Next Article in Journal
Design of Anti-Eccentric Load Sensor for Engineering Operation Early Warning Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of a Structured Light Scanner for 3D Facial Imaging: A Comparative Study with Direct Anthropometry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Wideband Circular Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for Implantable Blood Glucose Detection System Applications

The School of Electrical Engineering, Xinjiang University, Huarui Street 777#, Shuimogou District, Urumqi 830047, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(16), 5292; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165292
Submission received: 17 July 2024 / Revised: 10 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 15 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)

Abstract

:
To address the current demands for antenna miniaturization, ultra-bandwidth, and circular polarization in advanced medical devices, a novel ISM band implantable antenna for blood glucose monitoring has been developed. This antenna achieves miniaturization by incorporating slots in the radiation patch and adding symmetric short-circuit probes, resulting in a compact size of only 0.054λ0 × 0.054λ0 × 0.005λ00 is the wavelength in free space in respect of the lowest working frequency). By combining two resonance points and utilizing a differential feed structure, the antenna achieves ultra-broadband and circular polarization. Simulations indicate a |S11| bandwidth of 1.1 GHz (1.65–2.75 GHz) and an effective axial ratio (based on 3 dB axis ratio) bandwidth of 590 MHz (1.89–2.48 GHz), able to cover both the ISM frequency band (2.45 GHz) and the mid-field frequency band (1.9 GHz). The antenna exhibits CP gains of −20.04 dBi at a frequency of 2.45 GHz, while it shows gains of −24.64 dBi at 1.9 GHz. Furthermore, a superstrate layer on the antenna’s radiating surface enhances its biocompatibility and minimizes its impact on the human body. Simulation and experimental results indicate that the antenna can establish a stable wireless communication link for implantable continuous blood glucose monitoring systems.

1. Introduction

With ageing and sub-health numbers rising, the demand for medical and healthcare services has also risen. As the traditional medical model makes it challenging to meet the growing demand for healthcare, wireless biomedical technology has emerged, providing a new direction for implantable electronic devices. These devices can break through the limitations of traditional medical treatment and provide more effective health protection [1].
Currently, complex implantable medical system devices have the advantage of uninterrupted monitoring of health data, predicting diseases and repairing human body functions compared with traditional medical devices. For example, implantable blood glucose monitoring instruments can detect real-time changes in blood glucose levels; cardiac pacemakers are used to treat cardiac dysfunctions such as arrhythmia [2]; and capsule endoscopy is used to take pictures by swallowing it into the digestive tract and transmitting the images outside of the body to determine the site and cause of a lesion [3,4,5,6,7,8]. However, the human body is a complex and diverse environment, which places high demands on the miniaturization and signal stability of implantable antennas. Large antennas can cause discomfort, so the design of miniaturized, wide bandwidth, and stable signal implantable antennas has become a hotspot in current research [9,10].
In [11], loading stacked parasitic loops and positioning metal plates on the reflector plate were used to expand the current path, thus designing a small antenna with a widened impedance bandwidth and a volume of 85 mm3. In [12], by incorporating metamaterial units, the researchers successfully miniaturized the antenna to a volume of 7.04 mm3. Therefore, these studies have effectively reduced the antenna size. However, since it is not a circular polarized (CP) antenna, further investigation into the stability of antenna signals is necessary. In [13], the authors designed a dual inductance CP microstrip patch antenna with a double coupled line, and achieved an axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 0.33%. In [14], a novel single-fed CP microstrip antenna was designed, which produces an axial ratio bandwidth (ARBW) of 1.3% at 1.9 GHz. In [15], a CP filter patch antenna was proposed using a dispersion delay line (DDL), achieving a 3.8% 3 dB ARBW at 2.4 GHz. The aforementioned studies on circular polarization have led to significant improvements in signal reception, but the antennas’ axial ratio bandwidth remains suboptimal. In [16], the antenna has a size of 257 mm3 and achieves CP through orthogonal feeding elements. It operates at 2.4 GHz and 5.8 GHz and demonstrates UWB characteristics. In [17], the authors used four L-shaped slots and two orthogonal rectangular slots on the radiating surface to achieve a wide bandwidth, including S11 and AR from 2.3 to 2.8 GHz and 2.3 to 2.6 GHz, respectively. The antenna volume was 63.83 mm3. The aforementioned research on wide bandwidth has significantly expanded the antenna’s frequency range, yet there is still potential for further reductions in the antenna volume.
To take into account the miniaturization, circular polarization, and wide bandwidth of antennas for complex medical system devices, this paper proposes an UWB implantable CP patch antenna designed for blood glucose monitoring, with the antenna resonant frequency in the 2.45 GHz frequency band. By using a high dielectric constant material and the slotting method, we successfully miniaturized the antenna, and realized the UWB characteristics of the antenna by combining multiple resonance points through the slotting, as well as adopting a differential-feeding structure and a pair of symmetrical short-circuiting probes to realize circular polarized antenna performance whilst maintaining miniaturization and UWB.

2. Design Methodology

2.1. Antenna Configurations

The antenna’s structure was very simple. From its top to bottom, there is a superstrate layer, a radiation patch, a dielectric substrate, and a ground plane, as shown in Figure 1c. The detailed geometric variables and their sizes are listed in Table 1. The radial plane has an inside-out annular groove and three notched annular grooves. There is a combination groove in the ground plane, which consists of three horizontal rectangular grooves and one vertical rectangular groove, which significantly reduces the antenna size, increases the bandwidth, and enables frequency tuning. The dielectric substrate is made of Rogers 6010 with a profile of 0.254 mm. Since the fabrication process of the selected board is not within the scope of this paper, this is not elaborated in detail. The antenna is fed by two ports with an inner diameter of 0.25 mm and the feed position is optimized for best impedance matching and broadband performance. To prevent direct contact with human tissue, a superstrate layer is added. This layer is made of Rogers 6006 material, which has a relative permittivity (εr) of 6.15. The antenna is optimized to superstrate the 2.4–2.48 GHz band and is compact with dimensions of 0.054λ0 × 0.054λ0 × 0.005λ0.
In the simulation, we used a single-layer human skin tissue to simulate the actual application environment of the antenna, and its size was 89.8 × 89.8 × 26.27 mm3r = 38, σ = 1.44 S/m, tanδ = 0.283). Figure 2 illustrates the complex medical system integration device. Direct contact between the antenna and the human tissue impacts antenna performance. During the simulation, the battery was set as a perfect electrical conductor (PEC), while all other circuit components were set as Rogers RT/duroid 3010, and the dimensions of the different components in Figure 2 are the sensor set ( π × 3 mm × 2.6 mm), the PCB unit (12 mm × 10 mm × 0.5 mm), and the battery (5 mm × 10 mm × 2.7 mm). Figure 3a compares the antenna’s reflection coefficient (|S11|) versus frequency curves before and after adding a superstrate layer. The simulation results clearly demonstrate that the antenna’s performance significantly improves with the addition of the dielectric superstrate layer, enhancing the bandwidth and fully meeting the requirements of the ISM band. The reason is that the introduction of the superstrate layer not only reduces the fringing effect of the antenna, but also enhances the matching performance, restricts the unintended radiations, and strengthens the adaptability to the environmental change and thus the |S11| parameters achieve the desired effect. Since, when loading the antenna with a superstrate layer, a small gap between the antenna superstrate layer and the radiating patch is inevitable because of manual operation, the variation in the antenna’s |S11| with the gap between the superstrate layer and the radiating patch is further shown in Figure 3b, which shows that the antenna’s |S11| also fluctuates slightly with the increase in the gap but the overall situation still superstrates the bandwidth of the desired frequency band. When placing the antenna inside the integrated device, the effect of the components inside the device on the antenna performance needs to be considered, and the benefits or drawbacks of this effect are uncertain and need to be experimentally demonstrated. As shown in Figure 3c, there is a small increase in bandwidth after placing the antenna in the integrated device, indicating that the addition of the integrated device improves the performance of the antenna. In the process of antenna design and optimization, the above factors are fully considered, which plays an essential role in improving the antenna performance and its operating characteristics.

2.2. Antenna Working Principles

Figure 4a illustrates the process of UWB. Figure 4b shows the evolution of the dual-band CP antenna. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the results of each step.
Step 1: A feed port is introduced on top of the radiation patch. As shown in Figure 4a, by introducing two short pins connecting the radiating element of the antenna and the ground plane, the current flow path is changed, and the current flows directly to the ground through the short pins, so that a part of the antenna’s electrical length is ‘collapsed’. This reduces the effective length of the antenna, and realizes the miniaturization of the antenna.
Step 2: A hollow circular ring and a hollow C-shaped open ring have been slotted in the radiation patch. Additionally, a new feeder is introduced. The new structure excites an additional resonance point at 1.5 GHz compared to step 1, as shown in Figure 5a. The axial ratio (AR) of the new structure is also better than that of step 1, as shown in Figure 5b (step 2), indicating that the introduction of differential feeding can be used to obtain the stable 90° phase difference required for circularly polarized radiation by feeding differential signals of equal amplitude and opposite phase through the two ports, which are spatially orthogonal to each other, resulting in circular polarization. The introduction of the slot structure changes the distribution and path of the current on the surface of the antenna, leading to a change in the path of the current at different frequencies, which generates a new TM mode, allowing the antenna to form a resonance at more than one frequency, which is more conducive to the dual-frequency design.
Step 3: Two C-shaped slots and a notched annular slot are introduced on the radiation patch based on step 2, as shown in Figure 4c. This radiating surface structure changes the current path as shown in step 3 in Figure 4a. Thus, the two bands are merged into a single operating band, realizing the UWB of the antenna. Generated 2.10 GHz to 2.94 GHz |S11|, successfully superstrating the ISM band. This is achieved by the bending of the radiating unit’s surface, which extends the effective current path. This adjustment lowers the resonance frequency of the implanted antenna. Additionally, it merges the two resonance points to achieve wide bandwidth characteristics. However, the ARBW is insufficient to superstrate the ISM band.
Step 4: The design of step 3 is further improved using a two-port differential feed to provide a stable 90-degree phase difference, which continues to widen the bandwidth. Additionally, a combination groove is introduced, reducing the antenna’s resonant frequency, shifting the two resonance points of the antenna towards the lower frequencies, thus superstrating the desired band and increasing the ARBW. This allows the antenna to achieve UWB CP radiation characteristics with an effective 3 dB ARBW of 590 MHz (1.89 GHz–2.48 GHz) as shown by the red line in step 4 of Figure 5b. The ARBW is significantly improved. CP is achieved in the 1.9 GHz band. Additionally, CP is also achieved in the 2.45 GHz band.
The mechanism of production CP: Figure 6 illustrates the simulated AR of the optimized antenna. The dual-band CP mechanism can be investigated by studying the current distribution. Figure 7 illustrates the current vector distribution of the antenna in four phases at two operating frequencies, as shown in Figure 5a (red line). The arrows in the Figure 7 indicate the direction of the current vector sums for different phases. The current rotates counterclockwise in these phases, indicating right-handed circular polarization (RHCP), as shown in Figure 8.
In order to analyze the immunity of the antenna impedance detuning to changes in the electromagnetic properties of the surrounding tissue, the antenna matching levels were analyzed in a rectangular model of 89.8 mm × 89.8 mm × 26.27 mm with ε r [ 25 , 60 ] and σ [ 0 , 3 ] at 1.9 GHz and 2.45 GHz [18]. The range includes biological tissues implanted at 1.9 GHz and 2.45 GHz. Figure 9 shows the detuned immunity range of the antenna. It is clear from the figure that the antenna’s |S11|, gain, and axial ratio (based on 3 dB) show good antenna performance in the implanted tissues. Meanwhile, the antenna can still operate normally when small variations in dielectric constant and conductivity occur, confirming the stability of the antenna operation.

2.3. Radiation Patterns, Gain and SAR

Figure 8 shows the RHCP and left-handed circular polarization (LHCP) gain plots of the designed CP antenna at xoy-plane and xoz-plane. In the single-layer human tissue model, the antenna produced a gain value of −20.04 dBi in the ISM band and −24.64 dBi in the mid-field band. The radiation values are measured in the direction towards the outside of the human body. Owing to implantation in human tissue with loss and dispersive properties, negative gain values are achieved. The RHCP radiation, shown in Figure 8, is consistent with the results in Figure 7.
Since the antenna needs to be implanted into human tissue, its radiation will interact with the tissue, so the specific absorption rate (SAR) must be taken into account to ensure human safety. The calculation formula is as follows [19]:
S A R = σ E 2 2 ρ
where E is the electric field strength and ρ is the tissue density.
The simulated 1g-averaged SAR values are 421 W/kg (1W) at 1.9 GHz. At 2.45 GHz, the SAR value is 463 W/kg (1W). To meet the 1999 IEEE standard for 1g-averaged SAR, the input power should not exceed 3.7 mW at 1.9 GHz and 3.4 mW at 2.45 GHz [20,21]. These values indicate that there is no harm to the patient’s body within the permitted input power range. The simulated SARs are depicted in Figure 10.

3. Link Budgets

To ensure the reliable and efficient transmission of physiological data between the device and external devices, the transmission distance is calculated according to Equations (2)–(4) [22]. To ensure safety and stability, the input power must not exceed −46 dBw, taking into account the limits of the European Radio Communications Commission (ERC). The link budget equation is as follows:
L M ( d B ) = C 1 N 0 C 2 N 0
C 1 N 0 = P t + G t + G r L f N 0
C 2 N 0 = E b N 0 + 10 log ( B r ) G c + G d
Figure 11 illustrates the variation in the transmission distance for both frequencies at 100 kbps, the link margins remain robust at 37.74 dB and 35.35 dB for transmissions up to 20 m. However, increasing the bitrate to 1 Mbps reduces the link margins to 27.74 dB and 25.35 dB at the same transmission distance [23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31]. The parameters used in the link budget are tabulated in Table 2.

4. Antenna Tests and Discussion of Results

From the data listed in Table 1, the antenna was processed and the performance of the antenna was verified experimentally. The antenna is tested with two coaxial cables, connected to two excitation source ports, where the ports are set up with a current phase difference of 90° as a means of differentially feeding the antenna. Figure 12 illustrates the antenna prototype and the measurement setup, with |S11| testing performed using a vector network analyzer in minced pork. The size of the container for storing the pork puree is 25 cm × 18 cm × 10 cm, and the implantation depth of the complex implantable blood glucose monitoring system is 4 mm. Figure 13 compares the |S11| results of the antenna in the simulated and measured cases. The red curve represents measured results in minced pork, while the blue curve shows simulation results from software. The impedance bandwidth tested in minced pork environment spans approximately 54.8% (1.63–2.86 GHz). A slight deviation of |S11| from the HFSS simulation is observed, likely attributed to machining tolerances and measurement errors. Despite minor differences, both results encompass the desired ISM band.
Figure 14 shows the AR values in different environments. In the simulated scenario, the 3 dB ARBW spans 0.59 GHz (1.89 GHz–2.48 GHz), while in the minced pork, the measured ARBW is 0.58 GHz (1.9 GHz–2.48 GHz). The experimental results indicate that the discrepancy between simulation and measurement is negligible. Typically, such errors stem from differences between the test and simulation environments, as well as minor variations in antenna manufacturing and operational procedures.
Figure 15 and Figure 16 depict the gain results of the designed antenna in both experimental environments. For clarity, Figure 17 presents the three-dimensional radiation patterns. It should be noted that in both the simulation and the experiment, we conducted research on implantable blood glucose monitoring systems. For the sake of observation, in the simulation process of Figure 17, we have hidden the remaining parts in HFSS and only displayed the antenna part. A comparison is conducted between the antenna’s gain patterns simulated in a standard environment and those measured in the minced pork medium. It is observed that the antenna’s main radiation direction is outward. In the single-layer skin model, peak gains at 2.45 GHz and 1.90 GHz are measured at −20.04 dBi and −24.64 dBi, respectively.
In the minced pork environment, these peak gains shift slightly to −21.33 dBi and −26.07 dBi at the same frequencies. These results indicate a minor decrease in gain across different environments, likely attributed to variations in dielectric constants and other parameters between minced pork and human skin, as well as differences in implantation depth. Nevertheless, the antenna maintains good gain values, meeting the expected performance criteria.
In order to better represent the performance of the designed antenna, at the end of this article, the designed antenna is compared with the antennas in the literature. Table 3 makes a comparison between this paper and the references in terms of tissue properties (dielectric constant and conductivity), shape, and tissue size. Table 4 makes a comparison among this paper and the references in terms of radiation properties and physical characteristics (center frequency, FBW, ARBW, gain, polarization characteristics, and size). From Table 4, the antenna presented in this paper is significantly optimized in terms of size and achieves UWB effective ARBW, whereas the ARBW in Table 4 is calculated based on 3 dB. However, its gain performance is not the highest among the compared antennas.

5. Conclusions

In this paper, a UWB CP implantable patch antenna is designed for blood glucose monitoring in complex medical devices. It is shown that the bandwidth and CP characteristics of the antenna are achieved by differential feeding, introducing short-circuiting probes, and etching two C-shaped slots, a ring slot and a notched ring slot, while combining the multiple resonance points on the backside by opening a combination groove. A satisfactory 3 dB axial bandwidth of 24.1% and an impedance bandwidth of 44.9% are achieved. In addition, the antenna in a real organizational environment confirms that the antenna has better robustness. The link margin and SAR distribution are also evaluated. Finally, the antenna prototype is tested in minced pork to measure its radiation characteristics, and the tested |S11| and CP follow the expected results of the simulation.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.S. and M.L.; methodology, Z.S.; software, M.L.; validation, Z.S. and M.L.; formal analysis, M.L.; investigation, M.L.; resources, Z.S.; data curation, M.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.L.; writing—review and editing, Z.S.; visualization, M.L.; supervision, Z.S.; project administration, Z.S.; funding acquisition, Z.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded in part by the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation General Project, under Grant 2022D01C424; in part by the Tianchi Talent Project in Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, under Grant 510523005137; in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, under Grant 62261052; and in part by the Xinjiang University Youth Doctoral Research Launch Project, under Grant 620321063.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Institute of Micro, Nano, and Radio Frequency at the Hebei University of Technology for providing the experimental equipment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wang, L.; Wang, C.; Zhang, H.; Ma, P.; Zhang, S. Estimation-Correction Modeling and Chaos Control of Fractional-Order Memristor Load Buck-Boost Converter. Complex Syst. Model. Simul. 2024, 4, 67–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Molloy, A.; Beaumont, K.; Alyami, A.; Kirimi, M.; Hoare, D.; Mirzai, N.; Heidari, H.; Mitra, S.; Neale, S.L.; Mercer, J.R. Challenges to the Development of the Next Generation of Self-Reporting Cardiovascular Implantable Medical Devices. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 15, 260–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gopavajhula, S.; Kumar, S.; Narasimhadhan, A.V. Dual-Band Antipodal Vivaldi Antenna for Wireless Neural Monitoring Applications. In Proceedings of the 2020 5th IEEE International Conference on Recent Advances and Innovations in Engineering (ICRAIE), Jaipur, India, 1–3 December 2020; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Yang, F.; Xu, S.; Zhou, H.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L. A Low-Profile Compact Dual-Band L-Shape Monopole Antenna for Microwave Thorax Monitoring. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 448–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nguyen, M.A.; Bien, F.; Byun, G. Design of an Out-Folded Patch Antenna with a Zeroth-Order Resonance for Non-Invasive Continuous Glucose Monitoring. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 8932–8940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kaim, V.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Kumar, S.; Choi, H.C.; Kim, K.W.; Rambabu, K. Electrically Small Circularly Polarized UWB Intraocular Antenna System for Retinal Prosthesis. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2022, 69, 3504–3515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bahrami, S.; Moloudian, G.; Miri-Rostami, S.R.; Björninen, T. Compact Microstrip Antennas with Enhanced Bandwidth for the Implanted and External Subsystems of a Wireless Retinal Prosthesi. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2021, 69, 2969–2974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Woo, T.; Kim, D.; Park, C.Y.; Yoon, Y.J. Compact Wideband Loop Antenna for Earbuds. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 47340–47347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, X.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, W. A Miniaturized Wideband Directional Circularly Polarized Antenna Based on Bent Vivaldi Antenna Structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 298–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Dong, Y. Novel Miniaturized Circularly Polarized Inverted-F Antenna with Planar Configuration. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2024, 23, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, J.; Hao, S.-J.; Cui, Y.-G.; Chen, X. A Miniaturized Wideband Dual-Polarized Planar Antenna Based on Multiresonance. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2022, 21, 242–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Saghanezhad, S.A.H.; Atlasbaf, Z. Miniaturized Dual-Band CPW-Fed Antennas Loaded with U-Shaped Metamaterials. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 658–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhao, Z.; Liu, F.; Ren, J.; Liu, Y.; Yin, Y. Dual-Sense Circularly Polarized Antenna with a Dual-Coupled Line. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 1415–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, C.S.; Fan, Y.; Ezzat, M. Single-Feed Circularly Polarized Microstrip Antenna with Bethe Holes on the Radiating Patch. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2020, 68, 4935–4938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, W.; Chen, C.; Wang, S.; Wu, W. Circularly Polarized Patch Antenna with Filtering Performance Using Polarization Isolation and Dispersive Delay Line. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2020, 19, 1457–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, R.; Guo, Y. A Conformal UWB Dual-Polarized Antenna for Wireless Capsule Endoscope Systems. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, R.; Zhang, K.; Li, Z.; Cui, W.; Liang, W.; Wang, M.; Fan, C.; Zheng, H.; Li, E. A Wideband Circular Polarization Implantable Antenna for Health Monitor Microsystem. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2021, 20, 848–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nikolayev, D.; Zhadobov, M.; Le Coq, L.; Karban, P.; Sauleau, R. Robust Ultraminiature Capsule Antenna for Ingestible and Implantable Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2017, 65, 6107–6119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, X.-Y.; Wu, B.; Zhang, H.H.; Guo, K.X.; Xie, H.Y.; Song, X.Z.; Su, T. Ultrawideband Circularly Polarized Halved-Type Vivaldi Antenna with Symmetrical Radiation Pattern. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2024, 23, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kamel, Y.A.; Mohamed, H.A.; ELsadek, H.; ELhennawy, H.M. Miniaturized Triple-Band Circular- Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for Bio-Telemetry Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 74–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tian, X.; Wang, J.; Zheng, C.; Du, Z. Shared-Radiator Wideband Grounded Patch Antenna Pair with Bending Slot for Mobile Terminals. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2024, 72, 3724–3729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Song, Z.; Xu, X.; Shi, Y.; Wang, L. Design of a Compact Circularly Polarized Implantable Antenna for Capsule Endoscopy Systems. Sensors 2024, 24, 3960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Battistini, G.; Paolini, G.; Costanzo, A.; Masotti, D. A Novel 3-D Printed Dual-Port Rectenna for Simultaneous Energy Harvesting and Backscattering of a Passively Generated UWB Pulse. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2024, 72, 812–821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shah, S.N.; Zada, M.; Nasir, J.; Shah, S.M.A.; Arnieri, E.; Yoo, H. Dual-Band Two-Port MIMO Antenna for Biomedical Deep Tissue Communication: Design, Characterization, and Performance Analysis. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 104622–104632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jing, D.; Li, H.; Ding, X.; Shao, W.; Xiao, S. Compact and Broadband Circularly Polarized Implantable Antenna for Wireless Implantable Medical Devices. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2023, 22, 1236–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ahlawat, S.; Kaim, V.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Singh, N.; Rambabu, K.; Singh, S.P.; Lay-Ekuakille, A. Design and Performance Measurement of Implantable Differential Integrated Antenna for Wireless Biomedical Instrumentation Applications. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, K.; Li, Z.; Cui, W.; Zhang, K.; Wang, M.; Fan, C.; Zheng, H.; Li, E. Investigation of Conformal MIMO Antenna for Implantable Devices Based on Theory of Characteristic Modes. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 11324–11334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, D.; Kaim, V.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Singh, N.; Kumar, S.; Rambabu, K. A Triple Band Circularly Polarized Antenna for Leadless Cardiac Transcatheter Pacing System. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 4287–4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, K.; Särestöniemi, M.; Myllymäki, S.; Soh, P.J.; Chen, J.; Yan, S. A Wideband Circularly Polarized Antenna with Metasurface Plane for Biomedical Telemetry. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2024, 23, 1879–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shah, S.M.A.; Zada, M.; Nasir, J.; Owais, O.; Iqbal, A.; Yoo, H. Miniaturized Four-Port MIMO Implantable Antenna for High-Data-Rate Wireless-Capsule-Endoscopy Applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2023, 71, 3123–3133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, C.; Hao, S.; Zhang, Y. 915 MHz Miniaturized Loop Conformal Antenna for Capsule Endoscope. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2022, 70, 10233–10244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Geometry of the designed antenna. (a) Bottom view; (b) top view; (c) side view (the gap between the superstrate and antenna layer is 0 mm).
Figure 1. Geometry of the designed antenna. (a) Bottom view; (b) top view; (c) side view (the gap between the superstrate and antenna layer is 0 mm).
Sensors 24 05292 g001
Figure 2. Implantable device and external receiving equipment.
Figure 2. Implantable device and external receiving equipment.
Sensors 24 05292 g002
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of the simulated |S11| when the antenna with and without the superstrate; (b) variation in |S11| with superstrate layer to radiating patch gap (gap = 0 mm is the ideal case); (c) comparison chart with and without integrated device |S11|.
Figure 3. (a) Comparison of the simulated |S11| when the antenna with and without the superstrate; (b) variation in |S11| with superstrate layer to radiating patch gap (gap = 0 mm is the ideal case); (c) comparison chart with and without integrated device |S11|.
Sensors 24 05292 g003aSensors 24 05292 g003b
Figure 4. Antenna design procedure. (a) Step 1; (b) step 2; (c) step 3; (d) step 4.
Figure 4. Antenna design procedure. (a) Step 1; (b) step 2; (c) step 3; (d) step 4.
Sensors 24 05292 g004aSensors 24 05292 g004b
Figure 5. The simulated (a) |S11| and (b) AR in antenna evolution process.
Figure 5. The simulated (a) |S11| and (b) AR in antenna evolution process.
Sensors 24 05292 g005aSensors 24 05292 g005b
Figure 6. The simulated AR of the optimized antenna. Phi = 0° and Phi = 90°.
Figure 6. The simulated AR of the optimized antenna. Phi = 0° and Phi = 90°.
Sensors 24 05292 g006
Figure 7. Current vector distribution on antenna radiation surface. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Figure 7. Current vector distribution on antenna radiation surface. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Sensors 24 05292 g007aSensors 24 05292 g007b
Figure 8. The simulated CP gain at xoy-plane and xoz-plane. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Figure 8. The simulated CP gain at xoy-plane and xoz-plane. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Sensors 24 05292 g008
Figure 9. Antenna detuning immunity. (a) |S11|; (b) AR; (c) Gain.
Figure 9. Antenna detuning immunity. (a) |S11|; (b) AR; (c) Gain.
Sensors 24 05292 g009aSensors 24 05292 g009b
Figure 10. Analogue SAR (W/kg) in single-skinned human tissue and integrated packages. (a) 1.9 GHz (human tissue); (b) 2.45 GHz (human tissue); (c) 1.9 GHz (integrated package); (d) 2.45 GHz (integrated package).
Figure 10. Analogue SAR (W/kg) in single-skinned human tissue and integrated packages. (a) 1.9 GHz (human tissue); (b) 2.45 GHz (human tissue); (c) 1.9 GHz (integrated package); (d) 2.45 GHz (integrated package).
Sensors 24 05292 g010aSensors 24 05292 g010b
Figure 11. Link margin versus distance for different frequencies. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.5 GHz.
Figure 11. Link margin versus distance for different frequencies. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.5 GHz.
Sensors 24 05292 g011
Figure 12. Antenna prototype and test scenario.
Figure 12. Antenna prototype and test scenario.
Sensors 24 05292 g012
Figure 13. Antenna| S11| results in simulated and measured cases.
Figure 13. Antenna| S11| results in simulated and measured cases.
Sensors 24 05292 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of the axial ratio between the simulated results and measured results.
Figure 14. Comparison of the axial ratio between the simulated results and measured results.
Sensors 24 05292 g014
Figure 15. The circularly polarized gain measurements compared to simulated results of the antenna at 1.9 GHz. (a) Phi = 0°; (b) Phi = 90°.
Figure 15. The circularly polarized gain measurements compared to simulated results of the antenna at 1.9 GHz. (a) Phi = 0°; (b) Phi = 90°.
Sensors 24 05292 g015
Figure 16. The circularly polarized gain measurements compared to simulated results of the antenna at 2.45 GHz. (a) Phi = 0°; (b) Phi = 90°.
Figure 16. The circularly polarized gain measurements compared to simulated results of the antenna at 2.45 GHz. (a) Phi = 0°; (b) Phi = 90°.
Sensors 24 05292 g016
Figure 17. The simulated 3D radiation patterns of the designed antenna. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Figure 17. The simulated 3D radiation patterns of the designed antenna. (a) 1.9 GHz; (b) 2.45 GHz.
Sensors 24 05292 g017
Table 1. Key parameters of the designed antenna and their sizes, and all sizes are in mm.
Table 1. Key parameters of the designed antenna and their sizes, and all sizes are in mm.
ParameterValueParameterValue
L19.0W40.5
L29.8W50.5
L37.5W65.5
W10.2R14.2
W20.379R22.7
W30.2d10.5
Table 2. Parameters of the link budget.
Table 2. Parameters of the link budget.
Transmitter
Operating frequency1.9 GHz2.45 GHz
Tx power Pt (dBm)4.245.02
Tx antenna gain Gt (dBi)−18.8−19.1
Receiver
Rx antenna Gain Gr (dBi)2.152.15
PolarizationCPCP
Ambient temperature T0 (K)293293
Receiver noise figure NF (dB)3.53.5
Boltzmann constant k1.38 × 10−231.38 × 10−23
Noise power density (dB/Hz)−199.95−199.95
Signal quality
Bite rate Br (Mb/s)11
Bite error rate1.0 × 10−51.0 × 10−5
Eb/N0 (ideal-BPSK) (dB)9.69.6
Coding gain (dB)00
Fixing deterioration Gd (dB)2.52.5
Table 3. Tissue properties, size, and shape.
Table 3. Tissue properties, size, and shape.
Ref.TissueSize (mm)Frequency (GHz)Permittivity
r)
Conductivity
S/m (σ)
Shape
[5]skin, fat30 × 30 × 5.22.455.27490.26cuboid
[19]skin, fat, muscle130 × 130 × 45.272.45
1.90
5.28
53.4
0.26
1.39
cuboid
[23]skin, fat, muscle100 × 100 × 1002.4552.71.74cube
[24]skin100 × 100 × 1002.45381.46cube
[25]skin
skin
120 × 120 × 402.45
0.915
38
11.3
1.46
0.11
cuboid
[26]skin100 × 100 × 1002.4542.921.56cube
This work.skin89.8 × 89.8 × 26.271.90
2.45
53.4
38
1.39
1.46
cuboid
Table 4. Comparison of this paper with the literature.
Table 4. Comparison of this paper with the literature.
Ref.Size (λ03)Frequency (GHz)FBW(%)3-dB AR (%)Gain (dBi)CPTissue
[5]0.167 × 0.291 × 0.032.456.7no−2.0nofat
[20]0.08 × 0.08 × 0.012.45
1.9
18.7
7.5
17.26
1.37
−18.5
−21.8
yes
yes
fat
muscle
[24]0.09 × 0.047 × 0.0022.456.1no−22.2nomuscle
[25]0.08 × 0.08 × 0.012.453028.7−24.7yesskin
[26]0.103 × 0.103 × 0.012.45
0.915
10.2
16.4
no
no
−21.2
−30.3
no
no
skin
[27]0.13 × 0.07 × 0.032.4514.3no−20.0noskin
This work.0.054 × 0.054 × 0.011.90
2.45
57.9
44.9
31.4
24.1
−24.6
−20.0
yes
yes
skin
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, Z.; Li, M. Ultra-Wideband Circular Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for Implantable Blood Glucose Detection System Applications. Sensors 2024, 24, 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165292

AMA Style

Song Z, Li M. Ultra-Wideband Circular Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for Implantable Blood Glucose Detection System Applications. Sensors. 2024; 24(16):5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Zhiwei, and Mengke Li. 2024. "Ultra-Wideband Circular Polarized Implantable Patch Antenna for Implantable Blood Glucose Detection System Applications" Sensors 24, no. 16: 5292. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24165292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop