Next Article in Journal
On Model-Based Transfer Learning Method for the Detection of Inter-Turn Short Circuit Faults in PMSM
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Colorimetric Sensing of Carbidopa in Anti-Parkinson Drugs Based on Selective Reaction with Indole-3-Carbaldehyde
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Lagrois et al. Low-to-Mid-Frequency Monopole Source Levels of Underwater Noise from Small Recreational Vessels in the St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga Critical Habitat. Sensors 2023, 23, 1674

by
Dominic Lagrois
1,*,
Camille Kowalski
1,
Jean-François Sénécal
1,
Cristiane C. A. Martins
2 and
Clément Chion
1
1
Département des Sciences Naturelles, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Ripon, QC J0V 1V0, Canada
2
Parc Marin du Saguenay-Saint-Laurent, Tadoussac, QC G0T 2A0, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(22), 9143; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229143
Submission received: 26 May 2023 / Accepted: 6 July 2023 / Published: 13 November 2023
Text Correction
There was an error in the original publication [1], that phrase is meant to indicate that there is an absence of auditory stresses.
A correction has been made to5. Discussion, Paragraph 2:
“…would have caused any specific auditory stresses…” should be “…would have caused no specific auditory stresses…”
There was an error in the original publication [1]. Conclusion #2 states that “the received noise levels [⋯] mostly fell below the St. Lawrence Estuary beluga hearing audiogram hence suggesting that they caused limited acoustic disturbance at CPA distances of a few hundreds meters”. Following the standard peer-review process, acceptation, and publication of the manuscript, it was pointed out to us that the comparison between the RLs recorded at the hydrophone and the beluga’s audiogram’s detection thresholds was not done appropriately, hence calling into question the validity of the original paper’s Conclusion #2.
Henceforth, a correction has been made to Conclusion #2:
2.
At least 31.1% of the recorded targets (14 out of 45 events) in Anse-Saint-Étienne have shown received noise levels in excess of the St. Lawrence Estuary beluga hearing audiogram, hence suggesting evidence for acoustic disturbance at CPA distances of a few hundreds meters. In those specific cases, both the beluga’s communication and echolocation bands have increased risks of auditory masking during short-to-intermediate range interactions (<600 m) (see Appendix D).
Newly added “Appendix D. Proof”, as follow,
Appendix D. Proof
To address any form of misinterpretation, we closely followed the method described by Gervaise and collaborators [53, § IV-B]. Figure A1 shows, in light gray, the RLs recorded by the hydrophone (in units of dB Hz 1 ) during CPA passage for all 45 events listed in this work’s Table 1. Critical bands of twelfth-octave are generally suited to the beluga’s hearing sensitivity [73,74]. In the frequency domain, the subtraction of critical ratios [75] from the RL twelfth-octave bands leads to a spectrum that can now be directly compared to published hearing audiograms. Positive differences (referred to as excesses), shown in Figure A1 as circle-chained lines, correspond the amount (in dB) of a signal at a given frequency that must be emitted above the audiogram to be detected.
The audiograms in Figure A1 are a mixture of auditory evoked potentials and behavioural hearing thresholds. The main objective of this work was to contribute/add to the sample of known MSLs for motorised recreational crafts (see, e.g., [56]); it is beyond its scope to determine which audiogram is better representative of the beluga’s hearing thresholds and why. In Table A2, masking was judged probable if at least four out six audiograms suggest so with a maximal signal excess required for detection above 4.8 dB (highlighted in coral), i.e., the nominal uncertainty on a single acoustic measurement [76]. All in all, 14 out of 45 events, i.e., 31.1% of our sample in Anse-Saint-Étienne, support evidence for masking at the position of the hydrophone, in addition to 5 contested events.
Figure A1. Acoustic disturbance in Anse-Saint-Étienne. Each panel (and label) corresponds to a specific event in [1]’s Table 1. At CPA, RL levels (in units of dB Hz 1 ) recorded at the hydrophone are shown in light gray. The same signal expressed in twelfth-octave bands (in units of dB) is provided in gray. Subtraction of the frequency-dependent critical ratios [75] from the twelfth-octave bands yields the black curve. Six (6) audiograms for the beluga whale are provided: red [77], orange [5], yellow [45], green [78], blue [79], and magenta [80]. Subtraction of each audiogram from the black curve gives the color-corresponding circle-chained line (referred as excesses in the text) in the lower portion of each panel. Beluga’s communication and echolocation bands are represented by the vertical dashed gray lines.
Figure A1. Acoustic disturbance in Anse-Saint-Étienne. Each panel (and label) corresponds to a specific event in [1]’s Table 1. At CPA, RL levels (in units of dB Hz 1 ) recorded at the hydrophone are shown in light gray. The same signal expressed in twelfth-octave bands (in units of dB) is provided in gray. Subtraction of the frequency-dependent critical ratios [75] from the twelfth-octave bands yields the black curve. Six (6) audiograms for the beluga whale are provided: red [77], orange [5], yellow [45], green [78], blue [79], and magenta [80]. Subtraction of each audiogram from the black curve gives the color-corresponding circle-chained line (referred as excesses in the text) in the lower portion of each panel. Beluga’s communication and echolocation bands are represented by the vertical dashed gray lines.
Sensors 23 09143 g0a1aSensors 23 09143 g0a1b
Table A2. Maximal signal excess required for detection and corresponding frequency.
Table A2. Maximal signal excess required for detection and corresponding frequency.
EventCastellote et al. [77]Erbe et al. [5]Finneran et al. [45]Klishin et al. [78]Mooney et al. [79]Sysueva et al. [80]Masking?
FrequencyExcessFrequencyExcessFrequencyExcessFrequencyExcessFrequencyExcessFrequencyExcess
(kHz)(dB)(kHz)(dB)(kHz)(dB)(kHz)(dB)(kHz)(dB)(kHz)(dB)
113.6217.2813.62
24.538.5278.51240.66?
34.8148.1376.82657.578.11215.215
420.3197.24
528.716
64.034.0226.87
74.5810.2357.21745.6615.2515.214
83.0210.82851.21151.2111.48?
93.2186.83
1036.2836.23851.22054.21036.2836.218
113.053.0236.86?
1210.8258.5712.14
1354.2730.43651.21854.21154.2730.415
148.0218.0821.51
1513.61948.34
1630.42851.21151.2111.47?
1728.79
184.0109.1317.21745.637.6312.811
197.6237.61219.22
2013.6189.13
218.1237.612
2210.216
234.314.3217.2515.21
244.0184.0384.02112.19
2551.2451.22951.21851.2851.2451.210
264.314.2217.29
274.0110.8247.6811.44
2827.1227.2627.11
2917.1218.1417.12
3038.42748.3948.3138.48?
313.012
324.3186.82
333.0112.1207.2712.10
343.8638.4277.21448.3138.48
3530.410
3638.41910.2509.13343.1209.12013.629
374.01530.43851.22354.21357.51038.417
383.0183.4377.62051.268.1813.514
3938.49
403.2818.1319.11551.2518.1418.113
413.4133.4313.41316.1115.210
4210.215
433.468.1328.11948.338.1711.48
4430.4187.23
453.8140.6227.2615.23
References
A correction has been made to References (added 8 more references based on the original 72 references):
  • 73. Erbe, C.; Farmer, D.M. A software model to estimate zones of impact on marine mammals around anthropogenic noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108, 1327–1331.
  • 74. Erbe, C.; Farmer, D.M. Zones of impact around icebreakers affecting beluga whales in the Beaufort Sea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108, 1332–1340.
  • 75. Johnson, C.S.; McManus, M.W.; Skaar, D. Masked tonal hearing thresholds in the beluga whale. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1989, 85, 2651–2654.
  • 76. Sponagle, N. Variability of Ship Noise Measurements. In Defense Research Establishment Atlantic; Technical Report; Defence Research Establishment Atlantic: Dartmouth, NS, Canada, 1988.
  • 77. Castellote, M.; Mooney, T.A.; Quakenbush, L.; Hobbs, R.; Goertz, C.; Gaglione, E. Baseline hearing abilities and variability in wild beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 217, 1682–1691.
  • 78. Klishin, V.O.; Popov, V.V.; Supin, A.Y. Hearing capabilities of a beluga whale, Delphinapterus leucas. Aquat. Mamm. 2000, 26, 212–228.
  • 79. Mooney, T.A.; Castellote, M.; Quakenbush, L.; Hobbs, R.; Gaglione, E.; Goertz, C. Variation in hearing within a wild population of beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas). J. Exp. Biol. 2018, 221, jeb171959.
  • 80. Sysueva, E.V.; Nechaev, D.I.; Popov, V.V.; Supin, A.Y. Electrophysiological audiograms in seven beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) from the Okhotsk Sea population. In Proceedings of the Meetings on Acoustics, Acoustical Society of America, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 7–11 May 2018; Volume 33, p. 010001.

Reference

  1. Lagrois, D.; Kowalski, C.; Sénécal, J.F.; Martins, C.C.A.; Chion, C. Low-to-Mid-Frequency Monopole Source Levels of Underwater Noise from Small Recreational Vessels in the St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga Critical Habitat. Sensors 2023, 23, 1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lagrois, D.; Kowalski, C.; Sénécal, J.-F.; Martins, C.C.A.; Chion, C. Correction: Lagrois et al. Low-to-Mid-Frequency Monopole Source Levels of Underwater Noise from Small Recreational Vessels in the St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga Critical Habitat. Sensors 2023, 23, 1674. Sensors 2023, 23, 9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229143

AMA Style

Lagrois D, Kowalski C, Sénécal J-F, Martins CCA, Chion C. Correction: Lagrois et al. Low-to-Mid-Frequency Monopole Source Levels of Underwater Noise from Small Recreational Vessels in the St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga Critical Habitat. Sensors 2023, 23, 1674. Sensors. 2023; 23(22):9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lagrois, Dominic, Camille Kowalski, Jean-François Sénécal, Cristiane C. A. Martins, and Clément Chion. 2023. "Correction: Lagrois et al. Low-to-Mid-Frequency Monopole Source Levels of Underwater Noise from Small Recreational Vessels in the St. Lawrence Estuary Beluga Critical Habitat. Sensors 2023, 23, 1674" Sensors 23, no. 22: 9143. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23229143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop