Next Article in Journal
Ultra-Wideband Vertical Transition in Coplanar Stripline for Ultra-High-Speed Digital Interfaces
Previous Article in Journal
Shear Wave Velocity Determination of a Complex Field Site Using Improved Nondestructive SASW Testing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Real-Time Risk Assessment Detection for Weak People by Parallel Training Logical Execution of a Supervised Learning System Based on an IoT Wearable MEMS Accelerometer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Amphibious Multifunctional Hydrogel Flexible Haptic Sensor with Self-Compensation Mechanism

1
School of Microelectronics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
2
Center of Analysis and Testing Facilities, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
3
Tianjin International Joint Research Center for Internet of Things, Tianjin 300072, China
4
Tianjin Key Laboratory of Imaging and Sensing Microelectronic Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(10), 3232; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103232
Submission received: 7 April 2024 / Revised: 11 May 2024 / Accepted: 16 May 2024 / Published: 19 May 2024

Abstract

:
In recent years, hydrogel-based wearable flexible electronic devices have attracted much attention. However, hydrogel-based sensors are affected by structural fatigue, material aging, and water absorption and swelling, making stability and accuracy a major challenge. In this study, we present a DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogel prepared using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), sodium alginate (SA), ethylene glycol (EG), and ZnSO4 and propose a self-calibration compensation strategy. The strategy utilizes a metal salt solution to adjust the carrier concentration of the hydrogel to mitigate the resistance drift phenomenon to improve the stability and accuracy of hydrogel sensors in amphibious scenarios, such as land and water. The ExpGrow model was used to characterize the trend of the ∆R/R0 dynamic response curves of the hydrogels in the stress tests, and the average deviation of the fitted curves ϵ ¯ was calculated to quantify the stability differences of different groups. The results showed that the stability of the uncompensated group was much lower than that of the compensated group utilizing LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions ( ϵ ¯ in the uncompensated group in air was 276.158, 1.888, 2.971, 30.586, and 13.561 times higher than that of the compensated group in LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3, respectively; ϵ ¯ in the uncompensated group in seawater was 10.287 times, 1.008 times, 1.161 times, 4.986 times, 1.281 times, respectively, higher than that of the compensated group in LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2 and AlCl3). In addition, for the ranking of the compensation effect of different compensation solutions, the concentration of the compensation solution and the ionic radius and charge of the cation were found to be important factors in determining the compensation effect. Detection of events in amphibious environments such as swallowing, robotic arm grasping, Morse code, and finger–wrist bending was also performed in this study. This work provides a viable method for stability and accuracy enhancement of dual-network hydrogel sensors with strain and pressure sensing capabilities and offers solutions for sensor applications in both airborne and underwater amphibious environments.

1. Introduction

As a material with high water content and adjustable mechanical properties, hydrogel has attracted much attention in recent years, especially showing great potential in the field of pressure sensing. Its application in wearable devices is particularly prominent [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Hydrogel-based pressure sensors not only have good flexibility and comfort, but also can realize real-time monitoring of the dynamic pressure of the human body, and thus, they are widely used in medical and health monitoring [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22], smart sports equipment [23,24,25,26,27], and other fields. However, as the application scenarios of hydrogel sensors continue to expand, their stability and accuracy in dynamic environments are challenged due to the fact that gel-based sensors have resistance drift problems due to material degradation and environmental factors [28,29], as well as in underwater environments; hydrogel sensors’ characteristics of absorbing and expanding water [30,31,32] can also affect the accurate monitoring of hydrogel-based sensors. Therefore, further effective solutions are needed to overcome this challenge and enhance the performance of hydrogel sensors used in wearable devices.
To address the background of current operations in performance enhancement of hydrogel sensors, mainly focusing on fabrication processes, material replacement, synthesis methods, optimization of monitoring methods [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44] and other related operations, e.g., Binder et al. [45,46] proposed a force compensation that exploits the additional sensitivity of a doubly sensitive hydrogel by applying force compensation in the opposite stimulation mode, in order to achieve counteracting hydrogel monitoring instability caused by hydrogel swelling. This dual-sensitive hydrogel sensor capable of force compensation was subsequently miniaturized by Binder et al. [47]. In addition, Lee et al. [48] designed a flexible ionogel sensor as a microcone and used a machine learning-based algorithm to assist in monitoring, resulting in a monitoring accuracy of 95.86%. Meanwhile, Wu et al. [49] proposed a way to fabricate a hydrogel sensor suitable for dual sensing of temperature and strain using a salt-permeable strategy, and the sensor exhibited improved mechanical stability, frost resistance, and a wide operating range. Although their approaches improve the performance metrics of hydrogel sensors in different ways, none of them have been able to address the fundamental destabilizing effect on the detection results due to the fact that the polar migration of ions [50,51,52] occurs continuously within the hydrogel and results in resistance drift during monitoring in a conductive working circuit. Thus, this thesis proposes a self-calibration compensation mechanism that provides an idea for the improvement of hydrogel sensor stability and reliability. To address these challenges and improve the performance of hydrogel-based sensors, this study proposes a strategy to introduce compensating ions to mitigate the resistance drift phenomenon. By strategically introducing different ions into the hydrogel matrix, the carrier concentration can be adjusted, and the electrical performance of the sensor can be stabilized. The proposed method of self-calibration compensation is important for improving the stability and reliability of hydrogel-based pressure sensors in air and underwater environments.
In this study, the effectiveness of hydrogels in air and underwater environments is explored, with special attention to the improvement of their stability. And a dual-network hydrogel design combined with a self-calibration compensation strategy is proposed to solve the problem of poor stability of hydrogel-based pressure sensors caused by resistance drift in dynamic environments. Through the characterization and performance evaluation of the system, the effects of the concentration of the compensation solution, the radius of the metal cation in the compensation solution, and the amount of charge carried on the compensation effect of the hydrogel sensor are also analyzed with the aim of demonstrating the importance of our designed hydrogel system and self-calibrated compensation strategy in advancing the field of hydrogel-based pressure sensors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Aladdin provided the sodium alginate (SA), while Shanghai National Pharmaceutical Group supplied the polyvinyl alcohol (PVA1750 ± 50, alcoholysis degree ≥ 99%). Tianjin Fuchen Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China, provided the ZnSO4, and Tianjin Beichen Fangzheng Reagent Factory, Tianjin, China, supplied the ethylene glycol (EG). LiCl was purchased from Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China, and NaCl was purchased from Tianjin Zhonglian Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China. KCl was procured from Tianjin Huasheng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China, MgCl2 from Tianjin Zhiyuan Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China, and AlCl3 from Tianjin Huasheng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., China. Syringes (5 mL capacity, 0.5 × 8 mm needle size) were purchased from Taizhou Ming’an Medical Instrument Co., Ltd., Taizhou, China.

2.2. Preparation of DN-SPEZ Hydrogels

First, 8 mL of deionized water and 0.5 g of ZnSO4 were stirred uniformly at 200 rad/min for 5 min at room temperature (25 °C) to ensure complete mixing. Next, 2 mL of ethylene glycol (EG) was added in the ratio of 4:1 by volume with deionized water and stirred homogeneously at 200 rad/min for 1 min and then left to stand for 15 min to allow the solution to be thoroughly mixed. Then, 0.3 g of sodium alginate (SA) was stirred at 60 °C for 15 min at 1500 rad/min to dissolve SA and induce a cross-linking reaction. Subsequently, 1.2 g of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) was added to the mixed solution at 1500 rad/min and stirred at 60 °C for 30 min to induce the swelling of PVA and further formation of the structure of hydrogel. Finally, the mixed solution was stirred at 800 rad/min for 2 h at 95 °C to ensure that the components were fully mixed and formed a stable hydrogel structure. After completion of the above steps, the solution was frozen under ultra-low-temperature conditions (−18 °C) for 24 h and thawed at room temperature (25 °C) for 4 h to form the final DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogel samples. The fabrication process of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel with the form of internal dual-network cross-linking is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 2 shows the fibrous 3D network structure of the resulting DN-SPEZ hydrogel after lyophilization at a 5 μm scale (magnified 7000 times) and 10 μm scale (magnified 15,000 times). It can be seen that the typical 3D fibrous network structure displayed by DN-SPEZ hydrogels after lyophilization has a thick and rough surface, indicating that the synthesized hydrogels form a stable and physically entangled interpenetrating network structure, which permits the structural stability of the hydrogels as sensors in the event of mechanical deformation [53]. As shown in Figure 2b, the presence of dense pores inside the hydrogel can be observed at the 5 μm scale, which is due to the effect of evaporation of water crystals after lyophilization [54].

2.3. Formation of Hydrogels

First, sodium alginate (SA) itself carried a carboxyl group, which interacted electrostatically in the presence of Zn2+ to form an ionic bond between Zn2+ and the carboxyl group, and this ionic bond aggregated the SA molecule into a three-dimensional network structure by cross-linking [55]. Secondly, the divalent cation Zn2+ provided four empty orbitals through sp3 hybridization [56], while the hydroxyl group carried by polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) provided a lone pair of electrons, which resulted in the formation of a ligand bond between Zn2+ and PVA, and this ligand bond cross-linking led to the formation of a three-dimensional spatial mesh structure of PVA. At the same time, a large number of water molecules and ethylene glycol (EG) molecules were wrapped between the PVA meshes, which together formed a hydrogel structure through hydrogen bonding.
On this basis, Zn2+ was ionically cross-linked with SA and coordinated with PVA, respectively, and physical entanglement between the two networks occurred, forming an interpenetrating dual-network cross-linked polymer hydrogel. This dual-network structure retains the reticular structure formed by ionic cross-linking between SA and Zn2+ and also includes the three-dimensional spatial reticular structure formed by coordination cross-linking between PVA and Zn2+. This interpenetrating dual-network structure endows the hydrogel with excellent mechanical properties and stability. Meanwhile, due to the large number of hydroxyl groups on the surface of EG, hydrogen bonds were formed with water molecules, which enhanced the mechanical properties of the hydrogel and improved the frost resistance and moisturizing properties [57].
In addition, the hydrogen bonding between the molecular chains of PVA and EG strengthened the internal network of the hydrogel, while the aqueous solution of PVA further enhanced the stability of the hydrogel through the physical cross-linking of hydrogen bonding with the crystals during the freeze–thaw process. Finally, ZnSO4 formed conductive ion channels in the co-solvent mixture of EG and water and was isolated by EG. When ZnSO4 was added to the hydrogel, in addition to Zn2+, which was involved in the synthesis of the long-chain structure of the hydrogel, the ionization of the remaining ZnSO4 was able to generate a sufficient number of free-moving ions, which contributed to the improvement of the electrical conductivity of the hydrogel.

2.4. Implementation of a Self-Calibrating Compensation Strategy

In order to solve the problem of resistance drift in hydrogel sensors, this paper adopts an ion compensation strategy to regulate the carrier concentration inside the hydrogel. During the sensor operation, when the hydrogel undergoes carrier polarity migration resulting in an increase in resistance, the ions in the compensation solution added to the interior will continuously diffuse into the hydrogel with osmosis [58] to compensate for the hydrogel carriers. Through this strategy, the resistance drift trend of the hydrogel can be significantly slowed down or even stabilized, which improves the stability and accuracy of the hydrogel sensor in detecting stress and strain and achieves the effect of self-calibration.
The specific realization of the process is shown in Figure 3. After the hydrogel preparation, the mixed solution is poured into the molds (Figure 3a), and a regular slot structure is designed inside the molds. The existence of this groove structure makes the hydrogel freeze–thaw with the internal formation of an empty groove, and the size of the empty groove is 5 mm × 5 mm × 2 mm. Then, a syringe (5 mL capacity, 0.5 × 38 mm needle specifications) is used for the injection of a metal cation salt solution; through the absorption of hydrogel, ions in the interior of the hydrogel participate in ionization to achieve the effect of the compensation of the resistance of the hydrogel drift and thus achieve the self-calibration. Then, the purpose of self-calibration is achieved. The hydrogel side section structure (Figure 3d), profile structure (Figure 3e), and hydrogel profile (Figure 3f) state of the hydrogel injected with ion compensation solution are also shown.

3. Results

3.1. Mechanical Properties of DN-SPEZ Hydrogels

Compared with PVA hydrogels and PVA/SA hydrogels, DN-SPEZ hydrogels exhibited superior mechanical properties, including compression and tensile properties (see Figure 4a). We believe that this can be explained from three aspects: (1) firstly, the dual-network structure of the hydrogel and the hydrogen bonding formed between the EG surface carrying a large number of hydrophilic groups and water molecules enhanced the mechanical properties of the hydrogel; (2) the coordination bond formed by PVA through the coordination with Zn2+ can effectively extend the length of the polymer chain, which allows the tension to be uniformly transferred to the extended polymer chain, giving the DN-SPEZ hydrogels higher tensile and ductile properties; (3) since EG acts as a lubricant after its introduction into the hydrogel, it makes the polymer chains slide more easily and reduces the friction between the polymer chains [59].
Tensile and compression tests were conducted on PVA hydrogels, PVA/SA hydrogels, and DN-SPEZ hydrogels. The typical tensile curves of the different hydrogel formulations are shown in Figure 4a. The maximum tensile change for PVA hydrogel was only 106.2%, while for PVA/SA hydrogel, it was 219.3%. In contrast, the maximum tensile change for DN-SPEZ hydrogel was 245.9%, which is 2.32 times higher than that of PVA hydrogel and PVA/SA hydrogel. The results showed that the dual-network hydrogel was 2.32 times more stable and 1.12 times more yieldable than PVA/SA hydrogel. The study found that the dual-network structure of the hydrogel enhances its stability and increases the yield limit of the material. Additionally, the dual-network hydrogel has a larger tensile range after the introduction of EG, making DN-SPEZ better suited for practical applications that require a wider range of strain monitoring. Figure 4b illustrates the maximum stresses experienced by the PVA hydrogel, PVA/SA hydrogel, and DN-SPEZ hydrogel during the tensile process, which were 0.503 MPa, 0.144 MPa, and 0.367 MPa, respectively. Compared to the maximum tensile change of DN hydrogel (~140%) mentioned by Zeng et al. [60], the maximum tensile change of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in this paper (245.9%) presents an advantage, which is also greater than the mechanical criterion of the maximum strain of hydrogel sensors for monitoring human body movements (~55%) [61].
Additionally, we conducted a compression test to examine the impact of EG on the dual-network hydrogel. As shown in Figure 4c,d, the maximum compressive stress of the PVA hydrogel at 90% strain was 0.89 MPa, while for the PVA/SA hydrogel, it was 1.04 MPa, and for the DN-SPEZ hydrogel, it was 1.27 MPa. Zeng et al. [60] mentioned that the maximum compressive stress of DN hydrogel in reaching 90% deformation is 321.1 kpa, which is much lower than that of DN-SPEZ (1.27 MPa) in terms of compressive capacity. This suggests that the DN-SPEZ hydrogel, prepared in this study, has superior compressive properties and can withstand greater pressure without damage or deformation. Compared to the other two hydrogels, the DN-SPEZ hydrogel exhibits higher strength and stiffness, making it suitable for underwater applications that require superior compressive properties.

3.2. Physical Properties of DN-SPEZ Hydrogels

The physical properties of hydrogels are crucial for their practical applications due to the strict requirements of their mechanical properties in the environment they are exposed to. Figure 5a–c display the sample states of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel used in this paper for different time periods. Figure 5d demonstrates that the hydrogel can withstand a weight of 500 g. Figure 5e,f show the length of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel before and after stretching, respectively. The initial length was 42 mm, and the post-stretching length was 121 mm, which is approximately 2.88 times the initial length. Additionally, even after the hydrogel is twisted by 1080°, its length can still be stretched to 110 mm (Figure 5g), which is approximately 2.62 times the initial length. The results suggest that DN-SPEZ hydrogels exhibit exceptional toughness and ductility.
With the introduction of EG, the DN-SPEZ hydrogel possesses excellent low-temperature tolerance, which offers the possibility of its use as a temperature sensor. Figure 6a,b demonstrate the temperature-sensitive properties of DN-SPEZ hydrogel and PVA/SA hydrogel without added EG in the temperature range from −20 °C to 60 °C. The hydrogel is characterized by a negative temperature coefficient (NTC), which is the same as the temperature sensitivity. As the temperature increases, the resistance of the hydrogel decreases and exhibits a negative temperature coefficient (NTC) property, which also visualizes the temperature detection capability of the hydrogel sensor from the perspective of temperature sensitivity. Temperature sensitivity (TS) is defined as follows [Equation (1)] [62]:
T S = R R 0 R 0 × T
The formula defines R0 as the initial resistance, R as the resistance at a specific temperature, and ΔT as the difference between the current temperature and the initial temperature. The unit of temperature sensitivity is expressed as %/°C. The temperature sensitivity characteristic curves of Figure 6a,b were linearly fitted using origin software, and the slopes of the fitted curves showed that the temperature sensitivity of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel sensor with EG addition was −1.22%/°C in the temperature range of −20–60 °C. In comparison, the temperature sensitivity of the hydrogel without added EG was only −0.87%/°C. Meanwhile, the linearity of the temperature sensitivity characteristic curve of DN-SPEZ hydrogel with EG addition was more obvious compared with that of the hydrogel without added EG. Xu et al. [63] synthesized and assembled a Li+/agar/pHEAA DN dual-network hydrogel sensor for stress–strain monitoring of human body movement, and it had good nonlinear temperature-sensitive characteristics only in the interval of 30–60 °C, whereas DN-SPEZ presents not only a better temperature range, but also a better linearity in the temperature sensitivity curve.
Figure 6c,d demonstrate the temperature sensitivity reproducibility of DN-SPEZ hydrogel at temperatures ranging from 25 °C to 60 °C and from −20 °C to 25 °C, respectively, although it was different from that of the hydrogel of Zou et al. [62], who proposed an SNPG multimodal hydrogel sensor, for which the degree of temperature response was relatively low (∆R/R0 of SNPG is about 143% at −20 °C and 68% at 55 °C); the ∆R/R0 of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel is 52.34% at −20 °C and 57.26% at 60 °C, but it still demonstrates a good temperature-sensing repeatability in temperature sensing. The wide temperature measurement range and stability further endow the hydrogel sensor with the potential to become a wearable device, e.g., for extreme ambient temperature detection or for helping the human body to collect elements of environmental information.
Figure 6e shows the water retention ratio of the hydrogel before and after the introduction of different amounts of EG in a room temperature environment (25 °C, 50% RH), which is described as the water retention behavior of the hydrogel. The ratio in the legend is the volume ratio of deionized water to EG. The hydrogels were weighed and placed at room temperature and weighed after water loss at one-hour intervals over a period of 27 h. The water retention (WR) of the hydrogel was defined as follows [Equation (2)] [64]:
W a t e r   r e n t e n t i o n = W S W 0
where W0 is the initial weight of the hydrogel and WS is the weight measured at the current moment after the hydrogel lost water. At the 27th hour, the dissolution rate of the PVA/SA hydrogel was 10.90%, whereas the water retention levels of the DN-SPEZ hydrogels with the volume ratios of deionized water to EG of 14:1, 13:2, and 12:3 were 13.31%, 14.33%, and 16.06%, which were only 1.22, 1.31, and 1.47 times higher than those of the former, respectively. With the increasing content of introduced EG, it can be seen that the water retention performance of hydrogel at room temperature is gradually improved, and EG can confer good water retention ability to hydrogel [59]. In addition, Tang et al. [65] have also proposed an approach to improve the water retention capacity of DN hydrogels by increasing the concentration of CaCl2 in the hydrogel. Due to the strong hygroscopicity of CaCl2, DN hydrogels containing 30 wt.% of CaCl2 can capture water molecules from the atmosphere. Based on the strong hygroscopicity of CaCl2, the dehydrated DN hydrogel can regenerate itself by spontaneously capturing water molecules from the surrounding environment.
Figure 6f demonstrates the water absorption and swelling characteristics of the hydrogel before and after the introduction of different amounts of EG, which is described as the swelling behavior of the hydrogel. The ratio in the legend indicates the volume ratio of deionized water to EG. The hydrogels were weighed and immersed in deionized water at room temperature and were chosen to be weighed after water absorption and swelling at one-hour intervals over a period of 27 h. The swelling rate (SR) of the hydrogel was defined as follows [Equation (3)] [66]:
S R = W S W 0 W 0
At the 27th hour, the SR of the PVA/SA hydrogel was 96.82%, while the swelling rates of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel with the volume ratios of deionized water to EG of 14:1, 13:2, and 12:3 were 80.96%, 76.68%, and 73.75%, respectively, which were only 0.836, 0.792, and 0.762 times higher than those of the former, respectively. Compared to the Gel@BC bilayer hydrogel proposed by Hou et al. [67], the swelling rate of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel with a volume ratio of deionized water to EG of 12:3 (36.57%) was much lower than that of the Gel@BC bilayer hydrogel at the optimum ratio (~75%) at the 8th hour of the experiment. We believe that the results of the water retention and swelling tests can be explained by two main mechanisms. First, the incorporation of EG molecules, through the formation of hydrogen bonding interactions with water molecules, will form a protective layer that slows down the rate of penetration of water molecules into the internal structure of the hydrogel, thus limiting the free diffusion of water molecules in the hydrogel. Second, the presence of EG molecules hinders the free diffusion of water molecules in the hydrogel, further reducing the penetration rate of water molecules. The combination of these two effects led to a certain reduction in the swelling rate of the hydrogels with the addition of EG. By adding EG, it was found that the hydrogel swelling rate could be effectively slowed down, making our sensor less susceptible to dimensional changes due to water-absorbing swelling under operating conditions, in order to improve the stability and reliability of the monitoring of DN-SPEZ hydrogel sensors, which is crucial for sensors that need to work stably for long periods of time and be used under complex environmental conditions. Therefore, by introducing EG into the hydrogel composition to enhance the anti-swelling properties of the hydrogel, the stability of the sensor during the monitoring process can be enhanced, which can better meet the practical needs of this sensor in many amphibious scenarios.

3.3. Pressure Sensitivity and Strain Sensitivity

Combining the mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of the hydrogels, we comprehensively analyzed and studied the pressure sensitivity and tensile sensitivity of DN-SPEZ hydrogels. As shown in Figure 7a, the relative resistance change of DN-SPEZ hydrogel changed significantly when it was squeezed, and since the trend of resistance change of DN-SPEZ under different pressure strains was not consistent, the pressure sensitivity (PS) of DN-SPEZ hydrogel was calculated by ∆R/R0 with the pressure (P) applied to the hydrogel according to the following equation [Equation (4)] [62]:
P S = R R 0 R 0 × P
A change in pressure sensitivity (PS) was observed. The PS was 1.107 kPa−1 at an applied pressure of 0–10.4 kPa, 0.122 kPa−1 at 10.4–116 kPa, and 0.0319 kPa−1 at 116–281.3 kPa. PS changes in hydrogels are mainly influenced by their internal structure, which consists of polymer chains and adsorbed water molecules. In the low-pressure state, the distance between the polymer chains and water molecules within the hydrogel is large, making the polymer chains more flexible and the water molecules free to move. When pressure is applied externally, it leads to an increase in the carrier migration speed inside the hydrogel, while the network structure inside the neighboring hydrogel generates more conductive pathways due to the initial squeezing contact [68], which results in a larger change in the electrical signal and makes the sensor highly sensitive. However, with a further increase in pressure, the distance between the polymer chains and water molecules within the hydrogel gradually decreases, resulting in the double network structure of the hydrogel interpenetration becoming tighter, limiting the movement of carriers. This structural change reduces the sensitivity of the hydrogel to external pressure because the reduced spacing of the internal network decreases the space for the carriers to move, resulting in a reduced change in the electrical signal when the hydrogel is subjected to the same pressure change, which reduces the sensitivity of the sensor. The DN hydrogel mentioned by Zeng et al. [60] shows the same segmentation of the pressure sensitivity in the 0–1 kPa and 1–3.5 kPa intervals despite the linearity of the pressure sensitivities, compared to the DN-SPEZ hydrogel mentioned in this paper. The gel is larger in the pressure range (0–281.3 kPa) compared to the DN-SPEZ hydrogel mentioned in this paper.
In addition to the pressure sensitivity performance, we also investigated the tensile strain sensitivity of DN-SPEZ hydrogels. As shown in Figure 7b, the relative resistance change of the hydrogel, ∆R/R0, was significantly correlated with the tensile strain (Strain). When the strain reaches 213%, the relative change in resistance ∆R/R0 reaches 57%. We found that the GF varied continuously in different tensile strain ranges, and the tensile range ΔR/R0 tended to vary linearly in the 30–120%, 30–120%, and 120–213% segments; the linear fitting function of the origin software was utilized to calculate the strain sensitivity (GF). In the 0–30% tensile strain range, the GF was 1.292; in the 30–120% strain range, the GF was 0.143; and in the 120–213% strain range, the GF was 0.0757. In smaller tensile ranges, the internal structure of the hydrogel changed more significantly, and the resistance change was more sensitive. With the increase in stretching range, the internal structure change of hydrogel is weakened, and the degree of resistance change is reduced accordingly, resulting in a decrease in GF. We believe that this phenomenon is due to the deformation of the internal structure of the hydrogel after stretching; the ion channel shrinks and narrows, and the polar migration path of ions becomes longer, but the degree of lengthening gradually decreases, and the rate of resistance growth slows down [69]. Compared to the DN hydrogel mentioned by Zeng et al. [60], the DN-SPEZ hydrogel has a larger range of tensile strain. The above results highlight the advantages of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in terms of pressure and strain sensitivity, providing practical value and significance for its application in the field of stress–strain sensors. This DN-SPEZ hydrogel with good sensitivity and tunable performance can be widely used in the fields of medical treatment, health monitoring, and human–computer interaction.

3.4. Compensation Effects of Performing Self-Calibrating Compensation Strategies Using Different Solutions

We chose LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions as the compensation solutions for hydrogels to perform self-calibration for the study. On the one hand, lithium, sodium, and potassium, as elements of the same group, have different degrees of influence on the conductivity of hydrogels due to the differences in their electron arrangement and ionic radii in the ionic state. On the other hand, sodium, magnesium, and aluminum, as elements of the same cycle, also exhibit differences in electrical properties due to differences in atomic nuclear charges, which in turn affect their migration states in the hydrogel, despite their similarities in electron arrangement. Therefore, the rationality of choosing lithium, sodium, potassium, magnesium, and aluminum for carrier compensation testing lies in the ability to utilize their similarities and differences to comprehensively assess the effects of different compensation solutions on hydrogel properties.
As shown in Figure 8, hydrogels made from the same batch were taken and injected with 0.05 mL of a 1 mol/L solution of LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, or AlCl3. They were then connected to the test circuit at room temperature to start an 8-day resistance test to verify the effectiveness of the ion compensation measures described in this paper. A control group of uncompensated hydrogels was also chosen for the experiment. Figure 8a shows the changes in resistance of LiCl, NaCl, and KCl ion-compensated hydrogels over 192 h. The uncompensated control group had a continuously increasing resistance, with a ∆R/R0 of 9772.35% by the 192nd hour of the experiment. In contrast, the ion-compensated hydrogels had a slower rising trend, with the hydrogel compensated with KCl solution showing the slowest rising trend. The resistance of the hydrogel compensated with KCl reached 9772.35% during the test. During the test, the maximum value of ∆R/R0 for the hydrogel compensated with KCl solution was only 1526.67%, while the control group had a ∆R/R0 6.4 times higher than that of the hydrogel compensated with KCl solution. To clearly show the compensation effect of various solutions, Figure 8b presents a local magnification of Figure 8a. The LiCl-compensated hydrogel ∆R/R0 exhibited a normal upward trend in the first 10 h of the experiment, followed by a slowdown in growth, and finally a rapid upward trend. On the other hand, the NaCl-compensated hydrogel ∆R/R0 initially showed slow growth, followed by a downward trend in growth as shown in Figure 8a,b. Figure 8c illustrates the relationship between the hydrogel drift curves of the uncompensated experimental group and the drift curves of LiCl, NaCl, and KCl after compensation at the 192nd hour of the experiment. The reduction reached 9171.6% after LiCl compensation, 9736.1% after NaCl compensation, and 8943.5% after KCl compensation, compared to the ∆R/R0 of the uncompensated hydrogel.
Figure 8d shows the resistance change of hydrogels with ionic compensation by NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3. The hydrogel compensated with MgCl2 solution had a maximum ∆R/R0 value of only 597.93% during the test, while the maximum resistance change of the control group was 16.3 times that of the hydrogel compensated with MgCl2 solution. The solutions of NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 all slowed down the growth of the hydrogel resistance trend after compensation. Figure 8e shows a localized enlargement of Figure 8d. Figure 8f demonstrates the relationship between the difference in hydrogel drift curves of the uncompensated experimental group and the drift curves of LiCl, NaCl, and KCl after compensation at the 192nd hour of the experiment. The reduction reached 9178.1% after MgCl2 compensation and 9765.5% after AlCl3 compensation. Therefore, we believe that the compensation solution of the hydrogel in this paper is due to osmotic pressure and water absorption. The ions enter the hydrogel and increase the concentration of carriers, which alleviates the effect of hydrogel resistance drift.
Although the hydrogel sensor still suffers from a continuous increase in resistance due to carrier polarity migration during operation, the use of the compensation solution significantly mitigates this trend, allowing the compensated hydrogel to exhibit better stability and accuracy. Therefore, this self-calibrating compensation strategy provides practical value for the application of hydrogel sensors, which can ensure the accuracy and stability of the monitoring data, thus improving the performance of the sensors and making them more reliable in practical applications.

3.5. Application Effect of DN-SPEZ Hydrogel Self-Calibrating Compensation Sensor

In order to investigate the characteristics of DN-SPEZ hydrogels after the self-calibration of pressure sensors using different compensation solutions, we still chose LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions for the self-calibration compensation and performed pressure tests on the compensated hydrogels using a universal test bench with a test pressure of 200 kPa. Figure 9a,d demonstrate the pressure fatigue test of DN-SPEZ hydrogel after ionic compensation using LiCl, NaCl, and KCl with the same main group metal cation salt solution and the uncompensated DN-SPEZ hydrogel. LiCl has a better compensating effect, and we believe that Li+, Na+, and K+ are all monovalent cations carrying the same charge in the atomic structure, while Li+ has a smaller ionic radius (0.76 Å) [70], so the charge density of Li+ is larger, giving Li+ hydrogel internal network channels higher ion mobility, so in the hydrogel sensor conductive pathway, Li+ can be more effective in supplementing the carriers in the hydrogel, slowing down the phenomenon of ion migration within the hydrogel, so as to improve the resistance stability of the hydrogel, which will make the results of the pressure fatigue test more stable and reduce the drift phenomenon. The compensation effect of NaCl and KCl is the next best; due to the relatively large ionic radii (Na+: 1.02 Å, K+: 1.38 Å) [70], the corresponding charge concentration is lower, the ionic mobility is lower compared to Li+, and the efficiency of compensating for the carriers in the hydrogel is also relatively poor, so the resistance of the hydrogel has a poorer compensation effect.
In summary, the self-calibration compensation of hydrogels using different ion solutions is an effective strategy to significantly reduce the hydrogel resistance drift phenomenon. Although the introduction of some ions may lead to a reduction in the pressure sensitivity of the hydrogel, stability is crucial in hydrogel pressure sensing applications. Therefore, even though the pressure sensitivity is sacrificed to some extent, the stability of the hydrogel resistance is ensured by the compensation mechanism, which will be of positive significance in realizing the reliability and long-term stability of hydrogels in the field of pressure sensing.
As shown in Figure 10a–d, the pressure fatigue tests of DN-SPEZ hydrogels after ionic compensation using NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 for the same cycle of metal cation salt solutions and uncompensated DN-SPEZ hydrogels are demonstrated. We observed that the MgCl2 and AlCl3 compensation showed a more stable trend with less drift in the pressure fatigue test of the hydrogels, while the NaCl compensation performed poorly. The Mg2+ and Al3+, while possessing smaller ionic radii (Mg2+: 0.72 Å, Al3+: 0.535 Å) [70], carry larger charges, allowing them to have higher charge densities as well as higher ion mobility within the hydrogel, thus providing a stable source of carriers more efficiently during the compensation process, which is conducive to maintaining the conductivity of the hydrogel and thus reducing the drift phenomenon in the test. In contrast, Na+ has a lower charge density and lower ion mobility, making its compensation performance worse compared to Mg2+ and Al3+, but it still shows a compensation effect compared to the uncompensated control group.
In order to be able to quantify the effect of the hydrogel after performing the self-calibration compensation strategy, inspired by the way D. Lewis [71], Bandari [72], and Adam [73] dealt with the processing of the nonlinear response data handling, we decided to use the nonlinear curve-fitting function of the origin software to fit the self-calibration compensation of the LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions. For the pressure response curves, as shown in Figure 11, we used the ExpGrow model with a better fitting effect, as shown in the following equation [Equation (5)]:
f ( x ) = f ( x 0 ) + A 1 × e x x 0 t 1
where f ( x ) describes the ∆R/R0 of the fitted curve for the autocovariance time x , A1 is the amplitude parameter of the exponential term, x 0 is the translation parameter of the exponential function, f ( x 0 ) is the initial offset when x = x 0 , and t1 is the decay/growth rate parameter of this exponential function, which controls the rate of change of this function. To clarify the numerical difference between the fitted value of the curve and the actual value of the offset, the following equations were used [Equations (6) and (7)]:
ϵ i = y 0 f ( x i )
ϵ ¯ = 1 n i = 1 n ϵ i
where y 0 represents the initial value of ∆R/R0 in the actual test curve, x 0 represents the ∆R/R0 value of the fitted curve at that time, ϵ i represents the absolute deviation between the fitted value and the actual initial value, and ϵ ¯ represents the average deviation value. The size of the ϵ ¯ value corresponding to the different experimental groups represents the stability of the sensor in the experimental process. The larger the value, the greater the offset of the fitted curve, i.e., the more unstable; conversely, the smaller the value, the better the stability of the sensor during use. The average deviation ϵ ¯ for the uncompensated group tested in air was calculated to be 0.02004269. For the LiCl-compensated group, it was 0.00007261; for NaCl-compensated, it was 0.01061724; for KCl, it was 0.00675606; for MgCl2, it was 0.00065474; and for AlCl3, it was 0.00147718. The average deviation of the resistance drift of the uncompensated group in air is 276.158, 1.888, 2.971, 30.586, and 13.561 times that of the LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 compensation groups, respectively, and the larger the multiplier is, the better the compensation effect is. The results obtained indicate that the stability of the sensors in exposed air applications is improved compared to the uncompensated sensors after self-calibration compensation using LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions.
To further investigate the effectiveness of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel after performing ion compensation in underwater environments, we chose artificial seawater [74] as the study object to evaluate the feasibility of the self-calibrated compensation strategy for hydrogel. As shown in Figure 12a–f, compared with the test results in air (see Figure 9 and Figure 10), the ∆R/R0 of all the test samples showed an enhancement. And the average deviations calculated for the uncompensated group, LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 when applied in a seawater environment are 0.01451029, 0.00140914, 0.01439897, 0.01250539, 0.0029094, and 0.01134193, respectively. For the resistive drifts for the uncompensated group in seawater, the average deviation is 10.287, 1.008, 1.161, 4.986, and 1.281 times that of the LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 compensated groups, respectively. This indicates that in terms of stability during underwater application, the DN-SPEZ hydrogels that we chose for pre-compensation with LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 ionic solutions still all showed good stability compared to the uncompensated group. The ranking of the compensation effect in both scenarios was LiCl > MgCl2 > AlCl3 > KCl > NaCl, showing consistency, which further proves that the hydrogel with the self-calibrated compensation strategy has a wide range of applications in amphibious environments. The results of this study not only provide an important reference for the application of hydrogels in amphibious application scenarios, such as human wearable flexible devices, ocean engineering, and underwater detection, but also provide new ideas and directions for further optimization and application of hydrogel-based pressure sensors.
In order to study the effect of the concentration of the compensation solution on the self-calibration compensation of DN-SPEZ hydrogel, this paper chooses LiCl compensation, which has the best compensation effect in air and sea environments, as an example, and the concentration of the compensation solution is chosen to be 1 mol/L, 2 mol/L, 3 mol/L, and 4 mol/L of LiCl solution in a dosage of 0.05 mL. For the post-compensation pressure response plots of different concentrations of LiCl solutions, the ExpGrow model was selected to fit the floating trend of the response curves with the coordinate origin of the fitted curves, and a comparison of the compensation effect of different concentrations of LiCl in air (Figure 13a) and seawater (Figure 13b) can be observed. When tested in air, the ϵ ¯ after LiCl compensation was 0.00007261, 0.00006363, 0.000059, and 0.000052886 for concentrations of 1 mol/L, 2 mol/L, 3 mol/L, and 4 mol/L; and when tested in artificial seawater, the ϵ ¯ after LiCl compensation was 0.00140914, 0.001350766, 0.00132311, and 0.001257 for concentrations of 1 mol/L, 2 mol/L, 3 mol/L, and 4 mol/L. L of LiCl after compensation, respectively. A smaller value of ϵ ¯ indicates a better compensation effect. The results showed “1 mol/L < 2 mol/L < 3 mol/L < 4 mol/L” for both tests in air and seawater, suggesting that high concentrations of LiCl provide more free carriers when compensating DN-SPEZ hydrogels as the compensating solution penetrates into the hydrogel.
The results of this study not only provide an important reference for the application of hydrogel in amphibious application scenarios, such as human wearable flexible devices, ocean engineering, and underwater detection, but also provide new ideas and directions for the further optimization and application of hydrogel-based pressure sensors.

3.6. Multi-Scenario Application of DN-SPEZ Hydrogel Self-Calibrating Compensation Sensor

Based on the self-calibration compensation study, the LiCl-solution-compensated hydrogels showed good stability and pressure-sensitive properties. Figure 14a–i demonstrated the practical application of DN-SPEZ hydrogels in the self-calibration compensated state of LiCl solution (1 mol/L). As shown in Figure 14a,b, the hydrogel was tested in a seawater environment by tapping the hydrogel using Morse code, denoting the name abbreviation “SZH” as well as the school’s name abbreviation “TJU” with a short bandwidth denoting “ . ” and long bandwidth denoting “—”; it can be seen that the hydrogel can still respond effectively to short taps in a seawater environment. Figure 14c demonstrates the application of DN-SPEZ hydrogel as a human swallowing monitoring sensor, specifically for detecting swallowing changes in the pharynx when drinking water. The compensated DN-SPEZ hydrogel sensor can effectively monitor small movements such as swallowing, with feedback ∆R/R0 reaching 3%. Therefore, the self-calibration compensation strategy is a feasible and effective approach for wearable hydrogel sensors.
When the DN-SPEZ hydrogel in the self-calibrated compensated state of LiCl solution was attached to a 3D-printed hand model, a sandbag press (Figure 14d), a small ball press, and a small ball placed in seawater, the DN-SPEZ self-calibrated sensors fed back the press stresses as shown in Figure 14d–f. Compared to the maximum ∆R/R0 of 9.8% achieved for the pressing response of the sphere placed in air (Figure 14e), the pressing response of the sphere placed in seawater (Figure 14f) exhibits a larger ∆R/R0, which can reach a maximum of 21.7%. We believe that the ions in seawater enter the interior of the hydrogel with the osmotic process, which increases the concentration of carriers inside the hydrogel and thus improves the pressure sensing performance, and the pressure from the water is also an important factor contributing to the larger ∆R/R0.
To demonstrate the sensitivity of the DN-SPEZ self-calibrating hydrogel sensor in human wear scenarios, we encapsulated and fixed it on the wrist using adhesive tape for wrist bending monitoring (Figure 14g). The bending angle ranged from 0° to 60°, and the ∆R/R0 varied from 0% to 52.1%. Additionally, we enclosed and secured a wooden hand model to monitor fixed-amplitude finger bending (see Figure 14h). The bending angles ranged from 0° to 90°, and the ∆R/R0 changes ranged from 0% to 47.8%. Finally, we tested the resistance change of the package when bending at different angles on the index finger joint (see Figure 14i). The results showed that the ∆R/R0 increased as the bending amplitude of the finger increased: 5.2% for bending up to 15°, 7.4% for bending up to 30°, 14.8% for bending up to 60°, and 17.2% for bending up to 90°. The monitoring results demonstrate the feasibility of the DN-SPEZ self-calibrating hydrogel sensor in various wearable scenarios.

4. Discussion

In summary, with the application of the self-calibration compensation scheme, DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogels can be used as strain and pressure sensors. At the same time, the introduction of EG, on the one hand, makes the DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogel sensors in underwater application scenarios maintain a stable size and shape; they will not be affected by the water and over-expansion, to a certain extent, preventing the hydrogel sensor from undergoing sensing distortion or damage. On the other hand, the DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogel has better temperature-sensitive characteristics and can still work normally in a −20 °C low-temperature environment, possessing the potential to be used as a sensor in extreme environments.
Moreover, when the self-calibration compensation program DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogel is applied to strain and pressure sensors, compared with sensors without self-calibration compensation, the stability of fatigue test and the pressure and strain sensing characteristics of LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 solutions, for example, are improved to different degrees, reducing the resistance drift phenomenon caused by the hydrogel sensors in the working circuit. The negative impact of the resistance drift phenomenon in the working circuit of the hydrogel sensor is reduced. The results of the subsequent tests in the seawater environment show that although the carriers in the seawater environment enter the hydrogel to improve the pressure sensing performance of the sensor, the compensation effect is consistent with that in the air, which still reflects the advantage of implementing the self-calibration compensation strategy. Further exploring the advantages and disadvantages of the compensation effects of LiCl, NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3, in addition to the concentration of the compensation solution, we believe that the size of the cation radius is an important factor in determining the compensation effect, but the mobility of the ions in the hydrogel is also affected by the charge carried by the cations, in which the ordering of the compensation effects of ‘LiCl > MgCl2 > AlCl3’ is exactly the same as that of the charge carried by their corresponding cations. We believe that the ions in the compensating solution migrate polarly under the influence of the electric field of the hydrogel energizing circuit, but the negative nodes (hydroxyl and carboxyl groups) of the polymer functional groups in the structure of the DN-SPEZ hydrogel produce a “Coulombic resistance” to the movement of the positively charged ions, and therefore, although Al3+ and Mg2+ have higher charge density in the hydrogel, the “Coulomb resistance” of the negatively charged nodes is stronger, and the polar mobility becomes lower accordingly, which also explains the ordering of the compensation effect of ‘LiCl > MgCl2 > AlCl3’, as shown in Figure 15.
Finally, we also show the multi-scenario test results obtained when the self-calibration compensation scheme was applied to DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogels to realize applications such as sending messages in Morse code in seawater environments, monitoring swallowing motions, sensing the force of a robotic hand pressing an object in air and an object in water, sensing wrist bending, and sensing underwater bending of fingers.

5. Conclusions

The application of the self-calibration compensation scheme in DN-SPEZ dual-network hydrogels provides an ideal and feasible strategy for designing strain and pressure sensors suitable for various amphibious scenarios. Meanwhile, the results of this study also demonstrate that the hydrogel self-calibration compensation strategy has great potential and far-reaching significance in the field of flexible wearable sensors. In hydrogel sensing and monitoring in different application scenarios, in addition to increasing the concentration of the compensation solution within a limited range, we take the ionic radius and the amount of charge carried by the metal cation as measured and select compensation solutions with different compositions purposely to compensate the resistive drift of hydrogel sensors with different demands, and this strategy can effectively realize the controllable self-calibrated compensation of hydrogel sensors.

Author Contributions

Z.S. proposed the idea, conducted the experiments, and analyzed the data. Y.Y. and B.L. assisted in the analysis of the mechanical properties of the hydrogels and in the construction of the field application test scenarios, and T.X. provided the equipment for recording SEM images. Q.Z. supervised the work and assisted all authors in writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created for this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, Z.; Song, H.; Chen, L.; Li, W.; Yang, D.; Cheng, P.; Duan, H. 3D Printed Ultrasensitive Graphene Hydrogel Self-Adhesive Wearable Devices. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 5199–5207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, X.; Wang, H.; Luo, J.; Ren, G.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Jia, P. Ultrastretchable, Adhesive, Anti-Freezing, Conductive, and Self-Healing Hydrogel for Wearable Devices. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2022, 4, 1784–1793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. An, R.; Zhang, B.; Han, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Ran, R. Strain-Sensitivity Conductive MWCNTs Composite Hydrogel for Wearable Device and near-Infrared Photosensor. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 8515–8530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ying, B.; Liu, X. Skin-like Hydrogel Devices for Wearable Sensing, Soft Robotics and Beyond. iScience 2021, 24, 103174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Chen, Z.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y.; Zheng, X.; Liu, H.; Li, H. Multiple-Stimuli-Responsive and Cellulose Conductive Ionic Hydrogel for Smart Wearable Devices and Thermal Actuators. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 1353–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chen, Z.; Chen, Y.; Hedenqvist, M.S.; Chen, C.; Cai, C.; Li, H.; Liu, H.; Fu, J. Multifunctional Conductive Hydrogels and Their Applications as Smart Wearable Devices. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 2561–2583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, L.; Xu, T.; Zhang, X. Multifunctional Conductive Hydrogel-Based Flexible Wearable Sensors. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2021, 134, 116130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guo, Y.; Yin, F.; Li, Y.; Shen, G.; Lee, J. Incorporating Wireless Strategies to Wearable Devices Enabled by a Photocurable Hydrogel for Monitoring Pressure Information. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, 2300855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Tang, S.; Liu, Z.; Xiang, X. Graphene Oxide Composite Hydrogels for Wearable Devices. Carbon Lett. 2022, 32, 1395–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Garg, V.; Gupta, T.; Rani, S.; Bandyopadhyay-Ghosh, S.; Ghosh, S.B.; Qiao, L.; Liu, G. A Hierarchically Designed Nanocomposite Hydrogel with Multisensory Capabilities towards Wearable Devices for Human-Body Motion and Glucose Concentration Detection. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2021, 213, 108894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Han, F.; Xie, X.; Wang, T.; Cao, C.; Li, J.; Sun, T.; Liu, H.; Geng, S.; Wei, Z.; Li, J.; et al. Wearable Hydrogel-Based Epidermal Sensor with Thermal Compatibility and Long Term Stability for Smart Colorimetric Multi-Signals Monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, 12, 2201730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ling, Q.; Ke, T.; Liu, W.; Ren, Z.; Zhao, L.; Gu, H. Tough, Repeatedly Adhesive, Cyclic Compression-Stable, and Conductive Dual-Network Hydrogel Sensors for Human Health Monitoring. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2021, 60, 18373–18383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xue, G.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhou, H.; Chen, Z.; Guo, W.; Yang, Y.; Ye, M. Merkel Cell-Inspired Skin-like Hybrid Hydrogels for Wearable Health Monitoring. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 456, 140976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hua, J.; Su, M.; Sun, X.; Li, J.; Sun, Y.; Qiu, H.; Shi, Y.; Pan, L. Hydrogel-Based Bioelectronics and Their Applications in Health Monitoring. Biosensors 2023, 13, 696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tejavibulya, N.; Colburn, D.A.M.; Marcogliese, F.A.; Yang, K.-A.; Guo, V.; Chowdhury, S.; Stojanovic, M.N.; Sia, S.K. Hydrogel Microfilaments toward Intradermal Health Monitoring. iScience 2019, 21, 328–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lyu, X.; Hu, Y.; Shi, S.; Wang, S.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, K. Hydrogel Bioelectronics for Health Monitoring. Biosensors 2023, 13, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hu, N.; Hong, B.; Yan, X.; Wu, H.; Zhong, Q.; Qi, D.; Wang, W.; Lei, L.; Fan, H.; Müller-Buschbaum, P. Hybrid Hydrogel-Based Skin Health Monitor for Tracing Solar UV Radiation in Aqueous Environments. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. 2023, 5, 7528–7538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Huang, H.; Sun, C.; Yu, J.; Wang, M.; Dong, T.; Wang, S.; Chen, X.; Cui, T.; Li, J. Flexible Accelerated-Wound-Healing Antibacterial Hydrogel-Nanofiber Scaffold for Intelligent Wearable Health Monitoring. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 16, 5438–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, J.; Ding, Q.; Wang, H.; Wu, Z.; Gui, X.; Li, C.; Hu, N.; Tao, K.; Wu, J. Engineering Smart Composite Hydrogels for Wearable Disease Monitoring. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lei, H.; Zhao, J.; Ma, X.; Li, H.; Fan, D. Antibacterial Dual Network Hydrogels for Sensing and Human Health Monitoring. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021, 10, 2101089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiu, Y.; Wang, Y.-L.; Tang, W.-J.; Wu, T.-J.; Huang, P.; Yu, Q.; Xu, L.; Zhang, X.-S. An Ultra-Thin Transparent Multi-Functional Sensor Based on Silk Hydrogel for Health Monitoring. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2022, 32, 084003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Shen, B.; Li, J.; Tang, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, F. An Ultra-Stretchable Sensitive Hydrogel Sensor for Human Motion and Pulse Monitoring. Micromachines 2021, 12, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Sheng, F.; Yi, J.; Shen, S.; Cheng, R.; Ning, C.; Ma, L.; Peng, X.; Deng, W.; Dong, K.; Wang, Z.L. Self-Powered Smart Arm Training Band Sensor Based on Extremely Stretchable Hydrogel Conductors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 44868–44877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tang, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, B.; Chen, X.; Han, Y.; Guo, M.; Xia, H.; Song, R.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, J. In Situ Forming Epidermal Bioelectronics for Daily Monitoring and Comprehensive Exercise. ACS Nano 2022, 16, 17931–17947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hu, Z.; Chen, T.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, P.; Ji, X.; Xu, M. Flexible and Wearable Hydrogel-Based Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Self-Power Sensing in Boxing Match. In Proceedings of the 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC), Beijing, China, 22–24 October 2021; IEEE: Beijing, China, 2021; pp. 3623–3628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zou, J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, S.-J.; Mi, H.-Y.; Hu, X.-S.; Zhang, Z.; Shang, Y.-H.; Jing, X. A Stretchable and Zigzag Structured Hydrogel for Highly Sensitive Strain Sensors. Mater. Lett. 2022, 325, 132835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sun, F.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, C.; Ouyang, B.; Zhao, T.; Li, C.; Ba, N.; Li, X.; Chen, S.; Che, T.; et al. A Flexible Lightweight Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Protector and Scoring System in Taekwondo Competition Monitoring. Electronics 2022, 11, 1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cho, H.-J.; Kim, I.-D.; Jung, S.M. Multifunctional Inorganic Nanomaterial Aerogel Assembled into fSWNT Hydrogel Platform for Ultraselective NO2 Sensing. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 10637–10647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kim, M.; Lee, S.; Yoon, I.; Kook, G.; Jung, Y.; Bawazir, S.; Stefanini, C.; Lee, H. Polypyrrole/Agarose Hydrogel-Based Bladder Volume Sensor with a Resistor Ladder Structure. Sensors 2018, 18, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, K.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Xu, L.; Feng, N.; Wang, Y.; Fei, X.; Tian, J.; Li, Y. Synthesis of a Novel Anti-Freezing, Non-Drying Antibacterial Hydrogel Dressing by One-Pot Method. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 372, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Q.; Pan, X.; Lin, C.; Lin, D.; Ni, Y.; Chen, L.; Huang, L.; Cao, S.; Ma, X. Biocompatible, Self-Wrinkled, Antifreezing and Stretchable Hydrogel-Based Wearable Sensor with PEDOT: Sulfonated Lignin as Conductive Materials. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 370, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bao, D.; Wen, Z.; Shi, J.; Xie, L.; Jiang, H.; Jiang, J.; Yang, Y.; Liao, W.; Sun, X. An Anti-Freezing Hydrogel Based Stretchable Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Biomechanical Energy Harvesting at Sub-Zero Temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 13787–13794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yu, B.; Wang, C.; Ju, Y.M.; West, L.; Harmon, J.; Moussy, Y.; Moussy, F. Use of Hydrogel Coating to Improve the Performance of Implanted Glucose Sensors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 23, 1278–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yu, J.-Y.; Moon, S.E.; Kim, J.H.; Kang, S.M. Ultrasensitive and Highly Stretchable Multiple-Crosslinked Ionic Hydrogel Sensors with Long-Term Stability. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liang, Y.; Ye, L.; Sun, X.; Lv, Q.; Liang, H. Tough and Stretchable Dual Ionically Cross-Linked Hydrogel with High Conductivity and Fast Recovery Property for High-Performance Flexible Sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 1577–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sun, X.; Yao, F.; Li, J. Nanocomposite Hydrogel-Based Strain and Pressure Sensors: A Review. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 18605–18623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Y.-Z.; Lee, K.H.; Anjum, D.H.; Sougrat, R.; Jiang, Q.; Kim, H.; Alshareef, H.N. MXenes Stretch Hydrogel Sensor Performance to New Limits. Sci. Adv. 2018, 4, eaat0098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Mitala, J.J.; Michael, A.C. Improving the Performance of Electrochemical Microsensors Based on Enzymes Entrapped in a Redox Hydrogel. Anal. Chim. Acta 2006, 556, 326–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, J.; Wu, Z.; Han, S.; Yang, B.-R.; Gui, X.; Tao, K.; Liu, C.; Miao, J.; Norford, L.K. Extremely Deformable, Transparent, and High-Performance Gas Sensor Based on Ionic Conductive Hydrogel. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 2364–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Zhang, J.; Xue, W.; Dai, Y.; Wu, L.; Liao, B.; Zeng, W.; Tao, X. Double Network Hydrogel Sensors with High Sensitivity in Large Strain Range. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2021, 306, 2100486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, Z.; Shi, W.; Yan, K.; Pan, L.; Yu, G. Doping Engineering of Conductive Polymer Hydrogels and Their Application in Advanced Sensor Technologies. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 6232–6244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, Z.; Yang, X.; Wu, J. Conductive Hydrogel- and Organohydrogel-Based Stretchable Sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 2128–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wu, J.; Tao, K.; Zhang, J.; Guo, Y.; Miao, J.; Norford, L.K. Chemically Functionalized 3D Graphene Hydrogel for High Performance Gas Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 8130–8140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rahmani, P.; Shojaei, A. A Review on the Features, Performance and Potential Applications of Hydrogel-Based Wearable Strain/Pressure Sensors. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 298, 102553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Binder, S.; Gerlach, G. Intramolecular Force-Compensated Hydrogel-Based Sensors with Reduced Response Times. TM—Tech. Mess. 2019, 86, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Binder, S.; Gerlach, G. Performance of Force-Compensated Chemical Sensors Based on Bisensitive Hydrogels. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2021, 342, 129420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Binder, S.; Gerlach, G. Funktionsprinzip und Anwendung der Kraftkompensationsmessmethode für miniaturisierte hydrogelbasierte Sensoren. TM—Tech. Mess. 2022, 89, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lee, J.; Le, Q.T.; Lee, D.; Nam, S.; Nguyen, T.H.; Song, Y.; Sung, J.; Son, S.-W.; Kim, J. Micropyramidal Flexible Ion Gel Sensor for Multianalyte Discrimination and Strain Compensation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2023, 15, 26138–26147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wu, Z.; Shi, W.; Ding, H.; Zhong, B.; Huang, W.; Zhou, Y.; Gui, X.; Xie, X.; Wu, J. Ultrastable, Stretchable, Highly Conductive and Transparent Hydrogels Enabled by Salt-Percolation for High-Performance Temperature and Strain Sensing. J. Mater. Chem. C 2021, 9, 13668–13679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mo, F.; Chen, Z.; Liang, G.; Wang, D.; Zhao, Y.; Li, H.; Dong, B.; Zhi, C. Zwitterionic Sulfobetaine Hydrogel Electrolyte Building Separated Positive/Negative Ion Migration Channels for Aqueous Zn-MnO 2 Batteries with Superior Rate Capabilities. Adv. Energy Mater. 2020, 10, 2000035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhu, K.; Luo, J.; Zhang, D.; Wang, N.; Pan, S.; Zhou, S.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, G.; Yang, P.; Fan, Y.; et al. Molecular Engineering Enables Hydrogel Electrolyte with Ionic Hopping Migration and Self-Healability toward Dendrite-Free Zinc-Metal Anodes. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2311082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tian, C.; Wang, J.; Sun, R.; Ali, T.; Wang, H.; Xie, B.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, Y. Improved Interfacial Ion Migration and Deposition through the Chain-Liquid Synergistic Effect by a Carboxylated Hydrogel Electrolyte for Stable Zinc Metal Anodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202310970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Tang, Q.; Sun, X.; Li, Q.; Wu, J.; Lin, J. Fabrication of a High-Strength Hydrogel with an Interpenetrating Network Structure. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2009, 346, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Butylina, S.; Geng, S.; Oksman, K. Properties of As-Prepared and Freeze-Dried Hydrogels Made from Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) and Cellulose Nanocrystals Using Freeze-Thaw Technique. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 81, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liang, Y.; Xue, J.; Du, B.; Nie, J. Ultrastiff, Tough, and Healable Ionic–Hydrogen Bond Cross-Linked Hydrogels and Their Uses as Building Blocks To Construct Complex Hydrogel Structures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 5441–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Wu, X.; Xie, Y.; Xue, C.; Chen, K.; Yang, X.; Xu, L.; Qi, J.; Zhang, D. Preparation of PVA-GO Composite Hydrogel and Effect of Ionic Coordination on Its Properties. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 075306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Li, Y.; Hu, C.; Lan, J.; Yan, B.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, L.; Ran, R. Hydrogel-Based Temperature Sensor with Water Retention, Frost Resistance and Remoldability. Polymer 2020, 186, 122027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nam, C.; Zimudzi, T.J.; Geise, G.M.; Hickner, M.A. Increased Hydrogel Swelling Induced by Absorption of Small Molecules. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 14263–14270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Zou, J.; Jing, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, S.; Hu, X.; Feng, P.; Liu, Y. Multifunctional Organohydrogel with Ultralow-Hysteresis, Ultrafast-Response, and Whole-Strain-Range Linearity for Self-Powered Sensors. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zeng, S.; Zhang, J.; Zu, G.; Huang, J. Transparent, Flexible, and Multifunctional Starch-Based Double-Network Hydrogels as High-Performance Wearable Electronics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 267, 118198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yamada, T.; Hayamizu, Y.; Yamamoto, Y.; Yomogida, Y.; Izadi-Najafabadi, A.; Futaba, D.N.; Hata, K. A Stretchable Carbon Nanotube Strain Sensor for Human-Motion Detection. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2011, 6, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zou, Q.; Zhang, S.; Su, Q.; Xue, T.; Lan, K. Flexible Multimodal Sensor Based on Double-network Hydrogel for Human and Robotic Applications. ChemistrySelect 2023, 8, e202204319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Xu, L.; Chen, Y.; Guo, Z.; Tang, Z.; Luo, Y.; Xie, S.; Li, N.; Xu, J. Flexible Li+/Agar/pHEAA Double-Network Conductive Hydrogels with Self-Adhesive and Self-Repairing Properties as Strain Sensors for Human Motion Monitoring. React. Funct. Polym. 2021, 168, 105054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sui, X.; Guo, H.; Cai, C.; Li, Q.; Wen, C.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Yang, J.; Zhang, L. Ionic Conductive Hydrogels with Long-Lasting Antifreezing, Water Retention and Self-Regeneration Abilities. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 419, 129478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tang, L.; Wu, S.; Li, Y.; Jiang, K.; Xu, Y.; Dai, B.; Wang, W.; Tang, J.; Gong, L. A Super-Tough Ionic Conductive Hydrogel with Anti-Freezing, Water Retention, and Self-Regenerated Properties for Self-Powered Flexible Sensor. Appl. Mater. Today 2023, 32, 101820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhang, S.D.; Zhai, Y.C.; Zhang, Z.F. Preparation and Properties of Polyvinyl Alcohol (PVA)/Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP) Hydrogel. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2011, 84–85, 485–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hou, K.; Nie, Y.; Tendo Mugaanire, I.; Guo, Y.; Zhu, M. A Novel Leaf Inspired Hydrogel Film Based on Fiber Reinforcement as Rapid Steam Sensor. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 382, 122948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Qin, Z.; Sun, X.; Yu, Q.; Zhang, H.; Wu, X.; Yao, M.; Liu, W.; Yao, F.; Li, J. Carbon Nanotubes/Hydrophobically Associated Hydrogels as Ultrastretchable, Highly Sensitive, Stable Strain, and Pressure Sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 4944–4953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, H.; Wang, X.; Cao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Ma, Z.; Wang, J.; Wang, W.; Wu, D. Freezing-Tolerant, Highly Sensitive Strain and Pressure Sensors Assembled from Ionic Conductive Hydrogels with Dynamic Cross-Links. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 25334–25344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Agmon, N. Isoelectronic Theory for Cationic Radii. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 15068–15073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Bouchaala, A.; Jaber, N.; Yassine, O.; Shekhah, O.; Chernikova, V.; Eddaoudi, M.; Younis, M.I. Nonlinear-Based MEMS Sensors and Active Switches for Gas Detection. Sensors 2016, 16, 758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Bandari, N.; Dargahi, J.; Packirisamy, M. Miniaturized Optical Force Sensor for Minimally Invasive Surgery with Learning-Based Nonlinear Calibration. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 20, 3579–3592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lewis, G.; Merken, P.; Vandewal, M. Enhanced Accuracy of CMOS Smart Temperature Sensors by Nonlinear Curvature Correction. Sensors 2018, 18, 4087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Berges, J.A.; Franklin, D.J.; Harrison, P.J. Evolution of an artificial seawater medium: Improvements in enriched seawater, artificial water over the last two decades. J. Phycol. 2001, 37, 1138–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The fabrication process of DN-SPEZ hydrogel and the internal double-network cross-linking form.
Figure 1. The fabrication process of DN-SPEZ hydrogel and the internal double-network cross-linking form.
Sensors 24 03232 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of DN-SPEZ hydrogels at different magnifications: (a) magnification 7000; (b) magnification 15,000.
Figure 2. SEM images of DN-SPEZ hydrogels at different magnifications: (a) magnification 7000; (b) magnification 15,000.
Sensors 24 03232 g002
Figure 3. The implementation scheme of the self-delivery quasi-compensation mechanism: (a) Hydrogel freeze–thaw molding mold; (b) perspective view of a hydrogel injected with compensation solution; (c) schematic view of hydrogel injected with compensation solution; (d) hydrogel cross-section; (e) hydrogel profile; (f) profile after hydrogel compensation.
Figure 3. The implementation scheme of the self-delivery quasi-compensation mechanism: (a) Hydrogel freeze–thaw molding mold; (b) perspective view of a hydrogel injected with compensation solution; (c) schematic view of hydrogel injected with compensation solution; (d) hydrogel cross-section; (e) hydrogel profile; (f) profile after hydrogel compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g003
Figure 4. DN-SPEZ hydrogel mechanical properties: (a) tensile curves of hydrogels with different formulations; (b) corresponding maximum tensile stress; (c) compression curves of hydrogels with different formulations; (d) corresponding maximum compressive stress.
Figure 4. DN-SPEZ hydrogel mechanical properties: (a) tensile curves of hydrogels with different formulations; (b) corresponding maximum tensile stress; (c) compression curves of hydrogels with different formulations; (d) corresponding maximum compressive stress.
Sensors 24 03232 g004
Figure 5. (ac) DN-SPEZ hydrogel states at different time; (d) weightlifting; (e,f) stretching; (g) DN-SPEZ hydrogel post-twist stretching.
Figure 5. (ac) DN-SPEZ hydrogel states at different time; (d) weightlifting; (e,f) stretching; (g) DN-SPEZ hydrogel post-twist stretching.
Sensors 24 03232 g005
Figure 6. (a) PVA/SA hydrogel temperature-sensitive properties; (b) DN-SPEZ hydrogel temperature-sensitive properties; (c) stability of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in the range of 25 °C–60 °C for 10 cycles; (d) stability of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in the range of −20 °C to 25 °C for 10 cycles; (e) water retention of PVA/SA hydrogel vs. DN-SPEZ hydrogel with different EG contents; (f) dissolution rate of PVA/SA hydrogels vs. DN-SPEZ hydrogels with different EG contents.
Figure 6. (a) PVA/SA hydrogel temperature-sensitive properties; (b) DN-SPEZ hydrogel temperature-sensitive properties; (c) stability of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in the range of 25 °C–60 °C for 10 cycles; (d) stability of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in the range of −20 °C to 25 °C for 10 cycles; (e) water retention of PVA/SA hydrogel vs. DN-SPEZ hydrogel with different EG contents; (f) dissolution rate of PVA/SA hydrogels vs. DN-SPEZ hydrogels with different EG contents.
Sensors 24 03232 g006
Figure 7. Pressure sensitivity and strain sensitivity: (a) relationship between resistance change and pressure; (b) relationship between resistance changes and tensile stresses.
Figure 7. Pressure sensitivity and strain sensitivity: (a) relationship between resistance change and pressure; (b) relationship between resistance changes and tensile stresses.
Sensors 24 03232 g007
Figure 8. (a) Resistance drift of hydrogel in energized circuit after compensation of uncompensated group, LiCl, NaCl, and KCl; (b) partial enlargement of Figure 8a; (c) trend of the difference between the hydrogel resistance drift curves of the uncompensated group and the LiCl, NaCl, and KCl compensation; (d) resistance drift of hydrogel in energized circuit after compensation of uncompensated group, NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3; (e) partial enlargement of Figure 8d; (f) trend of the difference between the hydrogel resistance drift curves of the uncompensated group and the NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 compensation.
Figure 8. (a) Resistance drift of hydrogel in energized circuit after compensation of uncompensated group, LiCl, NaCl, and KCl; (b) partial enlargement of Figure 8a; (c) trend of the difference between the hydrogel resistance drift curves of the uncompensated group and the LiCl, NaCl, and KCl compensation; (d) resistance drift of hydrogel in energized circuit after compensation of uncompensated group, NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3; (e) partial enlargement of Figure 8d; (f) trend of the difference between the hydrogel resistance drift curves of the uncompensated group and the NaCl, MgCl2, and AlCl3 compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g008
Figure 9. Resistance change in cycling test at 200 kPa pressure: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation.
Figure 9. Resistance change in cycling test at 200 kPa pressure: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g009
Figure 10. Resistance change in cycling test at 200 kPa pressure: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) NaCl compensation; (c) MgCl2 compensation; (d) AlCl3 compensation.
Figure 10. Resistance change in cycling test at 200 kPa pressure: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) NaCl compensation; (c) MgCl2 compensation; (d) AlCl3 compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g010
Figure 11. Stability fit curve of DN-SPEZ hydrogel for pressure testing in air: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation; (e) MgCl2 compensation; (f) AlCl3 compensation.
Figure 11. Stability fit curve of DN-SPEZ hydrogel for pressure testing in air: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation; (e) MgCl2 compensation; (f) AlCl3 compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g011
Figure 12. Pressure testing of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in seawater and corresponding stability fitting curves: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation; (e) MgCl2 compensation; (f) AlCl3 compensation.
Figure 12. Pressure testing of DN-SPEZ hydrogel in seawater and corresponding stability fitting curves: (a) uncompensated experimental; (b) LiCl compensation; (c) NaCl compensation; (d) KCl compensation; (e) MgCl2 compensation; (f) AlCl3 compensation.
Sensors 24 03232 g012
Figure 13. Compensation effect of different concentrations of LiCl compensation solutions: (a) compensation in air; (b) compensation in seawater.
Figure 13. Compensation effect of different concentrations of LiCl compensation solutions: (a) compensation in air; (b) compensation in seawater.
Sensors 24 03232 g013
Figure 14. Multi-scenario application testing of DN-SPEZ hydrogel after self-calibration compensation with LiCl. (a,b) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for Morse code recognition in seawater environments; (c) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring swallowing movements; (d,e) DN-SPEZ hydrogel attached to robotic arm for sandbag and ball press tests; (f) DN-SPEZ hydrogel presses against small balls in seawater; (g) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring wrist flexion; (h) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring finger flexion in seawater; (i) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring finger flexion of different amplitudes.
Figure 14. Multi-scenario application testing of DN-SPEZ hydrogel after self-calibration compensation with LiCl. (a,b) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for Morse code recognition in seawater environments; (c) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring swallowing movements; (d,e) DN-SPEZ hydrogel attached to robotic arm for sandbag and ball press tests; (f) DN-SPEZ hydrogel presses against small balls in seawater; (g) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring wrist flexion; (h) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring finger flexion in seawater; (i) DN-SPEZ hydrogel for monitoring finger flexion of different amplitudes.
Sensors 24 03232 g014
Figure 15. Modeling the polar migration of metal cations within hydrogels in compensating solutions—an example of network structures formed in sodium alginate with Zn2+.
Figure 15. Modeling the polar migration of metal cations within hydrogels in compensating solutions—an example of network structures formed in sodium alginate with Zn2+.
Sensors 24 03232 g015
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, Z.; Yin, Y.; Liu, B.; Xue, T.; Zou, Q. Amphibious Multifunctional Hydrogel Flexible Haptic Sensor with Self-Compensation Mechanism. Sensors 2024, 24, 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103232

AMA Style

Sun Z, Yin Y, Liu B, Xue T, Zou Q. Amphibious Multifunctional Hydrogel Flexible Haptic Sensor with Self-Compensation Mechanism. Sensors. 2024; 24(10):3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Zhenhao, Yunjiang Yin, Baoguo Liu, Tao Xue, and Qiang Zou. 2024. "Amphibious Multifunctional Hydrogel Flexible Haptic Sensor with Self-Compensation Mechanism" Sensors 24, no. 10: 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103232

APA Style

Sun, Z., Yin, Y., Liu, B., Xue, T., & Zou, Q. (2024). Amphibious Multifunctional Hydrogel Flexible Haptic Sensor with Self-Compensation Mechanism. Sensors, 24(10), 3232. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24103232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop