Next Article in Journal
Socio-Economic Status and Language Development in Hearing Loss: A Critical Appraisal
Next Article in Special Issue
Self-Reported Hearing-Aid Use Patterns in an Adult Danish Population
Previous Article in Journal
Vestibular Loss in Children Affected by LVAS and IP2 Malformation and Operated with Cochlear Implant
Previous Article in Special Issue
Do Patients Aged 85 Years and above Benefit from Their Cochlear Implants?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners †

Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Portions of the data were presented at the 181st meeting of the Acoustical Society of America.
Audiol. Res. 2023, 13(1), 143-150; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010014
Submission received: 29 November 2022 / Revised: 20 January 2023 / Accepted: 7 February 2023 / Published: 10 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rehabilitation of Hearing Impairment)

Abstract

The Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) are two most commonly used questionnaires in the audiology clinic to assess an individual’s self-perception of their hearing ability. Here, we present the outcomes of these two questionnaires on a large group of self-reported normal hearing adult listeners. A total of 254 self-reported normal-hearing younger and older adults completed the SSQ and the APHAB questionnaire. The younger participants completed the questionnaires through Qualtrics, whereas the older participants completed the questionnaire through Qualtrics and a traditional pen-and-paper method. The younger listeners perceived a higher ability compared to the older adults in all the SSQ subscales (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities) and reported a lesser frequency of the problems in three of the four APHAB subscales (Ease of communication, Reverberation, and Background Noise). There was no significant difference in the frequency of the problems reported in the Aversiveness subscale. Self-reported normal-hearing listeners do not rate their listening ability at the top of the ability scale. Additionally, the large dataset presented here has a potential normative value for the SSQ and the APHAB questionnaires for self-reported normal-hearing adult listeners.
Keywords: SSQ; APHAB; aging; self-reported normal hearing SSQ; APHAB; aging; self-reported normal hearing

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Srinivasan, N.; O’Neill, S. Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners. Audiol. Res. 2023, 13, 143-150. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010014

AMA Style

Srinivasan N, O’Neill S. Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners. Audiology Research. 2023; 13(1):143-150. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Srinivasan, Nirmal, and Sadie O’Neill. 2023. "Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners" Audiology Research 13, no. 1: 143-150. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010014

APA Style

Srinivasan, N., & O’Neill, S. (2023). Comparison of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) Questionnaires in a Large Cohort of Self-Reported Normal-Hearing Adult Listeners. Audiology Research, 13(1), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres13010014

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop