Next Article in Journal
Antibodies to Crucial Epitopes on HSV-2 Glycoprotein D as a Guide to Dosing an mRNA Genital Herpes Vaccine
Next Article in Special Issue
Elevated Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in People Living with HIV
Previous Article in Journal
Swine Norovirus: Past, Present, and Future
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparing Immune Responses to Inactivated Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 between People Living with HIV and HIV-Negative Individuals: A Cross-Sectional Study in China
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Impact of Genital Ulcers on HIV Transmission Has Been Underestimated—A Critical Review

Viruses 2022, 14(3), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030538
by João Dinis Sousa 1,2,*, Viktor Müller 3 and Anne-Mieke Vandamme 1,2,4
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Viruses 2022, 14(3), 538; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14030538
Submission received: 15 February 2022 / Revised: 2 March 2022 / Accepted: 3 March 2022 / Published: 5 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Fight between Human Beings and HIV: 40th Anniversary and Beyond)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors did answer to my questions and supplement the discussion regarding the sources of bias. The main limitation is still the scarcity of the number of studies publishing undiluted RR and available datasets, limiting the generalization of the results and yielding to a large uncertainty in the increased risk.

This limitation could be added to the final conclusion.

Author Response

We respond to the Reviewer in the uploaded file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

HIV infection and sexually transmitted diseases remain major public health concerns that affect people living in settings with limited resources, including limited access to health care and medications, significantly harder than populations with comprehensive health care coverage and access to medications. The meta analysis and review by Sousa and colleagues provides support for the notion that the role of diseases associated with genital ulcers or infections causing them in HIV infections has been underestimated. Moreover, the authors suggest an update of HIV care information and recommendations.
While the studies reviewed and subjected to the meta analysis are limited in number as wells as geographically and in terms of the time periods they cover, the authors acknowledge those issues. The data also suggests that further studies are needed both analytically and interventionally to address the problem. It would be helpful, if the authors could include in table 1 the number of subjects of each study and also summarize other demographic information. That could increase the impact of the manuscript and strengthen the argument for further studies with regard to numbers of people who should be enrolled and what geographic location have been covered or need to be studied in the future in order generate additional statistically meaningful data.

Author Response

We respond to the Reviewer in the uploaded file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop