An Innovative Approach for Removing Stripe Noise in Infrared Images
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
In this work, the author propose a new method to improve the image with stripe noise. The image is significantly improve compared with traditional method. This paper is a good reference for the researchers in this area. It seens acceptable to publish in Sensors. I have a small question on the technical detail. In page 22 the comparasion on different methods is shown. Can the author give a criteria of their method quantitatively? That means how to choose a certain method for a cetain situation.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is of interest. However, some changes are needed before the next round of revision. In particular, I’m referring to:
^ The Introduction section is missing the discussion of an important paper recently published, which fits the core of the paper under review, i.e.: DOI 10.1080/17686733.2020.1786640
^ At the end of the “Introduction” section, please explain briefly how the paper will be developed in the subsequent sections.
^ The paper needs to be checked accurately from the English point of view. See, e.g., line 154 on page 4: “…if a infrared image…” -> It should be “an image.” However, this is only an example of many reported in the paper!
^ Fig. 1b, c, d: What do the X, Y, and Z axes represent? The same can be said about Fig. 6a.
^ The infrared images shown in the paper, in which spectral range of the “infrared” were collected?
^ X-axis of Fig. 10a, b should be λ2 and λ3.
^ A couple of red rectangles above page 20 should be deleted and positioned correctly.
^ What happens when a surface has a very low emissivity value? For example, could you try an aluminum surface as a background of polished metallic objects (with complex 3D surfaces)?
The paper needs to be checked accurately from the English point of view. See, e.g., line 154 on page 4: “…if a infrared image…” -> It should be “an image.” However, this is only an example of many reported in the paper!
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf