Next Article in Journal
Comparative Atlas of SARS-CoV-2 Substitution Mutations: A Focus on Iranian Strains Amidst Global Trends
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Inflammatory and Thyroid Hormone Levels Based on Hepatitis A and B Virus Immunity Status: Age and Sex Stratification
Previous Article in Special Issue
Development of a Mouse-Adapted Reporter SARS-CoV-2 as a Tool for Two-Photon In Vivo Imaging
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Application of diceCT to Study the Development of the Zika Virus-Infected Mouse Brain

Viruses 2024, 16(8), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081330
by Amy L. Green 1,2, Evangeline C. Cowell 1,2, Laura M. Carr 3, Kim Hemsley 1,2, Emma Sherratt 4, Lyndsey E. Collins-Praino 3 and Jillian M. Carr 1,2,*
Reviewer 2:
Viruses 2024, 16(8), 1330; https://doi.org/10.3390/v16081330
Submission received: 9 July 2024 / Revised: 14 August 2024 / Accepted: 19 August 2024 / Published: 20 August 2024

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

There are minor typographic mistakes that can easily be remedied.

Author Response

Please see attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This is a generally well written manuscript describing application of an interesting and useful imaging technique to an important viral disease using neonatal mice.  I do not have substantive criticisms or suggestions other than to edit the first sentence of the introduction:

Capitalize Flavivirus

Change "where ..." to something like "responsible for clinically significaant outbreaks that culminated in .."

Comments on the Quality of English Language

English is fine 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

My original comments and suggestions have been adequately addressed in this revision, except for one point. I suggested to convert the unit of volume from um3 to mm3. Indeed, I see that the authors changed the units. However, the conversion factor they used is incorrect. 1x108 uum3 = 0.1 mm3; so I don't understand why the values in Fig. 2C, Fig. 3, and Table 3 are way off... For context, 1,000 mm3 = 1 ml, so if you're showing brain volumes that are 104 mm3, it means the 10-day old pup has a brain volume of 10 ml, which is not possible. Please confirm that the values reported in the manuscript have been converted and reported correctly.

Comments on the Quality of English Language

looks OK

Author Response

Comment 1: 

My original comments and suggestions have been adequately addressed in this revision, except for one point. I suggested to convert the unit of volume from um3 to mm3. Indeed, I see that the authors changed the units. However, the conversion factor they used is incorrect. 1x108 uum3 = 0.1 mm3; so I don't understand why the values in Fig. 2C, Fig. 3, and Table 3 are way off... For context, 1,000 mm3 = 1 ml, so if you're showing brain volumes that are 104 mm3, it means the 10-day old pup has a brain volume of 10 ml, which is not possible. Please confirm that the values reported in the manuscript have been converted and reported correctly.

Rebuttal: We apologise, this was incorrectly calculated and has been amended and correct scales presented in Figure 2 and 3.

Back to TopTop