Next Article in Journal
Nystagmus in Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct: A Case Series
Previous Article in Journal
Outlook for Tissue Engineering of the Tympanic Membrane
 
 
Audiology Research is published by MDPI from Volume 10 Issue 2 (2020). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with PAGEPress.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited

Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and University of Arkansas at Little Rock, AR, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Audiol. Res. 2015, 5(1), 105; https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.105
Submission received: 12 March 2014 / Revised: 3 December 2014 / Accepted: 21 January 2015 / Published: 3 March 2015

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to revisit the two-channel, simultaneous click-evoked extratympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem response (ECoG/ABR) recording technique for clinical use in normal hearing participants. Recording the compound action potential (AP) of the ECoG simultaneously with ABR may be useful when Wave I of the ABR is small or diminished in patients with sensorineural or retrocochlear disorder and minimizes overall test time. In contrast to some previous studies that used the extratympanic electrode both as non-inverting electrode for the ECoG and inverting electrode for ABR, this study maintained separate recording channel montages unique to conventional click-evoked ECoG and ABR recordings. That is, the ABR was recorded using a vertical channel (Cz to ipsilateral earlobe), while the ECoG with custom extratympanic electrode was recorded using a horizontal channel (tympanic membrane to contralateral earlobe). The extratympanic electrode is easy to fabricate inhouse, or can be purchased commercially. Maintaining the conventional ABR montage permits continued use of traditional normative data. Broadband clicks at a fixed level of 85 dB nHL were presented with alternating polarity at stimulus rates of 9.3, 11.3, and 15.3/s. Different stimulation rates were explored to identify the most efficient rate without sacrificing time or waveform morphology. Results revealed larger ECoG AP than ABR Wave I, as expected, and no significant difference across stimulation rate and no interaction effect. Extratympanic electrode placement takes little additional clinic time and may improve the neurodiagnostic utility of the ABR.
Keywords: extratympanic; electrocochleography; auditory brainstem response; electrode; simultaneous extratympanic; electrocochleography; auditory brainstem response; electrode; simultaneous

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Minaya, C.; Atcherson, S.R. Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited. Audiol. Res. 2015, 5, 105. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.105

AMA Style

Minaya C, Atcherson SR. Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited. Audiology Research. 2015; 5(1):105. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Minaya, Carlos, and Samuel R. Atcherson. 2015. "Simultaneous Extratympanic Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Responses Revisited" Audiology Research 5, no. 1: 105. https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2015.105

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop