Next Article in Journal
Biomechanical Investigation of Lower Limbs during Slope Transformation Running with Different Longitudinal Bending Stiffness Shoes
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Autonomous Vehicle Path Planning Algorithm Based on Improved RRT* Algorithm and Artificial Potential Field Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analytical Formalism for Data Representation and Object Detection with 2D LiDAR: Application in Mobile Robotics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Smart Robotics for Automation

by
Felipe N. Martins
Sensors and Smart Systems Group, Institute of Engineering, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747 AS Groningen, The Netherlands
Sensors 2024, 24(12), 3900; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123900
Submission received: 27 April 2024 / Accepted: 30 May 2024 / Published: 16 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Smart Robotics for Automation)
In recent years, the demand for efficient automation across various sectors has accelerated significantly. E-commerce, for instance, has undergone rapid global expansion, particularly since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Smart robots offer potential solutions to cope with this surge in demand by enhancing warehouse efficiency. Moreover, robots can address various pressing issues stemming from diverse factors. The phenomenon of aging populations [2] signifies an increasing need for assistance among a larger demographic, while simultaneously leading to a decline in the available workforce. Aging populations present a spectrum of challenges, ranging from maintaining individual independence [3] to addressing the rising incidence of vision loss [4], which exerts significant strain on healthcare systems [5]. Climate change is already impacting food production [6,7] and is poised to exacerbate challenges leading to the displacement of entire populations [8], thereby precipitating a surge in demand for global infrastructure projects. These challenges underscore the critical need for innovative solutions in robotics, automation, and sensor systems.
In response to these pressing issues, the collection “Smart Robotics for Automation” in Sensors explores cutting-edge research and developments in the field, with a particular focus on related sensory aspects. The fifteen articles featured in this collection span a diverse array of applications, each contributing to the advancement of specific domains.
In the realm of industrial automation and robotics, several papers offer novel solutions for enhancing efficiency and safety in manufacturing and logistics. From humanoid motion control algorithms to collision detection methods for collaborative robots, these contributions address the key challenges faced by industries seeking to automate their processes. Focusing on robot motor control, Arciuolo et al. introduce a novel proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller algorithm called PID++, which applies minor adjustments based on the real-time encoder position input to achieve a stable, precise, adaptive control system for linear motion control, regardless of load (contribution 1). This computationally lightweight approach boasts adaptability and precision, making it suitable for a wide array of applications, from industrial to biomedical settings. In turn, Li et al. argue that accurate real-time identification is essential for servo controller design, and propose an intelligent parameter identification method for robot servo controllers, enhancing dynamic performance and stability (contribution 4). Using advanced integration and optimization techniques, their approach enables accurate real-time identification of critical controller parameters.
Considering robot control, Czubenko et al. present a collision detection solution for collaborative robots (cobots) using a simple neural network architecture (contribution 6). The authors argue that a virtual sensor based on such a network can be used to detect various types of collisions of cobots or other mobile or stationary systems, improving the safety of human–machine interactions without the need for expensive equipment. Jung et al. present a hybrid imitation learning framework that combines behavior cloning and state cloning methods to enhance the robotic manipulation task learning efficiency (contribution 2). Their approach outperforms traditional methods, offering faster training times and improved performance in tasks such as pick-up, pick-and-place, and stacking tasks. Mandischer et al. introduce consumer-centered item detection methods for industrial environments, emphasizing usability and efficiency (contribution 7). They focus on unsupervised segmentation coupled with machine learning methods for classification, presenting the full pipeline from calibration and segmentation to item classification in the industrial context. Their approach, leveraging multicamera networks, offers reliable item detection and classification even at considerable ranges, improving efficiency in logistics and manufacturing. Regarding automation, Kilikevivcius et al. investigate vibrational transportation methods using dynamic dry friction control, unveiling novel capabilities for object transportation (contribution 8). Their research offers practical solutions for handling and transportation tasks in manufacturing and logistics, enhancing productivity and flexibility.
Other articles address problems related to mobile robots. Nascimento et al. tackle the challenge of safe path planning by proposing algorithms based on Probabilistic Foam that are able to find short paths or high-clearance paths (contribution 3). The authors present simulation studies to analyze the behavior, performance, and safety aspects of the proposed methods. Regarding robot navigation, Fagundes et al. propose an analytical formalism for object detection using 2D LiDAR sensors (contribution 15). Their research facilitates object detection and object localization in mobile robotics applications, offering a standardized approach for data representation using 2D LiDARs. Finally, robot localization is addressed by Klein et al., who present a machine learning approach to robot localization based on computer vision (contribution 14). They show the effectiveness of their solution in a competition scenario, paving the way for AI-driven localization in industrial environments.
Environmental sensing using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is addressed by two articles. Tanveer et al. explore the use of biosonar echoes for environment estimation in UAVs (contribution 5). Their simulation study demonstrates the effectiveness of biosonar-based techniques in accurately assessing foliage distributions, crucial for safe navigation in challenging outdoor environments. Zhou et al. address air quality monitoring challenges with fixed-wing UAVs, offering improved coverage and endurance compared to rotary vehicles (contribution 13). They present the development of a 3D coverage path planning method that enhances the spatial and temporal resolution for urban air quality profiling, aiding in environmental monitoring efforts.
In the domain of agriculture and aquaculture, some articles present robotic systems tailored for tasks such as vineyard surveillance and aquaculture inspection. Kapetanovic et al. present a heterogeneous autonomous robotic system tailored for viticulture and mariculture applications (contribution 11). In viticulture, they apply an all-terrain mobile manipulator and an autonomous aerial robot that can be used in very steep vineyards, where other mechanization fails. In mariculture, they also apply an autonomous surface vehicle and a remotely operated underwater vehicle. Their integrated approach can improve the efficiency of agricultural practices and reduce the amount of labor-intensive tasks such as vineyard surveillance, spraying, and aquaculture net pen monitoring. For aquaculture, Akram et al. present the integration of remotely operated vehicles with visual servoing for inspection of net pens (contribution 12). They propose a vision-based positioning system composed of an object detector, a pose generator, and a closed-loop controller. Their system offers a low-cost and efficient solution for monitoring underwater structures, ensuring the health and stability of fish farms.
Two articles highlight the capabilities of humanoid robots in sporting activities and human–robot interaction scenarios. Park et al. showcase the prowess of humanoid robots in sporting activities, particularly in skiing competitions (contribution 9). Their work highlights advancements in vision recognition and control, enabling humanoid robots to navigate challenging terrains autonomously. Gong et al. present a human–robot interaction method for real-time motion imitation focusing on a Tri-Co Robot (coexisting–cooperative–cognitive robot), facilitating natural and intuitive robot control (contribution 10). They use a motion capture system, which captures human motion and links it with a simplified skeleton model. Their dynamic time warping model enables precise motion evaluation, enhancing robot adaptability in diverse environments.
In conclusion, the papers featured in this collection represent a diverse array of innovative approaches and solutions to challenges in robotics and automation. The articles show that we can address pressing societal issues by harnessing the power of smart robotics and sensor technologies. We extend our gratitude to the authors for their contributions and hope that this collection will inspire further advancements in the field of sensors for robotics and automation.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the use of the large language model (LLM) ChatGPT-3.5, from OpenAI. The LLM was used to re-write text originally written by the author to improve the level of English in several parts of this text, with no change in content.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

List of Contributions

  • Arciuolo, T.F.; Faezipour, M. PID++: A Computationally Lightweight Humanoid Motion Control Algorithm. Sensors 2021, 21, 456. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21020456.
  • Jung, E.; Kim, I. Hybrid Imitation Learning Framework for Robotic Manipulation Tasks. Sensors 2021, 21, 3409. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21103409.
  • Nascimento, L.B.P.; Barrios-Aranibar, D.; Santos, V.G.; Pereira, D.S.; Ribeiro, W.C.; Alsina, P.J. Safe Path Planning Algorithms for Mobile Robots Based on Probabilistic Foam. Sensors 2021, 21, 4156. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124156.
  • Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Zhou, S.; Wang, X. Intelligent Parameter Identification for Robot Servo Controller Based on Improved Integration Method. Sensors 2021, 21, 4177. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124177.
  • Tanveer, M.H.; Thomas, A.; Ahmed, W.; Zhu, H. Estimate the Unknown Environment with Biosonar Echoes—A Simulation Study. Sensors 2021, 21, 4186. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124186.
  • Czubenko, M.; Kowalczuk, Z. A Simple Neural Network for Collision Detection of Collaborative Robots. Sensors 2021, 21, 4235. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21124235.
  • Mandischer, N.; Huhn, T.; Hüsing, M.; Corves, B. Efficient and Consumer-Centered Item Detection and Classification with a Multicamera Network at High Ranges. Sensors 2021, 21, 4818. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144818.
  • Kilikevičius, S.; Fedaravičius, A. Vibrational Transportation on a Platform Subjected to Sinusoidal Displacement Cycles Employing Dry Friction Control. Sensors 2021, 21, 7280. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217280.
  • Park, C.; Kim, B.; Kim, Y.; Eum, Y.; Song, H.; Yoon, D.; Moon, J.; Han, J. Carved Turn Control with Gate Vision Recognition of a Humanoid Robot for Giant Slalom Skiing on Ski Slopes. Sensors 2022, 22, 816. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22030816.
  • Gong, L.; Chen, B.; Xu, W.; Liu, C.; Li, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhao, L. Motion Similarity Evaluation between Human and a Tri-Co Robot during Real-Time Imitation with a Trajectory Dynamic Time Warping Model. Sensors 2022, 22, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22051968.
  • Kapetanović, N.; Goričanec, J.; Vatavuk, I.; Hrabar, I.; Stuhne, D.; Vasiljević, G.; Kovačić, Z.; Mišković, N.; Antolović, N.; Anić, M.; et al. Heterogeneous Autonomous Robotic System in Viticulture and Mariculture: Vehicles Development and Systems Integration. Sensors 2022, 22, 2961. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22082961.
  • Akram, W.; Casavola, A.; Kapetanović, N.; Miškovic, N. A Visual Servoing Scheme for Autonomous Aquaculture Net Pens Inspection Using ROV. Sensors 2022, 22, 3525. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093525.
  • Zhou, Q.; Lo, L.-Y.; Jiang, B.; Chang, C.-W.; Wen, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-K.; Zhou, W. Development of Fixed-Wing UAV 3D Coverage Paths for Urban Air Quality Profiling. Sensors 2022, 22, 3630. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22103630.
  • Klein, L.C.; Braun, J.; Mendes, J.; Pinto, V.H.; Martins, F.N.; de Oliveira, A.S.; Wörtche, H.; Costa, P.; Lima, J. A Machine Learning Approach to Robot Localization Using Fiducial Markers in RobotAtFactory 4.0 Competition. Sensors 2023, 23, 3128. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23063128.
  • Fagundes, L.A., Jr.; Caldeira, A.G.; Quemelli, M.B.; Martins, F.N.; Brandão, A.S. Analytical Formalism for Data Representation and Object Detection with 2D LiDAR: Application in Mobile Robotics. Sensors 2024, 24, 2284. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24072284.

References

  1. Kahalimoghadam, M.; Thompson, R.G.; Rajabifard, A. Determining the number and location of micro-consolidation centres as a solution to growing e-commerce demand. J. Transp. Geogr. 2024, 117, 103875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Rudnicka, E.; Napierała, P.; Podfigurna, A.; Męczekalski, B.; Smolarczyk, R.; Grymowicz, M. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy ageing. Maturitas 2020, 139, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Mann, W.C. The aging population and its needs. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2004, 3, 12–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, J.; Zhu, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Huang, S.; Xie, R.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, G.; Luo, R.; et al. Global impact of population aging on vision loss prevalence: A population-based study. Glob. Transitions 2024, 6, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Haward, V. Impact of Japan’s Aging Population on Healthcare Costs and the Long-Term Care Insurance System. Stud. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2024, 3, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ray, D.K.; West, P.C.; Clark, M.; Gerber, J.S.; Prishchepov, A.V.; Chatterjee, S. Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0217148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Leal Filho, W.; Setti, A.F.F.; Azeiteiro, U.M.; Lokupitiya, E.; Donkor, F.K.; Etim, N.N.; Matandirotya, N.; Olooto, F.M.; Sharifi, A.; Nagy, G.J.; et al. An overview of the interactions between food production and climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 838, 156438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. McMichael, C. Climate change and migration: Food insecurity as a driver and outcome of climate change-related migration. In Environmental Deterioration and Human Health: Natural and Anthropogenic Determinants; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 291–313. [Google Scholar]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins, F.N. Smart Robotics for Automation. Sensors 2024, 24, 3900. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123900

AMA Style

Martins FN. Smart Robotics for Automation. Sensors. 2024; 24(12):3900. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123900

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins, Felipe N. 2024. "Smart Robotics for Automation" Sensors 24, no. 12: 3900. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24123900

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop