Next Article in Journal
Comprehensive Utilization of Marine Microalgae for Enhanced Co-Production of Multiple Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Anti-Neuroinflammatory Agent, Restricticin B, from the Marine-Derived Fungus Penicillium janthinellum and Its Inhibitory Activity on the NO Production in BV-2 Microglia Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 18
Issue 9
10.3390/md18090466
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Endo-1,3-β-Glucanase from the Scallop Chlamys farreri

by
Zhijian Li
1,
Weizhi Liu
1,2 and
Qianqian Lyu
1,2,*
1
MOE Key Laboratory of Marine Genetics and Breeding, College of Marine Life Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266003, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266235, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2020, 18(9), 466; https://doi.org/10.3390/md18090466
Submission received: 26 August 2020 / Revised: 11 September 2020 / Accepted: 13 September 2020 / Published: 16 September 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Endo-1,3-β-glucanases derived from marine mollusks have attracted much attention in recent years because of their unique transglycosylation activity. In this study, a novel endo-1,3-β-glucanase from the scallop Chlamys farreri, named Lcf, was biochemically characterized. Unlike in earlier studies on marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases, Lcf was expressed in vitro first. Enzymatic analysis demonstrated that Lcf preferred to hydrolyze laminarihexaose than to hydrolyze laminarin. Furthermore, Lcf was capable of catalyzing transglycosylation reactions with different kinds of glycosyl acceptors. More interestingly, the transglycosylation specificity of Lcf was different from that of other marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases, although they share a high sequence identity. This study enhanced our understanding of the diverse enzymatic specificities of marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases, which facilitated development of a unique endo-1,3-β-glucanase tool in the synthesis of novel glycosides.

1. Introduction

Endo-1,3-β-glucanases (EC 3.2.1.39), also called laminarinases, can specifically hydrolyze β-1,3-glycosidic bonds in laminarin, whereas they hardly hydrolyze mix-linked β-1,3-1,4-glycosidic bonds in lichenin and cereal β-glucans [1]. The products of hydrolyzing laminarin, glucooligosaccharides, have been demonstrated to have a variety of biological activities, such as anti-diabetic activity [2], stimulating leukocytes to induce the production of cytokines [3], modulating lipid metabolism and intestinal microflora [4], and activating defense responses of plant cells [5,6]. Therefore, suitable endo-1,3-β-glucanases are determinants for the enzymatic preparation of well-defined glucooligosaccharides. In addition to their hydrolytic activity, some endo-1,3-β-glucanases exhibit transglycosylation activity, by which β-1,3-oligosaccharides (glycosyl donors) are transferred to hydroxyl compounds (glycosyl acceptors), generating new glycosidic bonds [7]. The glycosyl acceptors include monosaccharides, oligosaccharides, and other hydroxyl-containing compounds, such as alcohols and amino acids [1]. New bonds can be synthesized during transglycosylation, which is important for the synthesis of new glycosides [8]. Numerous oligosaccharides, glycolipids, and glycoproteins with novel biological activities have been discovered through glycosyltransferase synthesis [9]. Therefore, research on glycosidases has attracted increasing attention in recent years.
Endo-1,3-β-glucanases are widely distributed in archaea [10], bacteria [11,12,13], viruses [14], and eukaryota [15,16,17,18]. According to the amino acid sequences, endo-1,3-β-glucanases are classified into seven glycoside hydrolase (GH) families: GH16, GH17, GH55, GH64, GH81, GH128, and GH152. These endo-1,3-β-glucanases function in various life processes, such as the degradation of polysaccharides for energy utilization, cell development, and cell differentiation. For example, the β-1,3-glucanase-related protein from the red swamp crayfish, Procambarus clarkia, can be induced by bacteria, which is an important factor in the immune response [19]. The killer toxin secreted by the yeast Wickerhamomyces anomalus has also exhibited β-glucanase activity, which has potential for use in the symbiotic control of malaria [20]. Marine organisms are important sources for deriving new endo-1,3-β-glucanases [1], especially the digestive tracts of marine invertebrates, which are usually composed of various enzymes related to polysaccharide utilization. More interestingly, the endo-1,3-β-glucanases from marine organisms have demonstrated increased transglycosylation ability relative to those from terrestrial sources [1]. To date, a total of ten endo-1,3-β-glucanases have been determined to exhibit transglycosylation activity, two of which belong to the GH17 family [18,21], and the other eight belonging to the GH16 family. Among these eight endo-1,3-β-glucanases, one is derived from marine bacteria [22], and the remaining are all derived from marine mollusks [16,17,23,24,25,26,27]. Due to the presence of both hydrolytic activity and transglycosylation activity, marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases have distinctive advantages in the preparation of novel, useful glucooligosaccharides or glucans. For instance, soluble β-1,3-1,6-glucan obtained by transglycosylation of laminarin, using the endo-1,3-β-glucanase derived from the scallop Chlamys albidus, exhibits high immune stimulation, and bacteriostatic and antitumor activities [16]. The reported marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases have shown another interesting feature: these enzymes exhibit diverse specificities, and even their amino acid sequences have a high degree of similarity [1]. To reveal their unique specificities, more research on marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases is required.
Previously, in combination with proteomic analysis and the use of the whole-genome database, we identified a novel endo-1,3-β-glucanase from a hepatopancreatic extract of the Zhikong scallop (Chlamys farreri) [28]. In this study, the gene of the endo-1,3-β-glucanase (named Lcf) was cloned and expressed using the Brevibacillus (Bacillus brevis) expression system. After protein purification, the catalytic properties of Lcf were characterized, and the transglycosylation specificity was determined. This study enhanced our understanding of the marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Sequence Alignment between Lcf and Endo-1,3-β-Glucanases from GH16

Sequence alignment between Lcf and six characterized GH16 endo-1,3-β-glucanases was performed using ClustalW Multiple Alignment. These enzymes were derived from the marine mollusk Mizuhopecten yessoensis [29], terrestrial arthropod Tenebrio molitor [30], marine hot spring bacterium Thermotoga maritima [12], bacterium Zobellia galactanivorans [31] isolated from marine red algae, terrestrial bacterium Cellulosimicrobium cellulans [11], and terrestrial fungus Ustilago esculenta [32]. Sequence alignment indicated that Lcf shared 87.4% sequence identity with the endo-1,3-β-glucanases derived from the marine mollusk Mizuhopecten yessoensis. In contrast, Lcf shared only 23.6–41.3% sequence identity with the other endo-1,3-β-glucanases (Figure 1). This was consistent with the conclusion that endo-1,3-β-glucanases derived from marine mollusks have high homology [15,24].
Additionally, sequence alignment demonstrated the key residues involved in catalytic reactions and substrate binding. A previous study had demonstrated that two conserved glutamates in the pattern EXDX(X)E function in the catalytic reaction were a nucleophile and general acid/base, respectively [31]. In Lcf, the equivalent to the nucleophile was Glu150, whereas the general acid/base was Glu155 (Figure 1). In addition, the structures of the β-glucanase ZgLamAGH16 complex with oligo substrates has previously been solved (PDB ID: 4BOW) [31], providing knowledge of key residues involved in substrate binding. The complex structures of ZgLamAGH16 identified seven residues involved in substrate binding, five of which are conserved based on the sequence alignment. In Lcf, the equivalent to the conserved residues were Lys105, Trp130, Trp134, Asp152, and Trp145 (Figure 1).

2.2. Expression and Purification of Lcf

In a previous study, direct extraction of the enzyme from the digestive organs of marine mollusks was the general method used for collecting endo-1,3-β-glucanases [24,25,26]. However, the isolation of endo-1,3-β-glucanases from digestive organs is not only time-consuming, but is also limited by the source of marine mollusks. Therefore, we carried out the expression of Lcf in vitro using the Escherichia coli expression system and Bacillus brevis expression system. Although the recombinant proteins were detected in the supernatant of the cell lysis, they did not exhibit enzymatic activity, suggesting the occurrence of incorrect protein folding in the expression of Lcf in the E. coli expression system. Fortunately, recombinant Lcf with hydrolytic activity was detected successfully in the fermentation broth of Bacillus brevis. After a three-step purification, including ammonium sulfate salting out, hydrophobic chromatography, and ion exchange chromatography, about 12 mg of Lcf was extracted from 1 L of fermentation broth of Bacillus brevis. The molecular weight of Lcf was about 37 kDa, as shown in Figure 2.
Through the Bacillus brevis expression system, Lcf was expressed in vitro successfully, providing a more convenient method for the extraction of marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases. In addition, this method may facilitate performing further structural research, which will be important for understanding the unique transglycosylation activity of marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases.

2.3. Enzymatic Characterization of Lcf

A hydrolytic activity assay at various pH values indicated that Lcf exhibited the maximum hydrolytic activity at pH 6.0 (Figure 3a). Additionally, the assay at different temperatures demonstrated that the optimal temperature for Lcf was 44 °C (Figure 3b). When the incubation temperature was higher than 45 °C, the hydrolytic activity of Lcf decreased significantly (Figure 3c). The enzymatic activity of Lcf was abolished after pre-incubation of Lcf at 60 °C and 70 °C (Figure 3c). In addition, Lcf retained approximately 25% of the enzymatic activity with the addition of EDTA (Figure 3d), suggesting that metal ions might influence the enzymatic activity of Lcf, but are not essential for Lcf. Notably, the enzymatic activity of Lcf was increased by approximately three times in the presence of Mn2+. The enzymatic activity of Lcf was also enhanced by Fe3+, and the addition of Ca2+ seemed not to affect the enzymatic activity of Lcf. However, the enzymatic activity of Lcf was inhibited in the presence of Mg2+, Cu2+, and Zn2+, especially in the presence of Cu2+ (Figure 3d).
Furthermore, the kinetic parameters of Lcf towards laminarin were measured. The specific activity for Lcf was 1.67 U/mg, and its Km and Kcat values were 10.27 mg/mL and 1230.64 S−1, respectively.

2.4. Analyses of Hydrolytic Products and Transglycosylation Products

To test the hydrolytic products of Lcf, Thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis was carried out. As shown in Figure 4, both the laminarin and the laminarinexaose were hydrolyzed into several oligomers, confirming that Lcf acted in an endo-type mode. However, different cleavage efficiencies were observed. Lcf showed a more efficient cleavage rate toward laminarinexaose. After reaction for 1 min, hydrolysis products with a degree of polymerization (Dp) 1–5 were generated. These oligomeric products were further hydrolyzed into monomers and dimers as end-products (Figure 4). In contrast, laminarin was not hydrolyzed completely (Figure 4). Considering the fact that laminarins from Laminaria digitate have a branch degree of 7.68%, and these branches contain about 9.51% β-1,6-glycosidic bonds [33], the more complex structure and the longer chain of laminarins might lead to a lower cleavage rate for Lcf.
To explore the transglycosylation specificity of Lcf, the transglycosylation products were analyzed by MS. Laminarin has usually been selected as the substrate for transglycosylation reactions in previous studies [16,23,24]. However, Lcf showed a more efficient cleavage rate toward laminarinexaose than laminarin, as described above. Accordingly, the substrate we used in the transglycosylation reaction was laminarinexaose. Furthermore, the acceptors contained monosaccharides (methyl α-d-glucopyranoside and methyl β-d-glucopyranoside), alcohol (ethanol), polyols (glycerol and d-sorbitol), and amino acids with hydroxyl side chains (l-serine). As shown in Figure 5a, the methylated disaccharide, trisaccharide, and tetrasaccharide were detected in the presence of methyl α-d-glucopyranoside or methyl β-d-glucopyranoside, suggesting that the donors of glycosylation were glucose, laminaribiose, and laminaritriose. Transglycosylation products were also observed in the presence of the other acceptors (Figure 5c–f). In the presence of glycerol, five transglycosylation products were generated (Figure 5c). Similar to methyl α-d-glucopyranoside or methyl β-d-glucopyranoside, three transglycosylation products were observed in the presence of d-sorbitol (Figure 5d). However, only one transglycosylation product was detected using ethanol or l-serine as the acceptor (Figure 5e,f). Besides transglycosylation products, hydrolytic products, including glucose, G2, G3, G4, and G5, were detected. The m/z of each product in ESI-MS (+) is shown in Table 1.
The transglycosylation activity of O-glycoside hydrolases can be used for the synthesis of new glycosides, which has potential for the development of novel drugs and functional foods. For example, transglycosylation may function in the synthesis of glycosylated therapeutic antibodies and glycoside-specific antibody–drug conjugates [34]. Therefore, the diverse transglycosylation specificities of endo-1,3-β-glucanases have attracted much attention. As described above, Lcf exhibited transglycosylation activity towards different kinds of acceptors, which facilitated the synthesis of novel glycosides. Additionally, in the transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by the endo-1,3-β-glucanase from Mizuhopecten yessoensis, only a sorbitol-Glc3 product was detected when using d-sorbitol as an acceptor [24]. However, three transglycosylation products linked with sorbitol were observed after the transglycosylation reaction catalyzed by Lcf (Figure 5d). These findings demonstrated that the two endo-1,3-β-glucanases from mollusks exhibit different transglycosylation specificities, although they share a high sequence identity. The unique transglycosylation activity of Lcf towards sorbitol facilitates the development of glycoconjugates with intestinal functions, and noncariogenic sugars [35]. In sum, this study provided insights into novel endo-1,3-β-glucanases from marine mollusks, enhancing our understanding of the diverse enzymatic specificities of marine mollusk endo-1,3-β-glucanases.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. RNA Extraction and Gene Cloning

The scallops were purchased from the Nanshan seafood market in Qingdao. The hepatopancreas was dissected by hand from the scallop viscera. Then, the hepatopancreas was ground into powder in liquid nitrogen. Next, the total RNA was extracted from the powder using the Mollusc RNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA). A cDNA library of scallop hepatopancreas was constructed by reverse transcription, using the extracted total RNA as a template (RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Using the cDNA library as a template, a full-length gene of Lcf without the signal peptide was cloned using the following primers: a forward primer (5′-CGGGATCCGCAGGCTTCCGTGACGATTTCAC-3′) and a reverse primer (5′-CCGCTCGAGTCAATGAGGTATCATCTCTATGTAATC-3′). Target gene fragments were collected using the Gel Extraction Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA), and ligated into the shuttle vector pNCMO2 (Takara, Dalian, China) using the restriction enzymes BamHI and XhoI. Then, the ligation solution was transformed into E. coli JM109. Expression plasmids were extracted using the Plasmid Mini Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, GA, USA).

3.2. Protein Expression in Brevibacillus

The Brevibacillus (Bacillus brevis) expression system (Takara, Dalian, China) is a prokaryotic expression system that is particularly effective in the production of secretory proteins [36]. The expression plasmids were transformed into Brevibacillus-competent cells using the new Tris-PEG (NTP) method, as described in the protocol. Brevibacillus transformant cells were grown in MTNm solid medium (glucose 10 g/L, polypeptone 10 g/L, beef powder 5 g/L, yeast extract 2 g/L, FeSO4·7H2O 10 mg/L, MnSO4·4H2O 10 mg/L, ZnSO4·7H2O 1 mg/L, MgCl2·6H2O 4.1 g/L, and neomycin 10 mg/L, pH 7.0) at 37 °C. DNA sequencing was performed to confirm the recombinant Brevibacillus. Then, the recombinant Brevibacillus cells were cultured in TMNm liquid medium (i.e., MTNm medium without MgCl2) at 32 °C for 48 h. SDS-PAGE analysis indicated that Lcf was successfully secreted into the fermentation broth.

3.3. Protein Purification

As described above, the Brevibacillus transformant cells were cultured for 48 h, then the fermentation broth was harvested by centrifuging at 6000× g rpm for 5 min. To precipitate the enzymes, ammonium sulfate was slowly added to the fermentation broth to 60% saturation (0 °C). After 10 h, the precipitate was collected by centrifugation (12,000× g, 4 °C), followed by washing using ammonium sulfate solution (60% saturation, 0 °C). The resulting protein was re-dissolved in a Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM, pH 7.5) containing 15% saturation (0 °C) ammonium sulfate. Then, the protein was loaded onto Phenyl Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA), which were washed and eluted using Tris-HCl buffer (20 mM, pH 7.5) containing 15–0% saturation (0 °C) ammonium sulfate. After purification by the Phenyl Sepharose beads, the resulting protein was dialyzed into a sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.0). Next, the protein was loaded onto CM Sepharose beads (GE Healthcare), which were washed and eluted using sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.0) containing 0–0.5 M NaCl.

3.4. Hydrolytic Activity Assay

The hydrolytic activity of Lcf was determined by the modified DNS method [37]. The reaction mixture (200 μL), containing 0.1% (w/w) laminarin from Laminaria digitate dissolved in sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.6) and 20 μL purified Lcf, was incubated for 20 min at 37 °C. Then, 150 μL DNS was added to terminate the reaction. The resulting mixture was boiled for 5 min at 100 °C and measured at 520 nm. One unit (1 U) of hydrolytic activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to produce the reducing sugar equivalent to 1 μmol of glucose per minute under the above reaction conditions.
The optimal pH of Lcf was determined by measuring the hydrolytic activity at different pH conditions. The buffers (50 mM) used for this assay contained sodium acetate buffers (pH 4.5, 5.0 and 5.6), sodium phosphate buffers (pH 5.9, 6.4 and 6.9), and Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5 and 8.0). The effect of the temperature was measured at 15–65 °C in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, at pH 5.6. The above enzymatic activity was tested under standard conditions. To determine the thermal stability of Lcf, the residual hydrolytic activity of Lcf (dissolved in sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.6)) after incubation at different temperatures (4–70 °C) for 15 min was measured. The effect of metal ions was determined by measuring the activity with different metal ions (Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Fe3+, and EDTA) at 5 mM in 50 mM sodium acetate buffer, at pH 5.6. All the above assays were performed in triplicate.

3.5. TLC Assay

The products of Lcf degradation of laminarin and laminarihexaose (Megazyme) were generated as described above. The reaction mixture (200 μL) contained 0.1% (w/w) laminarin or laminarihexose dissolved in sodium acetate buffer (50 mM, pH 5.6) and 20 μL purified Lcf. At different times, 5 μL of reaction mixture were taken for TLC analysis. Samples were spotted on silica gel 60 F254 plates (Merck, Darmatadt, Germany), and separated in a solvent of 1-butanol/acetic acid/water (2:1:1, v/v). To visualize the products, the plate was sprayed with a reagent containing 2 g of diphenylamine, 2 mL of aniline, 1 mL of HCl, 10 mL of H3PO3, and 100 mL of acetone, and was heated at 100 °C for 10 min [38].

3.6. Transglycosylation Products Assay

To explore the transglycosalating ability of Lcf, several acceptors, including methyl α-d-glucopyranoside, methyl β-d-glucopyranoside, glycerol, d-sorbitol, ethanol, and L-serine, were involved in the transglycosylation reactions. Briefly, Lcf (0.02 U) was added into the mixture containing laminarihexaose (2 mg/mL) and an acceptor (2 mg/mL) dissolved in sodium acetate buffer (25 mM, pH 5.6). Then, the resulting mixture (200 μL) was incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. The reaction was terminated by the addition of an equal volume of 2.5% (v/v) aqueous ammonia. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected and detected using positive ion electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) (Agilent 6460 Triple Quad, Santa Clara, CA, USA).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.L. and W.L.; Investigation, Z.L.; Writing—Original draft preparation, Z.L. and Q.L.; Writing—Review and editing, Q.L.; Funding acquisition, Q.L. and W.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 41706151 and the National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2018YFC1406903.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sova, V.V.; Pesentseva, M.S. Glycosidases of marine organisms. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2013, 78, 746–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kim, Y.W.; Kim, K.H. Anti-diabetic activity of beta-glucans and their enzymatically hydrolyzed oligosaccharides from Agaricus blazei. Biotechnol. Lett. 2005, 27, 483–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hida, T.H.; Ishibashi, K. Cytokine induction by a linear 1,3-glucan, curdlan-oligo, in mouse leukocytes in vitro. Inflamm. Res. 2009, 58, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shimizu, J.; Oka, M. Effects of a partially hydrolyzed curdlan on serum and hepatic cholesterol concentration, and cecal fermentation in rats. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2002, 72, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Klarzynski, O.; Plesse, B. Linear beta-1,3 glucans are elicitors of defense responses in tobacco. Plant. Physiol. 2000, 124, 1027–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Li, J.; Zhu, L. Purification and characterization of a new endo-β-1,3-glucanase exhibiting a high specificity for curdlan for production of β-1,3-glucan oligosaccharides. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2014, 23, 799–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Vuong, T.V.; Wilson, D.B. Glycoside hydrolases: Catalytic base/nucleophile diversity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010, 107, 195–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Abdul Manas, N.H.; MdIllias, R. Strategy in manipulating transglycosylation activity of glycosyl hydrolase for oligosaccharide production. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 272–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cobucci-Ponzano, B.; Moracci, M. Glycosynthases as tools for the production of glycan analogs of natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 697–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ilari, A.; Fiorillo, A. Crystal structure of a family 16 endoglucanase from the hyperthermophile Pyrococcus furiosus-structural basis of substrate recognition. FEBS J. 2009, 276, 1048–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oda, M.; Inaba, S. Structural and thermodynamic characterization of endo-1,3-beta-glucanase: Insights into the substrate recognition mechanism. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Proteom. 2018, 1866, 415–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jeng, W.Y.; Wang, N.C. Crystal structures of the laminarinase catalytic domain from Thermotoga maritima MSB8 in complex with inhibitors: Essential residues for beta-1,3- and beta-1,4-glucan selection. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 45030–45040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Labourel, A.; Jam, M. Structural and biochemical characterization of the laminarinase ZgLamCGH16 from Zobellia galactanivorans suggests preferred recognition of branched laminarin. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2015, 71, 173–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, L.; Gurnon, J.R. Characterization of a β-1,3-glucanase encoded by chlorella virus PBCV-1. Virology 2000, 276, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Kozhemyako, V.B.; Rebrikov, D.V. Molecular cloning and characterization of an endo-1,3-β-d-glucanase from the mollusk Spisula sachalinensis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2004, 137, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kovalchuk, S.N.; Bakunina, I.Y. An endo-(1→3)-beta-d-glucanase from the scallop Chlamys albidus: Catalytic properties, cDNA cloning and secondary-structure characterization. Carbohydr. Res. 2009, 344, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kumagai, Y.; Ojima, T. Enzymatic properties and the primary structure of a beta-1,3-glucanase from the digestive fluid of the Pacific abalone Haliotis discus hannai. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 154, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Takeda, T.; Nakano, Y. Identification and enzymatic characterization of an endo-1,3-β-glucanase from Euglena gracilis. Phytochemistry 2015, 116, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cai, L.Q.; Meng, J.H. Identification of a crustacean β-1,3-glucanase related protein as a pattern recognition protein in antibacterial response. Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2018, 80, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cecarini, V.; Cuccioloni, M. Identification of a Killer Toxin from Wickerhamomyces anomalus with β-Glucanase Activity. Toxins 2019, 11, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Takashima, T.; Taku, T. Crystal structure and biochemical characterization of CJP38, a beta-1,3-glucanase and allergen of Cryptomeria japonica pollen. Mol. Immunol. 2019, 116, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Kusaykin, M.I.; Belik, A.A. A new recombinant endo-1,3-β-d-glucanase from the marine bacterium Formosa algae KMM 3553, Enzyme characteristics and transglycosylation products analysis. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Borriss, R.; Krah, M. Enzymatic synthesis of 4-methylumbelliferyl (1→3)-β-d-glucooligosaccharides-new substrates for β-1,3-1,4-d-glucanase. Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1455–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zakharenko, A.M.; Kusaykin, M.I. Catalytic properties and amino acid sequence of endo-1→3-β-d-glucanase from the marine mollusk Tapes literata. Biochemistry (Moscow) 2012, 77, 878–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pesentseva, M.S.; Kusaykin, M.I. Catalytic properties and mode of action of endo-(1→3)-β-d-glucanase and β-d-glucosidase from the marine mollusk Littorina kurila. Carbohydr. Res. 2008, 343, 2393–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zakharenko, A.M.; Kusaykin, M.I. Enzymatic and molecular characterization of an endo-1,3-β-d-glucanase from the crystalline styles of the mussel Perna viridis. Carbohydr. Res. 2011, 346, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kumagai, Y.; Inoue, A. Preparation of β-1,3-glucanase from scallop mid-gut gland drips and its use for production of novel heterooligosaccharides. Fish. Sci. 2008, 74, 1127–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lyu, Q.; Jiao, W. Proteomic analysis of scallop hepatopancreatic extract provides insights into marine polysaccharide digestion. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 34866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kovalchuk, S.N.; Sundukova, E.V. Purification, cDNA cloning and homology modeling of endo-1,3-beta-D-glucanase from scallop Mizuhopecten yessoensis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 143, 473–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Genta, F.A.; Bragatto, I. Purification, characterization and sequencing of the major beta-1,3-glucanase from the midgut of Tenebrio molitor larvae. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2009, 39, 861–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Labourel, A.; Jam, M. The beta-glucanase ZgLamA from Zobellia galactanivorans evolved a bent active site adapted for efficient degradation of algal laminarin. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 2027–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nakajima, M.; Yamashita, T. A novel glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoside hydrolase from Ustilago esculenta functions in beta-1,3-glucan degradation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5682–5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, Z.; Xiong, Y. Endo-beta-1,3-glucanase digestion combined with the HPAEC-PAD-MS/MS analysis reveals the structural differences between two laminarins with different bioactivities. Carbohydr. Polym. 2018, 194, 339–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tang, F.; Wang, L.X. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of glycoengineered IgG antibodies and glycosite-specific antibody-drug conjugates. Nat. Protoc. 2017, 12, 1702–1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kurakake, M.; Amai, Y. Characteristics of an beta-N-Acetylhexosaminidase from Bacillus sp. CH11, Including its Transglycosylation Activity. J. Food Sci. 2018, 83, 1208–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yashiro, K.; Lowenthal, J.W. High-level production of recombinant chicken interferon-gamma by Brevibacillus choshinensis. Protein Expr. Purif. 2001, 23, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Lyu, Q.; Wang, S. Structural insights into the substrate-binding mechanism for a novel chitosanase. Biochem. J. 2014, 461, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Qin, Z.; Yang, S.; Zhao, L.; You, X.; Yan, Q.; Jiang, Z. Catalytic Mechanism of a Novel Glycoside Hydrolase Family 16 “Elongating” beta-Transglycosylase. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 1666–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g001 550
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of characterized GH16 β-1,3-glucanases from different organisms. The identical residues are highlighted in black, and similar residues are shaded in gray. The two key catalytic residues conserved in GH16 endo-1,3-β-glucanases are marked with triangles. For β-glucanase ZgLamAGH16, the residues involved in substrate binding are marked with closed circles and stars. The residues marked with closed circles are conserved in these endo-1,3-β-glucanases, but the two residues marked with stars are not conserved. The GeneBank accession numbers of the present endo-1,3-β-glucanases are: Chlamys farreri: AMN92714.1 (Lcf); Mizuhopecten yessoensis: AAW34372.1; Tenebrio molitor: ACS36221.1; Thermotoga maritima: AAD35118.1; Zobellia galactanivorans: CAZ96583.1 (PDB ID: 4BOW); Cellulosimicrobium cellulans: AAC38290.1; and Ustilago esculenta: BAM29293.1.
Figure 1. Sequence alignment of characterized GH16 β-1,3-glucanases from different organisms. The identical residues are highlighted in black, and similar residues are shaded in gray. The two key catalytic residues conserved in GH16 endo-1,3-β-glucanases are marked with triangles. For β-glucanase ZgLamAGH16, the residues involved in substrate binding are marked with closed circles and stars. The residues marked with closed circles are conserved in these endo-1,3-β-glucanases, but the two residues marked with stars are not conserved. The GeneBank accession numbers of the present endo-1,3-β-glucanases are: Chlamys farreri: AMN92714.1 (Lcf); Mizuhopecten yessoensis: AAW34372.1; Tenebrio molitor: ACS36221.1; Thermotoga maritima: AAD35118.1; Zobellia galactanivorans: CAZ96583.1 (PDB ID: 4BOW); Cellulosimicrobium cellulans: AAC38290.1; and Ustilago esculenta: BAM29293.1.
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g001
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g002 550
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified Lcf.
Figure 2. SDS-PAGE analysis of the purified Lcf.
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g002
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of pH, temperature, and metal ions on Lcf enzymatic activity and the thermostability of Lcf. (a) The effect of pH on Lcf activity. The optimal pH was determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of Lcf at pH 4.5, 5.0, 5.6, 5.9, 6.4, 6.9, 7.5, and 8.0, at 37 °C. (b) The effect of temperature on Lcf activity. The optimal temperature was determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of Lcf at 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, 45 °C, 55 °C, and 65 °C. (c) The thermostability of Lcf. The activity of Lcf was measured at 37 °C after pre-incubation at 4–70 °C for 15 min. (d) The effect of metal ions on Lcf activity. The activity of Lcf was measured in the presence of various metal ions (5 mM).
Figure 3. Effect of pH, temperature, and metal ions on Lcf enzymatic activity and the thermostability of Lcf. (a) The effect of pH on Lcf activity. The optimal pH was determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of Lcf at pH 4.5, 5.0, 5.6, 5.9, 6.4, 6.9, 7.5, and 8.0, at 37 °C. (b) The effect of temperature on Lcf activity. The optimal temperature was determined by measuring the enzymatic activity of Lcf at 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C, 45 °C, 55 °C, and 65 °C. (c) The thermostability of Lcf. The activity of Lcf was measured at 37 °C after pre-incubation at 4–70 °C for 15 min. (d) The effect of metal ions on Lcf activity. The activity of Lcf was measured in the presence of various metal ions (5 mM).
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g003
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g004 550
Figure 4. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of the hydrolysis products of laminarin and laminarihexaose using glucose (G) as control.
Figure 4. Thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis of the hydrolysis products of laminarin and laminarihexaose using glucose (G) as control.
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g004
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g005 550
Figure 5. ESI-MS spectrometry analysis of the transglycosylation products. Laminarihexaose was used as the substrate or the donor. A total of six acceptors were tested in the transglycosylation reaction, including methyl α-d-glucopyranoside (a), methyl β-d-glucopyranoside (b), glycerol (c), d-sorbitol (d), ethanol (e), and l-Serine (f). The m/z of the ion peaks [M + Na]+ of the products are indicated by dots (hydrolysis products) and rhombuses (transglycosylation products). The m/z of the products are summarized in Table 1.
Figure 5. ESI-MS spectrometry analysis of the transglycosylation products. Laminarihexaose was used as the substrate or the donor. A total of six acceptors were tested in the transglycosylation reaction, including methyl α-d-glucopyranoside (a), methyl β-d-glucopyranoside (b), glycerol (c), d-sorbitol (d), ethanol (e), and l-Serine (f). The m/z of the ion peaks [M + Na]+ of the products are indicated by dots (hydrolysis products) and rhombuses (transglycosylation products). The m/z of the products are summarized in Table 1.
Marinedrugs 18 00466 g005
Table
Table 1. Summary of m/z of the ion peaks [M + Na]+ corresponding to hydrolysis and transglycosylation products.
Table 1. Summary of m/z of the ion peaks [M + Na]+ corresponding to hydrolysis and transglycosylation products.
SymbolCompoundm/z
GGlucose203.2
G2Laminaribiose365.4
G3Laminaritriose527.3
G4Laminaritetraose689.3
G5Laminaripentaose851.2
Me-α-G2Methyl α-d-Glc2379.4
Me-α-G3Methyl α-d-Glc3541.4
Me-α-G4Methyl α-d-Glc4703.2
Me-β-G2Methyl β-d-Glc2379.4
Me-β-G3Methyl β-d-Glc3541.3
Me-β-G4Methyl β-d-Glc4703.2
Glycerol-GGlycerol-Glc1227.3
Glycerol-G2Glycerol-Glc2439.4
Glycerol-G3Glycerol-Glc3601.2
Glycerol-G4Glycerol-Glc4763.2
Glycerol-G5Glycerol-Glc5924.9
Sorbitol-GSorbitol-Glc1367.4
Sorbitol-G2Sorbitol-Glc2529.3
Sorbitol-G3Sorbitol-Glc3691.2
ET-G2Ethanol-Glc2393.3
Ser-GSerine-Glc1290.2

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Z.; Liu, W.; Lyu, Q. Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Endo-1,3-β-Glucanase from the Scallop Chlamys farreri. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18090466

AMA Style

Li Z, Liu W, Lyu Q. Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Endo-1,3-β-Glucanase from the Scallop Chlamys farreri. Marine Drugs. 2020; 18(9):466. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18090466

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Zhijian, Weizhi Liu, and Qianqian Lyu. 2020. "Biochemical Characterization of a Novel Endo-1,3-β-Glucanase from the Scallop Chlamys farreri" Marine Drugs 18, no. 9: 466. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18090466

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop