Next Article in Journal
Gyro-Free Inertial Navigation Systems Based on Linear Opto-Mechanical Accelerometers
Previous Article in Journal
Sensors for Human Physical Behaviour Monitoring
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 23
Issue 8
10.3390/s23084092
Review Report
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on Synchronous Control of Active Disturbance Rejection Position of Multiple Hydraulic Cylinders of Digging-Anchor-Support Robot

Sensors 2023, 23(8), 4092; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084092
by Tianbing Ma 1,2,*, Xiangxiang Guo 1,2, Guoyong Su 1,2, Haishun Deng 2 and Ting Yang 1
Reviewer 1:
Ali Resen
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Hao Feng
Sensors 2023, 23(8), 4092; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23084092
Submission received: 10 March 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 15 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sensors and Robotics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I have gone through your manuscript, and I do not have any critical comments to make. I believe it is well-written and well-organized as it is.

Author Response

It's a pleasure to hear from you. On behalf of all the authors of this article, I would like to thank you for your approval and wish you every success.

Reviewer 2 Report

The modelling section is not complete. There is no plant model. I.e. how do the valve commands, u, relate the to cylinder forces or velocities? The results seem good, but without these equations and parameters it is impossible to evaluate the controller or whether the results are plausible.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper proposed an improved automatic disturbance rejection controller- improved particle swarm optimization position synchronization control method.

To verify the reliability of the ADRC-IPSO control algorithm, authors compared with the traditional auto-disturbance rejection control algorithm and the classical PID control algorithm, in order to reflect the degree of improvement, the performance comparison of traditional particle swarm optimization algorithms should also be added into “4. Simulation analysis” part.

The joint simulation is carried out by using MATLAB and AMESim software, is it a hydraulic cylinder or an integral mechanism? Joint parameters need to be given, specific parameters such as the size of the large and small cavities, the length of the hydraulic cylinder, and the oil supply pressure. Hydraulic AMESim simulation models and parameters also need to be given.

Steady state value is 150.0, why is there no overshoot under PID control and what are the parameters of PID controller?

In the experimental part, in addition to considering the controllers differences from the perspective of control accuracy, control quantities is also an indicator to visually express the reliability.

Experimental platform need to be described in more detail, such as sensor parameters and types.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

The author has made corresponding changes, this work can meet requirements.

Back to TopTop