Next Article in Journal
Vaccination, Risk Factors and Outcomes of COVID-19 Infection in Patients with Psoriasis—A Single Centre Real-Life Experience from Eastern Slovakia
Next Article in Special Issue
The Usefulness of the C2HEST Risk Score in Predicting Clinical Outcomes among Hospitalized Subjects with COVID-19 and Coronary Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Six-Month Follow-Up of Immune Responses after a Rapid Mass Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with BNT162b2 in the District of Schwaz/Austria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fixed-Dose Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Pulmonary Embolism Associated with COVID-19
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 14
Issue 8
10.3390/v14081644
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

Myocardial Infarction Following COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc?

by
Arianna Baronti
1,†,
Francesco Gentile
2,†,
Alice Chiara Manetti
1,
Andrea Scatena
1,
Silvia Pellegrini
3,
Angela Pucci
4,
Maria Franzini
5,
Vincenzo Castiglione
2,6,
Aniello Maiese
1,
Alberto Giannoni
2,6,
Mauro Pistello
7,
Michele Emdin
2,6,*,
Giovanni Donato Aquaro
2 and
Marco Di Paolo
1
1
Institute of Legal Medicine, Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
2
Fondazione Toscana G. Monasterio, 56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
4
Department of Histopathology, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
5
Department of Translational Research and of New Surgical and Medical Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
6
Health Science Interdisciplinary Center, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, 56127 Pisa, Italy
7
Retrovirus Center and Virology Section, Department of Translational Research, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Viruses 2022, 14(8), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081644
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 22 July 2022 / Accepted: 25 July 2022 / Published: 27 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue COVID-19 and Cardiac Injury)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Vaccination against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is the safest and most effective strategy for controlling the pandemic. However, some cases of acute cardiac events following vaccine administration have been reported, including myocarditis and myocardial infarction (MI). While post-vaccine myocarditis has been widely discussed, information about post-vaccine MI is scarce and heterogenous, often lacking in histopathological and pathophysiological details. We hereby present five cases (four men, mean age 64 years, range 50–76) of sudden death secondary to MI and tightly temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination. In each case, comprehensive macro- and microscopic pathological analyses were performed, including post-mortem cardiac magnetic resonance, to ascertain the cause of death. To investigate the pathophysiological determinants of MI, toxicological and tryptase analyses were performed, yielding negative results, while the absence of anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies ruled out vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia. Finally, genetic testing disclosed that all subjects were carriers of at least one pro-thrombotic mutation. Although the presented cases do not allow us to establish any causative relation, they should foster further research to investigate the possible link between COVID-19 vaccination, pro-thrombotic genotypes, and acute cardiovascular events.

1. Introduction

The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic and its related disease (COVID-19) have fostered strenuous efforts toward finding an effective preventive strategy [1,2]. Following the encouraging results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [3], the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty®, BioNTech/Pfizer, Mainz, Germany), followed by mRNA1273 (Spikevax®, Moderna, Cambridge, MA, USA), Ad26.COV2.S (Janssen®, Johnson&Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA), and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19/AZD1222 (Vaxzevria®, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK), received emergency approval from international regulatory agencies and were administered on a global scale. More recently, NVX-CoV2373, a vaccine made up of spike protein trimers assembled into nanoparticles (Novavax®, Novavax Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA), has been approved for human use. Over the last 2 years, vaccination has been confirmed as the safest and most effective strategy for containing the pandemic [3,4], and as of May 2022, about 10 billion doses were administered worldwide [5,6,7]. Nevertheless, considering the preventive nature of vaccines, tight control of their safety profile over time is necessary. Since even large RCTs might be underpowered to detect rare adverse events (AEs), the vaccination campaign is continuously monitored to report any AE; establish their severity; and, whenever possible, assess causality relations as part of the safety surveillance or pharmacovigilance campaign [8,9].
Various case reports or case series have already reported acute cardiovascular events of either an inflammatory (e.g., myocarditis) or thromboembolic nature (e.g., venous thromboembolism, stroke, or myocardial infarction—MI) and have been potentially associated, at least temporally, to COVID-19 vaccines [10]. Although the precise number of post-vaccination MI is difficult to retrieve, a recent systematic review reported 35 non-fatal MI cases (28 men, mean age 65 years, range 59–74) [10].
Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) has been identified as a possible mechanism [11], but, the pathogenic noxa underlying most cases remains undetermined [10]. Furthermore, considering the high incidence of MI in the general population, a temporal correlation with the vaccination is not sufficient to establish a causal relationship [12]. Since a more comprehensive autoptic evaluation of lethal cases may provide crucial pathophysiological details [13,14,15,16], we analyzed all of the cases of fatal MI temporally related to COVID-19 vaccination referred to our institute, complementing the macroscopic and microscopic examinations with post-mortem cardiac magnetic resonance (PM-CMR) and genetic tests. Furthermore, considering that some specific genotypes may be predisposed to thrombotic events in the presence of various triggers, we investigated the prevalence of these polymorphisms in the study subjects.

2. Methods

2.1. Inclusion Criteria

Since the beginning of the National vaccination campaign in Italy (January 2020 to March 2022), all cases of sudden cardiac death that were referred for a judicial autopsy at the Institute of Legal Medicine of Pisa (Italy) and the cases that were temporally related to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine were considered for this study.

2.2. Exclusion Criteria

An infection from SARS-CoV-2 at the time of death, extracardiac causes of sudden death (e.g., pulmonary, cerebral), and the presence of putrefactive phenomena were considered as exclusion criteria. Therefore, before autopsy, a nasopharyngeal swab was obtained in order to detect SARS-CoV-2 and then analyzed according to the current recommendations [17]. In the case of a sudden cardiac death, all autoptic studies were performed within 24 h from death, in accordance with the guidelines of the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology, [18], and a sequential approach was performed to exclude other extra-cardiac causes of sudden death.

2.3. Post-Mortem Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

In the case of an absence of signs of MI during the external inspection of the heart, a PM-CMR was performed, before proceeding with further histopathological analyses. All of the exams were performed 7 days after heart fixation using a 1.5-Tesla MR scanner (Signa HD CVi and Signa Artist, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) with a multichannel cardiac phased array coil, as previously described [19,20]. The acquisition protocol included a whole-heart 3D steady state free precession (SSFP) pulse sequence, T1- and T2-weighted sequences, and T1 and T2 mapping. Dedicated post-processing software (CVI-42 Circle) was used to analyze the acquired images [21].

2.4. Histopathological and Immunohistochemical Analysis

After the PM-CMR, the cardiac tissues were examined according to established protocols [18]. The epicardial coronary arteries were serially cut (after the decalcification of the calcified vessels) at 5 mm intervals and visually examined. After the external examination and inspection, each heart was cut along the short axis from the apex to the mid-ventricular level, at 10 mm-thick cuts, and each slice was visually inspected to evaluate any macroscopic change. All of the specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE), stained with hematoxylin–eosin (H&E), and microscopically analyzed by using a Leica DM4000B optical microscope (Leica Microsystems).
In the cases with a suspicion of MI during the PM-CMR but lacking any macroscopic signs, an immunohistochemical analysis was also performed. Briefly, the serial 3 mm-thick FFPE heart sections were mounted on slices covered with 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (Fluka Chemie AG), and single immunostainings were performed by using specific antisera raised against anti-gap junction proteins, including Connexin-43 (CX43 polyclonal antibody, Elabscience cat. No. E-AB-30999) and non-phosphorylated (np) Cx43 (monoclonal antibody, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat. No. 13-8300), as previously described [22]. The reactions were revealed by the immunoperoxidase technique with a 3′-5′-diaminobenzidine chromogen substrate. The stained slides were blindly and independently evaluated by 2 expert examiners (AP and MDP), who considered an increased npCx43/Cx43 expression ratio in the cytoplasm and in the intercalated discs to be diagnostic of MI, concomitant to the decreased Cx43 immunoreactivity, as previously validated [22].

2.5. Toxicological Analysis

A comprehensive toxicological examination using liquid chromatography–high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) was performed on venous blood samples, screening for ethanol, cocaine, benzodiazepines, ketamine, norketamine, opioids, methadone, amphetamine, meta-amphetamines, and cannabinoids.

2.6. Antibodies Anti-Platelet Factor 4 and Tryptase Analysis

The presence of the anti-platelet factor 4 (anti-PF4) antibodies and the tryptase serum concentration were evaluated to rule out the diagnosis of VITT and anaphylaxis. Serum samples that were obtained through a venous blood centrifugation (10,000× g, 10′, room temperature) were screened for the presence of anti-PF4/polyanion complex antibodies, using the commercially available PF4 IgG test (Immucor GTI Diagnostics). The tryptase concentration was determined by the ImmuoCAP assay using the automated Phadia 250 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

2.7. Genetic Analysis

Whole blood samples collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tubes were used for the genomic DNA extraction and genotyping and executed using the CE-In Vitro Diagnostic (IVD) validated ELITe InGenius instrument (EliTech Group, Puteaux, France). In particular, (a) Factor V G1691A (Leiden), Factor II G20210A, and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotypes were assessed by the Coagulation ELITe MGB kit (EliTech Group, Puteaux, France), i.e., a real-time polymerase chain reaction assay designed to discriminate the allelic variants by analyzing the amplicon melt-curves; (b) MTHFR A1298C and Factor V A4070G (FV-HR2) were genotyped using the quantitative-PCR Alert AmpliMIX (EliTech Group) and an allele-specific fluorescent probe hybridization; (c) Factor XIII V34L (g.6318795C > A), HPA-1 a/b (GPIIIa g.1565T > C), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G (g.101126425_101126426insG), and Beta-Fibrinogen 455G > A were genotyped using a Duplic α Real-time genotyping kit (Euroclone), and an allele-specific fluorescent probe hybridization. While the pro-thrombotic role of some of these polymorphisms has been widely confirmed (e.g., for Factor II G20210A and Factor V G1691A), it is less clear for others, such as the MTHFR variants, whose clinical significance is proportional to the related hyperhomocysteinemia [23].

3. Results—Case Description

Finally, a total of five cases of sudden cardiac death temporally related to the administration of a COVID-19 vaccine were referred to our institute for autopsy between February 2021 and December 2021. Since all of the nasopharyngeal swabs were negative for SARS-CoV-2 and neither extracardiac causes of sudden deaths nor putrefactive phenomena were detected, all of the subjects were enrolled in the study. A brief description of the cases (four men and one woman, mean age 64 years, range 50–76) is provided in Table 1 and Table 2. Three subjects had previously known medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus (#1), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (#1), hypertension (#4), and cocaine abuse history (#5).
In all of the cases, mRNA vaccines were administered: the BNT162b2 vaccine in four cases, as either the first (n = 2, #1 and #3) or the second (n = 2, #2 and #4) dose, and a first dose of mRNA1273 in the remaining case (#5). The vaccination-to-death interval was <24 h in two cases (#2 and #5), 24–72 h in two other cases (#1 and #4), and 21 days in the last case (#3). In three cases (#1, #2, and #4), death was unwitnessed, although in the preceding hours, the deceased had reported symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia (e.g., thoracic pain) to family members. In the other two cases (#3 and #5), the circumstances of death and symptoms remained unknown.
While the macroscopic signs of MI were observed in two cases (#1 and #3), characterized by myocardial wall rupture and hemopericardium in the posterior wall of the left ventricle in both cases (Figure 1), no gross alterations were observed in the other cases (#2, #4, and #5). A PM-CMR was therefore performed in these cases. The PM-CMR showed ischemic lesions in all of the hearts that presented with signs of hyperacute myocardial ischemia (subendocardial hypointensity in T2-FSE and low T2 at mapping) and with surrounding oedema (higher myocardial T1 in the border zone). Moreover, the 3D-SSFP sequence reconstruction unveiled obstructive or sub-obstructive coronary artery stenosis in each case (Figure 2). Such findings were confirmed in the macroscopic examination of the coronary arteries, showing the three-vessel disease in all of the cases, with a fresh thrombus in four individuals (#1, #2, #4, and #5), involving either the left anterior descending artery (#2, #4, and #5) or the right coronary artery (#1).
Through the microscopic examinations, findings of early MI were detected in four cases (#1, #2, #4, and #5), in which the only histological changes were signs of stretching and waviness of the fibers, while in case #3, the histology was compatible with a 15/20-day-old MI, showing some macrophage infiltration of the necrotic infarcted area and granulation of the tissue at its margins, as previously described [24]. Furthermore, in cases #2, #4, and #5, findings suggesting acute ischemia were documented through an immunohistochemical analysis (Figure 3).
Finally, the toxicological screening, anti-PF4 antibodies, and tryptase analyses yielded negative results in all of the cases. Through genetic testing, all of the subjects were identified as carriers of ≥1 MTHFR pro-thrombotic allele, and four individuals (#1, #2, #3, and #4) were also carriers of one or two PAI-1 4G alleles (Table 3).

4. Discussion

In this original series, we presented the pathological features of five cases of sudden death temporally related to the administration of a vaccination against COVID-19 and referred to the Institute of Legal Medicine of Pisa for post-mortem investigations. To ascertain the cause of death of these subjects, a comprehensive autoptic study was conducted, complemented by radiological (PM-CMR), histological, immunohistochemical, toxicological, and genetic investigations. Notably, MI was identified as the cause of death, and a consistent temporal relationship between the MI occurrence and the vaccine administration was observed in all cases. A cardiac rupture with tamponade was the cause of death in two cases, whereas non-mechanical MI complications could have been the final cause of death in the other cases.
Although coronary artery lesions of variable severity were found in all of the cases, none of the subjects had a known previous history of cardiovascular disease, except for the presence of some common risk factors. The toxicological screening as well as the tryptase quantification were negative in all cases. While the absence of anti-PF4 antibodies virtually ruled out the diagnosis of VITT, and genetic testing revealed that all of the subjects were carriers of at least one pro-thrombotic mutation.
In the last 2 years, several RCTs and observational studies have confirmed that a global vaccination against COVID-19 is the most effective and safest strategy in order to contain the pandemic [25,26,27,28]. AEs after a COVID-19 vaccination are very rare. However, considering their preventive nature, the safety of vaccines is paramount, and the International Regulatory Agencies recommend tight control of any possible AEs, and the assessment of their epidemiological and clinical characteristics. Indeed, the vaccination campaign is still ongoing and almost certainly will be prolonged over time. Therefore, the identification of subjects at risk of severe AEs could be crucial in order to reassess the risk–benefit ratio of the vaccination in specific circumstances.
Unfortunately, establishing a causal link between an AE and anti-COVID-19 vaccination may not be easy, particularly in the case of relatively frequent conditions such as cardiovascular events [29]. Therefore, although the suggestive temporal correlation, no definitive causal relationship with vaccine administration could be postulated in the subjects analyzed in this series.
To date, various studies have reported a possible association between cardiovascular events and COVID-19 vaccination [10,30], unveiling a pathophysiological link in the case of VITT [11,31,32,33,34]. Accordingly, among the cases of MI temporally related to vaccine administration [15,35,36,37,38,39,40], VITT was identified as the possible underlying pathogenic mechanism in one subject [41]. Of note, among the five subjects analyzed, testing for anti-PF4 antibodies was negative in all cases, suggesting that VITT was not implicated. Similarly to our observations, Tajstra et al. described a case of fatal MI secondary to the multivessel coronary thrombosis in an 86-year-old man 30 min after vaccine administration, though no pathophysiological mechanisms were identified [36]. On the other hand, in a case series including three subjects who presented with cardiac-related manifestations shortly after the COVID-19 vaccination, the final diagnosis was different in each patient and included acute MI, stress-induced cardiomyopathy, and MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries [38]. Therefore, other possible mechanisms have been proposed to explain the potential relationship between MI and COVID-19 vaccination. Among these, a disproportionate stress-related adrenergic reaction might contribute to a coronary spasm, plaque erosion, and acute thrombosis [38]. Similarly, an intense inflammatory reaction to the vaccines might be involved. Notably, Kounis syndrome has been historically described as the occurrence of an acute coronary syndrome following either vaccination or exposure to other allergens [42]. Although the precise mechanisms have yet to be clarified, hypersensitivity, cellular, and biohumoral mediators might promote a coronary spasm, plaque erosion, and pro-thrombotic cascades [43]. Although in the presented cases, negative tryptase testing virtually ruled out allergic reactions, it could not be excluded that the delayed sample collection might have yielded some false-negative results secondary to the post-mortem degradation, as reported in up to 20% of cases of Kounis syndrome [44].
Contrary to the case reports published so far, we also performed a comprehensive genetic analysis in order to identify the pro-thrombotic genotypes. Interestingly, although in the absence of any previous history of thromboembolic events, all subjects were carriers of at least one pro-thrombotic allele of the MTHFR gene. Specifically, two subjects were heterozygotes for both MTHFR C677T and A1298C, one subject was homozygous for MTHFR A1298C-C, one subject was heterozygous for MTHFR C677T, and one subject was heterozygous for MTHFR A1298C. The MTHFR enzyme converts 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate into 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, producing a methyl donor for the re-methylation of homocysteine into methionine. The C677T and the A1289C polymorphisms produce an alanine into valine and a glutamate into an alanine substitution in the MTHFR enzyme, respectively, both of which may blunt enzymatic activity, thereby predisposing them to thrombotic events [45,46]. Interestingly, it has been reported that these polymorphisms might be associated with a greater severity and mortality consequent to COVID-19 [47,48].
Beyond MTHFR, four of the studied subjects were also carriers of one or two 4G alleles of the PAI-1. Briefly, PAI-1 is a serine protease involved in fibrinolysis by inhibiting the tissue plasminogen activator. The deletion/insertion of polymorphisms with four (4G) or five (5G) guanosine residues have been associated with an increased mRNA transcription and PAI-1 concentration, thus reducing fibrinolysis and increasing the risk of venous thromboembolism [49].
Whether the coexistence of both MTHFR and PAI-1 pro-thrombotic polymorphisms might have contributed to the risk of MI in the studied subjects remains unknown, although such an incremental risk has been described for thrombotic events in other settings [50,51].
However, it should be recognized that none of the subjects were carriers for any mutations definitively associated with an increased pro-thrombotic risk (such as Factor II G20210A and Factor V G1691A) [23]. On the other hand, the genetic variants identified are not rare in the general population: the double heterozygosity (677 TC/1298 AC) of MTHFR has a frequency of about 34%, while the 1289 CC genotype is present in 9.4% of subjects [52], whose pro-thrombotic risk depends on the presence and severity of hyperhomocysteinemia [23]. Similarly, the PAI-1 4G/4G genotype has a frequency of 29%, while the 4G/5G genotype is present in up to 50% of subjects, being only slightly more prevalent among individuals suffering from cerebrovascular events [52].
Considering these observations, despite the suggestive temporal relation and the possible predisposing pro-thrombotic genotypes of the studied subjects, a direct role of COVID-19 vaccination as a trigger for MI occurrence could not be extrapolated. The reported findings should therefore be interpreted with caution but may stimulate future research on the potential pathophysiological association between the COVID-19 vaccination, pro-thrombotic genotypes, and cardiovascular events.

5. Conclusions

Herein, we presented five cases of fatal MI temporally related to the COVID-19 vaccination. Given the limited sample size, these findings do not support a causal relationship between the vaccine administration and the risk of MI. However, considering the ongoing worldwide vaccination campaign, identifying any possible vaccine-related AE is of paramount importance. Adopting a standardized and comprehensive methodology when analyzing and describing these cases is therefore warranted. Notably, in the reported cases, macroscopic, histopathological, immunohistochemical, toxicological, and biohumoral tests did not provide any pathophysiological detail regarding the possible mechanisms leading to the fatal event, whereas the genetic analysis revealed the presence of pro-thrombotic genotypes in all subjects.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.D.P. and M.E.; methodology, A.B., A.C.M., A.S., S.P., A.P., M.F., A.M., G.D.A. and M.D.P.; formal analysis, A.B., A.C.M., A.S., S.P., A.P., M.F., A.M., G.D.A. and M.D.P.; data curation, A.B., F.G., A.C.M., A.S., S.P., A.P., M.F., A.M., G.D.A. and M.D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, F.G. and A.B.; writing—review and editing, V.C., A.G., M.P., M.E. and M.D.P.; supervision, M.P., M.E. and M.D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All of the procedures conformed with the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Boards and ethics committees. All of the data were anonymized in full respect with current legislation in terms of privacy, and consent to participate was collected from the appropriate institutions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krammer, F. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in development. Nature 2020, 586, 516–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organization. The Different Types of COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/the-race-for-a-covid-19-vaccine-explained (accessed on 4 March 2022).
  3. Korang, S.K.; von Rohden, E.; Veroniki, A.A.; Ong, G.; Ngalamika, O.; Siddiqui, F.; Juul, S.; Nielsen, E.E.; Feinberg, J.B.; Petersen, J.J.; et al. Vaccines to prevent COVID-19: A living systematic review with Trial Sequential Analysis and network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0260733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. COVID 19—How to Protect Yourself & Others. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/prevention.html (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  5. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard—Overview. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  6. Ministero della Salute. Report Vaccini Anti COVID-19. Available online: https://www.governo.it/it/cscovid19/report-vaccini/ (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  7. European Medicines Agency. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines. Available online: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/vaccines-covid-19/safety-covid-19-vaccines (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  8. World Health Organization. Manufacturing, Safety and Quality Control of Vaccines. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/manufacturing-safety-and-quality-control (accessed on 5 March 2022).
  9. Klein, N.P.; Lewis, N.; Goddard, K.; Fireman, B.; Zerbo, O.; Hanson, K.E.; Donahue, J.G.; Kharbanda, E.O.; Naleway, A.; Nelson, J.C.; et al. Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination. JAMA 2021, 326, 1390–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Aye, Y.N.; Mai, A.S.; Zhang, A.; Lim, O.Z.H.; Lin, N.; Ng, C.H.; Chan, M.Y.; Yip, J.; Loh, P.-H.; Chew, N.W.S. Acute myocardial infarction and myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination. QJM Int. J. Med. 2021, hcab252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hippisley-Cox, J.; Patone, M.; Mei, X.W.; Saatci, D.; Dixon, S.; Khunti, K.; Zaccardi, F.; Watkinson, P.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Doidge, J.C. Risk of thrombocytopenia and thromboembolism after COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 positive testing: Self-controlled case series study. BMJ 2021, 374, n1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Virani, S.S.; Alonso, A.; Aparicio, H.J.; Benjamin, E.J.; Bittencourt, M.S.; Callaway, C.W.; Carson, A.P.; Chamberlain, A.M.; Cheng, S.; Delling, F.N.; et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2021 Update. Circulation 2021, 143, E254–E743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lathrop, S.L.; Ball, R.; Haber, P.; Mootrey, G.T.; Braun, M.; Shadomy, S.V.; Ellenberg, S.S.; Chen, R.T.; Hayes, E.B. Adverse event reports following vaccination for Lyme disease: December 1998–July 2000. Vaccine 2002, 20, 1603–1608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Moro, P.L.; Arana, J.; Cano, M.; Lewis, P.; Shimabukuro, T.T. Deaths Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, 1997–2013. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Schneider, J.; Sottmann, L.; Greinacher, A.; Hagen, M.; Kasper, H.-U.; Kuhnen, C.; Schlepper, S.; Schmidt, S.; Schulz, R.; Thiele, T.; et al. Postmortem investigation of fatalities following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines. Int. J. Legal Med. 2021, 135, 2335–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maiese, A.; Baronti, A.; Manetti, A.C.; Di Paolo, M.; Turillazzi, E.; Frati, P.; Fineschi, V. Death after the Administration of COVID-19 Vaccines Approved by EMA: Has a Causal Relationship Been Demonstrated? Vaccines 2022, 10, 308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Gruppo di Lavoro ISS Diagnostica e sorveglianza microbiologica COVID-19: Aspetti di analisi molecolare e sierologica. In Raccomandazioni per il Corretto Prelievo, Conservazione e Analisi sul Tampone Oro/Rino-Faringeo per la Diagnosi di COVID-19; Istituto Superiore di Sanità: Roma, Italy, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  18. Basso, C.; Basso, C.; Aguilera, B.; Banner, J.; Cohle, S.; d’Amati, G.; de Gouveia, R.H.; di Gioia, C.; Fabre, A.; Gallagher, P.J.; et al. Guidelines for autopsy investigation of sudden cardiac death: 2017 update from the Association for European Cardiovascular Pathology. Virchows Arch. 2017, 471, 691–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Aquaro, G.D.; Di Paolo, M.; Guidi, B.; Ghabisonia, K.; Pucci, A.; Aringheri, G.; Gorgodze, N.; Veronica, M.; Chiti, E.; Burchielli, S.; et al. Post-mortem CMR in a model of sudden death due to myocardial ischemia: Validation with connexin-43. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 8098–8107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Guidi, B.; Aquaro, G.D.; Gesi, M.; Emdin, M.; di Paolo, M. Postmortem cardiac magnetic resonance in sudden cardiac death. Heart Fail. Rev. 2018, 23, 651–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aquaro, G.D.; Camastra, G.; Monti, L.; Lombardi, M.; Pepe, A.; Castelletti, S.; Maestrini, V.; Todiere, G.; Masci, P.; di Giovine, G.; et al. Reference values of cardiac volumes, dimensions, and new functional parameters by MR: A multicenter, multivendor study. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017, 45, 1055–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Turillazzi, E.; Di Paolo, M.; Neri, M.; Riezzo, I.; Fineschi, V. A theoretical timeline for myocardial infarction: Immunohistochemical evaluation and western blot quantification for Interleukin-15 and Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 as early markers. J. Transl. Med. 2014, 12, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Varela, M.L.I.; Adamczuk, Y.P.; Forastiero, R.R.; Martinuzzo, E.M.; Cerrato, G.S.; Pombo, G.; Carreras, O.L. Major and potential prothrombotic genotypes in a cohort of patients with venous thromboembolism. Thromb. Res. 2001, 104, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. O’Rourke, M.F. Subacute heart rupture following myocardial infarction. Clinical features of a correctable condition. Lancet 1973, 2, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jamaludin, S.; Azmir, N.A.; Ayob, A.F.M.; Zainal, N. COVID-19 exit strategy: Transitioning towards a new normal. Ann. Med. Surg. 2020, 59, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rahmani, A.M.; Mirmahaleh, S.Y.H. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) prevention and treatment methods and effective parameters: A systematic literature review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 64, 102568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gasmi, A.; Noor, S.; Tippairote, T.; Dadar, M.; Menzel, A.; Bjørklund, G. Individual risk management strategy and potential therapeutic options for the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin. Immunol. 2020, 215, 108409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sharma, A.K.; Sharma, V.; Sharma, A.; Pallikkuth, S.; Sharma, A.K. Current Paradigms in COVID-19 Research: Proposed Treatment Strategies, Recent Trends and Future Directions. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020, 28, 3173–3192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. World Health Organization. Causality Assessment of an Adverse Event Following Immunization (AEFI): User Manual for the Revised WHO Classification, 2nd ed., 2019 Update. 2019. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/causality-assessment-aef (accessed on 10 May 2022).
  30. Sessa, F.; Salerno, M.; Esposito, M.; Di Nunno, N.; Zamboni, P.; Pomara, C. Findings and Causality Relationship between Death and COVID-19 Vaccination: A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Favaloro, E.J.; Pasalic, L.; Lippi, G. Review and evolution of guidelines for diagnosis of COVID-19 vaccine induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2022, 60, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. McGonagle, D.; De Marco, G.; Bridgewood, C. Mechanisms of Immunothrombosis in Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT) Compared to Natural SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Autoimmun. 2021, 121, 102662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Greinacher, A.; Langer, F.; Makris, M.; Pai, M.; Pavord, S.; Tran, H.; Warkentin, T.E. Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT): Update on diagnosis and management considering different resources. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2022, 20, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pomara, C.; Sessa, F.; Ciaccio, M.; Dieli, F.; Esposito, M.; Giammanco, G.; Garozzo, S.; Giarratano, A.; Prati, D.; Rappa, F.; et al. COVID-19 Vaccine and Death: Causality Algorithm According to the WHO Eligibility Diagnosis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Edler, C.; Klein, A.; Schröder, A.S.; Sperhake, J.P.; Ondruschka, B. Deaths associated with newly launched SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (Comirnaty®). Leg. Med. Tokyo 2021, 51, 101895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tajstra, M.; Jaroszewicz, J.; Gąsior, M. Acute Coronary Tree Thrombosis After Vaccination for COVID-19. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 2021, 14, e103–e104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fazlollahi, A.; Zahmatyar, M.; Noori, M.; Nejadghaderi, S.A.; Sullman, M.J.M.; Shekarriz-Foumani, R.; Kolahi, A.; Singh, K.; Safiri, S. Cardiac complications following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of case reports and case series. Rev. Med. Virol. 2021, 32, e2318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, E.; Chew, N.W.S.; Ng, P.; Yeo, T.J. A spectrum of cardiac manifestations post Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccination. QJM Int. J. Med. 2021, 114, 661–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Boivin, Z.; Martin, J. Untimely Myocardial Infarction or COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effect. Cureus 2021, 13, e13651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chatterjee, S.; Ojha, U.K.; Vardhan, B.; Tiwari, A. Myocardial infarction after COVID-19 vaccination-casual or causal? Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev. 2021, 15, 1055–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chiang, C.-Y.; Chen, C.-Y.; Yu, W.-L.; Kan, W.-C.; Feng, Y.-H. Myocardial Infarction and Azygos Vein Thrombosis After ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccination in a Hemodialysis Patient. Cureus 2021, 13, e18390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kounis, N.G.; Mazarakis, A.; Tsigkas, G.; Giannopoulos, S.; Goudevenos, J. Kounis syndrome: A new twist on an old disease. Future Cardiol. 2011, 7, 805–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kounis, N.G.; Koniari, I.; de Gregorio, C.; Velissaris, D.; Petalas, K.; Brinia, A.; Assimakopoulos, S.F.; Gogos, C.; Kouni, S.N.; Kounis, G.N.; et al. Allergic Reactions to Current Available COVID-19 Vaccinations: Pathophysiology, Causality, and Therapeutic Considerations. Vaccines 2021, 9, 221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kounis, N.G. Serum tryptase levels and Kounis syndrome. Int. J. Cardiol. 2007, 114, 407–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, W.X.; Dai, S.X.; Zheng, J.J.; Liu, J.Q.; Huang, J.F. Homocysteine metabolism gene polymorphisms (MTHFR C677T, MTHFR A1298C, MTR A2756G and MTRR A66G) jointly elevate the risk of folate deficiency. Nutrients 2015, 7, 6670–6687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chita, D.S.; Tudor, A.; Christodorescu, R.; Buleu, F.N.; Sosdean, R.; Deme, S.M.; Mercea, S.; Moldovan, A.P.; Pah, A.M.; Axelerad, A.D.; et al. MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms Prevalence and Cardiovascular Risk Factors Involved in Cardioembolic Stroke Type and Severity. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ponti, G.; Roli, L.; Oliva, G.; Manfredini, M.; Trenti, T.; Kaleci, S.; Iannella, R.; Balzano, B.; Coppola, A.; Fiorentino, G.; et al. Homocysteine (Hcy) assessment to predict outcomes of hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A multicenter study on 313 COVID-19 patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2021, 59, E354–E357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cappadona, C.; Paraboschi, E.M.; Ziliotto, N.; Bottaro, S.; Rimoldi, V.; Gerussi, A.; Azimonti, A.; Brenna, D.; Brunati, A.; Cameroni, C.; et al. MEDTEC Students against Coronavirus: Investigating the Role of Hemostatic Genes in the Predisposition to COVID-19 Severity. J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11, 1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, Q.; Jin, Y.; Li, X.; Peng, X.; Peng, N.; Song, J.; Xu, M. Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) 4G/5G promoter polymorphisms and risk of venous thromboembolism—A meta-analysis and systematic review. Vasa 2020, 49, 141–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Wang, B.; Xu, P.; Shu, Q.; Yan, S.; Xu, H. Combined Effect of MTHFR C677T and PAI-1 4G/5G Polymorphisms on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Chinese Lung Cancer Patients. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 27, 10760296211031291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Cinemre, H.; Bilir, C.; Akdemir, N. Isolated Renal Vein Thrombosis Associated With MTHFR-1298 and PAI-1 4G Gene Mutations. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2009, 16, 708–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Cernera, G.; Comegna, M.; Gelzo, M.; Savoia, M.; Bruzzese, D.; Mormile, M.; Zarrilli, F.; Amato, F.; Micco, P.; Castaldo, G. Molecular Analysis of Prothrombotic Gene Variants in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and with Transient Ischemic Attack. Med. Kaunas 2021, 57, 723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Viruses 14 01644 g001 550
Figure 1. Gross and microscopic cardiac features in case #1. Panel (a) shows the transmural myocardial rupture. Panel (b) shows the transversal section of the coronary artery with evidence of atherosclerotic changes and an intracoronary clot. In panels (c–f), the histological findings of the myocardial sections are presented (hematoxylin–eosin staining): a fresh thrombus in the coronary artery (c, original magnification 10×); inflammatory infiltrates (neutrophils) and myocyte contraction band necrosis (d, original magnification 20×); myocardium adjacent to the rupture site with intense inflammatory infiltrates, fibrin, and coagulative necrosis (e, original magnification 10×); hemorrhage in the epicardial adipose tissue close to the left ventricular (LV) free wall rupture (f, original magnification 20×).
Figure 1. Gross and microscopic cardiac features in case #1. Panel (a) shows the transmural myocardial rupture. Panel (b) shows the transversal section of the coronary artery with evidence of atherosclerotic changes and an intracoronary clot. In panels (c–f), the histological findings of the myocardial sections are presented (hematoxylin–eosin staining): a fresh thrombus in the coronary artery (c, original magnification 10×); inflammatory infiltrates (neutrophils) and myocyte contraction band necrosis (d, original magnification 20×); myocardium adjacent to the rupture site with intense inflammatory infiltrates, fibrin, and coagulative necrosis (e, original magnification 10×); hemorrhage in the epicardial adipose tissue close to the left ventricular (LV) free wall rupture (f, original magnification 20×).
Viruses 14 01644 g001
Viruses 14 01644 g002 550
Figure 2. Post-mortem Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (PM-CMR) and immunohistochemical staining of case #4. In the panel (a), a T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) image shows the hypointensity of the subendocardial layer of the inferior and inferolateral walls. A decreased T2 was confirmed in the T2 mapping (panel b), whereas T1 hyperintensity and an increased T1 were found in the border zone (T1 FSE of panel c, T1 mapping in panel d). The reconstruction of 3D-SSFP images showed a >90% obstruction of the left circumflex artery (panel e).
Figure 2. Post-mortem Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (PM-CMR) and immunohistochemical staining of case #4. In the panel (a), a T2-weighted fast spin echo (FSE) image shows the hypointensity of the subendocardial layer of the inferior and inferolateral walls. A decreased T2 was confirmed in the T2 mapping (panel b), whereas T1 hyperintensity and an increased T1 were found in the border zone (T1 FSE of panel c, T1 mapping in panel d). The reconstruction of 3D-SSFP images showed a >90% obstruction of the left circumflex artery (panel e).
Viruses 14 01644 g002
Viruses 14 01644 g003 550
Figure 3. Histological and immunohistochemical features of case #4. A fresh sub-occlusive thrombus (a,b) is shown in the lumen of the right coronary artery with fibroatheroma (hematoxylin–eosin staining, original magnification 4× and 10×, respectively); immunohistochemistry (c,d) showed phosphorylated (CX-43) and dephosphorylated connexin-43 (npCX-43) expressions in the ischemic myocardium (original magnification 40×). CX-43 was mainly localized to the cytoplasm (c), whereas npCX43 was mainly expressed at the intercalated disk and almost absent in the cytoplasm (d).
Figure 3. Histological and immunohistochemical features of case #4. A fresh sub-occlusive thrombus (a,b) is shown in the lumen of the right coronary artery with fibroatheroma (hematoxylin–eosin staining, original magnification 4× and 10×, respectively); immunohistochemistry (c,d) showed phosphorylated (CX-43) and dephosphorylated connexin-43 (npCX-43) expressions in the ischemic myocardium (original magnification 40×). CX-43 was mainly localized to the cytoplasm (c), whereas npCX43 was mainly expressed at the intercalated disk and almost absent in the cytoplasm (d).
Viruses 14 01644 g003
Table
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and mode of death.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics and mode of death.
Case NumberSexAge, YearsPrevious Conditions VaccineVaccination-to-Death
Interval		Circumstances of Death and
Previous Symptoms
#1M69DM2, COPD, smokingBNT162b2, 1st dose48 hUnwitnessed
Complained of shivering, thoracic, and upper limbs pain some hours before
#2M58NoneBNT162b2, 2nd dose~8 hUnwitnessed
Complained of thoracic pain < 1 h before
#3M76NoneBNT162b2, 1st dose21 daysUnwitnessed
#4M68HypertensionBNT162b2, 2nd dose72 hSudden death during cycling, preceded by headache and thoracic pain
#5F50Cocaine abuse, smokingmRNA1273, 1st dose<24 hUnwitnessed
COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DM2, type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Table
Table 2. Autoptic, radiological, histological, and laboratory findings.
Table 2. Autoptic, radiological, histological, and laboratory findings.
Case
Number		Macroscopic FindingsPM-CMR FindingsHistological and IHC FindingsMI AgeToxicological ScreeningAnti-PF4Tryptase
#1Hemopericardium, heart laceration on the posterior wall of the left ventricle, pre-existing critical three-vessel atherosclerotic disease, coronary thrombosis Not performedCoronary thrombosis of right coronary artery with significant stenosis. MI at the rupture site.24–48 hNegativeNegativeNegative
#2Pre-existing three-vessel atherosclerotic disease, coronary thrombosis, hypoplastic right coronary arteryIschemic damageCoronary thrombosis of left anterior descending artery. IHC diagnostic of MI.<24 hNegativeNegativeNegative
#3Hemopericardium, heart laceration posterior wall of the left ventricle, pre-existing three-vessel atherosclerotic diseaseNot performedMI at the rupture site.15/20 daysNegativeNegativeNegative
#4Pre-existing three-vessel atherosclerotic disease, coronary thrombosis Ischemic damageCoronary thrombosis of left anterior descending artery. IHC diagnostic of MI.<24 hNegativeNegativeNegative
#5Pre-existing three-vessel atherosclerotic disease, coronary thrombosis Ischemic damageCoronary thrombosis of left anterior descending artery. IHC diagnostic of MI.<24 hNegativeNegativeNegative
Anti-PF4: anti-platelet factor 4; IHC: immunohistochemistry; MI: myocardial infarction; PM-CMR: post-mortem cardiac magnetic resonance.
Table
Table 3. Results of the genetic analysis performed on whole blood samples.
Table 3. Results of the genetic analysis performed on whole blood samples.
Gene VariantCase #1Case #2Case #3Case #4Case #5
MTHFR C677TCTCTCCCTCC
MTHFR A1298CACACCCAAAC
Factor II G20210AGGGGGGGGGG
Factor V G1691AGGGGGGGGGG
Factor V-HR2AGAAAAAAAA
Factor XIII V34LCACACACCCA
HPA-1 a/bTCTCTTTTTT
PAI-1 4G/5G4G/4G4G/5G4G/4G4G/5G5G/5G
Beta-Fibrinogen 455G > AGGGGGGGAGG
HPA: human platelet antigen; MTHFR: methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase; PAI: plasminogen activator inhibitor.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Baronti, A.; Gentile, F.; Manetti, A.C.; Scatena, A.; Pellegrini, S.; Pucci, A.; Franzini, M.; Castiglione, V.; Maiese, A.; Giannoni, A.; et al. Myocardial Infarction Following COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc? Viruses 2022, 14, 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081644

AMA Style

Baronti A, Gentile F, Manetti AC, Scatena A, Pellegrini S, Pucci A, Franzini M, Castiglione V, Maiese A, Giannoni A, et al. Myocardial Infarction Following COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc? Viruses. 2022; 14(8):1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081644

Chicago/Turabian Style

Baronti, Arianna, Francesco Gentile, Alice Chiara Manetti, Andrea Scatena, Silvia Pellegrini, Angela Pucci, Maria Franzini, Vincenzo Castiglione, Aniello Maiese, Alberto Giannoni, and et al. 2022. "Myocardial Infarction Following COVID-19 Vaccine Administration: Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc?" Viruses 14, no. 8: 1644. https://doi.org/10.3390/v14081644

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop