Next Article in Journal
Actinomycin V Induces Apoptosis Associated with Mitochondrial and PI3K/AKT Pathways in Human CRC Cells
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of Thermally Stable Collagens from the Scales of Lizardfish (Synodus macrops)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Functional Feeds to Tackle Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Stress: Physiological Responses under Acute Stressful Handling Conditions

1
Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR), University of Porto, Terminal de Cruzeiros do Porto de Leixões, Av. General Norton de Matos, s/n, 4450-208 Matosinhos, Portugal
2
Departament of Biology, Faculty of Ciências, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, Building FC4, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
3
Portuguese Institute for Sea and Atmosphere (IPMA), Olhão Pilot Aquaculture Station, Av. 5 de Outubro, s/n, 8700-305 Olhão, Portugal
4
SORGAL, Oils and Feedd Society, S.A., Estrada Nacional 109 Lugar da Pardala, 3880-728 São João de Ovar, Portugal
5
B2E Blue Bioeconomy CoLab—Colabrtive Laboratory, Av. Liberdade, s/n, 4450-718 Leça da Palmeira, Portugal
6
Fish Immunology and Patology Group, Center for Animal Health Research (CISA, INIA), Carretera de Algete a El Casar, s/n, 28130 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(11), 598; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110598
Submission received: 28 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 21 October 2021

Abstract

:
Marine algae are recognised sources of bioactive compounds that have attracted great interest as nutritional supplements for aquaculture fish. Intensive rearing conditions often expose fish to husbandry-related stressors, rendering fish more susceptible to disease and reducing production yields. The present work evaluated the potential of two marine algae extracts (Fucus vesiculosus and Nannochloropsis gaditana) as nutritional supplements to mitigate stress effects in meagre (Argyrosomus regius) exposed to an acute handling stress (AS). A plant-based diet was used as a control, and three other diets were prepared, which were similar to the control diet but supplemented with 1% of each algal extract or a combination of the two extracts (0.5% each). The effects of supplemented diets on stress biomarkers, antioxidant enzyme activities, and immune response were analysed in fish exposed to AS after 4 weeks of feeding. Supplemented diets did not affect growth performance but the inclusion of F. vesiculosus promoted higher feed efficiency, as compared to the control group. Dietary algal extracts supplementation reduced plasma glucose levels, increased white blood cell counts, and reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory genes when compared with the control. N. gaditana supplementation led to a reduction in hepatic antioxidant enzyme activity and glutathione levels, while F. vesiculosus supplementation increased muscle glutathione reductase activity and reduced lipid peroxidation. These findings support the potential of algal extracts as nutraceuticals in aquafeeds to enhance the ability of fish to cope with husbandry-related stressful conditions and ultimately improve fish health and welfare.

1. Introduction

Marine alga-derived molecules have been a focal point for research due to their immunotherapeutic potential to several organisms, including fish. In fact, these were shown to have an active role in cell protection against oxidative damage [1] in the enhancement of fish immune responses [2,3], and have exhibited antiviral and antibacterial properties [3,4,5], which makes them promising functional ingredients of prophylactic agents. Microalgae are well-known sources of high-quality proteins, pigments, long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LC-PUFA), vitamins, polyphenols, flavonoids, and other bioactive substances [6]. On the other hand, macroalgae are sources of proteins, polysaccharides, phenolic compounds, and carotenoids [7,8]. In fish, dietary supplementation with Nannochloropsis gaditana promoted growth performance [9] and enhanced immune responses [10,11]. Similarly, dietary supplementation with Fucus vesiculosus improved fish immune and antioxidant responses and resistance against pathogens [12,13], and also exhibited genoprotective properties [14,15]. Physiological stress is a major concern in aquaculture production, as it negatively impacts the welfare and overall production yield of fish [16]. Under intensive aquaculture conditions, farmed fish are weakened by several acute and chronic stress conditions, such as crowding, water quality, temperature fluctuation, handling, transportation, or confinement, thus becoming more susceptible to diseases [17,18]. Stress mitigation and increased disease resistance have become a priority for the aquaculture industry, since diseases are responsible for heavy economic losses due to mass mortality, poor product quality, and the costs associated with chemotherapy. One strategy relies on the use of natural sources of substances with therapeutic interest that mitigate stress-negative effects and boost host defence mechanisms, thus preventing farmed fish diseases [19]. With this desideratum, the search for algae’s secondary metabolites with immunotherapeutic properties has gained increased attention [6,20].
Until now, most studies conducted with fish tested whole algae rather than algal extracts [12,21,22]. This can compromise the potential efficiency of bioactive compounds as algae have rigid cell walls that are hard to digest, particularly by carnivorous fish, therefore limiting the availability of several active compounds. The use of algal extracts offers the possibility to directly convey the active compounds, thus overcoming the mentioned problems [23].
Meagre (Argyrosomus regius), the model used in the present work, is an emerging fish species in Mediterranean aquaculture, which has been dominated by European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) and gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) production, thus leading to market saturation and the depreciation of economic value [24]. Meagre is a carnivorous, fast-growing species that presents itself as a promising candidate for aqua-culture diversification due to its high organoleptic characteristics and good market acceptance [25,26]. However, due to its recent cultivation history, it is still sub-adapted to captivity and, therefore, presents stress-related issues.
The present work aimed at evaluating extracts from N. gaditana and F. vesiculosus as nutritional supplements in aquafeeds for meagre that are capable of alleviating stress-induced negative effects on fish health and welfare. These extracts were selected based on their previously demonstrated antioxidant potential [23] and were incorporated in balanced diets for meagre in order to potentially reduce the acute physiological stress that results from grading/sampling.

2. Results

Fish promptly accepted the experimental diets and no significant mortality was recorded between the groups. During the 4-week experimental period, feed intake and fish growth were not affected by dietary treatment, but FE was lower with the diet that included NG, and higher with the diet that included FV (Table 1).

2.1. Plasma Metabolite

Compared to unstressed fish (NS), AS increased plasma glucose and cortisol levels (Table 2). Dietary supplementation with FV extract lowered plasmatic glucose levels in both the NS and AS groups, while supplementation with NG extract lowered glucose levels only in the NS group. Plasma lactate was lower in AS than in NS fish, regardless of dietary treatment. Moreover, dietary supplementation with either FV or NG extracts decreased plasma lactate levels, but such an effect was not observed with the combined supplementation of the two extracts.

2.2. Hematologic Parameters

The RBC count was higher in AS than in NS fish (Table 3). Similarly, thrombocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils were higher, while lymphocytes were lower in AS fish. Regardless of stress conditions, neutrophils increased with the combined supplementation of FV and NG extracts. Diet supplemented with FV extract increased overall WBC count, while NG extract decreased hematocrit in NS fish. MCV was not affected by dietary treatment or stress conditions.

2.3. Gene Expression

Compared to the NS groups, AS did not affect TNF-α and IL-1β expression in fish fed the extract-supplemented diets, while in the control groups, both genes were upregulated under AS (Figure 1). Further, dietary algal extract supplementation led to a decreased expression of TNF-α and IL-1β under AS. IL-10 expression was only affected by dietary supplementation with FV extract. With this diet, IL-10 was downregulated in AS fish, in comparison to both the NS group and to groups fed the other diets.
HSP70 and HSP90 expression were not affected by stress or dietary treatment, except in fish fed the diet with NG supplementation, which showed an upregulation of HSP90 under AS (Figure 2).

2.4. Oxidative Stress

AS increased the activity of hepatic GPX, GR, and G6PDH. Hepatic SOD, GR, and G6PDH activities (Table 4) were lower in fish fed the diets supplemented with NG extract regardless of stress condition. Hepatic oxidative enzyme activity was not affected by FV extract, except in AS fish, which showed decreased SOD activity.
Hepatic GSSG, OSI, and LPO were not affected by diet composition or stress conditions (Table 5). GSH levels were also not affected by diet composition but were higher in fish fed the NS extract. tGSH decreased in AS fish when fed diets with NG extract supplementation, compared to both NS fish and AS fish fed the other diets.
Muscle SOD activity was not affected by diet composition or stress conditions (Table 6). Dietary supplementation with NG extract increased CAT activity and decreased G6PDH activity. Fish submitted to AS presented increased CAT activity and decreased GPX activity. In NS fish, but not in AS fish, diet FV supplementation led to higher GR activity compared to fish fed diets without supplementation. Dietary supplementation with FV alone resulted in higher GR activity, while dietary supplementation with FV and NG did not affect GR, irrespective of stress conditions. On the other hand, compared to the NS condition, GR activity decreased under AS in fish fed with the FV-supplemented diet.
Muscle GSH was not affected by diet or stress conditions (Table 7). Compared to the NS fish, muscle tGSH, GSSG, OSI, and LPO were higher in fish submitted to AS. Additionally, dietary supplementation with FV resulted in decreased LPO levels.

3. Discussion

In fish farming, capture, handling, crowding, confinement, and transport are common practices that affect the stress responses of teleosts [27,28,29]. Over time, these stressors have cumulative and long-term effects on fish [18]. Physiological stress has been reported to have severe negative consequences on growth performance as well as disease resistance [16,30]. Functional feeds constitute a tool to mitigate those effects. In this study, NG and FV extracts were incorporated, as antioxidant additives, in diets for meagre, with the aim of mitigating aquaculture-associated acute handling stress effects.
In fish, increased plasma catecholamines and cortisol are the first systemic response to stress. High cortisol levels induce metabolic processes and lead to increased levels of circulating glucose and lactate. In the present study, these plasma stress indicators varied significantly under the effect of AS, while plasmatic levels of glucose and cortisol increased, and lactate levels decreased, in response to the AS. As for the effect of the dietary treatment, algal extract supplementation did not affect plasma cortisol levels, but glucose and lactate were significantly reduced, particularly in fish fed diets that were supplemented with either isolated NG or FV extracts (N1F0 and N0F1 diets). Under stress, fish are known to increase energy metabolism as a coping mechanism and, since glucose acts as the main energy source, plasma glucose levels are expected to increase as a means of promptly providing the required extra energy [31]. However, in the presence of feed additives of vegetable origin, insulin action has been reported to be enhanced, increasing the uptake of glucose by cells, and decreasing plasma glucose levels in rohu, Labeo rohita fingerlings [32] and in rats [33], which may also have occurred in the present work with dietary algal extracts, despite stress conditions. Similarly, a decrease in fish glucose levels caused by Padina astraulis methanolic extracts was previously reported in Mugil cephalus with supplementation levels as low as 0.5% [34]. As for lactate, higher blood lactate levels occur under stress, as a consequence of increased respiratory activity in the muscle under anaerobic conditions [35,36]. Thus, elevated blood lactate is an indirect indicator of stress, which reflects the imposition of severe exercise in which the tissue requirement for oxygen exceeds the supply [36]. However, in this study, the opposite was verified. Even though the disturbance of blood lactate levels was only moderate (ranging from 2.6 to 3.9 mmol L−1), suggesting that the degree of respiratory stress experienced was not excessive, the findings that dietary algal supplementation led to lower lactate levels may reveal a relationship between dietary algal extract supplementation and muscle performance and fatigue. Moreover, previous studies in mammals have linked the nutritional status to fluctuations in levels of lactate under physical stress [37,38]. While nutrient-deficient diets led to higher lactate levels under physical stress, the opposite was verified when a nutritionally balanced diet was supplied [37,38], similarly to the present study, which may partially explain the results obtained herein. Further studies are, however, necessary to better understand the role of dietary algal extracts and their bioactive compounds on lactate metabolism under stressful conditions.
Hematological parameters can be used to monitor the health status of fish in response to changes related to nutrition, water quality, stress, and diseases [39]. The increasing of RBC has been reported as a strategy to enhance the capacity of blood to carry oxygen under a high energy demand condition, such as stress [40,41]. Accordingly, in this study, RBC was increased under stress conditions, but was unaffected by dietary supplementation.
Fish leukocyte modulation under stress conditions follows a typical profile, consisting of decreased numbers of circulating lymphocytes due to their migration from the blood to tissues, and the inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation by stress hormones [42,43]. Additionally, monocyte and neutrophil numbers increase since they are recruited to circulation, with higher numbers of circulating neutrophils being characteristic of acute stress situations [44]. The fish included in this study presented a typical leukogram in response to an acute handling of stress, and dietary extract supplementation did not modulate the leukocyte response. However, the increase in total WBC observed in fish fed with the FV-supplemented diets could be a result of the improved immune response, as shown with other feed additives, such as vitamin C, white button mushroom and nucleotides [45,46,47]. Hence, FV extract supplementation may enhance fish stress and disease resistance under stressful conditions.
Hematocrit variation can be indicative of stress due to changes in blood dilution or concentration that are related to osmoregulatory disorders [48]. In the present study, however, hematocrit was not affected by stress. A reduction in hematocrit was, however, observed in fish fed the diet supplemented with NG, but only in NS fish. Normally, these findings would suggest that NG supplementation presents adverse effects on red blood cell synthesis/destruction or cell volume [49]. In the present study, however, no other hematological parameters were affected by NG supplementation, and thus, the cause of reduced hematocrit cannot be ascertained. Further studies should be conducted on the hematological effects of NG supplementation to discard possible toxicity effects.
Several studies previously showed that stress can be immunosuppressive, and hence, may be detrimental to fish health [50]. Acute stressors have been reported to either increase or decrease the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and TNF-α, depending on the stimulus applied, and the tissue and species considered [51,52]. These apparently conflicting results may also be related to a delayed stress-induced variation of these pro-inflammatory cytokines, and the lack of a well-established peak response [50]. Cytokines are important signalling molecules of the immune system that intervene in both innate and acquired responses and are modulated by diverse stimuli [53]. While TNF-α and IL-1β are key pro-inflammatory cytokines that are mainly produced by active macrophages, IL-10 acts as an anti-inflammatory cytokine by downregulating the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [53]. In the present work, expression of the pro-inflammatory genes TNF-α and IL-1β was induced under AS conditions in fish fed the control diet. However, fish fed the extract-supplemented diets were able to keep the pro-inflammatory cytokines’ expression levels close to the basal levels, indicating that the exacerbated inflammatory responses induced by AS can be controlled by the dietary algal extract supplementation. Similar effects were also observed by [54], who showed that lipid extracts from macroalgae inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines on LPS-stimulated human THP-1 macrophages. Previous reports linked reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation to pro-inflammatory cytokines’ action, specifically that of TNF-α, via their mutual influence within a positive feedback loop [55,56]. In light of the results obtained by [23] and those reported herein (Table 1), dietary NG and FV supplementation could be responsible for keeping cytokine expression levels in AS fish similar to those in NS fish through their direct influence on ROS. Furthermore, phenolic compounds, including terpenoids, anthocyanins and phenolic rich extracts, have been reported to inhibit the nuclear translocation of nuclear factor-κB, which is involved in the activation of several pro-inflammatory genes, but further investigations are needed to unveil the exact mechanisms of action [57,58]. Thus, by preventing an excessive pro-inflammatory response, which in turn, leads to increased susceptibility to secondary infections [59], dietary supplementation of phenolic-rich extracts (FV and NG) could be used as a valuable prophylactic immunotherapy strategy in aquaculture facilities, as suggested by [60].
HSPs are a super-family of highly conserved intracellular proteins found in all organisms that are involved in protein folding and transport, receptor binding, and proteolysis [61]. Several HSPs, including HSP70 and HSP90, were reported to increase in concentration in response to a variety of abiotic stressors [62]. In this study, however, no significant differences were observed in HSP70 expression between NS and AS fish. Fish responses to external stimuli differ greatly between fish species. It is unclear why different fish species exposed to stress have varied responses in terms of HSP expression. A possible explanation could be that the level of constitutive expression of HSP is already high enough to overcome the potentially harmful effects of stressors, such as increased temperature, as long as it remains within the normal physiological range for fish [63]. Similarly, other studies failed to detect differences in HSP expression in fish exposed to common aquaculture stressors, including handling stress [64,65], suggesting that further studies are needed to understand the relation between stressors and HSP expression.
Nonetheless, compared to the NS group, under AS, a trend towards increased HSP90 expression in fish fed with diet was noticed. Such results suggest that NG inclusion, under stressful conditions, promotes cell protection against damage induced by stress, as HSP90 actively intervenes in the immune, apoptotic, and inflammatory processes [61].
In the present work, fish under AS showed increased hepatic and muscle antioxidant enzyme activity, likely as a response to increased ROS production caused by AS. In an extreme situation, if ROS levels surpass fish antioxidant defences, oxidative stress occurs, ultimately leading to cellular damage [66]. Moreover, the antioxidant enzyme activity was much higher in the liver than in the muscle, reflecting the higher metabolic rate of the liver, and its central role in energy metabolism and detoxification. Indeed, the liver is a central organ for the development of antioxidant defences [67,68]. The current results are in line with previous reports that were based on largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) and common carp (Cyprinus carpio) being exposed to short-term stresses [67,69]. Regarding dietary effect, while FV extract did not affect hepatic enzyme activity, it increased GR activity in the muscle. NG extract decreased SOD and GR activity in the liver and increased CAT activity in the muscle. G6PDH was reduced in both tissues in fish fed with NG-supplemented diets. Contrarily, studies in other species report that functional feed additives, such as marine algae and their bioactive compounds (e.g., β-glucan and fucoidan), increase antioxidant enzyme activity under stressful conditions [1,51,70]. Furthermore, the decreased antioxidant enzyme activity in fish fed the diet containing NG extract could be linked to the extract’s ability to directly scavenge ROS, as previously reported by [23], thereby minimizing the need for antioxidant enzymes to detoxify ROS.
Lipid peroxidation (LPO) is a well-established marker for oxidative tissue damage, and therefore, a reliable indicator of oxidative stress [71]. In the present study, despite variations in oxidative stress enzyme activity, hepatic LPO levels were not affected by stress or diet composition. In contrast, in the muscle, LPO was higher under the AS condition and decreased in fish fed the diet that included FV extract, suggesting a protective role of FV extract against oxidative stress, particularly in relation to stressful events. These results are in line with what was expected since polyphenolic compounds derived from the brown macroalgae methanol extracts, such as the FV extract used herein (Table 1), have been reported to decrease lipid peroxidation [72,73]. The algal extracts used in the present work were optimised with the use of hydro-alcoholic solvents (methanol and ethanol) in previous work [23] and selected based on their phenolic content and antioxidant potential, and therefore, were expected to have an effect on overall performance, antioxidant status, immune responses and disease resistance, as reviewed by [74]. Although no effects were observed in terms of growth performance, antioxidant status and immune and humoral responses were found to be modulated by supplementation with phenolic-rich extracts. However, the exact mechanisms of action of the extract have yet to be understood.
In conclusion, this study showed that meagre that were subjected to acute handling stress exhibited reduced plasma lactate and increased plasma glucose and cortisol levels. AS also induced hepatic expression of pro-inflammatory genes as well as the activity of hepatic and muscle oxidative stress enzymes. On the other hand, dietary supplementation of NG extract reduced oxidative stress responses and FV extract reduced lipid peroxidation, while both extracts reduced inflammatory responses. By reducing potential ROS damage and minimizing the inflammatory response induced by acute handling stress, supplementation with phenolic-rich extracts (FV and NG) could provide valuable immunotherapeutic tools in terms of the responses of fish under stressful conditions.
As NG and FV extracts induce different actions in fish, further studies on dietary supplementation with both extracts should be conducted to determine the possible mechanisms of dietary algae in the alleviation of fish stress. Moreover, future studies should focus on how to take advantage of the beneficial effects of each extract, ultimately providing a valuable resource to protect against stressful conditions.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Algae Extracts’ Obtention

Solvent mixtures and the extraction methodology were selected based on previous results obtained on the antioxidant activity and phenolic content of micro and macroalgae extracts [23]. Algal extracts were prepared from freeze-dried biomass from F. vesiculosus (FV) obtained from Alga+ (Ílhavo, Portugal) and N. gaditana (NG) obtained from Buggy Power S.L. (San Pedro del Pinatar, Murcia, Spain). Briefly, 67 g of freeze-dried algal biomass was milled and then mixed with 1.3 L of ethanol/water (80:20 v/v; for NG) or methanol/water (50:50 v/v; for FV). The solvent mixtures and the mixtures were then vortexed and incubated for 30 min with continuous orbital agitation, in the dark, at room temperature. Each mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 10,000× g at 4 °C and the supernatant was collected. This procedure was repeated three times and supernatants from successive extractions were pooled. The extracts were then filtered through Whatman 1 filter paper and subsequently subjected to solvent evaporation in a Rotavapor (BUCHI R-100, Flawil, Switzerland), at <40 °C, to remove the organic solvent, and freeze-dried to remove the remaining water.

4.2. Experimental Diets

Four experimental diets were formulated to contain 48% protein and 18% lipids (Table 8). A practical plant-based diet was used as a control (N0F0) and three other diets were formulated similarly to the control, but were also supplemented with 1% NG (diet N1F0), 1% FV (diet N0F1), or 0.5% NG + 0.5% FV (diet N1F1). Diet designations denote presence (1)/absence (0) of the extracts. Dry ingredients were weighed and well mixed. To facilitate the inclusion of NG extract in the diets, the dry extract was dissolved in absolute ethanol, well mixed with the dry ingredients, and the mixture was dried in an oven at 40 °C until complete ethanol evaporation. Finally, oil and water were added. Diets were then pelleted (California Pellet Mill, Crawfordsville, IN, USA), dried in an oven at 40 °C for 48 h, and then stored in a freezer (−20 °C) until use. Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets is shown in Table 8.

4.3. Ethics Statement

Experiments were directed by accredited scientists, with category C status, following the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations (FELASA) recommendations and conducted according to the European Union directive 2010/63/EU on the protection of animals for scientific purposes.

4.4. Feeding Trial, Sampling and Acute Handling Stress Procedures

Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) juveniles were obtained from Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA), Olhão, Portugal, and acclimated for 3 weeks to the experimental conditions, during which they were fed a commercial diet with 44% protein and 18% lipids (Aquasoja Sustainable Feed, Sorgal, Ovar, Portugal). The trial was conducted at the Marine Zoology Station, Porto University, Portugal, in a thermo-regulated recirculating water system with 12 tanks of 100 L capacity, supplied with a continuous flow of filtered seawater (35 g L−1). A 12 h:12 h light: dark photoperiod was adopted, oxygen was maintained near saturation (7 mg L−1), and the temperature was set to 22 °C ± 1 °C. Thirteen fish with 28.8 ± 0.1 g average body weight were allocated in each tank and the diets were randomly assigned to triplicate tanks. Fish were hand-fed to apparent visual satiation twice a day, 6 days per week, for 4 weeks.
By the end of the feeding period, fish were fasted for 18 h before sampling and 3 fish were randomly sampled from each tank (n = 9) The remaining fish were bulk weighed under slight anaesthesia with ethylene glycol monophenyl ether (0.3:1000 v/v; Merck, Whitehouse Station, USA). Blood samples were immediately collected from the caudal vein using heparinised syringes and centrifuged for 10 min at 10,000× g to obtain plasma, which was stored at −20 °C until analyses. Fish were then euthanised by severing the nerve cord, weighed, and the liver and lateral muscle were collected, before being snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until oxidative status analyses were performed. Muscle and head-kidney were also collected, preserved overnight in RNA Later at 4 °C, and then stored at −80 °C until gene expression analyses were performed. These were henceforth designated the No Stress (NS) group.
The acute handling stress trial consisted of exposing the remaining fish to an acute handling stress through handling. For that purpose, fish were chased in the tanks for 1 min every 10 min for 1 h, and then caught with a nylon net and confined in a bucket for 10 min. Three fish were then sampled as described above and henceforth designated the acute handling stress (AS) group.

4.5. Chemical Analyses

The proximate composition of diets was analysed using the following procedures according to [75]: dry matter, after drying in an oven at 105 °C until constant weight; ash, by incineration in a muffle furnace at 450 °C for 16 h; crude protein (N × 6.25), by the Kjeldahl method, after acid digestion using a Kjeltec digestion and distillation system (Tecator Systems; models 1015 and 1026, respectively); lipids, by petroleum ether extraction in a SoxTec system (Tecator Systems; extraction unit model 1043 and service unit model 1046); gross energy content was determined using an oxygen bomb calorimeter (Parr 1281 Calorimeter, Parr Instrument Company, Moline, IL, USA).

4.6. Plasma Biochemistry

Commercial kits were used for the determination of cortisol (EIAHCOR, Invitrogen, CA, USA), lactate and glucose (Ref. 1001330 and 1001191, respectively; Spinreact, Girona, Spain). All plasmatic parameters were analysed using a colorimetric reaction, and absorbance was measured in a Multiskan GO microplate reader (Model 5111 9200; Thermo Scientific, Nanjing, China).

4.7. Hematological Analysis

Fresh heparinised blood was used for hematocrit (Ht) determination and blood cell counts. Ht, total red blood cells (RBC), white blood cells (WBC), and differential WBC counts were determined as described by [76].

4.8. Gene Expression Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from samples of muscle and head kidney, using the Direct-zol™ RNA MiniPrep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Samples were homogenised in 600 μL TRI Reagent using the Precellys 24 homogeniser (Bertin Technologies, Montigny-Le-Bretonneux, France), in a 2 mL vial and then centrifuged at 13,000× g for 1 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and mixed with an equal volume of absolute ethanol (PanReac, Barcelona, Spain). The mixture was transferred into a spin column (supplied with the kit) and centrifuged for 1 min at 13,000× g, at 4 °C. The RNA was then washed and subjected to DNase treatment, following the kit manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, RNA was eluted in 50 µL of DEPC-treated water and subjected to electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels to confirm the integrity of the 28S and 18S rRNA bands. RNA quality was measured using the μDrop™ Plate (Thermo Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France) in a Multiskan GO Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Courtaboeuf, France).
cDNA was generated from 1 µg of total RNA using the NZY First-Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (NZYTech, Lisbon, Portugal), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The product of the first strand cDNA synthesis was stored at −20 °C until further analysis.
Gene expression of heat shock proteins 70 (HSP70) and 90 (HSP90) in the muscle and the immune-related proinflammatory cytokines, interleukine-1-beta (IL1-β) and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and the anti-inflammatory cytokine, interleukine-10 (IL-10), in the head-kidney were determined using real-time quantitative PCR (CFX Connect™ Real-Time System, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). cDNA amplification was performed using specific PCR primers, retrieved from [77] and designed in the present work (Table 9). To assess HSP gene expression, and since no nucleotide sequences were available in the literature for meagre, identification and primer design were performed for the genes of interest. First, the nucleotide sequences of genes of interest from species that are closely related to meagre were blasted using the NCBI database. To identify conserved regions, the nucleotide sequence was aligned using MAFFT alignment software (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/mafft/ accessed in 1 January 2020). Then, based on the open reading frame (ORF), primers were designed on the identified conserved regions (primer length 20–23 bp; product size 100–250 bp; Tm 60 ± 1 °C; G/C ≤ 50%) and their quality determined using the ThermoFisher Scientific Multiple Primer Analyser software (https://www.thermofisher.com/pt/en/home/brands/thermo-scientific/molecular-biology/molecular-biology-learning-center/molecular-biology-resource-library/thermo-scientific-web-tools/multiple-primer-analyzer.html; accessed in 1 January 2020). To determine primer efficiency, seven serial two-fold dilutions of a cDNA mix of all samples were prepared, and efficiency was calculated from the slope of the regression line of the quantification cycle (Ct) versus the log 10 of the cDNA different dilutions [78]. Real-time qPCR reactions were performed using 3.5 μL of ultrapure water (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany), 5 μL of SsoAdvanced Universal SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), 0.5 μL of each primer and 1 μL cDNA from each sample, adding up to a final volume reaction of 10 μL. The different transcripts were amplified using technical triplicates per sample, under the following conditions: 95 °C for 30 s for denaturation, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 58 °C for 30 s. A melting curve analysis was performed to verify that only specific amplification occurred, and no primer dimers were amplified. The relative expression of each transcript was normalised to the selected housekeeping gene (elongation-factor 1-alpha, EF-1α), due to its expression stability in the intestine and calculated using the Pfaffl method [78].

4.9. Enzyme Activity

Liver and muscle samples were diluted to 1:9 and 1:3, respectively, and homogenised in ice-cold 100 mM Tris–HCl buffer containing 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 at pH 7.8, using Precellys® Evolution homogeniser (Bertin Corp., Rockville, MD, USA). Homogenates were centrifuged at 30,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C and the resultant supernatants were separated in aliquots and stored at −80 °C for further enzyme assays.
Superoxide dismutase (SOD, EC 1.15.1.1), catalase (CAT, EC 1.11.1.6), glutathione peroxidase (GPX, EC 1.11.1.9), glutathione reductase (GR, EC 1.6.4.2), and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH, EC 1.1.1.49) activities were determined in liver and muscle, as described by [76]. Protein concentration in homogenates was determined by the Bradford method [79] using BioRad Protein Assay Dye Reagent (Ref. 5000006) with bovine albumin as standard. All enzymatic activity analyses were carried out at 37°C. A Multiskan GO microplate reader (Model 5111 9200; Thermo Scientific, Nanjing, China) was used to monitor the changes in absorbance.
For SOD, one unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme necessary to produce 50% inhibition of the ferricytochrome C reduction rate. All other enzyme activities were expressed as units (CAT) or milliunits (G6PDH, GPX, and GR) per milligram of hepatic soluble protein (specific activity). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme required to transform 1 μmol of substrate per minute under the assay conditions.

4.10. Lipid Peroxidation (LPO)

Malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration was used as a marker of LPO levels in the liver and muscle. In the presence of thiobarbituric acid, MDA reacts producing coloured thiobarbituric acid-reacting substances (TBARS) that were measured as described in [76] The results were expressed as nanomoles MDA per gram of wet tissue, calculated from a calibration curve.

4.11. Total and Oxidised Glutathione (tGSH and GSSG)

Liver and muscle samples were homogenised (1:9 and 1:3, respectively) in an ice-cold solution of 1.3% 5-sulfosalicylic acid (w/v) and 10 mM HCl using Precellys 24 homogeniser (Bertin Technologies). All procedures were carried out on ice to avoid glutathione oxidation. Homogenates were centrifuged at 14,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and the resulting supernatants stored at −80 °C. Total glutathione (tGSH) and oxidised glutathione (GSSG) were measured as described by [80]. Standard curves of reduced glutathione (GSH) and GSSG were used for tGSH and GSSG calculations, respectively. GSH levels were calculated by subtracting GSSG from tGSH values. The oxidative stress index (OSI) was calculated through the following equation:
OSI = 100 × (2 × GSSG)/tGSH

4.12. Statistical Analysis

Before analyses, data were tested for normality and homogeneity using Shapiro–Wilk and Levene tests, respectively. The experimental unit considered was the fish (n = 9). Growth and feed utilization was analysed by a two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), with N. gaditana and F. vesiculosus as factors. Data on plasma biochemistry, haematology and oxidative stress were analysed by three-way ANOVA with N. gaditana, F. vesiculosus, and Stress as factors. When significant interactions between two factors were observed, data were analysed by one-way ANOVA to disclose each factor’s main effects. Plasma cortisol and gene expression data were not normal nor homogeneous and could not be normalised. Thus, differences between different diets for each condition (AS or NS) were analysed using the Kruskal–Wallis test followed by multiple pairwise comparison. Within each dietary treatment (N0F0, N0F1, N1F0 and N1F1), differences between AS and NS groups were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U non-parametric test. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics v25 software (IBM Corp.).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.O.-T., P.E. and A.C.; methodology, A.C.; validation, A.C.; formal analysis, M.M. and C.S.; investigation, M.M., C.S., F.C., F.F. and C.C.; resources, E.M. and P.P.; data curation, M.M. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, C.S., F.C., C.C., F.F., A.C., A.O.-T., E.M., P.P., P.D.-R., I.G. and P.E.; visualization, A.C. and P.E.; supervision, A.O.-T., A.C., P.E. and P.D.-R.; project administration, A.C.; funding acquisition, A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by U. Porto and SOJA DE PORTUGAL, grant number PP-IJUP2019-SOJA DE PORTUGAL-14 This research was also partially supported by the FCT, grant numbers POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007621 and PTDC/CVT-WEL/5207/2014.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All procedures were approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of the Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research (CIIMAR) under project license ORBEA-CIIMAR 30-2019, conducted by trained scientists (following FELASA category C recommendations) in full compliance with the Portuguese legislation and the European Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and the European Union Council, and carried out in a registered installation (N16091.UDER).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by U. Porto and SOJA DE PORTUGAL through project PP-IJUP2019-SOJA DE PORTUGAL-14. This research was partially supported by the Strategic Funding to UID/Multi/04423/2019 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007621) and PTDC/CVT-WEL/5207/2014 through national funds provided by FCT. M. Monteiro, C. Castro and I. Guerreiro were supported by grants SFRH/BD/114995/2016, SFRH/BPD/114942/2016 and SFRH/BPD/114959/2016, respectively, from the FCT and the FSE, under the POCI program. F. Coutinho received a research contract under the FCT project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-029540 (PTDC/BIAOUT/29540/2017). A. Couto and P. Enes have scientific employment contracts that are supported by national funds through the FCT. The authors would also like to thank BUGGYPOWER for the kind supply of the Nannochloropsis gaditana biomass used in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sony, N.M.; Ishikawa, M.; Hossain, M.S.; Koshio, S.; Yokoyama, S. The effect of dietary fucoidan on growth, immune functions, blood characteristics and oxidative stress resistance of juvenile red sea bream, Pagrus major. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 45, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. del Rocío Quezada-Rodríguez, P.; Fajer-Ávila, E.J. The dietary effect of ulvan from Ulva clathrata on hematological-immunological parameters and growth of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Safavi, S.V.; Kenari, A.A.; Tabarsa, M.; Esmaeili, M. Effect of sulfated polysaccharides extracted from marine macroalgae (Ulva intestinalis and Gracilariopsis persica) on growth performance, fatty acid profile, and immune response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 4021–4035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hellio, C.; La Broise, D.D.; Dufosse, L.; Le Gal, Y.; Bourgougnon, N. Inhibition of marine bacteria by extracts of macroalgae: Potential use for environmentally friendly antifouling paints. Mar. Environ. Res. 2001, 52, 231–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pérez, M.; Falqué, E.; Domínguez, H. Antimicrobial Action of Compounds from Marine Seaweed. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Yaakob, Z.; Ali, E.; Zainal, A.; Mohamad, M.; Takriff, M. An overview: Biomolecules from microalgae for animal feed and aquaculture. J. Biol. Res. 2014, 21, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Meena, D.K.; Das, P.; Kumar, S.; Mandal, S.C.; Prusty, A.K.; Singh, S.K.; Akhtar, M.S.; Behera, B.K.; Kumar, K.; Pal, A.K.; et al. Beta-glucan: An ideal immunostimulant in aquaculture (a review). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 39, 431–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, W.-W.; Duan, X.-J.; Huang, H.-L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, B.-G. Evaluation of 28 marine algae from the Qingdao coast for antioxidative capacity and determination of antioxidant efficiency and total phenolic content of fractions and subfractions derived from Symphyocladia latiuscula (Rhodomelaceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2007, 19, 97–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Carballo, C.; Mateus, A.P.; Maya, C.; Mantecón, L.; Power, D.M.; Manchado, M. Microalgal extracts induce larval programming and modify growth and the immune response to bioactive treatments and LCDV in Senegalese sole post-larvae. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2020, 106, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Carballo, C.; Pinto, P.I.S.; Mateus, A.P.; Berbel, C.; Guerreiro, C.C.; Martinez-Blanch, J.F.; Codoñer, F.M.; Mantecon, L.; Power, D.M.; Manchado, M. Yeast β-glucans and microalgal extracts modulate the immune response and gut microbiome in Senegalese sole (Solea senegalensis). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 92, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cerezuela, R.; Guardiola, F.A.; Meseguer, J.; Esteban, M.Á. Enrichment of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) diet with microalgae: Effects on the immune system. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 38, 1729–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Araújo, M.; Rema, P.; Sousa-Pinto, I.; Cunha, L.M.; Peixoto, M.J.; Pires, M.A.; Seixas, F.; Brotas, V.; Beltrán, C. Dietary inclusion of IMTA-cultivated Gracilaria vermiculophylla in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) diets: Effects on growth, intestinal morphology, tissue pigmentation, and immunological response. J. Appl. Phycol. 2016, 28, 679–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Traifalgar, R.F.M.; Corre, V.L.; Serrano, A.E. Efficacy of dietary immunostimulants to enhance the immunological responses and Vibriosis resistance of juvenile Penaeus monodon. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2013, 8, 340–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Marques, A.; Marçal, R.; Pereira, V.; Pereira, P.; Mieiro, C.; Guilherme, S.; Marques, C.; Santos, M.A.; Pereira, R.; Abreu, H.; et al. Macroalgae-enriched diet protects gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) against erythrocyte population instability and chromosomal damage induced by aqua-medicines. J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 1477–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pereira, V.; Marques, A.; Gaivão, I.; Rego, A.; Abreu, H.; Pereira, R.; Santos, M.A.; Guilherme, S.; Pacheco, M. Marine macroalgae as a dietary source of genoprotection in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) against endogenous and exogenous challenges. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part—C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2019, 219, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wysocki, L.E.; Davidson, J.W.; Smith, M.E.; Frankel, A.S.; Ellison, W.T.; Mazik, P.M.; Popper, A.N.; Bebak, J. Effects of aquaculture production noise on hearing, growth, and disease resistance of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Aquaculture 2007, 272, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Bricknell, I.; Dalmo, R.A. The use of immunostimulants in fish larval aquaculture. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2005, 19, 457–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schreck, C. Accumulation and long-term effects of stress in fish. In The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare; Moberg, G., Mench, J.A., Eds.; CABI: Wallingford, Oxon, UK, 2000; Volume 1, pp. 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  19. Oliva-Teles, A. Nutrition and health of aquaculture fish. J. Fish Dis. 2012, 35, 83–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Holdt, S.L.; Kraan, S. Bioactive compounds in seaweed: Functional food applications and legislation. J. Appl. Phycol. 2011, 23, 543–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Valente, L.M.P.; Gouveia, A.; Rema, P.; Matos, J. Evaluation of three seaweeds Gracilaria bursa-pastoris, Ulva rigida and Gracilaria cornea as dietary ingredients in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) juveniles. Aquaculture 2006, 252, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Castro, C.; Coutinho, F.; Iglesias, P.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Couto, A. Chlorella sp. and Nannochloropsis sp. Inclusion in Plant-Based Diets Modulate the Intestine and Liver Antioxidant Mechanisms of European Sea Bass Juveniles. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Monteiro, M.; Santos, R.A.; Iglesias, P.; Couto, A.; Serra, C.R.; Gouvinhas, I.; Barros, A.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P.; Díaz-Rosales, P. Effect of extraction method and solvent system on the phenolic content and antioxidant activity of selected macro- and microalgae extracts. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 32, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wagner, B.A.; Young, J.A. Seabass and seabream farmed in the Mediterranean: Swimming against the tide of market orientation. Supply Chain Manag. 2009, 14, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Monfort, M.C. Present Market Situation And Prospects of Meagre (Argyrosomus Regius), as an Emerging Species in Mediterranean Aquaculture; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  26. Quéméner, L. Meagre (Argyrosomus regius): Biology, fisheries, market and rearing potential. In Le Maigre Commun (Argyrosomus Regius): Biologie, Pêche, Marché et Potentiel Aquacole; IFREMER: Plouzané, France, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. PagEes, T.; Gomez, E.; Suner, O.; Viscor, G.; Tort, L. Effects of daily management stress on haematology and blood rheology of the gilthead seabream. J. Fish Biol. 1995, 46, 775–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Varsamos, S.; Flik, G.; Pepin, J.F.; Bonga, S.E.W.; Breuil, G. Husbandry stress during early life stages affects the stress response and health status of juvenile sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006, 20, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Eissa, N.; Wang, H.-P. Transcriptional stress responses to environmental and husbandry stressors in aquaculture species. Rev. Aquac. 2016, 8, 61–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rottmann, R.W.; Francis-Floyd, R.; Durborow, R. The Role of Stress in Fish Disease; SRAC Publication number 474; Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lupatsch, I.; Santos, G.A.; Schrama, J.W.; Verreth, J.A.J. Effect of stocking density and feeding level on energy expenditure and stress responsiveness in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture 2010, 298, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sahu, S.; Das, B.K.; Pradhan, J.; Mohapatra, B.C.; Mishra, B.K.; Sarangi, N. Effect of Magnifera indica kernel as a feed additive on immunity and resistance to Aeromonas hydrophila in Labeo rohita fingerlings. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2007, 23, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lee, S.H.; Lee, H.J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, B.-W.; Cha, B.S.; Kang, E.S.; Ahn, C.W.; Park, J.S.; Kim, H.J.; Lee, E.Y.; et al. Korean Red Ginseng (Panax ginseng) Improves Insulin Sensitivity in High Fat Fed Sprague-Dawley Rats. Phyther. Res. 2012, 26, 142–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Akbary, P.; Shahraki, N. Effect of dietary supplementation of Padina astraulis (Hauk, 1887) extract on biochemical response and digestive enzyme activities of grey mullet, Mugil cephalus (Linnaeus, 1758). Iran. J. Fish. Sci. 2020, 19, 2118–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Driedzic, W.R.; Hochachka, P.W. Metabolism in Fish During Exercise. Fish Physiol. 1978, 7, 503–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dando, P.R. Lactate metabolism in fish. J. Mar. Biol. Ass. UK 1969, 49, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. De Palo, E.F.; Gatti, R.; Cappellin, E.; Schiraldi, C.; De Palo, C.B.; Spinella, P.; De Palo, E.F.; Gatti, R.; Cappellin, E.; Schiraldi, C.; et al. Plasma lactate, GH and GH-binding protein levels in exercise following BCAA supplementation in athletes. Amino Acids 2001, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Baltaci, A.K.; Ozyurek, K.; Mogulkoc, R.; Kurtoglu, E.; Ozkan, Y.; Celik, I. Effects of Zinc Deficiency and Supplementation on the Glycogen Contents of Liver and Plasma Lactate and Leptin Levels of Rats Performing Acute Exercise. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2003, 96, 227–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fazio, F. Fish hematology analysis as an important tool of aquaculture: A review. Aquaculture 2019, 500, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Witeska, M. Erythrocytes in teleost fishes: A review. Zool. Ecol. 2013, 23, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Eslamloo, K.; Akhavan, S.R.; Fallah, F.J.; Henry, M.A. Variations of physiological and innate immunological responses in goldfish (Carassius auratus) subjected to recurrent acute stress. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 37, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Davis, A.K.; Maney, D.L.; Maerz, J.C. The use of leukocyte profiles to measure stress in vertebrates: A review for ecologists. Funct. Ecol. 2008, 22, 760–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seibel, H.; Baßmann, B.; Rebl, A. Blood Will Tell: What Hematological Analyses Can Reveal About Fish Welfare. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 616955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Grzelak, A.K.; Davis, D.J.; Caraker, S.M.; Crim, M.J.; Spitsbergen, J.M.; Wiedmeyer, C.E. Stress Leukogram Induced by Acute and Chronic Stress in Zebrafish. Comp. Med. 2017, 67, 263–269. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dawood, M.A.O.; Eweedah, N.M.; El-Sharawy, M.E.; Awad, S.S.; Van Doan, H.; Paray, B.A. Dietary white button mushroom improved the growth, immunity, antioxidative status and resistance against heat stress in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 2020, 523, 735229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tahmasebi-Kohyani, A.; Keyvanshokooh, S.; Nematollahi, A.; Mahmoudi, N.; Pasha-Zanoosi, H. Effects of Dietary Nucleotides Supplementation on Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) Performance and Acute Stress Response. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 38, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Affonso, E.G.; da Costa Silva, E.; Tavares-Dias, M.; de Menezes, G.C.; de Carvalho, C.S.M.; da Silva Santiago Nunes, É.; Ituassú, D.R.; Roubach, R.; Ono, E.A.; Fim, J.D.I.; et al. Effect of high levels of dietary vitamin C on the blood responses of matrinxã (Brycon amazonicus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol.—A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2007, 147, 383–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Morgan, J.D.; Sakamoto, T.; Grau, E.G.; Iwama, G.K. Physiological and respiratory responses of the Mozambique tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) to salinity acclimation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.—A Physiol. 1997, 117, 391–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roche, H.; Boge, G. Fish blood parameters as a potential tool for identification of stress caused by environmental factors and chemical intoxication. Mar. Environ. Res. 1996, 41, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tort, L. Stress and immune modulation in fish. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2011, 35, 1366–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zeng, L.; Wang, Y.H.; Ai, C.X.; Zhang, J.S. Differential effects of β-glucan on oxidative stress, inflammation and copper transport in two intestinal regions of large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea under acute copper stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 165, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dhabhar, F.S. Stress-induced augmentation of immune function—The role of stress hormones, leukocyte trafficking, and cytokines. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2002, 16, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zou, J.; Secombes, C. The Function of Fish Cytokines. Biology 2016, 5, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Robertson, R.; Guihéneuf, F.; Bahar, B.; Schmid, M.; Stengel, D.; Fitzgerald, G.; Ross, R.; Stanton, C. The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Algae-Derived Lipid Extracts on Lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-Stimulated Human THP-1 Macrophages. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 5402–5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Blaser, H.; Dostert, C.; Mak, T.W.; Brenner, D. TNF and ROS Crosstalk in Inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2016, 26, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Fischer, R.; Maier, O. Interrelation of oxidative stress and inflammation in neurodegenerative disease: Role of TNF. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 610813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Vendrame, S.; Klimis-Zacas, D. Anti-inflammatory effect of anthocyanins via modulation of nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling cascades. Nutr. Rev. 2015, 73, 348–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Castrillo, A.; de las Heras, B.; Hortelano, S.; Rodríguez, B.; Villar, A.; Boscá, L. Inhibition of the Nuclear Factor κB (NF-κB) Pathway by Tetracyclic Kaurene Diterpenes in Macrophages: Specific effects on NF-kβ-inducing kinase activity and on the coordinate activation of ERK and p38 MAPK. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 15854–15860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Wendelaar Bonga, S.E. The Stress Response in Fish. Physiol. Rev. 1997, 77, 591–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Monteiro, M.; Lavrador, A.; Santos, R.A.; Rangel, F.; Iglesias, P.; Tárraga, M.; Couto, A.; Serra, C.S.; Tafalla, C.; da Costa, E.; et al. Evaluation of the potential of marine algae extracts as a source of functional ingredients using zebrafish as animal model for aquaculture. Mar. Biotechnol. 2021, 23, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Roberts, R.J.; Agius, C.; Saliba, C.; Bossier, P.; Sung, Y.Y. Heat shock proteins (chaperones) in fish and shellfish and their potential role in relation to fish health: A review. J. Fish Dis. 2010, 33, 789–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Iwama, G.K.; Thomas, P.T.; Forsyth, R.B.; Vijayan, M.M. Heat shock protein expression in fish. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1998, 8, 35–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zakhartsev, M.; de Wachter, B.; Johansen, T.; Pörtner, H.O.; Blust, R. Hsp70 is not a sensitive indicator of thermal limitation in Gadus morhua. J. Fish Biol. 2005, 67, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vijayan, M.M.; Pereiralv, C.; Forsyth’, R.B.; Kennedy, C.J.; Iwama’, G.K. Handling stress does not affect the expression of hepatic heat shock protein 70 and conjugation enzymes in rainbow trout treated with β-naphthoflavone. Life Sci. 1997, 61, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Zarate, J.; Bradley, T.M. Heat shock proteins are not sensitive indicators of hatchery stress in salmon. Aquaculture 2003, 223, 175–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Seifried, H.E.; Anderson, D.E.; Fisher, E.I.; Milner, J.A. A review of the interaction among dietary antioxidants and reactive oxygen species. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2007, 18, 567–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lushchak, V.I.; Bagnyukova, T.V.; Lushchak, O.V.; Storey, J.M.; Storey, K.B. Hypoxia and recovery perturb free radical processes and antioxidant potential in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) tissues. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2005, 37, 1319–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Van der Oost, R.; Beyer, J.; Vermeulen, N.P.E. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: A review. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2003, 13, 57–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yang, S.; Yan, T.; Wu, H.; Xiao, Q.; Fu, H.M.; Luo, J.; Zhou, J.; Zhao, L.L.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.Y.; et al. Acute hypoxic stress: Effect on blood parameters, antioxidant enzymes, and expression of HIF-1alpha and GLUT-1 genes in largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2017, 67, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Shi, Q.; Wen, X.; Zhu, D.; Aweya, J.J.; Li, S. Protective effects of Sargassum horneri against ammonia stress in juvenile black sea bream, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. J. Appl. Phycol. 2019, 31, 1445–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gutteridge, J.M.C. Lipid peroxidation and antioxidants as biomarkers of tissue damage. Clin. Chem. 1995, 41, 1819–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, T.; Jónsdóttir, R.; Ólafsdóttir, G. Total phenolic compounds, radical scavenging and metal chelation of extracts from Icelandic seaweeds. Food Chem. 2009, 116, 240–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Maqsood, S.; Benjakul, S.; Abushelaibi, A.; Alam, A. Phenolic Compounds and Plant Phenolic Extracts as Natural Antioxidants in Prevention of Lipid Oxidation in Seafood: A Detailed Review. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 1125–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ahmadifar, E.; Yousefi, M.; Karimi, M.; Raieni, R.F.; Dadar, M.; Yilmaz, S.; Dawood, M.A.O.; Abdel-Latif, H.M.R. Benefits of Dietary Polyphenols and Polyphenol-Rich Additives to Aquatic Animal Health: An Overview. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2020, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. AOAC Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International; Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997.
  76. Guerreiro, I.; Pérez-Jiménez, A.; Costas, B.; Oliva-Teles, A. Effect of temperature and short chain frutooligosaccharides supplementation on the hepatic oxidative status and immune response of turbot (Scophthalmus maximus). Fish. Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 40, 570–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Milne, D.J. Characterisation of the immune response in two new species for fish aquaculture, Argyrosomus regius and Seriola dumerili. PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pfaffl, M.W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001, 29, e45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Pérez-Jiménez, A.; Peres, H.; Rubio, V.C.; Oliva-Teles, A. The effect of hypoxia on intermediary metabolism and oxidative status in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) fed on diets supplemented with methionine and white tea. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part. C Comp. Pharmacol. 2012, 155, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Expression of immune-related genes in the head-kidney of meagre under no-stress (NS) and acute-handling-stress (AS) conditions, after four weeks of feeding with the experimental diets. (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-1β and (C) IL-10. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Different letters indicate significant differences between dietary treatments ((A) p = 0.004; (B) p = 0.001; (C) p = 0.006). * indicate differences between NS and AS fish within each dietary treatment ((A) p = 0.035; (B) p = 0.002; (C) p = 0.001).
Figure 1. Expression of immune-related genes in the head-kidney of meagre under no-stress (NS) and acute-handling-stress (AS) conditions, after four weeks of feeding with the experimental diets. (A) TNF-α, (B) IL-1β and (C) IL-10. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Different letters indicate significant differences between dietary treatments ((A) p = 0.004; (B) p = 0.001; (C) p = 0.006). * indicate differences between NS and AS fish within each dietary treatment ((A) p = 0.035; (B) p = 0.002; (C) p = 0.001).
Marinedrugs 19 00598 g001
Figure 2. Expression of HSP70 (A) and HSP90 (B) genes in the muscle of meagre under no-stress (NS) and acute-handling-stress (AS) conditions, after four weeks of feeding with the experimental diets. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). * indicate differences between NS and AS fish within the dietary treatment (p = 0.016).
Figure 2. Expression of HSP70 (A) and HSP90 (B) genes in the muscle of meagre under no-stress (NS) and acute-handling-stress (AS) conditions, after four weeks of feeding with the experimental diets. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). * indicate differences between NS and AS fish within the dietary treatment (p = 0.016).
Marinedrugs 19 00598 g002
Table 1. Growth performance, ingestion and feed efficiency of meagre (initial body weight (IBW)—28.8 g) fed the experimental diets for four weeks.
Table 1. Growth performance, ingestion and feed efficiency of meagre (initial body weight (IBW)—28.8 g) fed the experimental diets for four weeks.
DietsFinal Body Weight (g)Weight Gain (%IBW)Feed Intake
(g kg ABW—1; day—1)
Feed Efficiency
N0F042.7 ± 1.1748 ± 58.0 ± 0.70.6 ± 0.1
N0F145.9 ± 3.2259 ± 148.3 ± 1.10.7 ± 0.1
N1F041.9± 3.3940 ± 149.1 ± 1.20.5 ± 0.1
N1F140.3 ± 2.1545 ± 98.1 ± 1.00.6 ± 0.0
Two-way ANOVA Final Body WeightFeed IntakeFeed IntakeFeed Efficiency
Nnsnsns*
Fnsnsns*
N * Fnsnsnsns
ABW—Average body weight = (initial body weight + final body weight)/2. FE—Feed efficiency = weight gain/dry feed intake. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analysed by a 2-way ANOVA with Nannochloropsis (N) and Fucus (F) as factors; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05.
Table 2. Plasma biochemistry parameters for no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 2. Plasma biochemistry parameters for no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietsGlucose (mmol L−1)Lactate (mmol L−1)Cortisol (μg L−1)
No stress (NS)N0F03.7 ± 0.93.9 ± 1.21.6 ± 0.0
N0F13.3 ± 0.73.4 ± 1.31.0 ± 0.4
N1F03.0 ± 0.63.5 ± 0.80.9 ± 0.5
N1F13.0 ± 0.63.8 ± 0.91.4 ± 1.4
Acute handling stress (AS)N0F05.1 ± 0.53.5 ± 0.96.2 ± 3.5
N0F14.6 ± 0.92.7 ± 1.112.5 ± 7.2
N1F04.9 ± 0.82.6 ± 0.915.5± 21.8
N1F14.8 ± 0.72.9 ± 0.814.6 ± 4.8
Three-way ANOVA Mann–Whitney
GlucoseLactateCortisol
N*nsns
F*nsns
Stress*********
N * Fns*-
N * Stress*ns-
F * Stressnsns-
N * F * Stressnsns -
Glucose InteractionsNo stressAcute stressN0N1F0F1
N0 vs. N1**ns----
AS vs. NS--******--
Lactate Interactions
F0 vs. F1--*ns--
N0 vs. N1----*ns
Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Data were analysed by a 3-way ANOVA with N. gaditana (N), F. vesiculosus (F) and Stress as factors. When interaction between 2 factors was significant (p < 0.05), analysis of the main effects for each factor was conducted by one-way ANOVA. Cortisol was analysed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table 3. Hematological profile of no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 3. Hematological profile of no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietsRBC (106 mm−3)WBC (104 mm−3)Thrombocytes (104 mm−3)Lymphocytes (104 mm−3)Monocytes (104 mm−3)Neutrophils (104 mm−3)Hematocrit (%)MCV
No stress (NS)N0F01.5 ± 0.37.8 ± 0.9115.0 ± 7.074.8 ± 6.47.7 ± 5.02.6 ± 3.322.1 ± 2.6153.2 ± 18.2
N0F11.4 ± 0.27.8 ± 1.0118.2 ± 6.774.2 ± 6.05.9 ± 4.21.7 ± 1.921.1 ± 5.0155.4 ± 64.2
N1F01.4 ± 0.37.2 ± 1.3122.0 ± 5.173.7 ± 5.23.8 ± 2.2 0.6 ± 0.519.8 ± 2.7144.8 ± 26
N1F11.4 ± 0.28.6 ± 1.4115.1 ± 6.276.9 ± 4.85.8 ± 2.42.2 ± 2.719.9 ± 0.8142.8 ± 18.0
Acute handling stress (AS)N0F01.5 ± 0.37.0 ± 2.5121.3 ± 8.666.8 ± 7.58.6 ± 4.43.3 ± 3.423.7 ± 2.5161.2 ± 34.2
N0F11.5 ± 0.17.9 ± 1.0121.8 ± 5.067.8 ± 4.48.6 ± 4.61.9 ± 1.819.6 ± 2.4131.4 ± 18.2
N1F01.6 ± 0.27.4 ± 1.1120.8 ± 11.467.4 ± 8.19.8 ± 4.22.7 ± 1.621.2 ± 2.0135.7 ± 20.2
N1F11.6 ± 0.28.2 ± 0.9122.2 ± 8.267.4 ± 7.54.3 ± 3.06.0 ± 4.323.2 ± 2.8144.3 ± 23.1
Three-way ANOVA RBC (106 mm−3)WBC (104 mm−3)ThrombocytesLymphocytesMonocytesNeutrophilsHematocrit (%)MCV
Nnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
Fns*nsnsnsnsnsns
Stress*ns*******nsns
N * Fnsnsnsnsns**nsns
N * Stressnsnsnsnsnsns*ns
F * Stressnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
N * F * Stressnsnsnsnsnsnsnsns
Neutrophils InteractionsNo stressAcute stressN0N1F0F1
F0 vs. F1--ns*--
N0 vs. N1----ns*
Hematocrit Interactions
AS vs. NS--ns*--
N0 vs. N1*ns----
RBC—Total red blood cells; WBC—white blood cells; MCV—mean corpuscular volume. When interaction between 2 factors was significant (p < 0.05), analysis of the main effects for each factor was conducted by one-way ANOVA. Cortisol was analysed using the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table 4. Hepatic antioxidant enzymes activity in no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 4. Hepatic antioxidant enzymes activity in no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietsSODCATGPXGRG6PDH
No stress (NS)N0F0444.5 ± 52.1318.5 ± 75.8135.7 ± 24.213.3 ± 0.873.4 ± 18.8
N0F1462.3 ± 77.3358.2 ± 57.9156.1 ± 25.312.6 ± 1.387.5 ± 13.3
N1F0334.9 ± 40.0317.1 ± 54.2136.5 ± 23.812.3 ± 1.575.3 ± 19.5
N1F1395.2 ± 52.8327.7 ± 53.8138.3 ± 26.911.6 ± 1.473.1 ± 11.7
Acute handling stress (AS)N0F0622.1 ± 134.7308.1 ± 46.2626.9 ± 100.815.1 ± 0.698.3 ± 10.0
N0F1576.9 ± 149.2300.2 ± 33.7591.8 ± 89.113.6 ± 2.388.9 ± 20.7
N1F0538.4 ± 125.2287.4 ± 36.1574.7 ± 56.113.6 ± 0.878.3 ± 13.3
N1F1401.9 ± 53.0321 ± 24.7595.4 ± 56.113.6 ± 2.285.6 ± 15.6
Three-way ANOVA SODCATGPXGRG6PDH
N***nsns**
Fnsnsnsnsns
Stress***ns*******
N * Fnsnsnsnsns
N * Stressnsnsnsnsns
F * Stress*nsnsnsns
N * F * Stressnsnsnsnsns
SOD—Superoxide distumase (U mg protein−1); CAT—Catalase (U mg protein−1); GPX—Gluthatione Peroxidase; GR—Gluthatione Reductase (mU mg protein−1); G6PDH—Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (mU mg protein−1). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Data were analysed by a 3-way ANOVA with N. gaditana (N), F. vesiculosus (F) and Stress as factors. When interaction between 2 factors was p < 0.05, analysis of the main effects for each factor was conducted via a one-way ANOVA; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Table 5. Hepatic lipid peroxidation, glutathione (total, reduced and oxidised glutathione), and oxidative stress index of no-stress and acute-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 5. Hepatic lipid peroxidation, glutathione (total, reduced and oxidised glutathione), and oxidative stress index of no-stress and acute-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietstGSHGSHGSSGOSILPO
No stress (NS)N0F01924.5 ± 265.51819.7 ± 282.1104.8 ± 58.411.2 ± 6.721.8 ± 6.4
N0F12015 ± 309.51887 ± 31486.7 ± 22.98.8 ± 3.124.1 ± 12.8
N1F02030.4 ± 92.31951.9 ± 123.378.5 ± 42.27.9 ± 4.620.3 ± 4.5
N1F11896.8 ± 270.31825.6 ± 271.771.2 ± 32.67.6 ± 3.622.6 ± 9
Acute stress (AS)N0F01817.4 ± 117.31747.2 ± 123.970.2 ± 38.27.8 ± 4.125.2 ± 3.6
N0F11856.6 ± 209.41772.4 ± 240.671.8 ± 21.37.6 ± 2.629.3 ± 7.2
N1F01624.1 ± 136.41599.4 ± 29191.6 ± 46.311.1 ± 5.527.8 ± 8.9
N1F11573.7 ± 110.31531.4 ± 109.444.2 ± 215.4 ± 2.721.7 ± 5.1
Three-way ANOVA tGSHGSHGSSGOSILPO
N*nsnsnsns
Fnsnsnsnsns
Stress*****nsnsns
N * Fnsnsnsnsns
N * Stress*nsnsnsns
F * Stressnsnsnsnsns
N * F *Stressnsnsnsnsns
tGSH InteractionsNo stressAcute stressN0N1
N0 vs. N1ns**--
AS vs. NS--ns***
LPO—lipid peroxidation (nmol malondialdehyde. g tissue−1); tGSH—total glutathione; GSH—reduced glutathione (nmol/g tissue); GSSG—oxidised glutathione (nmol/ g tissue); OSI—oxidative stress index. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Data were analysed by a 3-way ANOVA with N. gaditana (N), F. vesiculosus (F) and Stress as factors. When interaction between 2 factors was p < 0.05, analysis of the main effects for each factor was conducted via a one-way ANOVA; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Table 6. Muscle antioxidant enzymes activity in no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 6. Muscle antioxidant enzymes activity in no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietsSODCATGPXGRG6PDH
No stress (NS)N0F0101.8 ± 19.70.9 ± 0.218.9 ± 1.81.4 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.1
N0F1106.8 ± 32.80.9 ± 0.223.4 ± 3.81.9 ± 0.30.6 ± 0.2
N1F0114.3 ± 13.11.0 ± 0.220.8 ± 4.41.6 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.1
N1F188.1 ± 24.81.1 ± 0.322.0 ± 3.51.9 ± 0.50.5 ± 0.2
Acute stress (S)N0F0101.8 ± 31.71.3 ± 0.418.1 ± 3.81.5 ± 0.30.5 ± 0.2
N0F1116.5 ± 40.31.3 ± 0.620.8 ± 4.71.8 ± 0.40.6 ± 0.2
N1F0107.5 ± 18.01.5 ± 0.416.0 ± 6.71.6 ± 0.40.5 ± 0.1
N1F1103.1 ± 24.41.3 ± 0.415.1 ± 3.81.3 ± 0.20.5 ± 0.1
Three-way ANOVA SODCATGPXGRG6PDH
Nns*nsns*
Fnsnsns*ns
Stressns***nsns
N * Fnsnsns*ns
N * Stressnsnsnsnsns
F * Stressnsnsns*ns
N * F * Stressnsnsnsnsns
GR InteractionsNo stressAcute stressN0N1F0F1
F0 vs. F1*ns*ns--
NS vs. AS----ns*
N0 vs. N1----ns*
SOD—Superoxide distumase (U mg protein−1); CAT—Catalase (U mg protein−1); GPX—Gluthatione Peroxidase; GR—Gluthatione Reductase (mU mg protein−1); G6PDH—Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase (mU mg protein−1). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Data were analysed by a 3-way ANOVA with N. gaditana (N), F. vesiculosus (F) and Stress as factors. When interaction between 2 factors was p < 0.05, analysis of the main effects for each factor was conducted via a one-way ANOVA; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Table 7. Muscle lipid peroxidation, glutathione (total, reduced and oxidised glutathione), and oxidative stress index of no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
Table 7. Muscle lipid peroxidation, glutathione (total, reduced and oxidised glutathione), and oxidative stress index of no-stress and acute-handling-stress meagre fed the experimental diets.
TreatmentDietstGSHGSHGSSGOSILPO
No stress (NS)N0F0179.3 ± 22.5174.9± 22.05.1 ± 0.75.6 ± 0.91.7 ± 1.1
N0F1189.4 ± 26.1184.5 ± 26.34.6 ± 1.25.2 ± 1.60.6 ± 0.4
N1F0165.1 ± 22.1160.4 ± 23.54.7 ± 1.66.1 ± 2.90.9 ± 0.6
N1F1172.0 ± 35.1164.8 ± 34.87.0 ± 5.36.3 ± 2.10.6 ± 0.4
Acute stress (S)N0F0194.9 ± 24.2186.3± 24.38.6 ± 4.88.9 ± 5.12.3 ± 1.1
N0F1188.9± 32.1179.8± 31.59.1 ± 3.99.9 ± 4.51.5 ± 0.4
N1F0200.7 ± 23.5190.3 ± 22.69.8 ± 4.510.3 ± 4.21.7 ± 0.5
N1F1184.6 ± 23.3173.1 ± 25.511.5 ± 3.513.0 ± 5.12.2 ± 1.7
Three-way ANOVA tGSHGSHGSSGOSILPO
Nnsnsnsnsns
Fnsnsnsns*
Stress*ns*********
N * Fnsnsnsnsns
N * Stressnsnsnsnsns
F * Stressnsnsnsnsns
N * F * Stressnsnsnsnsns
LPO—lipid peroxidation (nmol malondialdehyde. g tissue-1); tGSH—total glutathione; GSH—reduced glutathione (nmol/g tissue); GSSG—oxidised glutathione (nmol/g tissue); OSI—oxidative stress index. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 9). Data were analysed by a 3-way ANOVA with N. gaditana (N), F. vesiculosus (F) and Stress as factors; ns: non-significant; * p < 0.05; *** p < 0.001.
Table 8. Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets.
Table 8. Composition and proximate analysis of the experimental diets.
Diets
N0F0N1F0N0F1N1F1
Ingredients (% dry weight)
Fish meal 125.025.025.025.0
Wheat gluten 25.05.05.05.0
Corn gluten 315.015.015.015.0
Soybean meal 432.432.432.432.4
Wheat meal 50.90.90.90.9
Cellulose1.50.50.50.5
Ammonium phosphate1.31.31.31.3
Cod liver oil5.25.25.25.2
Soy bean oil5.05.05.05.0
Rapeseed oil5.05.05.05.0
Taurine 60.20.20.20.2
Vitamin mix 71.01.01.01.0
Mineral mix 81.01.01.01.0
Binder 91.01.01.01.0
Choline chloride (50%)0.50.50.50.5
N. gaditana extract 100.01.00.00.5
F. vesiculosus extract 110.00.01.00.5
Proximate analyses (% dry weight)
Dry matter (%)92.493.692.793.7
Crude protein (%)48.148.449.649.7
Crude fat (%)15.216.015.716.0
Gross Energy (kJ g−1 % DM)22.222.322.422.4
Ash (%)11.411.311.611.4
CP—Crude Protein. TL—Total lipid. 1 Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal (CP: 72.4%; TL: 17.0%). 2 Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal (CP: 84.6%; TL: 1.0%).3 Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal (CP: 69.9%; TL: 3.3%) 4 Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal (CP: 54.2%; TL: 1.8%). 5 Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal (CP: 13.8%; TL: 1.1%). 6 Feed-grade, Sorgal, S.A. Ovar, Portugal. 7 Vitamins (mg kg−1 diet): retinol, 18,000 (IU kg−1 diet); calciferol, 2000 (IU kg−1 diet); alpha tocopherol, 35; menadion sodium bis., 10; thiamin, 15; riboflavin, 25; calcium pantothenate, 50; nicotinic acid, 200; pyridoxine, 5; folic acid, 10; cyanocobalamin, 0.02; biotin, 1.5; ascorbyl monophosphate, 50; inositol, 400. 8 Minerals (mg kg−1 diet): cobalt sulphate, 1.91; copper sulphate, 19.6; iron sulphate, 200; sodium fluoride, 2.21; potassium iodide, 0.78; magnesium oxide, 830; manganese oxide, 26; sodium selenite, 0.66; zinc oxide, 37.5; dicalcium phosphate, 8.02 (g kg−1 diet); potassium chloride, 1.15 (g kg−1 diet); sodium chloride, 0.4 (g kg−1 diet). 9 Aquacube. Agil, UK. 10 Total phenolic content (TPC): 0.72 ± 0.08 mg galic acid (GA) g−1 dry weight; 2,2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS) radical scavenging activity: 24.97 ± 2.01 μmol 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) g−1 dry weight; 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical scavenging activity: 5.78 ± 0.48 μmol Trolox g−1 dry weight. (Determined in [26].). 11 Total phenolic content (TPC): 7.93 ± 0.34 mg GA g−1 dry weight; ABTS radical scavenging activity: 99.37 ± 11.27 μmol Trolox g−1 dry weight; DPPH radical scavenging activity: 81.54 ± 6.71 μmol Trolox g−1 dry weight. (Determined in [26].).
Table 9. Primer sequences used for transcript amplification by RT-PCR.
Table 9. Primer sequences used for transcript amplification by RT-PCR.
GeneSequenceEfficiencyAmplicon (bp)Reference
EF-1αF: TACGGTTCCGATACCGCCG2.0189[77]
R: AACATGCTTGAGGGCAGTGACAA
IL-1βF: GATTGCCTGGATTTTCCACTGTCTCCA2.3103[77]
R: GTGGCTCTGGGCATCAAGGG
IL-10F: ACTCCTCGGTCTCTCCTCGTATCCGC2.1187[77]
R: CTGTGTCGAGATCATCGTTGGCTTCATAAAAGTC
TNF-αF: CACAAGAGCGGCCATTCATTTACAAGGAG1.8173[77]
R: GGAAAGACGCTTGGCTGTAGATGG
HSP70F: ATCACAGTTCCGGCGTATTT1.9197Present study
R: ATGGACACGTCAAAGGTGCC
HSP90F: ATCGTGGAGACTCTCAGGCA1.9146Present study
R: CTGTAGATGCGGTTGGAGTG
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Monteiro, M.; Sousa, C.; Coutinho, F.; Castro, C.; Fontinha, F.; Guerreiro, I.; Pousão, P.; Matos, E.; Díaz-Rosales, P.; Oliva-Teles, A.; et al. Functional Feeds to Tackle Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Stress: Physiological Responses under Acute Stressful Handling Conditions. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110598

AMA Style

Monteiro M, Sousa C, Coutinho F, Castro C, Fontinha F, Guerreiro I, Pousão P, Matos E, Díaz-Rosales P, Oliva-Teles A, et al. Functional Feeds to Tackle Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Stress: Physiological Responses under Acute Stressful Handling Conditions. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(11):598. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110598

Chicago/Turabian Style

Monteiro, Marta, Carla Sousa, Filipe Coutinho, Carolina Castro, Filipa Fontinha, Inês Guerreiro, Pedro Pousão, Elisabete Matos, Patrícia Díaz-Rosales, Aires Oliva-Teles, and et al. 2021. "Functional Feeds to Tackle Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Stress: Physiological Responses under Acute Stressful Handling Conditions" Marine Drugs 19, no. 11: 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110598

APA Style

Monteiro, M., Sousa, C., Coutinho, F., Castro, C., Fontinha, F., Guerreiro, I., Pousão, P., Matos, E., Díaz-Rosales, P., Oliva-Teles, A., Enes, P., & Couto, A. (2021). Functional Feeds to Tackle Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) Stress: Physiological Responses under Acute Stressful Handling Conditions. Marine Drugs, 19(11), 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19110598

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop