Next Article in Journal
A Review of the Emerging White Chick Hatchery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Demonstration of Co-Infection and Trans-Encapsidation of Viral RNA In Vitro Using Epitope-Tagged Foot-and-Mouth Disease Viruses
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 Cells to Eliminate Mutations in the Furin Cleavage Site of Spike

1
Wisconsin National Primate Center, UW-Madison, Madison, WI 53711, USA
2
BIOQUAL, Inc., Rockville, MD 20852, USA
3
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, VA 20110, USA
4
The Biodefense and Emerging Infections Research Resources Repository (BEI Resources), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, VA 20110, USA
5
Office of Biodefense, Research Resources and Translational Research, Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
6
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, UW-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the manuscript.
Viruses 2021, 13(12), 2434; https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122434
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 2 December 2021 / Accepted: 2 December 2021 / Published: 4 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Infectious Diseases)

Abstract

:
SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis, vaccine, and therapeutic studies rely on the use of animals challenged with highly pathogenic virus stocks produced in cell cultures. Ideally, these virus stocks should be genetically and functionally similar to the original clinical isolate, retaining wild-type properties to be reliably used in animal model studies. It is well-established that SARS-CoV-2 isolates serially passaged on Vero cell lines accumulate mutations and deletions in the furin cleavage site; however, these can be eliminated when passaged on Calu-3 lung epithelial cell lines, as presented in this study. As numerous stocks of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern are being grown in cell cultures with the intent for use in animal models, it is essential that propagation methods generate virus stocks that are pathogenic in vivo. Here, we found that the propagation of a B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 stock on Calu-3 cells eliminated viruses that previously accumulated mutations in the furin cleavage site. Notably, there were alternative variants that accumulated at the same nucleotide positions in virus populations grown on Calu-3 cells at multiple independent facilities. When a Calu-3-derived B.1.351 virus stock was used to infect hamsters, the virus remained pathogenic and the Calu-3-specific variants persisted in the population. These results suggest that Calu-3-derived virus stocks are pathogenic but care should still be taken to evaluate virus stocks for newly arising mutations during propagation.

1. Introduction

The rapid development of vaccines and therapeutic measures to contend with the global SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is unprecedented. SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve and adapt to the human population, such that there will be a need to assess the continued effectiveness of current medical countermeasures or improve them in the short and long term. This has been highlighted by the efforts to evaluate whether the first-generation SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective against the highly transmissible Delta variant [1,2].
Advancing new interventions relies on performing preclinical efficacy studies in both small and large animals [3,4]. Each animal study requires the use of a well-characterized challenge stock produced in cell culture, ideally with minimal passaging to minimize the rise of genetic sub-populations that may affect the phenotype of the virus stock. SARS-CoV-2 challenge stocks are propagated from an original virus isolate prepared from a clinical sample in a cell culture as a Passage 1 stock. This serves as a seed stock that is propagated to make larger challenge stocks. Many quality control analyses of these stocks are limited to sequencing either a portion of the genome or simply generating a consensus sequence. This is insufficient. Each stock of virus should be deep sequenced across the whole genome to identify variant subpopulations that can accumulate as the virus is passaged. The full sequence of the original isolate, the number of passages of virus, and the cell lines used for virus propagation can all influence the pathogenicity of the challenge stock that is produced. Comparing the population sequence of each virus stock against the original isolate is one of the most straightforward quality control measures that can be taken. This information can affect the downstream use of the stocks, as evidenced in the current study.
All early SARS-CoV-2 strains were initially propagated on versions of African Green Monkey Vero cell lines. Vero cells grow quickly and express high levels of ACE2, the molecule recognized by the RBD (receptor-binding domain) of the spike protein that SARS-CoV-2 uses to enter lung epithelial cells [5,6,7]. Viral entry via the ACE2 receptor is improved by the furin-mediated pre-activation of the spike protein [8]. However, SARS-CoV-2 can also enter Vero cells by endocytosis, rendering the need to use the ACE2 receptor irrelevant [9,10]. Several groups have found that the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 on Vero-derived cells lines leads to the rapid accumulation and loss of a functional furin cleavage site within a few passages [11,12,13,14]. As a result, the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 on Vero cells gave rise to challenge stocks with defects in the furin cleavage site, making them non-pathogenic in animals [15].
To reduce the likelihood that SARS-CoV-2 challenge stocks acquire mutations in the furin cleavage site, some groups have grown SARS-CoV-2 on modified Vero cell lines. Vero/hSLAM cells were originally used to successfully grow a strain from Victoria, Australia that did not accumulate defective mutations in the furin cleavage site [16]. Even though Vero/hSLAM cells can support replication, a better Vero derivative was later found to be Vero/TMPRSS2 cells [17]. The TMPRSS2 serine protease primes the spike protein prior to the recognition of the ACE2 receptor and cell entry [8,9,18]. SARS-CoV-2 virus isolates passaged in cells expressing TMPRSS2 use this pathway for entry and retain the furin cleavage site [19]. In Ad-ACE2-transduced mice lacking TMPRSS2, SARS-CoV-2 growth is inhibited [20], implying that the TMPRSS2-mediated pathway is a key component of pathogenic infection in vivo.
Calu-3 cells are a human lung epithelial cell line that can support the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 and be a superior option for virus propagation. These cells can promote replication of SARS-CoV-2 viruses or pseudoviruses expressing the spike gene with an intact furin cleavage site, but viruses lacking this cleavage site do not efficiently replicate in Calu-3 cells [10,21,22]. While Calu-3 cells grow more slowly than Vero-derived cell lines, this deficiency is offset by the value of maintaining the furin cleavage site in the virus stocks.
In the present study, we evaluated how the propagation of a B.1.351-related (beta variant) SARS-CoV-2 isolate in two cell types, Vero/hSLAM and Calu-3 cells, affected viral genome sequences both within and outside of the furin cleavage site of the spike gene. We found an expansion of mutations in the furin cleavage site when the virus was grown on Vero/hSLAM cells, but these were eliminated when propagating it in Calu-3 cells. We also found distinct variants that accumulated when this virus stock was grown on Calu-3 cells. Importantly, the Calu-3-derived virus stocks remained pathogenic in hamsters, and the Calu-3-specific variants were maintained. Together, these results support the growth of SARS-CoV-2 challenge stocks on Calu-3 cells prior to use in animals to retain an intact furin cleavage site and viral pathogenicity.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reference Sequence for hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 Used in This Study

The complete genome of the clinical isolate of SARS-CoV-2, hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 has been sequenced (GISAID: EPI_ISL_678615). The following mutations are reported to be present in the clinical isolate: Spike A243del, Spike A701V, Spike D80A, Spike D215G, Spike D614G, Spike E484K, Spike K417N, Spike L18F, Spike L242del, Spike L244del, Spike N501Y, E (envelope protein) P71L, N (nucleocapsid protein) T205I, NSP3 (non-structural protein 3) Q57H, NSP3 S171L, NSP3 W131L, NSP7a (non-structural protein 7a) V93F, NSP2 (non-structural protein 2) T85I, NSP3 K837N, NSP5 (non-structural protein 5) K90R, NSP6 (non-structural protein 6) F108del, NSP6 G107del, NSP6 S106del, and NSP12 (non-structural protein 12) P323L. The deposited virus (at passage three) was reported to have additional mutations compared to the clinical isolate: N R32H, ORF1a (open reading frame 1a) N4358K, and ORF9b (open reading frame 9b) A29T.

2.2. Propagation of hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 by BEI Resources

Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), isolate hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 (also referred to as 501Y.V2.HV and 501Y.V2.HV001) was isolated from an oropharyngeal swab from a 40-year-old human male in Ugu district, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa on 16 November 2020. Under the nomenclature system introduced by GISAID (Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data), SARS-CoV-2, isolate hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 was assigned lineage B.1.351 and GISAID clade GH using Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak LINeages (PANGOLIN) tool. The viral strain was isolated and passaged three times at the Africa Health Research Institute, Durban 4001, South Africa [23]. H1299-ACE2-E3 cells were used for initial isolation followed by two passages into Vero E6 cells (ATCC® CRL-1586™) prior to its deposition with BEI Resources (Manassas, VA, USA), a US-funded biorepository for production and distribution to the scientific community.
Using the virus deposited with BEI Resources (hereinafter referred to as “hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 p4”), we inoculated both Calu-3 (ATCC® HTB-55™) and Vero-hSLAM cells, which are Cercopithecus aethiops kidney epithelial cells with human signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM), also known as CDw150. Vero/hSLAM cells were generously donated to BEI Resources by the CDC and are available in the European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures (ECACC Cat #04091501).
The viral growth in Calu-3 cells had a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.00001 based on the titer of the Passage 3 virus received from the depositing laboratory that had isolated and made virus stocks. Once the virus inoculum was adsorbed for one hour at 37 °C, viral growth media consisting of Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (ATCC® 30-2003™) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (ATCC® 30-2020™) were added. After 5 days of incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2, when roughly 60% of the cell monolayer showed cytopathic effects, the cell lysate and supernatant were harvested. Cell lysate and supernatant was clarified by centrifuging at 1500× g for 10 min at room temperature.
The viral growth in Vero-hSLAM cells had a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.00001, adsorbed for one hour at 37 °C before adding viral growth media consisting of Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (ATCC® 30-2003™) supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum (ATCC® 30-2020™). After 4 days of incubation at 37 °C with 5% CO2, when roughly 75% of the cell monolayer showed cytopathic effects, the cell lysate and supernatant were harvested and spin-clarified by centrifugation at 1500× g for 10 min at room temperature, and the resulting virus stock rapidly frozen using liquid nitrogen in small aliquots.
These viral strains (representing Passage 4) are available from BEI Resources under the catalog numbers NR-54009 (Vero-hSLAM) and NR-54974 (Calu-3). Genomic RNA (gRNA) was extracted for sequencing from a preparation of cell lysate and supernatant from each propagation using QIAamp® Viral RNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN 52906).

2.3. Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 Stocks Propagated by BEI Resources

The ATCC Sequencing and Bioinformatics Center (SBC) performed the library prep, sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis. SARS-CoV-2 samples were prepared for sequencing using the NEBNext® Ultra II™ RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina® (NEB #E7775) according to the manufacturer’s protocols. The samples were sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq platform using either a MiSeq® Reagent Micro Kit v2 (300 Cycle) or a MiSeq® Reagent Kit v2 (500 cycle) run for 300 cycles. Produced reads were trimmed using a custom pipeline, comprising Trimmomatic v0.38 using default parameters and FastQC v0.11.9, to remove low-quality bases and adapter sequences. Reference-based assembly was performed using the following genomes as reference sequences: MN908947.3 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 isolate Wuhan-Hu-1, complete genome) from GenBank and the clinical reference sequence for the interrogated strain.
Reads were then mapped to each reference sequence using bwa mem v0.7.17-r1188, one of the short-read aligner algorithms in the Burrow–Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software package designed for mapping reads or sequences against a large reference genome. Bwa mem was run with paired-end reads and with default parameters. Though the default alignment parameters are very relaxed and nonspecific, BEI Resources believes this to be both acceptable and appropriate for aligning reads from an isolate source prior to assembly. Reference regions with <10× mean coverage were considered poorly supported low coverage regions and excluded from further analysis. Reference coverage statistics were reported for each set of mapped reads using Qualimap v.2.2.1, a Java and R application, which provided sequence alignment quality metrics.
LoFreq Viterbi was then used to perform a series of global alignment-level realignments that considered the context of each read alignment to improve mismatch or indel positional agreement. Once completed, further analysis was performed by identifying variants relative to the respective reference sequence. In order to maintain consistent reporting of nucleotide location for the purposes of comparison and analysis, all variants were globally reported in the standard format, i.e., relative to the sequence location within the SARS-CoV-2 Wuhan-Hu-1 reference genome (MN908947.3). For a nucleotide at position X, the variant frequency was calculated as: Variant Frequency = (# Reads with Variant Nucleotide Mapped to Position X)/(Total # Reads Mapped to Position X).
SNPs and indels were detected using LoFreq version 2.1.8, an ultra-sensitive variant caller that makes use of base, indel, mapping, and alignment qualities to aid in the detection of low-frequency variants. The SBC variant calling pipeline incorporated LoFreq according to its suggested best practices. The pipeline first calls bcftools mpileup to generate an initial variant call set. Bcftools mpileup is one of the commands in the bcftools utilities set (version 1.10.2) that is designed to identify all nucleotides from a BAM file by position along a reference sequence. The command is used to only output sites with variant alleles present, which are then supplied to the Genome Analysis Toolkit Base Quality Score Recalibration (GATK BQSR) tool, the next step of the pipeline. Briefly, the GATK BQSR tool applies machine learning techniques to correct and adjust quality scores that can often be inaccurate due to sequencing errors. Once quality scores are adjusted, LoFreq calls variants using the realigned reads and can then identify lower-frequency variants, though it must be noted that variants below 5% frequency are still considered spurious.
In certain cases, some samples contained indels that LoFreq could not identify. FreeBayes v1.3.1-dirty was used to validate LoFreq variant calls and capture these indels. FreeBayes is a Bayesian genetic variant detector designed to find small polymorphisms, specifically SNPs (single-nucleotide polymorphisms), indels (insertions and deletions), MNPs (multi-nucleotide polymorphisms), and complex events (composite insertion and substitution events) smaller than the length of a short-read sequencing alignment. Since LoFreq is particularly sensitive to low-frequency variations and FreeBayes is adept at capturing indels, the final variants list is a merger of the results from both variant callers. We ran BEI Resources and collaborator read sets through this pipeline and found substantial agreement between BEI Resources detected variants and collaborator variant calls.

2.4. Propagation of hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 by BIOQUAL

Virus stocks were generated by infecting Calu-3 cells (ATCC HTB-55) in an EMEM medium containing 2% FBS, L-glutamine, and penicillin/streptomycin. Specifically, 10 mL of diluted seed stock were added to each T150 flask with ~80% confluent cell monolayer and allowed to absorb for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. An additional 42 mL of EMEM with 2% FBS were added to each flask, and the cell cultures were allowed to incubate for 3–4 days depending upon the amount of the nucleocapsid (NP) protein present in the supernatant, as measured by the antigen capture kit (My BioSource). The culture medium was collected into 50 mL conical tubes and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatants were combined into a large flask and mixed well, and 0.5–1 mL aliquots were prepared in 2 mL cryovials. The resulting virus stock was tested for sterility and stored at −80 °C.

2.5. Infection of Syrian Hamsters with BQ-RSA-p4

Four Golden Syrian hamsters (2 male and 2 female) were intranasally infected with 0.1 mL of a 1:10 dilution of the BQ-RSA-p4 stock. The titer of the neat stock was 5 × 108 TCID50/mL in Vero-TMPRSS2 cells, which was 1.09 × 107 PFU/mL in Vero-TMPRSS2 cells, which means that 5 × 106 TCID50 of virus was used to infect each animal. Animals were observed and weighed daily. Oral swabs were collected on days 2, 4, and 7 to measure viral loads using quantitative PCR for genomic and subgenomic RNA, as described previously [24]. At 7 days post infection, animals were euthanized and maximally bled. Lungs were collected at necropsy. Viral RNA was isolated from lung for sequencing and viral load testing.

2.6. Sequencing and Bioinformatic Analysis of hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 Stocks Propagated by BIOQUAL

SARS-CoV-2 inocula were sequenced using a modified approach originally developed by ARTIC Network (https://artic.network, accessed on 12 February 2021) [14]. Briefly, complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized with SuperScript IV Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), random hexamers, and dNTPs. Complementary DNA was PCR-amplified with a multiplex PCR amplicon-based approach that was developed for Nanopore. The multiplex PCR used a total of 96 primers in two pools with Q5 Hot Start Hi-Fi 2x Master mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and the following thermocycling conditions: 98 °C for 30 s, followed by 25 cycles of 98 °C for 15 s and 65 °C for five minutes, then an indefinite hold at 4 °C. Amplified PCR products were pooled and purified with AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Libraries were prepared with the TruSeq sample preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples were end-repaired, purified using the Sample Purification Beads (SPB), and A-Tailed followed by adaptor ligation. A post-ligation bead cleanup was performed with SPBs. Finally, each sample was amplified via eight cycles of PCR, cleaned with SPBs, and eluted in RSB. The concentration and average fragment length were determined with a Qubit dsDNA high-sensitivity kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) and Agilent’s High Sensitivity DNA kit, respectively. Each sample was equimolarly pooled to a concentration of 4 nM. This pool was denatured with five μL of 0.2 N NaOH, vortexed, and incubated at room temperature for five minutes. An HT1 buffer solution was added to generate a 20 pM pool. The 20 pM pool was then diluted to a final concentration of 10 pM, and a Phix-derived control was spiked in to account for 10% of the total DNA. The pool was loaded onto a 2 × 250 cycle V2 cartridge to be sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq.
An analytical pipeline called “Zequencer_ncov19” was developed to process the raw FASTQ files. In short, the primer sequences were trimmed and the reads were paired and merged using BBDuk (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbduk-guide/ (accessed on 29 October 2021)) and BBMerge (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbmerge-guide/, accessed on 29 October 2021), respectively. The reads were then mapped to the Wuhan-1 reference genome (MN908947.3) using BBMap (https://jgi.doe.gov/data-and-tools/bbtools/bb-tools-user-guide/bbmap-guide/ (accessed on 29 October 2021)). Variants and SNPs were detected with SnpEff and VarScan, and they were called at a threshold of 1%. The BAM alignments and vcf files were imported into Geneious Prime 2021.1.1, which was used to visualize and compare the alignments to the SARS-Related Coronavirus 2 isolate (hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020) reference genome, obtained from GISAID. A version of the Zequencer_ncov19 analysis pipeline is available at https://github.com/DABAKER165/zequencer_ncov19 (accessed on 29 October 2021). Sequences were uploaded to SRA, as indicated in Supplemental Table S1 and metrics are shown in Supplemental Table S2.

3. Results

3.1. hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 Passage Description

The workflow for passaging the hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 (EPI_ISL_678615) stocks is shown in Figure 1. As described in the Methods section, this virus stock was isolated from an individual in South Africa and then propagated once in H1299-ACE2-E3 cells and twice more in Vero E6 cells. This Passage 3 (p3) virus stock was independently received by both BEI Resources and BIOQUAL.

3.2. hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020, Propagation, and Sequencing at BEI Resources

At BEI Resources, the deposited p3 stock was propagated separately on Vero-SLAM (Catalog #: NR-54009) and Calu-3 (Catalog #: NR-54974) cells to generate two independent p4 stocks. A sample of virus from each p4 stock was deep sequenced, as described in the Methods section. Comparative analyses of the variants present in both p4 stocks were performed to two different reference sequences: (1) the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference sequence (Genbank: MN908947) and (2) the hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 reference reported in GISAID (EPI_ISL_678615).
The following fixed mutations (Table 1) were confirmed to be present, as reported in the clinical sample in both the Vero-hSLAM (NR-54009)- and Calu-3 (NR-54974)-derived p4 stocks propagated by BEI Resources: Spike A243del, Spike A701V, Spike D80A, Spike D215G, Spike D614G, Spike E484K, Spike K417N, Spike L18F, Spike L242del, Spike L244del, Spike N501Y, E (envelope protein) P71L, N (nucleocapsid protein) T205I, ORF3 (open reading frame 3) Q57H, NSP3 S171L, NSP3 W131L, ORF7a (open reading frame 7a) V93F, NSP2 (non-structural protein 2) T85I, NSP3 K837N, NSP5 (non-structural protein 5) K90R, NSP6 (non-structural protein 6) F108del, NSP6 G107del, NSP6 S106del, and NSP12 (non-structural protein 12) P323L. The deposited virus (at passage 3) was reported to have additional mutations compared to the clinical isolate: N R32H, ORF1a (open reading frame 1a) N4358K, and ORF9b (open reading frame 9b) A29T.
There were additional variants detected at a frequency of greater than 5% in the NR-54009, NR-54974, or both p4 stocks that were not described in the clinical reference consensus sequence (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). Importantly, there were two mutations at positions 23,596 and 23,606, which are located just upstream and within the furin cleavage site. Variants were present in the p4 stock grown on Vero-hSLAM cells (NR-54009) at approximately 90% (Table 2), but they were absent from the Calu-3-derived NR-54974 stock (Table 3). Table 4 shows variants present in both stocks, but the variant frequencies were not necessarily identical between stocks.

3.3. hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 Propagation and Sequencing at BIOQUAL

BIOQUAL received the same p3 stock obtained at BEI Resources and serially propagated it twice on Calu-3 cells to generate Passages 4 and 5 (BQ-RSA-p4 and BQ-RSA-p5), which were sequenced by Illumina (see the Methods section). We analyzed the sequences relative to the Wuhan-Hu-1 reference sequence, as described in the Methods section. We found the same 25 variants associated with this virus lineage in both the BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5 stocks that were present in the NR-54009 and NR-54974 stocks produced at BEI Resources (Table 1 and Table 5).
In BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5, we detected the same four variants that BEI Resources found at a frequency of 90% or greater in the NR-54974 stock that had been propagated on Calu-3 cells (Table 4 and Table 6, positions 11,020, 13,339, 28,368, 29,821), but were at a frequency of 26% or less in the NR-54009 stock prepared on Vero-SLAMs and were absent from the Wuhan-Hu-1 or the EPI_ISL_678615 reference sequences. This suggests that these four variants may have arisen when growing the hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020 stock on Calu-3 cells at two different locations (BEI Resources and BIOQUAL) and raises the possibility that these variants reflect the adaptation of the B.1.351 virus lineage to Calu-3 cells. Importantly, the two mutations in the furin cleavage site that were detected at 90% in NR-54009 grown on Vero-hSLAM cells (Table 2, positions 23,593 and 23,606) were only present at ~3% in BQ-RSA-p4 and undetectable in BQ-RSA-p5. This further supports evidence that SARS-CoV-2 viruses with variants in the furin cleavage site are unfit to grow on Calu-3 cells [22].
We also detected eight de novo variants that were in BQ-RSA-p5 at a frequency of greater than 5% but were absent in the Wuhan-Hu-1 or the EPI_ISL_678615 reference sequences (Table 7). When we examined the frequency of these same eight variants in BQ-RSA-p4, they were present at a lower frequency, except for site 26,250 (Table 7). These same eight variants were not detected in NR-54009 or NR-54974 prepared at BEI. Further studies will need to determine if these variants also represent adaptations to Calu-3 cells or if they arose by another mechanism.
BIOQUAL also received the NR-54974 stock from BEI Resources and propagated it once on Calu-3 cells to generate NR-54974-p5. This new stock was also sequenced and analyzed using the same methods as BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5. We found the same 25 fixed variants and 4 Calu-3-specific variants shown in Table 5 and Table 6, respectively. Of the eight de novo variants (Table 7), the synonymous variant at site 26,250 was present at 11% in BQ-RSA-p5 and at 45% in NR-54974-p5. The other seven de novo variants in BQ-RSA-p5 were not present in NR-54974-p5. Instead, NR-54974-p5 had six unique de novo variants present at a frequency of 5% or greater (Table 8). Homopolymeric regions were excluded.

3.4. BQ-RSA-p4 Retained Pathogenicity in Hamsters

Four hamsters (two males and two females) were intranasally infected with a 1:10 dilution of BQ-RSA-p4. Animals were monitored for 7 days and then euthanized. During the course of infection, we found oral viral titers were greater than 1 × 106 copies per swab. At necropsy, we detected approximately 2 × 109 copies of virus per gram of lung tissues, consistent with other studies of the SARS-CoV-2 infection of hamsters (Figure 2) [15,25,26,27]. Additionally, infected hamsters lost 15% of their body weight during the study, as expected for a pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 that has an intact furin cleavage site [14,15].
At necropsy, lungs were collected, and RNA was isolated for sequencing. Sequencing was performed by Illumina using the ARTIC protocol. Unfortunately, because these were samples isolated from tissues from later stages of infection, amplification was variable across the genome, and some amplicons dropped out completely. Sequence data can be found in the Bioproject PRJNA758017, and basic metrics are found in Supplementary Table S1.
We first examined the 25 fixed variants described in Table 5. At each of the 25 sites where we could confidently call variants (see the Methods section), the variants remained fixed in the viruses isolated from the animals (Supplemental Table S3).
We then examined the four nucleotide sites described in Table 6 that were specific to the virus stocks grown in Calu-3 cells. Coverage for the one site in the 3′UTR (position 29,821) was less than 70x for all datasets, but the variant was largely present. Of the other three sites, all were present at frequencies similar to the stock in viruses isolated from the hamster lungs (Supplemental Table S4).
Finally, the eight de novo variants described in Table 7 were examined. There were three sites with little to no coverage (2969, 21,633, and 23,044). Of the other five sites, four of them expanded in the animals, providing additional evidence that there BQ-RSA-p4 replicated in the hamsters. Only one site, 26,250, remained at a fairly stable frequency (Supplemental Table S5). Interestingly, this was the same site where the variant frequency did not increase when BQ-RSA-p4 was passaged once on Calu-3 cells to make BQ-RSA-p5, but it did increase when NR-54974 was passaged once on Calu-3 cells at BIOQUAL to produce NR-54974-p5. This suggests that the overall passage history can affect the final frequency of a variant in the virus population.

4. Discussion

The rapid acceleration of SARS-CoV-2 studies in animals to understand pathogenesis and develop therapeutics and vaccines has been essential to the pandemic response since early 2020. In the early days of the outbreak, the immediate need to study SARS-CoV-2 required that this virus be propagated as quickly as possible. As a result, Vero cells were the initial mainstay for propagating SARS-CoV-2 because these cells had been previously used for the propagation of closely related human coronaviruses [28]. At the time, the importance of an intact furin cleavage site for SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity was underappreciated, and the extensive array of mutations and deletions in the furin cleavage site during the propagation of SARS-CoV-2 on various Vero-derived cells was unpredictable, likely due to the heterogeneity of the cells themselves in stocks available in laboratories globally. It has now become clear that the maintenance of an intact furin cleavage site is needed for SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in animal models [15,29].
Appropriate virus propagation conditions are needed to maintain an intact furin cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 virus populations. In this study, we evaluated whether the propagation of a B.1.351 lineage of SARS-CoV-2 on Calu-3 cells would yield a virus stock devoid of furin cleavage site mutations and deletions, even when the stock was previously passaged twice on Vero cells. Specifically, we wanted to determine whether the propagation on Calu-3 cells would eliminate accumulated virus subpopulations that have mutant furin cleave site sequences and prevent the generation of viruses with new variants or deletions of this site as a result of cell culture adaptations.
Two separate laboratories (BEI Resources and BIOQUAL) obtained the same p3 isolate of a B.1.351 virus lineage that had been passaged twice through Vero E6 cells. When independently grown on Calu-3 cells at each site, previously accumulated mutations in the furin cleavage site were lost from the population. However, BEI Resources also grew this same stock on Vero-hSLAM cells, only to find that the mutations in the furin cleavage site persisted in the population. Our results are consistent with recent studies that grew an early SARS-CoV-2 isolate and engineered pseudovirus mutants on Calu-3 cells. In each of these studies, SARS-CoV-2 viruses with an intact furin cleavage site infected Calu-3 cells faster than those viruses lacking these features [21,22]. We built on this previous observation by finding that B.1.351 ‘Beta’ SARS-CoV-2 variants with furin cleavage site point mutations were also lost from the population when propagated on Calu-3 cells. This observation indicates that likely all SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern will accumulate furin cleavage site mutations when grown on Vero cells, but these can be eliminated if propagated on Calu-3 prior to use in animals.
One concern about growing SARS-CoV-2 on Calu-3 cells is that other variants may arise in the virus population that reflect Calu-3 cell culture adaptations. We found four new variants present in all hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020-derived stocks grown on Calu-3 cells, including those grown at BEI Resources and BIOQUAL (Table 6). We hypothesize that these four variants are Calu-3 cell culture adaptations; they included two synonymous variants in Nsp6 and the 3′UTR and two nonsynonymous variants in Nsp10 and nucleocapsid. We also detected unique variants in the viruses propagated on Calu-3 cells in RSA-BQ-p4 and p5, but these were not present in the stocks propagated on Calu-3 cells at BEI Resources (Table 7).
To evaluate whether the Calu-3-specific mutations would persist in vivo, we infected four hamsters with the Calu-3-derived BQ-RSA-p4 stock. This virus grew well in these animals, with subgenomic viral titers exceeding 107 copies/gram lung tissue—results similar to those found in hamsters infected with the WA/2020 (Wuhan) isolate [15,26,27]. These hamsters lost ~15% of their body weight, further suggesting that the Calu-3-associated mutations did not affect virus pathogenicity in hamsters. This stands in stark contrast to the limited weight loss observed in hamsters infected with stocks lacking a furin cleavage site [14,15]. The variants detected in the Calu-3-derived stocks were also either maintained or expanded in the hamsters. Future studies will need to evaluate whether other SARS-CoV-2 lineage variants (such as B.1.617.2) would acquire the same nucleotide variants when grown on Calu-3 cells or whether the nucleotide variants described here are restricted to the B.1.351 lineage.
Finally, our data further support the ongoing need to deep sequence virus challenge stocks prior to challenging animals. At one end of the spectrum, the loss of a functional furin cleavage site is an extreme but real consequence of growing SARS-CoV-2 stocks in Vero cells. Here, we found that growing SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 cells did not lead to the same furin cleavage site mutations, but there were other cell-specific adaptations. While these Calu-3-derived variants did not have apparent detrimental effects on pathogenesis in the hamsters studied here, that could not be predicted by simply looking at the sequence data.
Our study supports a workflow where the deep sequencing of a challenge inoculum to generate a comprehensive view of the complexity of the virus population is warranted. As SARS-CoV-2 challenge stocks are constantly propagated at different sites, variant frequencies will continue to change as stocks adapt to cell culture conditions. It is important to distinguish whether a pathogenic viral variant detected in an animal arose de novo or was originally present in the inoculum. As such, understanding virus diversity beyond the level of the consensus sequence is essential to identify underlying mutations that may alter virus pathogenicity. Thus, we propose that characterizing the complexity of the challenge stock should be required for every in vivo challenge study.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v13122434/s1, Supplemental Table S1: SRA accession numbers for sequences of BIOQUAL stocks and hamster isolates. Supplemental Table S2: Sequence metrics for viruses isolated from hamsters. Supplemental Table S3: Number of sites from Table S5 remaining fixed in the hamster lung samples. Supplemental Table S4: Frequencies of variant nucleotides in viruses isolated from hamster lungs that were fixed in Calu-3-derived stocks (Table 6). There were four fixed variants associated with growing the stock in Calu-3 cells, as shown in Table 6. Sequence data were obtained at three of these sites in the viruses isolated from the lungs of hamsters infected with the stock. Here, we list each nucleotide position, the frequency of the variant in the BQ-RSA-p4 stock, and the frequency of the variant in one or two replicates sequenced from each of the four indicated animals. Supplemental Table S5: Frequencies of five of the variants detected in hamsters that were de novo in the BQ-RSA-p4 stock (Table 7). There were eight de novo unfixed variants in BQ-RSA-p4 (Table 7). Sequence data were obtained at five of these sites in the viruses isolated from the lungs of hamsters infected with the stock. Here, we list each nucleotide position, the frequency of the variant in the BQ-RSA-p4 stock, and the frequency of the variant in one or two replicates sequenced from each of the four indicated animals.

Author Contributions

J.J.B., H.A., S.R., D.Y., N.P. and M.P. collected and analyzed data. J.J.B., H.A., S.R. and R.B. created figures and provided text. S.R., R.B., C.F., K.J.S., M.G.L. and S.L.O. contributed to the manuscript content. S.L.O. organized the manuscript and constructed the text. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Office of The Director, National Institutes of Health under Award Number P51OD011106 to the WNPRC, University of Wisconsin-Madison. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. This project was funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN272201600013C, managed by ATCC.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The hamster studies were conducted in compliance with all relevant local, state, and federal regulations and were approved by the BIOQUAL Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) (Approval #20-020P).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Table S1 contains accession numbers for sequence data generated with samples from BIOQUAL. BEI sequence data is available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The following reagents were obtained through BEI Resources, NIAID, NIH: SARS-Related Coronavirus 2, Isolate hCoV-19/South Africa/KRISP-K005325/2020, NR-54009, and NR-54974, as contributed by Alex Sigal and Tulio de Oliveira.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lopez Bernal, J.; Andrews, N.; Gower, C.; Gallagher, E.; Simmons, R.; Thelwall, S.; Stowe, J.; Tessier, E.; Groves, N.; Dabrera, G.; et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines against the B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pouwels, K.B.; Pritchard, E.; Matthews, P.C.; Stoesser, N.; Eyre, D.W.; Vihta, K.D.; House, T.; Hay, J.; Bell, J.I.; Newton, J.N.; et al. Effect of Delta variant on viral burden and vaccine effectiveness against new SARS-CoV-2 infections in the UK. Nat. Med. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mercado, N.B.; Zahn, R.; Wegmann, F.; Loos, C.; Chandrashekar, A.; Yu, J.; Liu, J.; Peter, L.; McMahan, K.; Tostanoski, L.H.; et al. Single-shot Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques. Nature 2020, 586, 583–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Corbett, K.S.; Flynn, B.; Foulds, K.E.; Francica, J.R.; Boyoglu-Barnum, S.; Werner, A.P.; Flach, B.; O’Connell, S.; Bock, K.W.; Minai, M.; et al. Evaluation of the mRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 1544–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Case, J.B.; Bailey, A.L.; Kim, A.S.; Chen, R.E.; Diamond, M.S. Growth, detection, quantification, and inactivation of SARS-CoV-2. Virology 2020, 548, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jureka, A.S.; Silvas, J.A.; Basler, C.F. Propagation, Inactivation, and Safety Testing of SARS-CoV-2. Viruses 2020, 12, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ren, X.; Glende, J.; Al-Falah, M.; de Vries, V.; Schwegmann-Wessels, C.; Qu, X.; Tan, L.; Tschernig, T.; Deng, H.; Naim, H.Y.; et al. Analysis of ACE2 in polarized epithelial cells: Surface expression and function as receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome-associated coronavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2006, 87, 1691–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shang, J.; Wan, Y.; Luo, C.; Ye, G.; Geng, Q.; Auerbach, A.; Li, F. Cell entry mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 11727–11734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.H.; Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pöhlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ogando, N.S.; Dalebout, T.J.; Zevenhoven-Dobbe, J.C.; Limpens, R.W.; van der Meer, Y.; Caly, L.; Druce, J.; de Vries, J.C.; Kikkert, M.; Bárcena, M.; et al. SARS-coronavirus-2 replication in Vero E6 cells: Replication kinetics, rapid adaptation and cytopathology. J. Gen. Virol. 2020, 101, 925–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lau, S.Y.; Wang, P.; Mok, B.W.; Zhang, A.J.; Chu, H.; Lee, A.C.; Deng, S.; Chen, P.; Chan, K.H.; Song, W.; et al. Attenuated SARS-CoV-2 variants with deletions at the S1/S2 junction. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 837–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Klimstra, W.B.; Tilston-Lunel, N.L.; Nambulli, S.; Boslett, J.; McMillen, C.M.; Gilliland, T.; Dunn, M.D.; Sun, C.; Wheeler, S.E.; Wells, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 growth, furin-cleavage-site adaptation and neutralization using serum from acutely infected hospitalized COVID-19 patients. J. Gen. Virol. 2020, 101, 1156–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Funnell, S.P.; Afrough, B.; Baczenas, J.J.; Berry, N.; Bewley, K.R.; Bradford, R.; Florence, C.; Duff, Y.L.; Lewis, M.; Moriarty, R.V.; et al. A cautionary perspective regarding the isolation and serial propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Vero cells. NPJ Vaccines 2021, 6, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Johnson, B.A.; Xie, X.; Bailey, A.L.; Kalveram, B.; Lokugamage, K.G.; Muruato, A.; Zou, J.; Zhang, X.; Juelich, T.; Smith, J.K.; et al. Loss of furin cleavage site attenuates SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis. Nature 2021, 591, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Caly, L.; Druce, J.; Roberts, J.; Bond, K.; Tran, T.; Kostecki, R.; Yoga, Y.; Naughton, W.; Taiaroa, G.; Seemann, T.; et al. Isolation and rapid sharing of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) from the first patient diagnosed with COVID-19 in Australia. Med. J. Aust. 2020, 212, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Wurtz, N.; Penant, G.; Jardot, P.; Duclos, N.; La Scola, B. Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 40, 477–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Matsuyama, S.; Nao, N.; Shirato, K.; Kawase, M.; Saito, S.; Takayama, I.; Nagata, N.; Sekizuka, T.; Katoh, H.; Kato, F.; et al. Enhanced isolation of SARS-CoV-2 by TMPRSS2-expressing cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 7001–7003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Sasaki, M.; Uemura, K.; Sato, A.; Toba, S.; Sanaki, T.; Maenaka, K.; Hall, W.W.; Orba, Y.; Sawa, H. SARS-CoV-2 variants with mutations at the S1/S2 cleavage site are generated in vitro during propagation in TMPRSS2-deficient cells. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, F.; Han, M.; Dai, P.; Xu, W.; He, J.; Tao, X.; Wu, Y.; Tong, X.; Xia, X.; Guo, W.; et al. Distinct mechanisms for TMPRSS2 expression explain organ-specific inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection by enzalutamide. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mykytyn, A.Z.; Breugem, T.I.; Riesebosch, S.; Schipper, D.; van den Doel, P.B.; Rottier, R.J.; Lamers, M.M.; Haagmans, B.L. SARS-CoV-2 entry into human airway organoids is serine protease-mediated and facilitated by the multibasic cleavage site. Elife 2021, 10, e64508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Lamers, M.M.; Mykytyn, A.Z.; Breugem, T.I.; Wang, Y.; Wu, D.C.; Riesebosch, S.; van den Doel, P.B.; Schipper, D.; Bestebroer, T.; Wu, N.C.; et al. Human airway cells prevent SARS-CoV-2 multibasic cleavage site cell culture adaptation. Elife 2021, 10, e66815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wibmer, C.K.; Ayres, F.; Hermanus, T.; Madzivhandila, M.; Kgagudi, P.; Oosthuysen, B.; Lambson, B.E.; de Oliveira, T.; Vermeulen, M.; van der Berg, K.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 501Y.V2 escapes neutralization by South African COVID-19 donor plasma. Nat. Med. 2021, 27, 622–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Alleva, D.G.; Delpero, A.R.; Scully, M.M.; Murikipudi, S.; Ragupathy, R.; Greaves, E.K.; Sathiyaseelan, T.; Haworth, J.R.; Shah, N.J.; Rao, V.; et al. Development of an IgG-Fc fusion COVID-19 subunit vaccine, AKS-452. Vaccine 2021, 39, 6601–6613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Abdelnabi, R.; Boudewijns, R.; Foo, C.S.; Seldeslachts, L.; Sanchez-Felipe, L.; Zhang, X.; Delang, L.; Maes, P.; Kaptein, S.F.; Weynand, B.; et al. Comparing infectivity and virulence of emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants in Syrian hamsters. EBioMedicine 2021, 68, 103403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tostanoski, L.H.; Wegmann, F.; Martinot, A.J.; Loos, C.; McMahan, K.; Mercado, N.B.; Yu, J.; Chan, C.N.; Bondoc, S.; Starke, C.E.; et al. Ad26 vaccine protects against SARS-CoV-2 severe clinical disease in hamsters. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1694–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Imai, M.; Iwatsuki-Horimoto, K.; Hatta, M.; Loeber, S.; Halfmann, P.J.; Nakajima, N.; Watanabe, T.; Ujie, M.; Takahashi, K.; Ito, M.; et al. Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 16587–16595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ksiazek, T.G.; Erdman, D.; Goldsmith, C.S.; Zaki, S.R.; Peret, T.; Emery, S.; Tong, S.; Urbani, C.; Comer, J.A.; Lim, W.; et al. A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003, 348, 1953–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peacock, T.P.; Goldhill, D.H.; Zhou, J.; Baillon, L.; Frise, R.; Swann, O.C.; Kugathasan, R.; Penn, R.; Brown, J.C.; Sanchez-David, R.Y.; et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat. Microbiol. 2021, 6, 899–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of the passage history for the virus stocks characterized in this study. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Schematic of the passage history for the virus stocks characterized in this study. Created with BioRender.com.
Viruses 13 02434 g001
Figure 2. Hamsters are susceptible to pathogenic infection with BQ-RSA-p4 grown on Calu-3 cells. (A) The mean and SEM of the body weight for all four hamsters infected with BQ-RSA-p4 over the 7 days post challenge are shown. The dotted line represents zero change in body weight. Total (B) and subgenomic (C) viral copies from oral swabs were measured during the course of infection for all four hamsters listed. On the day of necropsy, the total and subgenomic viral copies were measured in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (D) and lung tissue (E) for all four hamsters. Each dot represents a different animal, and the median is shown with the line. Methods from Alleva et al. [24] were used for virus quantification.
Figure 2. Hamsters are susceptible to pathogenic infection with BQ-RSA-p4 grown on Calu-3 cells. (A) The mean and SEM of the body weight for all four hamsters infected with BQ-RSA-p4 over the 7 days post challenge are shown. The dotted line represents zero change in body weight. Total (B) and subgenomic (C) viral copies from oral swabs were measured during the course of infection for all four hamsters listed. On the day of necropsy, the total and subgenomic viral copies were measured in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (D) and lung tissue (E) for all four hamsters. Each dot represents a different animal, and the median is shown with the line. Methods from Alleva et al. [24] were used for virus quantification.
Viruses 13 02434 g002
Table 1. Twenty-five fixed Variants in both NR-54009 and NR-54974 consistent with the clinical reference sequence (EPI_ISL_678615). (* indicates deletion).
Table 1. Twenty-five fixed Variants in both NR-54009 and NR-54974 consistent with the clinical reference sequence (EPI_ISL_678615). (* indicates deletion).
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54009 and NR-54974GeneAmino Acid Mutation
10591057CTTNsp2T85I
52305228GTTNsp3K837N
10,32310,321AGGNsp5K90R
14,40814,397CTTNsp12P323L
21,61421,603CTTSpikeL18F
21,80121,790ACCSpikeD80A
22,20622,195AGGSpikeD215G
22,81322,793GTTSpikeK417N
23,01222,992GAASpikeE484K
23,06323,043ATTSpikeN501Y
23,40323,383AGGSpikeD614G
23,66423,644CTTSpikeA701V
25,56325,543GTTORF3aQ57H
25,78425,764GTTORF3aW131L
25,90425,884CTTORF3aS171L
26,45626,436CTTEP71L
27,67027,650GTTORF7aV93F
28,88728,867CTTNT205I
11,287 *11,285 *GTCTGGTTTTGGNsp6ΔSGF (aa106–108)
22,286 *22,275 *CTTGCTTTACCCSpikeΔLAL (aa242–244)
174172GTT5′UTRNo AA Change
241239CTT5′UTRNo AA Change
26922690ATTNsp2No AA Change
30373035CTTNsp3No AA Change
28,25328,233CTTORF8No AA Change
Table 2. Variants present in NR-54009 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Table 2. Variants present in NR-54009 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54009Variant FrequencyGeneAmino Acid Mutation
10,80910,807CCT54%Nsp5P252L
11,75011,739CCT10%Nsp6L260F
17,33917,328CCT7%Nsp13A368V
21,65121,640AAC12%SpikeN30T
23,59323,573GGT90%SpikeQ677H
23,60623,586CCT90%SpikeR682W
25,81025,790CCT14%ORF3aL140F
26,82226,802CCT7%MNo AA Change
26,98426,964CCT6%MNo AA Change
27,39327,373CCT63%btw ORF6/7No AA Change
27,62727,607TTA28%ORF7aNo AA Change
Table 3. Variants present in NR-54974 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Table 3. Variants present in NR-54974 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54974Variant FrequencyGeneAmino Acid Mutation
37213719TTC9%Nsp3No AA Change
88218819AAG9%Nsp4No AA Change
10,08210,080TTC5%Nsp5S10L
10,45110,449AAG9%Nsp5N133D
15,90915,898TTC6%Nsp12No AA Change
Table 4. Variants present in both NR-54009 and NR-54974 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Table 4. Variants present in both NR-54009 and NR-54974 but not present in the clinical reference consensus sequence (EPI_ISL_678615).
Stock NumberPosition in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54009 or NR-54974Variant FrequencyGeneAmino Acid Mutation
NR-5497419631961TTC9%Nsp2No AA Change
NR-5497419631961TTG6%Nsp2No AA Change
NR-5400919631961TTA6%Nsp2No AA Change
NR-5497411,02011,018CCT95%Nsp6No AA Change
NR-5400911,02011,018CCT25%Nsp6No AA Change
NR-5497413,33913,328TTG94%Nsp10N105K
NR-5400913,33913,328TTG26%Nsp10N105K
NR-5497414,67914,668TTC22%Nsp12No AA Change
NR-5400914,67914,668TTC18%Nsp12No AA Change
NR-5497422,11422,103TTC12%SpikeNo AA Change
NR-5400922,11422,103TTC11%SpikeNo AA Change
NR-5497425,80625,786AAG6%ORF3aNo AA Change
NR-5400925,80625,786AAG5%ORF3aNo AA Change
NR-5497428,23728,217GGT6%ORF8R115L
NR-5400928,23728,217GGT90%ORF8R115L
NR-5497428,36828,348GGA90%NR32H
NR-5400928,36828,348GGA9%NR32H
NR-5497429,82129,801TTG92%3′UTRnoncoding
NR-5400929,82129,801TTG12%3′UTRnoncoding
Table 5. Twenty-five fixed variants present in BQ-RSA-p4 and BQ-RSA-p5 matching those in NR-54009 and NR-54974.
Table 5. Twenty-five fixed variants present in BQ-RSA-p4 and BQ-RSA-p5 matching those in NR-54009 and NR-54974.
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54009 and NR-54974Variant Frequency BQ-RSA-p4Variant Frequency BQ-RSA-P5GeneAmino Acid Mutation
174172GTT95%100%5′ UTRNo AA Change
241239CTT94%100%5′ UTRNo AA Change
10591057CTT94%100%Nsp2T85I
26922690ATT90%100%Nsp2No AA Change
30373035CTT94%100%Nsp3No AA Change
52305228GTT74%100%Nsp3K837N
10,32310,321AGG95%100%Nsp5K90R
11,287–11,29511,285GTCTGGTTTTG/indelG/indel71%100%Nsp6ΔSGF (aa106–108)
14,40814,397CTT97%100%Nsp12P323L
21,61421,603CTT78%100%SpikeL18F
21,80121,790ACC96%100%SpikeD80A
22,20622,195AGG93%100%SpikeD215G
22,281–22,28922,275CTTGCTTACC/indelC/indel92%100%SpikeΔLAL (aa242–244)
22,81322,793GTT90%100%SpikeK417N
23,01222,992GAA96%100%SpikeE484K
23,06323,043ATT96%100%SpikeN501Y
23,40323,383AGG96%100%SpikeD614G
23,66423,644CTT90%100%SpikeA701V
25,56325,543GTT95%100%ORF3aQ57H
25,78425,764GTT89%100%ORF3aW131L
25,90425,884CTT89%100%ORF3aS171L
26,45626,436CTT88%100%E geneP71L
27,67027,650GTT90%100%ORF7aV93F
28,25328,233CTT99%92%ORF8No AA Change
28,88728,867CTT98%99%N geneT205I
Table 6. Variants in the BQ-RSA-p4 and BQ-RSA-p5 specific to virus grown on Calu-3 cells.
Table 6. Variants in the BQ-RSA-p4 and BQ-RSA-p5 specific to virus grown on Calu-3 cells.
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide in NR-54974Variant Frequency BQ-RSA-p4Variant Frequency BQ-RSA-P5GeneAmino Acid Mutation
11,02011,018CCT87%99%Nsp6No AA Change
13,33913,328TTG89%95%Nsp10N105K
28,36828,348GGA93%99%N geneR32H
29,82129,801TTG90%98%3′ UTRnoncoding
Table 7. De novo variants in the BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5 stocks.
Table 7. De novo variants in the BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5 stocks.
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide Variant in BQ-RSA-p4 and -p5Variant
Frequency BQ-RSA-p4
Variant Frequency BQ-RSA-p5GeneAmino Acid Mutation
29692967AAG3%16%Nsp3M902V
18,53518,524AAG9%56%Nsp14I6091V
21,63321,622TTC1%8%SL24S
23,04423,024AAG4%17%SNo AA Change
24,61924,599AAG4%16%SNo AA Change
26,25026,230CCT16%11%ENo AA Change
26,45326,533TTG8%54%EV70G
26,46526,545TTC3%16%EL74P
Table 8. Variants present only in NR-54974-p5 at a frequency of greater than 5%.
Table 8. Variants present only in NR-54974-p5 at a frequency of greater than 5%.
Position in MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequencePosition in EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceReported MN908947 Wuhan-Hu-1 SequenceReported EPI_ISL_ 678615 Reference SequenceNucleotide Variant in NR-54974-p5Variant FrequencyGeneAmino Acid Mutation
96939691CC T13%Nsp4A3143V
25,40625,386TTG12%ORF3aM5R
25,41825,398CCT5%ORF3aY9I
26,25026,230CCT45%ENo AA Change
26,46126,442CTTCTGCTTCTGC13%E5nt deletion
29,27429,254CCT9%NT334I
29,65929,639CC T35%ORF10No AA Change
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baczenas, J.J.; Andersen, H.; Rashid, S.; Yarmosh, D.; Puthuveetil, N.; Parker, M.; Bradford, R.; Florence, C.; Stemple, K.J.; Lewis, M.G.; et al. Propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 Cells to Eliminate Mutations in the Furin Cleavage Site of Spike. Viruses 2021, 13, 2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122434

AMA Style

Baczenas JJ, Andersen H, Rashid S, Yarmosh D, Puthuveetil N, Parker M, Bradford R, Florence C, Stemple KJ, Lewis MG, et al. Propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 Cells to Eliminate Mutations in the Furin Cleavage Site of Spike. Viruses. 2021; 13(12):2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122434

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baczenas, John James, Hanne Andersen, Sujatha Rashid, David Yarmosh, Nikhita Puthuveetil, Michael Parker, Rebecca Bradford, Clint Florence, Kimberly J. Stemple, Mark G. Lewis, and et al. 2021. "Propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 Cells to Eliminate Mutations in the Furin Cleavage Site of Spike" Viruses 13, no. 12: 2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122434

APA Style

Baczenas, J. J., Andersen, H., Rashid, S., Yarmosh, D., Puthuveetil, N., Parker, M., Bradford, R., Florence, C., Stemple, K. J., Lewis, M. G., & O’Connor, S. L. (2021). Propagation of SARS-CoV-2 in Calu-3 Cells to Eliminate Mutations in the Furin Cleavage Site of Spike. Viruses, 13(12), 2434. https://doi.org/10.3390/v13122434

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop