Next Article in Journal
Expression Profiles of Exosomal MicroRNAs from HEV- and HCV-Infected Blood Donors and Patients: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Characterizations and Molecular Evolution of VP7 Gene in Human Group A Rotavirus G1
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 12
Issue 8
10.3390/v12080832
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Vaginal Virome—Balancing Female Genital Tract Bacteriome, Mucosal Immunity, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes?

by
Anna-Ursula Happel
1,*,
Arvind Varsani
2,3,
Christina Balle
1,
Jo-Ann Passmore
1,4,5 and
Heather Jaspan
1,6,7
1
Department of Pathology, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
2
The Biodesign Center of Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, School of Life Sciences, Center for Evolution and Medicine, Arizona State University, 1001 S. McAllister Ave, Tempe, AZ 85287-5001, USA
3
Structural Biology Research Unit, Department of Integrative Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Infectious Diseases and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
4
NRF-DST CAPRISA Centre of Excellence in HIV Prevention, 719 Umbilo Road, Congella, Durban 4013, South Africa
5
National Health Laboratory Service, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town 7925, South Africa
6
Department of Pediatrics and Global Health, University of Washington, 1510 San Juan Road NE, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
7
Seattle Children’s Research Institute, 307 Westlake Ave N, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2020, 12(8), 832; https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080832
Submission received: 12 June 2020 / Revised: 22 July 2020 / Accepted: 24 July 2020 / Published: 30 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Viruses)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Besides bacteria, fungi, protists and archaea, the vaginal ecosystem also contains a range of prokaryote- and eukaryote-infecting viruses, which are collectively referred to as the “virome”. Despite its well-described role in the gut and other environmental niches, the vaginal virome remains understudied. With a focus on sexual and reproductive health, we summarize the currently known components of the vaginal virome, its relationship with other constituents of the vaginal microbiota and its association with adverse health outcomes. While a range of eukaryote-infecting viruses has been described to be present in the female genital tract (FGT), few prokaryote-infecting viruses have been described. Literature suggests that various vaginal viruses interact with vaginal bacterial microbiota and host immunity and that any imbalance thereof may contribute to the risk of adverse reproductive health outcomes, including infertility and adverse birth outcomes. Current limitations of vaginal virome research include experimental and analytical constraints. Considering the vaginal virome may represent the missing link in our understanding of the relationship between FGT bacteria, mucosal immunity, and adverse sexual and reproductive health outcomes, future studies evaluating the vaginal microbiome and its population dynamics holistically will be important for understanding the role of the vaginal virome in balancing health and disease.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Despite the considerable literature published on bacterial communities, only a few human microbiota studies have focused on viruses, fungi, protists and archaea communities [1,2,3], yet shifts in one community likely modulate community structure of others and vice versa. It is estimated that only about 1% of the human virome has been described at the sequence level [4], and even less has been characterized functionally and hardly any studies have evaluated the virome in relation to reproductive health and the female genital tract (FGT).
From various biological niches, such as the human gut, we know that viruses interact with other components of the microbiota and the human host, consequently influencing human health [5,6,7,8]. However, little is known about the interactions of prokaryote- and eukaryote-infecting DNA and RNA viruses present in the FGT microbiota, collectively making up the vaginal virome, with other components of the vaginal microbiota or the human host, and its consequent impact on health outcomes. The primary outcome of this review was to summarize our current understanding of the pro- and eukaryote-infecting viruses making up the vaginal virome. Secondary outcomes included describing interactions between the vaginal virome and other constituents of the vaginal microbiota, and possible associated adverse health outcomes. The literature search for this non-systematic review was conducted on 31 March 2020, using two databases (PubMed and GoogleScholar), with the search terms (“vagina” OR “female genital tract” OR “female reproductive tract”) AND (“virome” OR “virus” OR “viral” OR “microbiome”) and was limited to studies that were in published in English.

2. Known Components of the Vaginal Virome

2.1. Eukaryote-Infecting Viruses

A range of vaginal DNA viruses infecting eukaryote cells have been identified by shotgun metagenomics of vaginal samples from generally healthy, asymptomatic women of reproductive age participating in the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) [9], including double-stranded (ds) DNA (families Adenoviridae, Herpesviridae, Papillomaviridae and Polyomaviridae) and single-stranded (ss) DNA viruses (families Anelloviridae) (Table 1 and Figure 1). The most common viruses detected in the lower reproductive tract were alphapapillomaviruses, with 38% of the participants being infected with at least one alphapapillomavirus [9]. To date, more than 220 human papillomavirus (HPV) types have been identified, including at least 50 that preferentially infect the genital mucosa [10,11] (Table 1 and Figure 1). Longitudinal sampling in the HMP suggests that up to 50% of these papillomaviruses establish productive infections and were replication competent, as many of the viruses were detected over multiple time points in the same women. Additional dsDNA viruses have been identified in vaginal samples from pregnant women and women with reproductive disorders [12,13,14] that share sequence similarities to those in the families Alloherpesviridae, Iridoviridae, Marseilleviridae, Mimiviridae, Phycodnaviridae and Poxviridae (Table 1 and Figure 1). In a cohort of women undergoing in vitro fertilisation, Herpesviridae, Polyomaviridae, Papillomaviridae and Anelloviridae were present, with Papillomaviridae being the most common virus family detected [15], while in a cohort of sixty pregnant women, anelloviruses were the most commonly detected viruses in vaginal samples, being present in 42% of women screened [12]. In a cohort of women coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and HPV, four viral families were identified in the FGT: Papillomaviridae, Anelloviridae, Genomoviridae and Herpesviridae [16]. Papillomavirus reads were more abundant in women with premalignant cervical lesions, which were also strongly associated with carrying multiple high-risk HPVs, while anellovirus read abundance was negatively correlated with host CD4+ T-cell counts [16]. Similarly, 46 known HPV types were detected in the FGT of women living with HIV, in addition to viruses belonging to the Polyoma- and Anelloviridae families [17]. Whether a core vaginal virome exists or whether differences in vaginal viruses identified in these studies are due to variable demographic or clinical characteristics of the cohorts, to differences in laboratory or sequencing methods, or to the viral databases and viral annotation tools applied remains unclear. To our knowledge, only one sequencing study [13] reported RNA viruses in the reproductive tract, belonging to the Partitiviridae family (dsRNA), of which fungi is the natural host. This is likely to be due to the poor stability of stored RNA and more complex laboratory assays being required to sequence RNA viruses. HIV-1, an ssRNA reverse transcribing virus (ssRNA-RT) in the family of Retroviridae, is also detectable in FGT secretions of women living with HIV during viral shedding [18,19,20].
While none of the women participating in the HMP had any genital symptoms, the high prevalence of eukaryote-infecting vaginal viruses raises the question of whether these vaginal viruses play a role in reproductive health. As the majority of humans remain asymptomatic to some viral infections, it has been proposed that viruses have become part of the metagenome of “healthy” individuals, rarely causing disease and remaining dormant within the host [21]. However, some well-described disease-causing viruses, such as high-risk HPV types, herpes simplex virus (HSV)-2 and polyomaviruses were also described to be part of the vaginal virome of some individuals despite being asymptomatic (Table 1 and Figure 1). Furthermore, viruses that do not overtly cause disease yet establish chronic infections have been shown to influence immunity at other mucosal surfaces, such as the gut [22,23], and this is also likely to occur in the lower reproductive tract and is thus discussed in more detail below.

2.2. Prokaryote-Infecting Viruses

Few shotgun metagenomic studies have investigated the presence or function of prokaryotic viruses in the lower reproductive tract of women. Although prokaryotic-infecting viruses, from now on referred to as bacteriophages, are estimated to be amongst the most abundant living entities on Earth [24] and are thought to play an important role in shaping the bacterial microbiota and associated health outcomes in the human gut [5,25,26,27], oral cavity [28,29], skin [30,31] and lungs [32], their role in the lower reproductive tract is understudied. Functionally, bacteriophages are divided into lytic (virulent) and temperate types based on their differential ability to either lyse host cells (to release progeny bacteriophages) or to incorporate their genomes into the host cell genome as prophages and remain dormant, respectively [33]. Several groups have identified functional and nonfunctional prophages in the genomes of vaginal bacterial species [34,35,36,37,38]. Strong bioinformatic and in vitro evidence indicates that vaginal Lactobacillus strains (including L. crispatus, L. gasseri, L. jensenii and L. plantarum isolates) carry inducible prophages [34,35,36,38]. One third of all vaginal Lactobacillus strains from South African women that have been examined to date were found to harbour at least one prophage, with L. crispatus more commonly harbouring prophages than L. jensenii [36]. For most of these Lactobacillus prophages, however, factors determining their induction and permissive bacterial hosts are yet to be determined.
Prophages have also been described in the genomes of vaginal and urinary bacterial species that have been associated with adverse reproductive health outcomes, including Gardnerella vaginalis [37], Group B Streptococcus (GBS) [39] and Enterococcus spp. [40]. Among 39 Gardnerella strains, a species associated with bacterial vaginosis (BV), more than 400 annotated prophage sequences have been identified and evidence of ongoing prophage acquisition within these Gardnerella populations was present [37]. Another study found that almost 90% of the examined genomes of vaginal and urinary Gardnerella strains contained at least one prophage sequence [40]. Similarly, almost 80% of GBS isolates had at least one prophage, which carried genes encoding factors previously associated with host adaptation and virulence [39]. The high abundance of prophage sequences within the genomes of vaginal bacterial species suggests that bacteriophages might play a role in shaping the bacterial microbiota of the FGT and associated health outcomes, similar to other biological niches. Recent metagenomic sequencing of vaginal samples revealed that the majority of identified vaginal DNA viruses are dsDNA bacteriophages, similar to those in the families Myo-, Podo- and Siphoviridae [14]. In addition, various unclassified viruses within the order Caudovirales were found to be present. Notably, only 4% of vaginal viruses identified by metagenomic sequencing by Jakobsen et al. (2019) targeted eukaryotes [14], confirming the high abundance of prokaryote-infecting viruses within the FGT microbiota (Table 1 and Figure 1). Considering that a shift from lysogeny to a lytic lifecycle has been correlated with disease within the gut microbiota [41], the role of bacteriophages for FGT health remains a crucially important yet underexplored area.

3. Interaction of the Vaginal Virome with Other Components of the Vaginal Microbiota and Human Host

3.1. Interactions between the Viral and Bacterial Microbiota

Limited studies have examined the interactions between all components of the vaginal microbiota and the human host. Observational studies have shown that the acquisition and transmission of viral sexually transmitted infections (STIs), including HSV-2, HPV and HIV, are more common in women with high diversity, nonoptimal vaginal bacterial microbiota [42,43,44]. However, many studies did not adjust for confounders to this relationship, such as the presence of other STIs, sexual risk behaviour (condomless sex) and circumcision status of sexual partners. Recent evidence from longitudinal studies suggests that changes in the bacterial microbiota and associated immunomodulatory metabolites precede incidental STIs [45] and have been associated with a higher rate of HPV persistence and genital HSV-2 shedding [43]. Data from the HMP further indicated that alpha-papillomaviruses were more common in women with a high vaginal bacterial diversity than in those who had a Lactobacillus-dominant microbiota [9]. Strong co-abundances between bacteriophages and predicted bacterial hosts were observed in a metagenomic study [14], further suggesting that viral and bacterial communities interact within the lower reproductive tract. As such, links between viral community composition and the presence of L. crispatus, L. iners, G, vaginalis and A. vaginae in the FGT were found [14]. Diversity changes in the vaginal eukaryotic DNA virome over the course of pregnancy appeared similar to concomitant changes in the vaginal bacteriome, and pregnant women with highly diverse vaginal viromes tended to also have highly diverse vaginal bacteriomes [12]. While a relationship between bacterial and viral communities within the human lower reproductive tract appears to be supported by these studies, the directionality of this relationship is not clear and causality is yet to be established. It remains to be determined if changes in the bacterial microbiota are driven by changes in the viral community structure, or if susceptibility, persistence and clearance of viral infections is influenced by the vaginal bacterial microbiota. It is also important to acknowledge that underlying indirect mechanisms may regulate both, bacterial and viral communities, in addition to a more direct microbial mechanism implied by available studies.

3.2. Interactions between the Viral and Fungal Microbiota

There is clinical and in vitro evidence that the vaginal bacterial microbiota influences colonisation with fungal strains [46,47], albeit studies investigating yeast–viral interactions in the FGT are limited. The majority of available research of yeast–viral interactions focuses on the relationship between viral STIs and Candida coinfections, in which vaginal Candida infection was investigated as a risk factor for HIV transmission [48,49]. However, this is likely to be the results of mucosal barrier disruption and/or inflammation associated with vulvovaginal candidiasis. Seventy-five percent of women experience at least one episode of candidiasis during their life, and the risk for frequent, more invasive and resistant infections in persons living with HIV is high, likely due to T cell immune defects [50]. Other in vitro studies have shown that HSV-2 significantly enhances binding of Candida albicans to HeLa cells [51], which the authors conclude suggests that HSV-2 increases Candida persistence in the FGT. Interestingly, in vitro studies have also shown that HSV-1 and coxsackievirus-B5 were retained in and released by C. albicans biofilms, in which the viruses remained viable and protected from antiviral agents as well host factors [52]. Pseudomonas phages have been described to inhibit C. albicans biofilms as well as their planktonic growth [53]. Whether yeast-infecting bacteriophages are commonly present in the vagina is unknown, although as mentioned previously, Partitiviridae, typically a fungal phage, have been identified in the female reproductive tract [13]. In turn, HSV-1 has been shown to protect C. albicans by downregulating monocyte-mediated anti-Candida immune system responses [54], suggesting bilateral interactions between fungal and viral communities in the FGT. HIV-1 envelope and transactivating proteins have also been shown to bind to C. albicans, which may promote fungal virulence by inducing hyphae formation [55,56,57]. Although the clinical relevance of these in vitro results remains to be elucidated and research on a broader range of vaginal viruses and fungi is needed, these studies suggest that there may be clinically relevant interactions between viral and fungal communities in the FGT and that an imbalance between these may influence reproductive health.

3.3. Interactions between Virome and Host Immunity

Microbial communities also interact with the host and influence innate immunity, immune cell activation and cytokine secretion. A balanced interplay between the vaginal microbiome and host immunity is crucial to prevent infections on the one hand but to maintain an immunotolerant environment, particularly during pregnancy, on the other hand. While the interaction of the vaginal bacteriome with the host has been reviewed by others [43,58,59], there are less data available on the effect of eukaryote-infecting viruses other than viral STIs, prokaryote-infecting viruses and the collective virome on host immunity. The innate immune system, including epithelial cells and mucus, Toll-like receptors, antimicrobial peptides and defensins, cytokines and innate immune cells, is an important host immune defence mechanism in the FGT, collectively minimizing the risk of viral infection upon exposure [60,61]. Similarly, cellular and humoral adaptive immune responses to viral STIs have been described in detail. While HIV-1 infection leads to induction of CD8+ T-cell responses in the cervical mucosa [61], HSV-2 infection has been associated with cervical CD4+ T cell numbers and a distinct cytokine profile including various cytokines without significant alterations in local proinflammatory cytokines [42], and HPV infection has been associated with a T helper (Th) 1 cytokine immune response and elevated proinflammatory and regulatory cytokines [62,63,64]. In germ-free mice, expansion of enteric bacteriophages has been linked to immune cell expansion and increased inflammation in the gut, and phage DNA isolated from human faeces stimulated interferon (IFN)-γ production by dendritic cells in mice [8]. Further, certain viruses may be important for conditioning of immune responses. In the gut, infection by a persistent strain of murine norovirus compensated for the absence of bacteria in germ-free mice by restoring intestinal morphology and by promoting lymphocyte differentiation [22]. The same virus protected mice from lung injury following infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and restored serum immunoglobulins in germ-free mice to levels observed in conventional mice [65], yet the relevance of these findings for humans and specifically the FGT remains to be confirmed.
These initial studies point towards an important role of the vaginal virome in innate and adaptive immunity of the FGT. While many of these initial findings are based primarily on disease-associated viruses, they may suggest that changes in the collective virome may similarly lead to altered mucosal immunity in the FGT and thus may impact sexual and reproductive health outcomes.

4. The Vaginal Virome and Adverse Sexual and Reproductive Outcomes

4.1. Eukaryotic-Infecting Viruses

As reviewed elsewhere, sexually transmitted viruses, like HSV-2, HPV, cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis B or HIV, have been associated with a range of adverse health outcomes [66,67,68,69,70,71], including cervical cancer (HPV) [66], genital ulcers (HSV-2), aseptic meningitis as well as vertical infections in infants, such as neonatal herpes (HSV-2) [67] or cirrhosis and liver cancer (hepatitis B) [69,70].

4.2. Bacterial Vaginosis

BV is a risk factor for severe reproductive complications [72,73,74] and STIs [49,75,76], and it has been suggested by several authors [34,77,78] that bacteriophages are a contributing underlying biological cause for the rapid change in composition of vaginal bacterial communities associated with onset of BV and its difficulty to treat. With advances in shotgun metagenomics, further evidence is emerging that eukaryote- and prokaryote-infecting DNA viruses, including bacteriophage communities, may differ between women with and without BV [14], although others previously did not find any differences by vaginal bacterial community state type [44], possibly due to different laboratory and analysis methods used. Jakobsen et al. (2019) found that, while no significant difference in overall viral alpha diversity was present between groups, bacteriophage operational taxonomic units (OTUs) and predicted bacterial host OTUs strongly correlated in women with BV. Miller-Ensminger et al. (2018) observed variations between the prophage populations of women with and without overreactive bladder symptoms, suggesting that bacteriophages may contribute to genitourinary health [40].

4.3. Infertility

Infertility is defined by the failure to establish pregnancy after 12 months of regular sexual intercourse. While the most predictive factor for female infertility is a woman’s age, biological and environmental factors are believed to contribute as well [79]. Changes in the vaginal bacterial microbiota have been described as a risk factor for infertility [80,81,82], and it is likely that viruses, such as human herpesviruses (HHV), also play a role. In up to 20% of infertile couples, the male or female partner had urogenital bacterial infections [83], and in agreement with older women being more likely to be infertile, it has been described that seroprevalence of HHV-8, which similarly to HHV-6 can be transmitted via saliva, is increasing with increasing age [84]. HHV-6 DNA was found in 43% of endometrial epithelial cells from infertile women in contrast to being completely absent from the endometrium of fertile women [85,86]. HHV-6A-specific endometrial Natural Killer (NK) cell numbers and cytokine responses were elevated in women who had HHV-6A present [85], suggesting that HHV-6 infections may modify endometrial immune cell and inflammatory profiles, resulting in the inability to sustain a successful pregnancy. Further, endometrial NK cells had increased expression of several chemokine receptors and endometrial epithelial cells upmodulated the corresponding ligands, including Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1 (MCP1 and CCL2), Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10 (IP-10 and CXCL10) and Eotaxin-3 (CCL26) [86]. Others assessed whether HHV-6 played a role in preventing embryo implantation and found that 50% of women with two or more failed embryo transfers had detectable HHV-6 late viral proteins in endometrial epithelial cells and that women who were HHV-6 positive had undergone significantly more failed transfers than those who were HHV-6 negative [87], further providing evidence that HHV-6 infection might influence fertility and pregnancy outcomes.
In subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilisation with a fresh embryo transfer, an association of the eukaryotic vaginal virome with prophylactic antibiotic exposure and reproductive outcomes has been described [15]. While there was no association between viral diversity and clinical pregnancy overall, a higher diversity of herpesviruses and alphapapillomaviruses was present in women who received prophylactic azithromycin treatment compared to women not receiving azithromycin. Further, in women receiving azithromycin, viral diversity was higher in women whose embryo transfer did not result in clinical pregnancy compared with those who achieved clinical pregnancy [15], suggesting that both bacterial and viral components of the vaginal microbiota may influence the ability to achieve clinical pregnancy.

4.4. Adverse Birth Outcomes

A number of clinically relevant viruses can be vertically transmitted from mothers to their foetus, including Zika virus, HIV, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, HSV-1 and -2, varicella zoster virus, Rubella virus, parvovirus B19 and CMV, and can cause stillbirth or severe morbidity in infants [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. In the context of preterm birth (PTB) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) births, biological mechanisms are still poorly understood. Sequence-based studies of the vaginal bacterial microbiota have revealed that high-diversity bacterial communities [95,96,97] and possibly increased concentrations of vaginal inflammatory markers [95,98] might contribute to increased risk for these adverse birth outcomes (ABOs). Recently, a higher richness of the vaginal eukaryotic DNA virome, including viral sequences similar to those in the families Adenoviridae, Anelloviridae, Herpesviridae, Papillomaviridae, Polyomaviridae and Poxviridae, has been linked to spontaneous and medically indicated PTB in North American women, but not one specific virus or group of viruses could be linked to PTB [12]. Having both high bacterial and viral diversity in the first trimester of pregnancy was linked to the highest risk for PTB, indicating that the interplay of bacterial and viral communities or an imbalance thereof may be a mechanism by which PTB is triggered. Neither whether higher viral diversity would also be associated with PTB in other populations nor how demographic factors influence the vaginal virome during pregnancy, are clear.
Focusing on specific viral groups rather than the collective virome, vaginal HPV infections have been linked to SGA and low birth weight in observational studies, independently of other risk factors [99,100]. In silico analyses have revealed significant associations between invasive neonatal-infecting GBS isolates and harbouring of a specific group of prophages within their genomes [39]. Various viruses were also identified in amniotic fluid samples obtained from pregnancies with adverse outcomes, with adenovirus, CMV and enterovirus being the most common, while few healthy pregnancy controls had any virus detected [101]. More than half of women delivering infants with intrauterine growth restriction had viruses in their amniotic fluid during pregnancy, and adenovirus was detected in the amniotic fluid collected by amniocentesis in 60% of these women [101]. Culture- and sequencing-based studies have found evidence of bacterial colonisation in amniotic fluid from pregnancies with ABOs [102,103,104], suggesting that similarly viruses might be present in amniotic fluid in pregnancies with adverse outcomes, where anatomical, physiological or immunological barriers are compromised. It remains to be determined whether bacterial and viral communities are present in amniotic fluid from healthy pregnancies, as recent sequencing-based studies have drawn conflicting conclusions [105,106,107,108].
It also has been shown in vitro that adenoviral infection of extravillous trophoblast cells in the presence of maternal decidual lymphocytes induces trophoblast apoptosis [109], indicating that the maternal inflammatory response to adenovirus might induce placental cell death and subsequent ABO. In mouse models of pregnancy, however, a combination of bacteria and eukaryotic-infecting viruses induced PTB, but neither alone was capable of causing PTB [110,111]. Similarly, viral infection of the murine cervix and placenta has been shown to alter the inflammatory responses to subsequent bacterial infection of the FGT [110,111,112], indicating that viral infection of the FGT during pregnancy may alter the capacity to control ascending bacterial infections, which subsequently may lead to ABO.
Data relating to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection of the FGT and the consequent relationship with pregnancy outcomes is sparse but continually accruing. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 79 pregnant women with coronavirus-related symptoms, of which half had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, reported a significant prevalence of placenta-mediated disorders with high rates of miscarriage, PTB, preeclampsia and foetal growth restrictions [113]. While there is currently still conflicting yet continuously accumulating evidence for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in vaginal secretions, amniotic fluid, cord blood or breastmilk in infected women [114,115,116,117], infection and visualization of SARS-CoV-2 in placental tissue has been demonstrated thoroughly [116,118]. The first case of transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from a pregnant woman affected by COVID-19 during late pregnancy to her neonate has been described [116], suggesting potential perinatal SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Further investigations are warranted to confirm vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and long-term consequences thereof.

5. Limitations of Current Research

The growing interest in the field of vaginal virome requires standardisation of laboratory protocols and analysis pipelines, including identification of RNA viruses, adequate use of negative controls to account for contamination with environmental viruses, continued development of high-throughput sequencing accessibility, and advancement in viral annotation databases and tools. Adequate use of viral nucleic acid extraction methods or kits that have not been associated with contamination as well as removal of bacterial and human nucleic acids either during the extraction process or after sequencing are crucial. It is concerning that various sequencing-based studies have described the presence of viruses in the FGT that share similarities to nonhuman, nonbacterial and nonfungal virus families. For example, vaginal Iridoviridae have been described, which were previously only thought to infect ectothermic vertebrates, insects and crustaceans [119]. Similarly, Phycodnaviridae were also described to be present in vaginal samples, which were previously only thought to infect algae [120]. While this suggests that these viral sequences might have been present due to contamination or might have been incorrectly taxonomically classified or that they share similarities to sequences of viruses in these families (since there are clearly protein homologues found across viral families, especially the RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, helicase domains of replication proteins and, in some cases, capsid proteins [121]), it might be possible that these findings are real due to vaginal insertional or hygiene practices. Further, analysis of low biomass samples, such as breastmilk, placenta or amniotic fluid, requires rigorous use of controls, including nucleic acid extraction and PCR controls, as well as environmental swabs collected and processed as samples as additional negative controls.

6. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

There is a paucity of research on the vaginal virome and the interplay of vaginal bacterial and viral communities and host immunity and its likely effect on sexual and reproductive health outcomes. Once systematic laboratory and analysis pipelines have been established for both DNA and particularly RNA viruses, the vaginal virome should be characterized in broader populations, such as pre- and postmenopausal women and women from different demographics, and in connection with other components of the vaginal microbiota and the human host. Functional characterization of viruses present in the vaginal virome and evaluation of their effect on reproductive and sexual health outcomes are crucial, and highly detailed longitudinal clinical cohorts with frequent sampling or animal models will be required to assess causality.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.-U.H. and H.J.; investigation: A.-U.H., A.V. and H.J.; writing—original draft preparation: A.-U.H.; writing—review and editing: A.V., C.B., J.-A.P. and H.J.; supervision: A.V. and H.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review was funded in part by R01 HD083040-02S1.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ABOAdverse birth outcome
BKPyVBK polyomavirus
BVBacterial vaginosis
CMVCytomegalovirus
dsDNADouble-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid
dsRNADouble-stranded ribonucleic acid
FGTFemale genital tract
GBSGroup B Streptococcus
HHVHuman Herpesvirus
HHVHuman Herpesvirus
HIVHuman immunodeficiency virus
HMPHuman Microbiome Project
HPVHuman papillomavirus
HSVHerpes simplex virus
IFNInterferon
IP-10Interferon Gamma-induced Protein 10
JCPyVJC polyomavirus
MCP1Monocyte Chemotactic Protein 1
MCPyVMerkel cell polyomavirus
NKNatural killer
PTBPreterm birth
ssDNASingle-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid
ssRNA-RTReverse transcribing single-stranded ribonucleic acid
SARS-CoV-2Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2
SGASmall-for-gestational age
STISexually transmitted infection
ThT helper
OTUOperational taxonomic unit

References

  1. Ma, B.; France, M.T.; Crabtree, J.; Holm, J.B.; Humphrys, M.S.; Brotman, R.M.; Ravel, J. A comprehensive non-redundant gene catalog reveals extensive within-community intraspecies diversity in the human vagina. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Dridi, B.; Raoult, D.; Drancourt, M. Archaea as emerging organisms in complex human microbiomes. Anaerobe 2011, 17, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Belay, N.; Mukhopadhyay, B.; Conway de Macario, E.; Galask, R.; Daniels, L. Methanogenic bacteria in human vaginal samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28, 1666–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Virgin, H.W. The virome in mammalian physiology and disease. Cell 2014, 157, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wagner, J.; Maksimovic, J.; Farries, G.; Sim, W.H.; Bishop, R.F.; Cameron, D.J.; Catto-smith, A.G.; Kirkwood, C.D. Bacteriophages in Gut Samples From Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Patients: Metagenomic Analysis Using 454 Pyrosequencing. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2013, 19, 1598–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Norman, J.M.; Handley, S.A.; Baldridge, M.T.; Droit, L.; Liu, C.Y.; Keller, B.C.; Kambal, A.; Monaco, C.L.; Zhao, G.; Fleshner, P.; et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell 2015, 160, 447–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Monaco, C.L.; Gootenberg, D.B.; Zhao, G.; Handley, S.A.; Ghebremichael, M.S.; Lim, E.S.; Lankowski, A.; Baldridge, M.T.; Wilen, C.B.; Flagg, M.; et al. Altered Virome and Bacterial Microbiome in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Associated Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Cell Host Microbe 2016, 19, 311–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Gogokhia, L.; Buhrke, K.; Bell, R.; Hoffman, B.; Brown, D.G.; Hanke-Gogokhia, C.; Ajami, N.J.; Wong, M.C.; Ghazaryan, A.; Valentine, J.F.; et al. Expansion of Bacteriophages Is Linked to Aggravated Intestinal Inflammation and Colitis. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 25, 285–299.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Wylie, K.M.; Mihindukulasuriya, K.A.; Zhou, Y.; Sodergren, E.; Storch, G.A.; Weinstock, G.M. Metagenomic analysis of double-stranded DNA viruses in healthy adults. BMC Biol. 2014, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schmitt, M.; Depuydt, C.; Benoy, I.; Bogers, J.; Antoine, J.; Arbyn, M.; Pawlita, M.; Group, on behalf of the V.S. Prevalence and viral load of 51 genital human papillomavirus types and three subtypes. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 132, 2395–2403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karolinska-Institutet International Human Papillomavirus Reference Center. Available online: https://www.hpvcenter.se/human_reference_clones/ (accessed on 18 May 2020).
  12. Wylie, K.M.; Wylie, T.N.; Cahill, A.G.; Macones, G.A.; Tuuli, M.G.; Stout, M.J. The vaginal eukaryotic DNA virome and preterm birth. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 219, 189.e1–189.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Li, F.; Chen, C.; Wei, W.; Wang, Z.; Dai, J.; Hao, L.; Song, L.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, L.; Du, H.; et al. The metagenome of the female upper reproductive tract. Gigascience 2018, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jakobsen, R.R.; Haahr, T.; Humaidan, P.; Jensen, J.S.; Kot, W.; Castro-Mejia, J.; Deng, L.; Leser, T.D.; Nielsen, D.S. Characterization of the vaginal DNA virome in health and dysbiosis: An opening study in patients with non-female factor infertility. bioRxiv 2019, 755710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Eskew, A.M.; Stout, M.J.; Bedrick, B.S.; Riley, J.K.; Omurtag, K.R.; Jimenez, P.T.; Odem, R.R.; Ratts, V.S.; Keller, S.L.; Jungheim, E.S.; et al. Association of the eukaryotic vaginal virome with prophylactic antibiotic exposure and reproductive outcomes in a subfertile population undergoing in vitro fertilisation: A prospective exploratory study. BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 127, 208–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Siqueira, J.D.; Curty, G.; Xutao, D.; Hofer, C.B.; Machado, E.S.; Seuánez, H.N.; Soares, M.A.; Delwart, E.; Soares, E.A. Composite analysis of the virome and bacteriome of HIV/HPV co-infected women reveals proxies for immunodeficiency. Viruses 2019, 11, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Ameur, A.; Meiring, T.L.; Bunikis, I.; Häggqvist, S.; Lindau, C.; Lindberg, J.H.; Gustavsson, I.; Mbulawa, Z.Z.A.; Williamson, A.-L.; Gyllensten, U. Comprehensive profiling of the vaginal microbiome in HIV positive women using massive parallel semiconductor sequencing. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Grignolo, S.; Bruzzone, B.; Gabbi, L.; Gerbaldo, D.; Gallo, F.; Nigro, N.; Icardi, G.; Viscoli, C.; Di Biagio, A. Vaginal HIV-1 shedding among HIV-1 infected women in the current era of combined antiretroviral therapy: A cross sectional study. Virulence 2017, 8, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Kovacs, A.; Wasserman, S.S.; Burns, D.; Wright, D.J.; Cohn, J.; Landay, A.; Weber, K.; Cohen, M.; Levine, A.; Minkoff, H.; et al. Determinants of HIV-1 shedding in the genital tract of women. Lancet 2001, 358, 1593–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bull, M.E.; Legard, J.; Tapia, K.; Sorensen, B.; Cohn, S.E.; Garcia, R.; Holte, S.E.; Coombs, R.W.; Hitti, J.E. HIV-1 shedding from the female genital tract is associated with increased Th1 cytokines/chemokines that maintain tissue homeostasis and proportions of CD8+FOXP3+ T cells. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2014, 67, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Pfeiffer, J.K.; Virgin, H.W. Viral immunity. Transkingdom control of viral infection and immunity in the mammalian intestine. Science 2016, 351, aad5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kernbauer, E.; Ding, Y.; Cadwell, K. An enteric virus can replace the beneficial function of commensal bacteria. Nature 2014, 516, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Metzger, R.N.; Krug, A.B.; Eisenächer, K. Enteric Virome Sensing-Its Role in Intestinal Homeostasis and Immunity. Viruses 2018, 10, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Labrie, S.J.; Samson, J.E.; Moineau, S. Bacteriophage resistance mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Manrique, P.; Bolduc, B.; Walk, S.T.; Van Der Oost, J.; De Vos, W.M.; Young, M.J. Healthy human gut phageome. PNAS 2016, 113, 10400–10405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lepage, P.; Colombet, J.; Marteau, P.; Some-Ngando, T.; Dore, J.; Leclerc, M. Dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease: A role for bacteriophages ? Gut Lett. 2008, 57, 424–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Parkes, G.C.; Whelan, K.; Lindsay, J.O. Smoking in inflammatory bowel disease: Impact on disease course and insights into the aetiology of its effect. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2014, 8, 717–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pride, D.T.; Salzman, J.; Haynes, M.; Rohwer, F.; Davis-long, C.; Iii, R.A.W.; Loomer, P.; Armitage, G.C.; Relman, D.A. Evidence of a robust resident bacteriophage population revealed through analysis of the human salivary virome. ISME J. 2012, 6, 915–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Willner, D.; Furlan, M.; Schmieder, R.; Grasis, J.A.; Pride, D.T.; Relman, D.A.; Angly, F.E.; McDole, T.; Mariella, R.P.; Rohwer, F.; et al. Metagenomic detection of phage-encoded platelet- binding factors in the human oral cavity. PNAS 2011, 108, 4547–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Marinelli, L.J.; Fitz-gibbon, S.; Hayes, C.; Marinelli, L.J.; Fitz-gibbon, S.; Hayes, C.; Bowman, C.; Inkeles, M.; Loncaric, A.; Russell, D.A. Propionibacterium acnes Bacteriophages Display Limited Genetic Diversity and Broad Killing Activity against Bacterial Skin Isolates. MBio 2012, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, J.; Yan, R.; Zhong, Q.; Ngo, S.; Bangayan, N.J.; Nguyen, L.; Lui, T.; Liu, M.; Erfe, M.C.; Craft, N.; et al. The diversity and host interactions of Propionibacterium acnes bacteriophages on human skin. ISME J. 2015, 9, 2078–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Segura-Wang, M.; Gorzer, I.; Jaksch, P.; Puchhammer-Stockl, E. Temporal dynamics of the lung and plasma viromes in lung transplant recipients. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hobbs, Z.; Abedon, S.T. Diversity of phage infection types and associated terminology: The problem with ‘Lytic or lysogenic’ . FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2016, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Pavlova, S.I.; Tao, L. Induction of vaginal Lactobacillus phages by the cigarette smoke chemical benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Mutat. Res. 2000, 466, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kilic, A.O.; Pavlova, S.I.; Alpay, S.; Kilic, S.S.; Tao, L. Comparative Study of Vaginal Lactobacillus Phages Isolated from Women in the United States and Turkey: Prevalence, Morphology, Host Range, and DNA Homology. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2001, 8, 31–39. Available online: http://cvi.asm.org/ (accessed on 13 February 2018). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Damelin, L.H.; Paximadis, M.; Mavri-damelin, D.; Birkhead, M.; Lewis, D.A.; Tiemessen, C.T. Identification of predominant culturable vaginal Lactobacillus species and associated bacteriophages from women with and without vaginal discharge syndrome in South Africa. J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 60, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Malki, K.; Shapiro, J.W.; Price, T.K.; Hilt, E.E.; Thomas-white, K.; Sircar, T.; Rosenfeld, A.B.; Kuffel, G.; Zilliox, M.J.; Wolfe, A.J.; et al. Genomes of Gardnerella Strains Reveal an Abundance of Prophages within the Bladder Microbiome. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0166757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Martín, R.; Soberón, N.; Escobedo, S.; Suárez, J.E. Bacteriophage induction versus vaginal homeostasis: Role of H2O2 in the selection of Lactobacillus defective prophages. Int. Microbiol. 2009, 12, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. van der Mee-Marquet, N.; Diene, S.M.; Barbera, L.; Courtier-Martinez, L.; Lafont, L.; Ouachée, A.; Valentin, A.-S.; Dos Santos, S.; Quentin, R.; François, P. Analysis of the prophages carried by human infecting isolates provides new insight into the evolution of Group B Streptococcus species. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2018, 24, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Miller-Ensminger, T.; Garretto, A.; Brenner, J.; Thomas-White, K.; Zambom, A.; Wolfe, A.J.; Putonti, C. Bacteriophages of the Urinary Microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 2018, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Manrique, P.; Dills, M.; Young, M.J. The Human Gut Phage Community and Its Implications for Health and Disease. Viruses 2017, 9, 141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Shannon, B.; Gajer, P.; Yi, T.J.; Ma, B.; Humphrys, M.S.; Thomas-Pavanel, J.; Chieza, L.; Janakiram, P.; Saunders, M.; Tharao, W.; et al. Distinct Effects of the Cervicovaginal Microbiota and Herpes Simplex Type 2 Infection on Female Genital Tract Immunology. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, 1366–1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Torcia, M.G. Interplay among Vaginal Microbiome, Immune Response and Sexually Transmitted Viral Infections. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gosmann, C.; Anahtar, M.N.; Handley, S.A.; Farcasanu, M.; Abu-Ali, G.; Bowman, B.A.; Padavattan, N.; Desai, C.; Droit, L.; Moodley, A.; et al. Lactobacillus-Deficient Cervicovaginal Bacterial Communities Are Associated with Increased HIV Acquisition in Young South African Women. Immunity 2017, 46, 29–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Brotman, R. S11.3 The vaginal microenvironment prior to incident STI. Sex. Transm. Infect. 2019, 95, A19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jang, S.J.; Lee, K.; Kwon, B.; You, H.J.; Ko, G. Vaginal lactobacilli inhibit growth and hyphae formation of Candida albicans. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Tortelli, B.A.; Lewis, W.G.; Allsworth, J.E.; Member-Meneh, N.; Foster, L.R.; Reno, H.E.; Peipert, J.F.; Fay, J.C.; Lewis, A.L. Associations between the vaginal microbiome and Candida colonization in women of reproductive age. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 222, 471.e1–471.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hester, R.A.; Kennedy, S.B. Candida infection as a risk factor for HIV transmission. J. Womens Health (Larchmt) 2003, 12, 487–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. van de Wijgert, J.H.H.M.; Morrison, C.S.; Cornelisse, P.G.A.; Munjoma, M.; Moncada, J.; Awio, P.; Wang, J.; Van der Pol, B.; Chipato, T.; Salata, R.A.; et al. Bacterial Vaginosis and Vaginal Yeast, But Not Vaginal Cleansing, Increase HIV-1 Acquisition in African Women. JAIDS J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2008, 48, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Apalata, T.; Carr, W.H.; Sturm, W.A.; Longo-Mbenza, B.; Moodley, P. Determinants of Symptomatic Vulvovaginal Candidiasis among Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infected Women in Rural KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 2014, 2014, 387070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Plotkin, B.J.; Sigar, I.M.; Tiwari, V.; Halkyard, S. Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Modulation of Staphylococcus aureus and Candida albicans Initiation of HeLa 299 Cell-Associated Biofilm. Curr. Microbiol. 2016, 72, 529–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mazaheritehrani, E.; Sala, A.; Orsi, C.F.; Neglia, R.G.; Morace, G.; Blasi, E.; Cermelli, C. Human pathogenic viruses are retained in and released by Candida albicans biofilm in vitro. Virus Res. 2014, 179, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nazik, H.; Joubert, L.-M.; Secor, P.R.; Sweere, J.M.; Bollyky, P.L.; Sass, G.; Cegelski, L.; Stevens, D.A. Pseudomonas phage inhibition of Candida albicans. Microbiology 2017, 163, 1568–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Cermelli, C.; Orsi, C.F.; Ardizzoni, A.; Lugli, E.; Cenacchi, V.; Cossarizza, A.; Blasi, E. Herpes simplex virus type 1 dysregulates anti-fungal defenses preventing monocyte activation and downregulating toll-like receptor-2. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 52, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gruber, A.; Lell, C.P.; Speth, C.; Stoiber, H.; Lass-Flörl, C.; Sonneborn, A.; Ernst, J.F.; Dierich, M.P.; Würzner, R. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat binds to Candida albicans, inducing hyphae but augmenting phagocytosis in vitro. Immunology 2001, 104, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Würzner, R.; Gruber, A.; Stoiber, H.; Spruth, M.; Chen, Y.-H.; Lukasser-Vogl, E.; Schwendinger, M.G.; Dierich, M.P. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp41 Binds to Candida albicans via Complement C3-like Region. J. Infect. Dis. 1997, 176, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Gruber, A.; Lukasser-Vogl, E.; Zepelin, M.B.; Dierich, M.P.; Würzner, R. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp160 and gp41 Binding to Candida albicans Selectively Enhances Candidal Virulence In Vitro. J. Infect. Dis. 1998, 177, 1057–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Murphy, K.; Mitchell, C.M.; Hospital, M.G.; Hospital, M.G. The interplay of host immunity and environment on risk of bacterial vaginosisand associated reproductive health outcomes. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 214 (Suppl. S1), S29–S35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Muzny, C.A.; Laniewski, P.; Schwebke, J.R.; Herbst-Kralovetz, M.M. Host-vaginal microbiota interactions in the pathogenesis of bacterial vaginosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 33, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amjadi, F.; Salehi, E.; Mehdizadeh, M.; Aflatoonian, R. Role of the innate immunity in female reproductive tract. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2014, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nguyen, P.V.; Kafka, J.K.; Ferreira, V.H.; Roth, K.; Kaushic, C. Innate and adaptive immune responses in male and female reproductive tracts in homeostasis and following HIV infection. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 410–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Campos, A.C.C.; Murta, E.F.C.; Michelin, M.A.; Reis, C. Evaluation of Cytokines in Endocervical Secretion and Vaginal pH from Women with Bacterial Vaginosis or Human Papillomavirus. ISRN Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 2012, 342075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Scott, M.E.; Shvetsov, Y.B.; Thompson, P.J.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Zhu, X.; Wilkens, L.R.; Killeen, J.; Vo, D.D.; Moscicki, A.-B.; Goodman, M.T. Cervical cytokines and clearance of incident human papillomavirus infection: Hawaii HPV cohort study. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 1187–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Liebenberg, L.J.P.; McKinnon, L.R.; Yende-Zuma, N.; Garrett, N.; Baxter, C.; Kharsany, A.B.M.; Archary, D.; Rositch, A.; Samsunder, N.; Mansoor, L.E.; et al. HPV infection and the genital cytokine milieu in women at high risk of HIV acquisition. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Thépaut, M.; Grandjean, T.; Hober, D.; Lobert, P.-E.; Bortolotti, P.; Faure, K.; Dessein, R.; Kipnis, E.; Guery, B. Protective role of murine norovirus against Pseudomonas aeruginosa acute pneumonia. Vet. Res. 2015, 46, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lee, L.-Y.; Garland, S.M. Human papillomavirus vaccination: The population impact. F1000Research 2017, 6, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Spicknall, I.H.; Looker, K.J.; Gottlieb, S.L.; Chesson, H.W.; Schiffer, J.T.; Elmes, J.; Boily, M.-C. Review of mathematical models of HSV-2 vaccination: Implications for vaccine development. Vaccine 2019, 37, 7396–7407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Looker, K.J.; Elmes, J.A.R.; Gottlieb, S.L.; Schiffer, J.T.; Vickerman, P.; Turner, K.M.E.; Boily, M.-C. Effect of HSV-2 infection on subsequent HIV acquisition: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 1303–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Si, J.; Yu, C.; Guo, Y.; Bian, Z.; Meng, R.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Jin, J.; Liu, J.; Guo, Z.; et al. Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and total and cause-specific mortality: A prospective cohort study of 0.5 million people. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e027696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Sangkomkamhang, U.S.; Lumbiganon, P.; Laopaiboon, M. Hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy for preventing infant infection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lanzieri, T.M.; Dollard, S.C.; Bialek, S.R.; Grosse, S.D. Systematic review of the birth prevalence of congenital cytomegalovirus infection in developing countries. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2014, 22, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Clark, P.; Kurtzer, T.; Duff, P. Role of Bacterial Vaginosis in Peripartum Infections. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1994, 2, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Nelson, D.B.; Hanlon, A.; Nachamkin, I.; Haggerty, C.; Mastrogiannis, D.S.; Liu, C.; Fredricks, D.N. Early pregnancy changes in bacterial vaginosis-associated bacteria and preterm delivery. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2014, 28, 88–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Haggerty, C.L.; Hillier, S.L.; Bass, D.C.; Ness, R.B.; Evaluation, P.I.D.; study investigators, C.H. Bacterial vaginosis and anaerobic bacteria are associated with endometritis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39, 990–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Cohen, C.R.; Lingappa, J.R.; Baeten, J.M.; Ngayo, M.O.; Spiegel, C.A.; Hong, T.; Donnell, D.; Celum, C.; Kapiga, S.; Delany, S.; et al. Bacterial vaginosis associated with increased risk of female-to-male HIV-1 transmission: A prospective cohort analysis among african couples. PLoS Med. 2012, 9, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Anahtar, M.N.; Byrne, E.H.; Doherty, K.E.; Bowman, B.A.; Yamamoto, S.; Soumillon, M.; Padavattan, N.; Ismail, N.; Moodley, A.; Sabatini, M.E.; et al. Inflammatory Responses in the Female Genital Tract. Immunity 2016, 42, 965–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Blackwell, A.L. Vaginal bacterial phaginosis ? Sex Trans Infect 1999, 75, 352–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Pavlova, S.I.; Kilic, A.O.; Mou, S.M.; Tao, L. Phage Infection in Vaginal Lactobacilli: An In Vitro Study. Infect. Dis. Obstet. Gynecol. 1997, 5, 36–44. [Google Scholar]
  79. Vander Borght, M.; Wyns, C. Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clin. Biochem. 2018, 62, 2–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Africa, C.W.J.; Nel, J.; Stemmet, M. Anaerobes and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy: Virulence Factors Contributing to Vaginal Colonisation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Heal. 2014, 11, 6979–7000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. van Oostrum, N.; De Sutter, P.; Meys, J.; Verstraelen, H. Risks associated with bacterial vaginosis in infertility patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 1809–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Salah, R.M.; Allam, A.M.; Magdy, A.M.; Mohamed, A.S. Bacterial vaginosis and infertility: Cause or association? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2013, 167, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ruggeri, M.; Cannas, S.; Cubeddu, M.; Molicotti, P.; Piras, G.L.; Dessole, S.; Zanetti, S. Bacterial agents as a cause of infertility in humans. New Microbiol. 2016, 39, 206–209. [Google Scholar]
  84. Cattani, P.; Cerimele, F.; Porta, D.; Graffeo, R.; Ranno, S.; Marchetti, S.; Ricci, R.; Capodicasa, N.; Fuga, L.; Amico, R.; et al. Age-specific seroprevalence of Human Herpesvirus 8 in Mediterranean regions. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Marci, R.; Gentili, V.; Bortolotti, D.; Lo Monte, G.; Caselli, E.; Bolzani, S.; Rotola, A.; Di Luca, D.; Rizzo, R. Presence of HHV-6A in Endometrial Epithelial Cells from Women with Primary Unexplained Infertility. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Caselli, E.; Bortolotti, D.; Marci, R.; Rotola, A.; Gentili, V.; Soffritti, I.; D’Accolti, M.; Lo Monte, G.; Sicolo, M.; Barao, I.; et al. HHV-6A Infection of Endometrial Epithelial Cells Induces Increased Endometrial NK Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Doody, K.J.; Doody, K.M.; Pratt, P.F., Jr.; Knox, K. Prospective evaluation of human herpesvirus 6 (HHV-6) in endometrial tissues of women with repeat implantation failure. Fertil. Steril. 2019, 112, e334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Teixeira, F.M.E.; Pietrobon, A.J.; de Oliveira, L.M.; da Oliveira, L.M.S.; Sato, M.N. Maternal-Fetal Interplay in Zika Virus Infection and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Dagnew, M.; Belachew, A.; Tiruneh, M.; Moges, F. Hepatitis E virus infection among pregnant women in Africa: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Endalamaw, A.; Demsie, A.; Eshetie, S.; Habtewold, T.D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of vertical transmission route of HIV in Ethiopia. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bhatta, A.K.; Keyal, U.; Liu, Y.; Gellen, E. Vertical transmission of herpes simplex virus: An update. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 2018, 16, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kagan, K.O.; Hamprecht, K. Cytomegalovirus infection in pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2017, 296, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Bascietto, F.; Liberati, M.; Murgano, D.; Buca, D.; Iacovelli, A.; Flacco, M.E.; Manzoli, L.; Familiari, A.; Scambia, G.; D’Antonio, F. Outcome of fetuses with congenital parvovirus B19 infection: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 52, 569–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Mandelbrot, L. Fetal varicella—Diagnosis, management, and outcome. Prenat. Diagn. 2012, 32, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Fettweis, J.M.; Serrano, M.G.; Brooks, J.P.; Edwards, D.J.; Girerd, P.H.; Parikh, H.I.; Huang, B.; Arodz, T.J.; Edupuganti, L.; Glascock, A.L.; et al. The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1012–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  96. Hočevar, K.; Maver, A.; Vidmar Šimic, M.; Hodžić, A.; Haslberger, A.; Premru Seršen, T.; Peterlin, B. Vaginal Microbiome Signature Is Associated With Spontaneous Preterm Delivery. Front. Med. 2019, 6, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Brown, R.G.; Al-Memar, M.; Marchesi, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Smith, A.; Chan, D.; Lewis, H.; Kindinger, L.; Terzidou, V.; Bourne, T.; et al. Establishment of vaginal microbiota composition in early pregnancy and its association with subsequent preterm prelabor rupture of the fetal membranes. Transl. Res. 2019, 207, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Amabebe, E.; Chapman, D.R.; Stern, V.L.; Stafford, G.; Anumba, D.O.C. Mid-gestational changes in cervicovaginal fluid cytokine levels in asymptomatic pregnant women are predictive markers of inflammation-associated spontaneous preterm birth. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 126, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ford, J.H.; Li, M.; Scheil, W.; Roder, D. Human papillomavirus infection and intrauterine growth restriction: A data-linkage study. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ford, J.H. Preconception risk factors and SGA babies: Papilloma virus, omega 3 and fat soluble vitamin deficiencies. Early Hum. Dev. 2011, 87, 785–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Van den Veyver, I.B.; Ni, J.; Bowles, N.; Carpenter, R.J.; Weiner, C.P.; Yankowitz, J.; Moise, K.J.; Henderson, J.; Towbin, J.A. Detection of Intrauterine Viral Infection Using the Polymerase Chain Reaction. Mol. Genet. Metab. 1998, 63, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. DiGiulio, D.B.; Romero, R.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Gomez, R.; Kim, C.J.; Seok, K.S.; Gotsch, F.; Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Vaisbuch, E.; Sanders, K.; et al. Prevalence and diversity of microbes in the amniotic fluid, the fetal inflammatory response, and pregnancy outcome in women with preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 64, 38–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  103. DiGiulio, D.B.; Gervasi, M.T.; Romero, R.; Vaisbuch, E.; Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Seok, K.S.; Gomez, R.; Mittal, P.; Gotsch, F.; et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age fetuses. J. Perinat. Med. 2010, 38, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. DiGiulio, D.B.; Gervasi, M.; Romero, R.; Mazaki-Tovi, S.; Vaisbuch, E.; Kusanovic, J.P.; Seok, K.S.; Gomez, R.; Mittal, P.; Gotsch, F.; et al. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity in preeclampsia as assessed by cultivation and sequence-based methods. J. Perinat. Med. 2010, 38, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Collado, M.C.; Rautava, S.; Aakko, J.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S. Human gut colonisation may be initiated in utero by distinct microbial communities in the placenta and amniotic fluid. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Lim, E.S.; Rodriguez, C.; Holtz, L.R. Amniotic fluid from healthy term pregnancies does not harbor a detectable microbial community. Microbiome 2018, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Payne, M.S.; Keelan, J.A.; Stinson, L.F. Re: “Amniotic fluid from healthy term pregnancies does not harbor a detectable microbial community”. Microbiome 2019, 7, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Lim, E.S.; Rodriguez, C.; Holtz, L.R. Reply Re: “Amniotic fluid from healthy term pregnancies does not harbor a detectable microbial community”. Microbiome 2019, 7, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Koi, H.; Zhang, J.; Makrigiannakis, A.; Getsios, S.; MacCalman, C.D.; Kopf, G.S.; Strauss III, J.F.; Parry, S. Differential Expression of the Coxsackievirus and Adenovirus Receptor Regulates Adenovirus Infection of the Placenta1. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 64, 1001–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Cardenas, I.; Means, R.E.; Aldo, P.; Koga, K.; Lang, S.M.; Booth, C.; Manzur, A.; Oyarzun, E.; Romero, R.; Mor, G. Viral Infection of the Placenta Leads to Fetal Inflammation and Sensitization to Bacterial Products Predisposing to Preterm Labor. J. Immunol. 2010, 185, 1248–1257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Racicot, K.; Cardenas, I.; Wünsche, V.; Aldo, P.; Guller, S.; Means, R.E.; Romero, R.; Mor, G. Viral Infection of the Pregnant Cervix Predisposes to Ascending Bacterial Infection. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 934–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Racicot, K.; Kwon, J.Y.; Aldo, P.; Abrahams, V.; El-Guindy, A.; Romero, R.; Mor, G. Type I Interferon Regulates the Placental Inflammatory Response to Bacteria and is Targeted by Virus: Mechanism of Polymicrobial Infection-Induced Preterm Birth. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 75, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Di Mascio, D.; Khalil, A.; Saccone, G.; Rizzo, G.; Buca, D.; Liberati, M.; Vecchiet, J.; Nappi, L.; Scambia, G.; Berghella, V.; et al. Outcome of Coronavirus spectrum infections (SARS, MERS, COVID 1-19) during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Qiu, L.; Liu, X.; Xiao, M.; Xie, J.; Cao, W.; Liu, Z.; Morse, A.; Xie, Y.; Li, T.; Zhu, L. SARS-CoV-2 is not detectable in the vaginal fluid of women with severe COVID-19 infection [published online ahead of print]. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, ciaa375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Luo, F.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.; Xu, D.; Gong, Q.; et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet 2020, 395, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Vivanti, A.J.; Vauloup-Fellous, C.; Prevot, S.; Zupan, V.; Suffee, C.; Do Cao, J.; Benachi, A.; De Luca, D. Transplacental transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Groß, R.; Conzelmann, C.; Müller, J.A.; Stenger, S.; Steinhart, K.; Kirchhoff, F.; Münch, J. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in human breastmilk. Lancet (London, England) 2020, 395, 1757–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Algarroba, G.N.; Rekawek, P.; Vahanian, S.A.; Khullar, P.; Palaia, T.; Peltier, M.R.; Chavez, M.R.; Vintzileos, A.M. Visualization of SARS-CoV-2 virus invading the human placenta using electron microscopy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Chinchar, V.G.; Hick, P.; Ince, I.A.; Jancovich, J.K.; Marschang, R.; Qin, Q.; Subramaniam, K.; Waltzek, T.B.; Whittington, R.; Williams, T.; et al. ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Iridoviridae. J. Gen. Virol. 2017, 98, 890–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Wilson, W.; Etten, J.; Schroeder, D.S.; Nagasaki, K.; Brussaard, C.; Delaroque, N.; Bratbak, G.; Suttle, C. ICTV 9th Report 2011 Phycodnaviridae. 2016. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303988473_ICTV_9th_Report_2011_Phycodnaviridae (accessed on 27 July 2020).
  121. de la Higuera, I.; Kasun, G.W.; Torrance, E.L.; Pratt, A.A.; Maluenda, A.; Colombet, J.; Bisseux, M.; Ravet, V.; Dayaram, A.; Stainton, D.; et al. Unveiling Crucivirus Diversity by Mining Metagenomic Data. bioRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Viruses 12 00832 g001 550
Figure 1. Current knowledge on eukaryote- and prokaryote-infecting vaginal viruses: The families, subfamilies and genera of eukaryote-infecting viruses, including double-stranded (ds) DNA, single-stranded (ss) DNA, dsRNA and ssRNA reverse transcribing (ssRNA-RT) viruses, as well as prokaryote-infecting dsDNA and ssDNA viruses that have been described in literature are listed.
Figure 1. Current knowledge on eukaryote- and prokaryote-infecting vaginal viruses: The families, subfamilies and genera of eukaryote-infecting viruses, including double-stranded (ds) DNA, single-stranded (ss) DNA, dsRNA and ssRNA reverse transcribing (ssRNA-RT) viruses, as well as prokaryote-infecting dsDNA and ssDNA viruses that have been described in literature are listed.
Viruses 12 00832 g001
Table
Table 1. Described viruses found in the female genital tract.
Table 1. Described viruses found in the female genital tract.
Eukaryote-Infecting DNA Viruses
dsDNA
ReferencesFamilySubfamilyGenusSpeciesType
[9,12,13,14,15,16]HerpesviridaeAlphaherpesvirinaeSimplexvirusHSV-2
VaricellovirusVaricella-zoster virus (HHV-3)
BetaherpesvirinaeCytomegalovirus
RoseolovirusHHV-6, HHV-7
Proboscivirus
GammaherpesvirinaeLymphocryptovirusEpstein–Barr virus (HHV-4)
Rhadinovirus
[14]Alloherpesviridae Cyprinivirus
[9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17]Papillomaviridae * FirstpapillomavirinaeAlphapapillomavirusAlphapapillomavirus 1e.g., HPV32, 42
Alphapapillomavirus 2e.g., HPV77
Alphapapillomavirus 3e.g., HPV61, 62, 72, 81, 83, 84, 86, 87, 89, 102, 114
Alphapapillomavirus 5e.g., HPV51, 26, 82, 69
Alphapapillomavirus 6e.g., HPV56, 66, 53, 30
Alphapapillomavirus 7e.g., HPV18, 39, 45, 59, 68, 70, 97
Alphapapillomavirus 8e.g., HPV7, 40, 43, 91,
Alphapapillomavirus 9e.g., HPV16, 31, 33, 35, 52, 58, 67,
Alphapapillomavirus 10e.g., HPV6, 11, 13, 44, 74
Alphapapillomavirus 11e.g., HPV73, 34
Alphapapillomavirus 13e.g., HPV54
Alphapapillomavirus 14e.g., HPV7, 90, 106
Betapapillomavirus
Gammapapillomavirus
Deltapapillomavirus
Dyoetapapillomavirus
Dyothetapapillomavirus
Phipapillomavirus
Unclassified Papillomaviridea e.g., HPV-85
[9,12,15,17]Polyomaviridae AlphapolyomavirusHuman polyomavirus-5 (MCPyV)
BetapolyomavirusHuman polyomavirus-1 (BKPyV), -2 (JCPyV),
[9,12]Adenoviridae MastadenovirusHuman adenovirus B and D
[12,14]Poxviridae MolluscipoxvirusMolluscum contagiosum virus-1 and -2
[14]Phycodnaviridae Chlorovirus
[14]Mimiviridae Unclassified Mimivirus
[14]Iridoviridae BetairidoviridaeIridovirus
[14]Marseilleviridae Marseillevirus
ssDNA
[9,12,15,16,17]Anelloviridae Alphatorquevirus
Unclassified AnellovirusTorque teno virus, SEN virus
[16]Genomoviridae Gemykibivirus
Eukaryote-Infecting RNA Viruses
dsRNA
[13]Partitiviridae
ssRNA-RT
[18,19,20]RetroviridaeOrthoretrovirinaeLentivirusHIV-1
Prokaryote-Infecting DNA Viruses
dsDNA
[14]Podoviridae
[14]Siphoviridae
[14]MyoviridaeTevenvirinaeTequatrovirusT4 virus
ssDNA
[14]Microviridae
* Including only subfamilies, genera, species and types that have been described to infect the genital mucosa. Risk of HPV types is indicated using different font types: high-risk, possibly high-risk and low risk.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Happel, A.-U.; Varsani, A.; Balle, C.; Passmore, J.-A.; Jaspan, H. The Vaginal Virome—Balancing Female Genital Tract Bacteriome, Mucosal Immunity, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes? Viruses 2020, 12, 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080832

AMA Style

Happel A-U, Varsani A, Balle C, Passmore J-A, Jaspan H. The Vaginal Virome—Balancing Female Genital Tract Bacteriome, Mucosal Immunity, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes? Viruses. 2020; 12(8):832. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080832

Chicago/Turabian Style

Happel, Anna-Ursula, Arvind Varsani, Christina Balle, Jo-Ann Passmore, and Heather Jaspan. 2020. "The Vaginal Virome—Balancing Female Genital Tract Bacteriome, Mucosal Immunity, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes?" Viruses 12, no. 8: 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080832

APA Style

Happel, A. -U., Varsani, A., Balle, C., Passmore, J. -A., & Jaspan, H. (2020). The Vaginal Virome—Balancing Female Genital Tract Bacteriome, Mucosal Immunity, and Sexual and Reproductive Health Outcomes? Viruses, 12(8), 832. https://doi.org/10.3390/v12080832

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop