Next Article in Journal
Anomaly Detection on the Edge Using Smart Cameras under Low-Light Conditions
Previous Article in Journal
Accuracy Improvement of Automatic Smoky Diesel Vehicle Detection Using YOLO Model, Matching, and Refinement
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Upconversion-Powered Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis for DNA Sensing

1
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Special Functional Materials & Guangdong Research Center for Interfacial Engineering of Functional Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Quantum Manipulation and New Energy Materials, College of Physics and Energy, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(3), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030773
Submission received: 30 October 2023 / Revised: 18 January 2024 / Accepted: 22 January 2024 / Published: 24 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Chemical Sensors)

Abstract

:
In this work, we report a new concept of upconversion-powered photoelectrochemical (PEC) bioanalysis. The proof-of-concept involves a PEC bionanosystem comprising a NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) reporter, which is confined by DNA hybridization on a CdS quantum dots (QDs)/indium tin oxide (ITO) photoelectrode. The CdS QD-modified ITO electrode was powered by upconversion absorption together with energy transfer effect through UCNPs for a stable photocurrent generation. By measuring the photocurrent change, the target DNA could be detected in a specific and sensitive way with a wide linear range from 10 pM to 1 μM and a low detection limit of 0.1 pM. This work exploited the use of UCNPs as signal reporters and realized upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis. Given the diversity of UCNPs, we believe it will offer a new perspective for the development of advanced upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis.

1. Introduction

Currently, advanced photoelectrochemical (PEC) bioanalysis is aggressively pursued among the electroanalytical community. PEC-based biosensing has a broad scope, encompassing various biomarkers such as nucleic acids, proteins, metabolites, cells, bacteria, and viruses [1,2,3,4,5]. The process of biomolecular recognition exhibits selectivity through mechanisms like DNA hybridization, immunological interactions, and enzymatic reactions. The detection of biomarkers enables the identification and quantification of various biological entities, facilitating research in molecular structure, disease detection and prevention, as well as ensuring food safety and monitoring environmental pollution [6,7,8]. To date, substantial efforts have recently been devoted to the design and development of photoelectrodes, signal transduction, and sensing modes for superior PEC detection [9,10,11,12]. In particular, innovative signaling transducers based on functional material are expected to be a powerful strategy to achieve advanced PEC bioanalysis [13]. Traditionally, ultraviolet or visible light is usually used as the illumination for photocurrent generation in PEC biosensors. Compared to ultraviolet or visible light, near-infrared (NIR) light offers advantages in bioanalysis for PEC biosensors. Its longer wavelength and lower energy enable deeper tissue penetration, minimal photobleaching, and reduced phototoxicity, making it a promising option for biosensing applications [14,15]. However, NIR-activated studies are seldom reported in the field of PEC bioanalysis, probably due to the fact that the low energy of NIR light cannot excite the electron–hole pairs of common semiconductors (>1.8 eV) [16,17]. Therefore, it is expected that photosensitive materials can be driven by low-energy NIR efficiently while achieving high efficiency PEC conversion for high-quality sensing platforms.
Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are a group of inorganic nanoparticles with the ability to exhibit anti-Stokes photoluminescence. Through a multi-photon absorption process, UCNPs can convert low-energy NIR light into higher-energy ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) light. These UCNPs have been identified as promising photosensitive materials for various biological applications [18,19,20]. Due to their unique optical upconversion capability and outstanding properties such as deep penetrability, low light damage, and high light stability, UCNPs are gaining increasing interest in the construction of NIR-light-driven PEC biosensors [21,22,23,24,25]. For example, using NaYF4:Yb,Er particles combined with CdTe/TiO2 heterostructures, a NIR-light-motivated PEC interface was constructed for PEC aptasensing of cancer cells [16]. Very recently, NaYF4:Yb,Tm-based UCNP@SiO2@Ag@C-g-C3N4 core–shell nanospheres were developed for ultrasensitive PEC detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 [26]. However, despite this progress, these exploitations are highly limited in the use of UCNP–semiconductor hybrids as photoelectrodes, in which a strong interfacial reflection between UCNPs and semiconductor has led to an unsatisfactory utilization of light sources [23,27,28]. To utilize light sources efficiently, we assume that UCNPs present a good reporter to directly transduce the biorecognition event via converting NIR light in PEC bioanalytical systems. Unfortunately, such a possibility has seldom been unveiled.
This study aims to investigate the concept of upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis, which involves utilizing UCNPs as a reporter for efficient long-wavelength light harvesting. The UCNPs are employed to align their upconversion phenomena with wide bandgap photosensitive semiconductors on the photoelectrode. This alignment activates the semiconductors for photocurrent generation, and the system is evaluated using DNA recognition. For proof-of-concept experiments, CdS quantum dots (QDs) modified on indium tin oxide (ITO) were used to construct the photoelectrode. NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 UCNPs (hereafter briefed as UCNPs) were served as the NIR-light motivated PEC interface, which was confined by the double-stranded DNA hybridization. The visible-light-absorption of CdS QDs spectrally overlaps with the emission of the UCNPs, which makes it possible to use the latter as luminescent material to convert NIR light and excite the former. Meanwhile, energy transfer occurred when the UCNPs were placed in close proximity to the CdS QDs. By measuring the photocurrent change, target single-stranded DNA was detected in a specific and sensitive way with a detection limit of 0.1 pM. This work presents the use of UCNPs as signal relay and the resulting upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis. Given the diversity of UCNPs and the superior benefits of NIR light, we believe this presents a different perspective for the general development of advanced upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

Indium tin oxide (ITO) was purchased from Zhuhai Kaivo Optoelectronic Technology Co., Ltd., Zhuhai, China. Ascorbic acid (AA) and monoethanolamine (MEA) were obtained from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. Poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDDA), 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Co Ltd., Shanghai, China. UCNPs were obtained from Hangzhou Fluo NanoTech Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China. DNA sequences were obtained from Genscript Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China, and the corresponding sequences are summarized in Table S1. All other reagents were of analytical grade and were used as received.

2.2. Designing and Assembling of the Photoelectrode

The ITO slices were cleaned by boiling in 2 M KOH solution dissolved in 2-propanol for 20 min, and then were washed by abundant amounts of DI water. CdS QDs were synthesized by using a water-based method and then immobilized onto the ITO electrode with an area of 0.3 cm2 using the previous technology [29]. Then, the ITO electrode modified with CdS QDs was immersed in a mixture of EDC (20 mg/mL) and NHS (10 mg/mL) for 1 h at room temperature. After that, 25 μL of 1 μM probe DNA was dropped onto ITO electrodes and kept for 12 h at 4 °C. The interaction between CdS QDs and DNA fragments is covalent bonding through carboxyl modified on CdS QDs and amino modified on DNA fragments. Then, the electrodes were carefully washed with 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) solution to remove the non-immobilized DNA probes. Subsequently, the electrode was blocked by 1 mM MEA for 2 h at 4 °C to eliminate excess carboxyl groups.

2.3. Construction of UCNPs Reporter and Detection of Target DNA

Firstly, UCNPs were covalently connected with target DNA. Specifically, 50 μL of 10 μM UCNP aqueous solution and 100 μL of 10 mM EDC were added to 1 mL of 10 mM PBS and kept at room temperature for 30 min. Then, 50 μL of 10 mM NHS and 50 μL of 10 μM target DNA were added to the above solution and kept at room temperature for 3 h. The junctional complex was collected by centrifugal filtration and the sediment was redispersed by 10 mM PBS. Amine-contained target DNA was connected with UCNPs capped with carboxylic acid groups via the classic EDC/NHS coupling reaction. The oligonucleotide sequences of the 24 base pairs used here are listed in Supplementary Materials (Table S1). Unconnected target DNA and UCNPs were removed by using centrifugal filtration.
For target DNA detection, 25 μL of target DNA labeled with UCNPs was dropped onto the photoelectrodes and kept for 1 h at 37 °C to achieve the hybridization. Then, the electrodes were washed three times with 10 mM PBS (pH 7.4) to remove the unhybridized DNA targets.

2.4. Characterizations and Measurements

The photoluminescence (PL) spectra were obtained by using a 970 CRT Fluorescence Spectrophotometer (INESA, Shanghai, China). The UV-vis absorption spectra were obtained by using a UV-2450-visible Spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were obtained by using a Nicolet-6700 Fourier Infrared Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA).
The successful preparation of the UCNP-powered PEC biosensor was confirmed by using a regular PEC system with three electrodes, where a modified ITO electrode with an area of 0.3 cm2 was used as working electrode, a platinum plate electrode as the counter electrode, and a saturated Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode. The electrolyte was 0.1 M PBS containing 0.1 M AA, in which AA served as the electron donor. Photocurrent was measured by using a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, Shanghai, China) at a constant potential of 0 V (vs. saturated Ag/AgCl). The excitation wavelength was 980 nm under the dark environment.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization

The principle of the UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis construct for DNA detection is schematically described in Figure 1. Carboxyl-functionalized CdS QDs were modified on ITO substrate and then covalently bound with amino-modified probe single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). On the other hand, an NaYF4:Yb,Tm core was coated with an undoped NaYF4 shell and then coated with a polyethylene glycol (PEG) layer for further carboxylation with amino-modified target ssDNA. Figure S1 shows the FTIR spectrum of the UCNPs, which proves that carboxyl groups were successfully modified on the surface of the UCNPs. Hybridization of the probe ssDNA and target complementary ssDNA brings the distance between UCNPs and CdS QDs closer, to within 10 nm, as the DNA sequence is 24 base pairs (about 1 nm for 3 base pairs). UCNPs possess the ability to convert near-infrared excitation (980 nm) into visible emissions that align with the absorption spectral range of CdS QDs. Therefore, the fluorescence of luminescent UCNPs could serve as an excitation source to activate CdS QDs for photocurrent generation. The concentration of target DNA determines the intensity of fluorescence emitted by UCNPs, and then the level of photocurrent. By measuring the photocurrent change, the target DNA can be sensitively detected.
UCNPs and CdS QDs are the materials critical for the novel PEC biosensor. For successful construction of the bioanalytical system, the size and structure of UCNPs and CdS QDs were investigated. Figure 2a,b shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of the NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 sample. It can be seen that the NaYF4 shell was uniformly coated on the surface of the NaYF4:Yb,Tm core, indicating a relativity to a decrease in surface defects of the lattice and concomitantly the energy dissipation reduction, as well as to a light-harvesting improvement [30,31]. Moreover, a PEG-COOH layer was uniformly coated on UCNPs, with a thickness of around 3.5 nm. Figure 2c shows the TEM image of CdS QDs with an approximate diameter of 5 nm. A typical UV-vis absorption spectrum of the prepared CdS QDs and a photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of the UCNPs were obtained to prove the stable and effective upconversion luminescence to the excitation of CdS QDs. As shown in Figure 2d, two emission peaks around 450 nm and 475 nm were resolved for the core–shell nanoparticles (UCNPs), suggesting an excellent fluorescence intensity which is much higher than that of the core-only structure [32,33]. Meanwhile, there is a distinct absorption of light under 500 nm for the CdS QDs. The overlap of the two spectra ensures that the fluorescence of the UCNPs can effectively excite the CdS QDs to transfer the electrons in the valence band to the conduction band.

3.2. Sensitive Detection of DNA

After construction of the sensing platform, PEC behaviors for DNA detection were verified and analyzed. A typical time-based photocurrent response for each step measured in 0.1 M PBS containing 0.1 M AA was recorded under 980 nm illumination, as shown in Figure 3a–c. Specifically, at the first stage, the CdS QD-modified ITO electrode showed a weak NIR photocurrent under illumination (CdS curve of Figure 3a, black curve) because of the fractional absorption of near-infrared light by CdS QDs. Compared with the photocurrent generated by the UV-vis light-activated CdS QD-modified ITO electrode, the magnitude was lower by one or two orders [34,35]. After the probe DNA was grafted to CdS QDs, the photocurrent decreased a lot as depicted in ssDNA curve (red curve) when compared with the initial intensity in the CdS curve (black curve). This decrease could be mostly attributed to the steric hindrance effect, in which the probe ssDNA and MEA had a certain volume and would impede the electron transfer in PEC system. After that, the UCNP-powered PEC system was used for the detection of target ssDNA, in which the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) was obtained by the hybridization of probe ssDNA and target complementary ssDNA. The platform was first exposed to the UCNP-labeled target DNA with a concentration of 10−6 M. We found that there was an apparent inverse increase in the photocurrent, as shown in dsDNA curve (blue curve). This increase in photocurrent was mainly due to the hybridization of target complementary DNA with probe DNA, which introduced the NIR-light-activated UCNPs into the system. During exposure to target DNA, UCNPs were placed in close proximity to CdS QDs. By adjusting the concentrations of Yb3+ and Tm3+ ions, the primary emission peaks of UCNPs were tuned to 450 nm and 475 nm when excited by NIR light at 980 nm. Simultaneously, the synthesized CdS QDs exhibited an efficient absorption of visible light below 500 nm. Consequently, the fluorescence emitted by UCNPs effectively served as an excitation source to activate the CdS QDs, thereby enabling the generation of photocurrent. Figure S2 shows the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum and UV-vis absorption spectrum of the target DNA which connected with/without UCNPs. We can see that individual DNA shows no PL intensity around 450 nm and 475 nm, and individual UCNPs show no unique absorption peak at 260 nm, proving the efficient connection of UCNPs and target DNA. Therefore, the target DNA could be detected by measuring the photocurrent change. The UCNP-powered PEC biosensor for DNA detection provides a new method with covalently immobilized UCNPs as a reporter and QDs as an acceptor, which is different from other UCNP-driven PEC sensors with UCNP–semiconductor hybrids as photoelectrodes [16,22,23,26].
Using the same method, the detection limit of target DNA was studied by varying the concentration from 1 × 10−13 M to 1 × 10−6 M, while the concentration of probe DNA was fixed at 1 μM, as shown in Figure 3d. Under each condition, at least three samples were tested. Here, we use the percentage of photocurrent change (ΔI/I) to represent the signal response caused by the hybridization of target DNA with probe DNA, which is given by the following equation:
Δ I / I = I dsDNA I ssDNA I ssDNA
where IssDNA and IdsDNA correspond to the photocurrent response after the immobilization of probe DNA and the detection of target DNA, respectively. As shown in Figure 3d, ΔI/I increased accordingly with the increasing concentration of target DNA, suggesting a near-linear relationship from 1 × 10−11 M to 1 × 10−6 M. An increase of 30.2% in ΔI/I was found when the concentration of target DNA was 10−6 M, while an increase of only 4.7% was observed for the 10−13 M of target DNA. As the ΔI/I caused by pure PBS solution (baseline noise) was only 1.2%, the detection limit for target DNA by our UCNP-powered PEC-based biosensor was considered to be 10−13 M (0.1 pM). The reproducibility of the sensor is important and effective for verification of the test result and stability of the platform. Hence, six sets of assays were conducted under identical conditions, with a target DNA concentration of 1 μM. The photocurrents of the electrodes showed minimal variation at each step involving the modification of CdS QDs, ssDNA, and dsDNA (Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials). These results serve to validate the reproducibility and stability of the detection platform.
Actually, the steric hindrance effect caused by the hybridization of target DNA may hinder electron transfer in the PEC system. So, control experiments which measured the hybridization of target DNA without labeled UCNPs were conducted for comparison. As shown in Figure 4a, in the absence of UCNP activation, the photocurrent declined further after the hybridization of unlabeled target DNA in comparison to the photocurrent of the photoelectrode with probe DNA. The further decline in photocurrent was deduced by the increased space-hindered effect based on the unlabeled target DNA. As shown in Figure 4b, −ΔI/I decreased with the decrease in the concentration of unlabeled target DNA, suggesting a detection limit of only 10 nM (much worse than that of UCNP-powered sensors). The results clearly show that the observed increase in photocurrent in the UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis was achieved by overcoming the steric hindrance effect induced by the target DNA itself. This highlights the significant impact of UCNPs in the system.

3.3. Energy Transfer of Upconversion-Powered Photoelectrochemical DNA Sensor

The sensing mechanism of the UCNP-powered PEC DNA sensor was studied. Figure 5 illustrates in detail the proposed electron and energy transfer route of the whole process, which refers to the excitation, upconversion, photo reabsorption (PR), energy transfer (ET), and emission. In the NaYF4:Yb,Tm structure, Yb3+ ions show a strong absorption of light at 900–1000 nm. Under the 980 nm illumination, Tm3+ ions are triggered to their high-energy levels through energy-transfer upconversion from excited Yb3+ ions to Tm3+ ions. Corresponding to the energy level transfer of 1D23F4 (450 nm) and 1G43H6 (475 nm), fluorescence levels of 450 nm and 475 nm are emitted. Then, on the one hand, the blue emissions of UCNPs are just in the absorption range of CdS QDs and can be absorbed by CdS QDs. The blue emission of UCNPs excites the transfer of CdS QDs electrons from the valence band to the conduction band and, subsequently, further transfer to the ITO electrode for the generation of photocurrent. Thus, it effectively avoids the radiative decay of CdS QDs. In this process, the 0.1 M ascorbic acid (AA) electrolyte served as an electron donor to provide enough electrons for electron transfer. On the other hand, the 1G4 energy level of the Tm3+ ion is higher than the conduction band of the CdS QDs, and there is a close distance within 10 nm between the UCNPs and CdS QDs, which is the length of DNA. As a result, an efficient energy transfer can occur between the two energy bands, leading to photocurrent generation caused by electron transfer to the ITO electrode. Some works have reported biosensors based on the energy transfer effect [36,37,38]. Powered by upconversion absorption together with the energy transfer effect through UCNPs, a photocurrent change can be detected for DNA sensing in the proposed PEC bioanalysis method.

3.4. Selectivity of DNA Sensor

In addition, the selectivity of the PEC-based biosensor was also investigated by evaluating the performance of the platform. Interference experiments were conducted with target complementary DNA (cDNA), two non-complementary DNA strands (ncDNA1 and ncDNA2), and background solution (0.1 M PBS, pH 7.4) as control experiments following the same measuring procedure. A sufficient amount of analyte with a concentration of 1 × 10−6 M was applied for better signal response, so as to verify the selectivity. As shown in Figure 6, no obvious photocurrent change occurred due to the non-specific effect of the two non-complementary DNA strands and background solution. Compared with the 30.2% photocurrent change for the target cDNA, the signal response changes in the other three non-specific analytes were all below 2.5%, which indicated the excellent specificity of the UCNP-powered PEC biosensor.

4. Conclusions

In summary, this study presents a novel UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis construct for DNA sensing. In this system, NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 UCNPs were confined onto an CdS QD-modified ITO electrode via DNA hybridization. UCNPs were employed as the NIR-light-driven PEC interface, where the CdS QD-modified ITO electrode utilized upconversion absorption and energy transfer from the UCNPs to generate photocurrent. This was facilitated by the spectral overlap and matching energy levels between UCNPs and CdS QDs. By measuring the photocurrent change, the target complementary DNA could be detected in a specific and sensitive way with a detection limit of 0.1 pM. This work proposes the use of UCNPs as signal relay and in upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis. Given the diversity of UCNPs and the superior benefits of NIR light, we believe it will present a different perspective for the general development of advanced upconversion-powered PEC bioanalysis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s24030773/s1, Table S1: The DNA sequences; Figure S1: The Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectrum of UCNPs coated with PEG-COOH; Figure S2: The photoluminescence (PL) spectrum (a) and UV-vis absorption spectrum (b) of UCNP-labeled target DNA. Figure S3: The photocurrent of six electrodes with the modification of (a) CdS QDs, (b) ssDNA, and (c) dsDNA (1 μM). (d) Comparison of the photocurrent of six work electrodes at each step.

Author Contributions

P.L. proposed the conception of this manuscript. H.L. contributed to the background investigation and methodology. H.L. and P.L. performed the data collection and analysis. H.L. and W.W. contributed to the original draft preparation. P.L., W.W. and H.L. reviewed and edited the writing. J.S., J.H. and Z.W. provided assistance in electrode preparation and sample characterization. P.L. and W.W. supervised and provided financial support for this study. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 62371304), the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2022A1515010886), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (No. JCYJ20190808142217123), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Ultrafast Laser Micro/Nano Manufacturing ZDSYS20220606100405013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article and Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, R.; Tu, W.; Wang, H.; Dai, Z. Near-infrared light excited and localized surface plasmon resonance-enhanced photoelectrochemical biosensing platform for cell analysis. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 9403–9409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Tabrizi, M.A.; Nazari, L.; Acedo, P. A photo-electrochemical aptasensor for the determination of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 receptor-binding domain by using graphitic carbon nitride-cadmium sulfide quantum dots nanocomposite. Sens. Actuators B 2021, 345, 130377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Jiang, D.; Yang, C.; Fan, Y.; Leung, H.P.; Inthavong, K.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, M. Ultra-sensitive photoelectrochemical aptamer biosensor for detecting E. coli O157:H7 based on nonmetallic plasmonic two-dimensional hydrated defective tungsten oxide nanosheets coupling with nitrogen-doped graphene quantum dots (dWO3•H2O@N-GQDs). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2021, 183, 113214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, N.; Zhao, W.; Liang, Y.; Xu, J.; Chen, H. Photoelectrochemical bioanalysis of protein biomarkers. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2018, 10, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Y.; Zhong, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z. An ultrasensitive and wearable photoelectrochemical sensor for unbiased and accurate monitoring of sweat glucose. Sens. Actuators B 2022, 354, 131204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, Q.; Tang, D. Recent advances in photoelectrochemical biosensors for analysis of mycotoxins in food. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 124, 115814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zeng, R.; Gong, H.; Li, Y.; Li, Y.; Lin, W.; Tang, D.; Knopp, D. CRISPR-Cas12a- derived photoelectrochemical biosensor for point-of-care diagnosis of nucleic acid. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 7442–7448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, H. Photoelectrochemical DNA biosensors. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 7421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, H. Photoelectrochemical bioanalysis: The state of the art. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 729–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Liu, X.; Tang, D. Liposome-mediated in situ formation of type-I heterojunction for amplified photoelectrochemical immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 4859–4865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, Z.; Xu, Z.; Hu, J.; Wei, W.; Zeng, X.; Zhao, W.; Lin, P. Ascorbic acid-mediated organic photoelectrochemical transistor sensing strategy for highly sensitive detection of heart-type fatty acid binding protein. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 201, 113958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Devadoss, A.; Sudhagar, P.; Terashima, C.; Nakata, K.; Fujishima, A. Photoelectrochemical biosensors: New insights into promising photoelectrodes and signal amplification strategies. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2015, 24, 43–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Su, Z.; Tang, D.; Yang, X.; Peng, Y.; Wang, B.; Li, X.; Chen, J.; Hu, Y.; Qin, X. Selective and fast growth of CdS nanocrystals on zinc (II) metal–organic framework architectures for photoelectrochemical response and electrochemical immunosensor of foot-and-mouth disease virus. Microchem. J. 2022, 174, 107038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wu, W.; Zhang, Z. Defect-engineered TiO2 nanotube photonic crystals for the fabrication of near-infrared photoelectrochemical sensor. J. Mater. Chem. B 2017, 5, 4883–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Zheng, C.; Yin, M.; Su, B.; Peng, A.; Guo, Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, X. A novel near-infrared light-responsive photoelectrochemical platform for detecting microcystin-LR in fish based on Ag2S cubes and plasmonic Au nanoparticles. Talanta 2021, 221, 121447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wang, K.; Zhang, R.; Sun, N.; Li, X.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Pei, R. Near-infrared light-driven photoelectrochemical aptasensor based on the upconversion nanoparticles and TiO2/CdTe heterostructure for detection of cancer cells. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2016, 8, 25834–25839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fu, B.; Wu, W.; Gan, L.; Zhang, Z. Bulk/surface defects engineered TiO2 nanotube photonic crystals coupled with plasmonic gold nanoparticles for effective in vivo near-infrared light photoelectrochemical detection. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 14611–14617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pini, F.; Frances-Soriano, L.; Andrigo, V.; Natile, M.M.; Hildebrandt, N. Optimizing upconversion nanoparticles for FRET Biosensing. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 4971–4984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, J.; Gao, J.; Xue, W.; Di, Z.; Xing, H.; Lu, Y.; Li, L. Upconversion luminescence-activated DNA nanodevice for ATP sensing in living cells. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, L.; Shi, R.; Zhao, R.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, B.; Gai, S.; Feng, L. Near-infrared upconversion mesoporous tin dioxide theranostic nanocapsules for synergetic cancer chemophototherapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2022, 14, 2650–2662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, H.; Wang, M.; Chi, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, D.; Wei, Q. Sandwich-type photoelectrochemical immunosensor for procalcitonin detection based on Mn2+ doped CdS sensitized Bi2WO6 and signal amplification of NaYF4:Yb, Tm upconversion nanomaterial. Anal. Chim. Acta 2021, 1188, 339190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Miao, P.; Zhou, Y.; Li, C.; Li, J.; Wang, W.; Ma, T.; Lv, Y.; Song, Z.; Zhang, J.; Yan, M. Near-infrared light-induced photoelectrochemical biosensor based on plasmon-enhanced upconversion nanocomposites for microRNA-155 detection with cascade amplifications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 226, 115145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Luo, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, R.; Su, L.; Tang, D. Near-infrared light-excited core–core–shell UCNP@Au@CdS upconversion nanospheres for ultrasensitive photoelectrochemical enzyme immunoassay. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 9568–9575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Hao, M.; Miao, P.; Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Ge, S.; Yu, X.; Hu, X.; Ding, B.; Zhang, J.; Yan, M. Near-infrared light-initiated photoelectrochemical biosensor based on upconversion nanorods for immobilization-free miRNA detection with double signal amplification. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 11251–11258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Luo, Z.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, R.; Su, L.; Tang, D. Branched polyethylenimine-modified upconversion nanohybrid-mediated photoelectrochemical immunoassay with synergistic effect of dual-purpose copper ions. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 4149–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yin, M.; Liu, C.; Ge, R.; Fang, Y.; Wei, J.; Chen, X.; Chen, Q.; Chen, X. Paper-supported near-infrared-light-triggered photoelectrochemical platform for monitoring Escherichia coli O157:H7 based on silver nanoparticles-sensitized-upconversion nanophosphors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2022, 203, 114022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Feng, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Fang, Z.; Wang, B.; Zhang, S.; Liu, P. Near-infrared-activated NaYF4:Yb3+, Er 3+/Au/CdS for H2 production via photoreforming of bio-ethanol: Plasmonic Au as light nanoantenna, energy relay, electron sink and co-catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10311–10320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, S.; Matsuoka, T.; Shimotsuma, Y.; Sakakura, M.; Nishi, M.; Hong, Z.; Qiu, J.; Hirao, K.; Miura, K. Localized control of light–matter interactions by using nanoscale asymmetric TiO2. Nanotechnology 2012, 23, 465704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, J.; Lin, P.; Ruan, Y.; Zhao, W.; Wei, W.; Hu, J.; Ke, S.; Zeng, X.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; et al. Organic photo-electrochemical transistor-based biosensor: A proof-of-concept study toward highly sensitive DNA detection. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2018, 7, 1800536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, Y.; Liu, K.; Liu, X.; Dohnalova, K.; Gregorkiewicz, T.; Kong, X.; Aalders, M.C.G.; Buma, W.J.; Zhang, H. Critical shell thickness of core/shell upconversion luminescence nanoplatform for FRET application. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2011, 2, 2083–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Fischer, S.; Johnson, N.J.J.; Pichaandi, J.; Goldschmidt, J.C.; van Veggel, F.C.J.M. Upconverting core-shell nanocrystals with high quantum yield under low irradiance: On the role of isotropic and thick shells. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 118, 193105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mai, H.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, L.; Yan, C. Highly efficient multicolor up-conversion emissions and their mechanisms of monodisperse NaYF4:Yb,Er core and core/shell-structured nanocrystals. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13721–13729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yi, G.; Chow, G. Water-soluble NaYF4:Yb,Er(Tm)/NaYF4/polymer core/shell/shell nanoparticles with significant enhancement of upconversion fluorescence. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 341–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ruan, Y.; Shi, X.; Wang, H.; Zhao, W.; Xu, J.; Chen, H. CdS quantum dots modified photoelectrochemical biosensor for TATA-binding protein probing. Methods Mol. Biol. 2020, 2135, 237–247. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lin, P.; Liu, D.; Wei, W.; Guo, J.; Ke, S.; Zeng, X.; Chen, S. A novel protein binding strategy for energy-transfer-based photoelectrochemical detection of enzymatic activity of botulinum neurotoxin A. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 97, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jin, B.; Wang, S.; Lin, M.; Jin, Y.; Zhang, S.; Cui, X.; Gong, Y.; Li, A.; Xu, F.; Lu, T. Upconversion nanoparticles based FRET aptasensor for rapid and ultrasenstive bacteria detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 90, 525–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Doughan, S.; Uddayasankar, U.; Krull, U.J. A paper-based resonance energy transfer nucleic acid hybridization assay using upconversion nanoparticles as donors and quantum dots as acceptors. Anal. Chim. Acta 2015, 878, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Su, Q.; Feng, W.; Yang, D.; Li, F. Resonance energy transfer in upconversion nanoplatforms for selective biodetection. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis for DNA sensing.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis for DNA sensing.
Sensors 24 00773 g001
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of PEG-COOH coated NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 UCNPs. (b) HRTEM image of NaYF4:Yb,Tm core, which is the cubic phase, where the interplanar spacing of (111) plane is 0.314 nm. (c) TEM image of CdS QDs. (d) The UV-vis absorption spectrum of prepared CdS QDs (red) and the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of UCNPs (blue); the excitation wavelength is 980 nm. Inset is photograph of the UCNPs in water under 980 nm laser illumination.
Figure 2. (a) TEM image of PEG-COOH coated NaYF4:Yb,Tm@NaYF4 UCNPs. (b) HRTEM image of NaYF4:Yb,Tm core, which is the cubic phase, where the interplanar spacing of (111) plane is 0.314 nm. (c) TEM image of CdS QDs. (d) The UV-vis absorption spectrum of prepared CdS QDs (red) and the photoluminescence (PL) spectrum of UCNPs (blue); the excitation wavelength is 980 nm. Inset is photograph of the UCNPs in water under 980 nm laser illumination.
Sensors 24 00773 g002
Figure 3. Photocurrent responses measured in 0.1 M AA solution after the modification of CdS QDs (black curve), subsequent modification with probe DNA (red curve), and hybridization with target DNA labeled with UCNPs (blue curve). The excitation light wavelength is 980 nm. The concentrations of target DNA are (a) 10−6 M, (b) 10−9 M, and (c) 10−13 M. (d) The percentage of photocurrent change ΔI/I after hybridization with target DNA at different concentrations.
Figure 3. Photocurrent responses measured in 0.1 M AA solution after the modification of CdS QDs (black curve), subsequent modification with probe DNA (red curve), and hybridization with target DNA labeled with UCNPs (blue curve). The excitation light wavelength is 980 nm. The concentrations of target DNA are (a) 10−6 M, (b) 10−9 M, and (c) 10−13 M. (d) The percentage of photocurrent change ΔI/I after hybridization with target DNA at different concentrations.
Sensors 24 00773 g003
Figure 4. (a) Photocurrent responses measured in 0.1 M AA solution after modification of CdS QDs (black), probe DNA (red), and target DNA (blue) without labeled UCNPs. The excitation wavelength is 980 nm. The concentration of target DNA is 10−6 M. (b) The percentage of photocurrent change after reaction with different concentration of target DNA without labeled UCNPs.
Figure 4. (a) Photocurrent responses measured in 0.1 M AA solution after modification of CdS QDs (black), probe DNA (red), and target DNA (blue) without labeled UCNPs. The excitation wavelength is 980 nm. The concentration of target DNA is 10−6 M. (b) The percentage of photocurrent change after reaction with different concentration of target DNA without labeled UCNPs.
Sensors 24 00773 g004
Figure 5. Schematic of the photo reabsorption (PR) and energy transfer (ET) between UCNPs reporter and CdS QDs acceptor. The upconversion emission peaks at 450 and 475 nm originated from 1D23F4 and 1G43H6 transitions of activator Tm3+, respectively.
Figure 5. Schematic of the photo reabsorption (PR) and energy transfer (ET) between UCNPs reporter and CdS QDs acceptor. The upconversion emission peaks at 450 and 475 nm originated from 1D23F4 and 1G43H6 transitions of activator Tm3+, respectively.
Sensors 24 00773 g005
Figure 6. Selectivity of the UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis: ΔI/I for the detection of target cDNA (10−6 M), two non-complementary ncDNA1 and ncDNA2 (10−6 M), and PBS solution (0.1 M, pH 7.4).
Figure 6. Selectivity of the UCNP-powered PEC bioanalysis: ΔI/I for the detection of target cDNA (10−6 M), two non-complementary ncDNA1 and ncDNA2 (10−6 M), and PBS solution (0.1 M, pH 7.4).
Sensors 24 00773 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, H.; Wei, W.; Song, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, Z.; Lin, P. Upconversion-Powered Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis for DNA Sensing. Sensors 2024, 24, 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030773

AMA Style

Liu H, Wei W, Song J, Hu J, Wang Z, Lin P. Upconversion-Powered Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis for DNA Sensing. Sensors. 2024; 24(3):773. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030773

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Hong, Weiwei Wei, Jiajun Song, Jin Hu, Zhezhe Wang, and Peng Lin. 2024. "Upconversion-Powered Photoelectrochemical Bioanalysis for DNA Sensing" Sensors 24, no. 3: 773. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030773

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop