A Detection Method of Novel Class for Radiation Source Individuals Based on Feature Distribution and Isolation Forest
Abstract
1. Introduction
- Radiation source signal features exhibit significant overlap, with substantial intra-class variability and limited inter-class separability, which complicates the modeling of accurate class boundaries.
- The absence of robust detection mechanisms within current SEI systems often results in missed or incorrect identification of novel-class and impairing electronic situational awareness.
2. Inter-Class and Intra-Class Variation in Radiation Source Individuals
2.1. Dataset Overview of the Radiation Source Individuals
2.2. Time-Domain Observation and Physical-Layer Analysis
2.3. Feature Space Visualization and Distribution Analysis
3. Proposed Method
3.1. Deep Feature Representation for Emitter Signal Embedding
3.2. Novel Class Detection Using iForest
- (1)
- Randomly select sample points from the dataset to form the required sample set .
- (2)
- Randomly select a feature and a segmentation value from the sample set . If the maximum and minimum values of all samples contained in the node on the feature are fmax and fmin, respectively, then should be randomly selected from the interval .
- (3)
- For each sample in the sample set, if the value of its feature is less than the segmentation value , then the sample is assigned to the left child node of node ; If it is greater than or equal to , then it is assigned to the right child node of the node.
- (4)
- Recursively repeat steps (2) and (3) for the left and right child nodes of node to generate an isolated binary tree. The process stops until the number of samples in the child nodes is insufficient, there is only a single sample, or the height of the tree reaches the preset maximum value, that is, any one of the following conditions is satisfied: the tree reaches the limited height; there is only one sample in the node; all the feature values of the samples in the node are the same.
- (5)
- Set a certain number of isolated binary trees and construct a detection model. For sample point , obtain the corresponding path length in each isolated binary tree, and use a specific formula to calculate the new class determination score for , in order to evaluate its likelihood of belonging to a new class individual.
4. Experiment Evaluation
4.1. Experiment Setup
4.2. Evaluation Results
4.2.1. Detection Performance of Novel-Class
4.2.2. False Positive Analysis for Known-Class Instances
4.2.3. Comparative Experiments
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Matuszewski, J. Radar signal identification using a neural network and pattern recognition methods. In Proceedings of the 2018 14th International Conference on Advanced Trends in Radioelecrtronics, Telecommunications and Computer Engineering (TCSET), Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine, 20–24 February 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 79–83. [Google Scholar]
- Talbot, K.I.; Duley, P.R.; Hyatt, M.H. Specific emitter identification and verification. Technol. Rev. 2003, 113, 113–130. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M.W.; Doherty, J.F. Nonlinearity estimation for specific emitter identification in multipath channels. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2011, 6, 1076–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X. A review of specific emitter identification based on phase space reconstruction. J. Radars 2023, 12, 713–737. [Google Scholar]
- Mahdavi, A.; Carvalho, M. A survey on open set recognition. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Engineering (AIKE), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 1–3 December 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 37–44. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, D.; Yu, Z.; Xie, J.; Zhang, H. Review on the Development of Few-Shot Specific Emitter Identification Technology. In Proceedings of the 2024 4th International Conference on Electronic Information Engineering and Computer Science (EIECS), Yanji, China, 27–29 September 2024; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2024; pp. 1061–1068. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, C.; Liu, J.; Li, Z.; Rui, G. Specific Emitter Identification Method for Limited Samples via Time–Wavelet Spectrum and Complex-Valued Neural Network. Sensors 2025, 25, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanna, S.; Karunaratne, S.; Cabric, D. Deep learning approaches for open set wireless transmitter authorization. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 26–29 May 2020; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Xu, R.; Wang, H.; Zhou, X. Research on Open-Set Recognition Methods for Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis. Sensors 2025, 25, 3019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rozsa, A.; Günther, M.; Rudd, E.M.; Boult, T.E. Facial attributes: Accuracy and adversarial robustness. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2019, 124, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kishan, K.C.; Tan, Z.; Chen, L.; Jin, M.; Han, E.; Stolcke, A.; Lee, C. OpenFEAT: Improving speaker identification by open-set few-shot embedding adaptation with transformer. In Proceedings of the ICASSP 2022—2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Singapore, 22–27 May 2022; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2022; pp. 7062–7066. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, C.; Huang, S.; Chen, S. Recent advances in open set recognition: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2020, 43, 3614–3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Al-Hazbi, S.; Hussain, A.; Sciancalepore, S.; Oligeri, G.; Papadimitratos, P. Radio frequency fingerprinting via deep learning: Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing (IWCMC), Ayia Napa, Cyprus, 27–31 May 2024; pp. 0824–0829. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, F.T.; Ting, K.M.; Zhou, Z. Isolation Forest. In Proceedings of the 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Pisa, Italy, 15–19 December 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Yeung, D.Y.; Chow, C. Parzen-window network intrusion detectors. In Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Quebec City, QC, Canada, 11–15 August 2002; Volume 4, pp. 385–388. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Carbonell, J.; Jin, C. Topic-conditioned novelty detection. In Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 23–26 July 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Rettig, L.; Khayati, M.; Cudré-Mauroux, P.; Piorkówski, M. Online anomaly detection over big data streams. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Santa Clara, CA, USA, 29 October–1 November 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, S.; Lavin, A.; Purdy, S.; Agha, Z. Unsupervised real-time anomaly detection for streaming data. Neurocomputing 2017, 262, 134–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grandvalet, Y.; Rakotomamonjy, A.; Keshet, J.; Canu, S. Support vector machines with a reject option. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2008, 21, 537–544. [Google Scholar]
- Cevikalp, H.; Uzun, B.; Salk, Y.; Saribas, H.; Köpüklü, O. From Anomaly Detection to Open Set Recognition: Bridging the Gap. Pattern Recognit. 2023, 138, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bendale, A.; Boult, T.E. Towards open set deep networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 26 June–1 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Rozsa, A.; Günther, M.; Boult, T.E. Adversarial robustness: Softmax versus openmax. arXiv 2017, arXiv:1708.01697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Ding, G.; Tang, B.; Chen, Y. Adaptive decomposition and extraction network of individual fingerprint features for specific emitter identification. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2024, 19, 8515–8528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, M.; Teng, J.; Liu, X.; Wang, W.; Huang, X. Few-shot Specific Emitter Identification: A Knowledge, Data, and Model-Driven Fusion Framework. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025, 20, 3247–3259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, Y.; Lin, Y.; Zha, H.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Gui, G.; Mao, S. Large-scale real-world radio signal recognition with deep learning. Chin. J. Aeronaut. 2022, 35, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Maaten, L.; Hinton, G. Visualizing Data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2008, 9, 2576–2605. [Google Scholar]
- Jolliffe, I.T. Principal component analysis. J. Mark. Res. 2002, 87, 513. [Google Scholar]
- Hendrycks, D.; Gimpel, K. A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networks. arXiv 2018, arXiv:1610.02136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruff, L.; Vandermeulen, R.A.; Görnitz, N.; Deecke, L.; Siddiqui, S.A.; Binder, A.; Müller, E.; Kloft, M. Deep One-Class Classification. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, Stockholm, Sweden, 10–15 July 2018; ICML: San Diego, CA, USA, 2018; Volume 80, pp. 4393–4402. [Google Scholar]
Category | Class 12 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sample | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
PCA1 | −9.94 × 10−4 | 8.23 × 10−4 | 12.66 × 10−4 | −19.41 × 10−4 | 12.04 × 10−4 |
PCA2 | −4.35 × 10−4 | −18.09 × 10−4 | −15.10 × 10−4 | −17.22 × 10−4 | 11.34 × 10−4 |
Category | Class 13 | ||||
Sample | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
PCA1 | 9.75 × 10−4 | −9.39 × 10−4 | 13.13 × 10−4 | −18.81 × 10−4 | 12.31 × 10−4 |
PCA2 | 13.10 × 10−4 | −4.35 × 10−4 | −14.17 × 10−4 | −16.10 × 10−4 | 12.74 × 10−4 |
Layer Type | Parameters | Activation |
---|---|---|
Input | 3000 × 2 × 1 | |
Conv2d | Kernel:20 × 1, Filters: 20, Stride:1 | ReLU |
Max pool2d | Pool size: 2 × 1, Stride:2 × 1 | |
Conv2d | Kernel:20 × 1, Filters: 40, Stride:1 | ReLU |
Max pool2d | Pool size: 2 × 1, Stride:2 × 1 | |
Conv2d | Kernel:20 × 1, Filters: 60, Stride:1 | ReLU |
Max pool2d | Pool size: 2 × 1, Stride:2 × 1 | |
Fullyconnected | 20 | |
Fullyconnected | I | |
Softmax |
Parameters | Value |
---|---|
Training environment | GPU |
MaxEpochs | 30 |
MiniBatchSize | 128 |
Initial learning rate | 0.001 |
Gradient threshold | 1 |
Optimization algorithm | Adam |
Experiments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy (%) | 95.6 | 95.8 | 98.0 | 92.5 | 96.5 | 90.2 | 96.6 | 93.5 |
Experiments | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accuracy (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Experiments | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNN | 50.8 | 56.9 | 57.0 | 56.4 | 54.0 | 52.5 | 55.3 | 56.5 |
K-means | 60.3 | 59.4 | 58.6 | 61.8 | 61.2 | 59.7 | 62.1 | 59.9 |
SVM | 68.1 | 69.8 | 68.8 | 69.2 | 70.3 | 69.3 | 69.7 | 68.6 |
MSP | 35.7 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 28.6 | 32.1 | 39.3 | 41.1 |
DeepSVDD | 93.0 | 85.7 | 89.3 | 96.4 | 89.3 | 96.4 | 92.8 | 91.1 |
OpenMax | 79.1 | 69.8 | 60.5 | 76.7 | 88.4 | 76.8 | 81.4 | 72.3 |
IDFIF | 95.6 | 95.8 | 98.0 | 92.5 | 96.5 | 90.2 | 96.6 | 93.5 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pan, Q.; Shi, L.; Feng, C.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Du, Y.; Chen, Z. A Detection Method of Novel Class for Radiation Source Individuals Based on Feature Distribution and Isolation Forest. Sensors 2025, 25, 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185747
Pan Q, Shi L, Feng C, Li Y, Wang C, Du Y, Chen Z. A Detection Method of Novel Class for Radiation Source Individuals Based on Feature Distribution and Isolation Forest. Sensors. 2025; 25(18):5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185747
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Qiang, Lei Shi, Changzhao Feng, Yinan Li, Congcong Wang, Yuefan Du, and Zhiyi Chen. 2025. "A Detection Method of Novel Class for Radiation Source Individuals Based on Feature Distribution and Isolation Forest" Sensors 25, no. 18: 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185747
APA StylePan, Q., Shi, L., Feng, C., Li, Y., Wang, C., Du, Y., & Chen, Z. (2025). A Detection Method of Novel Class for Radiation Source Individuals Based on Feature Distribution and Isolation Forest. Sensors, 25(18), 5747. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25185747