Next Article in Journal
FlyDetector—Automated Monitoring Platform for the Visual–Motor Coordination of Honeybees in a Dynamic Obstacle Scene Using Digital Paradigm
Next Article in Special Issue
Investigating the Joint Amplitude and Phase Imaging of Stained Samples in Automatic Diagnosis
Previous Article in Journal
An Improved Performance Radar Sensor for K-Band Automotive Radars
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Automatic Detection of Focal Cortical Dysplasia Using MRI: A Systematic Review

Sensors 2023, 23(16), 7072; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167072
by David Jiménez-Murillo 1, Andrés Eduardo Castro-Ospina 1,*, Leonardo Duque-Muñoz 1, Juan David Martínez-Vargas 2, Jazmín Ximena Suárez-Revelo 3, Jorge Mario Vélez-Arango 3 and Maria de la Iglesia-Vayá 4,5
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(16), 7072; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23167072
Submission received: 8 July 2023 / Revised: 2 August 2023 / Accepted: 7 August 2023 / Published: 10 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Data and Imaging: Sensing, Understanding and Applications)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper provides a comprehensive review of focal cortical dysplasia detection.

Some details of this review need to be clarified.
1. Line 80: Please elaborate on the difference between this view and the existing review [10].
2. In all tables, Do these methods use the same benchmark dataset for a fair comparison?

 

This review just "described" each paper one by one without insightful comments. In addition, this review lacks discussions in the following aspects:
1. What are the major benchmark datasets used in this research area?
2. What are performance metrics?
3. What is the future research direction?

NA

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors incorporated all the points raised in the first round.

Reviewer 2 Report

The revision is good, there is no further comment.

NA

Back to TopTop