared Images

Sensors 2023, 23(15), 6786; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156786
by Xiaohang Zhao 1,2, Mingxuan Li 1, Ting Nie 1, Chengshan Han 1 and Liang Huang 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2023, 23(15), 6786; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23156786
Submission received: 13 June 2023 / Revised: 13 July 2023 / Accepted: 28 July 2023 / Published: 29 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensing and Imaging)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In this work, the author propose a new method to improve the image with stripe noise. The image is significantly improve compared with traditional method. This paper is a good  reference for the researchers in this area. It seens acceptable to publish in Sensors. I have a small question on the technical detail. In page 22  the comparasion on different methods is shown.  Can the author give a criteria of their method quantitatively? That means how to choose a certain method for a cetain situation.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is of interest. However, some changes are needed before the next round of revision. In particular, I’m referring to:

^ The Introduction section is missing the discussion of an important paper recently published, which fits the core of the paper under review, i.e.: DOI 10.1080/17686733.2020.1786640

^ At the end of the “Introduction” section, please explain briefly how the paper will be developed in the subsequent sections.

^ The paper needs to be checked accurately from the English point of view. See, e.g., line 154 on page 4: “…if a infrared image…” -> It should be “an image.” However, this is only an example of many reported in the paper!

^ Fig. 1b, c, d: What do the X, Y, and Z axes represent? The same can be said about Fig. 6a.

^ The infrared images shown in the paper, in which spectral range of the “infrared” were collected?

^ X-axis of Fig. 10a, b should be λ2 and λ3.

^ A couple of red rectangles above page 20 should be deleted and positioned correctly.

^ What happens when a surface has a very low emissivity value? For example, could you try an aluminum surface as a background of polished metallic objects (with complex 3D surfaces)?

 

The paper needs to be checked accurately from the English point of view. See, e.g., line 154 on page 4: “…if a infrared image…” -> It should be “an image.” However, this is only an example of many reported in the paper!

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop