Natural Intelligence as the Brain of Intelligent Systems
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The reviewer's comments are as follows:
- As a review paper, the abstract is hard to follow. There is too much technical jargon and other abbreviations.
- General block diagrams are easy to understand, but one or two could be more attractive to read. Fig 6 off-centre
- There is broad coverage of related technologies, but I suggest having a summary in the first section to guide the reader on various technologies and with a diagram showing the association between each sub-sections.
- An example of the general term could be given, such as the perceptor and controller, which are extensively used but very general terms.
- As a review summary, is there a trend that the CDS field is evolving? And can it be justified/illustrated by key performance metrics?
Author Response
We submit the respected reviewer response as the attached file.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Reviewer #1: Comment 1: Authors work on cds and results of simulation implementation should be given in numerical form in the abstract and conclusion.
Comment 2: The work is having novel implementation review of natural intelligence algorithm scope and used method should be compared and implemented suitably.
Comment 4: The paper can be drafted in journal format and recent references must be cited.
Comment 5: Improve the quality of figures and explain those properly.
Comment 6: There are many English and grammatical issues in the paper which needs to be rectified.
Author Response
We submit the respected reviewer response as the attached file.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Thank you for the revised manuscript, reviewer has no more comments.
