Next Article in Journal
Construction of a Winter Wheat Comprehensive Growth Monitoring Index Based on a Fuzzy Degree Comprehensive Evaluation Model of Multispectral UAV Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Autonomous State Estimation and Observability Analysis for the Taiji Formation Using High-Precision Optical Sensors
Previous Article in Journal
BSEMS—A Blockchain-Based Smart Energy Measurement System
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Using DWS Optical Readout to Improve the Sensitivity of Torsion Pendulum

Sensors 2023, 23(19), 8087; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198087
by Shaoxin Wang 1,2, Heshan Liu 1,2, Lei Dai 3, Ziren Luo 1,2,4, Peng Xu 1,2,4, Pan Li 1,2, Ruihong Gao 1,2, Dayu Li 3 and Keqi Qi 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2023, 23(19), 8087; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23198087
Submission received: 4 September 2023 / Revised: 18 September 2023 / Accepted: 23 September 2023 / Published: 26 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advance of Optical Measurement Based on Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This paper described using the DWS to improve the readout noise of a torsion balance in view of applying the technique for the space GW detectors.  The experiments showed an improvement in noise reduction compared with the commercial autocollimator readout.  It would be or interest to the community.  However, it is not clearly stated if this system is something similar to the LISA system or if the scheme was first proposed here for such application.

It would be helpful to give a comparison with LISA’s readout noise floor.

Some comments embedded with the pdf file is attached. 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

The English will need to be improved.  I only marked a few places

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This manuscript reported the technique for enhancing the sensitivity of the torsion pendulum system by employing the differential wavefront sensing (DWS) optical readout and the comparative experiments were conducted. My review comments are as follows:

1. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of the technology used, multiple comparative studies and experiments were conducted, and the experimental results are shown in Figures 3, 5, and 10. However, there is a lack of description on how the comparison curve in the figure were obtained, which needs to be supplemented.

2.Figure 6 shows the experimental system in two views, but the two views seem to lack a reasonable correspondence and cannot clearly display the mechanical structure and optical path. Need to be redesigned according to standards.

Minor editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has been properly revised and it is recommended to accept.

Back to TopTop