Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Scientific and Ethical Aspects of Identified Skeletal Series: The Case of the Documented Human Osteological Collections of the University of Bologna (Northern Italy)
Previous Article in Journal
AutoPoD-Mobile—Semi-Automated Data Population Using Case-like Scenarios for Training and Validation in Mobile Forensics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Osteological Collections of the National Museum in Brazil: Challenges and New Perspectives for a Historical Collection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Population-Inclusive Assigned-Sex-at-Birth Estimation from Skull Computed Tomography Scans

by
Samantha R. Kelley
1 and
Sean D. Tallman
2,*
1
Department of Anthropology, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA
2
Department of Anatomy & Neurobiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forensic Sci. 2022, 2(2), 321-348; https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020024
Submission received: 1 March 2022 / Revised: 22 March 2022 / Accepted: 24 March 2022 / Published: 26 March 2022

Abstract

Methods for estimating assigned, binary sex at birth from skeletonized remains have primarily been developed for specific population groups in the U.S. (e.g., African American, European American, Hispanic) and, thus, inherently rely on ancestry estimation as a foundational component for constructing the biological profile. However, ongoing discussions in forensic anthropology highlight pressing issues with ancestry estimation practices. Therefore, this research provides population-inclusive assigned-sex estimation models for cases where ancestry is not estimated or is truly unknown. The study sample (n = 431) includes 3D volume-rendered skull computed tomography scans from the novel New Mexico Decedent Image Database of African, Asian, European, Latin, and Native Americans. Five standard nonmetric traits were scored, and eighteen standard measurements were obtained. Binary logistic regressions and discriminant function analyses were employed to produce models and classification accuracies, and intraobserver reliability was assessed. The population-inclusive nonmetric and metric models produced cross-validated classification accuracies of 81.0–87.0% and 86.7–87.0%, respectively, which did not differ significantly from the accuracy of most population-specific models. Moreover, combined nonmetric and metric models increased accuracy to 88.8–91.6%. This study indicates that population-inclusive assigned-sex estimation models can be used instead of population-specific models in cases where ancestry is intentionally not estimated, given current concerns with ancestry estimation.
Keywords: forensic anthropology; United States; sexual dimorphism; assigned sex estimation; population-inclusive models; population affinity forensic anthropology; United States; sexual dimorphism; assigned sex estimation; population-inclusive models; population affinity

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kelley, S.R.; Tallman, S.D. Population-Inclusive Assigned-Sex-at-Birth Estimation from Skull Computed Tomography Scans. Forensic Sci. 2022, 2, 321-348. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020024

AMA Style

Kelley SR, Tallman SD. Population-Inclusive Assigned-Sex-at-Birth Estimation from Skull Computed Tomography Scans. Forensic Sciences. 2022; 2(2):321-348. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020024

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kelley, Samantha R., and Sean D. Tallman. 2022. "Population-Inclusive Assigned-Sex-at-Birth Estimation from Skull Computed Tomography Scans" Forensic Sciences 2, no. 2: 321-348. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020024

APA Style

Kelley, S. R., & Tallman, S. D. (2022). Population-Inclusive Assigned-Sex-at-Birth Estimation from Skull Computed Tomography Scans. Forensic Sciences, 2(2), 321-348. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci2020024

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop