Next Article in Journal
The Genetic and Phenotypic Diversity of Bacillus spp. from the Mariculture System in China and Their Potential Function against Pathogenic Vibrio
Next Article in Special Issue
Coral Lipids
Previous Article in Journal
Marine-Derived Lead Fascaplysin: Pharmacological Activity, Total Synthesis, and Structural Modification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protist–Lactic Acid Bacteria Co-Culture as a Strategy to Bioaccumulate Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in the Protist Aurantiochytrium sp. T66
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 21
Issue 4
10.3390/md21040227
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Unravelling the Lipids Content and the Fatty Acid Profiles of Eight Recently Described Halophytophthora Species and H. avicennae from the South Coast of Portugal

by
Cristiana Maia
1,
Thomas Jung
2,3,
Aschwin Engelen
1,
Marília Horta Jung
2,3 and
Luísa Custódio
1,*
1
Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), University of Algarve, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal
2
Phytophthora Research Centre, Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
3
Phytophthora Research and Consultancy, 83131 Nußdorf, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(4), 227; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040227
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 29 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Lipids 2023)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this study, mycelia of eight recently described species of Halophytophthora and H. avicennae collected in Southern Portugal were analysed for lipids and fatty acids (FA) content to evaluate their possible use as alternative sources of FAs and understand how each species FAs profile relates to their phylogenetic position. All species had a low lipid percentage (0.06% in H. avicennae to 0.28% in H. frigida). Subclade 6b species contained more lipids. All species produced monounsaturated (MUFA), polyunsaturated (PUFA) and saturated (SFA) FAs, the latter being most abundant in all species. H. avicennae had the highest FA variety and was the only producer of γ-linolenic acid, while H. brevisporangia produced the lowest number of FAs. The best producer of arachidonic acid (ARA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was H. thermoambigua with 3.89% and 9.09% of total FAs, respectively. In all species, palmitic acid (SFA) was most abundant and among the MUFAs produced oleic acid had the highest relative percentage. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed partial segregation of species by phylogenetic clade and subclade based on their FA profile. H. avicennae (Clade 4) differed from all other Clade 6 species due to the production of γ-linolenic and lauric acids. Our results disclosed interesting FA profiles in the tested species, adequate for energy (biodiesel), pharmaceutical and food industries (bioactive FAs). Despite the low amounts of lipids produced, this can be boosted by manipulating culture growth conditions. The observed interspecific variations in FA production provide preliminary insights into an evolutionary background of its production.

1. Introduction

Halophytophthora species are oomycetes (kingdom Straminipila, family Peronosporaceae) commonly known to inhabit marine and estuarine ecosystems especially in tropical and subtropical areas [1,2,3]. However, H. vesicula (under its previous designation as Phytophthora vesicula) was first described from a marine habitat near Vancouver [4], and more recent surveys demonstrated the presence of Halophytophthora species in the North Sea [5,6]. Furthermore, Yang and Hong [7] reported a new species, H. fluviatilis, from a freshwater location in Virginia, USA, which was also found widespread in rivers and streams of Eastern Spain [8]. These findings indicate that this genus is well adapted to a wide range of temperature and salinity conditions. Halophytophthoras are mostly known as saprophytes, playing an important role in decomposition and secondary production [9]. However, some species have been isolated from seeds of the seagrass Zostera marina and are associated with reduced germination rates [6,10], suggesting they might also act as pathogens.
The genus Halophytophthora was first created to accommodate nine marine Phytophthora species that differed from those of freshwater and terrestrial origin in terms of morphological and cultivation characteristics, such as differences in the apical structure of the sporangium and the mode of zoospore release [11]. Since phylogenetic studies demonstrated that the genus was polyphyletic, numerous species were transferred to other genera, i.e., Calycofera, Phytopythium, Salisapilia, Salispina, leaving H. vesicula (the type species), H. avicennae, H. batemanensis, H. fluviatilis, H. insularis, H. polymorphica, H. souzae and eight newly described species from Portugal (H. brevisporangia, H. celeris, H. frigida, H. lateralis, H. lusitanica, H. macrosporangia, H. sinuata, H. thermoambigua) in the genus Halophytophthora sensu stricto [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
Fatty acids (FAs) can be divided into saturated (SFAs), monounsaturated (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated (PUFAs) based on the absence or presence of one or more double bonds. FAs have, in general, multiple applications, ranging from human health improvement, and aquaculture, to biotechnological applications. For example, microorganisms capable of producing relevant amounts of SFAs are attractive for the biodiesel production industry and could be used to mitigate sustainability issues related to first- and second-generation biofuels [19,20]. PUFAs are divided into two major families, omega 3 (ω-3) and omega 6 (ω-6) [21,22] and have beneficial health effects in humans. For instance, arachidonic acid (ARA), an ω-6 FA, as well as docosahexaenoic acid (ω-3, DHA) are essential in the development of the central nervous system and the retina in infants, and ω-3 FA, in general, have anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic properties that can be used in anticancer therapies [23,24,25]. Traditionally, the main source of PUFAs is wild fish, but with the decrease in fish stocks due to overfishing, alternative sources are needed [21]. Among the sustainable alternatives are aquaculture fish, bioengineered plants, microalgae and krill [22]. Several aquatic microorganisms have also been explored, with microalgae and thraustochytrids giving promising results in terms of the production of PUFAs, in particular omega-3 FAs [26,27,28]. Oomycetes have mostly been overlooked, although several studies showed that members from several genera, including Halophytophthora, Phytophthora, Pythium and Salispina, can produce a wide variety of FAs [29,30,31,32,33]. Pang et al. [31] reported, for the first time, the production of arachidonic acid (ω-6, ARA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (ω-3, EPA) by different Halophytophthora species isolated from fallen mangrove leaves in Taiwan, suggesting these oomycetes as a potential alternative source of such compounds.
A survey conducted by our research group in 2015 along the Algarve coast resulted in the isolation of H. avicennae and eight previously unknown Halophytophthora taxa, which were recently described as new species [18]. As a result, the opportunity to expand the limited knowledge regarding FA production by Halophytophthoras emerged. All studies previously published on Halophytophthora FAs were conducted on isolates from mangroves in Taiwan or the Philippines [31,32,33,34,35], while this study aimed to bring new insights on FAs produced by all nine Halophytopthora species isolated along the Algarve coast from different ecosystems (salt marshes and estuaries), and to unravel interspecific differences in FA profiles and analyse how these relate to their phylogenetic position. Since there is variability in the production of FAs among different species and even isolates from the same species, it is of value to investigate the FA profiles of newly described species to screen for species that produce more interesting profiles. Furthermore, to evaluate the potential of Halophytophthoras to be used as an alternative source of interesting FAs, lipid production was analysed. To achieve this goal, we screened the nine Halophytophthora species for the production of SFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs, using a direct transesterification method for extraction and derivatisation, followed by gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC/MS) for detection, and lipid accumulation using a modified gravimetric method. To analyse variations in FA profiles among the tested species, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Total Lipids

All Halophytophthora species had low amounts of lipids with some visible interspecific variation. The percentage of total lipids ranged from 0.06% in H. avicenniae to 0.28% in H. frigida, both differing significantly from the other species (except for H. avicennae and H. thermoambigua) and from each other (Figure 1).
A recent phylogenetic analysis of all Halophytophthora species resulted in an updated phylogeny of the genus organized in 10 clades. All eight new Halophytophthora species from the Algarve coast reside in Clade 6 and are divided into Subclade 6a and Subclade 6b. Halophytophthora avicennae resides in Clade 4 [18]. There seems to be a tendency for Halophytophthoras from Subclade 6b, which includes all three homothallic species (H. frigida, H. sinuata and H. macrosporangia) and the two fastest growing species (H. brevisporangia and H. celeris), to have higher amounts of lipids, since four of the five species with the highest percentages of lipids are from this subclade (Figure 1). Halophytophthora macrosporangia is more similar to the species from Subclade 6a, but there was substantial variation in the lipid percentage among the three replicates of this species, ranging from 0.08% to 0.18% (av. 0.14 ± 0.05%). The lowest value, although not a significant outlier, differs considerably from the other two values and is closer to H. avicennae.
Homothallic species produce reproductive sexual structures (oogonia and antheridia) in single culture, i.e., without the need of a mating partner. Some studies suggest that the sexual structures have higher amounts of lipids than the vegetative ones. To our knowledge, there are no reports on total lipids in Halophytophthora spp., and only a few studies from more than 45 years ago were performed on Phytophthora species. Specifically, Bartnicki-Garcia [36] conducted a study on the chemistry of the hyphal walls of P. cinnamomi and P. parasitica revealing that both species had small amounts of lipids, mostly of the bound type (2.1% and 0.9%, respectively), while free lipids accounted only for 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively, of the wall dry weight. In 1973, Lippman et al. [37] studied the composition of the oospore and oogonium walls of P. megasperma. Lipids were extracted from the oospore–oogonium walls (OOW) and from the oospore–oogonium–antheridium (OOA) apparatus. The OOA presented the higher percentage of lipids (19.2%), mostly of the bound type. In both studies, lipids were extracted using a direct extraction method that was followed by acidic digestion for the extraction of the bound lipids. The mycelia of the three homothallic species used in this study, H. frigida, H. macrosporangia and H. sinuata, harvested after 10 days of growth in liquid broth, were not checked for the presence of oogonia and antheridia and, hence, it is not known whether or not these structures were produced. Furthermore, different species have different timings to produce sexual structures. In the case of Phytophthora species, which are closely related to Halophytophthora, the oospore, containing inside a large lipid-like body (the ooplast), is usually formed after 5 to 10 days of incubation. However, some species require longer periods of incubation [38]. It is possible that H. frigida produced the reproductive structures faster or more abundantly than the other two homothallic species, which could explain the higher level of lipids detected. Halophytophthora sinuata, the species with the second highest percentage of lipids, produces the largest oogonia of all known homothallic Halophytophthora species [18], which might explain the high lipid content. However, the lipid content of the sterile species H. brevisporangia, H. lateralis and H. celeris did not differ significantly from H. sinuata and were even higher than in the homothallic H. macrosporangia (Figure 1). Future studies are required to assess the production of oogonia and antheridia by homothallic Halophytophthora in liquid broth and the possible association between their abundance and the lipid contents of mycelia.
Apart from the presence of reproductive structures that might influence the concentration of lipids in Halophytophthora, there was no indication of any morphological and physiological characteristic explaining the higher percentage of lipids in isolates from Subclade 6b. For instance, H. frigida from Subclade 6b and H. lateralis and H. lusitanica from Subclade 6a have similar growth rates at 20 °C [18] but show significant differences in their lipid contents (Figure 1). Furthermore, even within Subclade 6b the lipid contents of H. frigida isolate BD675 and H. macrosporangia isolate BD656 differ significantly despite sharing a low optimum temperature for growth at 15 °C and generally slow growth (Figure 1) [18].
Our study shows that Halophytophthoras have low amounts of lipids. However, the lipid content can be increased through manipulation of the culture growing conditions, for example, by growing homothallic species for a longer period, allowing them to produce more sexual structures or by using alkaline or acid hydrolysis to extract the bound lipids that might not have been extracted. There are no studies conducted in Halophytophthora spp. for lipid accumulation improvement through culture conditions manipulation; however, it is known that in microalgae cultivation, inducing stress is a traditional way of increasing lipids via nutrient deficiency, salinity stress and temperature [39,40]. Assays are now being conducted in this regard.

2.2. FA Profile

All the Halophytophthora species produced SFAs, MUFAs and PUFAs (both ω-3 and ω-6) with, on average, ten FAs per species, but interspecific variation was observed in the number and amount of FAs detected (Table 1). SFAs were the most abundant group of FAs produced by all species, ranging between 43.68% in H. sinuata and 61.76% in H. brevisporangia, followed by PUFAs and, finally, MUFAs (Table 1).
Halophytophthora avicennae produced a wider variety of FAs (12), being the only species producing γ-linoleic acid (2.12% of total FAs), while H. brevisporangia produced the lowest number of FAs (7). The four most abundant FAs in all species were C16:0 (palmitic acid), C18:1n9c (oleic acid), C18:2n6 (9,12-octadecadienoic acid) and C14:0 (myristic acid) (Figure 2). Among the five PUFAs detected, 9,12-octadecadienoic acid was the most abundant, ranging between 11.11% in H. avicennae and 25.8% in H. macrosporangia (Figure 2). Interestingly, both eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and arachidonic acid (ARA) were produced by all species. EPA was produced in higher amounts than ARA, with H. thermoambigua being the most prolific producer with a percentage of 9.09%. The latter species also had the highest percentage of ARA (3.89%) which was statistically different from all other species, except for H. lusitanica (3.48%) (Figure 2). In the study of Pang et al. [31], the best ARA producer was Salispina spinosa (previously H. spinosa var. spinosa; isolate IBM 162) with 25.02%, while EPA was prevalent in H. avicenniae (isolate IBM 144) with 18.42%, approximately the double of our best producer, H. thermoambigua, and almost three times higher than the percentage observed for H. avicennae isolate BD697. Both PUFAs have high importance for human health. ARA is essential in the development of the central nervous system and the retina in infants [23], whereas EPA plays a major role in preventing cardiovascular diseases [41].
Besides PUFAs, SFAs and MUFAs were also produced. Although being generally less interesting in terms of human health improvement than PUFAs, with some of them even being associated with cardiovascular diseases, SFAs and MUFAs can have interesting biotechnological uses, for instance, in the production of biodiesel. The level of unsaturation correlates with the suitability of the FAs to be used as biodiesel. High levels of SFAs and MUFAs are desirable due to their oxidative and thermal stability [42]. As previously stated, SFAs were the most abundant group of FAs produced by all Halophytophthora species. Former studies with other marine oomycetes showed promising results regarding the potential use of these microorganisms as alternative sources of lipids for biodiesel production. For example, Patel et al. [43] studied the production of microbial oils in the aquatic oomycete Achlya diffusa. Cultivated in sugarcane bagasse, this water mold showed a total lipid content of 50.26% (w/w) and a FA profile with high levels of SFAs and MUFAs comparable to those of vegetable oils. Furthermore, some of the biodiesel properties of the lipids obtained from A. diffusa, such as density and kinematic viscosity, satisfied the limits as determined by international standards ASTM-D6751 and EN-14214, demonstrating its suitability as a fuel for diesel engines. Regarding SFAs, palmitic acid was most abundant, with relative percentages ranging between 26.56% (H. macrosporangia) and 38.63% (H. brevisporangia) (Figure 2). These results are in accordance with other studies on Halophytophthora species, where palmitic acid was the most abundant SFA and sometimes even being the most abundant of all FAs [31,34]. As with MUFAs, oleic acid had the highest relative percentage with H. frigida and H. sinuata being the best producers and differing significantly from the other species (Figure 2).
Our isolates did not produce docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), an important ω-3 FA which is essential for the development of brain function in infants and the maintenance of brain function in adults [25]. In contrast to all Halophytophthora isolates tested in the present study, isolate H. sp. S13005YL-3.1, belonging to an unknown Halophytophthora species, produced DHA when grown in PYG media but failed to produce EPA in any of the conditions tested in the study of Say et al. [32]. Culture conditions greatly affect mycelial growth and the production of FAs, and can be manipulated to optimize the production of these compounds. Duan et al. [30] studied the effect of different parameters, including growth medium, incubation temperature and time, on the production of FAs by Phytophthora and observed that these parameters have a significant impact on the production of those compounds. Caguimbal et al. [33] studied the FA profile of Halophytophthora vesicula (isolates AK1YB2 and PQ1YB3) and Salispina spinosa (isolate ST1YB3) using both V8S and PYGS media and their results showed significant differences in the production of individual FAs. PYGS proved to be a better medium to produce ARA in all three isolates tested. Say et al. [32] tested the production of FAs in media with different pH and salinity and concluded that isolate H. sp. S13005YL-3.1 produced a higher percentage of ARA when grown in V8 (pH 6; 10 ppt), compared to V8 (pH 8; 30 ppt). V8 media, like the one used in this study, PYG media and even a mix of both are the most widely used culture media in studies on the production of FAs by oomycetes and Thraustochytrids [31,32,33,34,35,44]. Owing to their production from commercially available vegetable juice, V8 media cannot as easily be manipulated as PYG, in which the concentrations of each component can be optimised to enhance FA production. Therefore, it seems likely that the FA production of the Halophytophthora species tested in our study could be increased by using different culture media and optimising important parameters such as salinity and pH.
Another potential use of FA produced by Halophytophthora species could be in cancer research. As mentioned before, the most abundant FAs in all Halophytophthora species tested in this study were palmitic, oleic, myristic and 9,12-octadecadienoic acids. These FA profiles resemble those from the species used in the study by Devanadera et al. [34], which explored the cytotoxic potential against breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF7) of crude FAs produced by Halophytophthora and Salispina isolates. The crude FAs displayed significant toxicity towards MCF7 cells while being nontoxic to HDFn cells (normal dermal fibroblasts) as determined by the MTT assay, indicating that FAs, and particularly those produced by Halophytophthora, may potentially be used as adjuvants in cancer treatments.
PCA was used to identify variations in the FA profiles of all nine Halophytophthora species tested as well as potential relationships to their phylogenetic positions. Overall, PCA shows that Halophytophthora species can be separated, to some extent, based on their FA profiles. Three significant PCs were generated (eigenvalues higher than 1): PC1, PC2 and PC3 accounted for 40.11%, 27.11% and 19.29% of the total variance, respectively. According to the loading plots (Figure 3A,C), PC1 has strong positive contributions from primarily C:20 FA (arachidonic, eicosapentaenoic and eicosatrienoic acids) and negative contributions from 9,12-octadecadienoic acid (C18:2n6) and myristic acid (C14:0). PC2 is mostly negatively correlated with C18 FA (stearic, oleic and γ-linolenic acids) and lauric acid and positively correlated with myristic acid, while PC3 is positively correlated with oleic and 9,12-octadecadienoic acids and negatively correlated with myristic, palmitic and γ-linolenic acids. The score plots (Figure 3B,D) show H. avicennae from Clade 4 and the three Halophytophthora species from Subclade 6a on the positive PC1 axis, while species from Subclade 6b are mostly scattered on the negative PC1 axis, except for H. macrosporangia, where two of the replicates have positive values on the PC1 axis and the other replicate resides on the negative side.
The species H. sinuata and H. frigida are separated mainly because of the influence of oleic acid, of which they have the highest percentages compared to the other species. Halophytophthora avicennae from Clade 4 is clearly separated from the other species, mainly due to the production of γ-linolenic acid and lauric acid. Halophytophthora brevisporangia clusters separately from the other species mainly influenced by the production of myristic acid. In the PC1–PC2 loading plot (Figure 3C), which explains most of the variability, H. thermoambigua is differentiated from the other two Subclade 6a species mostly because of the low amounts of oleic acid it produces compared with the other two species.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Halophytophthora Isolates

Using an in situ baiting technique, the nine Halophytophthora species and isolates used in this study were obtained in December 2015 from various marine and brackish-water ecosystems at six sites along the Algarve coast of Portugal [18]: H. avicennae isolate BD697 from the estuary of Rio Guadiana; H. brevisporangia isolate BD658 from a tidal pond in a salt marsh of the Ria Formosa at Quelfes; H. celeris isolate BD646 and H. macrosporangia isolate BD645 from a tidal channel in a salt marsh of the Ria Formosa at Santa Luzia; H. frigida isolate BD675 from a coastal lagoon of the Ria de Alvor; H. lateralis isolate BD680 from a coastal lagoon of the Ria Formosa at Almancil; H. lusitanica isolate BD632 and H. thermoambigua isolate BD631 from the estuary of Rio Séqua at Tavira; and H. sinuata isolate BD656 (=CBS 147237) from a tidal pond in a salt marsh of the Ria Formosa at Santa Luzia. Stock cultures were maintained on carrot juice agar (CA) at 10 °C in the dark [45].

3.2. Biomass Production

All Halophytophthora isolates were grown in 90 mm Petri dishes containing V8 juice agar (V8A) [46] for a week at 20 °C in the dark. V8A discs cut from the edge of the growing colonies were transferred to 90 mm Petri dishes with V8 juice broth (V8B; 3 g CaCO3, 100 mL V8 juice, 900 mL distilled water) for 10 days at 20 °C in the dark. Mycelia were harvested, washed thoroughly with sterilized distilled water, blotted dry with filter paper, and stored at −80 °C prior to lyophilisation. After lyophilisation, mycelia were ground to a powder using a mortar and pestle and stored in sealed tubes in the dark at 20 °C until total lipids and fatty acid analysis.

3.3. Total Lipids Quantification

Total lipids quantification was accomplished by using the modified gravimetric method of Bligh and Dyer [47]. Eight milligrams lyophilized Halophytophthora biomass was suspended in 0.8 mL distilled water and left to rest for 30 min. Then, 2 mL methanol and 1 mL chloroform were added, and the mixture homogenized in the Ultra-Turrax® for 1 min, followed by adding 1 mL chloroform and homogenising for 30 s and finally by adding 1 mL distilled water and homogenising for 30 s. The tubes containing this mixture were centrifuged for 10 min at room temperature at. The bottom layer was collected, and a known amount (between 0.8 and 1.2 mL) was pipetted to previously weighed tubes that were then placed in a dry bath inside the fume hood overnight. The tubes were weighed after evaporation of the chloroform. Total lipids were quantified as a percentage of dry weight.

3.4. Fatty Acid (FA) Recovery and Analysis

FA recovery was achieved using the modified direct transesterification method of Lepage and Roy [48]. One hundred milligrams Halophytophthora biomass was suspended in the solvent solution (methanol/acetyl chloride, 20:1, v/v), and cell disruption was achieved using an ultrasonic bath for 15 min followed by the addition of 1 mL hexane and 1 h heating at 100 °C. Afterward, the mixture was chilled in an ice bath and 1 mL distilled water was added to stop the reaction. Finally, 3 mL hexane was added, vortexed and the organic top layer, containing the fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs), was removed. After repeating the last steps twice, the fractions were merged and then evaporated overnight on a hot plate at 60 °C. After evaporation, FAMEs were reconstituted in hexane at a concentration of 2 mg mL−1. FAMEs were analysed in a Bruker Scion 456/GC, Scion TQ MS, coupled with a 30 mm ZB-5MS capillary column (0.25 mm internal diameter and 0.25 µm film thickness, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) using helium as carrier gas (1 mL min−1). Samples (1 µL) were injected at 300 °C in splitless mode and the following temperature profile of the GC oven: 60 °C (1 min), 30 °C min−1 to 120 °C, 4 °C min−1 to 250 °C, and 20 °C min−1 to 300 °C (4 min). The identification of the FAMEs was performed by using a Supelco® 37 Component FAME Mix (Sigma-Aldrich, Sintra, Portugal). Results are expressed as percentages of total FA.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Results were expressed as means ± standard deviation (SD) and the experiments were performed in triplicate. One-way ANOVA was used to analyse total lipids and fatty acids data, followed by Tukey’s test for assessing significance of differences. Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were tested using the Shapiro–Wilk and the Brown–Forsythe tests, respectively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to assess FA contribution to interspecies variation. The statistical software used to perform the analysis was GraphPad Prism version 9 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA).

4. Conclusions

This is the first study unravelling the FA production by eight recently described Halophytophthora species and H. avicennae from marine and brackish-water ecosystems in Southern Portugal. It was shown that all isolates accumulate lipids and produce a wide range of interesting FAs, similar to those produced by other oomycetes previously examined for their potential use as alternative FA sources. All the Halophytophthora species produced SFAs (the most abundant), followed by PUFAs and, finally, MUFAs, with on average ten FAs per species. To improve the process and yield, further research is needed. For example, cultivation of the isolates in different media at different pH and salinity conditions, and a different extraction technique should be tested to increase the amount of lipids produced and accumulated by Halophytophthora spp. Multivariate analysis revealed variations in FA production among Halophytophthora species, providing preliminary insights into an evolutionary background of FA production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, C.M., A.E. and L.C.; formal analysis, C.M., T.J. and L.C.; funding acquisition, L.C.; investigation, C.M.; methodology, C.M., A.E. and L.C.; resources, T.J., and M.H.J.; supervision, T.J., A.E. and L.C.; validation, T.J., A.E. and M.H.J.; writing—original draft, C.M.; writing—review and editing, T.J., A.E., M.H.J. and L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received Portuguese national funds from FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology through projects UIDB/04326/2020, UIDP/04326/2020 and LA/P/0101/2020. Cristiana Maia acknowledges FCT and the European Social Fund (FSE) for her Ph.D. grant (SFRH/BD/136277/2018) and Luísa Custódio acknowledges the FCT Scientific Employment Stimulus (CEECIND/00425/2017). Thomas Jung and Marilia Horta Jung acknowledge the Project Phytophthora Research Centre Reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/15_003/0000453 cofinanced by the Czech Ministry for Education, Youth and Sports and the European Regional Development Fund.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fell, J.W.; Master, I.M. Phycomycetes (Phytophthora spp. nov. and Pythium sp. nov.) associated with degrading mangrove (Rhizophora mangle) leaves. Canad. J. Bot. 1975, 53, 2908–2922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gerrettson-Cornell, L.; Simpson, J. Three new marine Phytophthora species from New South Wales. Mycotaxon 1984, 19, 453–470. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nakagiri, A.; Ito, T.; Manoch, L.; Tanticharoen, M. A new Halophytophthora species, H. porrigovesica, from subtropical and tropical mangroves. Mycoscience 2001, 42, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anastasiou, C.J.; Churchland, L.M. Churchland LM Fungi on decaying leaves in marine habitats. Canad. J. Bot. 1969, 47, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Nigrelli, L.; Thines, M. Tropical oomycetes in the German Bight—Climate warming or overlooked diversity? Fungal Ecol. 2013, 6, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Man in’t Veld, W.A.; Rosendahl, K.C.H.M.; van Rijswick, P.C.J.; Meffert, J.P.; Boer, E.; Westenberg, M.; van der Heide, T.; Govers, L.L. Multiple Halophytophthora spp. and Phytophthora spp. including P. gemini, P. inundata and P. chesapeakensis sp. nov. isolated from the seagrass Zostera marina in the Northern hemisphere. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2018, 153, 341–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, X.; Hong, C. Halophytophthora fluviatilis sp. nov. from freshwater in Virginia. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 352, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Caballol, M.; Štraus, D.; Macia, H.; Ramis, X.; Redondo, M.Á.; Oliva, J. Halophytophthora fluviatilis Pathogenicity and Distribution along a Mediterranean-Subalpine Gradient. J. Fungi 2021, 7, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nakagiri, A. Ecology and biodiversity of Halophytophthora species. Fungal Divers 2000, 5, 153–164. [Google Scholar]
  10. Govers, L.L.; van der Zee, E.M.; Meffert, J.P.; van Rijswick, P.C.J.; Man in’t Veld, W.A.; Heusinkveld, J.H.T.; van der Heide, T. Copper treatment during storage reduces Phytophthora and Halophytophthora infection of Zostera marina seeds used for restoration. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Ho, H.H.; Jong, S.C. Halophytophthora, gen. nov., a new member of the family Pythiaceae. Mycotaxon 1990, 36, 377–382. [Google Scholar]
  12. Thines, M. Phylogeny and evolution of plant pathogenic oomycetes—A global overview. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2014, 38, 431–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, G.J.; Hyde, K.D.; Zhao, R.L.; Hongsanan, S.; Abdel-Aziz, F.A.; Abdel-Wahab, M.A.; Alvarado, P.; Alves-Silva, G.; Ammirati, J.F.; Ariyawansa, H.A.; et al. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Divers. 2016, 78, 1–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bennett, R.M.; Cock, A.W.A.M.; Lévesque, A.; Thines, M. Calycofera gen. nov., an estuarine sister taxon to Phytopythium, Peronosporaceae. Mycol. Prog. 2017, 16, 947–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bennet, R.M.; Thines, M. Revisiting Salisapiliaceae. Fungal Syst. Evol. 2019, 3, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jesus, A.L.; Marano, A.V.; Gonçalves, D.R.; Jerônimo, G.H.; Pires-Zotarelli, C.L.A. Two new species of Halophytophthora from Brazil. Mycol. Prog. 2019, 18, 1411–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Su, C.J.; Hsieh, S.Y.; Chiang, M.W.L.; Pang, K.L. Salinity, pH and temperature growth ranges of Halophytophthora isolates suggest their physiological adaptations to mangrove environments. Mycology 2020, 11, 256–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Maia, C.; Horta Jung, M.; Carella, G.; Milenković, I.; Janoušek, J.; Tomšovský, M.; Mosca, S.; Schena, L.; Cravador, A.; Moricca, S.; et al. Eight new Halophytophthora species from marine and brackish-water ecosystems in Portugal and an updated phylogeny for the genus. Persoonia 2022, 48, 54–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, Q.; Sen, B.; Liu, X.; He, Y.; Xie, Y.; Wang, G. Enhanced saturated fatty acids accumulation in cultures of newly-isolated strains of Schizochytrium sp. and Thraustochytriidae sp. for large-scale biodiesel production. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 631–632, 994–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Acheampong, M.; Ertemb, F.C.; Kappler, B.; Neubauer, P. In pursuit of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) number 7: Will biofuels be reliable? Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2017, 75, 927–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abedi, E.; Sahari, M.A. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid sources and evaluation of their nutritional and functional properties. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adarme-Vega, T.C.; Thomas-Hall, S.R.; Schenk, P.M. Towards sustainable sources for omega-3 fattu acids production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 26, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tallima, H.; Ridi, R.E. Arachidonic acid: Physiological roles and potential health benefits—A review. J. Adv. Res. 2018, 11, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Spencer, L.; Mann, C.; Metcalfe, M.; Webb, M.; Pollard, C.; Spencer, D.; Berry, D.; Steward, W.; Dennison, A. The effect of omega-3 FAs on tumour angiogenesis and their therapeutic potential. Eur. J. Cancer 2009, 45, 2077–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Horrocks, L.A.; Yeo, Y.K. Health benefits of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). Pharmacol. Res. 1999, 40, 211–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Adarme-Vega, T.C.; Lim, K.Y.D.; Timmins, M.; Vernen, F.; Li, Y.; Schenk, P.M. Microalgal biofactories: A promising approach towards sustainable omega-3 fatty acid production. Microb. Cell Factories 2012, 11, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kobayashi, T.; Sakaguchi, K.; Matsuda, T.; Abe, E.; Hama, Y.; Hayashi, M.; Honda, D.; Okita, Y.; Sugimoto, S.; Okino, N.; et al. Increase of eicosapentaenoic acid in thraustochytrids through thraustochytrid ubiquitin promoter-driven expression of a fatty acid Δ5 desaturase gene. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3870–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Marchan, L.F.; Chang, K.J.L.; Nichols, P.D.; Mitchell, W.J.; Polglase, J.L.; Gutierrez, T. Taxonomy, ecology and biotechnological applications of thraustochytrids: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2018, 36, 26–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stredansky, M.; Conti, E.; Salaris, A. Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids by Pythium ultimum in solid-state cultivation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 26, 304–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Duan, C.H.; Riley, M.B.; Jeffers, S.N. Effects of growth medium, incubation temperature, and mycelium age on production of five major fatty acids by six species of Phytophthora. Arch. Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2011, 44, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pang, K.L.; Lin, H.J.; Lin, H.Y.; Huang, Y.F.; Chen, Y.M. Production of arachidonic and eicosapentaenoic acids by the marine oomycete Halophytophthora. Mar. Biotechnol. 2015, 17, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Say, E.K.P.; Yabut, A.T.V.; Cinco, N.E.T.; Caguimbal, N.A.L.E.; Devadanera, M.K.P.; Bennett, R.M.; Arafiles, K.H.V.; Aki, T.; Dedeles, G.R. Growth and fatty acid production of Halophytophthora S13005YL1-1.3 under different salinity and pH levels. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 2017, 100, 6–11. [Google Scholar]
  33. Caguimbal, N.A.L.E.; Devadanera, M.K.P.; Bennett, R.M.; Arafiles, K.H.V.; Watanabe, K.; Aki, T.; Dedeles, G.R. Growth and fatty acid profiles of Halophytophthora vesicula and Salispina spinosa from Philippine mangrove leaves. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 69, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Devanadera, M.K.P.; Bennett, R.M.; Watanabe, K.; Santiago, M.R.; Ramos, M.C.; Aki, T.; Dedeles, G.R. Marine Oomycetes (Halophytophthora and Salispina): A potential source of fatty acids with cytotoxic activity against breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF7). J. Oleo Sci. 2019, 68, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Su, C.J.; Ju, W.T.; Chen, Y.M.; Chiang, M.W.L.; Hsieh, S.Y.; Lin, H.J.; Gareth Jones, E.; Pang, K.L. Palmitic acid and long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids dominate in mycelia of mangrove Halophytophthora and Salispina species in Taiwan. Botanica Marina 2021, 64, 503–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bartnicki-Garcia, S. Chemistry of hyphal walls of Phytophthora. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1966, 42, 57–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Lippman, E.; Erwin, D.C.; Bartnicki-Garcia, S. Isolation and chemical composition of oospore-oogonium walls of Phytophthora megasperma var. sojae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1974, 80, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Erwin, D.C.; Ribeiro, O.K. Phytophthora Diseases Worldwide; APS Press: St. Paul, MN, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  39. Mulgund, A. Increasing lipid accumulation in microalgae through environmental manipulation, metabolic and genetic engineering: A review in the energy NEXUS framework. Energy Nexus 2022, 5, 100054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Piligaev, A.V.; Sorokina, K.N.; Samoylova, Y.V.; Parmon, V.N. Production of Microalgal Biomass with High Lipid Content and Their Catalytic Processing Into Biodiesel: A Review. Catal. Ind. 2019, 11, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Narayan, B.; Miyashita, K.; Hosakawa, M. Physiological effects of Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) and Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA)—A review. Food Rev. Int. 2006, 22, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lee Chang, K.J.; Rye, L.; Dunstan, G.A.; Grant, T.; Koutoulis, A.; Nichols, P.D.; Blackburn, S.I. Life cycle assessment: Heterotrophic cultivation of thraustochytrids for biodiesel production. J. Appl. Phycol. 2015, 27, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patel, A.; Matsakas, L.; Pruthi, P.A.; Pruthi, V. Potential of aquatic oomycete as a novel feedstock for microbial oil grown on waste sugarcane bagasse. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 33443–33454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Leaño, E.M.; Gapasin, R.S.J.; Polohan, B.; Vrijmoed, L.L.P. Growth and fatty acid production of thraustochytrids from Panay mangroves, Philippines. Fungal Divers. 2003, 12, 111–122. [Google Scholar]
  45. Scanu, B.; Hunter, G.C.; Linaldeddu, B.T.; Franceschini, A.; Maddau, L.; Jung, T.; Denman, S. A taxonomic re-evaluation reveals that Phytophthora cinnamomi and P. cinnamomic var parvispora are separate species. For. Pathol. 2014, 44, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, T.; Chang, T.T.; Bakony, J.; Seress, D.; Perez-Sierra, A.; Yang, X.; Hong, C.; Scanu, B.; Fu, C.H.; Hsueh, K.L.; et al. Diversity of Phytophthora species in natural ecosystems of Taiwan and association with disease symptoms. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 194–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bligh, E.G.; Dyer, W.J. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37, 911–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lepage, G.; Roy, C.C. Improved recovery of fatty acid through direct transesterification without prior extraction or purification. J. Lipid Res. 1984, 25, 1391–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage of total lipids in the nine Halophytophthora species tested. Results are means ± SD (n = 3) Columns marked with the same letter are not statistically different from each other (p ≥ 0.05).
Figure 1. Percentage of total lipids in the nine Halophytophthora species tested. Results are means ± SD (n = 3) Columns marked with the same letter are not statistically different from each other (p ≥ 0.05).
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g001
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative percentages in total fatty acids of the two most abundant SFAs (Myristic and Palmitic acids), the three most abundant PUFAs (9,12-octadecadienoic, Arachidonic and Eicosapentaenoic acids) and the most abundant MUFA (Oleic acid). Results are means ± SD (n = 3). Columns marked with the same letter are not statistically different from each other (p ≥ 0.05).
Figure 2. Relative percentages in total fatty acids of the two most abundant SFAs (Myristic and Palmitic acids), the three most abundant PUFAs (9,12-octadecadienoic, Arachidonic and Eicosapentaenoic acids) and the most abundant MUFA (Oleic acid). Results are means ± SD (n = 3). Columns marked with the same letter are not statistically different from each other (p ≥ 0.05).
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g002
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g003 550
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) loading plots (A,C) and score plots (B,D) of PC1-PC2 (A,B) and PC1-PC3 (C,D). Proportions of variance are shown in brackets. Ovals in the score plots represent the phylogenetic clade and subclades of the species (Clade 4 in grey, Subclade 6a in yellow and Subclade 6b in coral). Dots with the same colour are replicates (n = 3).
Figure 3. Principal component analysis (PCA) loading plots (A,C) and score plots (B,D) of PC1-PC2 (A,B) and PC1-PC3 (C,D). Proportions of variance are shown in brackets. Ovals in the score plots represent the phylogenetic clade and subclades of the species (Clade 4 in grey, Subclade 6a in yellow and Subclade 6b in coral). Dots with the same colour are replicates (n = 3).
Marinedrugs 21 00227 g003
Table
Table 1. Relative composition of fatty acids (FAs) in nine Halophytophthora species (% of total amount of FAs).
Table 1. Relative composition of fatty acids (FAs) in nine Halophytophthora species (% of total amount of FAs).
Fatty Acids 1Halophytophthora Species and Isolate Codes
H. thermoam-bigua BD631H. lusitanica BD632H. lateralis BD680H. frigida
BD675		H. sinuata
BD656		H. macrospo-rangia BD645H. brevispo-rangia BD658H. celeris BD646H. avicennae BD697
C12:0
Lauric acid		ndndndnd0.34 ± 0.590.89 ± 0.78ndnd3.95 ± 0.23
C14:0
Myristic acid		15.56 ± 0.4211.76 ± 0.6414.09 ± 0.3012.55 ± 01714.18 ± 0.5212.93 ± 0.4420.61 ± 0.1516.17 ± 0.3311.93 ± 1.04
C16:0
Palmitic acid		34.50 ± 0.9531.66 ± 0.1633.01 ± 0.4031.86 ± 0.4528.32 ± 1.4026.56 ± 1.3538.63 ± 0.2230.23 ± 0.5532.82 ± 0.99
C18:0
Stearic acid		2.52 ± 0.154.07 ± 0.043.11 ± 0.024.28 ± 0.103.34 ± 0.294.11 ± 0.032.52 ± 0.092.40 ± 0.195.37 ± 0.15
∑ SFA52.5847.5050.2148.7043.6844.9961.7648.8054.06
C16:1
Palmitoleic acid		2.39 ± 0.011.24 ± 0.081.39 ± 0.020.61 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.06nd0.98 ± 0.071.14 ± 0.04
C18:1n9c
Oleic acid		10.86 ± 0.1118.45 ± 0.0918.66 ± 0.1024.69 ± 0.4223.76 ± 1.4218.03 ± 0.4813.79 ± 0.4919.53 ± 0.1419.42 ± 0.38
C22:1n9
Erucic acid		1.72 ± 0.031.61 ± 0.181.32 ± 0.100.22 ± 0.130.83 ± 0.031.19 ± 0.05nd0.40 ± 0.700.87 ± 0.11
∑ MUFA14.9721.3121.3725.5225.2520.0713.7920.9221.42
C18:2n6
9,12-octadecadienoic acid		17.89 ± 0.2517.85 ± 0.2916.71 ± 0.2021.05 ± 0.4322.11 ± 1.2525.80 ± 0.6418.92 ± 0.0721.83 ± 0.4811.11 ± 0.35
C18:3n6
γ-linolenic acid		ndndndndndndndnd2.12 ± 0.11
C20:3n6
Eicosatrienoic acid		1.58 ± 0.052.36 ± 0.201.82 ± 0.17nd0.52 ± 0.450.98 ± 0.05ndnd1.65 ± 0.29
C20:4n6
Arachidonic acid (ARA)		3.89 ± 0.123.48 ± 0.292.57 ± 0.091.80 ± 0.072.58 ± 0.223.00 ± 0.151.93 ± 0.063.00 ± 0.193.05 ± 0.24
C20:5n3
Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)		9.09 ± 0.317.50 ± 0.067.33 ± 0.172.93 ± 0.033.35 ± 0.525.64 ± 0.523.60 ± 0.135.44 ± 0.156.59 ± 0.31
∑ PUFA32.4531.2028.4225.7828.5635.4324.4530.2824.52
1 SFA = saturated FA, MUFA = monounsaturated FA, PUFA = polyunsaturated FA. Values represent means ± SD (n = 3); nd = not detected.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Maia, C.; Jung, T.; Engelen, A.; Jung, M.H.; Custódio, L. Unravelling the Lipids Content and the Fatty Acid Profiles of Eight Recently Described Halophytophthora Species and H. avicennae from the South Coast of Portugal. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040227

AMA Style

Maia C, Jung T, Engelen A, Jung MH, Custódio L. Unravelling the Lipids Content and the Fatty Acid Profiles of Eight Recently Described Halophytophthora Species and H. avicennae from the South Coast of Portugal. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(4):227. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040227

Chicago/Turabian Style

Maia, Cristiana, Thomas Jung, Aschwin Engelen, Marília Horta Jung, and Luísa Custódio. 2023. "Unravelling the Lipids Content and the Fatty Acid Profiles of Eight Recently Described Halophytophthora Species and H. avicennae from the South Coast of Portugal" Marine Drugs 21, no. 4: 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21040227

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop