Next Article in Journal
Three Level Recognition Based on the Average of the Phase Differences in Physical Wireless Parameter Conversion Sensor Networks and Its Effect to Localization with RSSI
Previous Article in Journal
AoI-Aware Optimization of Service Caching-Assisted Offloading and Resource Allocation in Edge Cellular Networks
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 6
10.3390/s23063307
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Analysis of the Development Status and Prospect of China’s Agricultural Sensor Market under Smart Agriculture

by
Ning Sun
1,
Beibei Fan
2,
Yahui Ding
2,
Yuanjinsheng Liu
3,
Yuyun Bi
1,
Patience Afi Seglah
1 and
Chunyu Gao
1,*
1
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
2
National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology Research in Agricultural, Beijing 100097, China
3
School of Science, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2023, 23(6), 3307; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063307
Submission received: 9 February 2023 / Revised: 20 March 2023 / Accepted: 20 March 2023 / Published: 21 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Smart Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Agricultural sensors are essential technologies for smart agriculture, which can transform non-electrical physical quantities such as environmental factors. The ecological elements inside and outside of plants and animals are converted into electrical signals for control system recognition, providing a basis for decision-making in smart agriculture. With the rapid development of smart agriculture in China, agricultural sensors have ushered in opportunities and challenges. Based on a literature review and data statistics, this paper analyzes the market prospects and market scale of agricultural sensors in China from four perspectives: field farming, facility farming, livestock and poultry farming and aquaculture. The study further predicts the demand for agricultural sensors in 2025 and 2035. The results reveal that China’s sensor market has a good development prospect. However, the paper garnered the key challenges of China’s agricultural sensor industry, including a weak technical foundation, poor enterprise research capacity, high importation of sensors and a lack of financial support. Given this, the agricultural sensor market should be comprehensively distributed in terms of policy, funding, expertise and innovative technology. In addition, this paper highlighted integrating the future development direction of China’s agricultural sensor technology with new technologies and China’s agricultural development needs.

1. Introduction

The emergence of smart agriculture (SA) correlates with the rapid development of information technology in the 21st century. SA is a new mode of agricultural production that emphasizes information and knowledge as its fundamental components. Incorporating technologies such as the Internet, the Internet of Things (IoT), big data, cloud computing and artificial intelligence into agriculture allows for the collection and analysis of agricultural information and they aid in decision-making based on quantitative data. Given this, SA has major significance for developing the agricultural sector [1].
As an important front component of SA, agricultural sensors convert non-electrical physical quantities (internal and external factors) related to animals and plants into electrical signals recognized by control systems. Sensors are used to collect data regarding physical and environmental attributes, whereas actuators are used to respond to feedback and gain control over conditions. The sensors’ accumulated data about the object or environment can be used to identify people, locations, objects and their states, which is a guiding principle for scientific research [2]. Agricultural sensors are the foundation of agricultural IoT technology and SA [3]. They are also the basis for the digitalization of the agricultural industry [4]. In this regard, developing and utilizing agricultural sensors is vital for developing SA and establishing agricultural and rural big data systems [5]. The sensors can effectively reduce labor costs and increase the survivability and productivity of plants and animals. Similarly, they enhance labor productivity, improve resource utilization and land productivity and overcome environmental and resource constraints on agricultural development [6].
According to the detection objects, agricultural sensors can be classified into environmental, animal, plant, agricultural product and agricultural machinery sensors. By employing the IoT and big data, agricultural sensors can lessen the ecological difficulties associated with traditional agriculture in open-field crop cultivation, enclosed crop cultivation, animal husbandry and aquaculture production.
According to publicly available data, the global market for agricultural sensors was valued at USD 1.23 billion in 2018 and is expected to reach USD 2.56 billion in 2026, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.04%. In 2025, the adoption rates of digital technology in China’s open-field crop cultivation, enclosed crop cultivation, animal husbandry and aquaculture industries will reach 25%, 45%, 50% and 30% [4]. Furthermore, in 2035, the adoption rates of digital technology in China’s open-field crop cultivation, enclosed crop cultivation, animal husbandry and aquaculture industries will reach 50%, 70%, 75% and 75% [6]. As a traditional agricultural country, China is transitioning to smart agriculture. There is a considerable demand for agricultural sensors, which are essential for SA. The development of China’s agricultural sensor industry, on the other hand, is confronted with opportunities and challenges.
The United States, Japan and Germany hold the largest market share in the global sensor market distribution, whilst other countries, including China, lag behind with a significant gap in market share [7]. For instance, developed countries, including those in Europe, the United States and Japan, monopolize airborne-to-earth observation core sensor technology. In addition, countries such as the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, France and Germany have made sensor technology one of their national priorities for developing critical technologies. This has contributed to the rapid development of sensor technology [8]. At present, China’s agricultural sensor field is facing many problems such as a lack of enterprise technology innovation capability and key technologies, international competitiveness and unsound industrial ecology [9]. Almost 100% of the medium- and high-quality sensing components and 90% of the sensor chips used in China are imported [10]. Due to a lack of high-quality optical components, high-end sensor chips and other principal technologies and processes, the development of airborne spectral imaging sensors is still in its infancy in China [11]. The research and development of multispectral camera sensors in China are only in the scientific research stage. In this regard, users of agricultural UAV sensors can only use expensive imported multispectral sensors. Similarly, wearable plant water sensors [12], electronic noses for monitoring volatile organic compounds released from plant leaves [13,14], miniature biosensors for detecting pH changes in plant foliar tissues [15], nanosensors for detecting crop stress signaling molecules [16] and other plant and animal life ontology information sensors have a long way to go before they can be widely adopted in China. Chinese agricultural sensors, particularly intelligent agricultural sensors, are heavily dependent on imports. Meanwhile, the production and application of self-produced agricultural sensor core components are insufficient to meet the rapid development of the agricultural IoT and SA [17]. This has become a bottleneck that restricts the growth of SA in China.
Through a comprehensive literature review and data statistics, this paper analyses the current situation and prospects of the development of agricultural sensors in China. Likewise, the present study points out the problems and future development directions of China’s agricultural sensor industry in an attempt to serve as a reference for developing agricultural sensors and smart agriculture in China.

2. State-of-the-Art and Related Work

According to the agricultural sensor market research report, the global agricultural sensor market will reach CNY 37.793 billion in 2021. The report predicts that by 2027 the global agricultural sensor market will reach CNY 111.453 billion at a compound annual growth rate of 19.75% during the forecast period. Agricultural sensors have expanded into a vast sector with a wide range of applications in response to the different characteristics of agricultural production. In general, agricultural sensors can be divided into two main categories depending on the object of detection—namely, environmental information sensors and life information sensors [18,19,20]. A more in-depth division of agricultural sensors includes agricultural–environmental information sensors, plant and animal life information sensors, agricultural product quality and safety information sensors, agricultural machinery working condition sensors and operation sensors. In SA production and applications, agricultural sensors can be subdivided into four categories: soil sensors [21], water sensors [22], meteorological sensors [23] and sensors integrated into livestock breeding environments [24].
The soil sensors detect temperature, humidity, pH values, chemical fertilizer concentrations and pesticide concentrations [25]. Soil sensors play a critical role in SA by monitoring real-time physical and chemical signals in the soil. They optimize crop growth circumstances, fight against biotic and abiotic stresses and enhance crop yields. At present, there are many advanced soil sensors in the Chinese market. In recent years, agricultural sensors developed based on microelectronic system (MEMS) technology have been popularized and applied in agricultural science and technology due to their economic, accurate and sensitive characteristics. Using advanced sensors and information technology has become a method to improve the productivity and quality of modern agriculture [26]. The soil sensor market is huge. Among it, the global market for soil moisture sensors was estimated at USD 147.5 million in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 360.9 million by 2027 [27].
Regarding water sensors, the parameters are dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH values, salinity, conductivity and ammonia concentrations. In the future, developing low-cost water sensors with minimum power consumption, strong practicability, comprehensive network coverage and adequate data visualization is the main direction for developing water sensors [28]. The use of meteorological sensors has been well-established. In addition to traditional parameters such as light intensity, temperature, humidity, carbon dioxide concentration and soil moisture content [29], parameters such as aerosol accumulation and carbon loss have been detected by meteorological sensors [30]. With the application of wireless sensor networks [31], the intelligent calibration method [32] and multi-thread serial communication technology [33] on sensors, agrometeorological sensors are now more accurate and cheaper. At last, temperature, humidity, ammonia concentrations, hydrogen sulfide concentrations, carbon dioxide concentrations, sulfur dioxide concentrations and light intensity are the main parameters detected by environmental sensors integrated into breeding environments for poultry and livestock [34]. Environmental sensors should ideally be affordable, lightweight, modular and portable [35]. Currently, more wearable sensor technologies such as motion sensors and vital signs sensors are used within the breeding environment to collect, transmit and store information [36].
In addition, more sensors are used to monitor crops and animals’ growth and life information in real time. Some of these sensors are used to realize the autonomous navigation of agricultural machinery, support scientific decision-making and help agricultural production. Smart optical sensors (automated and high-precision) for detecting the chlorophyll content of a leaf [37], the moisture content of a leaf [38] and water transport in plants [39] have been developed. Animal sensors mainly monitor animals’ growth and physiological parameters (body temperature, behavior, respiratory rates and blood pressure). Animal sensors based on wireless communication modules, infrared light and radio frequency identification have been adopted to identify sheep, dairy cows and sows’ physiological states (diseased, estrous, grazing and feeding) [40,41]. The laser sensor is a new sensor that can detect target shape characteristics without making contact, perform autonomous agricultural machinery avoidance activities, increase irrigation water use efficiency and increase land flatness [42]. The vision sensor simulates human vision to extract usable information from the acquired image, interpret and comprehend it and then utilize it to control agricultural machinery or equipment. Computer and pattern recognition technology is used in this process [8,43].

3. Materials and Methods

According to the classification method widely used in China, this study divided China’s agricultural sensor market into four categories: open-field farming sensors (environmental information sensing sensors and farm machinery sensors), facility farming sensors (environmental information sensing sensors and plant life information sensors), livestock and poultry farming sensors (pig life sensors only) and aquaculture sensors (freshwater farming).
A literature search was carried out by searching the “China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI)”, “Web of Science”, “Springer Link” and “Science Direct” with the keywords of “smart agriculture”, “agricultural sensors”, “agricultural sensor market”, “agricultural sensor industry”, “development prospects”, “existing problems” and “China”. The selection of articles was made based on the keywords mentioned above and included the following criteria: (1) articles related to agricultural sensors and sensor technology, (2) data and forecast on the application of agricultural sensors in China and (3) analysis of the prospect of China’s agricultural sensor market and existing problems. The search results were limited to publications in English and Chinese, and priority was given to articles published during 2015–2022. In addition, this paper also searched government documents and official websites about agricultural sensors in China and consulted documents related to SA and agricultural sensors (Table 1).

4. Results

This section analyzes agricultural sensors’ development status and prospects in China, from field planting to facility planting, livestock and poultry breeding and aquaculture.

4.1. The Demand from the Open-Field Crop Cultivation Industry for Agricultural Sensors

According to data from a survey conducted in 2020 involving 613 farmers in China, there is a strong demand for soil and agricultural machinery sensors for the operations of the open-field crop cultivation industry. Currently, the main types of sensors applied in open-field crop cultivation are environmental and agricultural machinery sensors. The environmental sensors include soil sensors, meteorological sensors and water sensors. On the other hand, agricultural machinery sensors include fuel consumption, speed, GPS, angle and attitude sensors. However, according to the 2020 National County Digital Agriculture and Rural Development Level Evaluation Report, the adoption rate of information technology in China’s open-field crop cultivation industry in 2019 was 17.4%, indicating that environmental and agricultural machinery sensors are not widely applied.
For environmental monitoring, a small soil moisture monitoring station integrated with an air temperature sensor, an air humidity sensor, a soil temperature sensor, a soil moisture sensor and a soil pH sensor can cover up to 10 mu of land. According to the “red line” policy, the total arable land in China should be no less than 1.8 billion mu (120 million hectares (ha)). Therefore, the potential demand from the open-field crop cultivation industry for environmental sensors is as high as 900 million units, corresponding to a market size of CNY 450 billion. It is estimated that the adoption rates of digital technology in China’s open-field crop cultivation industry will exceed 25% and 50% in 2025 and 2035. The demand from the open-field crop cultivation industry for environmental sensors is expected to reach 225 million units at the end of 2025 and 450 million units in 2035.
In China’s agricultural industry, tillage, seeding, pipe installation and harvesting machines have sensors to monitor their operation. The machines include precision rice seeders, no-tillage precision seeders, precision plant protection machines and precision corn harvesters [19,44]. According to the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China (PRC), from January 2020 to June 2020, the total automated agricultural machinery sales generated by major agricultural machinery manufacturers, including China Yituo Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., Revo Heavy Industry Co., Ltd. and Zoomlion Heavy Industry Co., Ltd., exceeded 11,700 units, corresponding to annual growth of 213%. In addition, the China Statistical Yearbook 2021 highlighted that, in 2020, the total number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China was 4.47 million. In 2018, the total market volume of large- and medium-sized tractors in China decreased significantly. Notwithstanding, the production and sales of Chinese tractor enterprises continued to decline due to numerous factors. These factors included large social ownership, the extension of the investment return period, reduced planting income, increased user demand power and other factors that restrained market demand. Due to the influence of policies (such as subsidies, emission limits and land consolidation) on the ownership of large- and medium-sized tractors in China, no mathematical equation can reliably predict the development accurately [45]. Therefore, a generalized linear model, an index model and a first-order autoregressive model were used to predict the number of large- and medium-sized tractors and the demand for agricultural machinery sensors in China in 2025 and 2035. The results are shown in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 and Figure 1.
As shown in Table 3, all of the parameter estimates obtained by using the three regression models are significant (p-values < 0.001), but the coefficient of determination (R2 value) of the first-order autoregressive model is higher than the R2 values of the generalized linear model and index model.
As shown in Table 4, the average relative error of values predicted by the first-order autoregressive model is lower than the average relative error of values predicted by the generalized linear and index models. Therefore, the first-order autoregressive model predicts the number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China more accurately than the generalized linear and index models. The equation for the first-order autoregressive model is as follows:
y t + 1 = 0.8948 y t + 569139
where y t + 1 represents the number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China in the year (t + 1) and y t represents the number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China in year t.
Based on the changes in the number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China from 2001 to 2020 (Table 2), it is expected that the number of large- and medium-sized tractors in China will reach 4.71 million and 4.98 million in 2025 and 2035. An automated wheat harvester requires a set of position, vision and measurement sensors. In total, at least 30 sensors are required in an automated wheat-harvesting process to configure the data collection process and synchronize the collected data. Accordingly, as shown in Table 5, the demand from the open-field crop cultivation industry for agricultural machinery sensors will exceed 35.23 million units and 74.70 million units in 2025 and 2035, respectively. The potential market size for agricultural machinery sensors will be CNY 66.4 billion.

4.2. The Demand from the Enclosed Crop Cultivation Industry for Agricultural Sensors

Enclosed crop cultivation, also known as “facility agriculture”, refers to agricultural production that adopts enclosing facilities such as plastic greenhouses (made of glass or polycarbonate boards), solar greenhouses and awnings. It is commonly used to cultivate vegetables, fruits and flowers. Currently, the primary sensors applied in enclosed crop cultivation include environmental and plant sensors. The environmental sensors comprise temperature, humidity, soil moisture and carbon dioxide sensors. On the other hand, plant sensors constitute sensors for monitoring plant growth, nutrients, hormones, diseases and pests [46]. These seven integrated sensors are air temperature sensors, humidity sensors, light intensity sensors, soil moisture sensors, soil pH sensors, soil nutrient sensors and carbon dioxide sensors.
In 2018, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (MARA) and the Ministry of Natural Resources of PRC launched a nationwide campaign to clean up illegal “greenhouses” and facilities that occupy farmland to accelerate the development of enclosed crop cultivation. In 2020, the General Office of the State Council of PRC issued a notice on ”Resolutely Preventing the Conversion of Cultivated Land into Agricultural Land” and ”Notice and Opinions on Preventing the Conversion of Cultivated Land into Grain” to consolidate the results of the rectification of the illegal “greenhouses” and facilities. The notice also strengthened the supervision of lands used for agricultural facilities. In this regard, since 2019, the total area occupied by enclosed crop cultivation facilities has decreased. According to the China Statistical Yearbook 2020, at the end of 2019, the total area occupied by enclosed crop cultivation facilities was 3.04 million hectares (Figure 2).
In comparison, the total area occupied by the facilities at the end of 2018 was 3.47 million hectares. According to the opinions of MARA on accelerating the development of facility planting mechanization, released in 2020, in China, the total area occupied by enclosed crop cultivation facilities (plastic greenhouses, solar greenhouses and connected greenhouses) will exceed 2 million hectares in 2025. Although the total area occupied by enclosed crop cultivation facilities has decreased in China since 2018, the adoption rate of digital technology in the country’s enclosed crop cultivation industry has increased. The adoption of digital technology in China’s enclosed crop cultivation industry is expected to increase from 45% in 2025 to 70% by 2035 [6]. Based on the requirement of a smart greenhouse occupying one mu of land for eight environmental sensors, the demand from the enclosed crop cultivation industry for environmental sensors will reach 108 million units in 2025 and increase to 168 million units in 2035 (Table 6). The eight environmental sensors mentioned above are air temperature sensors, humidity sensors, light intensity sensors, soil moisture sensors, soil pH sensors, soil nutrient sensors and carbon dioxide sensors. About 54 million and 84 million plant sensors will be needed to meet industry demand by 2025 and 2035, respectively. For context, the environmental sensors market is estimated to be worth CNY 54 billion, while the plant sensors industry is estimated to be worth CNY 27 billion.

4.3. The Demand from the Animal Husbandry Industry for Agricultural Sensors

The animal husbandry industry in China is developing from a traditional industry into an intelligent, digitalized and centralized industry. Environmental and animal sensors are the two most prevalent sensors utilized in the animal husbandry sector. Installing agricultural sensors in livestock sheds, poultry houses and animal bodies is essential to the intelligent animal husbandry industry. They allow for the automated monitoring and control of farming environments and the collecting, storing and analyzing of data related to farming processes. The 526 animal husbandry enterprises surveyed in 2020 revealed that 54.55% had automated monitoring of breeding environments. The monitored parameters were traditional environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, light intensity and ventilation. Considering the 2020 National County Digital Agriculture and Rural Development Level Evaluation Report, in 2019, the adoption rate of digital technology in livestock and poultry breeding in China was 41%. In this regard, the adoption rates of digital technology in China’s animal husbandry industry are anticipated to reach 50% in 2025 and 75% in 2035 [6]. This signifies that China’s animal husbandry industry has fast forwarded to informatization and digitalization, increasing the demand for sensors used to monitor breeding environments for poultry and livestock.
In the swine-breeding industry, a hog house is usually equipped with at least five environmental monitoring sensors, including an air temperature sensor, an air humidity sensor, a carbon dioxide sensor, an ammonia sensor and a light intensity sensor. The China Agricultural Outlook (2020–2029), released by MARA, alludes that in the next 10 years China’s pork output will grow at an average annual rate of 1.9%. Moreover, the supply and demand for live hogs will approach equilibrium in 2035. The number of slaughter hogs is expected to reach 347 million in 2025 and will stabilize at 374 million in 2035. Based on the assumption that 20 hogs occupy one hog house, the potential size of the market for environmental sensors used in the swine-breeding industry is CNY 41.2 billion. The demand from the industry for environmental sensors will reach 43.37 million units in 2025 and 70.12 million units in 2035. In addition to environmental sensors, animal sensors are crucial in monitoring breeding sows. Therefore, breeding sows are usually equipped with wearable vital-sign monitoring equipment consisting of four sensors: a respiratory rate sensor, a body temperature sensor, a pulse rate sensor and a blood pressure sensor [47]. China had 41.61 million breeding sows as of the end of December 2020. Projections from the Opinions on Promoting the Sustainable and Healthy Development of the Pig Industry, which were issued by MARA, the National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) of the PRC and six other departments, state that the number of breeding sows in China will stabilize at 43 million by the end of 2025. The demand from the swine-breeding industry for animal sensors (including individual identification sensors, animal behavior sensors, animal physiology sensors and animal disease sensors) is predicted to reach 86 million units in 2025 and 129 million units in 2035 (Table 7). Similarly, the potential market size for the sensors is CNY 86 billion (Table 7).

4.4. The Demand from the Aquaculture Industry for Agricultural Sensors

China’s aquaculture industry is one of the fastest developing in the country’s agricultural sector. In China, aquatic products come mainly from the country’s aquaculture industry. According to the China Fishery Statistical Yearbook 2020, China’s national aquaculture output in 2019 was 51 million tons, corresponding to year-on-year growth of 1.76%. On the other hand, the total area designated for aquaculture production was 7 million ha, corresponding to a yearly decrease of 1.13%. In 2016, MARA issued working specifications for the preparation of an outline of the flat tidal planning in aquaculture waters. The documents put forward zoning and classification guidelines and supporting policies related to the distribution of aquaculture production. In addition, in 2018, it was proposed that adjustments to China’s aquaculture industry should focus on “improving quality and reducing quantity” and “improving the ecological aspects of aquaculture” [48]. China’s aquaculture industry needs industrial restructuring and intelligent transformation due to the slow growth of output of aquatic products and the area designated for aquaculture production. At present, the adoption rate of digital technology in China’s aquaculture industry is low because most enterprises and farmers still adopt traditional aquaculture production. The 2020 National County Digital Agriculture and Rural Development Level stipulates that, in 2019, the adoption rate of digital technology in China’s aquaculture industry was 16.4%. However, this value was lower than the adoption rates of technology in the country’s animal husbandry, open-field crop cultivation and enclosed crop cultivation industries. Only a small fraction (>1%) of China’s counties (cities and districts) adopted digital technology in their aquaculture farms. Thus, China’s agriculture sector is still in the early stages of its intelligent transformation. There is growing consensus that intelligent transformation is key to developing the modern aquaculture industry. Sensing technology and the IoT enable innovative transformation through comprehensively monitoring and controlling water quality and the growth of cultivated species in aquaculture production environments. The technologies will continuously improve the productivity and profitability of the aquaculture industry [49]. Therefore, there is a great demand from the aquaculture industry for agricultural sensors.
Currently, in the aquaculture industry, sensors are mainly used to monitor the pH and temperature of the water and the dissolved oxygen and ammonia concentrations in water. Based on the standard coverage of the sensors, a pH sensor, a dissolved oxygen sensor and a temperature sensor are required to cover an area of 10 mu. At present, galvanic dissolved oxygen sensors are most commonly (50%) used in the aquaculture industry, followed by polarographic (40%) and optical (10%) dissolved oxygen sensors [50]. The average maintenance periods of the galvanic, polarographic and optical dissolved oxygen sensors are three months, six months and twelve months, respectively. In contrast, composite glass electrode pH sensors are the pH sensors most commonly (70%) used in the aquaculture industry, followed by differential (28%) and optical (2%) pH sensors. The average maintenance periods of the composite glass electrode, differential and optical pH sensors are one month, three months and six months, respectively [50]. The aquaculture industry generally has a high demand for the three types of dissolved oxygen and pH sensors. The sensors have average maintenance intervals of less than one year. In terms of the area designated for aquaculture production, due to the continuous promotion of the supply-side reform of national aquaculture and the increasing awareness of environmental protection, the aquaculture production area in China will remain stable. China’s total area used for freshwater aquaculture production in 2019 was 5.12 million hectares. Considering the assumption that the coverage of an area of 10 mu requires the installation of a pH sensor, a dissolved oxygen sensor and a temperature sensor, the demand from China’s freshwater aquaculture industry for agricultural sensors will reach 9.2 million units (in 2025) and 23 million units in 2035 (Table 8). Additionally, the potential market size for the sensors is CNY 15.2 billion (Table 8). The adoption rates of digital technology in China’s aquaculture industry are expected to reach 30% in 2025 and 75% in 2035.

5. Discussions

China’s agricultural sensor industry was established in the 1960s [51]. Supported by the rapid development of remote sensing technology, the industry gradually developed. At the end of the 1980s, remote sensing data acquisition using multiband sensors on satellites was established in China to monitor and evaluate agricultural production. At the same time, the connected greenhouse structure was introduced, and the scale of enclosed crop cultivation began to expand. Agricultural researchers and practitioners of enclosed crop cultivation began to use sensors in greenhouses and explore the applications of sensors in the agricultural industry. Over the past 40 years, China’s agricultural sensor industry has transformed into a developed industrial system [51]. Environmental sensors such as air temperature, air humidity and soil moisture sensors have been commonly used in agricultural production. Advanced technologies in environmental sensors focus on temperature, light, soil moisture, pH and other indicator measurements. However, there is a lack of sensors for the dynamic monitoring of the ecologically integrated environment of farmland and plant growth information. Research on dynamic sensing and monitoring technologies for harmful pollutants such as heavy metals and pesticide residues in soil, essential environmental factors and kinetic models for plant–soil–environment interactions is still insufficient. There is a lack of methods for highly sensitive, selective, multi-point simultaneous or multi-component high-throughput detection of the above single-component detection objects [18,52]. On the other hand, temperature sensors, ammonia sensors, dissolved oxygen sensors and pH sensors have been used in aquaculture production. Moreover, multifunctional sensors integrating different types of sensors have been developed. Entering China’s “14th Five-Year Plan” period, the agricultural sensor industry is provided with a significant opportunity for development due to the great demand for agricultural sensors. Despite the vital opportunity, China lags behind technologically advanced countries in research on agricultural sensors and market share in the global market for agricultural sensors. Therefore, comprehensive improvements are required.
In China, research on agricultural sensors is still in its early stage. China produces less than 10% of the world’s agricultural sensors due to a dearth of investment and qualified research and development personnel [53]. Most of the agricultural sensors produced in China are modified industrial sensors. Therefore, agricultural sensors lack accuracy, stability and stress resistance. Moreover, neither animal nor plant sensors are produced in China, meaning core algorithms for big data mining process data collected by high-tech agricultural sensors are lacking [54]. Autonomous, controllable, intelligent, high-tech, agricultural sensors have not been produced in China. Most high-tech agricultural sensors developed in China are still in the laboratory testing stage. Significant differences exist in the stability, reliability and power consumption between domestically produced and imported agricultural sensors [55]. Additionally, the industrial development mechanism of China’s agricultural sensor technology needs to be improved. Problems with the industrial structure of agricultural sensors include fragmentation of enterprises, weakness, low technology level, the existence of a large number of similar products and a lack of innovation. Few companies in China can independently develop and improve sensors, while the majority of sensor companies duplicate or assemble similar products from overseas. As a result, the core technology accumulation of these enterprises is insufficient and far behind the developed countries. For example, the cost of developing mainstream sensor chips based on MEMS technology is high. Even a large-scale professional, scientific research team needs at least ten years of technical accumulation to succeed in research. Small sensor enterprises find it challenging to devote time and financial resources to developing new technology.
However, the United States, Germany, Japan and other countries are leading in agricultural sensors. These countries have a monopoly on sensing components, high-end agricultural environmental sensors, plant and animal life information sensors and online inspection equipment for the quality of agricultural products and other related technology products. The United States is one of the pioneers in using agricultural sensors in the agriculture sector. Not only does agricultural sensor technology in the United States feature a sophisticated measurement system, but the obtained data are also diverse and accurate. Different types of agricultural sensors have the characteristics of high integration. Therefore, the stability of information transmission between agricultural sensors is relatively strong. In addition, the United States invests more money in researching new technologies and new products of agricultural sensors every year. For example, the United States is developing laser-induced spectroscopy technology for measuring soil nutrients and heavy metal content and is using micro- and nanotechnology to develop sensors that can enter the metabolic cycle system of plant and animal life forms [54]. China’s proportion of the global market for agricultural sensors is considerably less than that of the United States, Japan and Germany. Agricultural sensors produced in China are manufactured on a small scale with low-level technology. Therefore, the profitability of the sensors is low because of the lack of economies of scale. As a result, approximately 90% of imported high-tech agricultural sensors dominate the Chinese market for agricultural sensors [10].
To summarize, smart agriculture has become an essential way for developed countries to increase the export value of agricultural products. As the technical support for smart agriculture is missing, the industrialization level of agricultural sensors in China lags far behind that of developed countries, mainly including the following aspects. (a) Large differences in sensor accuracy, low-cost performance, high product failure rate and low informatization level. (b) A lack of sensor communication technology, such as wireless sensor network communication, heavily affects accuracy, reliability and coverage. (c) The measurement type is singular, and the multi-parameter and multi-field integrated sensor needs to be developed urgently. (d) A lack of sensor intelligent calibration technology and application in error analysis, modeling and processing. (e) A lack of comprehensive and reliable monitoring technology, including electromagnetic compatibility technology and comprehensive monitoring of environmental reliability and safety regulations. (f) Diversity is absent in the types of agricultural planting and breeding sensors. Additionally, the application of biological agriculture planting and breeding sensors based on nano- and microsystem technology must be urgently developed. (g) Sensor materials and processes, such as nanoscale materials and MEMS sensor technologies, lack technological accumulation. China will need to make significant advancements in agricultural sensor technology. First, future optical, electrochemical, electromagnetic, ultrasonic, image and other methods based on new mechanisms of agricultural sensing, as well as sensitive devices, photoelectric conversion, weak signal processing and other core components, will become the critical research directions of China’s agricultural sensors. Then, new agricultural sensors with micro and small sizes, high reliability, low power consumption, low cost and long lifetime under complex agricultural environments will also be the cardinal directions of sensor technology development in China. According to the analysis of the products exhibited in the International Industrial Exhibition and the technological development of the internationally renowned manufacturers, the development trends of sensor technology are diverse. These encompass digital compensation, networking, intelligent and multi-function composite technologies. China should adapt its policies, finances, human resources and other resources and technology to the agricultural sensor market to accomplish its goals. By doing so, China can hope to achieve its primary strategy of breaking other countries’ monopoly on technical products by developing a batch of agricultural sensors with high precision, low cost and increased stability.

6. Conclusions

Since agriculture is the backbone of any country, ensuring its sustainable growth over the years is necessary. The development of SA and sensor technology provides opportunities for the sustainable development of agriculture. Based on our literature review, data statistics and the development trend of China’s agriculture, this work predicts the market potential of China’s agricultural sensors, highlighting that China’s sensor technology and enterprise R&D strength cannot meet the needs of China’s sensor industry. The sensors produced in China have the limitations of single measurement type, poor accuracy, high failure rate and a lack of sensor communication technology support. Similarly, sensor enterprises lack technology accumulation in materials and technology and cannot break through technical barriers.
The current study posits solutions for addressing the abovementioned problems. First, China’s government must prioritize agricultural sensors as a principal technology for rural revitalization and development and design top-notch industrial systems. Second, enterprises must establish a sensor industry chain conducive to technology accumulation, research and innovation. Third, regarding technological breakthroughs, future optical, electrochemical, electromagnetic, ultrasonic, image and other methods based on new mechanisms of agricultural sensing, MEMS sensors, digital compensation, networking, intelligent and multi-function composite technologies, as well as sensitive devices, photoelectric conversion, weak signal processing and other core components, will become the critical research directions of China’s agricultural sensors. In addition, this paper also proposes that agricultural sensors will gradually develop towards low cost, high stability and high intelligence outcomes, as well as portability and ease of operation. Future technical improvements are expected to address the limitations of agricultural sensors.

Author Contributions

Materials and methods, Y.B. and C.G.; data curation, Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.S. and B.F.; writing—review and editing, N.S., Y.D. and P.A.S.; supervision, Y.B.; project administration, C.G.; funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 41771569, supported this work.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Statistics Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, and all of the staff at the district, regional and national levels who compiled the data for this research. The authors express their profound gratitude and thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions and comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhao, C. State-of-the-art and recommended developmental strategic objective of smart agriculture. Smart Agric. 2019, 1, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Aqeel-ur-Rehman; Abu, Z.; Noman, I. A review of wireless sensors and networks’ applications in agriculture. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2014, 36, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, J.; Guo, M.; Gao, L. Application and innovation strategy of agricultural Internet of Things. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2015, 31, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Johnson, N.; Kumar, M.; Dhannia, T. A study on the significance of smart IoT sensors and Data science in Digital agriculture. In Proceedings of the Advanced Computing and Communication Technologies for High Performance Applications (ACCTHPA), Cochin, India, 2 July 2020. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yan, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y. The Application, Problems and Development of China’s Agricultural Smart Sensors. J. Agric. Big Data 2021, 2, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhao, C.; Li, J.; Feng, X. Development Strategy of Smart Agriculture for 2035 in China. Strateg. Study Chin. Acad. Eng. 2021, 23, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Z. The Agricultural Industrial Management Mode and Development Counter Measures. Master’s Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, P.; Huang, J.; Xie, Q. Application of sensors in precision agriculture. Guangdong Agric. Sci. 2014, 41, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Intelligent Sensor Spectrum System and Development Strategy White Paper. Available online: http://www.cesi.cn/201908/5426.html (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  10. Zhang, B.; Zha, Y.; Shi, Y. The status, potential risks and countermeasure proposals of import-dependent on intelligent agricultural equipment. China Agric. Inform. 2019, 31, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Z. Research Progress on Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Ecological Remote Sensing Monitoring Based on Bibliometric Assessment. Trop. Geogr. 2019, 4, 616–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lan, L. In-Situ and Non-Destructive Sensing of Plant Water Information Based on Self-Powered Flexible and Wearable Devices. Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  13. Xiao, W.; Tang, X.; Ren, Z. Rapid diagnosis ofpesticide residues in fresh tea leaves based on electronic nose technology. J. Tea Commun. 2021, 3, 484–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, L.; Yi, Y.; Peng, Y. Analysis of the volatile flavor substances of Chinese prickly ash leaf in different growth stages based on E-nose and gas chromatographymass spectrometry. J. South. Agric. 2019, 3, 641–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, Q. Microbiosensor and Its Application on the Transgenic Plant Physiological Process in Real Time. Master’s Thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, J.; Wu, H.; Tao, Y. Advances in smart agriculture research: Application of nanobiotechnology to obtain crop information. J. Smart Agric. 2021, 11, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  17. Application and Market of Agricultural Sensor Technology in China: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Available online: http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/33.1247.S.20220906.1417.004.html (accessed on 25 February 2023).
  18. Chen, W.; Guo, S. Development status and existing problems of China’s agricultural information technology. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2013, 22, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, J.; Wu, J.; Han, S. Research progress and performance analysis of agricultural sensor technology. Agric. Outlook 2017, 1, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, C. Greenhouse Remote Environment Monitoring System Based on IoT. Master’s Thesis, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Almaw, A.; Naveen, K.; Akshaya, A. Soil moisture sensors in agriculture and the possible application of nanomaterials in soil moisture sensors fabrication. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Res. Technol. 2018, 6, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lin, L.; Wang, R.; Yu, P. GIS-based visual monitoring system for farmland microclimate environment. Transations Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2015, 3, 254–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Research status and trends of key technologies for aquaculture informatization. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2015, 7, 251–263. [Google Scholar]
  24. Aunsa-Ard, W.; Pobkrut, T.; Kerdcharoen, T. Development of Intelligent Electronic Nose for Livestock Industries. In Proceedings of the 2021 7th International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences and Technology (ICEAST), Pattaya, Thailand, 1–3 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  25. Gao, K. Research and Implementation of Soil Multi-Parameter Acquisition and Transmission System Based on Internet of Things Technology. Master’s Thesis, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  26. Singh, N.; Singh, A. Odysseys of agriculture sensors: Current challenges and forthcoming prospects. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2020, 171, 10532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yin, H.; Cao, Y.; Benedetto, M. Soil Sensors and Plant Wearables for Smart and Precision Agriculture. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, e2007764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, C.; Chen, M.; Chi, T. Design and application of aquaculture monitoring system based on LoRa wireless communication. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2020, 41, 154–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Srbinovska, M.; Gavrovski, C.; Dimcev, V. Environmental parameters monitoring in precision agriculture using wireless sensor networks. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 88, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lakhiar, I.; Jianmin, G.; Syed, T. Monitoring and control systems in agriculture using intelligent sensor techniques: A review of the aeroponic system. J. Sens. 2018, 2018, 8672769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cui, B.; Dong, W.; Huang, Y. Study and Design of Wireless Meotorological Sensor Network. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 33, 55–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, Y.; Jia, K.; Liu, X. Calibration method of meteorological sensor based on enhanced BP network. J. Instrum. 2020, 15, P10014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yao, L.; Gui, X. Remote Weather Data Acquisition System Based on Multi-thread Serial Communication Technology. Instrum. Tech. Sens. 2008, 307, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sébastien, F.; Alain, N.; Benoit, L. Rethinking environment control strategy of confined animal housing systems through precision livestock farming. Biosyst. Eng. 2017, 155, 96–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, X.; Li, W.; Wang, L. Based on STM 32F103 cowshed environment intelligent control system. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 782, 052040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, L. Research Status and Development Analysis of Wearable Information Monitoring Technology in Animal Husbandry. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yang, B.; Du, R.; Yang, Y. Design and experiment of aportable non-destructive tester for plant leaf chlorophyll content. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2019, 50, 180–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Shi, Z.; Jiang, Y. Design of a portable corn leaf moisture detection instrument. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2016, 38, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chai, Y.; Hen, C.; Luo, X. Cohabiting Plant-Wearable Sensor In Situ Monitors Water Transport in Plant. Adv. Sci. 2021, 8, 2003642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, F. Research on the Grazing Behavior Monitoring System of Grazing Sheep. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pu, X.; Zhu, W.; Lu, C. Sick pig behavior monitoring system based on symmetric pixel block recognition. Comput. Eng. 2009, 35, 250–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Debangshi, U. LiDAR Sensor: Applications in Agriculture. Chron. Bioresour. Manag. 2022, 6, 066–071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Li, M.; Li, X.; Sun, S. Localization system of agricultural machinery based on omni-directional vision sensor. Trans. CSAE 2010, 26, 170–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, C.; Lin, H.; Li, Y. Analysis on Status and Development Trend of Intelligent Control Technology for Agricultural Equipment. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, Z. Prediction of Total Number of Agricultural Tractor Based on Fuzzy Time Series. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2020, 1, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yan, X.; Wang, W.; Liang, J. Application mode construction of internet of things (IOT) for facility agriculture in Beijing. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2012, 28, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Feng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y. Intelligent breeding: The research and application of pig behavior. Res. Agric. Mod. 2021, 42, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cao, J. Current situation and countermeasures of aquaculture pollution. Soc. Sci. 2018, 2, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, Q. Application and development of Internet of things in aquaculture. Rural Econ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 32, 58–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, S.; Li, G.; Tu, X. Research on the development of aquaculture production information technology. Fish. Mod. 2021, 48, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Peng, H.; Ni, J.; Chen, K. Research on development trend of agricultural sensors. Jiangsu Agric. Mech. 2021, 4, 25–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mancuso, M.; Bustaffa, F. A wireless sensors network for monitoring environmental variables in a tomato greenhouse. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems, Torino, Italy, 1 January 2006. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang, Y.; Gu, L.; Wang, Q. Exploration and practice of the new model of agricultural information Service in the era of mobile Internet. In Proceedings of the Second National Academic Exchange on Precision Agriculture and Agricultural Spatial Information Technology and Promotion of Agricultural Informatization and Intelligent Scientific and Technological Achievements, Yangling, China, 24 May 2013. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, C. Current situations and prospects of smart agriculture. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2021, 42, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Li, D. Internet of Things and Wisdom Agriculture. Agric. Eng. 2012, 2, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
Sensors 23 03307 g001 550
Figure 1. Fitting value and predictive value of ownership of large- and medium-sized tractors in China.
Figure 1. Fitting value and predictive value of ownership of large- and medium-sized tractors in China.
Sensors 23 03307 g001
Sensors 23 03307 g002 550
Figure 2. Changes in planting areas of facility agriculture in China from 2013 to 2019. Data source: China County Statistical Yearbook, National Bureau of Statistics.
Figure 2. Changes in planting areas of facility agriculture in China from 2013 to 2019. Data source: China County Statistical Yearbook, National Bureau of Statistics.
Sensors 23 03307 g002
Table
Table 1. Government documents consulted.
Table 1. Government documents consulted.
Subject Chinese National Government EntityDocuments Consulted
Smart
Agriculture		Informatization Development Bureau of office of the Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission, Department of Market and Information Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, Chinese Bureau of Statistics“No.1 Central Document” released by
China in 2021, China Digital Rural Development Report (2020), statistical yearbook (2020)
Smart
Agriculture		National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology Research in AgricultureResearch on Smart Agriculture Development Strategy for 2035
Agricultural SensorsAnimal Husbandry and Veterinary Bureau, Development Planning Division, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of the People’s Republic of ChinaSummary of the Response Proposal No. 02409 (No. 195 for Agricultural and Water Conservancy) of the Fifth Session of the 13th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference (CPPCC),
Response of the Ministry of Agriculture on Feasibility Study Report of Five Construction Projects including Precision Agriculture Technology Integrated Scientific Research Base (Fishery)
Table
Table 2. Ownership of large- and medium-sized tractors in China from 2001 to 2020.
Table 2. Ownership of large- and medium-sized tractors in China from 2001 to 2020.
YearOwnership of Large- and Medium-Sized TractorsYearOwnership of Large- and Medium-Sized Tractors
2001829,90020114,406,471
2002911,67020124,852,400
2003980,56020135,270,200
20041,118,63620145,679,500
20051,395,98120156,072,900
20061,718,24720166,453546
20072,062,73120176,700,800
20082,995,21420184,219,893
20093,515,75720194,438,619
20103,921,72320204,472,700
Data source: China Rural Statistical Yearbook.
Table
Table 3. Test results of three different models.
Table 3. Test results of three different models.
ModelEstimate ValuesStandard Error t Valuesp Values R 2
R Squares
General linear regression model323,600.937,632.798.60<0.0010.8131
Index model237.9 *25.079.49<0.0010.8412
AR(1) autoregressive model0.89480.11707.65<0.0010.8864
* The estimate here is the parameter estimate obtained by logarithmic transformation.
Table
Table 4. Prediction errors of three different models.
Table 4. Prediction errors of three different models.
YearActual Values *General Linear Regression ModelIndex ModelAR(1) Autoregressive Model
Predictive ValuesRelative Error (%)Predictive ValuesRelative Error (%)Predictive ValuesRelative Error (%)
20166,453,5465,379,61616.643,311,69848.686,003,1706.69
20176,700,8005,703,21714.883,726,37144.386,343,7725.32
20184,219,8936,026,81842.814,192,7230.646,565,01455.57
20194,438,6196,350,41943.074,717,1636.274,345,0992.10
Average relative error 29.35% 24.99% 17.42%
* All actual and forecast values are in units of one.
Table
Table 5. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of field planting sensors.
Table 5. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of field planting sensors.
Sensor TypeConfiguration StandardPotential Market Size
(CNY 100 Million)		Market Prospective Forecast
In 2025 In 2035
Environmental information sensing sensor5/6666.7 m24500225 million450 million
Agricultural machinery sensor30/unit66435.23 million74.7 million
Table
Table 6. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of sensors in the facility planting industry.
Table 6. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of sensors in the facility planting industry.
Sensor TypeConfiguration StandardPotential Market Size (CNY 100 Million)Market Prospective Forecast
In 2025In 2035
Environmental information sensing sensor8/666.67 m2540108 million168 million
Plant life information sensor4/666.67 m227054 million84 million
Table
Table 7. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of sensors in the livestock breeding industry (pigs).
Table 7. Potential market scale and prospective forecast of sensors in the livestock breeding industry (pigs).
Sensor TypeConfiguration StandardPotential Market Size
(CNY 100 Million)		Market Prospective Forecast
In 2025 In 2035
Environmental information sensing sensor5/20 pigs41243.37 million70.12 million
Animal life information sensor4/pig86086 million129 million
Table
Table 8. Potential scale and prospective forecast of the aquaculture (freshwater) sensor market.
Table 8. Potential scale and prospective forecast of the aquaculture (freshwater) sensor market.
Sensor TypeConfiguration StandardPotential Market Size (CNY 100 Million)Market Prospective Forecast
In 2025 In 2035
Aquaculture environment sensor4/6666.7 m21529.2 million23 million
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, N.; Fan, B.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bi, Y.; Seglah, P.A.; Gao, C. Analysis of the Development Status and Prospect of China’s Agricultural Sensor Market under Smart Agriculture. Sensors 2023, 23, 3307. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063307

AMA Style

Sun N, Fan B, Ding Y, Liu Y, Bi Y, Seglah PA, Gao C. Analysis of the Development Status and Prospect of China’s Agricultural Sensor Market under Smart Agriculture. Sensors. 2023; 23(6):3307. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063307

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Ning, Beibei Fan, Yahui Ding, Yuanjinsheng Liu, Yuyun Bi, Patience Afi Seglah, and Chunyu Gao. 2023. "Analysis of the Development Status and Prospect of China’s Agricultural Sensor Market under Smart Agriculture" Sensors 23, no. 6: 3307. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063307

APA Style

Sun, N., Fan, B., Ding, Y., Liu, Y., Bi, Y., Seglah, P. A., & Gao, C. (2023). Analysis of the Development Status and Prospect of China’s Agricultural Sensor Market under Smart Agriculture. Sensors, 23(6), 3307. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063307

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop