Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Pharmacotherapy in Pregnancy: A Literature Review of Current Therapeutic Choices
Next Article in Special Issue
Challenges in HIV-1 Latent Reservoir and Target Cell Quantification in CAR-T Cell and Other Lentiviral Gene Modifying HIV Cure Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Small RNA Profiling of Cucurbit Yellow Stunting Disorder Virus from Susceptible and Tolerant Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Lines
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of HIV-Resistant CAR T Cells by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated CAR Integration into the CCR5 Locus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Viruses
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/v15030789
viruses-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Opportunities for CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in HIV Cure

by
Gerard Campos-Gonzalez
1,
Javier Martinez-Picado
1,2,3,4,5,
Talia Velasco-Hernandez
6,7 and
Maria Salgado
1,4,5,*
1
IrsiCaixa AIDS Research Institute, 08916 Badalona, Spain
2
University of Vic—Central University of Catalonia (UVic-UCC), 08500 Vic, Spain
3
Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
4
CIBER de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
5
Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), 08916 Badalona, Spain
6
Josep Carreras Leukaemia Research Institute, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
7
RICORS-TERAV, ISCIII, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2023, 15(3), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030789
Submission received: 27 February 2023 / Revised: 15 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 March 2023 / Published: 19 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue CAR-T Cell Therapy for HIV Cure 2023)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) technology is having a huge impact in the blood malignancy field and is becoming a well-established therapy for many types of leukaemia. In recent decades, efforts have been made to demonstrate that CAR-T cells have potential as a therapy to achieve a sterilizing cure for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, translation of this technology to the HIV scenario has not been easy, as many challenges have appeared along the way that hinder the consolidation of CAR-T cells as a putative therapy. Here, we review the origin and development of CAR-T cells, describe the advantages of CAR-T cell therapy in comparison with other therapies, and describe the major obstacles currently faced regarding application of this technology in the HIV field, specifically, viral escape, CAR-T cell infectivity, and accessibility to hidden reservoirs. Nonetheless, promising results in successfully tackling some of these issues that have been obtained in clinical trials suggest a bright future for CAR-T cells as a consolidated therapy.

1. Introduction

A landmark in the history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was long-term suppression of the viral replication, achieved in 1996 by the administration of triple-drug therapy, namely, combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) [1]. This breakthrough made a cure for HIV seem possible for the first time. However, almost simultaneously, it was demonstrated that CD4+ T cells from people with HIV contained integrated HIV-DNA [2]. This phenomenon, which came to be known as latent infection, is the main reason why antiretroviral therapy is not capable of completely eliminating HIV infection [3]. Although the reservoir in blood decreases during cART treatment, after a first reduction, a relatively stable pool of latently infected cells remains [4,5,6,7]. Currently, the persistence of the HIV-1 reservoir is considered a major barrier to achieving virus eradication, even though there is some evidence that curing HIV-1 is a feasible goal.
A small group of people with HIV, known as exceptional elite controllers, are living proof that cure is possible, even if only a functional cure. Exceptional elite controllers have lived with no viral replication, in some cases for more than 30 years [8], and in some cases, presenting immune seroreversion [9]. The causes of this good control are multifactorial, but in most cases, elite controllers have strong immune cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL)-mediated responses, and this, in combination with very low viral reservoir levels, leads to long-term control of viral replication and pathogenesis in the absence of cART [10,11]. Other cohorts of post-treatment controllers [12] and individuals that naturally reduce HIV reservoirs during cART [13,14] are being also studied to confirm that HIV reservoirs can be blocked and reduced. All this evidence suggests that functional cure, even if infrequent, is feasible.
Much more complicated is achieving a fully sterilizing cure. So far, only three cases of HIV cure through a medical intervention have been reported in the scientific literature: the Berlin, London, and Düsseldorf patients [15,16,17,18]. Their cure resulted from an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) with a homozygous donor for CCR5Δ32 deletion to prevent HIV-1 infection of the graft. Additional studies of transplanted HIV individuals have demonstrated that the alloreactivity related to a stem cell transplant is sufficient to achieve a reduction in HIV reservoirs, and frequently causes a delay in viral rebound after cART treatment interruption, even when the protective effect of CCR5Δ32 deletion of the donor is lacking [19,20]. To achieve the goal of a sterilizing cure, therefore, an approach is needed that can mimic the alloreactivity that reduces the HIV reservoir but is implemented in a context outside of a high-risk procedure such as the allo-HSCT.
Different strategies have been tested to enhance immune responses that are capable of killing HIV infected cells. Certain therapeutic vaccination strategies have achieved interesting results in increasing HIV-1 specific immune responses, but have a limited impact on the reduction of HIV reservoirs [21]. Additionally, inhibitory receptors, also called immune checkpoint inhibitors, can exert their influence on T-cell responses, although to date results have been marginal [22]. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy, in contrast, is postulated as the most suitable strategy to enhance T cell responses to levels that can mimic allo-HSCT reactivity. Good model design for CAR-T cells with tropism for cells infected with HIV has been undergoing development for several years. In this review, we compile the main contributions to the field and describe some of the challenges faced in regard to achieving a sterilizing cure with HIV-specific CAR-T cell therapy.

2. Development of the CAR Technology

2.1. Early Studies of CAR-T Cells

The chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell technology was first conceptualized in the 1980s by Eshhar and Gross [23] with the idea of directing T cell responses through genetic editing of T cell receptors (TCRs). The earliest clinical application for this new tool was as a putative therapy for HIV infection in which cytolytic CD8+ T cells (CTLs) were genetically modified to express natural HIV ligand CD4 as an extracellular domain, along with a transmembrane domain and a signal transducing intracellular domain CD3ζ [24]. Thus, on HIV ligand recognition by the CD4 extracellular domain, a CAR-T cell cytotoxic response would be generated against cells expressing HIV antigen gp120. This response would be target-specific and also major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-independent, meaning that HIV’s ability to downregulate surface expression of MHC I to produce immune escape from CTLs would not affect CAR-T cells [23,25,26]. Testing in the early 1990s in in vitro assays showed that CAR-T cells were able to specifically recognize and lyse cells expressing HIV gp120 [26,27]. Based on in vitro promising results, in vivo assays and clinical trials were performed, and although the therapy was shown to be safe and feasible and to present optimal cell survival, there was no control of the infection or of virus relapse (Table 1) [24,28,29].

2.2. New Generations of CARs-T Cells

Several factors could explain the poor effect observed in the early experiments, such as inefficient ex vivo treatment of CD8+ T cells [30]. Regarding CAR design, new alternatives gradually emerged to improve the first generation of CAR-T cells. The second generation of CAR-T cells added intracellular co-stimulatory domains such as CD28 or 4-1BB to the CAR construct. These domains would be linked to the intracellular signal transducing domain CD3ζ, contributing to lymphocyte activation, proliferation, sustained response, and prolonged life of the CAR-T cells [32,33]. While the CD28 costimulatory domain promoted higher cytokine production and better control of virus replication in vitro, CAR-T cells containing 4-1BB costimulatory domain performed better at controlling HIV infection in vivo [34]. Third and fourth generations of CAR-T cells subsequently appeared. Third-generation CARs combined different costimulatory domains to generate a stronger response by augmenting cytokine production and, therefore, their killing ability [35]. Fourth-generation CAR-T cells, or T cells redirected for universal cytokine-mediated killing (TRUCK) included an intracellular interleukin (IL)-12 domain in the corresponding CAR construct, so that CAR expression would be accompanied by the release of transgenic cytokine-like IL-12 upon CAR activation; this would, in turn, enhance activation of T cells and attract other innate immune cells [36]. A fifth generation of CAR-T cells is currently being explored, based on second-generation design. This new proposal adds a truncated domain of IL2Rβ and a STAT3-binding motif to the CD28 and CD3ζ intracellular domains, resulting in enhanced proliferation in vitro and prolonged persistence in vivo [37].

2.3. Translation of the CAR-T Cell Technology to the Clinic

Clinical trials using second-generation CAR-T cells obtained better results than the earlier design. Promising results were presented in the field of cancer, specifically in haematological malignancies, targeting ligands such as CD19, expressed in B cells [38,39,40,41]. This led to approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of tisangenlecleucel (KymriahTM) in August 2017 as the first CAR-T cell therapy, aimed at treating B cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) in paediatric and young adult patients and also diffuse large B cell lymphoma in adult patients [42]. Another example of CAR-T cell therapy is axicabtagene ciloleucel (YescartaTM), approved by the FDA in October 2017; this therapy was also aimed at treating several subtypes of B cell lymphoma with a second-generation CAR designed to target all CD19-expressing cells [42]. FDA approval for KymriahTM and YescartaTM were followed by others, also in the haematological malignancies field, in subsequent years [43].
However, for HIV infection, results in clinical trials testing CAR-T cells were not as promising (Table 1). In 2000, Mitsuyasu and colleagues [28] genetically engineered first-generation CD4-based CAR-T cells that targeted the HIV envelope protein gp120. The treatment consisted of administering a single dose of autologous CD4-based CAR-T cells with or without exogenous IL-12 to 24 people with HIV. It was found, in the treated individuals in comparison with non-treated individuals, that although there was a significant decrease in HIV RNA associated with rectal tissue, no significant mean change in plasma HIV RNA occurred, or blood proviral DNA was detected. Similarly, in a phase-II randomized study, Deeks and colleagues [29] also observed an absence of significant differences in viral reservoirs between study groups following cART with CD4-based CAR-T cells administered to 40 people with HIV. Nevertheless, both studies reported their satisfaction with the safety and feasibility of the therapy. They also concluded that sustained survival of CAR-T cells in circulation was achieved after optimal ex vivo treatment, a finding that was subsequently corroborated elsewhere [24,30].

3. Difficulties and New Strategies to Achieve HIV Cure with CAR-T Cells

CAR-T cell therapies have been applied in many clinical assays for haematological malignancies, with excellent results [44] that demonstrate the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and durable effect of the therapy. Based on these promising outcomes, the HIV field has begun to view CAR-T cell therapy as a potentially promising HIV cure strategy. Unlike other HIV therapeutic approaches, CAR-T cell treatment would be a targeted therapy that would aim to achieve a sterilizing HIV cure, thereby addressing one of the major drawbacks to finding a cure, i.e., completely eliminating the HIV reservoir from the organism [45]. The objective would be for the CAR-T cells to proliferate and engraft to a degree that would ensure a long-lasting therapeutic effect, while avoiding the side effect of graph-versus-host disease (GvHD), given that T cells are autologous. In this way, the therapy would generate immunogenic memory and surveillance directed at fully eliminating HIV-infected cells while avoiding any chance of viral rebound. Although fewer clinical studies have been performed with HIV, the authors are all satisfied that the therapy has been demonstrated to be safe and feasible [28,29], which is a key starting point.
However, the blood cancer and HIV scenarios are very different. Blood malignancies present higher amounts of the targeted antigen with constant regions, and this makes it easier and more accessible for the CAR-T cells to elicit their cytotoxic response. The variability of the gp120 protein and the fact that gp120 expressing cells do not represent the total of HIV infected cells may compromise the efficacy of the CAR-T cells in achieving a putative sterilizing cure. Additionally, the fact that the first CAR-T cells were designed with the CD4 motif raised the possibility that new viral particles could infect the engineered cells. To bypass these three important caveats, different approaches have been developed within the HIV field.

3.1. Avoiding CAR-T Cell Infection

A major disadvantage of CD4-based CAR-T cells is their susceptibility to infection by HIV, given that CD4 is the natural ligand for the gp120 envelope protein of HIV [46,47]. To address this drawback, in place of CD4 as the extracellular antigen recognition domain, broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs) against HIV are engineered in the CAR construct. Approximately 1–2% of HIV-infected individuals generate these antibodies [48], which present a high affinity for the HIV envelope protein. In recent years, many bNAbs have been isolated that target different epitopes of the gp160 protein [49]. Hale and colleagues [50] predicted that the inclusion of single-chain variable fragments (scFvs) of these antibodies as the antigen recognition domain of the CAR construct would generate potent anti-HIV activity in CAR-T cells, and demonstrated that bNAbs are compatible with CAR technology by producing four different bNAb-based CAR-T cells with robust anti-HIV activity in vitro [50]. Overall, in comparison with CD4-based CAR-T cell designs, monoclonal antibody-based CAR demonstrated a higher neutralizing capacity for different HIV-1 strains and showed an ability to avoid HIV infection (Figure 1Ai). Complementarily, Liu and colleagues connected the scFvs of a bNAb (VRC01) to a third-generation CAR moiety. It was demonstrated that these CAR-T cells could effectively eliminate the HIV-reactivated infected CD4+ T lymphocytes, i.e., the quiescent cells from the reservoir harbouring the latent provirus [31]. Several clinical trials are currently ongoing, in which second- and third-generation bNAb-based CAR-T cells are being tested in HIV-infected individuals (Table 1). One recently published clinical trial by Liu and colleagues [31], based on in vitro testing, showed promising results for the safety and effectiveness of bNAb-based CAR-T cell therapy targeting the HIV reservoir in individuals receiving cART. In addition to the safety of the therapy and the long-term in vivo persistence of the CAR-T cells, the clinical trial demonstrated delayed viral rebound when cART was discontinued and also accelerated depletion of the HIV reservoir during cART. However, viral escape from CAR-T cells due to spontaneous mutations generated resistant variants that led to viral rebound [31].
Prevention of CAR-T cell infection is also key to maintaining CAR-T cell persistence and anti-HIV activity in vivo. One approach to avoiding infection of CAR-T cells is by knocking out the CCR5 gene via ex vivo genetic editing using zinc-finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like nucleases (TALENs) or CRISPR-Cas9 technology [34,51]. The CCR5 gene encodes for the main coreceptor for HIV entry and infection, so knockout of this gene in CAR-T cells may help generate permanent resistance to HIV infection. Indeed, it has been demonstrated that individuals with a non-functional allelic variant of this gene (CCR5Δ32) are protected from CCR5-tropic HIV infection [52]. Moreover, the three published cases of cured individuals known to date, i.e., the Berlin, London, and Dusseldorf patients [16,18,53,54], underwent allo-HSCT with cells from donors who were homozygous for the CCR5 deletion (CCR5Δ32/Δ32). In a clinical trial, Tebas and colleagues [55] demonstrated the safety and feasibility of a therapy that attempted to mimic the genetic inherited resistance to HIV in individuals carrying the CCR5Δ32/Δ32 deletion. Autologous CD4+ T cells were treated ex vivo to knock out CCR5 using ZFNs and were then reinfused in individuals that had been on cART. It was demonstrated that the survival rate was higher in the modified CD4+ T cell group than in the unmodified CD4+ T cell group, suggesting that CCR5 knockout confers a selective advantage on CD4+ T cells in HIV-infected individuals [55]. In a more recent clinical trial by the same group, it was observed that the HIV-specific immune response was improved in 14 people with HIV infused with CCR5 gene-edited CD4+ T cells and also that some of the participants controlled the HIV rebound after treatment interruption [56]. The same authors also described a case of viral escape, indicating the potential of HIV-resistant CD4+ T cells to reinvigorate an HIV-specific immune response [56].
In an in vivo assay using nonhuman primates, CD4+ CAR-T cells were genetically modified to knock out the CCR5 gene in order to protect the CAR-T cells from simian HIV (SHIV) infection [57] (Figure 1Aii). One of the main studies tested the feasibility of a therapy combining bNAb-based second-generation CAR-T cells homozygous for the CCR5Δ32 deletion. Used was homology-directed repair (HDR) to specifically insert bNAb-based CAR in the CCR5 locus, thereby disrupting the CCR5 gene while simultaneously introducing the CAR construct (Figure 1Aiii). It was observed that the CCR5-modified bNAb-based CAR-T cells performed better in maintaining control of viral replication than the bNAb-based CAR-T cells without the CCR5Δ32 deletion. Those results support the idea that, in the presence of active HIV replication, CCR5 disruption is critical to avoiding the infection of effector cells, and thus to maintaining anti-HIV activity [50]. A clinical trial is currently ongoing using this strategy of CAR-T cells modified with CCR5 ablation (Table 1).
Overall, because CD4 and CCR5 are HIV primary coreceptors, the use of CD4+ T cells for the CAR technology may enhance the risk of infection of CAR-T cells. However, it has been clearly proven that CCR5Δ32 deletion confers a selective advantage on CD4+ T cells in individuals with HIV [52]. Nonetheless, the use of CD8+ T cells for the CAR-T cell technology might be a better approach, not only because HIV-specific CD8+ T cells play a key role in active control of viremia, but also because CAR-T cell infection will be avoided. Moreover, some studies have shown that HIV-specific CD4+ T cells actively collaborate with HIV-specific CD8+ T cells in enhancing in vivo persistence and survival of the latter. That they do this by upregulating certain cytokines, such as IL-2 or IL-21 [58,59], would suggest that the perfect CAR-T cell therapy would have to be a combination of both cell types to achieve the desired synergistic antiviral effect.

3.2. Reducing Viral Escape

A drawback to the CAR-T cell approach is the immune escape that the viral protein gp120 can render. HIV can spontaneously mutate its envelope protein and produce immune escape from CAR-T cells, thereby favouring rebound of resistant viruses [60,61]. In their clinical trial, Liu and colleagues [31] observed that the rebounded virus strains were resistant to CD8+ CAR-T cell-mediated cytotoxicity, which confirms the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in restricting viral replication and forcing mutations in viruses to generate immune escape. The same authors also noted that viraemia rebounded sooner in trial participants with fewer CD4+ T cells but took longer in trial participants with a higher number of CD4+ T cells. Although no significant data regarding this issue was reported for the clinical trial, the results would suggest that a possible collaboration between CD8+ CAR-T cells and CD4+ T cells might lead to a delay in viral rebound [31]. A possible solution for viral escape is the dual or duoCAR-T cells, which target multiple highly conserved sites in the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein gp160 [62]. Instead of aiming for just one epitope of the HIV envelope protein, CARs are designed to express two or even three gp120/gp41 domains per construct, thereby specifically recognizing and effectively killing HIV infected cells (Figure 1Bi). In comparison with single-site targeting CAR-T cells, immune escape due to HIV genetic diversity is thus delayed or even avoided [62,63]. A recent study showed that multiple-site targeting CAR-T cells consistently demonstrated greater suppressive activity against HIV-1 in vitro and in vivo than single-site targeting CAR-T cells, and also managed to control the HIV reservoir size by eliminating HIV-infected cells as they arose [62]. A clinical phase I/IIa study by the same group is currently recruiting participants to assess the safety and viability of duoCAR-T cell therapy on cART-treated HIV-infected individuals (Table 1). Another similar approach is the convertibleCAR-T cell technology, which also targets multiple gp160 epitopes through a platform where bNAbs can be coupled with a mutated ligand that specifically binds to the CAR (Figure 1Bii) [64]. Initial in vitro results with this technology showed that, within 48 h, convertibleCAR-T cells killed more than half of the inducible reservoir found in blood, what makes it a promising tool for attacking the latent HIV reservoir.

3.3. Targeting HIV Infected Cells

As we have previously discussed, a key factor makes CAR-T cell therapies more successful in the blood cancer scenario. Blood malignancies are characterized by uncontrolled multiplication of the target cell, which translates into an enormous amount of antigen, and this makes the cell more easily accessible for the CAR-T cells to elicit a cytotoxic response. In contrast, the fact that the amount of antigen in people with HIV on cART is lower requires a more greatly target-specific approach to CAR-T cell therapy. In a context of suppressive cART therapy, HIV-infected cells are mostly transcriptionally silent, and this translates into minimal amounts of available targets for CAR-T cells.
One approach that could help to activate reservoir cells and enhance target availability is the shock-and-kill strategy, which aims to reactivate the latent provirus through latency reversal agents (LRAs). With the LRAs, latent provirus should become transcriptionally active and cells should therefore express viral antigens in their membranes, facilitating virus elimination by anti-HIV effector cells [65] (Figure 1C). Liu and colleagues [66] reactivated latently infected CD4+ T cells using several LRAs and then cocultured the activated T cells with bNAb-based third-generation-CAR-T cells. They observed a significant decrease in viral RNA in cocultures with CD8+ CAR-T cells; in contrast, cocultures with CD8+ T cells from the same subjects showed a minimal reduction in viral RNA. Moreover, this antiviral activity in cocultures with CD8+ CAR-T cells was maintained over time, suggesting that CD8+ CAR-T cells are capable of recognizing and neutralizing reactivated HIV-infected CD4+ T cells in vitro [66].
Unfortunately, clinical trials deploying the shock-and-kill strategy have concluded that, even after LRA administration, there was a poor cytotoxic anti-HIV response from host CTLs, which led to a failure to fully eliminate reservoir cells due to immune exhaustion [67]. Another factor contributing to the poor cytotoxic anti-HIV response is the fact that some LRAs have been shown to present an inhibitory effect on cytolytic CD8+ T cells [68]. This is linked to the fact that, as suggested by recent studies, HIV reservoir levels in chronically infected individuals are underestimated and may, in fact, be up to 60 times higher than previously estimated [69]. Thus, the non-induced intact proviruses, being replication-competent, would maintain the reservoir viral load and prevent complete elimination and a sterilizing cure, given that the non-induced proviruses may be reactivated later on [69]. These results imply that there is a need for more potent LRAs that could fully induce all latent proviruses so that CAR-T cells can access the entire reservoir formed by the non-induced intact proviruses and exert their kill strategy to fully eliminate the reservoir.
Given that the most important barrier is revealing the latently HIV-infected cells to the immune effector cells so that these can elicit an effective antiviral response, another strategy that has been proposed is to physically expose those cells rather than try to reactivate them. Latently infected cells from the reservoir are mostly resting memory CD4+ T cells, presenting a low proliferation rate, mainly by homeostatic proliferation through IL-7 [70], and found in several anatomical locations such as the lymph nodes, gut-associated lymph tissue (GALT) [53], genital tract [71], and brain [72]. Some of these locations, specifically the brain and the lymph node B cell germinal centres, are sanctuaries, meaning that the cells inside are protected from cART or CTL penetration [73], thereby hindering the complete eradication of the reservoir. Studies of HIV-infected patients that have received allo-HSCT have found traces of HIV-specific T cell responses, despite proviral HIV DNA being undetectable (even to the most sensitive techniques), indicating that infected cells can persist in inaccessible sanctuaries [20,74]. A recent study has proposed a novel strategy aimed at using the CAR-T cell technology to access these sanctuaries and force exposure of the latent HIV-infected cells to the effector anti-HIV cells. Peterson and colleagues [75] designed CAR-T cells targeting CD20+ expressing cells with the idea of disrupting lymph node B cell germinal centres and exposing latently infected T cells in sanctuaries to effector CTLs, thus enhancing the cytotoxic response. They observed that, although the antiCD20-CAR-T cells effectively travelled to and disrupted the B cell germinal centres, there was no overall significant response regarding reduction of viral DNA or RNA in the analysed tissues. Another study attempted to eliminate the HIV reservoir in follicular dendritic cells (FDCs) using an HIV-specific CAR construct that targeted the HIV envelope protein by enabling expression of CD4 domains 1 and 2 and expression of the carbohydrate recognition domain of mannose-binding lectin (MBL) [76]. Although their CAR-T cells proved to specifically recognize and lyse CD4+ T cells expressing the HIV glycoprotein, they did not specifically lyse HIV-infected FDCs, and overall, their CAR-T cell therapy design was unable to reduce the FDC reservoir [76]. Hence, it is important to both ensure efficient transport of the CAR-T cells to the tissue sanctuaries and to maintain their potent antiviral effect once the effector cells make contact with the reservoir.

4. Conclusions

CAR-T cell therapy is a well-established technology that is having a crucial impact in the field of blood cancer. A similar approach is being explored in the field of HIV, with some promising results in clinical trials using new generations of CAR-T cells and combining different strategies, including shock-and-kill. However, a number of important obstacles still need to be addressed, namely, avoiding CAR-T cell infection from the virus, reducing viral escape, and achieving complete elimination of HIV reservoirs that are transcriptionally silent. New studies are generating promising and original approaches, including the duoCAR strategy, with encouraging results, and it may be that a combination of new approaches will be crucial to overcoming the above-mentioned obstacles. Although the number of clinical trials testing CAR-T cells for HIV are still few, they have all demonstrated that the therapy is safe and feasible, which is a key starting point for finding a cure for HIV.

Author Contributions

G.C.-G. and M.S. conceived, drafted and designed the review. T.V.-H. and J.M.-P. critically reviewed the manuscript and contributed important intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

G.C.-G. is supported by a PhD fellowship (PRE2021-100501) from the Plan Estatal de I + D + I, Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, España. M.S. is supported by a grant by the Miguel Servet Fellowship Programme (CP22/00038) and I + D + I RTI-A Grant (PID2020-115931RA-I00) from the Ministry of Science and Innovation. Research in the J.M.-P. laboratory is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (grants PID2019-109870RB-I00 and CB21/13/00063, Spain), NIH/NIAID (1 UM1 AI164561-01, United States of America), EU HORIZON-HLTH-2021-DISEASE-04-07 (grants 101057100 and 101095606, European Union), Fundació La Marató de TV3 (grant 202130-30-31-32, Spain), and Generalitat de Valencia (grant PROMETEO/2021/036, Spain). T.V.-H. is supported by an investigator fellowship from the AECC (INVES223069VELA).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Figure 1 was created with BioRender.com.

Conflicts of Interest

J.M-P. has received institutional grants and educational/consultancy fees from AbiVax, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Grifols, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and ViiV Healthcare, all outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Staszewski, S.; Miller, V.; Rehmet, S.; Stark, T.; De Crée, J.; De Brabander, M.; Peeters, M.; Andries, K.; Moeremans, M.; De Raeymaeker, M.; et al. Virological and Immunological Analysis of a Triple Combination Pilot Study with Loviride, Lamivudine and Zidovudine in HIV-1-Infected Patients. AIDS 1996, 10, F1–F7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chun, T.W.; Finzi, D.; Margolick, J.; Chadwick, K.; Schwartz, D.; Siliciano, R.F. In Vivo Fate of HIV-1-Infected T Cells: Quantitative Analysis of the Transition to Stable Latency. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 1284–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Finzi, D.; Blankson, J.; Siliciano, J.D.; Margolick, J.B.; Chadwick, K.; Pierson, T.; Smith, K.; Lisziewicz, J.; Lori, F.; Flexner, C.; et al. Latent Infection of CD4+ T Cells Provides a Mechanism for Lifelong Persistence of HIV-1, Even in Patients on Effective Combination Therapy. Nat. Med. 1999, 5, 512–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Buzon, M.J.; Martin-Gayo, E.; Pereyra, F.; Ouyang, Z.; Sun, H.; Li, J.Z.; Piovoso, M.; Shaw, A.; Dalmau, J.; Zangger, N.; et al. Long-Term Antiretroviral Treatment Initiated at Primary HIV-1 Infection Affects the Size, Composition, and Decay Kinetics of the Reservoir of HIV-1-Infected CD4 T Cells. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 10056–10065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Izopet, J.; Salama, G.; Pasquier, C.; Sandres, K.; Marchou, B.; Massip, P.; Puel, J. Decay of HIV-1 DNA in Patients Receiving Suppressive Antiretroviral Therapy. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 1998, 19, 478–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Parisi, S.G.; Andreis, S.; Mengoli, C.; Scaggiante, R.; Ferretto, R.; Manfrin, V.; Cruciani, M.; Giobbia, M.; Boldrin, C.; Basso, M.; et al. Baseline Cellular HIV DNA Load Predicts HIV DNA Decline and Residual HIV Plasma Levels during Effective Antiretroviral Therapy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Ananworanich, J.; Chomont, N.; Eller, L.A.; Kroon, E.; Tovanabutra, S.; Bose, M.; Nau, M.; Fletcher, J.L.K.; Tipsuk, S.; Vandergeeten, C.; et al. HIV DNA Set Point Is Rapidly Established in Acute HIV Infection and Dramatically Reduced by Early ART. EBioMedicine 2016, 11, 68–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Casado, C.; Galvez, C.; Pernas, M.; Tarancon-Diez, L.; Rodriguez, C.; Sanchez-Merino, V.; Vera, M.; Olivares, I.; De Pablo-Bernal, R.; Merino-Mansilla, A.; et al. Permanent Control of HIV-1 Pathogenesis in Exceptional Elite Controllers: A Model of Spontaneous Cure. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Mendoza, D.; Johnson, S.A.; Peterson, B.A.; Natarajan, V.; Salgado, M.; Dewar, R.L.; Burbelo, P.D.; Doria-Rose, N.A.; Graf, E.H.; Greenwald, J.H.; et al. Comprehensive Analysis of Unique Cases with Extraordinary Control over HIV Replication. Blood 2012, 119, 4645–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bailey, J.R.; Brennan, T.P.; O’Connell, K.A.; Siliciano, R.F.; Blankson, J.N. Evidence of CD8+ T-Cell-Mediated Selective Pressure on Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Nef in HLA-B*57+ Elite Suppressors. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Pereyra, F.; Palmer, S.; Miura, T.; Block, B.L.; Wiegand, A.; Rothchild, A.C.; Baker, B.; Rosenberg, R.; Cutrell, E.; Seaman, M.S.; et al. Persistent Low-Level Viremia in HIV-1 Elite Controllers and Relationship to Immunologic Parameters. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 200, 984–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Sáez-Cirión, A.; Bacchus, C.; Hocqueloux, L.; Avettand-Fenoel, V.; Girault, I.; Lecuroux, C.; Potard, V.; Versmisse, P.; Melard, A.; Prazuck, T.; et al. Post-Treatment HIV-1 Controllers with a Long-Term Virological Remission after the Interruption of Early Initiated Antiretroviral Therapy ANRS VISCONTI Study. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gálvez, C.; Urrea, V.; Dalmau, J.; Jimenez, M.; Clotet, B.; Monceaux, V.; Huot, N.; Leal, L.; González-Soler, V.; González-Cao, M.; et al. Extremely Low Viral Reservoir in Treated Chronically HIV-1-Infected Individuals. EBioMedicine 2020, 57, 102830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gálvez, C.; Urrea, V.; Garcia-Guerrero, M.D.C.; Bernal, S.; Benet, S.; Mothe, B.; Bailón, L.; Dalmau, J.; Martinez, A.; Nieto, A.; et al. Altered T-Cell Subset Distribution in the Viral Reservoir in HIV-1-Infected Individuals with Extremely Low Proviral DNA (LoViReTs). J. Intern. Med. 2022, 292, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yukl, S.A.; Shergill, A.K.; Ho, T.; Killian, M.; Girling, V.; Epling, L.; Li, P.; Wong, L.K.; Crouch, P.; Deeks, S.G.; et al. The Distribution of HIV DNA and RNA in Cell Subsets Differs in Gut and Blood of HIV-Positive Patients on ART: Implications for Viral Persistence. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1212–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Gupta, R.K.; Abdul-Jawad, S.; McCoy, L.E.; Mok, H.P.; Peppa, D.; Salgado, M.; Martinez-Picado, J.; Nijhuis, M.; Wensing, A.M.J.; Lee, H.; et al. HIV-1 Remission Following CCR5Δ32/Δ32 Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Nature 2019, 568, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jensen, B.; Knops, E.; Lübke, N.; Wensing, A.M.; Martinez-Picado, J.; Kaiser, R.; Nijhuis, M.; Salgado, M.; Harrer, T.; Heger, E.; et al. Analytic Treatment Interruption (ATI) after Allogeneic CCR5-D32 HSCT in 2013. In Proceedings of the CROI, Seattle, WA, USA, 4–7 March 2019. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hütter, G.; Nowak, D.; Mossner, M.; Ganepola, S.; Müßig, A.; Allers, K.; Schneider, T.; Hofmann, J.; Kücherer, C.; Blau, O.; et al. Long-Term Control of HIV by CCR5 Delta32/Delta32 Stem-Cell Transplantation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 692–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Henrich, T.J.; Hanhauser, E.; Marty, F.M.; Sirignano, M.N.; Keating, S.; Lee, T.H.; Robles, Y.P.; Davis, B.T.; Li, J.Z.; Heisey, A.; et al. Antiretroviral-Free HIV-1 Remission and Viral Rebound after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation: Report of 2 Cases. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014, 161, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Salgado, M.; Kwon, M.; Gálvez, C.; Badiola, J.; Nijhuis, M.; Bandera, A.; Balsalobre, P.; Miralles, P.; Buño, I.; Martinez-Laperche, C.; et al. Mechanisms That Contribute to a Profound Reduction of the HIV-1 Reservoir after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant. Ann. Intern. Med. 2018, 169, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Bailón, L.; Llano, A.; Cedeño, S.; Escribà, T.; Rosás-Umbert, M.; Parera, M.; Casadellà, M.; Lopez, M.; Pérez, F.; Oriol-Tordera, B.; et al. Safety, Immunogenicity and Effect on Viral Rebound of HTI Vaccines in Early Treated HIV-1 Infection: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase 1 Trial. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2611–2621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blanch-Lombarte, O.; Gálvez, C.; Revollo, B.; Jiménez-Moyano, E.; Llibre, J.M.; Manzano, J.L.; Boada, A.; Dalmau, J.; Speiser, D.E.; Clotet, B.; et al. Enhancement of Antiviral CD8+ T-Cell Responses and Complete Remission of Metastatic Melanoma in an HIV-1-Infected Subject Treated with Pembrolizumab. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Gross, G.; Waks, T.; Eshhar, Z. Expression of Immunoglobulin-T-Cell Receptor Chimeric Molecules as Functional Receptors with Antibody-Type Specificity (Chimeric Genes/Antibody Variable Region). Immunology. 1989, 86, 10024–10028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Walker, R.E.; Bechtel, C.M.; Natarajan, V. Long-Term in Vivo Survival of Receptor-Modified Syngeneic T Cells in Patients with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection. Blood 2000, 96, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  25. Masiero, S.; Del Vecchio, C.; Gavioli, R.; Mattiuzzo, G.; Cusi, M.G.; Micheli, L.; Gennari, F.; Siccardi, A.; Marasco, W.A.; Palù, G.; et al. T-Cell Engineering by a Chimeric T-Cell Receptor with Antibody-Type Specificity for the HIV-1 Gp120. Gene Ther. 2005, 12, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Roberts, M.R.; Qin, L.; Zhang, D. Targeting of Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Cells by CDS+ T Lymphocytes Armed With Universal T-Cell Receptors. Blood 1994, 84, 2878–2889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Yang, O.O.; Tran, A.-C.; Kalams, S.A.; Johnson, R.P.; Roberts, M.R.; Walker, B.D. Lysis of HIV-1-Infected Cells and Inhibition of Viral Replication by Universal Receptor T Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11478–11483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Mitsuyasu, R.T.; Anton, P.A.; Deeks, S.G.; Scadden, D.T.; Connick, E.; Downs, M.T.; Bakker, A.; Roberts, M.R.; June, C.H.; Jalali, S.; et al. Prolonged Survival and Tissue Trafficking Following Adoptive Transfer of CD4ζ Gene-Modified Autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells in Human Immunodeficiency Virus–Infected Subjects. Blood 2000, 96, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Deeks, S.G.; Wagner, B.; Anton, P.A.; Mitsuyasu, R.T.; Scadden, D.T.; Huang, C.; Macken, C.; Richman, D.D.; Christopherson, C.; June, C.H.; et al. A Phase II Randomized Study of HIV-Specific T-Cell Gene Therapy in Subjects with Undetectable Plasma Viremia on Combination Antiretroviral Therapy. Mol. Ther. 2002, 5, 788–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Scholler, J.; Brady, T.L.; Binder-Scholl, G.; Hwang, W.-T.; Plesa, G.; Hege, K.M.; Vogel, A.N.; Kalos, M.; Riley, J.L.; Deeks, S.G.; et al. Decade-Long Safety and Function of Retroviral-Modified Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells HHS Public Access. Sci. Transl. Med. 2012, 4, 132–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Liu, B.; Zhang, W.; Xia, B.; Jing, S.; Du, Y.; Zou, F.; Li, R.; Lu, L.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; et al. Broadly Neutralizing Antibody-Derived CAR T Cells Reduce Viral Reservoir in Individuals Infected with HIV-1. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e150211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Finney, H.M.; Lawson, A.D.; Bebbington, C.R. Chimeric Receptors Providing Both Primary and Costimulatory Signaling in T Cells from a Single Gene Product. J. Immunol. 1998, 161, 2791–2797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lawson, H.M.; Finney, A.N.; Akbar, A.D.G. Chain ζ CD137 in Series with Signals from the TCR CD28, Inducible Costimulator, CD134, and from with Chimeric Receptors: Costimulation Activation of Resting Human Primary T Cells. J. Immunol. Ref. 2022, 172, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Seif, M.; Einsele, H.; Löffler, J. CAR T Cells Beyond Cancer: Hope for Immunomodulatory Therapy of Infectious Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Savoldo, B.; Ramos, C.A.; Liu, E.; Mims, M.P.; Keating, M.J.; Carrum, G.; Kamble, R.T.; Bollard, C.M.; Gee, A.P.; Mei, Z.; et al. CD28 Costimulation Improves Expansion and Persistence of Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells in Lymphoma Patients. J. Clin. Investig. 2011, 121, 1822–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Chmielewski, M.; Hombach, A.A.; Abken, H. Of CARs and TRUCKs: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T Cells Engineered with an Inducible Cytokine to Modulate the Tumor Stroma. Immunol. Rev. 2014, 257, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kagoya, Y.; Tanaka, S.; Guo, T.; Anczurowski, M.; Wang, C.H.; Saso, K.; Butler, M.O.; Minden, M.D.; Hirano, N. A Novel Chimeric Antigen Receptor Containing a JAK-STAT Signaling Domain Mediates Superior Antitumor Effects. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 352–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Maude, S.L.; Frey, N.; Shaw, P.A.; Aplenc, R.; Barrett, D.M.; Bunin, N.J.; Chew, A.; Gonzalez, V.E.; Zheng, Z.; Lacey, S.F.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells for Sustained Remissions in Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 371, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Grupp, S.A.; Kalos, M.; Barrett, D.; Aplenc, R.; Porter, D.L.; Rheingold, S.R.; Teachey, D.T.; Chew, A.; Hauck, B.; Wright, J.F.; et al. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Modified T Cells for Acute Lymphoid Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1509–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Brentjens, R.J.; Davila, M.L.; Riviere, I.; Park, J.; Wang, X.; Cowell, L.G.; Bartido, S.; Stefanski, J.; Taylor, C.; Olszewska, M.; et al. CD19-Targeted T Cells Rapidly Induce Molecular Remissions in Adults with Chemotherapy-Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Kochenderfer, J.N.; Dudley, M.E.; Feldman, S.A.; Wilson, W.H.; Spaner, D.E.; Maric, I.; Stetler-Stevenson, M.; Phan, G.Q.; Hughes, M.S.; Sherry, R.M.; et al. B-Cell Depletion and Remissions of Malignancy along with Cytokine-Associated Toxicity in a Clinical Trial of Anti-CD19 Chimeric-Antigen-Receptor-Transduced T Cells. Blood 2012, 119, 2709–2720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Papadouli, I.; Mueller-Berghaus, J.; Beuneu, C.; Ali, S.; Hofner, B.; Petavy, F.; Tzogani, K.; Miermont, A.; Norga, K.; Kholmanskikh, O.; et al. EMA Review of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Yescarta) for the Treatment of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. Oncologist 2020, 25, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alnefaie, A.; Albogami, S.; Asiri, Y.; Ahmad, T.; Alotaibi, S.S.; Al-Sanea, M.M.; Althobaiti, H. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cells: An Overview of Concepts, Applications, Limitations, and Proposed Solutions. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 797440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Gill, S.; Maus, M.V.; Porter, D.L. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: 25years in the Making. Blood Rev. 2016, 30, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Finzi, D.; Hermankova, M.; Pierson, T.; Carruth, L.M.; Buck, C.; Chaisson, R.E.; Quinn, T.C.; Chadwick, K.; Margolick, J.; Brookmeyer, R.; et al. Identification of a Reservoir for HIV-1 in Patients on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy. Science 1997, 278, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bitton, N.; Verrier, F.; Debré, P.; Gorochov, G. Characterization of T Cell-Expressed Chimeric Receptors with Antibody-Type Specificity for the CD4 Binding Site of HIV-1 Gp120. Eur. J. Immunol. 1998, 28, 4177–4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhen, A.; Kamata, M.; Rezek, V.; Rick, J.; Levin, B.; Kasparian, S.; Chen, I.S.; Yang, O.O.; Zack, J.A.; Kitchen, S.G. HIV-Specific Immunity Derived From Chimeric Antigen Receptor-Engineered Stem Cells. Mol. Ther. 2015, 23, 1358–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. York, J.; Gowrishankar, K.; Micklethwaite, K.; Palmer, S.; Cunningham, A.L.; Nasr, N. Evolving Strategies to Eliminate the CD4 T Cells HIV Viral Reservoir via CAR T Cell Immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 873301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kwong, P.D.; Mascola, J.R.; Nabel, G.J. Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies and the Search for an HIV-1 Vaccine: The End of the Beginning. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2013, 13, 693–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Hale, M.; Mesojednik, T.; Romano Ibarra, G.S.; Sahni, J.; Bernard, A.; Sommer, K.; Scharenberg, A.M.; Rawlings, D.J.; Wagner, T.A. Engineering HIV-Resistant, Anti-HIV Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells. Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Rothemejer, F.H.; Lauritsen, N.P.; Juhl, A.K.; Schleimann, M.H.; König, S.; Søgaard, O.S.; Bak, R.O.; Tolstrup, M. Development of HIV-Resistant CAR T Cells by CRISPR/Cas-Mediated CAR Integration into the CCR5 Locus. Viruses 2023, 15, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, Y.; Paxton, W.A.; Wolinsky, S.M.; Neumann, A.U.; Zhang, L.; He, T.; Kang, S.; Ceradini, D.; Jin, Z.; Yazdanbakhsh, K.; et al. The Role of a Mutant CCR5 Allele in HIV–1 Transmission and Disease Progression. Nat. Med. 1996, 2, 1240–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Yukl, S.A.; Boritz, E.; Busch, M.; Bentsen, C.; Chun, T.W.; Douek, D.; Eisele, E.; Haase, A.; Ho, Y.C.; Hütter, G.; et al. Challenges in Detecting HIV Persistence during Potentially Curative Interventions: A Study of the Berlin Patient. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jensen, B.-E.O.; Knops, E.; Cords, L.; Lübke, N.; Salgado, M.; Busman-Sahay, K.; Estes, J.D.; Huyveneers, L.E.P.; Perdomo-Celis, F.; Wittner, M.; et al. In-Depth Virological and Immunological Characterization of HIV-1 Cure after CCR5Δ32/Δ32 Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Nat. Med. 2023, accepted. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tebas, P.; Stein, D.; Tang, W.W.; Frank, I.; Wang, S.Q.; Lee, G.; Spratt, S.K.; Surosky, R.T.; Giedlin, M.A.; Nichol, G.; et al. Gene Editing of CCR5 in Autologous CD4 T Cells of Persons Infected with HIV. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 901–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Tebas, P.; Jadlowsky, J.K.; Shaw, P.A.; Tian, L.; Esparza, E.; Brennan, A.L.; Kim, S.; Naing, S.Y.; Richardson, M.W.; Vogel, A.N.; et al. CCR5-Edited CD4+ T Cells Augment HIV-Specific Immunity to Enable Post-Rebound Control of HIV Replication. J. Clin. Investig. 2021, 131, e144486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rust, B.J.; Kean, L.S.; Colonna, L.; Brandenstein, K.E.; Poole, N.H.; Obenza, W.; Enstrom, M.R.; Maldini, C.R.; Ellis, G.I.; Fennessey, C.M.; et al. Robust Expansion of HIV CAR T Cells Following Antigen Boosting in ART-Suppressed Nonhuman Primates. Blood 2020, 15, 1722–1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lichterfeld, M.; Kaufmann, D.E.; Yu, X.G.; Mui, S.K.; Addo, M.M.; Johnston, M.N.; Cohen, D.; Robbins, G.K.; Pae, E.; Alter, G.; et al. Loss of HIV-1-Specific CD8+ T Cell Proliferation after Acute HIV-1 Infection and Restoration by Vaccine-Induced HIV-1-Specific CD4+ T Cells. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 200, 701–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Maldini, C.R.; Gayout, K.; Leibman, R.S.; Dopkin, D.L.; Mills, J.P.; Shan, X.; Glover, J.A.; Riley, J.L. HIV-Resistant and HIV-Specific CAR-Modified CD4+ T Cells Mitigate HIV Disease Progression and Confer CD4+ T Cell Help In Vivo. Mol. Ther. 2020, 28, 1585–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Lynch, R.M.; Boritz, E.; Coates, E.E.; DeZure, A.; Madden, P.; Costner, P.; Enama, M.E.; Plummer, S.; Holman, L.; Hendel, C.S.; et al. Virologic Effects of Broadly Neutralizing Antibody VRC01 Administration during Chronic HIV-1 Infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 319ra206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Riley, J.L.; Montaner, L.J. Cell-Mediated Immunity to Target the Persistent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Reservoir. J. Infect. Dis. 2017, 215, S160–S171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Anthony-Gonda, K.; Bardhi, A.; Ray, A.; Flerin, N.; Li, M.; Chen, W.; Ochsenbauer, C.; Kappes, J.C.; Krueger, W.; Worden, A.; et al. Multispecific Anti-HIV DuoCAR-T Cells Display Broad in Vitro Antiviral Activity and Potent in Vivo Elimination of HIV-Infected Cells in a Humanized Mouse Model. Sci. Transl. Med. 2019, 11, eaav5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anthony-Gonda, K.; Ray, A.; Su, H.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, Y.; Lee, D.; Block, A.; Chilunda, V.; Weiselberg, J.; Zemelko, L.; et al. In Vivo Killing of Primary HIV-Infected Cells by Peripheral-Injected Early Memory–Enriched Anti-HIV DuoCAR T Cells. JCI Insight 2022, 7, e161698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Herzig, E.; Kim, K.C.; Packard, T.A.; Vardi, N.; Schwarzer, R.; Gramatica, A.; Deeks, S.G.; Williams, S.R.; Landgraf, K.; Killeen, N.; et al. Attacking Latent HIV with ConvertibleCAR-T Cells, a Highly Adaptable Killing Platform. Cell 2019, 179, 880–894.e10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bashiri, K.; Rezaei, N.; Nasi, M.; Cossarizza, A. The Role of Latency Reversal Agents in the Cure of HIV: A Review of Current Data. Immunol. Lett. 2018, 196, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, B.; Zou, F.; Lu, L.; Chen, C.; He, D.; Zhang, X.; Tang, X.; Liu, C.; Li, L.; Zhang, H. Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Guided by the Single-Chain Fv of a Broadly Neutralizing Antibody Specifically and Effectively Eradicate Virus Reactivated from Latency in CD4+ T Lymphocytes Isolated from HIV-1-Infected Individuals Receiving Suppressive C. J. Virol. 2016, 90, 9712–9724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Rasmussen, T.A.; Tolstrup, M.; Søgaard, O.S. Reversal of Latency as Part of a Cure for HIV-1. Trends Microbiol. 2016, 24, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Walker-Sperling, V.E.; Pohlmeyer, C.W.; Tarwater, P.M.; Blankson, J.N. The Effect of Latency Reversal Agents on Primary CD8 + T Cells: Implications for Shock and Kill Strategies for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Eradication. EBioMedicine 2016, 8, 217–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Ho, Y.C.; Shan, L.; Hosmane, N.N.; Wang, J.; Laskey, S.B.; Rosenbloom, D.I.S.; Lai, J.; Blankson, J.N.; Siliciano, J.D.; Siliciano, R.F. Replication-Competent Non-Induced Proviruses in the Latent Reservoir Increase Barrier to HIV-1 Cure. Cell 2013, 155, 540–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Chomont, N.; El-Far, M.; Ancuta, P.; Trautmann, L.; Procopio, F.A.; Yassine-Diab, B.; Boucher, G.; Boulassel, M.R.; Ghattas, G.; Brenchley, J.M.; et al. HIV Reservoir Size and Persistence Are Driven by T Cell Survival and Homeostatic Proliferation. Nat. Med. 2009, 15, 893–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Cantero-Pérez, J.; Grau-Expósito, J.; Serra-Peinado, C.; Rosero, D.A.; Luque-Ballesteros, L.; Astorga-Gamaza, A.; Castellví, J.; Sanhueza, T.; Tapia, G.; Lloveras, B.; et al. Resident Memory T Cells Are a Cellular Reservoir for HIV in the Cervical Mucosa. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Wallet, C.; De Rovere, M.; Van Assche, J.; Daouad, F.; De Wit, S.; Gautier, V.; Mallon, P.W.G.; Marcello, A.; Van Lint, C.; Rohr, O.; et al. Microglial Cells: The Main HIV-1 Reservoir in the Brain. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Ahlenstiel, C.L.; Symonds, G.; Kent, S.J.; Kelleher, A.D. Block and Lock HIV Cure Strategies to Control the Latent Reservoir. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Eberhard, J.M.; Angin, M.; Passaes, C.; Salgado, M.; Monceaux, V.; Knops, E.; Kobbe, G.; Jensen, B.; Christopeit, M.; Kröger, N.; et al. Vulnerability to Reservoir Reseeding Due to High Immune Activation after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Individuals with HIV-1. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020, 12, 542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Peterson, C.W. SHIV Reservoirs Persist Following CAR T Cell-Mediated Depletion of B Cell Follicles in Nonhuman Primates. In Proceedings of the AIDS 2022, Montreal, QC, Canada, 29 July–2 August 2022. [Google Scholar]
  76. Ollerton, M.T.; Berger, E.A.; Connick, E.; Burton, G.F. HIV-1-Specific Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cells Fail To Recognize and Eliminate the Follicular Dendritic Cell HIV Reservoir In Vitro. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e00190-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Viruses 15 00789 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main limitations of CAR-T cells as a therapy for HIV and new approaches to overcome the limitations. (A) CD4-CAR-T cells can be infected by HIV-1 through interaction with CD4 and CCR5 receptors present in the CAR. Alternative approaches proposed: (i) use of bNAbs to build the CAR; (ii) deletion of the CCR5 gene through gene editing techniques to prevent infection; or (iii) both approaches combined. (B) The high mutation rate of HIV-1 can generate HIV-1 strains resistant to the CAR-T cell cytotoxic effect. Some of the new CAR-T cell designs: (i) duoCAR-T cells, which are able to target more than one gp160 epitope, and (ii) convertibleCAR-T built with a common binding site for a variety of gp160-specific bNAbs that can mitigate viral escape. (C) Latently infected cells from reservoirs are not accessible to CAR-T cells, but shock-and-kill approaches such as using LRAs can transcriptionally reactivate these cells making them accessible targets for CAR-T cells.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the main limitations of CAR-T cells as a therapy for HIV and new approaches to overcome the limitations. (A) CD4-CAR-T cells can be infected by HIV-1 through interaction with CD4 and CCR5 receptors present in the CAR. Alternative approaches proposed: (i) use of bNAbs to build the CAR; (ii) deletion of the CCR5 gene through gene editing techniques to prevent infection; or (iii) both approaches combined. (B) The high mutation rate of HIV-1 can generate HIV-1 strains resistant to the CAR-T cell cytotoxic effect. Some of the new CAR-T cell designs: (i) duoCAR-T cells, which are able to target more than one gp160 epitope, and (ii) convertibleCAR-T built with a common binding site for a variety of gp160-specific bNAbs that can mitigate viral escape. (C) Latently infected cells from reservoirs are not accessible to CAR-T cells, but shock-and-kill approaches such as using LRAs can transcriptionally reactivate these cells making them accessible targets for CAR-T cells.
Viruses 15 00789 g001
Table
Table 1. Overview of CAR-T cell clinical trials in HIV field.
Table 1. Overview of CAR-T cell clinical trials in HIV field.
Trial
Registration		Study TitleStart DatePhaseCountryCAR
Generation		Type of CAROutcomeReference
-Prolonged survival and tissue trafficking following adoptive transfer of CD4ζ gene-modified autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in human immunodeficiency virus–infected subjects1999 *Phase IIUSAFirstCD4ζ-basedValidation of the feasibility and antiviral activityMitsuyasu et al. Blood 2000. [28]
-Long-term in vivo survival of receptor-modified syngeneic T cells in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection1999 *Phase IUSAFirstCD4ζ-basedProve that administration is safeWalker et al. Blood 2000. [24]
-A phase II randomized study of HIV-specific T-cell gene therapy in subjects with undetectable plasma viremia on combination antiretroviral therapy2002 *Phase II RandomizedUSAFirstCD4ζ-basedConfirmed safety and feasibility, but no effect on HIV reservoirsDeeks et al. Mol. Ther. 2002. [29]
NCT01013415A phase I/II study of the safety, survival, and trafficking of autologous CD4-ζ gene-modified T cells with and without extension Interleukin-2 in HIV infected patients2001Phase I Non-RandomizedUSAFirstCD4ζ-basedSafety and long term persistence of modified T cellsScholler et al. Sci. Trasl. Med. 2012. [30]
NCT03240328The effect of CAR-T cell therapy on the reconstitution of HIV-specific immune function2017Phase IChinaThirdbNAb-basedLong term in vivo persistence and no safety concernsLiu et al. J. Clin. Invest. 2021. [31]
NCT03617198A pilot study of T cells genetically modified by Zinc Finger Nucleases SB-728mR and CD4 chimeric antigen receptor in HIV-infected subjects2019Phase I RandomizedUSASecondCCR5 ZFN-treated CD4+Ongoing-
NCT04648046Safety and anti-HIV activity of autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding bi-specific anti-gp120 CAR molecules (LVgp120duoCAR-T) in anti-retroviral drug-treated HIV-1 infection2021Phase I/IIa Non-RandomizedUSASecondCD4-based duoCAROngoing-
* Submission date of publication because study start date is not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campos-Gonzalez, G.; Martinez-Picado, J.; Velasco-Hernandez, T.; Salgado, M. Opportunities for CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in HIV Cure. Viruses 2023, 15, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030789

AMA Style

Campos-Gonzalez G, Martinez-Picado J, Velasco-Hernandez T, Salgado M. Opportunities for CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in HIV Cure. Viruses. 2023; 15(3):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campos-Gonzalez, Gerard, Javier Martinez-Picado, Talia Velasco-Hernandez, and Maria Salgado. 2023. "Opportunities for CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in HIV Cure" Viruses 15, no. 3: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030789

APA Style

Campos-Gonzalez, G., Martinez-Picado, J., Velasco-Hernandez, T., & Salgado, M. (2023). Opportunities for CAR-T Cell Immunotherapy in HIV Cure. Viruses, 15(3), 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/v15030789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop