Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Success in Swiss COPD Patients Receiving Dual Bronchodilation Therapy as COPD Maintenance Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge, Attitude and Practice for Pruritus Management in Physicians and Patients with Diabetes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Role of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on Crying Time Reduction in Infantile Colic and Its Impact on Maternal Depression: A Real-Life Clinic-Based Study

Clin. Pract. 2022, 12(1), 37-45; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12010005
by Arun Wadhwa 1, Dhanasekhar Kesavelu 2, Kishore Kumar 3, Pallab Chatterjee 4, Pramod Jog 5, Sarath Gopalan 6, Rudra Paul 4, Krishna Chaitanya Veligandla 7, Suyog Mehta 7, Amey Mane 7, Sucheta Pandit 7, Rahul Rathod 7, Sushma Jayan 8 and Monjori Mitra 9,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Clin. Pract. 2022, 12(1), 37-45; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract12010005
Submission received: 16 November 2021 / Revised: 23 December 2021 / Accepted: 28 December 2021 / Published: 7 January 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript 'Role of Lactobacillus reuteri DSM 17938 on crying time reduction in infantile colic: A real-life clinic-based study' is interesting to readers. Systematic reviews have highlighted this role, and this study showed robust evidence on this topic.
See the recent review published: Dos Reis Buzzo Zermiani AP, et al. Evidence of Lactobacillus reuteri to reduce colic in breastfed babies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Oct 7; 63:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2021.102781. 
I believe that the best news of the present study is the reduction of mother depression (even though they are secondary outcomes (Editado)Restaurar original)! Thus, the authors should improve the title. 


Abstract: Line 21: just new mothers? I believe all mothers have this problem.
Line 29: Give the confidence interval at baseline to 79.1 min at study end.


Materials & Methods: Some characteristics were not reported in this section. Please, describe the setting, locations, and relevant dates, including periods of recruitment, exposure, follow-up, and data collection.
Why was not the sampling power mentioned? I emphasize that the number of patients can be considered the ideal from a statistical point of view. It would be very interesting if the authors calculated the statistical power of the sample. See http://www.openepi.com/SampleSize/SSMean.htm.


Discussion: should be improved. See the meta-analysis cited above.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have investigated the effect of L. reuteri on reducing infantile colic by a prospective observational study. The participants in this study showed reduction in crying time, however, as the authors mentioned in discussion, it is known that colic is a self-improving condition and its reduction does not always explains the efficacy of the probiotics. The reviewer recommend the authors to compare the results with other studies on duration of infantile colic by age, or to compare and show the similarity with other studies with controls. 
From above reason, the conclusion " L. reuteri was associated with a significant reduction in crying...." is not adequate. Please consider correcting the conclusion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have compared the results with previous studies and states that present study has shown the same result, since the results were similar. However, comparison with other studies from different population is not adequate. The authors can only mention about comparison between before and after L.reuteri administration. Hence, the reviewer suggest the authors to conclude such as "The patients received L. reuteri DSM 17938 in this study has shown significant reduction in crying time in colicky infants over the period, which might be associated with improvement in maternal depression."

Author Response

Query: The authors have compared the results with previous studies and states that present study has shown the same result, since the results were similar. However, comparison with other studies from different population is not adequate. The authors can only mention about comparison between before and after L.reuteri administration. Hence, the reviewer suggest the authors to conclude such as "The patients received L. reuteri DSM 17938 in this study has shown significant reduction in crying time in colicky infants over the period, which might be associated with improvement in maternal depression."

 

Response: Conclusion revised to "This study observed that colicky infants who received L. reuteri DSM 17938 showed significant reduction in crying time in over the period, which might be associated with improvement in maternal depression".

Back to TopTop