Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Discussion
3.1. Scheduled Single-Ingredient Hormonal Contraception in the Form of Oral Pills
3.1.1. Effectiveness
3.1.2. Effects of Contraception on Breastfeeding and the Newborn Baby
3.2. Scheduled Single-Ingredient Hormonal Contraception in the Form of a Subcutaneous Implant or an Intrauterine Therapeutic System
3.2.1. Effectiveness
3.2.2. Effects of Contraception on Breastfeeding and the Newborn Baby
3.3. On-Demand Emergency Single-Ingredient Hormonal Contraception
3.3.1. Effectiveness
3.3.2. Effects of Contraception on Breastfeeding and the Newborn Baby
3.4. Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation—Clinical and Practice
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Diplock, A.T.; Aggett, P.J.; Ashwell, M.; Bornet, F.; Fern, E.B.; Roberfroid, M.B. Scientific Concepts of Functional Foods in Europe: Consensus document. Br. J. Nutr. 1999, 81, 1. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, S.Y.; Yi, D.Y. Components of human breast milk: From macronutrient to microbiome and microRNA. Clin. Exp. Pediatr. 2020, 63, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- World Health Organization; United Nations Children’s Fund. Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Ip, S.; Chung, M.; Raman, G.; Chew, P.; Magula, N.; DeVine, D.; Trikalinos, T.; Lau, J. Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries. Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess. (Full Rep.) 2007, 153, 1–186. [Google Scholar]
- Johnston, M.; Landers, S.; Noble, L.; Szucs, K.; Viehmann, L. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics 2012, 129, e827–e841. [Google Scholar]
- Lapidaire, W.; Lucas, A.; Clayden, J.D.; Clark, C.; Fewtrell, M.S. Human milk feeding and cognitive outcome in preterm infants: The role of infection and NEC reduction. Pediatr. Res. 2022, 91, 1207–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jensen, G.B.; Domellöf, M.; Ahlsson, F.; Elfvin, A.; Navér, L.; Abrahamssona, T. Effect of human milk-based fortification in extremely preterm infants fed exclusively with breast milk: A randomised controlled trial. eClinicalMedicine 2023, 68, 102375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Binns, C.; Lee, M.; Low, W.Y. The Long-Term Public Health Benefits of Breastfeeding. Asia Pac. J. Public Health 2016, 28, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qiu, R.; Zhong, Y.; Hu, M.; Wu, B. Breastfeeding and Reduced Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2022, 28, 8500910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prentice, A.M. Breastfeeding in the Modern World. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 78 (Suppl. S2), 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieh Holder, K.L. Contraception and Breastfeeding. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 58, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Phillips, S.J.; Tepper, N.K.; Kapp, N.; Nanda, K.; Temmerman, M.; Curtis, K.M. Progestogen-only contraceptive use among breastfeeding women: A systematic review. Contraception 2016, 94, 226–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Curtis, K.M.; Tepper, N.K.; Jatlaoui, T.C.; Berry-Bibee, E.; Horton, L.G.; Zapata, L.B.; Simmons, K.B.; Pagano, H.P.; Jamieson, D.J.; Whiteman, M.K. U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2016, 65, 1–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glasier, A.; Bhattacharya, S.; Evers, H.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K.; Hardman, S.; Heikinheimo, O.; La Vecchia, C.; Somigliana, E. Annual Capri Workshop Group. Contraception after pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019, 98, 1378–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 5th ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 978 92 4 154915 8. [Google Scholar]
- Moses-Kolko, E.L.; Berga, S.L.; Kalro, B.; Sit, D.K.Y.; Wisner, K.L. Transdermal estradiol for postpartum depression: A promising treatment option. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 52, 516–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nilsson, S.; Mellbin, T.; Hofvander, Y.; Sundelin, C.; Valentin, J.; Nygren, K.G. Long-term follow-up of children breast-fed by mothers using oral contraceptives. Contraception 1986, 34, 443–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marriq, P.; Oddo, G. La gynécomastie induite chez le nouveau-né par le lait maternel? Un accident rare des contraceptifs oraux [Letter: Gynecomastia in the newborn induced by maternal milk? An unusual complication of oral contraceptives]. Nouv. Presse Med. 1974, 3, 2579. [Google Scholar]
- Madhavapeddi, R.; Ramachandran, P. Side effects of oral contraceptive use in lactating women—Enlargement of breast in a breast-fed child. Contraception 1985, 32, 437–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karowicz-Bilińska, A.; Nowak-Markwitz, E.; Oszukowski, P.; Opala, T.; Spaczyński, M.; Wilegoś, M. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego dotyczące wskazań i bezpieczeństwa stosowania antykoncepcji hormonalnej oraz wewnątrzmaciczne. Ginekol. Pol. 2014, 85, 234–239. [Google Scholar]
- Festin, M.P.R. Overview of modern contraception. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2020, 66, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palacios, S.; Colli, E.; Regidor, P.A. Multicenter, phase III trials on the contraceptive efficacy, tolerability and safety of a new drospirenone-only pill. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2019, 98, 1549–1557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elger, W.; Beier, S.; Pollow, K.; Garfield, R.; Shi, S.O.; Hillisch, A. Conception and pharmacodynamic profile of drospirenone. Steroids 2003, 68, 891–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kubba, A.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K.; Palacios, S.; Wiegratz, I.; Grandi, G.; Colli, E.; Regidor, P.A. The drospirenone (DRSP)-only pill: Clinical implications in the daily use. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2023, 28, 36–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kimble, T.; Burke, A.E.; Barnhart, K.T.; Archer, D.F.; Colli, E.; Westhoff, C. A 1-year prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 trial of the contraceptive efficacy and safety of the oral progestin-only pill drospirenone 4 mg using a 24/4-day regimen. Contracept X 2020, 2, 100020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goulding, A.N.; Wouk, K.; Stuebe, A.M. Contraception and Breastfeeding at 4 Months Postpartum among Women Intending to Breastfeed. Breastfeed. Med. 2018, 13, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bjarnadóttir, R.I.; Gottfredsdóttir, H.; Sigurdardóttir, K.; Geirsson, R.T.; Dieben, T.O. Comparative study of the effects of a progestogen-only pill containing desogestrel and an intrauterine contraceptive device in lactating women. BJOG 2001, 108, 1174–1180. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Dutta, D.K.; Dutta, I. Desogestrel mini pill: Is this safe in lactating mother? J. Indian Med. Assoc. 2013, 111, 553–555. [Google Scholar]
- Dilbaz, B.; Bülbül, M.; Dilbaz, S.; Yılmaz, N.; Sanisoğlu, S. The efficacy, acceptability and continuation of postpartum, post-abortive progestin-only pill: A pioneering prospective multicentric study from Turkey. J. Turk. Ger. Gynecol. Assoc. 2022, 23, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janus, D.; Wojcik, M.; Tyrawa, K.; Starzyk, J. Transient isolated scrotal hair development in infancy. Clin. Pediatr. 2013, 52, 628–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiara Del Savio, M.; De Fata, R.; Facchinetti, F.; Grandi, G. Drospirenone 4 mg-only pill (DOP) in 24+4 regimen: A new option for oral contraception. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020, 13, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Melka, D.; Kask, K.; Colli, E.; Regidor, P.A. A single-arm study to evaluate the transfer of drospirenone to breast milk after reaching steady state, following oral administration of 4 mg drospirenone in healthy lactating female volunteers. Womens Health 2020, 16, 1745506520957192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blode, H.; Foidart, J.M.; Heithecker, R. Transfer of drospirenone to breast milk after a single oral administration of 3 mg drospirenone + 30 microg ethinylestradiol to healthy lactating women. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2001, 6, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Blode, H.; Wuttke, W.; Loock, W.; Röll, G.; Heithecker, R. A 1-year pharmacokinetic investigation of a novel oral contraceptive containing drospirenone, in healthy female volunteers. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Health Care 2000, 5, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Römer, T.; Bitzer, J.; Egarter, C.; Hadji, P.; Kiechle, M.; Kramer, H.; Oppelt, P.G.; Peters, K.; Stute, P.; Schaudig, K.; et al. Oral Progestins in Hormonal Contraception: Importance and Future Perspectives of a New Progestin Only-Pill Containing 4 mg Drospirenone. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2021, 81, 1021–1030. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Caruso, S.; Caruso, G.; Bruno, M.T.; Minona, P.; Di Guardo, F.; Palumbo, M. Effects of Drospirenone only pill contraception on postpartum mood disorders: A prospective, comparative pilot study. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2023, 288, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stanton, T.A.; Blumenthal, P.D. Postpartum hormonal contraception in breastfeeding women. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 31, 441–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Archer, D.F.; Ahrendt, H.J.; Drouin, D. Drospirenone-only oral contraceptive: Results from a multicenter noncomparative trial of efficacy, safety and tolerability. Contraception 2015, 92, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Apter, D.; Colli, E.; Gemzell-Danielsson, K.; Peters, K. Multicenter, open-label trial to assess the safety and tolerability of drospirenone 4.0 mg over 6 cycles in female adolescents, with a 7-cycle extension phase. Contraception 2020, 101, 12–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stuebe, A.M.; Bryant, A.G.; Lewis, R.; Muddana, A. Association of etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant with reduced weight gain in an exclusively breastfed infant: Report and literature review. Breastfeed. Med. 2016, 11, 203–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reinprayoon, D.; Taneepanichskul, S.; Bunyavejchevin, S.; Thaithumyanon, P.; Punnahitananda, S.; Tosukhowong, P.; Machielsen, C.; van Beek, A. Effects of the etonogestrel-releasing contraceptive implant (Implanon) on parameters of breastfeeding compared to those of an intrauterine device. Contraception 2000, 62, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vricella, L.K.; Gawron, L.M.; Louis, J.M. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Consult Series #48: Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception for women at high-risk for medical complications. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, B2–B12. [Google Scholar]
- Taneepanichskul, S.; Reinprayoon, D.; Thaithumyanon, P.; Praisuwanna, P.; Tosukhowong, P.; Dieben, T. Effects of the etonogestrel-releasing implant Implanon® and a nonmedicated intrauterine device on the growth of breast-fed infants. Contraception 2006, 73, 368–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Carmo, L.S.; Braga, G.C.; Ferriani, R.A.; Quintana, S.M.; Vieira, C.S. Timing of etonogestrel-releasing implants and growth of breastfed infants: A randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017, 130, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Braga, G.C.; Ferriolli, E.; Quintana, S.M.; Ferriani, R.A.; Pfrimer, K.; Vieira, C.S. Immediate post-partum initiation of etonogestrel-releasing implant: A randomized controlled trial on breastfeeding impact. Contraception 2015, 92, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Heikkilä, M.; Haukkamaa, M.; Luukkainen, T. Levonorgestrel in milk and plasma of breast-feeding women with a levonorgestrel-releasing IUD. Contraception 1982, 25, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bahamondes, L.; Bahamondes, M.V.; Modesto, W.; Tilley, I.B.; Magalhães, A.; Pinto e Silva, J.L.; Amaral, E.; Mishell, D.R. Effect of hormonal contraceptives during breastfeeding on infant’s milk ingestion and growth. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krashin, J.W.; Lemani, C.; Nkambule, J.; Talama, G.; Chinula, L.; Flax, V.L.; Stuebe, A.M.; Tang, J.H. A comparison of breastfeeding exclusivity and duration rates between immediate postpartum levonorgestrel versus etonogestrel implant users: A prospective cohort study. Breastfeed. Med. 2019, 14, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaamash, A.H.; Sayed, G.H.; Hussien, M.M.; Shaaban, M.M. A comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena® versus the Copper T380A intrauterine device during lactation: Breast-feeding performance, infant growth and infant development. Contraception 2005, 72, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Caird, L.E.; Reid-Thomas, V.; Hannan, W.J.; Gow, S.; Glasier, A.F. Oral progestogen-only contraception may protect against loss of bone mass in breast-feeding women. Clin. Endocrinol. 1994, 41, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Costa, M.L.; Cecatti, J.G.; Krupa, F.G.; Rehder, P.M.; Sousa, M.H.; Costa-Paiva, L. Progestin-only contraception prevents bone loss in postpartum breastfeeding women. Contraception 2012, 85, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gainer, E.; Massai, R.; Lillo, S.; Reyes, V.; Forcelledo, M.L.; Caviedes, R.; Villarroel, C.; Bouyer, J. Levonorgestrel pharmacokinetics in plasma and milk of lactating women who take 1.5 mg for emergency contraception. Hum. Reprod. 2007, 22, 1578–1584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levonorgestrel (Plan B One-Step®). July 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK583410/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Polakow-Farkash, S.; Gilad, O.; Merlob, P.; Stahl, B.; Yogev, Y.; Klinger, G. Levonorgestrel used for emergency contraception during lactation-a prospective observational cohort study on maternal and infant safety. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013, 26, 219–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ulotka Dołączona do Opakowania: Informacja dla Użytkownika, ellaOne 30 mg Tabletka. Data Ostatniej Aktualizacji Ulotki Listopad. 2018. Available online: https://www.hra-pharma.com/PIL/PL/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed®). Ulipristal, Last Revision: 18 July 2022. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500655/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
- Curtis, K.M.; Jatlaoui, T.C.; Tepper, N.K.; Zapata, L.B.; Horton, L.G.; Jamieson, D.J.; Whiteman, M.K. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2016, 65, 1–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wszołek, K.M.; Chmaj-Wierzchowska, K.; Pięt, M.; Tarka, A.; Chuchracki, M.; Męczekalski, B.; Wilczak, M. Neonatal breast-suckling skills in the context of lactation and peripartum hormonal changes and additional factors-a pilot study. Int. Breastfeed. J. 2022, 17, 66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Karabayir, N.; Mertturk Potak, E.; Karaman, S.; Sebirli, M.F.; Istanbullu, M.B.; Potak, M.; Teber, B.G. The Finger Feeding Method and Relactation. Cureus 2022, 14, e24044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glasier, A.F.; Cameron, S.T.; Fine, P.M.; Logan, S.J.; Casale, W.; Van Horn, J.; Sogor, L.; Blithe, D.L.; Scherrer, B.; Mathe, H.; et al. Ulipristal acetate versus levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: A randomised noninferiority trial and meta-analysis. Lancet 2010, 375, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cleland, K.; Zhu, H.; Goldstuck, N.; Cheng, L.; Trussell, J. The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: A systematic review of 35 years of experience. Hum. Reprod. 2012, 27, 1994–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afaxys Inc. Ella Package Insert; Afaxys Inc.: Charleston, SC, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Shaaban, O.M.; Abbas, A.M.; Mahmoud, H.R.; Yones, E.M.; Mahmoud, A.; Zakherah, M.S. Levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive pills use during breastfeeding; effect on infants’ health and development. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019, 32, 2524–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ispas-Jouron, S.; Seuc, A.; Northstone, K.; Festin, M. Effects of maternal use of hormonal contraception during breastfeeding: Results from a British birth cohort. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 250, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Espey, E.; Ogburn, T.; Leeman, L.; Singh, R.; Ostrom, K.; Schrader, R. Effect of Progestin Compared With Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills on Lactation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 119, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Database | Search Strategy | Results |
---|---|---|
PubMed (MEDLINE) Cochrane Database | 1.1. “lactation” and “oral contraception” with focus on options like: “drospirenone”, “4 mg of drospirenone” or “desogestrel”, “75 μg of desogestrel” 1.2. “breastfeeding” and “oral contraception” with focus on options like: “drospirenone”, “4 mg drospirenone” or “desogestrel”, “75 μg desogestrel” | ad. 1.1. with “drospirenone” (n = 5), with “4 mg drospirenone” (n = 4) or with “desogestrel” (n = 16), with “75 μg desogestrel” (n = 0) ad. 1.2. with “drospirenone” (n = 3), with “4 mg drospirenone” (n = 3) or with “desogestrel” (n = 13), with “75 μg desogestrel” (n = 0) |
2.1. “lactation” with focus on options like: “subcutaneous etonogestrel implant”, “etonogestrel implant” or “levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system” 2.2. “breastfeeding” with focus on options like: “subcutaneous etonogestrel implant”, “etonogestrel implant” or “levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system” | ad. 2.1. with “subcutaneous etonogestrel implant” (n = 1), with “etonogestrel implant” (n = 28) or with “levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system” (n = 16) ad. 2.2. with “subcutaneous etonogestrel implant” (n = 1), with “etonogestrel implant” (n = 30) or with “levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system” (n = 17) | |
3.1. “lactation” and “oral contraception” with “emergency contraception”, with focus on options like: “levonorgestrel”, “1.5 mg levonorgestrel” or “ulipristal acetate”, “30 mg ulipristal acetate” 3.2. “breastfeeding” and “oral contraception” with “emergency contraception”, with focus on options like: “levonorgestrel”, “1.5 mg levonorgestrel” or “ulipristal acetate”, “30 mg ulipristal acetate” | ad. 3.1. with “levonorgestrel” (n = 9), with “1.5 mg levonorgestrel” (n = 0) or with “30 mg ulipristal acetate” (n = 0), with “ulipristal acetate” (n = 2) ad. 3.2. with “levonorgestrel” (n = 10), with “1.5 mg levonorgestrel” (n = 0) or with “30 mg ulipristal acetate” (n = 0), with “ulipristal acetate” (n = 3) |
Scheduled Contraception | Use * | Effects on Breastfeeding | Safety of Use in the Newborn |
---|---|---|---|
75 μg desogestrel —1 × 1 pill |
| Desogestrel is metabolized to the active metabolite—etonogestrel−0.01 to 0.05 μg of etonogestrel per kg bw/day can be taken in by an infant (considering an estimated milk intake of 150 mL/kg bw/day) [27]. | It does not seem to affect the production or quality of milk secretion, although, in the postpartum period, a reduction in milk production was noted but not very often (…) [27,28,29,30] |
4 mg drospirenone —1 × 1 pill |
| (…) at therapeutic doses, it is not expected to affect newborns and/or breastfed infants (…) and can be used during lactation. DRS is a progestogen analog of spironolactone. It has anti-mineralocorticoid and anti-androgenic properties. The amounts in milk are minimal and no adverse effects are anticipated on the breastfed infant or milk supply [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]. | |
Subcutaneous implant (68 mg of micronized etonogestrel) | Nonbreastfeeding women: insertion on the 21st to 28th day after childbirth does not require additional contraceptive methods. If insertion occurs later than 28 days after delivery, use barrier methods for an additional 7 days. If sexual intercourse has taken place, pregnancy should be ruled out. Breastfeeding: insertion 4 weeks after childbirth along with the use of a barrier method for 7 days. If sexual intercourse has taken place, pregnancy should be ruled out. |
| It does not affect the secretion or quality of breast milk (...), although the child’s growth and development should be carefully monitored. It does not affect the secretion and quality of breast milk and has no effect on newborn development [42,43,44,45]. |
The levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) | Nonbreastfeeding women: postpartum insertion until uterine involution is complete, usually occurring 6 weeks after delivery. If involution is delayed, consider waiting until 12 weeks after delivery. Breastfeeding: “the use of contraceptives containing only progestogens, initiated from the 6th week after delivery, has no harmful effect on the growth or development of the child (...) and the quantity or quality of breast milk (...)”. |
| It has no harmful effects on the growth and development of the child (...) nor on the quantity or quality of breast milk. It does not affect the secretion and quality of breast milk and has no effect on the development of the neonate [47,48,49,50]. |
Emergency Contraception | Use | Effects on Breastfeeding | Safety of Use in the Newborn |
with 1.5 mg LNG—1 × 1 pill | Nonbreastfeeding women: Take 1 pill as soon as possible, preferably within 12 h and no later than 72 h after unprotected sex. Breastfeeding: some authors suggest refraining from breastfeeding for at least 8 h after using 1.5 mg levonorgestrel [51], while some others suggest refraining for 3–4 h [52]. During this time, pump mechanically and discard milk to stimulate lactation. Conversely, some authors do not specify the need to interrupt breastfeeding after levonorgestrel intake [53]. |
| Permeates into human milk. “A single application of 1.5 mg LNS tablet does not objectively affect the health and development of the breastfed child, nor does it subjectively affect the amount of milk secreted” [61]. |
30 mg ulipristal acetate —1 × 1 pill | Nonbreastfeeding women: Take 1 pill as soon as possible, no later than 120 h (5 days) after unprotected sex in the event of contraceptive method failure. Breastfeeding: as above; it is recommended to avoid breastfeeding for one week (7 days) [54], whereas the LactMed database recommends avoiding breastfeeding for 24 h after administration [54,55]. |
| Effects on neonates and/or infants have not been studied. Risk to the breastfed infant cannot be ruled out. Effects in breastfed infants, lactation, and breast milk—no relevant published information was found as of the date of this update [LactMed]. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chmaj-Wierzchowska, K.; Wszołek, K.; Tomczyk, K.; Wilczak, M. Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview. Clin. Pract. 2024, 14, 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030083
Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Wszołek K, Tomczyk K, Wilczak M. Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview. Clinics and Practice. 2024; 14(3):1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030083
Chicago/Turabian StyleChmaj-Wierzchowska, Karolina, Katarzyna Wszołek, Katarzyna Tomczyk, and Maciej Wilczak. 2024. "Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview" Clinics and Practice 14, no. 3: 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030083
APA StyleChmaj-Wierzchowska, K., Wszołek, K., Tomczyk, K., & Wilczak, M. (2024). Safety of Progestogen Hormonal Contraceptive Methods during Lactation: An Overview. Clinics and Practice, 14(3), 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14030083