Internet of Medical Things and Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Requirements, Challenges, and Research Directions
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- A.
- Providing insight into the Healthcare 4.0 paradigm and its main features.
- B.
- Introducing the main requirement of Healthcare 4.0 systems and IoMT.
- C.
- Providing the key enabling technologies of Healthcare 4.0 and IoMT.
- D.
- Discussing the research directions for Healthcare 4.0 and IoMT.
2. E-Health
2.1. Challenges of E-Health
- (1)
- Timeliness
- (2)
- Security and Privacy
- (3)
- Cost efficient
- (4)
- Effective care
- (5)
- Equity
- (6)
- Patient-centered healthcare
2.2. Main Categories of E-Health Systems
3. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN)
3.1. Characteristics of WBAN
- (1)
- Medical sensors: These small, low-power devices collect data from the human body. They can be attached to the skin, implanted in tissues, or ingested by the patient.
- (2)
- Wireless transceivers: The hardware responsible for sending and receiving data between the sensors and the central monitoring system. Various wireless communication technologies, including Bluetooth, Zigbee, or Wi-Fi, can be supported by the WBAN transceivers.
- (3)
- Central monitoring system: The network sink, i.e., the coordinator device receives and processes the data from the distributed medical sensors. It has higher communication capabilities and supports multiple communication interfaces. A body control unit (BCU), a body gateway, or a sink are all terms used to describe this equipment. A personal digital assistant (PDA) or smartphone can sometimes be used instead of a dedicated unit. The primary goal of this unit is to collect all of the data collected by the sensors and actuators and convey it to the user (patient, nurse, etc.) over an external gateway. This gadget has a power unit, a huge processor, vast memory, and a transmitter.
- General treatment and diagnosis application: WBAN has dominated the medical industry by providing diverse services. It improves the efficiency of medical activities, including remote patient monitoring, prompt health status, notification, and emergency phoning, which can be carried out anytime and from any location. Some of the research’s potential medical applications are listed below.
- Electronic healthcare monitoring for older people: This WBAN application aims to improve the health of older people who live alone in their homes. An intelligent home monitoring system based on medical sensors can be used to observe and evaluate the fitness of older people in their homes. Temperature sensors and other body sensors are used to detect any abnormalities in the daily activities of older people, including sleeping, walking, eating, bathing, and even operating. The network coordinator is notified if an irregularity occurs, and the collected data is sent to medical personnel.
- Fighting COVID-19: The WBAN has many applications for fighting COVID-19. By reducing the physical presence of patients, remote monitoring of COVID-19 may significantly lower healthcare costs and boost hospital capacity. Biomedical parameters such as temperature, heartbeat, respiration rate, and oxygen saturation must be collected, analyzed, and forwarded to medical personnel to monitor the symptoms [28]. WBAN can be easily deployed to assist such applications.
3.2. Available Medical Sensors
- (a)
- Patient data: This includes personal information of the patient, their medical history, vital signs, and any other relevant information related to their health.
- (b)
- Clinical data: This includes data from medical devices, vital signs monitoring systems, and other clinical instruments used in patient care.
- (c)
- Electronic health records (EHRs): EHRs store digital versions of a patient’s medical record, which includes information about their medical history, laboratory test results, and any other information related to their health.
- (d)
- Wearable data: Wearable devices, such as smartwatches, fitness trackers, and health monitors, provide data on a patient’s activity levels, sleep patterns, and overall health.
- (e)
- Social determinants of health: This includes factors such as a patient’s socioeconomic status, living conditions, and lifestyle choices that can impact their health.
- Wearable health trackers include activity, heart rate, and blood pressure monitors. Table 2 presents the features of the common market available wearable watches.
- Connected health sensors and monitors include blood glucose meters, pulse oximeters, and electrocardiography (ECG). These sensors enable real-time monitoring of medical conditions, such as cardiac disease, diabetes, and respiratory disease.
- Smart pill sensors monitor medication adherence and provide feedback to healthcare providers.
- Telehealth and virtual care devices that enable remote consultations, diagnosis, and treatment of patients.
- Endoscopic pills are small, swallowable devices used in medical diagnosing.
- A.
- Sensors for pulse rate
- (1)
- Optical sensor: It uses light to detect changes in blood volume. A light-emitting diode (LED) and a photodetector measure the reflected light. When blood flow increases during each heartbeat, the amount of light reflected in the sensor changes, allowing the pulse rate to be calculated.
- (2)
- Piezoelectric sensor: It uses piezoelectric materials that generate voltage when subjected to mechanical pressure or vibration. In the context of pulse rate measurement, a piezoelectric sensor can be placed on the skin or a blood vessel, and the mechanical vibrations caused by each heartbeat can be converted into an electrical signal to determine the pulse rate.
- (3)
- Capacitive sensor: It measures changes in capacitance between two electrodes caused by the pulsating blood flow. These sensors typically involve placing the electrodes on the skin or blood vessels, and as the blood flow varies with each heartbeat, the capacitance also changes.
- (4)
- ECG sensor: It can provide information about the heart’s electrical activity. ECG sensor detects the electrical signals generated by the heart’s contractions and relaxations. Various parameters, including heart rate, can be derived from these signals.
- B.
- Pulse oximeters
- C.
- PPG sensors
- D.
- Temperature sensors
- E.
- Blood pressure sensors
- F.
- EEG sensors
- G.
- EMG sensors
3.3. Wireless Communication Technologies
- Bluetooth: Bluetooth technology is widely adopted for connecting medical devices and wearables to smartphones, tablets, and other computing devices. It allows for the transmission of health data, remote device control, and seamless integration with mobile health applications.
- Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE): It is a wireless communication technology designed to provide short-range, low-power connectivity between devices. BLE is a subset of the Bluetooth technology standard and is optimized for applications that require low power consumption and periodic data exchanges. BLE is specifically designed for energy-efficient communication, making it ideal for devices that operate on battery power. This allows BLE-enabled devices to have long battery life, which is essential for applications such as wearables, medical devices, and IoT sensors. BLE provides short-range communication typically within a range of up to 10 m. This limited range is well-suited for medical applications that require local and proximity-based interactions between devices. Compared to classic Bluetooth, BLE has a lower data transfer rate. It is suitable for transmitting small bursts of data, such as sensor readings, notifications, or control commands.
- Zigbee: Zigbee is a low-power, short-range wireless technology well-suited for medical IoT applications. It is an IEEE 802.15.4-based. Due to its energy efficiency and reliable connectivity, it is often used in remote patient monitoring systems, smart home healthcare devices, and hospital equipment monitoring systems.
- Wi-Fi: Wi-Fi is a popular wireless method for establishing a direct internet connection. It utilizes the 2.4 GHz frequency spectrum frequently. The family of IEEE 802.11x standards is referred to as “Wi-Fi.” It achieves a theoretical coverage of 20 to 100 m indoors. Also, it allows for a maximal transfer rate of more than 54 Mbps. In numerous ways, it outperforms many existing communication interfaces. Wi-Fi fits well for audio and video applications due to its higher bandwidth requirements. Deploying Wi-Fi for IoT applications consumes a lot of energy, which is one of its primary disadvantages. It is not feasible for IoT sensors to run on batteries because of their high power consumption. Additionally, it is especially vulnerable to background interference and channel obstruction. Wi-Fi is, without a doubt, essential for high-speed connections. However, it has significant limitations and disadvantages in the context of the IoT, rendering it less popular. Nonetheless, many researchers have proposed healthcare systems incorporating Wi-Fi in monitoring patients’ vitals. Wi-Fi provides high-speed wireless connectivity over short to medium distances. It is extensively used in healthcare settings for connecting medical devices, including wearable health trackers, patient monitoring systems, and smart hospital infrastructure.
- Cellular technology: Cellular networks provide wide-area coverage and are utilized for medical IoT applications that require long-range communication, such as telemedicine and remote patient monitoring. The evolution of cellular networks from 3G to 5G facilitates higher data rates, lower latency, and improved connectivity.
- LoRaWAN: LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) is a low-power, long-range wireless technology suitable for medical IoT deployments that span large areas, such as smart hospitals or smart cities. It enables connectivity with low-cost, battery-operated devices and supports efficient data transmission in scenarios where power consumption is critical.
- 6LoWPAN: It is the IPv6 transmission over a low-power wireless personal area network. It is cheap, energy efficient, and easy to tailor to your needs. With these features, it can be used for various IoT tasks. It supports IPv6 and a variety of IEEE 802.15.4 protocols for data exchange.
4. Mian Features and Challenges of IoMT and Healthcare 4.0
4.1. Specifications and Requirements of IoMT and Healthcare 4.0
- Better healthcare services: IoMT devices can monitor patients’ health and vital signs, enabling healthcare providers to detect and address prospective problems. These processes are provided over a robust system since IoT has evolved in the past years.
- Cost-efficient: By reducing hospital readmissions, minimizing unnecessary interventions, and optimizing the utilization of medical resources, IoMT devices can help reduce the cost of healthcare. The infrastructure of IoMT is cost-efficient, and the system does not involve medical workers all over time since the system automatically analyzes the results.
- Enhanced patient engagement: IoMT devices can increase patient engagement in healthcare by allowing patients to monitor their health, assess their progress, and communicate with their healthcare providers.
- Improved decision-making: Healthcare 4.0 can provide healthcare providers with real-time data and insights, allowing them to make more informed decisions and provide patients with more personalized care.
- Better interaction efficiency: Healthcare 4.0 can assist healthcare providers in streamlining their workflows, enhancing communication, and increasing the efficiency of patient care.
- Advanced data analytics: The advanced data analytics capability is crucial to Healthcare 4.0. It enables the identification of anomalies and patterns that can assist in providing enhanced personalized care, thereby leading to better patient outcomes.
- Ultra-reliable communication: It is a critical aspect of medical data transferred over Healthcare 4.0, enabling dependable, safe, and operational communication among healthcare actors. It ensures that data is communicated without any loss or breakdowns, providing reliable diagnosis, treatment decisions to physicians, patients, and caregivers. Ultra-reliable communication ensures that critical medical data, including vital signs, lab results, and medication information, are transmitted accurately and rapidly to the right recipients. Moreover, it can enable timely communication of alarm notifications, emergency calls, and other urgent messages, which can help prevent medical errors and reduce the risk of adverse events. Summing up, ultra-reliable communications are crucial in improving patient safety and clinical outcomes by enabling reliable and real-time communication between healthcare providers, patients, and medical devices.
- High network availability: The high network availability of Healthcare 4.0 data refers to the healthcare system’s ability to access and utilize data in real-time and without interruption. Having a highly available network ensures that healthcare providers always have access to patient records, medical images, and other vital data, which can save lives in critical situations.
- Interoperability: Interoperability is essential in the Healthcare 4.0 environment. This necessitates that all systems and devices communicate with one another, allowing for the sharing and analysis of data. Healthcare 4.0 systems significantly rely on the ability to share patient data across systems.
- Information consent: Patients should have control over their health data and how it is disseminated, per informed consent. Before using patients’ data, healthcare organizations must ensure that patients are completely informed about how it will be utilized and obtain their consent.
- High network flexibility: Network flexibility is a key component of Healthcare 4.0, which indicates the ability of healthcare providers to adapt their networks quickly and easily to changing patient needs and technological advancements. This is particularly important as Healthcare 4.0 involves the integration of various technologies, including robotics, AI, the IoT, and big data analytics. The ability to add these technologies quickly and seamlessly to the healthcare network is essential in order to improve patient care, productivity, and overall healthcare quality.
- Security and privacy: Most countries store and transmit personal health information (PHI) electronically. Due to the vast amount of health information gathered and shared via the Internet, the key concerns of healthcare operators are privacy and security. There is a risk of system-wide attacks on health data due to the open transmission channel. To defend against such attacks, researchers employ a variety of cryptographic strategies. Privacy includes the ability of only authorized users to access health information about specific patients, as well as the retrieval, use, and disclosure of patient information to an interloper. This can be achieved by implementing various schemes and their corresponding rules.
4.2. Challenges with IoMT and Healthcare 4.0
- A.
- Data privacy and security
- Data breaches: The digitization and sharing of vast amounts of patient data increases the risk of data breaches. Cybercriminals may attempt to gain unauthorized access to sensitive health information, leading to identity theft, fraud, or other malicious activities.
- Internal threats: Healthcare organizations must also be wary of internal threats. Employees with access to patient data may intentionally or unintentionally misuse or disclose confidential information.
- Interoperability risks: Integrating various systems, devices, and applications can create vulnerabilities in data exchange, leaving data exposed during transmission or storage. Ensuring secure communication and data sharing among different platforms is crucial.
- IoT vulnerabilities: The growing use of IoMT devices in healthcare presents security challenges. Weaknesses in these devices can be exploited, compromising patient data and device functionality.
- Lack of standardization: Inconsistencies in security practices and protocols across different healthcare organizations can lead to weaknesses that attackers may exploit. The lack of standardized security measures can hinder overall system security.
- Ransomware attacks: Healthcare facilities have increasingly become targets of ransomware attacks where hackers encrypt patient data, making it inaccessible until a ransom is paid. Such attacks can disrupt patient care and compromise data integrity.
- Inadequate security measures: Some healthcare providers may not implement robust security measures due to cost constraints or lack of awareness. Insufficient security measures can expose data to potential breaches.
- Data sharing with third parties: Healthcare providers often share patient data with third-party vendors and partners for various purposes. Ensuring the security of data during such transfers is crucial to prevent data leaks.
- -
- Implementing robust cybersecurity measures, encryption, access controls, and intrusion detection methods.
- -
- Conducting regular security audits and risk assessments to identify and mitigate vulnerabilities.
- -
- Educating employees about data security best practices and raising awareness of potential threats.
- -
- Adopting standardized security protocols and collaborating with industry peers to share best practices.
- -
- Employing secure application development practices for software used in healthcare.
- -
- Regularly updating and patching software and systems to address known security vulnerabilities.
- -
- Restricting data access to authorized personnel only and monitoring access logs for suspicious activities.
- -
- Establishing clear data-sharing agreements with third-party vendors to ensure data protection compliance.
- B.
- Bandwidth
- Upgrading network infrastructure: Healthcare providers need to invest in high-speed and reliable network infrastructure to accommodate the increasing demands of data-intensive applications.
- Prioritizing critical data traffic: Implementing quality of service (QoS) protocols can help prioritize critical healthcare data through time-sensitive traffic, ensuring that vital patient information receives priority during peak periods.
- Edge computing: Deploying edge computing solutions can reduce the strain on centralized networks by processing data closer to the source, thereby decreasing the volume of data that needs to be transferred over the network.
- Data compression: Implementing data compression techniques can help reduce data size, easing the burden on the network and improving efficiency.
- Load balancing: Load balancing techniques distribute network traffic across multiple servers or resources, preventing congestion and ensuring even data distribution.
- Bandwidth monitoring and management: Continuous monitoring of network bandwidth usage helps identify bottlenecks and allows for proactive capacity planning and management. Also, applying AI-based methods at the core of the network can assist bandwidth management.
- C.
- Energy
- -
- Energy-efficient medical devices: Healthcare organizations should prioritize the adoption of energy-efficient medical devices and technology. Manufacturers should design products with power-saving features and low standby power consumption.
- -
- Battery technology improvements: Ongoing research and development in battery technology can lead to longer-lasting and more energy-dense batteries for medical devices and mobile equipment.
- -
- Energy management techniques: Implementing energy management methods can help optimize energy use, track consumption, and ensure reliable power supply during emergencies.
- -
- Renewable energy adoption: Investigating novel methods for the integration of renewable energy sources. Also, developing robust models and systems for wireless charging can assist the integration of green energy in Healthcare 4.0.
- D.
- Massive data
- E.
- Ethical concerns
5. Key Enabling Technologies of Healthcare 4.0
5.1. 5G Communications
- -
- Telemedicine services: 5G can revolutionize telemedicine by enabling high-quality video conferencing and real-time collaboration between healthcare professionals. The low latency and stable connections can offer a more immersive and interactive virtual healthcare experience, leading to better diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care.
- -
- Remote surgeries and robotic-assisted operations: 5G’s ultra-reliable and low-latency communications can enable remote surgeries and robotic-assisted procedures. Surgeons can perform complex operations from a remote location using high-resolution video feeds and haptic feedback. This can bridge the gap between medical expertise and underserved areas, where access to specialized healthcare is limited.
- -
- Precision medicine services: 5G empowers precision medicine initiatives by enabling fast and reliable transmission of large genomic datasets, facilitating quicker analysis and personalized treatment plans. It supports real-time collaboration among researchers and clinicians for faster advancements in precision medicine.
- -
- Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) services: 5G can power immersive AR/VR applications in healthcare. This technology can be used for medical training, patient education, pain management, and even remote collaborative surgeries, fostering better outcomes and experiences for both patients and healthcare professionals.
5.2. AI
5.3. Cloud Computing
5.4. Distributed Edge Computing
5.5. Blockchain
- Data security and integrity: Blockchain provides a transparent and immutable ledger where data transactions can be securely recorded. It utilizes cryptographic algorithms to create a tamper-proof and transparent record of all transactions or changes made to the data. Once a block is added to the chain, it cannot be altered without consensus among the network participants. This ensures that patient data remains unchanged and maintains its integrity. Blockchain ensures the integrity and authenticity of medical data IoMT devices generate, reducing the risk of tampering or unauthorized access. This strengthens data security and privacy, which is critical in healthcare.
- Interoperability and standardization: IoMT devices often come from different manufacturers and use various data formats and protocols. A decentralized and standardized framework can be established with blockchain, allowing seamless data exchange and interoperability between different IoMT devices. This promotes collaboration, efficiency, and better patient care.
- Decentralization: By leveraging distributed ledger technology, blockchain eliminates the need for a central authority to govern data transactions. This can enhance trust among stakeholders within the IoMT ecosystem, such as patients, healthcare providers, insurers, and regulators. The decentralized nature of blockchain ensures that no single entity controls the stored data, reducing the potential for abuse or manipulation.
- Data control and consent management: Patients can have greater control over their health data through blockchain. They can grant or revoke access permissions to their medical records, ensuring data privacy and enabling consent-based data sharing. This empowers patients to have a say in how their data is used, fostering trust and transparency.
- Data sharing: Smart contracts are self-executing agreements embedded in the blockchain that can be used to define access rights and data-sharing permissions. These contracts can automate consent management, ensuring that data is only shared with authorized entities or for specific purposes. It eliminates the need for intermediaries and strengthens data privacy.
- Patient-centricity: Patients can have greater control over their healthcare information through blockchain. Patients can grant specific healthcare providers or researchers permission to access their data, enhancing patient privacy and consent management.
- Supply chain integrity: In the healthcare industry, blockchain can improve the traceability and transparency of medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and supplies. It enables the verification of the entire supply chain journey, ensuring authenticity, reducing counterfeit products, and improving patient safety.
5.6. Device-to-Device (D2D) Communications
5.7. Related Work
6. Research Directions
- (a)
- Emphasis on medical data analysis and management: There is great demand for developing robust data management strategies to handle the vast amount of data IoMT devices generate. This includes ensuring data security and privacy and using advanced analytics tools to derive valuable insights from the data. With the massive amount of data generated by IoMT devices, there is a need for advanced data analytics techniques and AI algorithms to extract meaningful insights. The research aims to develop predictive models, machine learning algorithms, and AI-driven decision support systems to improve patient outcomes, disease prevention, and healthcare operations.
- (b)
- Security and privacy improvement: As healthcare systems become increasingly connected, ensuring the security and privacy of medical data is crucial. Research focuses on developing robust security measures, encryption techniques, and protocols to protect patient information and prevent unauthorized access. Data security is a primary concern for medical data due to the sensitivity of medical records. Encryption, secure networks, and access controls can help protect data from unauthorized access. Regular security audits and firmware updates are crucial in maintaining a secure environment. Researchers are interested in deploying decentralized schemes, e.g., blockchain, to assist medical data security. Also, lightweight security algorithms are a new direction to meet the energy requirements of medical sensors. With the vast amount of personal health data being collected, there is a risk of unauthorized sharing or use of this information. Implementing strong privacy policies, acquiring informed consent, and applying data anonymization techniques can help protect patient privacy. It is important to ensure compliance with relevant data protection regulations. Trust management techniques are a promising way introduced for achieving these requirements.
- (c)
- Interoperability: IoMT devices and systems often come from different manufacturers and may use proprietary protocols, leading to interoperability challenges. Research focuses on developing standardized frameworks and protocols to ensure seamless communication, data exchange, and integration of IoMT devices and systems across healthcare settings.
- (d)
- Edge computing solutions: IoMT generates a large volume of real-time data, which can be challenging to transmit and process in traditional cloud-based architectures. Researchers have been investigating the deployment of mobile edge computing and fog computing techniques to assist IoMT and Healthcare 4.0. This includes developing network structures based on edge units, proposing edge intelligence schemes to assist medical data, and developing offloading schemes that meet network requirements.
- (e)
- Quality of experience improvement: Understanding the user experience, acceptance, and adoption of IoMT devices among healthcare professionals and patients is crucial. The research investigates usability, user interface design, and human factors considerations to ensure that IoMT technologies are user-friendly, efficient, and meet the needs of healthcare stakeholders.
- (f)
- Ethical and legal considerations: There are ethical and legal implications for patient privacy, data ownership, consent, and accountability. Research explores the ethical and legal frameworks, guidelines, and policies necessary to govern the use of IoMT in healthcare settings, ensuring transparency, fairness, and adherence to ethical principles.
7. Ethical Implications of Healthcare 4.0
- A.
- Potential for discrimination against certain groups of people:
- Data and algorithmic biasing: If the data used to train algorithms is biased or incomplete, the AI systems may make decisions that perpetuate existing healthcare disparities. For instance, if historical data disproportionately represents certain groups, the AI might provide less accurate or inadequate diagnoses and treatments for other underrepresented groups. Thus, if certain groups of people are underrepresented in the training data used to develop AI algorithms, the algorithms might not perform as accurately for those groups. This could lead to biased treatment recommendations or misdiagnoses [114]. In addition, if access to healthcare technologies or AI-based services is restricted based on socioeconomic status or geographic location, this could exacerbate existing healthcare disparities.
- Privacy and consent: As digital technologies collect vast amounts of personal health data; individuals’ privacy becomes a major concern. Healthcare 4.0 should address many privacy and consent issues. Mitigating privacy risks and ensuring secure data management in Healthcare 4.0 systems can be achieved in several ways, as presented in Table 13. However, Table 14 presents the potential ways to ensure proper patient consent [115,116].
- Health insurance discrimination: Health data could potentially be used by insurance companies to assess risk profiles and adjust premiums accordingly, disadvantaging individuals with specific health conditions or genetic predispositions.
- B.
- Misuse of personal health data
- C.
- Job loss of healthcare workers
8. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Gupta, A.; Singh, A. Healthcare 4.0: Recent Advancements and Futuristic Research Directions. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2023, 129, 933–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vyas, S.; Bhargava, D.; Khan, S.; Bhargava, D. Healthcare 4.0: A Systematic Review and Its Impact over Conventional Healthcare System. In Artificial Intelligence for Health 4.0: Challenges and Applications; River Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 1–17. ISBN 9781003373582. [Google Scholar]
- Shamshad, F.; Khan, S.; Zamir, S.W.; Khan, M.H.; Hayat, M.; Khan, F.S.; Fu, H. Transformers in Medical Imaging: A Survey. Med. Image Anal. 2023, 88, 102802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grivcheva-Panovska, V.; Craig, T.J.; Longhurst, H.; Bara, N.; Panovska, I. Global Perceptions of the Current and Future Impacts of COVID-19 on Hereditary Angioedema Management. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022, 43, e1–e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, S.; Dua, A.; Gupta, S. Role of Emerging Technologies in Future IoT-Driven Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: A Survey, Current Challenges and Future Directions. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2023, 14, 361–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beheshti, L.; Kalankesh, L.R.; Doshmangir, L.; Farahbakhsh, M. Telehealth in Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Perspect. Health Inf. Manag. 2022, 19, 1n. [Google Scholar]
- Ashfaq, Z.; Rafay, A.; Mumtaz, R.; Hassan Zaidi, S.M.; Saleem, H.; Raza Zaidi, S.A.; Mumtaz, S.; Haque, A. A Review of Enabling Technologies for Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Ecosystem. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2022, 13, 101660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, R.; Mehrotra, D.; Chandra, S. Potential of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Applications in Building a Smart Healthcare System: A Systematic Review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 2022, 12, 302–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ge, H.; Li, L.; Zhang, D.; Ma, F. Applications of Digital Medicine in Oncology: Prospects and Challenges. Cancer Innov. 2022, 1, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Usak, M.; Kubiatko, M.; Shabbir, M.S.; Viktorovna Dudnik, O.; Jermsittiparsert, K.; Rajabion, L. Health Care Service Delivery Based on the Internet of Things: A Systematic and Comprehensive Study. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2020, 33, e4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calegari, L.P.; Fettermann, D.C. A Review of E-Health Technologies Applications. Int. J. Bioinform. Res. Appl. 2022, 18, 318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinyemi, O.R.; Sibiya, M.N.; Oladimeji, O. Communication Model Enhancement Using Electronic Health Record Standard for Tertiary Hospital. SA J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 24, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodriguez Santana, I.; Mason, A.; Gutacker, N.; Kasteridis, P.; Santos, R.; Rice, N. Need, Demand, Supply in Health Care: Working Definitions, and Their Implications for Defining Access. Health Econ. Policy Law 2023, 18, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, C.; Wu, X.; Qi, H. A Comprehensive Analysis of E-Health Literacy Research Focuses and Trends. Healthcare 2021, 10, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hussey, P. Introduction to Nursing Informatics. In Health Informatics; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 1–13. ISBN 9783030587390. [Google Scholar]
- Singh, S.; Prasad, D. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN): A Review of Schemes and Protocols. Mater. Today 2022, 49, 3488–3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razdan, S.; Sharma, S. Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): Overview, Emerging Technologies, and Case Studies. IETE Tech. Rev. 2022, 39, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qadri, Y.A.; Nauman, A.; Zikria, Y.B.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Kim, S.W. The Future of Healthcare Internet of Things: A Survey of Emerging Technologies. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor 2020, 22, 1121–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanchaichujit, J.; Tan, A.; Meng, F.; Eaimkhong, S. Healthcare 4.0: Next Generation Processes with the Latest Technologies, 1st ed.; Springer: Singapore, 2019; ISBN 9789811381133. [Google Scholar]
- Tortorella, G.L.; Fogliatto, F.S.; Mac Cawley Vergara, A.; Vassolo, R.; Sawhney, R. Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Challenges and Research Directions. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 31, 1245–1260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbar, M.S.; Hussain, Z.; Sheng, M.; Shankaran, R. Wireless Body Area Sensor Networks: Survey of MAC and Routing Protocols for Patient Monitoring under IEEE 802.15.4 and IEEE 802.15.6. Sensors 2022, 22, 8279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preethichandra, D.M.G.; Piyathilaka, L.; Izhar, U.; Samarasinghe, R.; De Silva, L.C. Wireless Body Area Networks and Their Applications—A Review. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 9202–9220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xing, L.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Q. Reliability of Wireless Body Area Networks. In Springer Series in Reliability Engineering; Springer Nature Switzerland: Cham, Switzerland, 2023; pp. 83–101. ISBN 9783031288586. [Google Scholar]
- Zhong, L.; He, S.; Lin, J.; Wu, J.; Li, X.; Pang, Y.; Li, Z. Technological Requirements and Challenges in Wireless Body Area Networks for Health Monitoring: A Comprehensive Survey. Sensors 2022, 22, 3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, S.; Zeadally, S.; Fahim, H.; He, B. Medical Sensors and Their Integration in Wireless Body Area Networks for Pervasive Healthcare Delivery: A Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2022, 22, 3860–3877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatti, D.S.; Saleem, S.; Imran, A.; Iqbal, Z.; Alzahrani, A.; Kim, H.; Kim, K.-I. A Survey on Wireless Wearable Body Area Networks: A Perspective of Technology and Economy. Sensors 2022, 22, 7722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumari Mohanty, R.; Prakash Sahoo, S.; Ranjan Kabat, M. A Survey on Emerging Technologies in Wireless Body Area Network. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Virtual, 3–5 October 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Karmakar, K.; Saif, S.; Biswas, S.; Neogy, S. A Priority Based Routing Protocol to Improve Quality of Service (QoS) in Wireless Body Area Network for COVID and Diabetic Patients. In Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering; Springer: Singapore, 2022; pp. 179–190. ISBN 9789811691539. [Google Scholar]
- Sridhar, A.P.; Lakshmi; Mohana, T.K. Wearable Devices in Healthcare 4.0: Effects, Trends and Challenges. SSRN Electron. J. 2021, 2020, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatas, M.; Eriskin, L.; Deveci, M.; Pamucar, D.; Garg, H. Big Data for Healthcare Industry 4.0: Applications, Challenges and Future Perspectives. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 200, 116912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, L.; Eastburn, M.; Smirk, J.; Zhao, H. Smart Chemical Sensor and Biosensor Networks for Healthcare 4.0. Sensors 2023, 23, 5754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ray, P.P.; Dash, D.; Kumar, N. Sensors for Internet of Medical Things: State-of-the-Art, Security and Privacy Issues, Challenges and Future Directions. Comput. Commun. 2020, 160, 111–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- do Nascimento, L.M.S.; Bonfati, L.V.; Freitas, M.L.B.; Mendes Junior, J.J.A.; Siqueira, H.V.; Stevan, S.L., Jr. Sensors and Systems for Physical Rehabilitation and Health Monitoring—A Review. Sensors 2020, 20, 4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apple Watch. Available online: https://www.apple.com/sa/apple-watch-ultra/ (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 5. Available online: https://www.samsung.com/us/watches/galaxy-watch5/ (accessed on 28 June 2023).
- Huawei Watch GT. Available online: https://consumer.huawei.com/sa-en/wearables/watch-gt-runner/?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIrrHS_8Pn_wIVfAIGAB18bQbvEAAYASAAEgKID_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- Fitbit Versa 4. Available online: https://www.fitbit.com/global/us/products/smartwatches/versa4 (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- Withings Watches. Available online: https://www.withings.com/eu/en/watches (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5. Available online: https://www.mi.com/global/product/mi-smart-band-5/ (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- Donida Labati, R.; Piuri, V.; Rundo, F.; Scotti, F. Photoplethysmographic Biometrics: A Comprehensive Survey. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2022, 156, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, S.-T.; Chen, W.-H.; Lin, Y.-H. A Pulse Rate Detection Method for Mouse Application Based on Multi-PPG Sensors. Sensors 2017, 17, 1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bent, B.; Goldstein, B.A.; Kibbe, W.A.; Dunn, J.P. Investigating Sources of Inaccuracy in Wearable Optical Heart Rate Sensors. NPJ Digit. Med. 2020, 3, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okunlola, O.E.; Lipnick, M.S.; Batchelder, P.B.; Bernstein, M.; Feiner, J.R.; Bickler, P.E. Pulse Oximeter Performance, Racial Inequity, and the Work Ahead. Respir. Care 2022, 67, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davies, H.J.; Williams, I.; Peters, N.S.; Mandic, D.P. In-Ear SpO2: A Tool for Wearable, Unobtrusive Monitoring of Core Blood Oxygen Saturation. Sensors 2020, 20, 4879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dormishian, A.; Schott, A.; Aguilar, A.C.; Bancalari, E.; Claure, N. Pulse Oximetry Reliability for Detection of Hypoxemia under Motion in Extremely Premature Infants. Pediatr. Res. 2023, 93, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masi, G.; Amprimo, G.; Ferraris, C.; Priano, L. Stress and Workload Assessment in Aviation—A Narrative Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 3556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, X.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Z.; Ji, X.; Chen, H. Gesture-Related Two-Factor Authentication for Wearable Devices via PPG Sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 2023, 23, 13114–13126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Přibil, J.; Přibilová, A.; Frollo, I. Comparison of Three Prototypes of PPG Sensors for Continual Real-Time Measurement in Weak Magnetic Field. Sensors 2022, 22, 3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cai, J.; Du, M.; Li, Z. Flexible Temperature Sensors Constructed with Fiber Materials. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2022, 7, 2101182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, H.; Li, S.; He, Z.; Wu, Y.; Gao, Z.; Hu, C.; Hu, S.; Wang, S.; Liu, C.; Shang, J.; et al. Dual Mode Strain–Temperature Sensor with High Stimuli Discriminability and Resolution for Smart Wearables. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2214907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mishra, S.; Mohanty, S.; Ramadoss, A. Functionality of Flexible Pressure Sensors in Cardiovascular Health Monitoring: A Review. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 2495–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rohan, R.; Venkadeshwaran, K. Measurement of Human Blood Pressure Using MEMS Pressure Sensor. In Proceedings of the 2022 9th International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom), New Delhi, India, 23–25 March 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 99–103. [Google Scholar]
- Soufineyestani, M.; Dowling, D.; Khan, A. Electroencephalography (EEG) Technology Applications and Available Devices. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, J. The Feature, Performance, and Prospect of Advanced Electrodes for Electroencephalogram. Biosensors 2023, 13, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Niso, G.; Romero, E.; Moreau, J.T.; Araujo, A.; Krol, L.R. Wireless EEG: A Survey of Systems and Studies. Neuroimage 2023, 269, 119774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Värbu, K.; Muhammad, N.; Muhammad, Y. Past, Present, and Future of EEG-Based BCI Applications. Sensors 2022, 22, 3331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, W.; Zou, K.; Zhao, Y.; Xi, N. Detection of Human Action Intention by Electromyography (EMG). In Proceedings of the 2022 12th International Conference on CYBER Technology in Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), Changbai Mountain, China, 27–31 July 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 750–754. [Google Scholar]
- Botter, A.; Vieira, T.; Carbonaro, M.; Cerone, G.L.; Hodson-Tole, E.F. Electrodes’ Configuration Influences the Agreement between Surface EMG and B-Mode Ultrasound Detection of Motor Unit Fasciculation. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 98110–98120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roopa, J.; Geetha, K.S.; Satyanarayana, B.S. Fabrication of Polymer Based Flexible Sensors for EoG and EMG Applications. Mater. Today 2022, 48, 697–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, Y.; Wu, J.; Fan, Y.; Wang, J.; Niu, J.; Gu, F.; Shen, S. MSEva: A Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Evaluation System Based on EMG Signals. ACM Trans. Sens. Netw. 2023, 19, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lv, Z.; Li, Y. Wearable Sensors for Vital Signs Measurement: A Survey. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2022, 11, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pulse Oximeter and Heart-Rate Sensor IC for Wearable Health. Available online: https://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/max30100.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2023).
- MAX30102 Heart Rate Sensor Oxygen Pulse. Available online: https://store.fut-electronics.com/products/pulse-oximeter-spo2-heart-rate-sensor-max30100 (accessed on 10 June 2023).
- Non-Invasive Blood Pressure Monitors. Available online: https://sensorsandpower.angst-pfister.com/en/products/pressure-sensors-load-sensors/product/ap3-ag3-dedicated-low-noise-nibp-sensor-non-invasive-blood-pressure-monitors/ (accessed on 10 June 2023).
- Pressure Sensor MPS20N0040D-S. Available online: https://softroboticstoolkit.com/files/sorotoolkit/files/mps20n0040d-s_datasheet.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2023).
- Pulse Sensor. Available online: https://components101.com/sensors/pulse-sensor (accessed on 20 June 2023).
- AD8232 ECG Module. Available online: https://components101.com/modules/ad8232-ecg-module (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- Heartbeat Sensor Module. Available online: https://protosupplies.com/product/heartbeat-sensor-module/ (accessed on 25 June 2023).
- AgaMatrix Jazz Wireless 2 Glucose Meter. Available online: https://agamatrix.com/store/agamatrix-jazz-wireless-2.html (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- ECG/EKG Monitoring System. Available online: https://getwellue.com/products/heart-health-monitor?variant=39378992529450 (accessed on 2 August 2023).
- Gudnavar, A.; Naregal, K.; Patil, B. Wireless Body Area Network: Communication Standards and Radio Technologies Employed. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE North Karnataka Subsection Flagship International Conference (NKCon), Vijaypur, India, 20–21 November 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Khujamatov, K.; Akhmedov, N.; Reypnazarov, E.; Khasanov, D.; Lazarev, A. Device-to-Device and Millimeter Waves Communication for 5G Healthcare Informatics. In Blockchain Applications for Healthcare Informatics; Tanwar, S., Ed.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2022; pp. 181–211. ISBN 9780323906159. [Google Scholar]
- Drăgulinescu, A.M.C.; Manea, A.F.; Fratu, O.; Drăgulinescu, A. LoRa-Based Medical IoT System Architecture and Testbed. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 126, 25–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghori, M.R.; Wan, T.-C.; Sodhy, G.C. Bluetooth Low Energy Mesh Networks: Survey of Communication and Security Protocols. Sensors 2020, 20, 3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rejeb, A.; Rejeb, K.; Treiblmaier, H.; Appolloni, A.; Alghamdi, S.; Alhasawi, Y.; Iranmanesh, M. The Internet of Things (IoT) in Healthcare: Taking Stock and Moving Forward. Internet Things 2023, 22, 100721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tortorella, G.L.; Fogliatto, F.S.; Espôsto, K.F.; Mac Cawley Vergara, A.; Vassolo, R.; Tlapa Mendoza, D.; Narayanamurthy, G. Measuring the Effect of Healthcare 4.0 Implementation on Hospitals’ Performance. Prod. Plan. Control 2022, 33, 386–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haleem, A.; Javaid, M.; Pratap Singh, R.; Suman, R. Medical 4.0 Technologies for Healthcare: Features, Capabilities, and Applications. Internet Things Cyber-Phys. Syst. 2022, 2, 12–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qahtan, S.; Yatim, K.; Zulzalil, H.; Osman, M.H.; Zaidan, A.A.; Alsattar, H.A. Review of Healthcare Industry 4.0 Application-Based Blockchain in Terms of Security and Privacy Development Attributes: Comprehensive Taxonomy, Open Issues and Challenges and Recommended Solution. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2023, 209, 103529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hathaliya, J.J.; Tanwar, S. An Exhaustive Survey on Security and Privacy Issues in Healthcare 4.0. Comput. Commun. 2020, 153, 311–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajadevi, R.; Venkatachalam, K.; Masud, M.; AlZain, M.A.; Abouhawwash, M. Proof of Activity Protocol for IoMT Data Security. Comput. Syst. Sci. Eng. 2023, 44, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasool, R.U.; Ahmad, H.F.; Rafique, W.; Qayyum, A.; Qadir, J. Security and Privacy of Internet of Medical Things: A Contemporary Review in the Age of Surveillance, Botnets, and Adversarial ML. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 2022, 201, 103332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pandey, A.K.; Khan, A.I.; Abushark, Y.B.; Alam, M.M.; Agrawal, A.; Kumar, R.; Khan, R.A. Key Issues in Healthcare Data Integrity: Analysis and Recommendations. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 40612–40628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar Sharma, D.; Sreenivasa Chakravarthi, D.; Ara Shaikh, A.; Al Ayub Ahmed, A.; Jaiswal, S.; Naved, M. The Aspect of Vast Data Management Problem in Healthcare Sector and Implementation of Cloud Computing Technique. Mater. Today 2023, 80, 3805–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Devi, D.H.; Duraisamy, K.; Armghan, A.; Alsharari, M.; Aliqab, K.; Sorathiya, V.; Das, S.; Rashid, N. 5G Technology in Healthcare and Wearable Devices: A Review. Sensors 2023, 23, 2519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalil, S.; Abdo, J.B. Healthcare 4.0: Technologies and Policies. In 5G Impact on Biomedical Engineering; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2022; pp. 3–18. ISBN 9781003058434. [Google Scholar]
- Alenoghena, C.O.; Ohize, H.O.; Adejo, A.O.; Onumanyi, A.J.; Ohihoin, E.E.; Balarabe, A.I.; Okoh, S.A.; Kolo, E.; Alenoghena, B. Telemedicine: A Survey of Telecommunication Technologies, Developments, and Challenges. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2023, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R. 5G Technology for Healthcare: Features, Serviceable Pillars, and Applications. Intell. Pharm. 2023, 1, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rawat, B.; Bist, A.S.; Supriyanti, D.; Elmanda, V.; Sari, S.N. AI and Nanotechnology for Healthcare: A Survey. APTISI Trans. Manag. (ATM) 2022, 7, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chaddad, A.; Peng, J.; Xu, J.; Bouridane, A. Survey of Explainable AI Techniques in Healthcare. Sensors 2023, 23, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Subhan, F.; Mirza, A.; Su’ud, M.B.M.; Alam, M.M.; Nisar, S.; Habib, U.; Iqbal, M.Z. AI-Enabled Wearable Medical Internet of Things in Healthcare System: A Survey. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 1394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, F.; Sunyaev, A. Context Matters: A Review of the Determinant Factors in the Decision to Adopt Cloud Computing in Healthcare. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 48, 120–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Rab, S.; Suman, R.; Khan, I.H. Evolutionary Trends in Progressive Cloud Computing Based Healthcare: Ideas, Enablers, and Barriers. Int. J. Cogn. Comput. Eng. 2022, 3, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hartmann, M.; Hashmi, U.S.; Imran, A. Edge Computing in Smart Health Care Systems: Review, Challenges, and Research Directions. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2022, 33, e3710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mehta, I.; Anand, A. Use of Fog Computing in Health Care. In Bio-Inspired Optimization in Fog and Edge Computing Environments; Auerbach Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2022; pp. 91–116. ISBN 9781003322931. [Google Scholar]
- Awad, A.I.; Fouda, M.M.; Khashaba, M.M.; Mohamed, E.R.; Hosny, K.M. Utilization of Mobile Edge Computing on the Internet of Medical Things: A Survey. ICT Express 2023, 9, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Villarreal, E.R.D.; Garcia-Alonso, J.; Moguel, E.; Alegria, J.A.H. Blockchain for Healthcare Management Systems: A Survey on Interoperability and Security. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 5629–5652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saranya, R.; Murugan, A. A Systematic Review of Enabling Blockchain in Healthcare System: Analysis, Current Status, Challenges and Future Direction. Mater. Today 2023, 80, 3010–3015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, I.; Abdullah, S.; Ahmed, A. IoT-Fog-Based Healthcare 4.0 System Using Blockchain Technology. J. Supercomput. 2023, 79, 3999–4020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Suraci, C.; Pizzi, S.; Molinaro, A.; Araniti, G. MEC and D2D as Enabling Technologies for a Secure and Lightweight 6G EHealth System. IEEE Internet Things J. 2022, 9, 11524–11532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishor, A.; Chakraborty, C. Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things Based Healthcare 4.0 Monitoring System. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2022, 127, 1615–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boudko, S.; Abie, H. Adaptive Cybersecurity Framework for Healthcare Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2019 13th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), Oslo, Norway, 8–10 May 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Hurley, D.; Popescu, G.H. Medical Big Data and Wearable Internet of Things Healthcare Systems in Remotely Monitoring and Caring for Confirmed or Suspected COVID-19 Patients. Am. J. Med. Res. 2021, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sivasangari, A.; Lakshmanan, L.; Ajitha, P.; Deepa, D.; Jabez, J. Big Data Analytics for 5G-Enabled IoT Healthcare. In Blockchain for 5G-Enabled IoT; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 261–275. ISBN 9783030674892. [Google Scholar]
- Bhatt, V.; Chakraborty, S. Real-Time Healthcare Monitoring Using Smart Systems: A Step towards Healthcare Service Orchestration Smart Systems for Futuristic Healthcare. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Systems (ICAIS), Coimbatore, India, 25–27 March 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 772–777. [Google Scholar]
- Shukla, N.; Gandhi, C. Efficient Resource Discovery and Sharing Framework for Fog Computing in Healthcare 4.0. In Fog Computing for Healthcare 4.0 Environments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 387–407. ISBN 9783030461966. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P.M.; Gandhi, U.D. Enhanced DTLS with CoAP-Based Authentication Scheme for the Internet of Things in Healthcare Application. J. Supercomput. 2020, 76, 3963–3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, R.; Gupta, M.; Nayyar, A.; Sharma, N. Adoption of Fog Computing in Healthcare 4.0. In Fog Computing for Healthcare 4.0 Environments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–36. ISBN 9783030461966. [Google Scholar]
- Puri, V.; Kataria, A.; Sharma, V. Artificial Intelligence-powered Decentralized Framework for Internet of Things in Healthcare 4.0. Trans. Emerg. Telecommun. Technol. 2021, e4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanwar, S.; Parekh, K.; Evans, R. Blockchain-Based Electronic Healthcare Record System for Healthcare 4.0 Applications. J. Inf. Secur. Appl. 2020, 50, 102407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Krishnamurthi, R.; Nayyar, A.; Sharma, K.; Grover, V.; Hossain, E. A Novel Smart Healthcare Design, Simulation, and Implementation Using Healthcare 4.0 Processes. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 118433–118471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nair, A.R.; Tanwar, S. Fog Computing Architectures and Frameworks for Healthcare 4.0. In Fog Computing for Healthcare 4.0 Environments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 55–78. ISBN 9783030461966. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, K.; Modi, P.; Bhatia, J. Data Processing and Analytics in FC for Healthcare 4.0. In Fog Computing for Healthcare 4.0 Environments; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 131–154. ISBN 9783030461966. [Google Scholar]
- Uke, N. Healthcare 4.0 Enabled Lightweight Security Provisions for Medical Data Processing. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. (Turcomat) 2021, 12, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gerke, S.; Minssen, T.; Cohen, G. Ethical and Legal Challenges of Artificial Intelligence-Driven Healthcare. In Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare; Bohr, A., Memarzadeh, K., Eds.; Elsevier: San Diego, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 295–336. ISBN 9780128184387. [Google Scholar]
- Price, W.N., II; Cohen, I.G. Privacy in the Age of Medical Big Data. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cherif, E.; Bezaz, N.; Mzoughi, M. Do Personal Health Concerns and Trust in Healthcare Providers Mitigate Privacy Concerns? Effects on Patients’ Intention to Share Personal Health Data on Electronic Health Records. Soc. Sci. Med. 2021, 283, 114146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chernyshev, M.; Zeadally, S.; Baig, Z. Healthcare Data Breaches: Implications for Digital Forensic Readiness. J. Med. Syst. 2019, 43, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Konttila, J.; Siira, H.; Kyngäs, H.; Lahtinen, M.; Elo, S.; Kääriäinen, M.; Kaakinen, P.; Oikarinen, A.; Yamakawa, M.; Fukui, S.; et al. Healthcare Professionals’ Competence in Digitalisation: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Nurs. 2019, 28, 745–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Feature | WBAN |
---|---|
Reliability |
|
Energy |
|
Human-centric |
|
Availability |
|
Mobility |
|
Scalability |
|
Deployment |
|
Topology |
|
Bandwidth |
|
Commercial Name | Structure | Technical Specification | Biological Measurement |
---|---|---|---|
Apple Watch [34] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Samsung Galaxy Watch-5 [35] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Huawei Watch GT, Huawei Band [36] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Fitbit Versa [37] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Withings [38] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
Xiaomi Mi Smart Band 5 [39] |
|
|
|
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
Feature | Selection Criteria |
---|---|
Accuracy and reliability |
|
Signal quality |
|
Comfort and usability |
|
Sensing technology |
|
Compatibility |
|
Environmental considerations |
|
Cost |
|
Regulatory compliance |
|
Category | Available Market | Features and Technical Specification |
---|---|---|
Blood oxygen sensors | MAX30100 Heart Rate Oxygen Pulse Sensor [62] |
|
MAX30102 Heart Rate Oxygen Pulse Sensor [63] |
| |
Blood pressure sensors | Blood pressure sensor [64] |
|
Pressure Sensor MPS20N0040D-S [65] |
| |
Heart rate sensors | Pulse Sensor [66] |
|
AD8232 ECG Sensor [67] |
| |
Heart rate sensor IR [68] |
| |
Blood glucose sensors | Wireless glucose meter [69] |
|
ECG | ECG/EKG Monitoring [70] |
|
Challenge | Issues with Healthcare 4.0 |
---|---|
High energy consumption technologies | Healthcare 4.0 systems incorporate a wide range of energy-intensive technologies, such as medical imaging equipment, laboratory instruments, and data centers. The cumulative energy demand can be significant, leading to increased operational costs and environmental impact. |
Battery life of medical devices | Healthcare 4.0 relies on battery-operated medical sensors and wearable devices for real-time communication and access to patient information. Limited battery life can be a concern during extended shifts or emergencies, affecting the continuity of care. Modern communication networks, e.g., IoMT, demands ten years of battery life. |
Energy efficiency of medical devices | Medical devices may lack energy-efficient designs. As these devices remain in use for extended periods, their higher energy consumption contributes to overall energy challenges in healthcare settings. |
Power management | The proliferation of IoMT devices in Healthcare 4.0 requires careful power management. Frequent battery replacements or recharging protocols can be burdensome and impact device utilization. |
Renewable energy integration | Incorporating renewable energy sources, e.g., solar, into Healthcare 4.0 facilities can help reduce reliance on traditional energy sources. However, implementation complexities, including wireless power transfer challenges, present challenges. |
Challenge | Issues with Healthcare 4.0 |
---|---|
Data volume | Healthcare 4.0 generates vast volumes of data from massive deployed medical devices. Managing and processing such large datasets can strain existing storage and computing resources. |
Data diversity | Healthcare data comes in various formats, including structured data (e.g., EHRs), unstructured data (e.g., medical imaging), and streaming data from IoMT devices. Integrating and analyzing this diverse data is complex and requires advanced data processing techniques. |
Data generation rate | The speed at which data is generated and needs to be processed in real-time can pose traditional data processing systems. Real-time analysis is critical for immediate clinical decisions and timely interventions. |
Data analytics and insights | Extracting meaningful insights from large and complex healthcare datasets requires sophisticated data analytics tools and expertise. Analyzing data effectively can be resource-intensive and time-consuming. |
Data storing and archiving | Storing and managing historical healthcare data can be challenging due to its volume and the need for long-term retention for research, legal, and compliance purposes. |
Challenges | Issues with Healthcare 4.0 | Key Solutions |
---|---|---|
Energy |
|
|
Bandwidth |
|
|
Network availability and reliability |
|
|
End-to-end latency |
|
|
Security |
|
|
Scalability |
|
|
Massive data |
|
|
Benefit | Role in Healthcare 4.0 |
---|---|
Faster (ultra-low latency) communications | With its high data transfer speeds and low latency, 5G can enhance real-time communications between healthcare professionals, allowing for faster transmission of critical patient data, remote consultations, and telemedicine services. |
Ultra-high reliability | Ultra-high reliability is one of the key characteristics of 5G communications. Relying on 5G’s ultra-reliable connections ensures seamless communication between healthcare professionals and support staff. This provides a robust foundation for Healthcare 4.0, enabling transformative advancements in remote care, real-time monitoring, telemedicine, and precision medicine. |
Ultra-high availability | The ultra-high availability of 5G communications allows Healthcare 4.0 systems to consistently deliver services with very minimal downtime or disruptions. It emphasizes the network’s ability to remain operational and accessible to users and applications for an extended period. This is an important issue with medical services due to the emergency of most medical services. |
High scalability | Scalability is a critical issue with Healthcare 4.0 due to the evolution and growth of medical devices and technologies. 5G communications can significantly increase the scalability of Healthcare 4.0 by enabling seamless integration and expansion of advanced technologies and healthcare services. |
Integration with the Internet infrastructure | 5G communications can assist in integrating medical sensors into the Internet and supporting remote services via a 5G cellular interface. Many remote Healthcare 4.0 applications have problems with the appropriate communication interface between devices and the Internet. These problems can be solved using 5G communications. |
Extended coverage | By utilizing 5G technology, healthcare providers can extend their reach to remote and underserved areas. |
Data security and privacy | The implementation of 5G prioritizes robust security measures to protect patient privacy and prevent data breaches. |
Implication | Issue with Healthcare 4.0 |
---|---|
Interference | The high-frequency spectrum used by 5G can be susceptible to interference from physical objects, such as walls or medical equipment. Ensuring reliable coverage and minimizing potential signal disruptions is crucial. |
Cost | The deployment of 5G networks and associated hardware can be expensive. Healthcare organizations need to assess the cost implications and potential return on investment when considering 5G implementation. |
Infrastructure | 5G networks rely on a dense infrastructure of small cells and base stations. Implementing this infrastructure within healthcare facilities may require significant infrastructure upgrades. |
Regulatory | The implementation of 5G in healthcare may involve compliance with specific regulations governing data privacy, patient consent, and network safety. Adhering to these regulations is essential to avoid legal and ethical issues. |
Public fears and beliefs | While 5G technology offers numerous benefits, some people have expressed concerns and fears about its deployment, especially in medical services. One of the primary fears revolves around potential health risks associated with increased exposure to electromagnetic radiation. Some individuals worry that the higher frequency and intensity of 5G signals might have adverse effects on human health. It is essential to address these fears through rigorous scientific research, transparent communication, and robust regulatory measures. |
Benefit | How It Assists Healthcare 4.0 and IoMT |
---|---|
Storage and accessibility |
|
Scalability |
|
Data backup |
|
Enhanced collaboration |
|
Cost-effectiveness |
|
Security and compliance |
|
Benefit | How It Assists Healthcare 4.0 and IoMT |
---|---|
Reducing latency |
|
Enhanced privacy and security |
|
Bandwidth optimization |
|
Reliable connectivity |
|
Real-time analytics and decision-making |
|
Cost efficiency |
|
Offline assistance |
|
Ref. | Key Enabling Technology | KPI | Medical Application | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloud Com. | Block. | AI | Big Data | 5G | Fog | MEC | |||
[100] | × | × | √ | × | × | × | × |
| Diseases prediction |
[101] | × | × | × | × | × | × | × |
| Security of medical data |
[102] | √ | × | √ | √ | × | × | × | - | Remote monitoring and caring |
[103] | × | × | √ | √ | √ | √ | × |
| Healthcare |
[104] | × | × | √ | × | × | × | × | - | Monitoring routine activities |
[105] | √ | × | × | √ | × | √ | × | - | Healthcare monitoring |
[106] | × | × | × | × | × | × | × |
| Security of medical data |
[107] | √ | × | × | × | × | √ | × | - | General |
[108] | × | × | √ | × | × | × | × |
| Remote monitoring |
[109] | × | √ | × | × | × | × | × |
| Security of medical data |
[110] | √ | √ | × | × | × | × | × |
| Security of medical data |
[111] | √ | × | × | × | × | √ | × | - | General |
[112] | × | × | √ | √ | × | √ | × | - | General |
[113] | × | √ | × | × | × | × | × |
| Security of medical data |
Issue | Potential Solution |
---|---|
Implement strong access controls | Strict user authentication mechanisms, e.g., multi-factor authentication, should be enforced to prevent unauthorized access to sensitive healthcare data. |
Encrypt sensitive data | Robust encryption algorithms to encrypt data and save patient information from being accessed or manipulated by unauthorized individuals. |
Regularly update and patch systems | Keeping software, operating systems, and network infrastructure up to date with the latest security patches. |
Conduct thorough risk assessments | Regularly assess the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the data management systems. This includes identifying potential threats, analyzing their impact, and addressing any identified risks through appropriate mitigation measures. |
Follow regulatory frameworks and compliance standards | Following regulations, e.g., HIPAA and GDPR, ensure data handling in a legally compliant and secure manner. |
Implement data anonymization techniques | Health data can be de-identified or anonymized to minimize the risk of re-identifying individuals. |
Monitor and detect security incidents | Implement robust intrusion detection systems and security monitoring tools to detect and respond to any unauthorized access or suspicious activities. |
Establish data breach response plans | Preparing and testing an incident response plan can minimize the impact of a data breach or security incident. This plan should outline steps to be taken, communication protocols, and strategies for containment and recovery. |
Issue | Potential Solution |
---|---|
Digital consent forms | Implementing digital consent forms that patients can read and sign electronically is a vital solution. These forms should clearly explain the purpose, risks, and benefits of the proposed treatment or procedure, allowing patients to make informed decisions. The system can then store and record these consents securely. |
Two-factor authentication | Using two-factor authentication methods, such as biometrics or unique codes sent to the patient’s mobile device, to verify the identity of the patient before consenting to any procedure ensures that only authorized individuals can provide consent. |
Consent management systems (CMS) | Implementing CMS allows healthcare providers to track and manage patient consent throughout the care continuum. CMS automate consent processes, track consent status, and ensure compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. |
Audit trails | Maintaining robust audit trails that record all consent-related activities, including when consent was obtained, who obtained it, and any subsequent updates or withdrawals of consent, helps establish a transparent record of patient consent. |
Education and communication | Ensuring patients are educated about their rights and the importance of informed consent is critical. Healthcare 4.0 systems can incorporate patient portals, interactive interfaces, and educational materials to facilitate patient understanding and engagement. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Osama, M.; Ateya, A.A.; Sayed, M.S.; Hammad, M.; Pławiak, P.; Abd El-Latif, A.A.; Elsayed, R.A. Internet of Medical Things and Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Requirements, Challenges, and Research Directions. Sensors 2023, 23, 7435. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177435
Osama M, Ateya AA, Sayed MS, Hammad M, Pławiak P, Abd El-Latif AA, Elsayed RA. Internet of Medical Things and Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Requirements, Challenges, and Research Directions. Sensors. 2023; 23(17):7435. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177435
Chicago/Turabian StyleOsama, Manar, Abdelhamied A. Ateya, Mohammed S. Sayed, Mohamed Hammad, Paweł Pławiak, Ahmed A. Abd El-Latif, and Rania A. Elsayed. 2023. "Internet of Medical Things and Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Requirements, Challenges, and Research Directions" Sensors 23, no. 17: 7435. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177435
APA StyleOsama, M., Ateya, A. A., Sayed, M. S., Hammad, M., Pławiak, P., Abd El-Latif, A. A., & Elsayed, R. A. (2023). Internet of Medical Things and Healthcare 4.0: Trends, Requirements, Challenges, and Research Directions. Sensors, 23(17), 7435. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23177435