Next Article in Journal
Cooperative Positioning Method of a Multi-UAV Based on an Adaptive Fault-Tolerant Federated Filter
Previous Article in Journal
PMIndoor: Pose Rectified Network and Multiple Loss Functions for Self-Supervised Monocular Indoor Depth Estimation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Spacecraft Segment Damage Identification Method Based on Fiber Optic Strain Difference Field Reconstruction and Norm Calculation

Sensors 2023, 23(21), 8822; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218822
by Jihong Xu 1,†, Jie Zeng 1,*,†, Binbin Chen 1, Ruixin Lu 1, Yangyang Zhu 1, Lei Qi 2 and Xiangfei Chen 3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(21), 8822; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23218822
Submission received: 7 October 2023 / Revised: 25 October 2023 / Accepted: 26 October 2023 / Published: 30 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Optical Sensors)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Comment attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

The comment includes a few examples of places that needed language revision. Please revise the manuscript thoroughly. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Due to the obsolescence of long-used space equipment and orbital stations, this work is quite relevant and is of interest to researchers who are readers of Sensors. I believe that this manuscript deserves publication in this respected journal, but I would suggest a few minor edits:

1. I would like to suggest that authors improve their explanation of the reasons why they choose FBGs. The literature review mentions distributed fiber optic sensors, but does not explain why this option is unacceptable. One of the links refers to quasi-distributed sensors. Minor breakdowns can occur not only in those locations where Bragg gratings are applied, but also in other places. Frequency domain reflectometers have achieved significant results in dynamic range and sensitivity [10.3390/s23156863], [10.1134/S0020441223050172], [10.3390/s23125515], could you be so kind as to explain why this method is unacceptable for your study.

2. The method by which probing is performed is not well described. Gratings can be interrogated in different ways, for which there are quite a few approaches. If a commercial interrogator was used, the brand must be specified. It is advisable to provide a figure (scheme or photo) for connecting the FBGs to the system.

3. The authors note that an important condition for correct registration of deformations is constant temperature. I ask you to highlight in the text the measures that made it possible to do this.

4. Some sections in the article end with figures, I recommend placing them higher, after the first mention.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop