Next Article in Journal
Modeling SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mice Using Lentiviral hACE2 Vectors Infers Two Modes of Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Next Article in Special Issue
Could Phylogenetic Analysis Be Used for Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) Classification?
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of an ASFV RNA Helicase Gene A859L for Virus Replication and Swine Virulence
Previous Article in Special Issue
Establishment of Outbreak Thresholds for Hepatitis A in South Africa Using Laboratory Surveillance, 2017–2020
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Public Health Sciences Division, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
2
Quintepa Computing LLC, Nashville, TN 37205, USA
3
Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
4
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
5
Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
6
Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
7
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Clinical Research Division, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2022, 14(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 6 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Viral Infections in Developing Countries)

Abstract

The emergence and establishment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants of interest (VOIs) and variants of concern (VOCs) highlight the importance of genomic surveillance. We propose a statistical learning strategy (SLS) for identifying and spatiotemporally tracking potentially relevant Spike protein mutations. We analyzed 167,893 Spike protein sequences from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases in the United States (excluding 21,391 sequences from VOI/VOC strains) deposited at GISAID from 19 January 2020 to 15 March 2021. Alignment against the reference Spike protein sequence led to the identification of viral residue variants (VRVs), i.e., residues harboring a substitution compared to the reference strain. Next, generalized additive models were applied to model VRV temporal dynamics and to identify VRVs with significant and substantial dynamics (false discovery rate q-value < 0.01; maximum VRV proportion >10% on at least one day). Unsupervised learning was then applied to hierarchically organize VRVs by spatiotemporal patterns and identify VRV-haplotypes. Finally, homology modeling was performed to gain insight into the potential impact of VRVs on Spike protein structure. We identified 90 VRVs, 71 of which had not previously been observed in a VOI/VOC, and 35 of which have emerged recently and are durably present. Our analysis identified 17 VRVs ~91 days earlier than their first corresponding VOI/VOC publication. Unsupervised learning revealed eight VRV-haplotypes of four VRVs or more, suggesting two emerging strains (B1.1.222 and B.1.234). Structural modeling supported a potential functional impact of the D1118H and L452R mutations. The SLS approach equally monitors all Spike residues over time, independently of existing phylogenic classifications, and is complementary to existing genomic surveillance methods.
Keywords: homology modelling; SARS-CoV-2; Spike protein; statistical learning; unsupervised learning; variants of concern; variants of interest; viral residue variant homology modelling; SARS-CoV-2; Spike protein; statistical learning; unsupervised learning; variants of concern; variants of interest; viral residue variant

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, L.P.; Lybrand, T.P.; Gilbert, P.B.; Hawn, T.R.; Schiffer, J.T.; Stamatatos, L.; Payne, T.H.; Carpp, L.N.; Geraghty, D.E.; Jerome, K.R. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy. Viruses 2022, 14, 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009

AMA Style

Zhao LP, Lybrand TP, Gilbert PB, Hawn TR, Schiffer JT, Stamatatos L, Payne TH, Carpp LN, Geraghty DE, Jerome KR. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy. Viruses. 2022; 14(1):9. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Lue Ping, Terry P. Lybrand, Peter B. Gilbert, Thomas R. Hawn, Joshua T. Schiffer, Leonidas Stamatatos, Thomas H. Payne, Lindsay N. Carpp, Daniel E. Geraghty, and Keith R. Jerome. 2022. "Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy" Viruses 14, no. 1: 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009

APA Style

Zhao, L. P., Lybrand, T. P., Gilbert, P. B., Hawn, T. R., Schiffer, J. T., Stamatatos, L., Payne, T. H., Carpp, L. N., Geraghty, D. E., & Jerome, K. R. (2022). Tracking SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Mutations in the United States (January 2020—March 2021) Using a Statistical Learning Strategy. Viruses, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14010009

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop